甘肃荒漠灌区播量和行距对紫花苜蓿营养价值的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018426

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 播量和行距是实现紫花苜蓿高产和优质的重要栽培技术措施。为此,采用裂区设计,以播量(12.0、16.0、20.0、24.0 kg·hm^-2)为主处理,3个等行距(10、15、20 cm)和2个不等行距(60 cm+40 cm间距、60 cm+30 cm间距,60 cm即种植6行,行距10 cm)为副处理,连续3年在甘肃荒漠灌区研究播量和行距对紫花苜蓿叶茎比和营养价值的影响。结果表明,播量和行距对叶茎比无显著影响,对营养价值有一定影响。其中粗蛋白、粗脂肪、钙和磷含量随播量、行距的增加呈先增加后降低趋势,3年平均粗蛋白含量在播量为16.0 kg·hm^-2,行距为20 cm时最高(20.06%),粗脂肪含量在播量为16.0 kg·hm^-2,行距为15 cm时最大(3.42%),钙含量在播量为20.0 kg·hm^-2,行距为20 cm时达到峰值(1.65%),磷含量在播量分别为12.0、16.0和20.0 kg·hm^-2,行距均为20 cm时最高(0.19%);中性、酸性洗涤纤维含量随播量增加呈降低趋势,随行距增加呈增加趋势,且中性洗涤纤维含量在播量为24.0 kg·hm^-2,行距为10 cm时最低(31.74%),酸性洗涤纤维含量在播量为24.0 kg·hm^-2,行距为15 cm时最小(25.64%);相对饲喂价值随播量的增加呈增大趋势,随行距的增加呈先升高后降低趋势,其值在播量为16.0 kg·hm^-2,行距为20 cm时最高(208.64%)。相同播量和行距下,紫花苜蓿营养价值受生长年限的影响。综合分析结果显示,播量为20.0 kg·hm^-2、行距为20 cm是该地区的最佳播量和行距,有利于提高紫花苜蓿的营养价值。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 荒漠灌区, 叶茎比, 灰色关联度分析

Abstract: Seeding rate and row spacing are important cultivation details for alfalfa (Medicago sativa) need to be optimized to achieve high crop yield and forage quality. Therefore, an experiment to investigate the effect of seeding rate and row spacing on alfalfa performance was carried out in the arid oasis region of Gansu Province from 2014 to 2017. The experiment comprised four seeding rates (12.0, 16.0, 20.0 and 24.0 kg·ha^-1) arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates, and three equal row spacings (10, 15, 20 cm) and two wide-narrow row spacings (60 cm+40 cm, and 60 cm+30 cm) randomly arranged as split plot treatments within the main plots. In wide-narrow row spacings, groups of 6 rows with a narrow spacing of 10 cm were separated by a wider spacing of 30 cm or 40 cm. It was found that seeding rate and row spacing did not have any significant effect on leaf∶stem ratio, but significantly affected nutritional parameters of alfalfa forage. Across the range of seeding rates and row spacings, herbage ether extract, calcium, and phosphorus contents were highest at intermediate plant densities. Crude protein content was highest (20.06%) at the 16.0 kg·ha^-1 seeding rate and 20 cm row spacing combination, while the highest ether extract content (3.42%) was obtained at the 16.0 kg·ha^-1 seeding rate with 15 cm row spacing. Calcium content was maximized (1.65%) at the 20 kg·ha^-1 seeding rate and 20 cm row spacing, and phosphorus (P) content was maximized (0.19%) at the 3 lower seeding rates (12.0, 16.0 and 20.0 kg·ha^-1) and row spacing of 20 cm. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents decreased with increasing seeding rates, while the NDF and ADF contents increased with increasing row spacings, and the lowest average NDF content (31.74%) was obtained at the 24.0 kg·ha^-1 seeding rate and 10 cm row spacing. The lowest ADF content (25.64%) was obtained at the 24.0 kg·ha^-1 seeding rate and 15 cm row spacing. The relative feed value (RFV) increased with increasing seeding rates and was highest at medium row spacings. Lastly, relative feed value was maximized (208.64%) at the 16.0 kg·ha^-1 seeding rate and 20 cm row spacing. The nutritional values of alfalfa herbage different between growing years at the same seeding rate and row spacing. It was indicated from comprehensive evaluation of the main nutrients, that the optimal planting configuration for improving alfalfa nutritional value in this climate was a seeding rate of 20.0 kg·ha^-1 and row spacing of 20 cm.

Key words: alfalfa, arid oasis region, leaf:stem ratio, grey relational analysis

南丽丽, 师尚礼, 郭全恩, 白小明. 甘肃荒漠灌区播量和行距对紫花苜蓿营养价值的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1): 108-119.

NAN Li-li, SHI Shang-li, GUO Quan-en, BAI Xiao-ming. Effects of seeding rate and row spacing on nutritional value of alfalfa in the arid oasis region of Gansu Province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(1): 108-119.

参考文献

[1] Liu Y N, Shi Y H, Yan X B, et al. Effect of alfalfa hay substituting for part of the concentrate, on the production of cows and economic profit. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(6): 190-197.
刘艳娜, 史莹华, 严学兵, 等. 苜蓿青干草替代部分精料对奶牛生产性能及经济效益的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 190-197.
[2] Chao D L, Wang J M.The current situation and development trend of Medicago spp. grass industry in Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(2): 327-330.
晁德林, 王俊梅. 甘肃苜蓿产业化存在的主要问题和发展趋势. 草业科学, 2011, 28(2): 327-330.
[3] Dong Z, Shen X Y.Overall review of crop cultivation. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000.
董钻, 沈秀瑛. 作物栽培学总论. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[4] Stout D G.Effect of high lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) sowing rates on establishment year yield, stand persistent and forage quality. Journal Agronomy Crop Science, 1998, 180(1): 39-43.
[5] Hansen L H, Krueger C R.Effect of establishment method variety and seeding rate on the production and quality of alfalfa under dryland and irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 1973, 65(5): 755-759.
[6] Cooper C S, Ditterline R L, Welty L E.Seed size and seeding rate effects upon stand density and yield of alfalfa. Agronomy Journal, 1979, 71(1): 83-85.
[7] Volenec J J, Cherney J H, Johnson K D.Yield components, plant morphology, and forage quality of alfalfa as influenced by plant population. Crop Science, 1987, 27(2): 321-326.
[8] Yu Y C, Zhao Y H, Guo H J, et al. Effect of alfalfa sowing quantity in autumn on fresh yield in the second year. Acta Ecologae Animalis Domastici, 2007, 28(5): 86-88.
余有成, 赵永宏, 郭海俊, 等. 播种量对秋播苜蓿越年草产量的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2007, 28(5): 86-88.
[9] Liu D X, Liu G H, Yang Z M.The effects of planting and harvesting factors on hay yield and stem-leaf ratio of Medicago sativa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(3): 48-57.
刘东霞, 刘贵河, 杨志敏. 种植及收获因子对紫花苜蓿干草产量和茎叶比的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 48-57.
[10] Sun S X, Mao H M, Bi Y F.Study of the experiment of cultivation for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009, 11: 210-211.
孙仕仙, 毛华明, 毕玉芬. 苜蓿栽培试验研究. 现代农业科技, 2009, 11: 210-211.
[11] Chai F J, Gao H J, Liu Z D, et al. Study on high yield and high efficiency alfalfa grassland construction in the mining area of Daqing Oilfield. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2013, 19: 85-86.
柴凤久, 高海娟, 刘泽东, 等. 大庆油田采矿区高产高效苜蓿草地建植的研究. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2013, 19: 85-86.
[12] Liu X J, Zhang J X, Li W Q, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition and cuttings on yield and quality of alfalfa in dry region of Gansu. China Journal of Desert Research, 2014, 34(6): 1516-1526.
刘晓静, 张进霞, 李文卿, 等. 施肥及刈割对干旱地区紫花苜蓿产量和品质的影响. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(6): 1516-1526.
[13] Wei Y P, Nan L L, Yu C, et al. Row spacing and density effects on the yield and quality of Medicago sativa. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(9): 1898-1905.
魏永鹏, 南丽丽, 于闯, 等. 种植密度和行距配置对紫花苜蓿群体产量及品质的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 34(9): 1898-1905.
[14] Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Method for the determination of crude protein in feedstuffs, GB/6432-94. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1994.
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料粗蛋白质测定方法, GB/6432-94. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1994.
[15] Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of neutral detergent fiber in feedstuffs, GB/T 2080-2006. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006.
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中中性洗涤纤维的测定, GB/T 2080-2006. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
[16] Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of acid detergent fiber in feedstuffs, NY/T 1459-2007. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.
中华人民共和国农业部. 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定, NY/T 1459-2007. 北京: 农业出版社, 2007.
[17] Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of crude fat in feeds, GB/T 6433-2006. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006.
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中粗脂肪的测定, GB/T 6433-2006. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
[18] Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of calcium in feed, GB/T 6436-2002. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2002.
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中钙的测定, GB/T 6436-2002. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002.
[19] Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of phosphorus in feed-spectphotometry, GB/T 6437-2002. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2002.
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中总磷的测定, GB/T 6437-2002. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002.
[20] Zhang J K, Lu D X, Liu J X, et al. The present research situation and progress of crude fodder quality evaluation index. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(9): 55-61.
张吉鹍, 卢德勋, 刘建新, 等. 粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展. 草业科学, 2004, 21(9): 55-61.
[21] Ke M, Zhu H, Liang W W, et al. Grey correlation analysis of main agronomic characters and its yield and quality traits in Sorghum sudanense. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(5): 949-955.
柯梅, 朱昊, 梁维维, 等. 苏丹草农艺性状与产量、品质间的灰色关联度分析. 草业科学, 2016, 33(5): 949-955.
[22] Tian B, Ran X Q, Xue H, et al. Evaluation of the nutritive value of 42 kinds of forage in Guizhou Province by grey relational grade analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 23(1): 92-103.
田兵, 冉雪琴, 薛红, 等. 贵州42种野生牧草营养价值灰色关联度分析. 草业科学, 2014, 23(1): 92-103.
[23] Julier B, Huyghe C, Ecalle C.Within- and among-cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa: Forage quality, morphology, and yield. Crop Science, 2000, 40(2): 365-369.
[24] Miliĉ D, Karagiĉ D, Vasiljeviĉ S, et al. Leaf and stem chemical composition of divergent alfalfa cultivars. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 2011, 27(4): 1505-1511.
[25] Zhao H M, Wu R X, Li Y, et al. Dynamic analyzing on the production performance of alfalfa between different cutting times and years. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1349-1357.
赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 李源, 等. 紫花苜蓿不同茬次及年际间生产性能的动态规律. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1349-1357.
[26] Wang Y H, Wang C Z, Li D F, et al. Effects of seeding rate on plant number, production performance, and quality of alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(2): 123-135.
王彦华, 王成章, 李德锋, 等. 播种量和品种对紫花苜蓿植株动态变化、产量及品质的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 123-135.
[27] Kazemi M, Tahmasbi A M, Naserian A A, et al. Potential nutritive value of some forage species used as ruminants feed in Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, (11): 12110-12117.
[28] Katiĉ S, Miliĉ D, Karagiĉ D, et al. Variation of protein, cellulose and mineral content of lucerne as influenced by cultivar and cut. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 2009, 25(5/6): 1189-1195.
[29] Chen Y, Wang Z S, Zhang X M, et al. Analysis of the nutritional components and feeding values of commonly used roughages. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(5): 117-125.
陈艳, 王之盛, 张晓明, 等. 常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析. 草业学报, 2015, 24(5): 117-125.
[30] Bolger T P, Meyer D W.Influence of plant density on alfalfa yield and quality, pp. 37-41. In Proc. Am. Forage and Grassl. Council, Eau Claire, WI. 23-26 Jan.1983. Am. Forage and Grassl. Council, Lexington, KY.
[31] Lloveras J, Chocarro C, Freixes O, et al. Yield, yield components, and forage nutritive value of alfalfa as affected by seeding rate under irrigated conditions. Agronomy Journal, 2008, 100(1): 191-197.
[32] Stanisavljeviĉ R, Tomiĉ Z, Lugiĉ Z, et al. Yield and nutritive value of alfalfa cultivars sown at different densities. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 2008, 24(3/4): 147-156.
[33] Celebi S Z, Kaya L, Sahar A K, et al. Effects of the weed density on grass yield of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in different row spacing applications. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 9(41): 6867-6872.
[34] Sun W B, Feng G G, Ma H L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of different alfalfa varieties by grey correlation degree method in desert oasis irrigation area and semi-arid irrigation area in Gansu. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2017, 52(5): 73-82.
孙万斌, 冯刚刚, 马晖玲, 等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种在甘肃荒漠绿洲灌区和半干旱灌区的灰色关联度综合评价. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017, 52(5): 73-82.
[35] Sun W B, Ma H L, Hou X Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of 20 alfalfa cultivars in two ecological areas of Gansu Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 161-174.
孙万斌, 马晖玲, 侯向阳, 等. 20个紫花苜蓿品种在甘肃两个地区的生产性能及营养价值综合评价. 草业学报, 2017, 26(3): 161-174.