Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 73-85.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021037
Previous Articles Next Articles
Xue WANG(), Xiao-jing LIU(), Ya-jiao ZHAO, Jing WANG
Received:
2021-01-26
Revised:
2021-03-08
Online:
2021-07-09
Published:
2021-07-09
Contact:
Xiao-jing LIU
Xue WANG, Xiao-jing LIU, Ya-jiao ZHAO, Jing WANG. Nitrogen utilization and interspecific feedback characteristics of intercropped alfalfa/oat with different root barriers[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 73-85.
材料 Materials | 氮素 水平 N level | 分隔 方式 Barriers | 分枝期 Branching stage (Ⅰ) | 现蕾期 Budding stage (Ⅱ) | 初花期 Initial blooming stage (Ⅲ) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上 Aboveground | 地下 Underground | 地上 Aboveground | 地下 Underground | 地上 Aboveground | 地下 Underground | |||
紫花苜蓿 Alfalfa | N210 | SA | 99.09±4.93a | 54.46±1.72a | 182.75±3.08ab | 115.70±2.45a | 200.10±1.87a | 135.83±0.68a |
A-O | 91.58±3.74a | 40.22±1.06c | 149.63±1.25c | 67.88±3.33b | 163.93±2.03b | 96.74±9.27c | ||
NA-O | 94.04±5.67a | 41.24±1.21bc | 166.35±3.29b | 74.82±2.07b | 171.61±10.23b | 109.03±0.60b | ||
PA-O | 102.43±6.63a | 45.74±1.83b | 186.63±9.02a | 84.65±2.31ab | 200.29±2.33a | 136.39±13.93a | ||
N21 | SA | 87.74±3.98a | 44.34±2.39a | 156.17±6.21a | 82.36±1.45a | 171.49±1.86a | 118.32±3.06a | |
A-O | 76.17±6.35a | 26.59±1.76c | 106.02±1.52c | 51.32±1.19c | 133.20±7.74c | 82.07±5.11b | ||
NA-O | 80.39±3.28a | 31.12±0.70bc | 125.82±1.34b | 59.07±3.98c | 148.23±2.83bc | 94.03±3.56ab | ||
PA-O | 85.67±3.30a | 33.57±2.77b | 146.43±5.86a | 65.71±3.49b | 162.13±5.24ab | 108.22±0.73a | ||
燕麦 Oat | N210 | SA | 63.48±1.90b | 7.90±0.61b | 146.02±2.00c | 16.40±0.73b | 186.57±6.61b | 28.38±1.37c |
A-O | 76.38±5.20a | 10.65±1.05a | 205.36±8.27a | 26.72±0.43a | 234.61±8.15a | 40.67±1.81a | ||
NA-O | 75.75±3.77a | 8.75±0.74ab | 172.17±6.41b | 22.79±3.67ab | 218.08±2.50a | 34.78±1.11b | ||
PA-O | 63.51±2.44b | 6.91±0.53b | 159.76±10.92bc | 18.08±3.90ab | 191.34±3.38b | 26.07±0.28c | ||
N21 | SA | 55.37±0.48c | 6.72±0.65ab | 132.62±4.58b | 12.50±0.86b | 119.59±4.85c | 19.79±0.76c | |
A-O | 80.92±1.36a | 8.28±0.65a | 185.32±9.09a | 21.16±1.94a | 187.12±6.35a | 34.21±0.70a | ||
NA-O | 65.31±2.50b | 5.74±0.26b | 158.15±7.75ab | 18.11±1.82a | 172.28±7.45a | 29.45±0.65b | ||
PA-O | 60.89±3.59bc | 5.35±0.28b | 141.30±12.89b | 11.92±1.15b | 149.65±2.72b | 18.48±1.14c |
Table 1 Effect of different root partitions and N level on N accumulating of alfalfa and oat (mg·plant-1)
材料 Materials | 氮素 水平 N level | 分隔 方式 Barriers | 分枝期 Branching stage (Ⅰ) | 现蕾期 Budding stage (Ⅱ) | 初花期 Initial blooming stage (Ⅲ) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上 Aboveground | 地下 Underground | 地上 Aboveground | 地下 Underground | 地上 Aboveground | 地下 Underground | |||
紫花苜蓿 Alfalfa | N210 | SA | 99.09±4.93a | 54.46±1.72a | 182.75±3.08ab | 115.70±2.45a | 200.10±1.87a | 135.83±0.68a |
A-O | 91.58±3.74a | 40.22±1.06c | 149.63±1.25c | 67.88±3.33b | 163.93±2.03b | 96.74±9.27c | ||
NA-O | 94.04±5.67a | 41.24±1.21bc | 166.35±3.29b | 74.82±2.07b | 171.61±10.23b | 109.03±0.60b | ||
PA-O | 102.43±6.63a | 45.74±1.83b | 186.63±9.02a | 84.65±2.31ab | 200.29±2.33a | 136.39±13.93a | ||
N21 | SA | 87.74±3.98a | 44.34±2.39a | 156.17±6.21a | 82.36±1.45a | 171.49±1.86a | 118.32±3.06a | |
A-O | 76.17±6.35a | 26.59±1.76c | 106.02±1.52c | 51.32±1.19c | 133.20±7.74c | 82.07±5.11b | ||
NA-O | 80.39±3.28a | 31.12±0.70bc | 125.82±1.34b | 59.07±3.98c | 148.23±2.83bc | 94.03±3.56ab | ||
PA-O | 85.67±3.30a | 33.57±2.77b | 146.43±5.86a | 65.71±3.49b | 162.13±5.24ab | 108.22±0.73a | ||
燕麦 Oat | N210 | SA | 63.48±1.90b | 7.90±0.61b | 146.02±2.00c | 16.40±0.73b | 186.57±6.61b | 28.38±1.37c |
A-O | 76.38±5.20a | 10.65±1.05a | 205.36±8.27a | 26.72±0.43a | 234.61±8.15a | 40.67±1.81a | ||
NA-O | 75.75±3.77a | 8.75±0.74ab | 172.17±6.41b | 22.79±3.67ab | 218.08±2.50a | 34.78±1.11b | ||
PA-O | 63.51±2.44b | 6.91±0.53b | 159.76±10.92bc | 18.08±3.90ab | 191.34±3.38b | 26.07±0.28c | ||
N21 | SA | 55.37±0.48c | 6.72±0.65ab | 132.62±4.58b | 12.50±0.86b | 119.59±4.85c | 19.79±0.76c | |
A-O | 80.92±1.36a | 8.28±0.65a | 185.32±9.09a | 21.16±1.94a | 187.12±6.35a | 34.21±0.70a | ||
NA-O | 65.31±2.50b | 5.74±0.26b | 158.15±7.75ab | 18.11±1.82a | 172.28±7.45a | 29.45±0.65b | ||
PA-O | 60.89±3.59bc | 5.35±0.28b | 141.30±12.89b | 11.92±1.15b | 149.65±2.72b | 18.48±1.14c |
材料 Materials | 氮素水平 N level | 分隔 方式 Barriers | 分枝期Branching stage (Ⅰ) | 现蕾期Budding stage (Ⅱ) | 初花期Initial blooming stage (Ⅲ) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总根长 TRL (cm) | 根表面积 RSA (cm2) | 根平均直径 RAD (mm) | 根体积 RV (cm3) | 总根长 TRL (cm) | 根表面积 RSA (cm2) | 根平均直径 RAD (mm) | 根体积 RV (cm3) | 总根长 TRL (cm) | 根表面积 RSA (cm2) | 根平均直径 RAD (mm) | 根体积 RV (cm3) | |||
紫花苜蓿 Alfalfa | N210 | SA | 119.35±0.58c | 27.39±0.38a | 0.46±0.01a | 0.20±0.01a | 164.97±1.44b | 47.66±0.84a | 0.58±0.01a | 0.43±0.02a | 185.49±0.95d | 66.17±0.35a | 0.68±0.03a | 0.67±0.05a |
A-O | 143.27±1.53a | 26.11±0.23a | 0.36±0.01c | 0.15±0.01b | 183.72±5.35a | 40.13±0.52b | 0.44±0.02d | 0.27±0.01d | 216.62±1.23a | 60.25±1.39c | 0.56±0.02c | 0.53±0.04b | ||
NA-O | 134.99±2.31b | 25.88±0.70a | 0.38±0.02c | 0.16±0.02b | 172.64±2.16b | 40.54±0.17b | 0.47±0.01c | 0.30±0.01c | 205.61±2.64b | 62.47±1.28bc | 0.61±0.01b | 0.60±0.03ab | ||
PA-O | 122.89±0.92c | 25.50±0.97a | 0.41±0.03b | 0.17±0.02b | 164.98±0.70b | 40.98±0.13b | 0.49±0.01b | 0.32±0.00b | 199.89±1.23c | 65.56±0.85ab | 0.65±0.02a | 0.67±0.04a | ||
N21 | SA | 130.57±0.96c | 26.97±0.79a | 0.42±0.02a | 0.18±0.02a | 180.58±0.88bc | 45.11±1.88a | 0.50±0.03a | 0.35±0.05a | 213.40±2.21b | 63.88±1.38a | 0.62±0.02a | 0.65±0.05a | |
A-O | 153.32±2.17a | 24.01±0.70b | 0.31±0.01c | 0.12±0.01b | 191.00±2.48a | 38.65±0.80b | 0.41±0.02c | 0.25±0.02b | 225.88±1.24a | 61.00±1.60a | 0.54±0.02c | 0.52±0.05b | ||
NA-O | 142.05±1.57b | 24.34±0.25b | 0.34±0.02b | 0.13±0.01b | 184.67±1.66b | 39.64±0.24b | 0.43±0.01bc | 0.27±0.01b | 213.15±3.22b | 60.76±2.39a | 0.57±0.03bc | 0.54±0.06b | ||
PA-O | 135.19±0.34c | 24.28±0.54b | 0.36±0.01b | 0.14±0.01b | 178.36±1.35c | 39.73±0.45b | 0.45±0.01b | 0.28±0.01b | 210.03±3.10b | 62.97±1.91a | 0.60±0.02ab | 0.59±0.05ab | ||
燕麦 Oat | N210 | SO | 206.43±2.98b | 51.78±1.18b | 0.50±0.03ab | 0.41±0.04b | 212.69±2.70ab | 53.97±0.71c | 0.51±0.02c | 0.43±0.02c | 239.10±1.70b | 71.34±1.65bc | 0.60±0.02b | 0.67±0.05bc |
A-O | 215.32±3.16a | 56.96±0.58a | 0.53±0.01a | 0.47±0.02a | 223.28±4.72a | 66.27±1.17a | 0.60±0.03a | 0.62±0.04a | 252.38±0.01a | 86.54±1.80a | 0.68±0.03a | 0.93±0.07a | ||
NA-O | 203.86±1.78b | 50.62±0.76b | 0.50±0.02ab | 0.39±0.03b | 213.92±4.09ab | 60.90±0.52b | 0.57±0.02ab | 0.54±0.02b | 242.46±3.45b | 75.57±0.63b | 0.62±0.02b | 0.74±0.04b | ||
PA-O | 193.08±0.77c | 45.10±0.69c | 0.47±0.01b | 0.33±0.02c | 207.13±0.87b | 55.93±0.85c | 0.54±0.01bc | 0.47±0.02c | 235.59±3.68b | 69.03±1.56c | 0.59±0.01b | 0.64±0.04c | ||
N21 | SO | 221.17±2.84a | 50.19±1.93b | 0.46±0.02ab | 0.36±0.04b | 231.14±3.25bc | 52.77±2.01b | 0.46±0.02bc | 0.38±0.04c | 273.59±3.59bc | 70.56±2.20c | 0.51±0.02c | 0.57±0.06c | |
A-O | 227.58±2.55a | 55.29±0.57a | 0.49±0.01a | 0.42±0.02a | 238.02±2.05ab | 62.99±1.65a | 0.53±0.02a | 0.53±0.05a | 285.78±2.33a | 88.33±0.31a | 0.62±0.01a | 0.86±0.02a | ||
NA-O | 220.87±6.30a | 48.01±2.21bc | 0.44±0.02bc | 0.33±0.04bc | 245.50±5.11a | 58.97±1.09a | 0.48±0.01b | 0.45±0.02b | 278.68±2.82ab | 80.15±1.44b | 0.58±0.01b | 0.72±0.03b | ||
PA-O | 218.30±3.84a | 44.77±0.46c | 0.41±0.01c | 0.29±0.01c | 221.93±5.28c | 50.93±1.31b | 0.45±0.01c | 0.36±0.03c | 263.88±3.66c | 68.38±0.41c | 0.50±0.01c | 0.53±0.02c |
Table 2 Effect of different root partitions and N level on root morphology of alfalfa and oat
材料 Materials | 氮素水平 N level | 分隔 方式 Barriers | 分枝期Branching stage (Ⅰ) | 现蕾期Budding stage (Ⅱ) | 初花期Initial blooming stage (Ⅲ) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总根长 TRL (cm) | 根表面积 RSA (cm2) | 根平均直径 RAD (mm) | 根体积 RV (cm3) | 总根长 TRL (cm) | 根表面积 RSA (cm2) | 根平均直径 RAD (mm) | 根体积 RV (cm3) | 总根长 TRL (cm) | 根表面积 RSA (cm2) | 根平均直径 RAD (mm) | 根体积 RV (cm3) | |||
紫花苜蓿 Alfalfa | N210 | SA | 119.35±0.58c | 27.39±0.38a | 0.46±0.01a | 0.20±0.01a | 164.97±1.44b | 47.66±0.84a | 0.58±0.01a | 0.43±0.02a | 185.49±0.95d | 66.17±0.35a | 0.68±0.03a | 0.67±0.05a |
A-O | 143.27±1.53a | 26.11±0.23a | 0.36±0.01c | 0.15±0.01b | 183.72±5.35a | 40.13±0.52b | 0.44±0.02d | 0.27±0.01d | 216.62±1.23a | 60.25±1.39c | 0.56±0.02c | 0.53±0.04b | ||
NA-O | 134.99±2.31b | 25.88±0.70a | 0.38±0.02c | 0.16±0.02b | 172.64±2.16b | 40.54±0.17b | 0.47±0.01c | 0.30±0.01c | 205.61±2.64b | 62.47±1.28bc | 0.61±0.01b | 0.60±0.03ab | ||
PA-O | 122.89±0.92c | 25.50±0.97a | 0.41±0.03b | 0.17±0.02b | 164.98±0.70b | 40.98±0.13b | 0.49±0.01b | 0.32±0.00b | 199.89±1.23c | 65.56±0.85ab | 0.65±0.02a | 0.67±0.04a | ||
N21 | SA | 130.57±0.96c | 26.97±0.79a | 0.42±0.02a | 0.18±0.02a | 180.58±0.88bc | 45.11±1.88a | 0.50±0.03a | 0.35±0.05a | 213.40±2.21b | 63.88±1.38a | 0.62±0.02a | 0.65±0.05a | |
A-O | 153.32±2.17a | 24.01±0.70b | 0.31±0.01c | 0.12±0.01b | 191.00±2.48a | 38.65±0.80b | 0.41±0.02c | 0.25±0.02b | 225.88±1.24a | 61.00±1.60a | 0.54±0.02c | 0.52±0.05b | ||
NA-O | 142.05±1.57b | 24.34±0.25b | 0.34±0.02b | 0.13±0.01b | 184.67±1.66b | 39.64±0.24b | 0.43±0.01bc | 0.27±0.01b | 213.15±3.22b | 60.76±2.39a | 0.57±0.03bc | 0.54±0.06b | ||
PA-O | 135.19±0.34c | 24.28±0.54b | 0.36±0.01b | 0.14±0.01b | 178.36±1.35c | 39.73±0.45b | 0.45±0.01b | 0.28±0.01b | 210.03±3.10b | 62.97±1.91a | 0.60±0.02ab | 0.59±0.05ab | ||
燕麦 Oat | N210 | SO | 206.43±2.98b | 51.78±1.18b | 0.50±0.03ab | 0.41±0.04b | 212.69±2.70ab | 53.97±0.71c | 0.51±0.02c | 0.43±0.02c | 239.10±1.70b | 71.34±1.65bc | 0.60±0.02b | 0.67±0.05bc |
A-O | 215.32±3.16a | 56.96±0.58a | 0.53±0.01a | 0.47±0.02a | 223.28±4.72a | 66.27±1.17a | 0.60±0.03a | 0.62±0.04a | 252.38±0.01a | 86.54±1.80a | 0.68±0.03a | 0.93±0.07a | ||
NA-O | 203.86±1.78b | 50.62±0.76b | 0.50±0.02ab | 0.39±0.03b | 213.92±4.09ab | 60.90±0.52b | 0.57±0.02ab | 0.54±0.02b | 242.46±3.45b | 75.57±0.63b | 0.62±0.02b | 0.74±0.04b | ||
PA-O | 193.08±0.77c | 45.10±0.69c | 0.47±0.01b | 0.33±0.02c | 207.13±0.87b | 55.93±0.85c | 0.54±0.01bc | 0.47±0.02c | 235.59±3.68b | 69.03±1.56c | 0.59±0.01b | 0.64±0.04c | ||
N21 | SO | 221.17±2.84a | 50.19±1.93b | 0.46±0.02ab | 0.36±0.04b | 231.14±3.25bc | 52.77±2.01b | 0.46±0.02bc | 0.38±0.04c | 273.59±3.59bc | 70.56±2.20c | 0.51±0.02c | 0.57±0.06c | |
A-O | 227.58±2.55a | 55.29±0.57a | 0.49±0.01a | 0.42±0.02a | 238.02±2.05ab | 62.99±1.65a | 0.53±0.02a | 0.53±0.05a | 285.78±2.33a | 88.33±0.31a | 0.62±0.01a | 0.86±0.02a | ||
NA-O | 220.87±6.30a | 48.01±2.21bc | 0.44±0.02bc | 0.33±0.04bc | 245.50±5.11a | 58.97±1.09a | 0.48±0.01b | 0.45±0.02b | 278.68±2.82ab | 80.15±1.44b | 0.58±0.01b | 0.72±0.03b | ||
PA-O | 218.30±3.84a | 44.77±0.46c | 0.41±0.01c | 0.29±0.01c | 221.93±5.28c | 50.93±1.31b | 0.45±0.01c | 0.36±0.03c | 263.88±3.66c | 68.38±0.41c | 0.50±0.01c | 0.53±0.02c |
氮素水平 N level | 分隔 方式 Barriers | 分枝期 Branching stage (Ⅰ) | 现蕾期 Budding stage (Ⅱ) | 初花期 Initial blooming stage (Ⅲ) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNN | ENN | ENN/TNN | TNW (g) | TNN | ENN | ENN/TNN | TNW (g) | TNN | ENN | ENN/TNN | TNW (g) | ||
N210 | SA | 16.67±0.67c | 4.33±0.33c | 0.24±0.01c | 4.07±0.08c | 18.00±1.00b | 6.00±0.00c | 0.34±0.01c | 5.01±0.33c | 22.00±1.15c | 10.00±0.58c | 0.45±0.01c | 9.78±0.46c |
A-O | 22.67±1.45a | 7.67±0.33a | 0.34±0.01a | 5.76±0.14a | 24.00±1.53a | 10.00±0.58a | 0.43±0.01a | 10.24±0.41a | 29.67±1.20a | 17.33±0.88a | 0.58±0.02a | 14.53±0.44a | |
NA-O | 21.33±0.88ab | 6.00±0.58b | 0.28±0.01b | 5.10±0.14b | 22.00±2.08ab | 8.33±0.88ab | 0.37±0.01b | 6.14±0.23b | 25.67±0.67b | 13.33±0.33b | 0.52±0.01b | 11.55±0.57b | |
PA-O | 18.33±1.20bc | 4.67±0.33c | 0.25±0.01c | 3.59±0.10d | 19.67±0.88ab | 6.67±0.33bc | 0.34±0.02c | 4.67±0.34c | 22.67±0.88bc | 11.00±0.58c | 0.47±0.03c | 9.37±0.27c | |
N21 | SA | 19.33±2.03a | 6.00±0.58b | 0.31±0.02c | 8.02±0.85b | 21.00±1.53b | 9.33±0.67bc | 0.43±0.01bc | 10.37±0.71b | 23.67±0.88c | 13.00±0.58c | 0.56±0.01bc | 15.7±0.63c |
A-O | 23.33±0.67a | 9.67±0.33a | 0.41±0.01a | 12.17±0.46a | 25.33±1.33a | 13.00±0.58a | 0.51±0.02a | 15.11±0.16a | 31.33±1.20a | 20.33±0.67a | 0.65±0.02a | 21.33±0.03a | |
NA-O | 22.67±2.40a | 7.67±0.88ab | 0.34±0.01b | 10.27±0.89a | 23.33±0.67ab | 11.00±0.58ab | 0.47±0.01ab | 13.46±0.69a | 27.67±1.20b | 16.67±1.20b | 0.61±0.02ab | 18.61±0.30b | |
PA-O | 19.00±1.73a | 6.00±0.58b | 0.32±0.02bc | 7.13±0.23b | 20.67±0.88b | 8.33±0.67c | 0.40±0.04c | 10.33±0.24b | 23.67±0.33c | 12.33±0.88c | 0.51±0.05c | 13.63±0.71d |
Table 3 Effect of different root partitions and N level on nodule characteristics of alfalfa
氮素水平 N level | 分隔 方式 Barriers | 分枝期 Branching stage (Ⅰ) | 现蕾期 Budding stage (Ⅱ) | 初花期 Initial blooming stage (Ⅲ) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNN | ENN | ENN/TNN | TNW (g) | TNN | ENN | ENN/TNN | TNW (g) | TNN | ENN | ENN/TNN | TNW (g) | ||
N210 | SA | 16.67±0.67c | 4.33±0.33c | 0.24±0.01c | 4.07±0.08c | 18.00±1.00b | 6.00±0.00c | 0.34±0.01c | 5.01±0.33c | 22.00±1.15c | 10.00±0.58c | 0.45±0.01c | 9.78±0.46c |
A-O | 22.67±1.45a | 7.67±0.33a | 0.34±0.01a | 5.76±0.14a | 24.00±1.53a | 10.00±0.58a | 0.43±0.01a | 10.24±0.41a | 29.67±1.20a | 17.33±0.88a | 0.58±0.02a | 14.53±0.44a | |
NA-O | 21.33±0.88ab | 6.00±0.58b | 0.28±0.01b | 5.10±0.14b | 22.00±2.08ab | 8.33±0.88ab | 0.37±0.01b | 6.14±0.23b | 25.67±0.67b | 13.33±0.33b | 0.52±0.01b | 11.55±0.57b | |
PA-O | 18.33±1.20bc | 4.67±0.33c | 0.25±0.01c | 3.59±0.10d | 19.67±0.88ab | 6.67±0.33bc | 0.34±0.02c | 4.67±0.34c | 22.67±0.88bc | 11.00±0.58c | 0.47±0.03c | 9.37±0.27c | |
N21 | SA | 19.33±2.03a | 6.00±0.58b | 0.31±0.02c | 8.02±0.85b | 21.00±1.53b | 9.33±0.67bc | 0.43±0.01bc | 10.37±0.71b | 23.67±0.88c | 13.00±0.58c | 0.56±0.01bc | 15.7±0.63c |
A-O | 23.33±0.67a | 9.67±0.33a | 0.41±0.01a | 12.17±0.46a | 25.33±1.33a | 13.00±0.58a | 0.51±0.02a | 15.11±0.16a | 31.33±1.20a | 20.33±0.67a | 0.65±0.02a | 21.33±0.03a | |
NA-O | 22.67±2.40a | 7.67±0.88ab | 0.34±0.01b | 10.27±0.89a | 23.33±0.67ab | 11.00±0.58ab | 0.47±0.01ab | 13.46±0.69a | 27.67±1.20b | 16.67±1.20b | 0.61±0.02ab | 18.61±0.30b | |
PA-O | 19.00±1.73a | 6.00±0.58b | 0.32±0.02bc | 7.13±0.23b | 20.67±0.88b | 8.33±0.67c | 0.40±0.04c | 10.33±0.24b | 23.67±0.33c | 12.33±0.88c | 0.51±0.05c | 13.63±0.71d |
1 | Zhu J Q, Werf W, Anten N P R, et al. The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to complementary light capture in plant mixtures. New Phytologist, 2015, 207(4): 1213-1222. |
2 | Corre-Hellou G, Dibet A, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, et al. The competitive ability of pea-barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122(3): 264-272. |
3 | Horwith B. A role for intercropping in modern agriculture. Bioscience, 1985, 35(5): 286-291. |
4 | Yang P, Li J, Zhang Z K, et al. Effect of nitrogen application on intercropping advantages and crop interactions under an oil flax and soybean intercrop system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(3): 181-190. |
杨萍, 李杰, 张中凯, 等. 施氮对胡麻/大豆间作体系作物间作优势及种间关系的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 181-190. | |
5 | Jiao N Y, Wang J T, Yin F, et al. Effects of ethephon and phosphate fertilizer on N absorption and intercropped advantages of maize and peanut intercropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(6): 1477-1484. |
焦念元, 汪江涛, 尹飞, 等. 施用乙烯利和磷肥对玉米/花生间作氮吸收分配及间作优势的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6): 1477-1484. | |
6 | Ahlawat A, Jain V, Nainawatee H S. Effect of low temperature and rhizospheric application of naringenin on pea-rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae symbiosis. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1998, 7(1): 35-38. |
7 | Jiao N Y, Ning T Y, Zhao C, et al. Effect of nitrogen application and planting pattern on N and P absorption and use in maize-peanut intercropping system. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008(4): 706-712. |
焦念元, 宁堂原, 赵春, 等. 施氮量和玉米-花生间作模式对氮磷吸收与利用的影响. 作物学报, 2008(4): 706-712. | |
8 | Palta J A, Fillery L R P, Rebetzke G J. Restricted-tillering wheat does not lead to greater investment in roots and early nitrogen uptake. Field Crops Research, 2007, 104(1): 52-59. |
9 | Zhao Y J, Liu X J, Tong C C, et al. Factors influencing nodulation and N fixation ability of alfalfa in a simulated alfalfa/maize intercropping system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 95-105. |
赵雅姣, 刘晓静, 童长春, 等. 紫花苜蓿/玉米间作对紫花苜蓿结瘤固氮特性的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 95-105. | |
10 | Li Y Y, Hu H S, Cheng X, et al. Effects of interspecific interactions and nitrogen fertilization rates on above-and below-growth in faba bean/mazie intercropping system. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(6): 1617-1630. |
李玉英, 胡汉升, 程序, 等. 种间互作和施氮对蚕豆/玉米间作生态系统地上部和地下部生长的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(6): 1617-1630. | |
11 | Zhu Y Q, Yu H, Zheng W, et al. Effects of different planting configurations on yield of oat and common vetch mixed plantings with soybean in alpine pastures. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 74-85. |
朱亚琼, 于辉, 郑伟, 等. 燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地混播优势的测度与影响因素分析. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 74-85. | |
12 | Liu Y C, Xiao J X, Tang L, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the naringenin exudation from intercropped faba bean’s roots in different separation patterns. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(6): 1097-1103. |
刘英超, 肖靖秀, 汤利, 等. 施氮对不同分隔方式间作蚕豆根系分泌柚皮素的影响. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(6): 1097-1103. | |
13 | Zhao X F, Pang Z G, Lv S H, et al. Effects of rapeseed and chickpea on manganese nutrition of wheat under different root barrier patterns. Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica, 2009, 24(6): 133-137. |
赵秀芬, 房增国, 吕世华, 等. 根系不同分隔方式下油菜和鹰嘴豆对小麦锰营养的影响. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(6): 133-137. | |
14 | Wang X Y, Zhang S Y, Yue X R, et al. Effects of inoculating FM and intercropping under different roots separation methods on plant growth and nitrogen utilization of maize and soybean in red soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(4): 1022-1029. |
汪新月, 张仕颖, 岳献荣, 等. 隔根与接种FM对红壤上玉米/大豆植株生长及氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4): 1022-1029. | |
15 | Zeng J X, Wen X C, Muhammad A R, et al. Effects of combined applications of nitrogen and phosphorus on interspecies interaction, yield, and dry matter accumulation and translocation in maize in a maize-soybean relay intercropping system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(7): 166-176. |
曾瑾汐, 文熙宸, Muhammad Ali Raza, 等. 氮磷配施对玉米-大豆套作模式下种间作用、玉米产量及干物质积累与转运的影响.草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 166-176. | |
16 | Song C, Mao L, Xu M, et al. Phosphorus fractions and availability of rhizosphere soil in a maize-soybean relay intercropping system. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(5): 226-230, 238. |
宋春, 毛璐, 徐敏, 等. 玉米-大豆套作体系作物根际土壤磷素形态及有效性. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(5): 226-230, 238. | |
17 | Liu Y C, Xiao J X, Zheng Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen levels and root barriers on nitrogen absorption of intercropping wheat and faba bean. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Science), 2018, 38(1): 72-78. |
刘英超, 肖靖秀, 郑毅, 等. 不同施氮水平及根系分隔方式对间作小麦蚕豆氮吸收的影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38(1): 72-78. | |
18 | Yang F, Liao D P, Wu X L, et al. Effect of aboveground and belowground interactions on the intercrop yields in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2017, 203: 16-23. |
19 | Sun L, Liu G H, Zhang X X, et al. Effects of pelletizing and adding Mongolia medicinal Scutellaria baicalensis on vitamin content and chemical composition of alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(10): 99-108. |
孙林, 刘广华, 张欣昕, 等. 蒙药黄芩与制粒对紫花苜蓿维生素和化学成分的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 99-108. | |
20 | Li J, Wang W L, Zhao X, et al. Effect of roots partitions on interspecific competition and nitrogen fixation in the pea-maize intercropping. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(6): 177-183. |
李娟, 王文丽, 赵旭, 等. 根际分隔对玉米/豌豆间作种间竞争及豌豆结瘤固氮的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(6): 177-183. | |
21 | Lin F, Liu X J, Tong C C, et al. A study of root system characteristics and carbon and nitrogen metabolism of alfalfa and four grass forages in monoculture or intercropped. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 45-54. |
蔺芳, 刘晓静, 童长春, 等. 4种间作模式下牧草根系特性及其碳、氮代谢特征研究. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 45-54. | |
22 | Zhang G G, Dong S T, Yang Z B. Production performance of alfalfa+maize intercropping systems and evaluation of interspecies competition. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(1): 22-30. |
张桂国, 董树亭, 杨在宾. 苜蓿+玉米间作系统产量表现及其种间竞争力的评定. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 22-30. | |
23 | Yang C, Wang G G, Wang M L. Oat grass production and trade in China. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(5): 1129-1135. |
杨春, 王国刚, 王明利. 我国的燕麦草生产和贸易. 草业科学, 2017, 34(5): 1129-1135. | |
24 | Wang X, Zeng Z H, Zhu B, et al. Effect of different intercropping and mixture modes on forage yield and quality of oat and common vetch. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007(11): 1892-1895. |
王旭, 曾昭海, 朱波, 等. 箭筈豌豆与燕麦不同间作混播模式对产量和品质的影响. 作物学报, 2007(11): 1892-1895. | |
25 | Zhao J H, Sun J H, Chen L Z. Productivity and interspecific competition of maize intercropped with faba bean, soybean or pea. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 86-94. |
赵建华, 孙建好, 陈亮之. 三种豆科作物与玉米间作对玉米生产力和种间竞争的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 86-94. | |
26 | Zhao Y J, Liu X J, Wu Y, et al. Rhizosphere soil nutrients, enzyme activities and microbial community characteristics in legume-cereal intercropping system in northwest china. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(3): 219-228. |
赵雅姣, 刘晓静, 吴勇, 等. 豆禾牧草间作根际土壤养分、酶活性及微生物群落特征. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(3): 219-228. | |
27 | Li L, Li X L, Zhang F S. Facilitation of wheat to phosphorus uptake by soybean in the wheat soybean intercropping. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000(4): 629-633. |
李隆, 李晓林, 张福锁. 小麦-大豆间作中小麦对大豆磷吸收的促进作用. 生态学报, 2000(4): 629-633. | |
28 | Lu R K. Analytical methods of soil agrochemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. |
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. | |
29 | Zou Q. Physiological experiment guidance. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 2006. |
邹琦. 生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. | |
30 | Wang F, Gao J W, Liu Y. Higher ammonium transamination capacity can alleviate glutamate inhibition on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) root growth under high ammonium stress. PLoS One, 2016, 11(8): e0160997. |
31 | Wang H L, Yang H J, Su F, et al. Effects of nitrogen on expression of key genes related to carbon/nitrogen metabolism and terpenoid metabolism in matruing flue-cured tobacco leaves. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2014, 20(5): 116-120. |
王红丽, 杨惠娟, 苏菲, 等. 氮用量对烤烟成熟期叶片碳氮代谢及萜类代谢相关基因表达的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(5): 116-120. | |
32 | Zeng D D, Qin R, Li M. The ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (OsFd-GOGAT) participates in leaf senescence and the nitrogen remobilization in rice. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2017, 292(2): 394. |
33 | Zhang Y T, Wang W H, Shen H, et al. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal associations on the interspecific competition between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(5): 1428-1435. |
张宇亭, 王文华, 申鸿, 等. 接种AMF对菌根植物和非菌根植物竞争的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(5): 1428-1435. | |
34 | Xiao Y B, Li L, Zhang F S. The interspecific nitrogen facilitation and the subsequent nitrogen transfer between the intercropped wheat and faba bean. Chinese Agricultural Sciences, 2005(5): 965-973. |
肖焱波, 李隆, 张福锁. 小麦/蚕豆间作体系中的种间相互作用及氮转移研究. 中国农业科学, 2005(5): 965-973. | |
35 | Tang X M, Zhong R C, Jie H K, et al. Effect of cassava-peanut intercropping on metabolites and key enzyme activity of carbon-nitrogen metabolism of peanut leaf. Southwest China Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 2014, 27(6): 2316-2321. |
唐秀梅, 钟瑞春, 揭红科, 等. 间作木薯对花生叶片碳氮代谢产物及关键酶活性的影响. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(6): 2316-2321. | |
36 | Guo F, Wan S B, Wang C B, et al. Nitrogen metabolism and relative enzyme activities of the peanut relay-cropped with wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2009, 15(2): 416-421. |
郭峰, 万书波, 王才斌, 等. 麦套花生氮素代谢及相关酶活性变化研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2): 416-421. | |
37 | Song Y X, Yang W Y, Li Z X, et al. Effect of maize-soybean relay cropping shade on nitrogen metabolism of soybean seedlings. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2010, 32(3): 390-394. |
宋艳霞, 杨文钰, 李卓玺, 等. 套作遮荫对大豆不同品种苗期氮代谢的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(3): 390-394. | |
38 | Wu Y W, Li Q, Dou P, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on leaf chlorophyll content and enzyme activity at late growth stages in maize cultivars with contrasting tolerance to low nitrogen. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(10): 188-197. |
吴雅薇, 李强, 豆攀, 等. 氮肥对不同耐低氮性玉米品种生育后期叶绿素含量和氮代谢酶活性的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(10): 188-197. | |
39 | Zhao J P, Ren J C, Guo P Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on key enzyme activities of nitrogen metabolism in wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(10): 1222-1225. |
赵吉平, 任杰成, 郭鹏燕, 等. 施氮量对小麦氮素代谢关键酶活性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(10): 1222-1225. | |
40 | Li Q, Chen J, Wu L, et al. Belowground interactions impact the soil bacterial community, soil fertility, and crop yield in maize/peanut intercropping systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(2): 622. |
41 | Sun X F, Huang L J, Wang P C, et al. Effects of different phosphorus supply levels on morphology and physiology of Paspalum wettsteinii. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 58-69. |
孙小富, 黄莉娟, 王普昶, 等. 不同供磷水平对宽叶雀稗形态及生理的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 58-69. | |
42 | Zhang Y K, Chen F J, Li L, et al. Effects of different types of maize roots on efficient phosphorus uptake and productivity in intercropping system. Chinese Science: Life Science, 2012, 42(10): 841-849. |
张义凯, 陈范骏, 李隆, 等. 不同类型的玉米根系对间作体系磷高效吸收以及生产力的影响. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2012, 42(10): 841-849. | |
43 | Li Y Y, Pang F H, Sun J H, et al. Effects of root barrier between intercropped maize and faba bean and nitrogen (N) application on the spatial distributions and morphology of crops’ roots. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2010, 15(4): 13-19. |
李玉英, 庞发虎, 孙建好, 等. 根系分隔和施氮对蚕豆/玉米间作体系根系分布和形态的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2010, 15(4): 13-19. | |
44 | Xu Q, Cheng Z H, Lu T, et al. Effects of intercropping on growth, nutrient uptake and rhizosphere environment in plants. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occcidentalia Sinica, 2010, 30(2): 350-356. |
徐强, 程智慧, 卢涛, 等. 间作对植株生长及养分吸收和根际环境的影响. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(2): 350-356. | |
45 | Liu X J, Ye F, Zhang X L. Effects of exogenous nitrogen forms on root characteristics of alfalfa at different growth stages. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(6): 53-63. |
刘晓静, 叶芳, 张晓玲. 外源氮素形态对紫花苜蓿不同生育期根系特性的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(6): 53-63. | |
46 | Liao D P, Yong T W, Liu X M, et al. Growth and nitrogen uptake of maize relay intercropped with soybean or sweet potato. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(6): 1395-1402. |
廖敦平, 雍太文, 刘小明, 等. 玉米-大豆和玉米-甘薯套作对玉米生长及氮素吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6): 1395-1402. | |
47 | Wang L B, Shao Z Q, Lu W L. Effects of nitrogen application levels and root separation on the root morphology and nitrogen fixation ability of alfalfa in the maize/alfalfa intercropping system. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 11(1): 1-13. |
王立波, 邵泽强, 陆文龙. 施氮和根系分隔对玉米/紫花苜蓿间作体系中紫花苜蓿根系形态和固氮能力的影响. 河南农业科学, 2020, 11(1): 1-13. |
[1] | Jun-nian LI, Shao-hua KANG, Dong-mei YANG, Qian HE, Shuang LI, Shuang-lun TAO. Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal with kudzu vine (Pueraria lobata) meal on serum biochemical indexes, apparent nutrient digestibility and growth performance in Boer crossbred goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 146-153. |
[2] | Wang-bin SUN, Qi FU, Rui-lin XUE, Wei-ping WANG, Qian ZHANG, Ping FENG. Effects of different levels of jujube powder on slaughter characteristics and meat quality of Northern Shaanxi white cashmere goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 111-121. |
[3] | Ying-liang YUAN, Dan TANG, Ying LU, Gui-xia RAN, Yan-qin GUO. An investigation of multiple crop planting options when following wheat with mixed-cropped forage rape and oats in the Jilin area of northeast China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 167-178. |
[4] | Gulnazar Ali, Hai-ning TAO, Zi-kui WANG, Yu-ying SHEN. Evaluating the deep-horizon soil water content and water use efficiency in the alfalfa-wheat rotation system on the dryland of Loess Plateau using APSIM [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 22-33. |
[5] | Jin LI, Shi-yong CHEN, Xu ZHAO, Hao-qi TIAN, Zhi-hua CHEN, Qing-ping ZHOU. Analysis of genetic structure and fingerprinting in oat varieties based on SCoT markers [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 72-81. |
[6] | Dan-dan ZHANG, Yuan-qing ZHANG, Jing CHENG, Guang JIN, Bo LI, Dong-cai WANG, Fang XU, Rui-feng SUN. Effects of different roughage combinations on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of Jinnan cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 93-100. |
[7] | Li-qin HUANG, Song-qiao LI, Zhen-zhong YUAN, Jing TANG, Jing-cai YAN, Qi-yuan TANG. Effects of feeding co-fermented whole plant rice and spent mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) substrate on slaughter performance, meat quality and organ size indexes of Liuyang black goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 133-140. |
[8] | Jun-hong HUO, Kang ZHAN, Qiu-sheng HUANG, Xiao-jun ZHONG, Jin-shun ZHAN, Xue-bing YAN. Effects of different concentration∶roughage ratios on growth performance, serum biochemical indices and ruminal fermentation of Nubian goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 151-161. |
[9] | Xiu-mei NIE, Ping MU, Gui-qin ZHAO, Hai-peng HE, Wen-bin WU, Dou-dou LIN, Wei-juan SU, Li-rui ZHANG. Effects of storage time on fungal and mycotoxin contamination of naked oat seeds [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 106-120. |
[10] | Zhen-feng ZANG, Jie BAI, Cong LIU, Kan-zhuo ZAN, Ming-xiu LONG, Shu-bin HE. Variety specificity of alfalfa morphological and physiological characteristics in response to drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 73-81. |
[11] | Peng GAO, Jiang-ming WEI, Yao LI, Li-hong ZHANG, Xiang ZHAO, Li-xia DU, Wei HAN. Identification of fungal diseases and factors influencing disease index in oat (Avena sativa) crops in the Datong region of Shanxi Province, China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 82-93. |
[12] | Xiao-jun SUO, Nian ZHANG, Qian-ping YANG, Hu TAO, Qi XIONG, Xiao-feng LI, Feng ZHANG, Ming-xin CHEN. Effects of peanut vine and alfalfa meal on weight gain performance, internal organ development, and blood indexes of Boer×Macheng crossbred goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 146-154. |
[13] | Zhan XIE, Lin MU, Zhi-fei ZHANG, Gui-hua CHEN, Yang LIU, Shuai GAO, Zhong-shan WEI. Effects on fermentation in alfalfa mixed silage of added lactic acid bacteria or organic acid salt combined with urea [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 165-173. |
[14] | Ji-xiang WANG, Huan-yu GONG, Xiang-jian TU, Zhen-xing GUO, Jia-nan ZHAO, Jian SHEN, Zhen-yi LI, Juan SUN. Screening of phosphite-tolerant alfalfa varieties and identification of phosphite tolerance indicators [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 186-199. |
[15] | Yi-yao HOU, Xiao LI, Rui-cai LONG, Qing-chuan YANG, Jun-mei KANG, Chang-hong GUO. Effect of overexpression of the alfalfa MsHB7 gene on drought tolerance of Arabidopsis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 170-179. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||