青海省森林林下草本层化学计量特征及其碳储量

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018371

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 26-37.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018371

青海省森林林下草本层化学计量特征及其碳储量

程瑞希¹, 字洪标², 罗雪萍², 杨有芳², 代迪¹, 王艳丽¹, 所尔阿芝¹, 王长庭^{2, *}

1.西南民族大学生命科学与技术学院,四川成都610041;
2.西南民族大学青藏高原研究院,四川成都610041

收稿日期:2018-06-05 修回日期:2018-08-27 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-20
通讯作者: wangct6@163.com/wangct@swun.edu.cn
作者简介:程瑞希(1995-),女,四川成都人,在读硕士。E-mail: 15198047780@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然基金项目(31870407、31370542),中国科学院战略性先导科技专项“应对气候变化的碳收支认证及相关问题”(XDA05050207),中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2018NZD13),四川省教育厅创新团队项目(14TD0049)和西南民族大学研究生“创新型科研项目”重点项目(CX2018XZ65)资助

The elemental C∶N∶P stoichiometric characteristics and carbon storage of the herb layer under forest in Qinghai Province

CHENG Rui-xi¹, ZI Hong-biao², LUO Xue-ping², YANG You-fang², DAI Di¹, WANG Yan-li¹, SUOER Azhi¹, WANG Chang-ting^{2, *}

1.College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, China;
2.College of Tibetan Plateau Research, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2018-06-05 Revised:2018-08-27 Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为阐明青海省森林生态系统林下草本层化学计量特征和碳密度分布格局,基于2011年青海森林资源野外样方调查和室内分析,评估了青海省7个优势种(白桦、白杨、红桦、青杄、山杨、圆柏、云杉)林下草本层的化学计量特征(C、N、P;C∶N、C∶P、N∶P)以及碳密度的差异。同时,估算了青海省7个优势种林下草本层碳储量大小。结果表明,草本层地上碳含量圆柏林[(419.9±1.44) g·kg^-1]显著高于其他林型,但是地下碳含量[(364.6±8.33) g·kg^-1]显著低于其他林型;氮含量均表现出圆柏和云杉林显著高于其他林型;磷含量在不同林型间差异不显著。圆柏林和云杉林林下草本层C∶N、C∶P显著低于其他林型,而N∶P显著高于其他林型。此外,林下草本层地上和地下生物量、碳密度均表现出圆柏林显著高于其他林型。根据青海省7种优势树种化学计量特征与碳密度的相关性分析,发现草本层碳密度与其化学计量特征有相关性,可以根据碳含量推算碳密度。将海拔作为环境因子考虑,发现圆柏和云杉林下草本层碳密度分布于较高海拔,其他树种则分布于较低海拔。因此,理解养分元素在草本层“地上-地下部分”之间的生态化学计量特征,以及估算草本层的碳储量,对于揭示青海省森林生态系统的养分状况和生物化学循环过程极为重要。

关键词: 草本层, 优势种, 化学计量特征, 生物量, 碳密度, 碳储量

Abstract: The aim of this study was to clarify the elemental C∶N∶P stoichiometric ratios and carbon density distribution patterns of the herb layer under forest in ecosystems in China’s Qinghai Province. Forest surveys and laboratory analyses of samples collected were carried out in 2011. Determinations included elemental concentrations of C, N, and P, together with their stoichometric ratios, C∶N, C∶P, and N∶P, and C reserves (g·kg^-1) of the herb layers under seven dominant species (Betula platyphylla, Populus tomentosa, Betula albo-sinensis, Picea wilsonii, Populus davidiana, Sabina chinensis, Picea asperata). The results show: the aboveground carbon content [(419.9±1.44) g·kg^-1] of S. chinensis forest was significantly higher than that of other forest types, but the underground carbon content [(364.6±8.33) g·kg^-1] was significantly lower than that of other forest types; the nitrogen content of S. chinensis and P. asperata forests was significantly higher than that of other forest types. There was no significant difference in phosphorus content between different forest types. The C∶N and C∶P stoichiometric ratios of S. chinensis and P. asperata forests were significantly lower than other forest types, while the N∶P ratio was significantly higher than other forest types. In addition, the biomass and carbon density of S. chinensis forest underground herb layer, both aboveground and belowground were significantly higher than that of other forest types. Correlation analysis of the stoichiometric data for these seven dominant tree species in Qinghai Province showed that the carbon density of the herb layer was correlated with its stoichiometric characteristics, and the carbon density could be estimated based on the carbon content. Taking altitude as an environmental factor, it was found that the carbon density of the herb layer under S. chinensis and P. asperata forest was distributed at higher altitude, while other species were distributed at lower altitude. Therefore, understanding the ecological stoichiometric characteristics of nutrient elements for the above and below ground parts of the herb layer, as well as estimating the carbon reserves of the herb layer, is very important to understanding the nutrient status and biochemical cycling processes of forest ecosystems in Qinghai Province.

Key words: herb layer, dominant species, stoichiometric character, the biomass, the density of carbon, carbon reserve

程瑞希, 字洪标, 罗雪萍, 杨有芳, 代迪, 王艳丽, 所尔阿芝, 王长庭. 青海省森林林下草本层化学计量特征及其碳储量[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(7): 26-37.

CHENG Rui-xi, ZI Hong-biao, LUO Xue-ping, YANG You-fang, DAI Di, WANG Yan-li, SUOER Azhi, WANG Chang-ting. The elemental C∶N∶P stoichiometric characteristics and carbon storage of the herb layer under forest in Qinghai Province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(7): 26-37.

参考文献

[1] Ciais P, Tans P P, Trolier M, et al. A large northern hemisphere terrestrial CO₂ sink indicated by the ¹³C/¹²C ratio of atmospheric CO₂. Science, 1995, 269(5227): 1098-1102.
[2] He J S, Han X G.Ecological stoichiometry: Searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1): 2-6.
贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学: 探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 2-6.
[3] Zeng F P, Chi G Y, Chen X, et al. The stoichiometric characteristics of C, N and P in soil and root of larch (Larix spp.) plantation at different stand ages in mountainous region of eastern Liaoning Province, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(7): 1819-1825.
曾凡鹏, 迟光宇, 陈欣, 等. 辽东山区不同林龄落叶松人工林土壤-根系C: N: P生态化学计量特征. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(7): 1819-1825.
[4] Pan F J, Zhang W, Wang K L, et al. Litter C∶N∶P ecological stoichiometry character of plant communities in typical Karst Peak-Cluster Depression. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(2): 335-343.
潘复静, 张伟, 王克林, 等. 典型喀斯特峰丛洼地植被群落凋落物C∶N∶P生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2011, 31(2): 335-343.
[5] Zhang K, He M Z, Li X R, et al. Foliar carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of typical desert plants across the Alashan Desert. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(22): 6538-6547.
张珂, 何明珠, 李新荣, 等. 阿拉善荒漠典型植物叶片碳、氮、磷化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2014, 34(22): 6538-6547.
[6] Yang S Q, Zhao X J, Sen D, et al. Leaf C, N and P chemometrics and their altitudinal variations in the central Tianshan Mountains. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(6): 1371-1379.
杨思琪, 赵旭剑, 森道, 等. 天山中段植物叶片碳氮磷化学计量及其海拔变化特征. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(6): 1371-1379.
[7] Zhao W J, Liu X D, Jin M, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in leaf-litter-soil system of picea crassifolia forest in the Qilian Mountains. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(2): 477-489.
赵维俊, 刘贤德, 金铭, 等.祁连山青海云杉林叶片—枯落物—土壤的碳氮磷生态化学计量特征. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(2):477-489.
[8] Li D F, Yu S L, Wang G X, et al. Environmental heterogeneity and mechanism of stoichiometry properties of vegetative organs in dominant shrub communities across the Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(5): 453-465.
李单凤, 于顺利, 王国勋, 等. 黄土高原优势灌丛营养器官化学计量特征的环境分异和机制. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(5): 453-465.
[9] Ma R T, Fang Y, An S S.Ecological stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and C∶N∶P in shoots and litter of plants in grassland in Yunwu Mountain. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(5): 1170-1180.
马任甜, 方瑛, 安韶山. 云雾山草地植物地上部分和枯落物的碳、氮、磷生态化学计量特征. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(5): 1170-1180.
[10] Bi J H, Su B L, Yu D P, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of different forest types in mountainous region of eastern Liaoning Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(11): 3109-3115.
毕建华, 苏宝玲, 于大炮, 等. 辽东山区不同森林类型生态化学计量特征. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(11): 3109-3115.
[11] Liu G H, Fu B J, Fang J Y.Carbon dynamics of Chinese forests and its contribution to global carbon balance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, (5): 733-740.
刘国华, 傅伯杰, 方精云. 中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献. 生态学报, 2000, (5): 733-740.
[12] Zhang Y, Zhou X, Zhao Q F, et al. Value accounting of forest carbon sinks in China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(6): 124-131.
张颖, 周雪, 覃庆锋, 等. 中国森林碳汇价值核算研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(6): 124-131.
[13] Shi X L, Chen K, Lu C X.Value evaluation of forest carbon sinks services in China. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 9(5): 27-33.
石小亮, 陈珂, 鲁晨曦. 中国森林碳汇服务价值评价. 中南林业科技大学学报 (社会科学版), 2015, 9(5): 27-33.
[14] Lu H, Liu K, Wu J H.Change of carbon storage in forest vegetation and current situation analysis of Qinghai Province in recent 20 years. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2013, 22(10): 1333-1338.
卢航, 刘康, 吴金鸿. 青海省近20年森林植被碳储量变化及其现状分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(10): 1333-1338.
[15] Hu L, Wang C T, Wang G X, et al. Carbon sequestration of forest ecosystem vegetation in Qinghai Province. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(2): 826-832.
胡雷, 王长庭, 王根绪, 等. 青海省森林生态系统植被固碳现状研究. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(2): 826-832.
[16] Peng S Z, Zhao C Y, Zheng X L, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of the biomass and carbon storage of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) forests in Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(7): 1689-1694.
彭守璋, 赵传燕, 郑祥霖, 等. 祁连山青海云杉林生物量和碳储量空间分布特征. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(7): 1689-1694.
[17] Wang X K, Feng Z W, Ouyang Z Y.Vegetation carbon storage and density of forest ecosystems in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(1): 13-16.
王效科, 冯宗炜, 欧阳志云. 中国森林生态系统的植物碳储量和碳密度研究. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(1): 13-16.
[18] Dong X.Evaluation of forest resources in qinghai Province. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(12): 5727-5728, 5751.
董旭. 青海省森林资源评价. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(12): 5727-5728, 5751.
[19] Technical Specifications for Carbon Sequestration Projects in the Ecosystem. Observation and investigation for carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
生态系统固碳项目技术规范编写组. 生态系统固碳观测与调查技术规范. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
[20] Shi H L, Wang Q J, Jing Z C, et al. The structure, biodiversity and stability of artificial grassland plant communities in the source regions of the Yangze and Yellow River. Acta Pratacultural Science, 2005, (3): 23-30.
史惠兰, 王启基, 景增春, 等. 江河源区人工草地群落特征、多样性及其稳定性分析. 草业学报, 2005, (3): 23-30.
[21] Cui G Y, Cao Y, Chen Y M, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across components of forest eco-system in Shaanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(12): 1146-1155.
崔高阳, 曹扬, 陈云明, 等. 陕西省森林各生态系统组分氮磷化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(12): 1146-1155.
[22] Dawson T P, Curran P J.A new technique for interpolating the reflectance red edge position. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998, 19: 2133-2139.
[23] Zhang W Y, Fan J W, Zhong H P, et al. The nitrogen∶phosphorus stoichiometry of different plant functional groups for dominant species of typical steppes in China. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(4): 503-509.
张文彦, 樊江文, 钟华平, 等. 中国典型草原优势植物功能群氮磷化学计量学特征研究. 草地学报, 2010, 18(4): 503-509.
[24] Wang J Y, Wang S Q, Li R L, et al. C∶N∶P stoichiometric characteristics of four forest types’dominant tree species in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(6): 587-595.
王晶苑, 王绍强, 李纫兰, 等.中国四种森林类型主要优势植物的C∶N∶P化学计量学特征. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 587-595.
[25] Wardle D A, Walker L R, Bardgett R D.Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chrono sequences. Science, 2004, 305: 509-513.
[26] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F.The vegetation N∶P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33: 1441-1450.
[27] Aerts R, Chapin F S III. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 2000, 30(8): 1-67.
[28] Ma W H, Fang J Y.R∶S ratios of temperate steppe and the environmental controls in Inner Mongolia. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 42(6): 774-778.
马文红, 方精云. 内蒙古温带草原的根冠比及其影响因素. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42(6): 774-778.
[29] Ni J.Estimating net primary productivity of grasslands from field biomass measurements in temperate northern China. Plant Ecology, 2004, 174(2): 217-234.
[30] Xia Y, Moore D I, Collins S L, et al. Aboveground production and species richness of annuals in Chihuahuan Desert grassland and shrubland plant communities. Journal of Arid Environments, 2010, 74(3): 378-385.
[31] Wang M, Su Y Z, Yang R, et al. Allocation patterns of above-and belowground biomass in desert grassland in the middle reaches of Heihe River, Gansu Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(3): 209-219.
王敏, 苏永中, 杨荣, 等. 黑河中游荒漠草地地上和地下生物量的分配格局. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(3): 209-219.
[32] Huang G L, Liu J, Hou M, et al. Value assessment on service function of forest soil in Qinghai Province. Forest Resources Management, 2015, (4): 7-12.
黄桂林, 刘晶, 侯盟, 等. 青海省森林土壤生态服务价值评估研究. 林业资源管理, 2015, (4): 7-12.
[33] Zhang H, Song T Q, Wang K L, et al. Oak biomass and its allocation at different stand ages in west of Guangxi, China. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2013, 34(6): 758-762.
张浩, 宋同清, 王克林, 等. 桂西地区不同林龄栎类群落的生物量及其分配格局. 农业现代化研究, 2013, 34(6): 758-762.
[34] Hu F, Du H, Zeng F P, et al. Carbon storage and its allocation in karst forest at different stand ages in Guangxi, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(3): 721-729.
胡芳, 杜虎, 曾馥平, 等. 广西不同林龄喀斯特森林生态系统碳储量及其分配格局. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 721-729.
[35] Zhong C L, Huang Y X, Zhang Q, et al. The stoichiometric characteristics and carbon, nitrogen stores of four main coastal shelterbelt forests in Pingtan. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(2): 96-102.
钟春柳, 黄义雄, 张巧, 等. 平潭4种主要防护林碳氮磷化学计量特征与碳氮储量研究. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(2): 96-102.
[36] Hessen D O, Agren G I, Anderson T R, et al. Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: The role of stoichiometry.Ecology, 2004, 85(5): 1179-1192.
[37] Sterner R W, Elser J J.Ecological stoichiometry: The biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere.Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2002.
[38] Zeng L X, Lei L, Wang X R, et al. Effect of altitudinal variation on carbon density in arbor layer and soil layer of Picea crassifolia forest in Qilian Mountains. 2018, (20): 1-9.
曾立雄, 雷蕾, 王晓荣, 等. 海拔梯度对祁连山青海云杉林乔木层和土壤层碳密度的影响. 生态学报, 2018, (20): 1-9.
[39] Hou L, Ren Y H, Zhang S X, et al. Carbon storage of shrub and herb iayers under Quercus variabilis forests in the Qinling Mountains. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design, 2015, 38(5): 124-127.
侯磊, 任毅华, 张硕新, 等. 秦岭栓皮栎林下灌草碳储量研究. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2015, 38(5): 124-127.

青海省森林林下草本层化学计量特征及其碳储量

The elemental C∶N∶P stoichiometric characteristics and carbon storage of the herb layer under forest in Qinghai Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李静, 红梅, 闫瑾, 张宇晨, 梁志伟, 叶贺, 高海燕, 赵巴音那木拉. 短花针茅荒漠草原植被群落结构及生物量对水氮变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 38-48.
[2]	鲍根生, 宋梅玲, 王玉琴, 尹亚丽, 王宏生. 围封和防除狼毒对狼毒斑块土壤理化性质和微生物量影响的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 63-72.
[3]	孙小富, 黄莉娟, 王普昶, 赵丽丽, 刘芳. 不同供磷水平对宽叶雀稗形态及生理的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 58-69.
[4]	郭强, 王玉琴, 鲍根生, 王宏生. 气象因子对高原鼢鼠种群数量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 188-194.
[5]	马千虎, 张学梅, 王自奎, 杨惠敏. 基于APSIM模型的高寒地区燕麦灌溉制度优化[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 1-10.
[6]	杨子翰, 陈泰祥, 郑巧燕, 卫万荣. 高原鼢鼠干扰对高寒草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 13-20.
[7]	徐田伟, 赵炯昌, 毛绍娟, 耿远月, 刘宏金, 赵新全, 徐世晓. 青海省海北地区高寒草甸群落特征和生物量对短期休牧的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 1-8.
[8]	张金羽, 周忠泽, 叶晓馨. 陌上菅对三种禾本科植物的化感潜势研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 103-111.
[9]	聂莹莹, 徐丽君, 辛晓平, 陈宝瑞, 张保辉. 围栏封育对温性草甸草原植物群落构成及生态位特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 11-22.
[10]	李子雁, 刘尊驰, 鄢创, 张静静, 时新荣, 袁志友. 内蒙古草原不同土壤pH条件下植物生物量和多样性的关系:样带调查和控制实验的比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 38-49.
[11]	施颖, 胡廷花, 高红娟, 罗巧玉, 于应文. 两种放牧模式下高寒草甸群落植被构成及稳定性特征[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 1-10.
[12]	官惠玲, 樊江文, 李愈哲. 不同人工草地对青藏高原温性草原群落生物量组成及物种多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 192-201.
[13]	王鑫, 罗雪萍, 字洪标, 杨文高, 胡雷, 王长庭. 青海森林凋落物生态化学计量特征及其影响因子[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 1-14.
[14]	王丽娜, 罗久富, 杨梅香, 张利, 刘学敏, 邓东周, 周金星. 氮添加对退化高寒草地土壤微生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(7): 38-48.
[15]	李琳, 赵威. 豫西北地区暖性灌草丛类草地生态系统固碳特征[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 26-35.