西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018300

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 121-131.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018300

西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究

张光雨¹, 马和平¹, 邵小明^2,4, 王江伟^3,4,5, 沈振西^3,4,*, 付刚^3,4

1.西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所,西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室,西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,西藏林芝 860000;
2.中国农业大学资源与环境学院,生物多样性与有机农业北京市重点实验室,北京 100093;
3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,拉萨高原生态系统研究站,北京 100101;
4.西藏高原草业工程技术研究中心,西藏拉萨 850000;
5.中国科学院大学,北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-05-08 修回日期:2018-08-27 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-05-20
通讯作者: E-mail: shenzx@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:张光雨(1992-),男,河北衡水人,在读硕士。E-mail: zhanggy0425@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0502005)和西藏科技重大专项(牧草种质改良与利用重大专项)资助

A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the Valley region of Tibet, China

ZHANG Guang-yu¹, MA He-ping¹, SHAO Xiao-ming^2,4, WANG Jiang-wei^3,4,5, SHEN Zhen-xi^3,4,*, FU Gang^3,4

1.Institute of Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Laboratory of forest ecology in Plateau Area, Tibet Autonomous Region, Nation Key Station of Field Scientific Observation and Experiment, Linzhi 860000, China;
2.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Agricultural, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China;
3.Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
4.Engineering and Technology Research Center for Prataculture on the Xizang Plateau, Lhasa 850000, China;
5.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2018-05-08 Revised:2018-08-27 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-05-20
Contact: E-mail:shenzx@igsnrr.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了筛选出适合在西藏河谷区种植的燕麦品种,本研究通过田间试验测定了9个燕麦品种的产量和营养品质。参试的燕麦品种为阿坝燕麦、青引1号、青引2号、青海444、青燕1号、林纳、边锋、加燕2号和青海甜燕麦,于2016年5月8日播种,小区面积为3 m×4 m,设3次重复。对9个燕麦品种抽穗期、孕穗期和成熟期的鲜重、干重、干鲜比、株高和叶茎比以及成熟期的营养品质[粗蛋白(CP)、粗脂肪(EE)、粗灰分(Ash)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、木质素(ADL)]进行测定。成熟期的地上部干重结果表明,青燕1号、林纳、边锋和加燕2号的产量均大于26000 kg·hm^-2,青引1号、青引2号、青海444和青海甜燕麦产量为2200026000 kg·hm^-2,阿坝燕麦产量低于22000 kg·hm^-2。9个燕麦品种的CP、EE、Ash、ADF、NDF、ADL含量的变化范围分别为4.5%7.2%、21.7%57.3%、4.5%5.7%、24.9%35.4%、58.2%80.5%和30.6%42.0%,营养品质结果表明,青燕1号、青引2号和加燕2号的CP含量显著低于其他品种(P<0.05);边锋的NDF含量显著低于其他品种(P<0.05),青海甜燕麦含量最高;青海444的EE含量显著高于其他品种(P<0.05)。应用灰色关联度理论方法对9个燕麦品种的产量与营养品质指标进行综合分析得出,青海444、青燕1号和阿坝燕麦较其他燕麦品种更适宜在该地区种植推广。

关键词: 西藏河谷地区, 燕麦, 生产性能, 营养品质, 灰色关联度

Abstract: A field experiment measuring yield and nutritive value was conducted to select oat varieties suitable for cultivation in the Valley region of Tibet. Varieties tested were: Aba, Qingyin No.1, Qingyin No.2, Qinghai 444, Qingyan No.1, Linna, Bianfeng, Jiayan No.2, and Qinghai sweet oat; these were planted on 8th May 2016 in 3 m×4 m plots with 3 replicates. Yield measurements included fresh weight, dry weight (DW), dry matter%, plant height, leaf/stem, and nutritional quality of the nine varieties at heading, booting and maturity stages. Nutritive value measurements included crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude ash (Ash), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and lignin (ADL), measured at maturity. For above-ground DW at maturity, the varieties could be divided into groups of high yield (>26 t·ha^-1; Qingyan No.2, Linna, Bianfeng, and Jiayan No.2), medium yield (22-26 t·ha^-1; Qingyin1 No.1, Qingyin No.2, Qinghai 444, and Qinghai sweet oat), and low yield (<22 t·ha^-1; Aba). With respect to the nutritional quality results, the ranges observed for CP, EE, Ash, ADF, NDF, and ADL content were, respectively, 4.5%-7.2%, 21.7%-57.3%, 4.5%-5.7%, 24.9%-35.4%, 58.2%-80.5% and 30.6%-42.0%. Among variety differences in nutritive value observed were: CP, Qingyan No.1, Qingyin No.2 and Jiayan No.2 significantly lower than other varieties; ADF, Bianfeng lower and Qinghai sweet oat higher than others; NDF, Bianfeng higher and Linna lower than other varieties; EE, Qinghai 444 higher than other varieties. Based on grey relational analysis of yields and nutritional quality, it was concluded that Qinghai 444, Qingyan No.1 and Aba oats are the best performing varieties in this region.

Key words: Valley Aera of Tibet, oat, production performance, nutritional quality, grey relational analysis

张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 王江伟, 沈振西, 付刚. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 121-131.

ZHANG Guang-yu, MA He-ping, SHAO Xiao-ming, WANG Jiang-wei, SHEN Zhen-xi, FU Gang. A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the Valley region of Tibet, China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 121-131.

参考文献

[1] Yang C Y, Shen W S, Wang T.Spatial-temporal characteristics of cultivated land in Tibet in recent 30 years. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(1): 264-271.
杨春艳, 沈渭寿, 王涛. 近30年西藏耕地面积时空变化特征. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(1): 264-271.
[2] Shang Z H, Ji Q M.Discussion on the development of crop-grass system in the "Three Rivers" region of Tibet. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(8): 141-146.
尚占环, 姬秋梅. 西藏“一江两河” 农区草业发展探讨. 草业科学, 2009, 26(8): 141-146.
[3] Fu G, Shen Z, Sun W, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of experimental warming on plant physiology and growth on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2015, 34(1): 57-65.
[4] Zhong Z, Shen Z, Fu G.Response of soil respiration to experimental warming in a highland barley of the Tibet. Springer Plus, 2016, 5: 137.
[5] Zhao X Y, Wan W Y, Wang W J.Impact of climate change on potential productivity and phenological phase of forage in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in the past 50 years. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(4): 532-543.
赵雪雁, 万文玉, 王伟军.近50年气候变化对青藏高原牧草生产潜力及物候期的影响. 中国生态农业学报. 2016, 24(4): 532-543.
[6] Qu G P.The investigation on the introduction of herbage and forage crop in agricultural area of Tibetan. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012.
曲广鹏. 西藏农区牧草和饲草作物引种试验研究. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
[7] Cui G W, Li B, Wang M J, et al. Development status existing problems and their solutions of artificial pasture in Tibet. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2015, 11(21): 137-138.
崔国文, 李冰, 王明君, 等. 西藏人工草地的发展现状、存在问题及解决途径. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2015, 11(21): 137-138.
[8] Zhang X Z, He Y T, Sheng Z X, et al. Frontier of the ecological construction support the sustainable development in Tibet autonomous region. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015, 30(3): 306-312.
张宪洲, 何永涛, 沈振西, 等. 西藏地区可持续发展面临的主要生态环境问题及对策. 中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(3): 306-312.
[9] Vierstra R D, Langan S M, Haas A L.Purification and initial characterization of ubiquitin from the higher plant, Avena sativa. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1985, 260(22): 12015-12021.
[10] Ebbs S D, Kochian L V.Phytoextraction of zinc by oat (Avena sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(6): 802-806.
[11] Ni M Z X, Yu D L, Bian B, et al. Tibet produce oat of status and effect on stack breeding. Tibet Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 30(3): 36-39.
尼玛扎西, 禹代林, 边巴, 等. 燕麦在西藏畜牧业生产中的地位与作用. 西藏农业科技, 2008, 30(3): 36-39.
[12] Fu G, Shen Z X, Zhong Z M.Initial response of normalized difference vegetation index, green normalized difference vegetation index and soil adjusted vegetation index to infrared warming in highland barley of the Tibet. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(3): 365-371.
付刚, 沈振西, 钟志明. 西藏高原青稞三种植被指数对红外增温的初始响应. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(3): 365-371.
[13] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of The People’s Republic of China. Determination of acid detergent fiber in feedstuff, NY/T 1459-2007. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
中华人民共和国农业部. 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定, NY/T 1459-2007. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[14] Yang S.Analysis of feed and assay methodology of feed quality. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1999: 19-61.
杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999: 19-61.
[15] Deng J L.Grey control system. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1982, 10(3): 9-18.
邓聚龙. 灰色控制系统. 华中工学院学报, 1982, 10(3): 9-18.
[16] Hou J J, Zhao G Q, Jiao T, et al. Evaluation on adaptability of six Avena varieties in Xiahe County, Gansu Province. Grassland and Turf, 2013, 33(2): 26-32.
侯建杰, 赵桂琴, 焦婷, 等. 6个燕麦品种(系)在甘肃夏河地区的适应性评价. 草原与草坪, 2013, 33(2): 26-32.
[17] Jing M L, Ma Y S, Li S X, et al. Introduction experiment on eight kinds of oats in Qilian Mountain area. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2015, 45(5): 13-14.
景美玲, 马玉寿, 李世雄, 等. 8种燕麦在祁连山区的引种试验. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2015, 45(5): 13-14.
[18] Yang H L, Xu C L, Yu X J, et al. Comparative study on the performance of 14 oat (Avena sativa) germplasm in Huangcheng Town of Sunan County, Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1): 129-135.
杨海磊, 徐长林, 鱼小军, 等. 14份燕麦种质在肃南皇城镇的生产性能比较. 草业科学, 2016, 33(1): 129-135.
[19] Ma L, Zhou Q P, Yan H B, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and super absorbent polymers on yield of Avena sativa cv. Qingyan No.1. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(10): 1929-1934.
马力, 周青平, 颜红波, 等. 氮肥与保水剂配施对青燕1号燕麦产量的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(10): 1929-1934.
[20] Gao Y M, Sa R N, Sun L L, et al. Preliminary study on introduction experiment of oats in Tongliao, Inner Mongolia. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2017, 38(5): 32-35.
高亚敏, 萨日娜, 孙琳丽, 等. 内蒙古通辽地区燕麦引种试验初步研究. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2017, 38(5): 32-35.
[21] Wang W.Assessment of productive performance and nutritive value of 21 oat genotypes in western Jilin Province. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2016.
王巍. 吉林省西部地区21个燕麦品种生产性能和营养价值评价. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2016.
[22] Liu G.The integrated evaluation and filtration of oat germplasm in Tibetan Plateau. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2006.
刘刚. 青藏高原饲用燕麦种质资源评价与筛选. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2006.
[23] Sun J P, Dong K H, Kuai X Y, et al. Comparison of productivity and feeding value of introduced oat varieties in the agro-pasture ecotone of northern Shanxi. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11): 222-230.
孙建平, 董宽虎, 蒯晓妍, 等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较. 草业学报, 2017, 26(11): 222-230.
[24] Zhou Q P, Yan H B, Liang G L, et al. Analysis of the forage and gain productivity of oat cultivars. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 120-130.
周青平, 颜红波, 梁国玲, 等. 不同燕麦品种饲草和籽粒生产性能分析. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 120-130.
[25] Zhang Q P, Tian L H, Jiang H L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance of annual forage crops in Longdong Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(2): 25-28.
张清平, 田莉华, 蒋海亮, 等. 甘肃陇东黄土高原一年生饲草生产性能综合评价研究. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(2): 25-28.
[26] Chai J K, Zhao G Q, Hu K J, et al. Effect of eco-environment in different planting areas on oat nutritive value and hay production. Acta Agrectir Sinica, 2010, 18(3): 421-425.
柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 胡凯军, 等. 不同种植区生态环境对燕麦营养价值及干草产量的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(3): 421-425.
[27] Han W X, Yao T, Xi L Q, et al. PGPR bio-fertilizers producing and its effect on Avena sativa growth and quality development. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(2): 75-84.
韩文星, 姚拓, 席琳乔, 等. PGPR菌肥制作及其对燕麦生长和品质影响的研究. 草业学报, 2008, 17(2): 75-84.
[28] Wang Q L, Hua L M, Yang S W.Effect of different drying methods on dehydration and nutrients of oats in different growth periods. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(4): 92-98.
王巧玲, 花立民, 杨思维. 不同干燥方式对不同生育期燕麦失水和营养成分的影响. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(4): 92-98.
[29] Guo X, Jie X L, Hu H F, et al. Effects of basal Se fertilizers on nutrition values of naked oats. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 53-59.
郭孝, 介晓磊, 胡华锋, 等. 基施硒肥对裸燕麦营养水平的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 53-59.
[30] Wu J X, Chen Y L, He J G, et al. Biotechnology and its application on quality improvement for forage grasses. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2007, 16(1): 1-9.
吴金霞, 陈彦龙, 何近刚, 等. 生物技术在牧草品质改良中的应用. 草业学报, 2007, 16(1): 1-9.
[31] Campbell C A, Davidson H R.Effect of temperature, nitrogen fertilization and moisture stress on yield, yield components, protein content and moisture use efficiency of Manitou spring wheat. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1979, 86(2): 76-78.
[32] Xu S X, Zhao X Q, Sun P, et al. A study on acid detergent lignin content and digestibility of 5 species herbage in Tibetan Plateau. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003, 23(9): 1605-1608.
徐世晓, 赵新全, 孙平, 等. 青藏高原5种牧草木质素含量及其体外消化率研究. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(9): 1605-1608.
[33] Liu G, Zhao G Q, Wei L M.Primary application of the entropy weight-based gray systematic theory to integrated evaluation of oat. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(3): 84-89.
刘刚, 赵桂琴, 魏黎明. 基于熵权赋权法的灰色系统理论在燕麦品种综合评价中的应用. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(3): 84-89.
[34] Liu R X, Zhang G W, Yang C Q.Using gray related degree method based on entropy weight theory to evaluate salt tolerance of cotton. Acta Agriculture Nucleate Sinica, 2017, 31(2): 402-409.
刘瑞显, 张国伟, 杨长琴. 基于熵权理论的灰色关联度法在棉花耐盐性评价中的应用. 核农学报, 2017, 31(2): 402-409.

西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究

A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the Valley region of Tibet, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张蓉, 陈光吉, 尚以顺, 李世歌, 李小冬, 熊先勤, 牟琼, 王小利, 冉伟男, 班宋智. 鲜饲金荞麦对热应激蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质和血清指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 179-189.
[2]	王苗苗, 周向睿, 梁国玲, 赵桂琴, 焦润安, 柴继宽, 高雪梅, 李娟宁. 5份燕麦材料苗期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 143-154.
[3]	马千虎, 张学梅, 王自奎, 杨惠敏. 基于APSIM模型的高寒地区燕麦灌溉制度优化[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 1-10.
[4]	雷雄, 游明鸿, 白史且, 陈丽丽, 邓培华, 熊毅, 熊艳丽, 余青青, 马啸, 杨建, 张昌兵. 川西北高原50份燕麦种质农艺性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 131-142.
[5]	孙大明, 殷雨洋, 吴建良, 刘理想, 毛胜勇, 刘军花. 早期补饲粉状精料和颗粒料对羔羊生长性能及胃肠道发育的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 184-192.
[6]	何国兴, 宋建超, 温雅洁, 刘彩婷, 祁娟. 不同根瘤菌肥对紫花苜蓿生产力及土壤肥力的综合影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 109-120.
[7]	聂秀美, 赵桂琴, 孙浩洋, 柴继宽, 兰晓君, 周恒, 黎蓉, 琚泽亮, 焦润安, 孙雷雷. 甘肃省燕麦主产区叶斑病调查及病原鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 157-167.
[8]	游永亮, 李源, 赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 刘贵波. 海河平原区施氮磷肥对饲用小黑麦生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 137-146.
[9]	赵娟娟, 张伟涛, 郭伟婷, 孙新胜, 王超, 赵寿培, 车大璐, 高玉红. 饮水温度对冬季育肥羊生产性能、血液理化指标及瘤胃显微结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 57-66.
[10]	何海锋, 闫承宏, 吴娜, 刘吉利, 常雯雯. 施氮量对柳枝稷叶片叶绿素荧光特性及干物质积累的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 141-150.
[11]	许留兴, 唐国建, 胡亚琴, 张建国. 饲用小麦生产与利用研究现状及发展前景[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 192-199.
[12]	刘建新, 欧晓彬, 王金成, 刘瑞瑞, 贾海燕. 镉胁迫下裸燕麦幼苗对外源H₂O₂的生理响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 125-134.
[13]	苗晓茸, 孙艳梅, 于磊, 马春晖, 张前兵. 氮磷互作对不同茬次滴灌苜蓿生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 55-66.
[14]	琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 贾志峰, 梁国玲. 不同燕麦品种在甘肃中部的营养价值及青贮发酵品质综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 77-86.
[15]	张霞, 李妙善, 周恩光, 王虎成. 西北地区4种优质饲草的肉牛体外瘤胃发酵性能研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 135-145.