Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 167-176.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020098
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ning ZHANG(), Yun-xin CAO, Wei XU, Zhi-hui CAHNG()
Received:
2020-03-07
Revised:
2020-09-09
Online:
2021-03-20
Published:
2021-03-09
Contact:
Zhi-hui CAHNG
Ning ZHANG, Yun-xin CAO, Wei XU, Zhi-hui CAHNG. Effects of biosolids on the growth and auxin metabolism of Poa pratensis under drought stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 167-176.
含水量 Water content (%) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (N, mg·g-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (P, mg·g-1) | 全钾 Total potassium (K, mg·g-1) | 腐殖酸 Humic acid (%) | 生长素 IAA (μg·g-1) | 色氨酸 Tryptophan (TPR, μg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.7 | 66.6 | 68.9 | 13.3 | 40.0 | 0.095 | 1.328 |
Table 1 Properties of biosolids
含水量 Water content (%) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (N, mg·g-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (P, mg·g-1) | 全钾 Total potassium (K, mg·g-1) | 腐殖酸 Humic acid (%) | 生长素 IAA (μg·g-1) | 色氨酸 Tryptophan (TPR, μg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.7 | 66.6 | 68.9 | 13.3 | 40.0 | 0.095 | 1.328 |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 7.6bA | 7.4abAB | 7.1bB | 7.1bB | 7.8aA |
IBA | 7.6bA | 7.4abAB | 7.4abAB | 7.2bB | 7.7aA | |
UB | 7.7bA | 7.7aA | 7.6**aA | 7.5**abA | 7.8aA | |
TB | 7.8abAB | 7.8aAB | 7.8**aAB | 7.6**aB | 8.0aA | |
TRP | 7.6bA | 7.6abA | 7.5*abA | 7.3abA | 7.8aA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 7.5bA | 6.8cB | 5.5dC | 4.3fD | 5.8dC |
IBA | 7.5bA | 6.9bcB | 6.0cC | 4.8eD | 6.5**cBC | |
UB | 8.2**abA | 7.6**abB | 6.8**bC | 5.9**cD | 6.9**bcC | |
TB | 8.3**aA | 7.5**abB | 6.6**bC | 5.9**cD | 7.1**bC | |
TRP | 7.7bA | 7.2bAB | 5.9cdC | 5.4**dC | 6.8**bcB |
Table 2 Effects of biosolids on turfgrass quality of P. pratensis under two water conditions
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 7.6bA | 7.4abAB | 7.1bB | 7.1bB | 7.8aA |
IBA | 7.6bA | 7.4abAB | 7.4abAB | 7.2bB | 7.7aA | |
UB | 7.7bA | 7.7aA | 7.6**aA | 7.5**abA | 7.8aA | |
TB | 7.8abAB | 7.8aAB | 7.8**aAB | 7.6**aB | 8.0aA | |
TRP | 7.6bA | 7.6abA | 7.5*abA | 7.3abA | 7.8aA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 7.5bA | 6.8cB | 5.5dC | 4.3fD | 5.8dC |
IBA | 7.5bA | 6.9bcB | 6.0cC | 4.8eD | 6.5**cBC | |
UB | 8.2**abA | 7.6**abB | 6.8**bC | 5.9**cD | 6.9**bcC | |
TB | 8.3**aA | 7.5**abB | 6.6**bC | 5.9**cD | 7.1**bC | |
TRP | 7.7bA | 7.2bAB | 5.9cdC | 5.4**dC | 6.8**bcB |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 0.325cA | 0.331cA | 0.352dA | 0.343abA | 0.242bB |
IBA | 0.364cB | 0.395cB | 0.461**cA | 0.383aB | 0.217bC | |
UB | 0.459**bA | 0.472**bA | 0.428**cA | 0.393aA | 0.253abB | |
TB | 0.538**aA | 0.410*bcC | 0.477**bcB | 0.425**aC | 0.292abD | |
TRP | 0.410bcB | 0.385cB | 0.489**bcA | 0.406*aB | 0.236bC | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 0.355cB | 0.477bA | 0.500bcA | 0.222bC | 0.298abB |
IBA | 0.356cCD | 0.461bcB | 0.579*abA | 0.401*aBC | 0.293abD | |
UB | 0.358cB | 0.557*aA | 0.528bA | 0.249bC | 0.232*abC | |
TB | 0.366cB | 0.547*aA | 0.576*abA | 0.379*aB | 0.305aB | |
TRP | 0.354cCD | 0.461bcB | 0.597**aA | 0.409*aBC | 0.305aD |
Table 3 Effects of biosolids on leaf carotenoid content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (mg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 0.325cA | 0.331cA | 0.352dA | 0.343abA | 0.242bB |
IBA | 0.364cB | 0.395cB | 0.461**cA | 0.383aB | 0.217bC | |
UB | 0.459**bA | 0.472**bA | 0.428**cA | 0.393aA | 0.253abB | |
TB | 0.538**aA | 0.410*bcC | 0.477**bcB | 0.425**aC | 0.292abD | |
TRP | 0.410bcB | 0.385cB | 0.489**bcA | 0.406*aB | 0.236bC | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 0.355cB | 0.477bA | 0.500bcA | 0.222bC | 0.298abB |
IBA | 0.356cCD | 0.461bcB | 0.579*abA | 0.401*aBC | 0.293abD | |
UB | 0.358cB | 0.557*aA | 0.528bA | 0.249bC | 0.232*abC | |
TB | 0.366cB | 0.547*aA | 0.576*abA | 0.379*aB | 0.305aB | |
TRP | 0.354cCD | 0.461bcB | 0.597**aA | 0.409*aBC | 0.305aD |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 2.70cA | 1.92cB | 2.17deB | 2.26cAB | 2.35bcAB |
IBA | 2.61cBC | 2.96**bAB | 2.51*dC | 2.73bcABC | 3.06**abA | |
UB | 3.24bcBC | 2.85**bC | 4.33**aA | 3.66**aAB | 3.59**aABC | |
TB | 3.11bcC | 3.20**bC | 4.43**aA | 4.01**aB | 3.20**abC | |
TRP | 2.89cA | 2.90**bA | 3.36**bA | 2.95**bA | 2.90*bA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 3.51bA | 3.02bB | 2.10eC | 1.39dD | 2.23cC |
IBA | 3.94abA | 3.39abB | 2.89**cC | 2.12**cD | 2.91bC | |
UB | 4.17aA | 3.84**aA | 3.09**bcB | 2.38**cC | 3.35**abB | |
TB | 4.04aA | 3.84**aA | 3.21**bcB | 2.67**bcC | 3.39**abB | |
TRP | 3.95abA | 3.39abAB | 2.69*cdBC | 2.26**cC | 3.28**abAB |
Table 4 Effects of biosolids on leaf chlorophyll content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (mg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 2.70cA | 1.92cB | 2.17deB | 2.26cAB | 2.35bcAB |
IBA | 2.61cBC | 2.96**bAB | 2.51*dC | 2.73bcABC | 3.06**abA | |
UB | 3.24bcBC | 2.85**bC | 4.33**aA | 3.66**aAB | 3.59**aABC | |
TB | 3.11bcC | 3.20**bC | 4.43**aA | 4.01**aB | 3.20**abC | |
TRP | 2.89cA | 2.90**bA | 3.36**bA | 2.95**bA | 2.90*bA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 3.51bA | 3.02bB | 2.10eC | 1.39dD | 2.23cC |
IBA | 3.94abA | 3.39abB | 2.89**cC | 2.12**cD | 2.91bC | |
UB | 4.17aA | 3.84**aA | 3.09**bcB | 2.38**cC | 3.35**abB | |
TB | 4.04aA | 3.84**aA | 3.21**bcB | 2.67**bcC | 3.39**abB | |
TRP | 3.95abA | 3.39abAB | 2.69*cdBC | 2.26**cC | 3.28**abAB |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 4.36bA | 4.42bA | 4.21bA | 4.08cA | 4.11bcA |
IBA | 5.24abA | 4.90abA | 5.02**abA | 4.85**bA | 4.92abA | |
UB | 5.26abA | 5.15**aA | 5.08**abA | 5.43**abA | 5.44aA | |
TB | 5.31abA | 5.25**aA | 5.41**aA | 5.79**aA | 5.66aA | |
TRP | 4.79bA | 5.09*aA | 4.97**abA | 5.26**abA | 5.55aA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 4.28bA | 3.67cB | 2.90cC | 2.24eD | 3.09cBC |
IBA | 5.21*abA | 4.35*bB | 3.19cC | 2.77deC | 3.21cC | |
UB | 5.32*abA | 5.22**aA | 4.53**bAB | 3.81**cdB | 4.62bAB | |
TB | 5.88**aA | 5.39**aAB | 4.65**bBC | 4.00**cC | 4.53bBC | |
TRP | 4.97bA | 4.43*bB | 3.43cCD | 3.15*dD | 3.64cC |
Table 5 Effects of biosolids on leaf photosynthetic rate of P. pratensis under two water conditions (μmol·m-2 ·s-1 )
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 4.36bA | 4.42bA | 4.21bA | 4.08cA | 4.11bcA |
IBA | 5.24abA | 4.90abA | 5.02**abA | 4.85**bA | 4.92abA | |
UB | 5.26abA | 5.15**aA | 5.08**abA | 5.43**abA | 5.44aA | |
TB | 5.31abA | 5.25**aA | 5.41**aA | 5.79**aA | 5.66aA | |
TRP | 4.79bA | 5.09*aA | 4.97**abA | 5.26**abA | 5.55aA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 4.28bA | 3.67cB | 2.90cC | 2.24eD | 3.09cBC |
IBA | 5.21*abA | 4.35*bB | 3.19cC | 2.77deC | 3.21cC | |
UB | 5.32*abA | 5.22**aA | 4.53**bAB | 3.81**cdB | 4.62bAB | |
TB | 5.88**aA | 5.39**aAB | 4.65**bBC | 4.00**cC | 4.53bBC | |
TRP | 4.97bA | 4.43*bB | 3.43cCD | 3.15*dD | 3.64cC |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 2.076bAB | 2.191abA | 1.592abB |
IBA | 2.436abA | 2.263abA | 0.767*bB | |
UB | 2.897**abA | 2.553**aB | 1.336bC | |
TB | 3.204**abA | 2.960**aA | 2.447**abB | |
TRP | 3.684**aA | 2.438**abB | 1.302bC | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.116bC | 1.360bB | 1.565abA |
IBA | 1.783bB | 2.515aA | 1.505abC | |
UB | 1.952bB | 2.823aA | 2.598aA | |
TB | 2.262abB | 2.602aA | 2.383abAB | |
TRP | 2.393abB | 2.974aA | 2.419abB |
Table 6 Effects of biosolids on root TRP content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (μg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 2.076bAB | 2.191abA | 1.592abB |
IBA | 2.436abA | 2.263abA | 0.767*bB | |
UB | 2.897**abA | 2.553**aB | 1.336bC | |
TB | 3.204**abA | 2.960**aA | 2.447**abB | |
TRP | 3.684**aA | 2.438**abB | 1.302bC | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.116bC | 1.360bB | 1.565abA |
IBA | 1.783bB | 2.515aA | 1.505abC | |
UB | 1.952bB | 2.823aA | 2.598aA | |
TB | 2.262abB | 2.602aA | 2.383abAB | |
TRP | 2.393abB | 2.974aA | 2.419abB |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 3.641aA | 3.926aA | 2.465fgB | 1.554eC | 2.240dB |
IBA | 2.109**bcB | 1.662**bcC | 2.849**fA | 1.634deC | 2.178dB | |
UB | 1.644**deC | 1.702**bC | 2.678fgB | 1.047**hD | 3.086cA | |
TB | 2.148**bcB | 1.706**bC | 2.074**gB | 1.236**fD | 2.844cdA | |
TRP | 2.007**cdC | 1.167**eD | 4.538**eA | 1.101**gD | 2.844cdB | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.920cdC | 1.300dC | 10.019cA | 1.948dC | 4.986abB |
IBA | 1.523**eD | 1.304dD | 6.881**dA | 3.674**bB | 2.519cdC | |
UB | 1.856dD | 1.601**cD | 21.569**aA | 2.475cC | 3.882bB | |
TB | 2.094**cC | 0.875**fD | 12.534**bA | 1.819deC | 5.105aB | |
TRP | 2.323**bC | 1.152**eD | 13.251**bA | 4.994**aB | 4.388bB |
Table 7 Effects of biosolids on leaf TRP content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (μg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 3.641aA | 3.926aA | 2.465fgB | 1.554eC | 2.240dB |
IBA | 2.109**bcB | 1.662**bcC | 2.849**fA | 1.634deC | 2.178dB | |
UB | 1.644**deC | 1.702**bC | 2.678fgB | 1.047**hD | 3.086cA | |
TB | 2.148**bcB | 1.706**bC | 2.074**gB | 1.236**fD | 2.844cdA | |
TRP | 2.007**cdC | 1.167**eD | 4.538**eA | 1.101**gD | 2.844cdB | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.920cdC | 1.300dC | 10.019cA | 1.948dC | 4.986abB |
IBA | 1.523**eD | 1.304dD | 6.881**dA | 3.674**bB | 2.519cdC | |
UB | 1.856dD | 1.601**cD | 21.569**aA | 2.475cC | 3.882bB | |
TB | 2.094**cC | 0.875**fD | 12.534**bA | 1.819deC | 5.105aB | |
TRP | 2.323**bC | 1.152**eD | 13.251**bA | 4.994**aB | 4.388bB |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 0.645bcA | 0.632bA | 0.596bB |
IBA | 0.697bA | 0.668bB | 0.686bA | |
UB | 0.704bA | 0.648bB | 0.625bC | |
TB | 0.716bA | 0.637bC | 0.663bB | |
TRP | 0.727bA | 0.673bB | 0.667bB | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 0.561cC | 0.668bA | 0.635bB |
IBA | 0.631bcB | 0.668bB | 0.810**aA | |
UB | 0.709**bAB | 0.748**abA | 0.677bB | |
TB | 0.974**aA | 0.753**aB | 0.672bB | |
TRP | 0.645*bcB | 0.711**abA | 0.648bB |
Table 8 Effects of biosolids on soil IAA content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (μg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 0.645bcA | 0.632bA | 0.596bB |
IBA | 0.697bA | 0.668bB | 0.686bA | |
UB | 0.704bA | 0.648bB | 0.625bC | |
TB | 0.716bA | 0.637bC | 0.663bB | |
TRP | 0.727bA | 0.673bB | 0.667bB | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 0.561cC | 0.668bA | 0.635bB |
IBA | 0.631bcB | 0.668bB | 0.810**aA | |
UB | 0.709**bAB | 0.748**abA | 0.677bB | |
TB | 0.974**aA | 0.753**aB | 0.672bB | |
TRP | 0.645*bcB | 0.711**abA | 0.648bB |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 1.330aB | 1.245aB | 1.620abA |
IBA | 1.834aA | 1.151aC | 1.436abB | |
UB | 1.730aA | 1.295aB | 1.167*bC | |
TB | 1.595aA | 1.301aB | 1.659aA | |
TRP | 1.495aA | 1.293aB | 1.466abA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.287aA | 1.257aB | 1.069bC |
IBA | 1.589aA | 1.311aB | 1.477abA | |
UB | 1.611aA | 1.307aB | 1.686aA | |
TB | 1.657aB | 1.487aC | 1.756*aA | |
TRP | 1.609aA | 1.337aB | 1.590abA |
Table 9 Effects of biosolids on root IAA content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (μg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 1.330aB | 1.245aB | 1.620abA |
IBA | 1.834aA | 1.151aC | 1.436abB | |
UB | 1.730aA | 1.295aB | 1.167*bC | |
TB | 1.595aA | 1.301aB | 1.659aA | |
TRP | 1.495aA | 1.293aB | 1.466abA | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.287aA | 1.257aB | 1.069bC |
IBA | 1.589aA | 1.311aB | 1.477abA | |
UB | 1.611aA | 1.307aB | 1.686aA | |
TB | 1.657aB | 1.487aC | 1.756*aA | |
TRP | 1.609aA | 1.337aB | 1.590abA |
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 1.384dC | 1.808cA | 1.683cdAB | 1.772aA | 1.594cB |
IBA | 1.432cdC | 1.512**deC | 1.957**bcA | 1.101**cD | 1.759bB | |
UB | 1.270deD | 1.568**dB | 1.598cdB | 1.445**bC | 1.829bA | |
TB | 1.994**aA | 1.317**eC | 1.594cdB | 1.501**abB | 1.549cdB | |
TRP | 1.757**bA | 1.803cA | 1.349**dD | 1.607*abB | 1.481dC | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.154eD | 1.854cB | 2.306bA | 1.592bC | 2.280aA |
IBA | 1.328deB | 1.571**dA | 1.636*cdA | 1.324**cB | 1.414dAB | |
UB | 1.407*dC | 1.390**eC | 1.833cA | 1.754**aA | 1.606cB | |
TB | 1.483**cdC | 2.367**aB | 3.614**aA | 1.414**cC | 1.624cC | |
TRP | 1.581**cB | 2.002bA | 2.017bcA | 1.406**cB | 1.601cB |
Table 10 Effects of biosolids on leaf IAA content of P. pratensis under two water conditions (μg·g-1)
水分处理 Moisture | 基质处理 Matrixes | 日期Date (月-日Month-day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-07 | 07-14 | 08-03 | 08-11 | 08-19 | ||
充分浇水Sufficient water | CK | 1.384dC | 1.808cA | 1.683cdAB | 1.772aA | 1.594cB |
IBA | 1.432cdC | 1.512**deC | 1.957**bcA | 1.101**cD | 1.759bB | |
UB | 1.270deD | 1.568**dB | 1.598cdB | 1.445**bC | 1.829bA | |
TB | 1.994**aA | 1.317**eC | 1.594cdB | 1.501**abB | 1.549cdB | |
TRP | 1.757**bA | 1.803cA | 1.349**dD | 1.607*abB | 1.481dC | |
干旱胁迫Drought stress | CK | 1.154eD | 1.854cB | 2.306bA | 1.592bC | 2.280aA |
IBA | 1.328deB | 1.571**dA | 1.636*cdA | 1.324**cB | 1.414dAB | |
UB | 1.407*dC | 1.390**eC | 1.833cA | 1.754**aA | 1.606cB | |
TB | 1.483**cdC | 2.367**aB | 3.614**aA | 1.414**cC | 1.624cC | |
TRP | 1.581**cB | 2.002bA | 2.017bcA | 1.406**cB | 1.601cB |
1 | Institute of Standards and Quotas, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. Guidelines for the implementation of sludge disposal standards in urban sewage treatment plants . Beijing: China Standards Press, 2011: 2. |
住房和城乡建设部标准定额研究所. 城镇污水处理厂污泥处置系列标准实施指南. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011: 2. | |
2 | Cui C H. Application of products derived from sewage sludge to farm land and evaluation of their organic matter quality. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2008. |
崔春红. 污泥农肥化施用效果及肥料中有机质质量的评价研究. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2008. | |
3 | Lemmer H, Nitschke L. Vitamin content of four sludge fractions in the activated sludge wastewater treatment process. Water Research, 1994, 28(3): 737-739. |
4 | Sanchez-Monedero M A, Roig A, Cegarra J, et al. Relationships between water-soluble carbohydrate and phenol fractions and the humification indices of different organic wastes during composting. Bioresource Technology, 1999, 70: 193-201. |
5 | Zhang X Z, Ervin E H, Evanylo G K. Impact of biosolids on hormone metabolism in drought-stressed tall fescue. Crop Science, 2009, 49: 1893-1901. |
6 | Zhang X Z, Schmidt R E. Antioxidant responses to hormone-containing product in Kentucky bluegrass subject to drought. Crop Science, 1999, 39: 545-551. |
7 | Higgins M J, Adams G, Chen Y, et al. Role of protein, amino acids, and enzyme activity on odor production from anaerobically digested and dewatered biosolids. Water Environment Research, 2008, 80: 127-135. |
8 | Yu F F. Effect of biosolids on Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) drought stress. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012. |
于芳芳. 生物污泥对草地早熟禾抗旱性影响研究. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012. | |
9 | Bettina T. Plant responses to environmental stresses: From phytohormones to genome reorganization. Phytochemistry, 2001, 56(6): 641-642. |
10 | Strivastava L M. Plant growth and development: Hormones and environment. San Diego: Academic Press, 2002. |
11 | Liu Y, Yu M L, Zhang R, et al.The relationship between endogenous hormone content and apomixis rate of wild Kentucky bluegrass in Gansu Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 99-111. |
刘燕, 于美玲, 张然, 等. 甘肃野生草地早熟禾内源激素含量的变化与无融合生殖率的关系研究. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 99-111. | |
12 | Zhang X, Ervin E H. Cytokinin-containing seaweed and humic acid extracts associated with creeping bentgrass leaf cytokinins and drought resistance. Crop Science, 2004, 44: 1737-1745. |
13 | Fan Z Y, Liu Q S, Zhang P. Comparison of the kjeldahl method and the dumas method for total nitrogen determination in grasses. Modern Scientific Instruments, 2007(1): 46-47. |
范志影, 刘庆生, 张萍. 用凯氏法和杜马斯法测定植物样品中的全氮.现代科学仪器, 2007(1): 46-47. | |
14 | Cao Y X, Yu F F, Bai M, et al. Impact of sewage sludge and indole butyric acid on growth and drought tolerance of Poa pratensis under drought stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 109-119. |
曹允馨, 于芳芳, 白梅, 等.污泥和吲哚丁酸对草地早熟禾的生长和耐旱性的影响研究. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 109-119. | |
15 | Li X Y. Noticeable problems in photosynthetic characteristics research by Li-6400. Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 43(2): 57-59. |
李晓宇. 使用Li-6400进行光合特性研究应注意的问题. 林业科技, 2018, 43(2): 57-59. | |
16 | Zhao R. Research on the resistance of tall fescue with foreign DREB1A gene and their filial generation. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010. |
赵汝. 转DREB1A基因高羊茅及其子代的抗性研究. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010. | |
17 | Edlund A, Eklof S, Sundberg B, et al. A microscale technique for gas chromatomatography-mass spectrometry measurements of picogram amounts of indole-3-acetic acid in plant tissues. Plant Physiology, 1995, 108(3): 1043-1047. |
18 | Zhuo L Q. Biosolids impact on nitrogen metabolism and root growth of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.). Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013. |
禚来强. 污泥对草地早熟禾氮代谢和根系生长的影响.北京: 北京林业大学, 2013. | |
19 | Qi F. Study on the effects of traffic stress on the tillering and physiological regulation of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.). Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012. |
奇凤. 践踏处理对高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea)和草地早熟禾(Poa pratensis L.)分蘖生长影响及生理调控研究. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012. | |
20 | Han C, Liu Y, Dong H, et al. Influences of biosolids on drought resistance of tall fescue. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(3): 127-135. |
韩朝, 刘洋, 董慧, 等. 污泥对高羊茅抗旱性的影响研究. 草业学报, 2014, 23(3): 127-135. | |
21 | Shen Z P, Duo L A, Zhao S L. Effects of air dried sewage sludge leachate after remediation on initial growth and heavy metal accumulation of lolium perenne. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 32(5): 937-943. |
沈志平, 多立安, 赵树兰. 风干污泥修复后淋洗液对黑麦草初期生长与重金属富集的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(5): 937-943. | |
22 | Zhao X L, Xu D F, Li Z H, et al. Influence of municipal sludge land application to ryegrass physical and chemical properties and quality. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010, 29(Supple 1): 59-63. |
赵晓莉, 徐德福, 李泽宏, 等. 城市污泥的土地利用对黑麦草理化指标和品质的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(增刊1): 59-63. | |
23 | Hu M Y, Li H, Zhang Y J, et al. Photosynthesis and related physiological characteristics affected by exogenous glucose in wheat seedlings under water stress. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(4): 724-732. |
胡梦芸, 李辉, 张颖君, 等. 水分胁迫下葡萄糖对小麦幼苗光合作用和相关生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(4): 724-732. | |
24 | Tong F P, Fang W, Ma L Y, et al. Study on response of the contents of photosynthetic pigments of slash pine’s half-sib under water stress. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(11): 97-102. |
童方平, 方伟, 马履一, 等. 水分胁迫下湿地松优良半同胞家系光合色素的响应. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(11): 97-102. | |
25 | Fan M, Jin L P, Huang S W, et al. Effects of drought on gene expressions of key enzymes in carotenoid and flavonoid biosynthesis in potato. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008, 35(4): 535-542. |
范敏, 金黎平, 黄三文, 等. 干旱胁迫对马铃薯类黄酮和类胡萝卜素合成关键酶基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(4): 535-542. | |
26 | Schilling C H, Letscher D, Palsson B. Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2000, 203(3): 229-248. |
27 | Patten C, Glick B. Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1996, 42: 207-220. |
28 | Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2007, 31: 425-448. |
29 | Woodward A, Bartel B. Auxin: Regulation, action, and interaction. Annales Botanici Fennici, 2005, 95: 707-735. |
30 | Zhong X H. Studies on the regulation mechanism of tryptophan on tissue culture and growth in strawberry. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2004. |
钟晓红. 色氨酸对草莓离体培养与生长发育的调控机理研究.长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2004. | |
31 | Chen Z D, Huang J J, He J M, et al. Influence of L-tryptophan applied to soil on yield and nutrient uptake of cabbage. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1997(2): 200-205. |
陈振德, 黄俊杰, 何金明, 等. 土施L-色氨酸对甘蓝产量和养分吸收的影响. 土壤学报, 1997(2): 200-205. | |
32 | Yu A D, Yu F F, Teng K, et al. Effect of biosolids on drought resistance and cell antioxidant capacity of Poa pratensis. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(8): 1870-1878. |
于安东, 于芳芳, 滕珂, 等. 生物污泥对草地早熟禾耐旱及细胞抗氧化能力的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(8): 1870-1878. | |
33 | Xu Z H. Polar transport of auxin and its role in plant development regulation. Chinese Bulletin of Life Science, 1998(2): 52-54. |
许智宏. 生长素的极性运输及其在植物发育调控中的作用.生命科学, 1998(2): 52-54. |
[1] | Yi-yao HOU, Xiao LI, Rui-cai LONG, Qing-chuan YANG, Jun-mei KANG, Chang-hong GUO. Effect of overexpression of the alfalfa MsHB7 gene on drought tolerance of Arabidopsis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 170-179. |
[2] | Jin-qing ZHANG, Kui-ju NIU, Yu-zhu LI, Hui-ling MA. Factors inducing plant apomixis and its potential application in Kentucky bluegrass breeding [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 205-217. |
[3] | Zi-xin WANG, Guo-zheng HU, Hong-wei SHUI, Yi-qing GE, Ling HAN, Qing-zhu GAO, Ganjurjav HASBAGAN, Luo-bu DANJIU. Effect of seasonal timing of drought on carbon exchange in the alpine meadow ecosystem of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 24-33. |
[4] | Kai-qiang LIU, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Guo-ling LIANG, Xiang MA. Effects of drought stress on yield and dry matter accumulation and distribution of Avena sativa cv. Qingyan No.1 [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 177-188. |
[5] | Zhi-peng CHANG, Ying-ying SUN, Jia-yang LI, Chun-mei GONG. Cloning and transformation of the CkCAD gene in Caragana korshinskii and analysis of its drought resistance function [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 68-80. |
[6] | Wen-rong LUO, Guo-zheng HU, Ganjurjav H, Qing-zhu GAO, Yan LI, Yi-qing Ge, Yu LI, Shi-cheng HE, Luo-bu DANJIU. Effects of simulated drought on plant phenology and productivity in an alpine meadow in Northern Tibet [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 82-92. |
[7] | Hai-feng HE, Cheng-hong YAN, Na WU, Ji-li LIU, Yu-han JIA. Effects of different nitrogen levels on photosynthetic characteristics and drought resistance of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 107-115. |
[8] | Dong LI, Hong-tao SHEN, Yan-fang WANG, Yue-hua WANG, Li-jun WANG, Shi-min ZHAO, Ling LIU. Effects of exogenous melatonin on photosynthetic carbon assimilation and endogenous hormones in tobacco seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 130-139. |
[9] | Zhen-song LI, Li-qiang WAN, Shuo LI, Xiang-lin LI. Response of alfalfa root architecture and physiological characteristics to drought and rehydration [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 189-196. |
[10] | LU Jiao-yun, XIONG Jun-bo, ZHANG He-shan, TIAN Hong, YANG Hui-min, LIU Yang. Effects of water stress on yield, quality and trace element composition of alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 126-133. |
[11] | ZENG Ling-shuang, LI Pei-ying, SUN Xiao-fan, SUN Zong-jiu. A multi-trait evaluation of drought resistance of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) germplasm from different habitats in Xinjiang province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 155-169. |
[12] | ZHANG Yu-jun, SHANG Yi-shun, WANG Pu-chang, DING Lei-lei, ZHANG Wen, ZOU Chao. Effects of super absorbent polymers on growth and physiological characteristics of Sophora davidii vs. Panjiang seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 90-98. |
[13] | WANG Yong-chao, ZHANG Ying-lei, YAN Dong-liang, HE Ling-zhi, LI Zhuo, YAN Bo-wen, SHAO Rui-xin, GUO Jia-meng, YANG Qing-hua. Physiological role of γ-aminobutyric acid in protecting the photosynthetic system of maize seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 191-203. |
[14] | LI Ke, ZHOU Zhuang-yu, LI Si-ju, YAO Hao-zheng, ZHOU Ying, MIAO Yu-jing, TANG Xiao-qing, WANG Kang-cai. Growth, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant capacity responses of Schizonepeta tenuifolia to drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(5): 150-158. |
[15] | GAO Zi-qi, WANG Jia, TANG Yu-chen, WANG Ying-chun. Cloning and functional analysis of the gene NtUFGT in Nitraria tangutorum [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(5): 159-170. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||