Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 60-72.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023247
Previous Articles Next Articles
Hong-fei LI1(), Bang-wei ZHOU1, Miao ZHANG1, Shu-nan SHI2, Zhi-jian LI1()
Received:
2023-07-18
Revised:
2023-08-28
Online:
2024-04-20
Published:
2024-01-15
Contact:
Zhi-jian LI
Hong-fei LI, Bang-wei ZHOU, Miao ZHANG, Shu-nan SHI, Zhi-jian LI. Adaptability evaluation of different oat varieties introduced in the Hulunbuir region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 60-72.
品种 Variety | 生育期 Phenological stages (月-日 Month-day) | 生育周期 Growth duration (d) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种期 Sowing stage | 出苗期 Seedling stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Pustulation stage | 完熟期 Mature stage | ||
A | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-26 | 09-06 | 09-20 | 10-05 | 104 |
B | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-26 | 09-07 | 09-21 | 10-06 | 105 |
C | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-06 | 07-20 | 08-09 | 08-14 | 08-27 | 09-22 | 91 |
D | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-16 | 08-21 | 09-01 | 09-24 | 92 |
E | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-20 | 08-25 | 09-05 | 09-25 | 94 |
F | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-22 | 08-16 | 08-23 | 09-10 | 09-22 | 91 |
G | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-07 | 07-21 | 08-14 | 08-23 | 09-03 | 09-18 | 87 |
H | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 09-04 | 09-12 | 09-24 | 10-10 | 109 |
I | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-28 | 09-10 | 09-23 | 10-10 | 109 |
J | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-22 | 08-29 | 09-10 | 09-22 | 10-09 | 108 |
K | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-12 | 08-21 | 08-31 | 09-19 | 88 |
L | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-19 | 08-09 | 08-14 | 08-24 | 09-13 | 82 |
M | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-12 | 08-19 | 08-31 | 09-16 | 85 |
N | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-18 | 08-23 | 09-05 | 09-23 | 92 |
O | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-16 | 08-21 | 09-03 | 09-21 | 90 |
P | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 09-03 | 09-09 | 09-22 | 10-09 | 108 |
Q | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-12 | 08-21 | 09-01 | 09-15 | 84 |
R | 06-23 | 06-28 | 07-06 | 07-19 | 08-08 | 08-13 | 08-21 | 09-05 | 76 |
Table 1 The phenological stages of different oat varieties
品种 Variety | 生育期 Phenological stages (月-日 Month-day) | 生育周期 Growth duration (d) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种期 Sowing stage | 出苗期 Seedling stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Pustulation stage | 完熟期 Mature stage | ||
A | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-26 | 09-06 | 09-20 | 10-05 | 104 |
B | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-26 | 09-07 | 09-21 | 10-06 | 105 |
C | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-06 | 07-20 | 08-09 | 08-14 | 08-27 | 09-22 | 91 |
D | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-16 | 08-21 | 09-01 | 09-24 | 92 |
E | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-20 | 08-25 | 09-05 | 09-25 | 94 |
F | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-22 | 08-16 | 08-23 | 09-10 | 09-22 | 91 |
G | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-07 | 07-21 | 08-14 | 08-23 | 09-03 | 09-18 | 87 |
H | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 09-04 | 09-12 | 09-24 | 10-10 | 109 |
I | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-28 | 09-10 | 09-23 | 10-10 | 109 |
J | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-22 | 08-29 | 09-10 | 09-22 | 10-09 | 108 |
K | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-12 | 08-21 | 08-31 | 09-19 | 88 |
L | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-19 | 08-09 | 08-14 | 08-24 | 09-13 | 82 |
M | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-12 | 08-19 | 08-31 | 09-16 | 85 |
N | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-18 | 08-23 | 09-05 | 09-23 | 92 |
O | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 08-16 | 08-21 | 09-03 | 09-21 | 90 |
P | 06-23 | 06-30 | 07-08 | 07-21 | 09-03 | 09-09 | 09-22 | 10-09 | 108 |
Q | 06-23 | 06-29 | 07-07 | 07-20 | 08-12 | 08-21 | 09-01 | 09-15 | 84 |
R | 06-23 | 06-28 | 07-06 | 07-19 | 08-08 | 08-13 | 08-21 | 09-05 | 76 |
品种 Variety | 茎粗 Plant diameter (cm) | 茎节数 Stalk pitch (No.) | 穗长 | 旗叶长 Flag leaf length (cm) | 旗叶宽 Flag leaf width (cm) | 旗叶面积 Flag leaf area (cm2) | 鲜干比 Fresh/dry | 茎叶比 Stem/leaf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 0.79±0.05cd | 6.33±0.58a | 24.97±0.87d | 29.20±1.30f | 2.83±0.15b | 68.70±0.83b | 3.73±0.23ef | 2.23±0.03fgh |
B | 0.94±0.05b | 6.67±0.58a | 35.03±1.17a | 31.33±0.15de | 3.53±0.15a | 92.08±4.06a | 3.13±0.03hi | 2.30±0.04f |
C | 0.69±0.07ef | 4.00±0.00e | 14.87±0.60j | 17.07±0.45j | 1.57±0.06i | 22.23±0.48i | 4.98±0.12a | 1.90±0.05k |
D | 0.64±0.03fg | 4.33±0.58de | 30.70±1.61c | 33.47±0.57bc | 1.93±0.06efg | 53.81±1.62c | 3.83±0.06e | 2.17±0.03hij |
E | 0.49±0.05i | 5.33±0.58bc | 23.03±1.12e | 25.03±1.20i | 1.63±0.06hi | 34.04±2.74gh | 3.64±0.26efg | 2.12±0.05j |
F | 0.65±0.05efg | 4.67±0.58cde | 21.07±1.25fg | 27.23±0.83gh | 1.63±0.06hi | 37.01±2.25efgh | 3.96±0.09de | 1.74±0.05l |
G | 0.64±0.03fg | 5.00±0.00cd | 20.23±0.93gh | 30.37±0.87ef | 1.53±0.06i | 38.75±2.41defg | 3.91±0.08e | 2.85±0.04a |
H | 0.66±0.05efg | 6.00±0.00ab | 18.03±0.45i | 29.50±0.60ef | 2.23±0.15d | 54.83±4.60c | 3.43±0.06fgh | 2.15±0.04ij |
I | 0.69±0.05ef | 5.33±0.58bc | 32.50±0.80b | 34.40±0.62b | 2.00±0.10def | 57.25±3.88c | 3.27±0.11hi | 2.24±0.02fgh |
J | 1.04±0.05a | 6.00±0.00ab | 29.87±0.95c | 32.47±1.12cd | 2.67±0.15bc | 71.91±1.68b | 3.04±0.05i | 2.22±0.04ghi |
K | 0.59±0.05gh | 5.00±0.00cd | 19.23±0.55hi | 31.20±0.66de | 1.57±0.06i | 40.63±0.80def | 4.59±0.06bc | 2.77±0.02b |
L | 0.73±0.03de | 4.67±0.58cde | 17.87±0.32i | 27.27±1.17g | 1.87±0.15fgh | 42.24±1.93de | 4.71±0.14ab | 2.37±0.04e |
M | 0.52±0.02hi | 4.33±0.58de | 22.57±0.40ef | 29.70±1.37ef | 1.70±0.20ghi | 42.09±6.27de | 4.27±0.32cd | 2.69±0.04c |
N | 0.81±0.02cd | 5.33±0.58bc | 30.67±0.96c | 43.03±1.06a | 2.50±0.10c | 89.54±5.76a | 3.72±0.21ef | 2.46±0.04d |
O | 0.87±0.02bc | 4.67±0.58cde | 20.13±0.80gh | 25.37±0.42hi | 1.63±0.15hi | 34.43±2.74fgh | 3.66±0.13efg | 1.92±0.04k |
P | 0.82±0.05c | 6.00±0.00ab | 20.60±0.26gh | 24.20±0.66i | 2.00±0.10def | 40.23±1.61defg | 3.35±0.13ghi | 2.25±0.06fg |
Q | 0.73±0.03de | 4.67±0.58cde | 19.20±0.30hi | 24.90±0.30i | 2.17±0.15de | 44.90±3.69d | 3.42±0.21fgh | 2.76±0.01bc |
R | 0.61±0.03fg | 4.33±0.58de | 21.23±0.35fg | 23.93±1.46i | 1.57±0.06i | 31.17±1.97h | 4.28±0.30cd | 2.16±0.03hij |
Table 2 Comparison of different oat varieties agronomic traits during pustulation stage
品种 Variety | 茎粗 Plant diameter (cm) | 茎节数 Stalk pitch (No.) | 穗长 | 旗叶长 Flag leaf length (cm) | 旗叶宽 Flag leaf width (cm) | 旗叶面积 Flag leaf area (cm2) | 鲜干比 Fresh/dry | 茎叶比 Stem/leaf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 0.79±0.05cd | 6.33±0.58a | 24.97±0.87d | 29.20±1.30f | 2.83±0.15b | 68.70±0.83b | 3.73±0.23ef | 2.23±0.03fgh |
B | 0.94±0.05b | 6.67±0.58a | 35.03±1.17a | 31.33±0.15de | 3.53±0.15a | 92.08±4.06a | 3.13±0.03hi | 2.30±0.04f |
C | 0.69±0.07ef | 4.00±0.00e | 14.87±0.60j | 17.07±0.45j | 1.57±0.06i | 22.23±0.48i | 4.98±0.12a | 1.90±0.05k |
D | 0.64±0.03fg | 4.33±0.58de | 30.70±1.61c | 33.47±0.57bc | 1.93±0.06efg | 53.81±1.62c | 3.83±0.06e | 2.17±0.03hij |
E | 0.49±0.05i | 5.33±0.58bc | 23.03±1.12e | 25.03±1.20i | 1.63±0.06hi | 34.04±2.74gh | 3.64±0.26efg | 2.12±0.05j |
F | 0.65±0.05efg | 4.67±0.58cde | 21.07±1.25fg | 27.23±0.83gh | 1.63±0.06hi | 37.01±2.25efgh | 3.96±0.09de | 1.74±0.05l |
G | 0.64±0.03fg | 5.00±0.00cd | 20.23±0.93gh | 30.37±0.87ef | 1.53±0.06i | 38.75±2.41defg | 3.91±0.08e | 2.85±0.04a |
H | 0.66±0.05efg | 6.00±0.00ab | 18.03±0.45i | 29.50±0.60ef | 2.23±0.15d | 54.83±4.60c | 3.43±0.06fgh | 2.15±0.04ij |
I | 0.69±0.05ef | 5.33±0.58bc | 32.50±0.80b | 34.40±0.62b | 2.00±0.10def | 57.25±3.88c | 3.27±0.11hi | 2.24±0.02fgh |
J | 1.04±0.05a | 6.00±0.00ab | 29.87±0.95c | 32.47±1.12cd | 2.67±0.15bc | 71.91±1.68b | 3.04±0.05i | 2.22±0.04ghi |
K | 0.59±0.05gh | 5.00±0.00cd | 19.23±0.55hi | 31.20±0.66de | 1.57±0.06i | 40.63±0.80def | 4.59±0.06bc | 2.77±0.02b |
L | 0.73±0.03de | 4.67±0.58cde | 17.87±0.32i | 27.27±1.17g | 1.87±0.15fgh | 42.24±1.93de | 4.71±0.14ab | 2.37±0.04e |
M | 0.52±0.02hi | 4.33±0.58de | 22.57±0.40ef | 29.70±1.37ef | 1.70±0.20ghi | 42.09±6.27de | 4.27±0.32cd | 2.69±0.04c |
N | 0.81±0.02cd | 5.33±0.58bc | 30.67±0.96c | 43.03±1.06a | 2.50±0.10c | 89.54±5.76a | 3.72±0.21ef | 2.46±0.04d |
O | 0.87±0.02bc | 4.67±0.58cde | 20.13±0.80gh | 25.37±0.42hi | 1.63±0.15hi | 34.43±2.74fgh | 3.66±0.13efg | 1.92±0.04k |
P | 0.82±0.05c | 6.00±0.00ab | 20.60±0.26gh | 24.20±0.66i | 2.00±0.10def | 40.23±1.61defg | 3.35±0.13ghi | 2.25±0.06fg |
Q | 0.73±0.03de | 4.67±0.58cde | 19.20±0.30hi | 24.90±0.30i | 2.17±0.15de | 44.90±3.69d | 3.42±0.21fgh | 2.76±0.01bc |
R | 0.61±0.03fg | 4.33±0.58de | 21.23±0.35fg | 23.93±1.46i | 1.57±0.06i | 31.17±1.97h | 4.28±0.30cd | 2.16±0.03hij |
品种 Variety | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Pustulation stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Pustulation stage | |
A | 64.00±2.56cdefg | 61.95±1.09bcd | 59.80±0.64cdef | 39.54±2.84abcd | 34.20±2.55cde | 33.95±1.98bcd |
B | 65.74±1.06abc | 62.21±2.47bcd | 60.63±0.26bcd | 37.02±2.03bcde | 34.30±0.86cde | 32.32±1.26cd |
C | 65.11±0.49abcd | 60.30±0.98cde | 60.37±1.52bcd | 39.80±0.59abc | 36.93±1.42abcd | 37.06±0.79ab |
D | 59.35±1.58ij | 56.84±1.18fgh | 54.28±2.92g | 31.99±3.36f | 31.53±1.23e | 29.88±0.98d |
E | 61.27±1.47ghi | 58.92±0.49defg | 58.06±0.68cdefg | 36.22±1.52cde | 34.81±0.91cde | 36.06±3.49abc |
F | 61.32±1.33ghi | 57.35±2.78defg | 56.12±1.40efg | 36.15±0.77cde | 35.35±1.91bcde | 34.32±3.09bcd |
G | 67.68±1.34ab | 66.97±1.86a | 65.49±2.08a | 40.63±2.70ab | 39.80±2.33a | 40.23±1.26a |
H | 62.06±1.70fghi | 59.46±1.02defg | 56.30±2.83efg | 38.65±1.93abcde | 36.75±1.15abcd | 34.12±1.53bcd |
I | 64.79±1.17cdef | 62.07±1.97bcd | 60.98±1.61bc | 37.10±0.58bcde | 36.46±0.67abcd | 35.84±1.14abc |
J | 60.06±1.27ij | 55.40±0.78h | 56.01±0.97fg | 35.49±1.43ef | 33.75±2.72cde | 34.32±2.19bcd |
K | 69.48±0.28a | 64.19±1.23ab | 59.95±2.21cde | 36.73±2.42bcde | 36.82±0.75abcd | 38.18±0.85ab |
L | 66.46±0.90bc | 63.90±0.45ab | 63.98±0.28ab | 41.63±0.68a | 39.43±1.65ab | 36.38±1.24abc |
M | 58.32±1.82j | 62.80±2.24bc | 61.29±2.15bc | 36.72±1.72bcde | 37.69±1.74abc | 36.16±3.33abc |
N | 63.25±1.35defg | 59.93±2.47cdef | 61.14±2.93bc | 38.72±1.94abcde | 37.58±1.31abc | 36.69±1.81abc |
O | 60.24±1.56hij | 54.98±1.36h | 55.77±0.56g | 36.03±1.15cde | 35.23±1.96bcde | 34.19±0.63bcd |
P | 62.96±0.42efgh | 56.44±0.65gh | 55.87±0.45g | 35.66±1.37def | 32.61±2.04de | 36.30±0.51abc |
Q | 65.19±1.26abcd | 60.55±1.50cde | 56.85±3.46defg | 36.60±1.23cde | 35.21±1.37bcde | 36.12±0.43abc |
R | 66.36±0.65bc | 61.64±1.84bcd | 56.92±1.78defg | 39.58±0.89abcd | 36.58±1.18abcd | 35.23±0.39bc |
Table 3 Comparison of different oat varieties neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber (%)
品种 Variety | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Pustulation stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Pustulation stage | |
A | 64.00±2.56cdefg | 61.95±1.09bcd | 59.80±0.64cdef | 39.54±2.84abcd | 34.20±2.55cde | 33.95±1.98bcd |
B | 65.74±1.06abc | 62.21±2.47bcd | 60.63±0.26bcd | 37.02±2.03bcde | 34.30±0.86cde | 32.32±1.26cd |
C | 65.11±0.49abcd | 60.30±0.98cde | 60.37±1.52bcd | 39.80±0.59abc | 36.93±1.42abcd | 37.06±0.79ab |
D | 59.35±1.58ij | 56.84±1.18fgh | 54.28±2.92g | 31.99±3.36f | 31.53±1.23e | 29.88±0.98d |
E | 61.27±1.47ghi | 58.92±0.49defg | 58.06±0.68cdefg | 36.22±1.52cde | 34.81±0.91cde | 36.06±3.49abc |
F | 61.32±1.33ghi | 57.35±2.78defg | 56.12±1.40efg | 36.15±0.77cde | 35.35±1.91bcde | 34.32±3.09bcd |
G | 67.68±1.34ab | 66.97±1.86a | 65.49±2.08a | 40.63±2.70ab | 39.80±2.33a | 40.23±1.26a |
H | 62.06±1.70fghi | 59.46±1.02defg | 56.30±2.83efg | 38.65±1.93abcde | 36.75±1.15abcd | 34.12±1.53bcd |
I | 64.79±1.17cdef | 62.07±1.97bcd | 60.98±1.61bc | 37.10±0.58bcde | 36.46±0.67abcd | 35.84±1.14abc |
J | 60.06±1.27ij | 55.40±0.78h | 56.01±0.97fg | 35.49±1.43ef | 33.75±2.72cde | 34.32±2.19bcd |
K | 69.48±0.28a | 64.19±1.23ab | 59.95±2.21cde | 36.73±2.42bcde | 36.82±0.75abcd | 38.18±0.85ab |
L | 66.46±0.90bc | 63.90±0.45ab | 63.98±0.28ab | 41.63±0.68a | 39.43±1.65ab | 36.38±1.24abc |
M | 58.32±1.82j | 62.80±2.24bc | 61.29±2.15bc | 36.72±1.72bcde | 37.69±1.74abc | 36.16±3.33abc |
N | 63.25±1.35defg | 59.93±2.47cdef | 61.14±2.93bc | 38.72±1.94abcde | 37.58±1.31abc | 36.69±1.81abc |
O | 60.24±1.56hij | 54.98±1.36h | 55.77±0.56g | 36.03±1.15cde | 35.23±1.96bcde | 34.19±0.63bcd |
P | 62.96±0.42efgh | 56.44±0.65gh | 55.87±0.45g | 35.66±1.37def | 32.61±2.04de | 36.30±0.51abc |
Q | 65.19±1.26abcd | 60.55±1.50cde | 56.85±3.46defg | 36.60±1.23cde | 35.21±1.37bcde | 36.12±0.43abc |
R | 66.36±0.65bc | 61.64±1.84bcd | 56.92±1.78defg | 39.58±0.89abcd | 36.58±1.18abcd | 35.23±0.39bc |
指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank | 指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 0.096 | 7 | 茎叶比 Stem/leaf | 0.101 | 6 |
鲜草产量 Fresh yield | 0.114 | 5 | 粗蛋白 CP | 0.116 | 4 |
干草产量 Hay yield | 0.119 | 3 | 酸性洗涤纤维 ADF | 0.064 | 10 |
旗叶面积Flag leaf area | 0.124 | 2 | 中性洗涤纤维 NDF | 0.071 | 8 |
鲜干比 Fresh/dry | 0.131 | 1 | 相对饲喂价值 RFV | 0.065 | 9 |
Table 4 Weights of the different index
指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank | 指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 0.096 | 7 | 茎叶比 Stem/leaf | 0.101 | 6 |
鲜草产量 Fresh yield | 0.114 | 5 | 粗蛋白 CP | 0.116 | 4 |
干草产量 Hay yield | 0.119 | 3 | 酸性洗涤纤维 ADF | 0.064 | 10 |
旗叶面积Flag leaf area | 0.124 | 2 | 中性洗涤纤维 NDF | 0.071 | 8 |
鲜干比 Fresh/dry | 0.131 | 1 | 相对饲喂价值 RFV | 0.065 | 9 |
品种 Variety | 等权Equal weight | 加权Weighted | 品种 Variety | 等权Equal weight | 加权Weighted | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | 关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | 关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | 关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | ||
甜燕1号 Tianyan No.1 | 0.697 | 9 | 0.685 | 8 | 伽利略 Galileo | 0.759 | 3 | 0.746 | 2 |
甜燕3号 Tianyan No.3 | 0.769 | 1 | 0.767 | 1 | B5-2 | 0.618 | 17 | 0.612 | 17 |
福燕1号 Fuyan No.1 | 0.706 | 6 | 0.708 | 6 | Song | 0.623 | 16 | 0.623 | 16 |
福燕2号 Fuyan No.2 | 0.765 | 2 | 0.730 | 3 | 东燕1号 Dongyan No.1 | 0.637 | 15 | 0.629 | 15 |
丹燕111 Danyan No.111 | 0.683 | 12 | 0.672 | 11 | 牧王 Haymaker | 0.704 | 7 | 0.709 | 5 |
白燕7号 Baiyan No.7 | 0.693 | 10 | 0.670 | 12 | Ca-1 | 0.712 | 5 | 0.686 | 7 |
蒙饲燕4号 Mengsiyan No.4 | 0.608 | 18 | 0.612 | 17 | 爱沃126 Ever leaf 126 | 0.687 | 11 | 0.673 | 10 |
爱沃 Ever leaf | 0.699 | 8 | 0.680 | 9 | Mogan | 0.661 | 13 | 0.645 | 13 |
贝勒 Baylor | 0.721 | 4 | 0.717 | 4 | 甜燕60号 Tianyan No.60 | 0.658 | 14 | 0.639 | 14 |
Table 5 Correlation degree and ranking of oat varieties tested
品种 Variety | 等权Equal weight | 加权Weighted | 品种 Variety | 等权Equal weight | 加权Weighted | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | 关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | 关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | 关联度 Correlation degree | 排序 Rank | ||
甜燕1号 Tianyan No.1 | 0.697 | 9 | 0.685 | 8 | 伽利略 Galileo | 0.759 | 3 | 0.746 | 2 |
甜燕3号 Tianyan No.3 | 0.769 | 1 | 0.767 | 1 | B5-2 | 0.618 | 17 | 0.612 | 17 |
福燕1号 Fuyan No.1 | 0.706 | 6 | 0.708 | 6 | Song | 0.623 | 16 | 0.623 | 16 |
福燕2号 Fuyan No.2 | 0.765 | 2 | 0.730 | 3 | 东燕1号 Dongyan No.1 | 0.637 | 15 | 0.629 | 15 |
丹燕111 Danyan No.111 | 0.683 | 12 | 0.672 | 11 | 牧王 Haymaker | 0.704 | 7 | 0.709 | 5 |
白燕7号 Baiyan No.7 | 0.693 | 10 | 0.670 | 12 | Ca-1 | 0.712 | 5 | 0.686 | 7 |
蒙饲燕4号 Mengsiyan No.4 | 0.608 | 18 | 0.612 | 17 | 爱沃126 Ever leaf 126 | 0.687 | 11 | 0.673 | 10 |
爱沃 Ever leaf | 0.699 | 8 | 0.680 | 9 | Mogan | 0.661 | 13 | 0.645 | 13 |
贝勒 Baylor | 0.721 | 4 | 0.717 | 4 | 甜燕60号 Tianyan No.60 | 0.658 | 14 | 0.639 | 14 |
1 | Zhao X F, Rong Y P, Zhao L X. The collection and evaluation of oat (Avena sativa) in China. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(3): 36-40. |
赵秀芳, 戎郁萍, 赵来喜. 我国燕麦种质资源的收集和评价. 草业科学, 2007, 24(3): 36-40. | |
2 | Hou L Y, Zhu Z Y, Yang J, et al. Current status, problems and potentials of forage oat in China. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 45(3): 248-253. |
侯龙鱼, 朱泽义, 杨杰, 等. 我国饲草用燕麦现状、问题和潜力. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(3): 248-253. | |
3 | Yang C, Wang G G, Wang M L. Production and trade of wild oat forage in China. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(5): 1129-1135. |
杨春, 王国刚, 王明利. 我国的燕麦草生产和贸易. 草业科学, 2017, 34(5): 1129-1135. | |
4 | Qi X D. Nutritional value and evaluation of oat in alpine pasture. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 31(4): 100-101. |
祁学东. 高寒牧区燕麦营养价值及其评价. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2012, 31(4): 100-101. | |
5 | Pan Q M, Xue J G, Tao J, et al. Current status of grassland degradation and measures for grassland restoration in northern China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(17): 1642-1650. |
潘庆民, 薛建国, 陶金, 等. 中国北方草原退化现状与恢复技术. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17): 1642-1650. | |
6 | Lin B Q, Chen W H, Jiang W B. Present situation and prospect of forage crop development in Hulunbuir. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2002(S1): 24-26. |
林宝奇, 陈文贺, 蒋万波. 呼伦贝尔市发展饲草作物的现状和前景. 内蒙古农业科技, 2002(S1): 24-26. | |
7 | Ding W Q, Li P, Yin Y T, et al. Vulnerability of herder households under the framework of sustainable livelihoods in the grassland of Northern China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(8): 1-11. |
丁文强, 李平, 尹燕亭, 等. 可持续生计视角下中国北方草原区牧户脆弱性评价研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 1-11. | |
8 | Perez H N, Diaz S, Garnier E, et al. New handbook for stand-ardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013, 61(3): 167-234. |
9 | Liang G L, Qin Y, Wei X X, et al. Evaluation on productivity and quality of oat strain I-D in the alpine regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(4): 917-927. |
梁国玲, 秦燕, 魏小星, 等. 青藏高原高寒区I-D燕麦品系饲草生产性能及品质评价. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 917-927. | |
10 | Guan Y X, Liu D, Zhang K C. Comparison of two kinds of nitrogen analyzers for determination of crude protein content in feed. Shanghai Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 181(3): 6-8. |
管姚香, 刘丹, 张克春. 两种定氮仪测定饲料粗蛋白含量的比较. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2012, 181(3): 6-8. | |
11 | Chen J Y, Huang L J, Jin X W, et al. Determination of crude fiber in feeds by filter bag fiber analyzer. China Feed, 2023, 721(5): 87-91. |
陈建勇, 黄丽俊, 金晓威, 等. 滤袋式纤维分析仪检测饲料中粗纤维. 中国饲料, 2023, 721(5): 87-91. | |
12 | Ling S L. Evaluation on the nutritional value of high-quality forage grass in desert steppe of Ordos by using RFV. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2014, 35(10): 15-16, 19. |
凌树礼. 应用RFV评价鄂尔多斯荒漠草原优势牧草营养价值. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2014, 35(10): 15-16, 19. | |
13 | Chen X, Wu B, Zhang Z W. Evaluation of adaptability and stability for important agronomic traits of oat (Avena spp.) germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(4): 577-585. |
陈新, 吴斌, 张宗文. 燕麦种质资源重要农艺性状适应性和稳定性评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4): 577-585. | |
14 | Liu G, Zhao G Q, Wei L M. Primary application of the entropy weight-based gray systematic theory to integrated evaluation of oat. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 156(3): 84-89. |
刘刚, 赵桂琴, 魏黎明. 基于熵权赋权法的灰色系统理论在燕麦品种综合评价中的应用. 中国草地学报, 2007, 156(3): 84-89. | |
15 | Hu D P. Study on adaptability of different Avena sativa varieties in Yanmenguan Pass area. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2016. |
胡东鹏. 雁门关地区不同饲用燕麦品种的适应性研究. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2016. | |
16 | Zhang W, Zhou Q P, Chen Y J, et al. Comparison of production performance and forage quality of ten introduced oat varieties in Hulunbuir, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(12): 129-142. |
张伟, 周青平, 陈有军, 等. 呼伦贝尔地区10个引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲草品质比较. 草业学报, 2021, 30(12): 129-142. | |
17 | Na Y, Wu R C, Li F, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance of 15 oat varieties in south bank of Yellow River in western Inner Mongolia. Feed Research, 2022, 45(24): 97-101. |
那亚, 乌仁曹, 李峰, 等. 15个燕麦品种在内蒙古西部黄河南岸地区生产性能综合评价. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(24): 97-101. | |
18 | Wang Y C, Song L, Zhang F F, et al. Comparative study on production performance of 10 oat varieties. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2): 254-263. |
王彦超, 宋磊, 张凡凡, 等. 不同燕麦品种生育期农艺性状、生产性能及品质的比较. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(2): 254-263. | |
19 | Wang X, Li M, Zheng Y H, et al. Study on introduced forage oat varieties. Grassland and Prataculture, 2016, 28(3): 34-42. |
王玺, 李敏, 郑轶慧, 等. 饲用燕麦适应性鉴定与评价. 草原与草业, 2016, 28(3): 34-42. | |
20 | Cao L X, Zhao S F, Zhao Y G, et al. Effects of variety diversity on yield stability of oat seeds in Bashang region of Hebei Province. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 43(2): 48-55. |
曹丽霞, 赵世峰, 赵艳格, 等. 品种多样性对冀北坝上地区燕麦种子产量稳定性的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(2): 48-55. | |
21 | Bai S S, Zhang W J, Wang Z F, et al. Investigation on the production and utilization of oat and rye forage in the Yellow River Delta. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2020(3): 63-68. |
柏杉杉, 张文娟, 王兆凤, 等. 黄河三角洲地区麦类饲草生产利用情况调研报告. 草学, 2020(3): 63-68. | |
22 | Zhang Y, Chen Z F, Zhang X N, et al. Influence of mowing time on yield and quality of spring and autumn sown oat hay. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(11): 124-135. |
张莹, 陈志飞, 张晓娜, 等. 不同刈割期对春播、秋播燕麦干草产量和品质的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11): 124-135. | |
23 | Wang W. Assessment of productive performance and nutritive value of 21 oat genotypes in western Jilin Province. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2016. |
王巍. 吉林省西部地区21个燕麦品种生产性能和营养价值评价. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2016. | |
24 | Gao Y M, Sa R N, Sun L L, et al. Preliminary study on introduction experiment of oats in Tongliao area of Inner Mongolia. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2017, 38(5): 32-35. |
高亚敏, 萨日娜, 孙琳丽, 等. 内蒙古通辽地区燕麦引种试验初步研究. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2017, 38(5): 32-35. | |
25 | Zhuang K Z, Wu R H, Zhang C Y, et al. Evaluation of productivity of 11 oat varieties in Lunan region. Crop Research, 2022, 36(4): 313-319, 326. |
庄克章, 吴荣华, 张春艳, 等. 11个饲用燕麦品种在鲁南地区的生产性能评价. 作物研究, 2022, 36(4): 313-319, 326. | |
26 | Duan L X, Ma X, Ju Z L, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction combined with organic fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of Avena sativa ‘Qinghai’. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 471-478. |
段连学, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 等. 减氮配施有机肥对‘青海甜燕麦’光合特性和产量的影响. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 471-478. | |
27 | Wang Q, Li Z J, Li J, et al. Evaluation of agronomic and forage quality traits of a range of oat cultivars. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 149-158. |
王茜, 李志坚, 李晶, 等. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 149-158. | |
28 | Zhou B W, Serret M D, Elazab A, et al. Wheat ear carbon assimilation and nitrogen remobilization contribute significantly to grain yield. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2016, 58(11): 914-926. |
29 | Chai J K, Zhao G Q, Hu K J, et al. Effect of eco-environment in different planting areas on oat nutritive value and hay production. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(3): 421-425, 476. |
柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 胡凯军, 等. 不同种植区生态环境对燕麦营养价值及干草产量的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(3): 421-425, 476. | |
30 | Yang Y G, Cheng T L, Yang X J, et al. Effects of different growth stages of three oat cultivars on the nutritive value of silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(4): 683-688. |
杨云贵, 程天亮, 杨雪娇, 等. 3个燕麦品种不同收获期对青贮饲草营养价值的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4): 683-688. |
[1] | Jie ZHAO, Heng-guang CHEN, Xiao-meng PEI, Hao YU, Yin-ying XU, Da-gan MAO. Effects of resveratrol supplementation in the perinatal diet on production performance, blood indexes, and transcript abundance of genes encoding inflammatory factors in goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 210-220. |
[2] | Qin FENG, Xiao-li HE, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Wang NI, Xia MA, Xue-hua MING, Jian-qiang DENG, Jian LAN. A study of mixed sowing effects for oat and common vetch in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. |
[3] | Yan LI, Fu-long MA, Lu HAN, Hai-zhen WANG. Productivity and adaptability of ‘WL’ alfalfa varieties with different fall dormancy in the extremely arid region of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 139-149. |
[4] | Wen-long LI, Feng LI, Zhong-juan ZHANG, Dian-qing WANG, Huan WANG, Hui-qing JIN, Mu-re TE, Zhi-ling HU, Ya TAO. A performance evaluation of two crops of forage oats per year in the northern Ordos Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 159-168. |
[5] | Jia-min ZHANG, Hao GUAN, Hai-ping LI, Zhi-feng JIA, Xiang MA, Wen-hui LIU, You-jun CHEN, Shi-yong CHEN, Yong-mei JIANG, Li GAN, Qing-ping ZHOU, Li-xue YANG. Effects of oat∶feed pea sowing ratio and lactic acid bacteria addition on crop silage fermentation and ruminal degradation characteristics of the resulting total mixed ration [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 169-181. |
[6] | Chun-yan REN, Guo-ling LIANG, Wen-hui LIU, Kai-qiang LIU, Jia-lei DUAN. Screening and adaptability evaluation of early maturing oats in alpine regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 116-129. |
[7] | Yong-hong SHI, Peng GAO, Zhi-hong FANG, Xiang ZHAO, Wei HAN, Jiang-ming WEI, Lin LIU, Jin-zhen LI. Evaluation of resistance to Colletotrichum cereale and analysis of loss in a field of fifteen imported oat cultivars [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 130-142. |
[8] | Cong-ze JIANG, Na SHOU, Wei GAO, Ren-shi MA, Yu-ying SHEN, Xian-long YANG. A multivariate evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different varieties of silage maize in the dry plateau area of Longdong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 216-228. |
[9] | Yi-dan YAN, Ying-ying NIE, Li-jun XU, Xing-fa GAO, Yan-zhang RAO, Xiong RAO, Hong-zhi ZHANG, Cha-shu ZHAO, Yan-ping ZHU, Yu-bo ZHU. Potential excavation and evaluation of functional oat varieties in winter fallow field of southwest mountainous area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 42-53. |
[10] | Li-li ZHU, Ye-meng ZHANG, Wan-cai LI, Ya-li ZHAO, Xiang LI, Zhi-guo CHEN. Adaption to the Plateau climate in Qinghai of 39 silage maize varieties cultivated in different ecological regions of China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 68-78. |
[11] | Teng-fei WANG, Bin WANG, Jian-qiang DENG, Man-you LI, Wang NI, Qin FENG, Yun-yun TUO, Jian LAN. Effect of sowing rate on yield and forage quality of a Dolichos lablab-Sorghum bicolor mixture under drip irrigation in arid areas of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 30-40. |
[12] | Jian-xin LIU, Rui-rui LIU, Xiu-li LIU, Xiao-bin OU, Hai-yan JIA, Ting BU, Na LI. Effects of exogenous hydrogen sulfide on amino acid metabolism in naked oat leaves under saline-alkali stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 119-130. |
[13] | Xue-ling YE, Zhen GAN, Yan WAN, Da-bing XIANG, Xiao-yong WU, Qi WU, Chang-ying LIU, Yu FAN, Liang ZOU. Advances and perspectives in forage oat breeding [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 160-177. |
[14] | Ming NAN, Xing-rong WANG, Jing LI, Yan-ming LIU, Cheng-jun ZHANG, Ji-kuan CHAI, Gui-qin ZHAO. Differences in traits related to lodging resistance among oat genotypes [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 106-118. |
[15] | Ya TAO, Li-jun XU, Feng LI, Wen-long LI, Qi-zhong SUN, Chang XU, Ke-jian LIN. The Leymus chinensis industry in China needs to be urgently revitalized [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 188-198. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||