基于APSIM模型的高寒地区燕麦灌溉制度优化

doi:10.11686/cyxb2019455

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出青海海西地区燕麦生产优化灌溉制度,为当地燕麦优质高效生产提供技术参考。大田试验于2017-2018年在青海省乌兰县金泰牧场开展,2017年无灌溉处理,2018年设置4个灌溉处理,分别为仅开花期灌溉(I₁),在分蘖期和拔节期灌溉(I₂),在分蘖期、拔节期和开花期灌溉(I₃),无灌溉(N_I),灌溉处理每次的灌溉量均为50 mm。采用2018年I₃处理的数据校准APSIM模型,用2018年其他灌溉处理和2017年的数据验证模型,然后模拟不同降水年型下不同灌溉情景的产量和水分利用,并提出青海海西地区燕麦草地优化灌溉制度。试验结果表明,2018年处理I₃的产量和耗水量最高,且与其他处理差异显著,处理I₂的水分利用效率最高。2017年无灌溉处理的干物质高于2018年的处理I₂、I₁和N_I,并且水分利用效率比2018年的4个处理均高。模型校准过程中干物质产量和土壤水分的模拟值与实测值的均方根误差(RMSE)分别为0.94 t·hm^-2和4.96 mm,4个关键物候期(出苗期、开花期、灌浆期和收获期)的模拟值与实测值的RMSE分别为1、3、4和8 d。验证过程中2018年I₁、I₂和N_I干物质产量和土壤储水量模拟值与实测值的RMSE分别为1.03 t·hm^-2和7.13 mm;2017年4个关键物候期的模拟值与实测值的RMSE为1、1、5和10 d。表明调参之后的“APSIM-燕麦”模拟水分和产量的可靠性较高。利用校准后的模型模拟了10种灌溉情景下燕麦的干物质产量、水分利用效率和灌溉水生产效率,结果表明,在2017(降水低于年平均降水量)和2018年(降水高于年平均降水量),情景8(在分蘖期和拔节期灌溉,每次的灌溉量为50 mm)均为最优灌溉方案。研究结果对于研究区的燕麦人工草地的节水灌溉管理具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: APSIM, 燕麦, 土壤水分, 生物量, 灌溉制度, 高寒地区

Abstract: This research investigated optimization of irrigation schedules for oat production in an alpine region located in Haixi Prefecture of Qinghai Province, to provide technical guidance for oat production in the region. A field experiment was carried out at Jintai Farm in Wulan County, Qinghai Province, in 2017 and 2018. No irrigation was applied in 2017. Four irrigation treatments were set up in 2018: one irrigation at flowering stage (I₁), two irrigations at tillering stage and jointing stage (I₂), three irrigations at tillering stage, jointing stage and flowering stage (I₃), and no irrigation (N_I). Water applied at each irrigation was 50 mm. The APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulation) model was calibrated with the data in I₃ in 2018, and validated with the data from the other irrigation treatments in 2018 and from unirrigated plantings in 2017. The yield and water use under different irrigation scenarios in different years were then simulated, and the optimal irrigation schedule for oat cropping in the study region was modelled. It was found that the highest yield and water consumption (significantly different from other treatments) occurred in I₃ in 2018, while, the water use efficiency was highest in I₂. Dry matter yield in 2017 was higher, and water use efficiency greater than in the treatments I₂, I₁ and N_I in 2018. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the simulated and measured values of dry matter yield and soil moisture were 0.94 t·hm^-2 and 4.96 mm respectively in model calibration, and were 1, 3, 4 and 8 d in the four key phenological periods (sowing-emergence, sowing-flowering, sowing-filling and sowing-harvesting). The RMSE of the simulated and measured values of dry matter yield and soil moisture were 1.03 t·hm^-2 and 7.13 mm respectively in model validation, and were 1, 1, 5 and 10 d in the four key phenological periods in 2017. The results showed that APSIM-oat, after calibration, was reliable in simulating soil water content and yield. The calibrated model was used to simulate the dry matter yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water production efficiency of oats under 10 irrigation scenarios. The results showed that a scenario involving irrigation at tillering and jointing, with 50 mm water applied at each irrigation, was the optimal irrigation regime in 2017. (In 2017, annual rainfall was below average, while in 2018 annual rainfall was above average. The results have reference value for water-saving irrigation management of forage oat plantings in the study area.

Key words: APSIM, oats, soil water, biomass, irrigation system, alpine region

马千虎, 张学梅, 王自奎, 杨惠敏. 基于APSIM模型的高寒地区燕麦灌溉制度优化[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 1-10.

MA Qian-hu, ZHANG Xue-mei, WANG Zi-kui, YANG Hui-min. Optimizing oat irrigation schedules in an alpine region using APSIM[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 1-10.

参考文献

[1] Xu C L. The study on production potential of nutritive agriculture of oat artificial grassland in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Grassland of China, 2005, (6): 66-68.
徐长林. 青藏高原燕麦人工草地营养体农业生产潜力的探讨. 中国草地, 2005, (6): 66-68.
[2] Sheng M H, Zhu Y K, Zhao X, et al. Analysis of current grassland resources in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(2): 139-154.
沈海花, 朱言坤, 赵霞, 等. 中国草地资源的现状分析. 科学通报, 2016, 61(2): 139-154.
[3] Luo C Y, Zhao L, Zhao X Q, et al. Screening of seeding ration of common vetch and oat mixture in Qinghai Lake area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 95-99.
罗彩云, 赵亮, 赵新全, 等. 青海湖地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆最佳混播比例的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 95-99.
[4] Bao G S, Zhou Q P, Han Z L, et al. Effect of applying fertilizers on yield and quality of oats in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010, 32(2): 108-112.
鲍根生, 周青平, 韩志林, 等. 施肥对青藏高原燕麦产量和品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(2): 108-112.
[5] De K J, Wang D L, Zhou Q P, et al. Effects of fertilization on seed production in oat (Avena sativa) on the Tibetan Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(1): 26-30.
德科加, 王德利, 周青平, 等. 施肥对青藏高原燕麦种子生产的增产效应. 草业科学, 2008, 25(1): 26-30.
[6] Çarpici E B. Determination of forage yield and quality of mixtures of hairy vetch with some cereals (oat, barley and wheat) grown as catch crop. Legume Research, 2017, 40(6): 1088-1092.
[7] Zhang X M, Ma Q H, Zhang Z L, et al. Effects of fertilization rate on forage yield and water use efficiency of artificial grassland in an alpine arid area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(8): 1368-1379.
张学梅, 马千虎, 张子龙, 等. 施肥对高寒荒漠草原区混播人工草地产量和水分利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(8): 1368-1379.
[8] Liang G L, Qin Y, Wei X X, et al. Evaluation on productivity and quality of oat strain I-D in the alpine regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(4): 917-927.
梁国玲, 秦燕, 魏小星, 等. 青藏高原高寒区I-D燕麦品系饲草生产性能及品质评价. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 917-927.
[9] Wang N, Wang J, Feng L P, et al. Modeling the impact of “double-delay” technology on yield of wheat-maize cropping system in the north China Plain. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2015, 36(5): 611-618.
王娜, 王靖, 冯利平, 等. 华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米轮作区采用“两晚”技术的产量效应模拟分析. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36(5): 611-618.
[10] Zhang C J, Xu Z H, Yu R A. Optimal allocation of regional agricultural water resources based on large system level transfer model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, (12): 1480-1485.
张长江, 徐征和, 贠汝安. 应用大系统递阶模型优化配置区域农业水资源. 水利学报, 2005, (12): 1480-1485.
[11] Wang W J, Feng H. The progress and problems in the development of foreign crop model. Water Saving Irrigation, 2012, (8): 63-68.
王文佳, 冯浩. 国外主要作物模型研究进展与存在问题. 节水灌溉, 2012, (8): 63-68.
[12] Zhao S C. Study on water requirement regulation and irrigation management decision of artificial grass in Tibet Alpine Pastoral areas. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2013.
赵世昌. 西藏高寒牧区人工牧草需水规律及灌溉管理决策研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2013.
[13] Li Y, Xue C Y, Yang X G, et al. Reduction of yield risk of winter wheat by appropriate irrigation based on APSIM model. Transactions of the Chines Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(10): 35-44.
李艳, 薛昌颖, 杨晓光, 等. 基于APSIM模型的灌溉降低冬小麦产量风险研究. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(10): 35-44.
[14] Jiang Y, Zhang L, Zhang B, et al. Modeling irrigation management for water conservation by DSSAT-maize model in arid northwestern China. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 177: 37-45.
[15] Pawar G S, Kale M U, Lokhande J N. Response of AquaCrop model to different irrigation schedules for irrigated cabbage. Agricultural Research, 2017, 6(1): 73-81.
[16] Zhao L J, Xue L H, Sun Q K, et al. Effect of different irrigation and nitrogen application on water consumption characteristics and the water and nitrogen use efficiencies under drip irrigation in winter wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(8): 1050-1059.
赵连佳, 薛丽华, 孙乾坤, 等. 不同水氮处理对滴灌冬小麦田耗水特性及水氮利用效率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(8): 1050-1059.
[17] Li S, Li F, Liu X. Effects of early soil water distribution on the dry matter partition between roots and shoots of winter wheat. Agricultural Water Management, 2001, 49(3): 163-171.
[18] Chu G H, Yang L X. Study on effect of deficit irrigation on the yield and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Water Saving Irrigation, 2016, (8): 54-56.
褚桂红, 杨丽霞. 非充分灌溉对冬小麦产量及水分利用效率影响研究. 节水灌溉, 2016, (8): 54-56.
[19] Kang X L, Jing H, Ma A P, et al. Effects of micro sprinkler irrigation amounts on soil water storage and consumption and water use efficiency in the north of Huang-Huai-Hai wheat field. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(1): 221-226.
亢秀丽, 靖华, 马爱平, 等. 黄淮海北片麦田微喷灌水量对土壤贮水耗水及水分利用效率的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(1): 221-226.
[20] Zhang Q B, Liu M, Wang H. Advances in research on crop groundwater utilization based on simulated irrigation system simulation. Zhihuai, 2018, (6): 14-15.
章启兵, 刘猛, 王辉. 基于优化灌溉制度模拟的作物对地下水利用研究进展. 治淮, 2018, (6): 14-15.
[21] Abraha M G, Savage M J. The soil water balance of rainfed and irrigated oats, Italian rye grass and rye using the CropSyst model. Irrigation Science, 2008, 26(3): 203-212.
[22] Zhang Y, Zhang L, Yang N, et al. Optimized sowing time windows mitigate climate risks for oats production under cool semi-arid growing conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 266/267: 184-197.
[23] Zhao H, Li F M, Xiong Y C, et al. Advance about impact of soil drying on growth and yield of crops. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2008, (3): 67-71.
赵鸿, 李凤民, 熊友才, 等. 土壤干旱对作物生长过程和产量影响的研究进展. 干旱气象, 2008, (3): 67-71.
[24] Xu B, Tang P C, Li Q, et al. Research on optimal irrigation schedule of oats by CROPWAT in Lhasa of Tibet. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(6): 35-39.
徐冰, 汤鹏程, 李奇, 等. 基于CROPWAT模型的拉萨地区燕麦优化灌溉制度研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(6): 35-39.
[25] Wang F Q, Xiang J, Guo B G, et al. Effects of mixed sowing ratio, nitrogen application and irrigation on biomass of legume-grass forage in Lhasa Valley. Guangzhou: Papers Collection of the Annual Meeting of the Chinese Grass Society in 2017, 2017.
王富强, 向洁, 郭宝光, 等. 拉萨河谷区豆禾牧草混播比例、施氮、灌溉对生物量的影响. 广州: 2017中国草学会年会论文集, 2017.
[26] Xu B, Tian D L, Guo K Z, et al. A preliminary study on water consumption and irrigation schedule of oat in Tibet. Water Saving Irrigation, 2013, (3): 57-59.
徐冰, 田德龙, 郭克贞, 等. 西藏高寒牧区燕麦耗水量与灌溉制度初步研究. 节水灌溉, 2013, (3): 57-59.