喀斯特山区不同草地土壤结构及分形特征

doi:10.11686/cyxb2019522

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以喀斯特区域不同草地生态恢复阶段为研究对象,采用时空互代法对喀斯特山区耕地、退耕还草地、草地、林草间作地的土壤颗粒、团聚体、微团聚体粒径分布及分形维数进行研究,并分析分形维数与土壤理化性质的相互关系。结果表明,在石漠化恢复过程中,粗粒径微团聚体、团聚体含量随生态的不断恢复而增加,细粒径含量降低,但土壤机械组成与之相反。0~10 cm土层土壤微团聚体平均重量直径(MWD)表现为林草间作地、草地>耕地>退耕还草地,退耕还草地显著低于其他草地类型,分别比林草间作地、草地、耕地低0.15、0.15和0.11 mm;团聚状况在10~20 cm下均表现为草地>林草间作地>耕地>退耕还草地,其中退耕还草地显著低于林草间作地和草地,分别低8.26%和13.18%;土壤结构特征表明退耕还草地结构最弱。生态恢复过程中,土壤微团聚体和团聚体的分形维数从大到小依次为退耕还草地>耕地>林草间作地>草地,土壤颗粒分形维数从大到小依次为草地>林草间作地>耕地>退耕还草地,表明喀斯特山区土壤结构随生态恢复而逐渐变好,土壤分形维数一定程度上能反映喀斯特石漠化区域生态恢复的过程与特征。同时喀斯特地区土壤分形维数与其理化性质存在较好的相关性,微团聚体及团聚体分形维数能够较好的表征土壤结构及抗蚀能力的强弱。在石漠化区域生态恢复与石漠化治理过程中,通过人工调控措施,缩短退耕还草阶段,加快草地等植被覆盖度的增加,能有效减少水土流失,改善该区生态环境。

关键词: 喀斯特山区, 石漠化区, 草地, 生态恢复, 土壤结构

Abstract: This research studied soil properties in different stages of grassland ecological restoration in a karst area. Specifically, the size distribution of soil particles, and the fractal dimension of soil aggregates and micro-aggregates were evaluated for farm cropland (FC), land in conversion from cropland to grassland (CCG), grassland (G), and forest and grass intercropped land (FGI), in a karst mountainous. These four spatially separated land categories were considered to represent a land restoration time series. Results were obtained from a combination of field sampling and laboratory analysis, and the relationship between fractal dimension of soil aggregates and soil physical and chemical properties was also analyzed. It was found that during the process of ‘rocky desertification restoration', the proportion of larger-diameter micro-aggregates and aggregates increased across the ecological restoration time series, while the proportion of smaller-diameter soil peds decreased. However, the mechanical composition of soil showed an opposite trend. The mean weight diameter (MWD) ranking of soil micro-aggregates in 0-10 cm soil layer was: FGI=G>FC>CCG. Quantitatively, the MWD of soil micro-aggregates in CCG was 0.15, 0.15 and 0.11 lower than other grassland types, which was 0.15, 0.15 and 0.11 lower (P<0.05), respectively, than that of FGI, G, and FC land. Soil micro-aggregate MWD in 10-20 cm soil layer ranked G>FGI>FC>CCG, and values for CCG were 8.26% and 13.18% lower (P<0.05), respectively, than those for FGI and G. The soil structure characteristics were weakest in CGC land. Across the ecological restoration time series, the fractal dimensions of soil micro-aggregates and aggregates ranked in descending order: CCG>FC>FGI>G, while the fractal dimensions of soil particles ranked in descending order: G>FGI>FC>CCG. These results indicate that soil structure in this karst mountain area is gradually improved with ecological restoration, and the soil fractal dimensions reflect soil restoration status in the karst rocky desertification area to some extent. At the same time, the fractal dimension of these soils correlates well with their physical and chemical properties. The fractal dimension of micro-aggregates and aggregates can better represent the strength of soil structure and erosion-resistance. In the process of ecological restoration and control of rocky desertification, human input that shortens the time needed to return farmland to grassland or accelerates increase of vegetation coverage, can effectively reduce soil erosion and improve the ecological environment of the region.

Key words: karst mountain area, rocky desertification area, grassland, ecological restoration, soil structure

罗楠, 舒英格, 陈梦军, 肖盛杨. 喀斯特山区不同草地土壤结构及分形特征[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 11-22.

LUO Nan, SHU Ying-ge, CHEN Meng-jun, XIAO Sheng-yang. Soil structure and fractal characteristics of different land categories in a karst rocky desertification area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 11-22.

参考文献

[1] Dai W C, Gao M, Wang Z F, et al. Composition and fractal characteristics of soil aggregates in different soil use patterns in purple hilly area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(6): 259-264.
代文才, 高明, 王子芳, 等. 紫色丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤剖面微团聚体组成及分形特征. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6): 259-264.
[2] Tom G, Thomas R, Kai U. Formation of mineral-mineral and organo-mineral composite building units from microaggregate-forming materials including microbially produced extracellular polymeric substances. European Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 70(3): 604-615.
[3] An S S, Huang Y M, Zheng F L. Effects of land use patterns of different plant communities on soil quality in loess area of Ningxia. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2008, 14(2): 300-307.
安韶山, 黄懿梅, 郑粉莉. 宁夏黄土区不同植物群落土地利用方式对土壤质量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(2): 300-307.
[4] Pu Y L, Xie D T, Lin C W, et al. Composition and fractal characteristics of soil microaggregates in hedgerow-crop farmland. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(6): 1069-1077.
蒲玉琳, 谢德体, 林超文, 等. 植物篱-农作坡耕地土壤微团聚体组成及分形特征. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(6): 1069-1077.
[5] Su Y Z, Zhao H L, Zhao W Z, et al. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating deser-tification. Geoderma, 2004, 122(1): 43-49.
[6] Wen X Q, Shu Y G, He H. Soil nutrients and microbial characteristics of different land use patterns in karst mountainous areas. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(6): 1227-1233.
文小琴, 舒英格, 何欢. 喀斯特山区土地不同利用方式的土壤养分及微生物特征. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(6): 1227-1233.
[7] Wang D L, Shu Y G, Wen X Q, et al. Distribution characteristics of silica, aluminum and aluminum in lime soil profile in karst mountainous area——A case study of Qinglong County, Guizhou Province. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(5): 777-785.
王大龙, 舒英格, 文小琴, 等. 岩溶山区石灰土剖面硅铁铝元素分布特征——以贵州省晴隆县为例. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(5): 777-785.
[8] Xiao S Y, Shu Y G, Chen M J. Soil erosion of different vegetation types in karst plateau Canyon area. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 30-35, 81.
肖盛杨, 舒英格, 陈梦军. 喀斯特高原峡谷区不同植被类型的土壤抗蚀性. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4): 30-35, 81.
[9] Peng W J, Shu Y G. Ecological security and evolution process of cultivated land landscape in counties of karst mountainous areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(3): 852-865.
彭文君, 舒英格. 喀斯特山区县域耕地景观生态安全及演变过程. 生态学报, 2018, 38(3): 852-865.
[10] He X, Wen X Q, Shu Y G, et al. Effects of land use patterns on soil quality traits in karst rocky desertification areas. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(9): 234-238.
何秀, 文小琴, 舒英格, 等. 喀斯特石漠化区土地利用方式对土壤质量性状的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(9): 234-238.
[11] Shi Y C, Shu Y G. Analysis of temporal and spatial variation characteristics and driving factors of karst rocky desertification——Taking Qinglong County of Guizhou as an example. Forestry Resource Management, 2017, 38(1): 135-143, 152.
史迎春, 舒英格. 喀斯特石漠化时空变化特征及驱动因子分析——以贵州晴隆县为例. 林业资源管理, 2017, 38(1): 135-143, 152.
[12] Zhao Y Y, Shu S M. Fractal characteristics of soil structure and its effects on soil corrosion resistance and impact resistance in typical forest land in the water source area of central Guizhou. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(5): 6-11.
赵洋毅, 舒树淼. 滇中水源区典型林地土壤结构分形特征及其对土壤抗蚀、抗冲性的影响. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(5): 6-11.
[13] Lu H M, Wang S J. Changes of soil organic carbon and nitrogen during rocky desertification in Huajiang small watershed. Earth and Environment, 2006, 34(4): 41-46.
卢红梅, 王世杰. 花江小流域石漠化过程中的土壤有机碳氮的变化. 地球与环境, 2006, 34(4): 41-46.
[14] Long J, Li J, Deng Q Q, et al. Study on physicochemical properties and fractal characteristics of rocky desertification soil in karst mountain area of Guizhou. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 37(4): 635-639.
龙健, 李娟, 邓启琼, 等. 贵州喀斯特山区石漠化土壤理化性质及分形特征研究. 土壤通报, 2006, 37(4): 635-639.
[15] Hu N, Fu W L, Ma Z M, et al. Study on soil anti-corrosion and its fractal relationship with different structures in karst rocky desertification mountainous area. Carsologica Sinica, 2008, 27(2): 115-121.
胡宁, 傅瓦利, 马志敏, 等. 岩溶石漠化山地不同退耕模式土壤抗蚀性及其与结构体分形关系研究. 中国岩溶, 2008, 27(2): 115-121.
[16] Zhang Z W, Fu W L, Zhu Z X, et al. Fractals characterized limestone their relationships with soil region properties. Soils, 2009, 41(1): 90-96.
张治伟, 傅瓦利, 朱章雄, 等. 石灰岩区土壤分形特征及其与土壤性质的关系. 土壤, 2009, 41(1): 90-96.
[17] Xiong B, Wang J L, Zhang T W, et al. Karst mountain arable soil in Southeast granules using the variation characteristics. Carsologica Sinica, 2011, 30(3): 295-301.
熊波, 王建力, 张天文, 等. 渝东南岩溶山区耕地利用变化下土壤颗粒体积分形特征研究. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(3): 295-301.
[18] Zhang Z W, Zhu Z X, Wen Z L. Composition of soil microaggregates in karst mountainous areas and their relationship with soil properties. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(1): 123-128, 135.
张治伟, 朱章雄, 文志林. 岩溶山地土壤微团聚体组成及其与土壤性质的关系. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(1): 123-128, 135.
[19] Huang Z S, Fu Y H, Yu L F, et al. Fracture characteristics of soil organic carbon and fractal characteristics of soil aggregates in natural restoration of karst forest vegetation. Forest Research, 2015, 28(2): 277-283.
黄宗胜, 符裕红, 喻理飞, 等. 喀斯特森林植被自然恢复中土壤团聚体有机碳含量与团聚体分形特征. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(2): 277-283.
[20] Zeng J M, He B H, Su F, et al. Characteristics of soil microaggregates under different vegetation restorations in karst troughs and reverse slopes. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2019, 39(10): 109-115.
曾江敏, 何丙辉, 苏锋, 等. 喀斯特槽谷顺/逆向坡不同植被恢复下土壤微团聚体特征. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(10): 109-115.
[21] Wang P J, Dai Q H, Ding G J, et al. Fractal characteristics of soil during karst vegetation restoration. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(4): 178-182, 230.
王佩将, 戴全厚, 丁贵杰, 等. 喀斯特植被恢复过程中的土壤分形特征. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4): 178-182, 230.
[22] Li C L, Dai Q H, Yao Y. Study on fractal characteristics of soil with different rocky desertification degrees in Caohai. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 22(1): 158-162, 167.
李翠莲, 戴全厚, 姚云. 草海不同石漠化程度土壤分形特征研究. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(1): 158-162, 167.
[23] Nanjing Agricultural College. Analysis of soil agrochemical. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1980.
南京农学院. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 农业出版社, 1980.
[24] Yang P L, Luo Y P, Shi Y C. Fractal characteristics of soil characterized by particle size distribution. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1993, 38(20): 1896-1899.
杨培岭, 罗远培, 石元春. 用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征. 科学通报, 1993, 38(20): 1896-1899.
[25] Tang J, Dang T H, Xue J, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil aggregate characteristics of coal dumps in coal mines in the Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(16): 5067-5077.
唐骏, 党廷辉, 薛江, 等. 植被恢复对黄土区煤矿排土场土壤团聚体特征的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16): 5067-5077.
[26] Zhong X F, Chen Z, Liu W J, et al. Effects of different vegetation on soil microaggregate composition and fractal in Jiangbin Park, Fuzhou. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 32(6): 96-102.
钟羡芳, 陈哲, 刘炜杰, 等. 福州江滨公园不同植被对土壤微团聚体组成及分形的影响. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 32(6): 96-102.
[27] Zhang C S, Fan S H, Qi L H, et al. Fractal characteristics of soil microaggregates in typical bamboo forests in northern Fujian. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(6): 170-175.
张昌顺, 范少辉, 漆良华, 等. 闽北典型毛竹林土壤微团聚体分形特征研究. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(6): 170-175.
[28] Liu X Z, Li X, Xiang Y, et al. Fractal characteristics of soil particles in the dam area of Shu'erliang small watershed. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 25(2): 337-341, 381.
刘秀珍, 李翔, 向云, 等. 树儿梁小流域坝地土壤颗粒的分形特征. 核农学报, 2011, 25(2): 337-341, 381.
[29] Gan F L, Wang T, He B H, et al. Soil composition and typing characteristics of different vegetations in Wenchuan earthquake area. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(1): 84-91.
甘凤玲, 王涛, 何丙辉, 等. 汶川震区不同植被下土壤组成及其分型特征. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1): 84-91.