不同轮作模式对后茬作物小麦产量及生理指标的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018086

草业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 59-66.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018086

不同轮作模式对后茬作物小麦产量及生理指标的影响

刘洪庆^{1, **}, 付丹丹^{2, **}, 武海杰¹, 苗福泓², 孙娟², 杨国锋^{1, *}

1.青岛农业大学生命科学院,山东青岛 266109;
2.青岛农业大学动物科技学院,山东青岛 266109

收稿日期:2018-01-31 修回日期:2018-05-24 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-08-20
通讯作者: E-mail:yanggf@qau.edu.cn
作者简介:刘洪庆(1963-),男,山东高唐人,副教授,博士。E-mail:liuhqcn2003@126.com。付丹丹(1994-),女,山东滕州人,在读硕士。E-mail:1357725640@qq.com。**共同第一作者These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
公益性行业科研专项(201403048),山东省现代农业技术体系创新团队(SDAIT-23-01,SDAIT-23-08)和国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34)资助

Effects of rotation systems on yields and physiological indicators of wheat

LIU Hong-qing^{1, **}, FU Dan-dan^{2, **}, WU Hai-jie¹, MIAO Fu-hong², SUN Juan², YANG Guo-feng^{1, *}

1.College of Life Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China;
2.College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China

Received:2018-01-31 Revised:2018-05-24 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究在前茬作物分别是种植4年的苜蓿田,玉米田,大豆田的情况下,研究了3种轮作模式(苜蓿-小麦;大豆-小麦;玉米-小麦)对其后茬作物小麦产量(籽粒产量、出籽率、地上部生物量)与小麦的生理指标(叶色值、叶面积指数、净光合速率、蒸腾速率、硝酸还原酶活性)之间的影响。结果表明:苜蓿-小麦轮作模式下比玉米、大豆轮作小麦模式会显著提高后茬作物小麦产量,而后2种模式在产量上差异不显著。苜蓿-小麦轮作模式显著改善小麦旗叶叶色值、叶面积指数,提高了小麦在灌浆期和成熟期的净光合速率、降低了在孕穗期的蒸腾速率;苜蓿-小麦轮作模式显著提高了小麦生长在整个生长期间的硝酸还原酶活性。说明此种轮作模式有利于改善后茬作物小麦对氮肥的利用率、提高其产量。

关键词: 苜蓿, 轮作模式, 小麦, 产量, 生理指标

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of three planting patterns (alfalfa-wheat, AW; soybean-wheat, SW; and corn-wheat, CW) on the yields (grain yield, seed production rate, and biomass of above ground parts) and physiological indicators (SPAD value, leaf area index, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, nitrate reductase activity) of wheat. The yield of wheat was significantly higher in AW than in SW and CW, and not significantly different between SW and CW. The SPAD value and leaf area index of flag leaves were significantly higher in AW than in SW and CW in every important period of wheat growth. The net photosynthetic rate of wheat was higher at the later filling and maturity stages, while the wheat transpiration rate significantly decreased at the booting stage. The activity of nitrate reductase was higher in AW than in SW and CW during the whole growing period of wheat. These results indicate that the AW pattern is suitable for optimal use of nitrogen fertilizer by wheat to improve its yields.

Key words: alfalfa, rotation pattern, wheat, yield, physiological indicators

刘洪庆, 付丹丹, 武海杰, 苗福泓, 孙娟, 杨国锋. 不同轮作模式对后茬作物小麦产量及生理指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 59-66.

LIU Hong-qing, FU Dan-dan, WU Hai-jie, MIAO Fu-hong, SUN Juan, YANG Guo-feng. Effects of rotation systems on yields and physiological indicators of wheat[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(8): 59-66.

参考文献

[1] Tong X X, Song X Y, Liu S T, et al . Effect of wheat-corn rotation tillers on leaf senescence physiological characteristics of corn during grouting and mature period. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(5): 954-960.
仝星星, 宋希云, 刘树堂, 等. 小麦-玉米轮作耕作方式对玉米灌浆成熟期叶片衰老生理特性的影响. 核农学报, 2015, 29(5): 954-960.
[2] Hao X Y, Ma X Z, Gao Z C, et al . Variation characteristics of fractions of active nitrogen and organic nitrogen under different long-term fertilization practices in black soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(23): 4707-4716.
郝小雨, 马星竹, 高中超, 等. 长期施肥下黑土活性氮和有机氮组分变化特征. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(23): 4707-4716.
[3] Yu R X, Zhang W H. Harm of fertilizer overuse and its countermeasures. Friends of Rich Farmers, 2012, (13): 50.
于日新, 张文辉. 化肥过量使用的危害及对策. 农民致富之友, 2012, (13): 50.
[4] Wang C J, Xiao J, Cai A D, et al . Capacity and characteristics of soil microbial biomass under various climate and fertilization conditions across China croplands. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(6): 1067-1075.
王传杰, 肖婧, 蔡岸冬, 等. 不同气候与施肥条件下农田土壤微生物生物量特征与容量分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(6): 1067-1075.
[5] Nie H, Li L Y. Discussion on the problem of food security in China. Agricultural Development and Equipment, 2017, (11): 112.
聂海, 李琳英. 我国粮食安全生产问题探讨. 农业开发与装备, 2017, (11): 112.
[6] Ren J Z, Nan Z B, Lin H L. Securing food (including food) with food system-implementing grassland farming, fully developing production potential of food system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14(3): 1-10.
任继周, 南志标, 林慧龙. 以食物系统保证食物(含粮食)安全—实行草地农业,全面发展食物系统生产潜力. 草业学报, 2005, 14(3): 1-10.
[7] Ren J Z, Lin H L. The meaning of farmland equivalence and the revealed food production potential of land resources in China-a new dimension of evaluation of food production capacity of a land resource and its application in China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2006, 15(5): 1-10.
任继周, 林慧龙. 农田当量的涵义及其所揭示的我国土地资源的食物生产潜力—一个土地资源的食物生产能力评价的新量纲及其在我国的应用. 草业学报, 2006, 15(5): 1-10.
[8] He M Y. Introducing grassland into the fields and withdrawing grain and grasses to make strategic adjustments to the agricultural structure. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2015, (23): 79-80.
贺明艳. 引草入田退粮种草实现农业结构的战略性调整. 当代畜牧, 2015, (23): 79-80.
[9] Hu X D. Reflections and suggestions about adjustment of “silage corn to forage”planting structure. Price Theory and Practice, 2017, (2): 19-20.
胡向东. 关于“粮改饲”种植结构调整的思考. 价格理论与实践, 2017, (2): 19-20.
[10] Zhang Q X, Cui Z, Gao W. The brief introduction of Jiaozhou. Ji’nan: China Intercontinental Press, 2002, 9: 512.
张启勋, 崔章, 高巍. 胶州简志. 济南: 五洲传播出版社, 2002, 9: 512.
[11] Xing J, Tian L Z. Survey of wheat production methods. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 17(8): 94-95.
邢君,田灵芝. 小麦测产方法综述. 安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(8): 94-95.
[12] Wei H B. Application of measuring methods of maize yield. Modern Agriculture, 2013, (9): 43.
韦海斌. 玉米产量测定方法的应用探讨. 现代农业, 2013, (9): 43.
[13] Zheng C H. How to measure the leaf area index of wheat by fresh weight method. Journal of Botany, 1976, (1): 19.
郑春和. 怎样用鲜重法测定小麦的叶面积指数. 植物学杂志, 1976, (1): 19.
[14] Zhan H X, Chang Z J, Wei A L, et al . Impact of drought to wheat physiological index. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(10): 1049-1051.
詹海仙, 畅志坚, 魏爱丽, 等. 干旱胁迫对小麦生理指标的影响. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(10): 1049-1051.
[15] Zhang X C, Shangguan Z P. Effects of nitrogen application rate on nitrate reductase activity, nitric oxide content and gas exchange in winter wheat leaves. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(7): 1447-1452.
张绪成, 上官周平. 施氮量对小麦叶片硝酸还原酶活性、一氧化氮含量和气体交换的影响. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(7): 1447-1452.
[16] Wang L, Jiang C Q, Liao Z, et al . Determination of total nitrogen in tobacco and tobacco products by Dumas determination of nitrogen. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part B: Chemical Analysis, 2014, 50(3): 388-389.
王岚, 蒋次清, 廖臻, 等. 杜马斯定氮法测定烟草及烟草制品中总氮含量. 理化检验(化学分册), 2014, 50(3): 388-389.
[17] Liu J Y. Physiology experiment course of plant. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010.
刘家尧. 植物生理学实验教程. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
[18] Chen S, Zheng X, Wang D Y, et al . Effect of long-term paddy-upland yearly rotations on rice ( Oryza sativa ) yield, soil properties, and bacteria community diversity. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/279641.
[19] Ren J Z, Hou F J. Grassland agricultural system is an important guarantee of food safety-reflection on “melamine milk powder” incident. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(8): 6-9.
任继周, 侯扶江. 草地农业系统是食品安全的重要保证——关于“三聚氰胺奶粉”事件的反思. 草业科学, 2009, 26(8): 6-9.
[20] Hu D Y, Mao G L, Xu X. Effects of different grass-crop rotation on edaphon and enzyme activity in soil. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(9): 106-113.
虎德钰, 毛桂莲, 许兴. 不同草田轮作方式对土壤微生物和土壤酶活性的影响. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(9): 106-113.
[21] Li J K. Analysis of roles of caotian rotary wheel in promoting animal husbandry development in Jingyuan. Gansu Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2017, 47(1): 114-115.
李建奎. 草田轮作在促进靖远畜牧业发展中的作用分析. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2017, 47(1): 114-115.
[22] Wang Q S, Xu J, Fan G Q, et al . Effect of nitrogen strategies on dry matter accumulation and yield of wheat in Sichuan hilly areas based on “three combination structure”. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(10): 1369-1376.
王强生, 徐娟, 樊高琼, 等. 基于“三合结构”分析氮肥运筹对四川丘陵旱地小麦物质生产及产量形成的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(10): 1369-1376.
[23] Gao H T, Wang Y H, Meng Z Y, et al . Study on grain yield and physiological characteristics of flag leaves in super high yield winter wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(6): 1080-1084.
高海涛, 王育红, 孟战赢, 等. 超高产小麦产量及旗叶生理特性的研究. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(6): 1080-1084.
[24] Wu X L, Tang Y L, Li C S, et al . Individual and combined effects of soil waterlogging and compaction on physiological characteristics of wheat in southwestern China. Field Crops Research, 2018, 215: 163-172.
[25] Abid M, Tian Z W, Ata-Ul-Karim S T, et al . Nitrogen nutrition improves the potential of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) to alleviate the effects of drought stress during vegetative growth periods. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 981.
[26] Li S X, Wang Z H, Stewart B A. Responses of crop plants to ammonium and nitrate N. Advances in Agronomy, 2013, 118: 205-397.

不同轮作模式对后茬作物小麦产量及生理指标的影响

Effects of rotation systems on yields and physiological indicators of wheat

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴勇, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 童长春. 河西荒漠灌区紫花苜蓿施肥效应及其基于数据包络分析法的经济效益研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 94-105.
[2]	于晓波, 梁建秋, 何泽民, 周全卢, 吴海英, 张明荣. 撒播量对大豆茎秆特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 117-124.
[3]	邢易梅, 蕫理, 战力峰, 才华, 杨圣秋, 孙娜. 混合接种摩西球囊霉和根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿耐碱能力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 136-145.
[4]	覃凤飞, 李志华, 刘信宝, 渠晖, 平措卓玛, 洛松群措, 苏梦涵. 外源2,4表油菜素内酯对越夏期高温与弱光胁迫下紫花苜蓿生长和光合性能的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 146-160.
[5]	童长春, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 于铁峰. 基于平衡施肥的紫花苜蓿光合特性及光合因子的产量效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 70-80.
[6]	再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 吐尔逊·吐尔洪, 涂振东, 王卉, 山其米克, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪. 长期不同施肥处理对连作高粱生长规律及产量的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 81-92.
[7]	陆姣云, 熊军波, 张鹤山, 田宏, 杨惠敏, 刘洋. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿产量、品质和微量元素的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 126-133.
[8]	张宇君, 尚以顺, 王普昶, 丁磊磊, 张文, 邹超. 干旱胁迫下保水剂对盘江白刺花幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 90-98.
[9]	胡月秋, 徐开未, 龙玲, 蒋帆, 周元, 邱传志, 李建兵, 陈远学. 玉米“正红6号”的密植效应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 154-162.
[10]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 牛伊宁, 蔡立群, 谢军红. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27-38.
[11]	杨叶华, 张松, 王帅, 刘正兰, 方林发, 张学良, 刘瑞, 张建伟, 张宇亭, 石孝均. 中国不同区域常见绿肥产量和养分含量特征及替代氮肥潜力评估[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 39-55.
[12]	张梨梨, 史敏, 李彦忠. 炭疽病对沙尔沁地区苜蓿产量和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 117-126.
[13]	杨宁, 马绍英, 马蕾, 张旭辉, 王娜, 李胜, 柴强. 重茬豌豆幼苗对接种复合根瘤菌的生理响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 144-152.
[14]	娄芬, 李小冬, 尚以顺, 吴佳海, 张蓉, 甘小波, 熊俊, 陈光吉, 李世歌, 裴成江. 毕节地区适宜青贮玉米品种(系)筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 214-224.
[15]	伏兵哲, 周燕飞, 李雪, 倪彪, 高雪芹. 宁夏引黄灌区羊草水肥耦合效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 98-108.