Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 147-157.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021436
Previous Articles Next Articles
Gui-qin ZHAO(), Ze-liang JU, Ji-kuan CHAI
Received:
2021-11-26
Revised:
2022-02-24
Online:
2022-11-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Contact:
Gui-qin ZHAO
Gui-qin ZHAO, Ze-liang JU, Ji-kuan CHAI. Effects of altitude and variety on nutrient levels and epiphytes of oats[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 147-157.
项目 Item | 月份Month | 湟中 Huangzhong | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo | 山丹 Shandan | 天祝 Tianzhu | 合作 Hezuo | 玛曲Maqu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔Altitude (m) | 2295 | 3052 | 3765 | 4217 | 2860 | 2797 | 2957 | 3474 | |
气温Temperature (℃) | 3 | -0.2 | -2.6 | -1.0 | 0.5 | -1.6 | 0.6 | -1.3 | -1.8 |
4 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | |
5 | 9.9 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 11.0 | 12.4 | 7.8 | 6.1 | |
6 | 13.1 | 10.8 | 11.2 | 11.5 | 15.2 | 16.0 | 11.1 | 9.3 | |
7 | 15.2 | 12.9 | 13.2 | 13.3 | 16.8 | 18.0 | 13.3 | 11.4 | |
8 | 14.2 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 15.3 | 17.0 | 12.5 | 10.7 | |
9 | 9.9 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 11.0 | 12.4 | 8.9 | 7.4 | |
10 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 3.6 | 2.4 | |
降水量Precipitation (mm) | 3 | 19.2 | 13.7 | 14.6 | 4.3 | 14.3 | 11.2 | 14.3 | 13.3 |
4 | 31.3 | 26.5 | 32.3 | 17.5 | 28.5 | 24.7 | 19.5 | 22.7 | |
5 | 71.1 | 70.2 | 71.0 | 47.5 | 53.8 | 47.6 | 39.8 | 41.0 | |
6 | 83.8 | 106.1 | 86.6 | 72.4 | 66.4 | 52.2 | 47.9 | 53.2 | |
7 | 108.8 | 125.2 | 105.8 | 101.7 | 88.8 | 68.6 | 61.6 | 72.6 | |
8 | 87.6 | 102.3 | 100.5 | 95.6 | 85.2 | 84.8 | 66.6 | 65.1 | |
9 | 72.3 | 88.0 | 80.0 | 72.3 | 59.0 | 45.4 | 48.8 | 49.5 | |
10 | 40.9 | 42.8 | 30.9 | 19.1 | 35.2 | 29.9 | 24.1 | 18.7 |
Table 1 Altitude and climate of each study area
项目 Item | 月份Month | 湟中 Huangzhong | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo | 山丹 Shandan | 天祝 Tianzhu | 合作 Hezuo | 玛曲Maqu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔Altitude (m) | 2295 | 3052 | 3765 | 4217 | 2860 | 2797 | 2957 | 3474 | |
气温Temperature (℃) | 3 | -0.2 | -2.6 | -1.0 | 0.5 | -1.6 | 0.6 | -1.3 | -1.8 |
4 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | |
5 | 9.9 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 11.0 | 12.4 | 7.8 | 6.1 | |
6 | 13.1 | 10.8 | 11.2 | 11.5 | 15.2 | 16.0 | 11.1 | 9.3 | |
7 | 15.2 | 12.9 | 13.2 | 13.3 | 16.8 | 18.0 | 13.3 | 11.4 | |
8 | 14.2 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 15.3 | 17.0 | 12.5 | 10.7 | |
9 | 9.9 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 11.0 | 12.4 | 8.9 | 7.4 | |
10 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 3.6 | 2.4 | |
降水量Precipitation (mm) | 3 | 19.2 | 13.7 | 14.6 | 4.3 | 14.3 | 11.2 | 14.3 | 13.3 |
4 | 31.3 | 26.5 | 32.3 | 17.5 | 28.5 | 24.7 | 19.5 | 22.7 | |
5 | 71.1 | 70.2 | 71.0 | 47.5 | 53.8 | 47.6 | 39.8 | 41.0 | |
6 | 83.8 | 106.1 | 86.6 | 72.4 | 66.4 | 52.2 | 47.9 | 53.2 | |
7 | 108.8 | 125.2 | 105.8 | 101.7 | 88.8 | 68.6 | 61.6 | 72.6 | |
8 | 87.6 | 102.3 | 100.5 | 95.6 | 85.2 | 84.8 | 66.6 | 65.1 | |
9 | 72.3 | 88.0 | 80.0 | 72.3 | 59.0 | 45.4 | 48.8 | 49.5 | |
10 | 40.9 | 42.8 | 30.9 | 19.1 | 35.2 | 29.9 | 24.1 | 18.7 |
项目 Item | 湟中 Huangzhong | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo | 山丹 Shandan | 天祝 Tianzhu | 合作 Hezuo | 玛曲 Maqu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 25.8 | 32.8 | 35.8 | 37.1 | 32.9 | 26.3 | 30.5 | 28.6 |
全氮Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
速效氮Available nitrogen (mg·kg-1) | 136.1 | 145.3 | 161.3 | 121.5 | 125.2 | 139.5 | 156.1 | 146.5 |
速效磷Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 32.2 | 20.8 | 31.5 | 27.0 | 54.1 | 34.1 | 40.0 | 33.6 |
速效钾Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | 138.5 | 164.0 | 231.3 | 136.5 | 243.6 | 146.7 | 223.4 | 210.4 |
土壤pH Soil pH | 7.8 | 7.2 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.2 |
Table 2 Soil nutrients of each test site
项目 Item | 湟中 Huangzhong | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo | 山丹 Shandan | 天祝 Tianzhu | 合作 Hezuo | 玛曲 Maqu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 25.8 | 32.8 | 35.8 | 37.1 | 32.9 | 26.3 | 30.5 | 28.6 |
全氮Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
速效氮Available nitrogen (mg·kg-1) | 136.1 | 145.3 | 161.3 | 121.5 | 125.2 | 139.5 | 156.1 | 146.5 |
速效磷Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 32.2 | 20.8 | 31.5 | 27.0 | 54.1 | 34.1 | 40.0 | 33.6 |
速效钾Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | 138.5 | 164.0 | 231.3 | 136.5 | 243.6 | 146.7 | 223.4 | 210.4 |
土壤pH Soil pH | 7.8 | 7.2 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.2 |
项目 Item | 自由度 df | 鲜草 产量 Fresh yield | 干物质 Dry matter (DM) | 水溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) | 好气性细菌 Aerobic bacteria | 霉菌 Mold | 酵母菌 Yeast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔Altitude | 7 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
品种Variety | 3 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.028 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.033 | <0.001 |
海拔×品种Altitude×variety | 21 | <0.001 | 0.984 | 0.581 | <0.001 | 0.821 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.986 | 0.983 | 0.011 |
标准误Standard error of mean (SEM) | 58.89 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.19 | 1.08 | 0.98 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
Table 3 P value of each factor under different altitudes and varieties
项目 Item | 自由度 df | 鲜草 产量 Fresh yield | 干物质 Dry matter (DM) | 水溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) | 好气性细菌 Aerobic bacteria | 霉菌 Mold | 酵母菌 Yeast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔Altitude | 7 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
品种Variety | 3 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.028 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.033 | <0.001 |
海拔×品种Altitude×variety | 21 | <0.001 | 0.984 | 0.581 | <0.001 | 0.821 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.986 | 0.983 | 0.011 |
标准误Standard error of mean (SEM) | 58.89 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.19 | 1.08 | 0.98 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
项目 Item | 品种 Variety | 湟中 Huangzhong | 天祝 Tianzhu | 山丹 Shandan | 合作 Hezuo | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛曲 Maqu | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜草产量 Fresh yield (kg·hm-2) | L3 | 17527bH | 44536bE | 70269bB | 25146cF | 54244bD | 20489bG | 64134bC | 72181bA |
L5 | 20028aH | 59255aD | 73014aB | 29812aF | 56640aE | 24228aG | 68107aC | 75605aA | |
B2 | 17368bH | 44493bE | 62375dA | 27591bF | 45994cD | 18437cG | 52905dC | 61120dB | |
B3 | 16491cG | 43657bD | 68504cA | 20400dF | 40857dE | 16974dG | 60440cC | 65325cB | |
干物质 Dry matter (g·kg-1 FM) | L3 | 347.4aA | 327.3aBC | 313.9aCD | 335.5aAB | 303.4aDE | 347.0abA | 305.5aD | 289.5aE |
L5 | 362.4aA | 341.2aBC | 331.7aCD | 351.4aAB | 319.7aDE | 354.4aAB | 317.4aDE | 306.9aE | |
B2 | 355.3aA | 333.6aBC | 322.9aCD | 351.1aAB | 312.0aDE | 339.8bABC | 309.3aDE | 298.3aE | |
B3 | 356.5aA | 343.5aB | 332.0aC | 348.3aAB | 319.4aD | 356.4aA | 312.3aDE | 304.2aE | |
水溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrate (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 170.6aBC | 179.0aB | 194.7aA | 167.4aC | 191.6abA | 164.1aC | 194.2aA | 194.0bA |
L5 | 166.5aBC | 173.7abB | 192.0aA | 161.0aCD | 198.9aA | 156.0aD | 193.0aA | 201.4aA | |
B2 | 175.8aB | 174.9abB | 201.2aA | 171.1aB | 195.4abA | 162.9aB | 195.4aA | 195.4abA | |
B3 | 163.5aB | 165.6bB | 193.3aA | 159.2aB | 185.7bA | 155.8aB | 190.4aA | 190.4bA | |
粗蛋白 Crude protein (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 116.4bA | 93.1bC | 117.7aA | 116.4bA | 85.2cD | 103.9bB | 86.3bD | 71.7bcE |
L5 | 113.5bB | 90.8bC | 118.1aA | 117.9abA | 91.2bC | 110.5aB | 90.9aC | 76.8aD | |
B2 | 119.7aA | 97.2aC | 117.1aA | 119.6aA | 98.5aC | 106.8bB | 87.0bD | 75.2abE | |
B3 | 113.5bA | 90.6bE | 107.4bB | 106.5cB | 94.4abD | 100.2cC | 81.7cF | 71.3cG | |
中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 535.8abD | 538.1abCD | 551.1abBC | 534.9aD | 557.8aB | 520.0abE | 588.6abA | 591.6abA |
L5 | 545.1aAB | 553.2aAB | 567.0aB | 544.9aAB | 546.9abAB | 533.5aB | 602.7aA | 604.2aA | |
B2 | 510.0cC | 523.0bBC | 533.1bB | 510.4bC | 522.1cBC | 494.6cD | 576.1bA | 573.0bA | |
B3 | 519.5bcBC | 521.7bBC | 535.3bB | 506.8bC | 536.4bcB | 508.4bcC | 572.8bA | 569.8bA | |
酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 316.9bCD | 341.3aA | 319.7abBCD | 330.0aABC | 303.1aD | 337.3aAB | 318.7aBCD | 303.1aD |
L5 | 341.3bA | 337.1abA | 328.2abA | 329.4aA | 302.9aB | 335.2aA | 307.2abB | 302.9aB | |
B2 | 328.7abA | 328.1abA | 312.8bB | 336.4aA | 304.4aBC | 327.2aA | 292.1bC | 304.4aBC | |
B3 | 341.4aA | 322.9bBC | 333.2aABC | 342.3aA | 316.3aC | 338.2aAB | 289.7bD | 316.3aC |
Table 4 Effects of altitudes and varieties on fresh yield and nutrient composition of oat
项目 Item | 品种 Variety | 湟中 Huangzhong | 天祝 Tianzhu | 山丹 Shandan | 合作 Hezuo | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛曲 Maqu | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜草产量 Fresh yield (kg·hm-2) | L3 | 17527bH | 44536bE | 70269bB | 25146cF | 54244bD | 20489bG | 64134bC | 72181bA |
L5 | 20028aH | 59255aD | 73014aB | 29812aF | 56640aE | 24228aG | 68107aC | 75605aA | |
B2 | 17368bH | 44493bE | 62375dA | 27591bF | 45994cD | 18437cG | 52905dC | 61120dB | |
B3 | 16491cG | 43657bD | 68504cA | 20400dF | 40857dE | 16974dG | 60440cC | 65325cB | |
干物质 Dry matter (g·kg-1 FM) | L3 | 347.4aA | 327.3aBC | 313.9aCD | 335.5aAB | 303.4aDE | 347.0abA | 305.5aD | 289.5aE |
L5 | 362.4aA | 341.2aBC | 331.7aCD | 351.4aAB | 319.7aDE | 354.4aAB | 317.4aDE | 306.9aE | |
B2 | 355.3aA | 333.6aBC | 322.9aCD | 351.1aAB | 312.0aDE | 339.8bABC | 309.3aDE | 298.3aE | |
B3 | 356.5aA | 343.5aB | 332.0aC | 348.3aAB | 319.4aD | 356.4aA | 312.3aDE | 304.2aE | |
水溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrate (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 170.6aBC | 179.0aB | 194.7aA | 167.4aC | 191.6abA | 164.1aC | 194.2aA | 194.0bA |
L5 | 166.5aBC | 173.7abB | 192.0aA | 161.0aCD | 198.9aA | 156.0aD | 193.0aA | 201.4aA | |
B2 | 175.8aB | 174.9abB | 201.2aA | 171.1aB | 195.4abA | 162.9aB | 195.4aA | 195.4abA | |
B3 | 163.5aB | 165.6bB | 193.3aA | 159.2aB | 185.7bA | 155.8aB | 190.4aA | 190.4bA | |
粗蛋白 Crude protein (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 116.4bA | 93.1bC | 117.7aA | 116.4bA | 85.2cD | 103.9bB | 86.3bD | 71.7bcE |
L5 | 113.5bB | 90.8bC | 118.1aA | 117.9abA | 91.2bC | 110.5aB | 90.9aC | 76.8aD | |
B2 | 119.7aA | 97.2aC | 117.1aA | 119.6aA | 98.5aC | 106.8bB | 87.0bD | 75.2abE | |
B3 | 113.5bA | 90.6bE | 107.4bB | 106.5cB | 94.4abD | 100.2cC | 81.7cF | 71.3cG | |
中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 535.8abD | 538.1abCD | 551.1abBC | 534.9aD | 557.8aB | 520.0abE | 588.6abA | 591.6abA |
L5 | 545.1aAB | 553.2aAB | 567.0aB | 544.9aAB | 546.9abAB | 533.5aB | 602.7aA | 604.2aA | |
B2 | 510.0cC | 523.0bBC | 533.1bB | 510.4bC | 522.1cBC | 494.6cD | 576.1bA | 573.0bA | |
B3 | 519.5bcBC | 521.7bBC | 535.3bB | 506.8bC | 536.4bcB | 508.4bcC | 572.8bA | 569.8bA | |
酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (g·kg-1 DM) | L3 | 316.9bCD | 341.3aA | 319.7abBCD | 330.0aABC | 303.1aD | 337.3aAB | 318.7aBCD | 303.1aD |
L5 | 341.3bA | 337.1abA | 328.2abA | 329.4aA | 302.9aB | 335.2aA | 307.2abB | 302.9aB | |
B2 | 328.7abA | 328.1abA | 312.8bB | 336.4aA | 304.4aBC | 327.2aA | 292.1bC | 304.4aBC | |
B3 | 341.4aA | 322.9bBC | 333.2aABC | 342.3aA | 316.3aC | 338.2aAB | 289.7bD | 316.3aC |
项目 Item | 品种 Variety | 湟中 Huangzhong | 天祝 Tianzhu | 山丹 Shandan | 合作 Hezuo | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛曲 Maqu | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria | L3 | 4.10abBC | 4.33bA | 4.20cAB | 3.97bC | 4.21cAB | 4.26bAB | 4.31cA | 4.32cA |
L5 | 3.90cA | 4.08cA | 4.30bcB | 4.04bA | 4.36bcB | 4.36bB | 4.47bcB | 4.48bcB | |
B2 | 3.97bcB | 4.17bcB | 4.55aA | 4.06bB | 4.46abA | 4.42abA | 4.60abA | 4.55abA | |
B3 | 4.21aC | 4.39aB | 4.42abB | 4.29aBC | 4.61aA | 4.59aA | 4.72aA | 4.73aA | |
好气性细菌 Aerobic bacteria | L3 | 6.60aA | 6.24abBC | 6.17bC | 6.39bAB | 6.09aC | 6.47aA | 6.50bA | 6.26aBC |
L5 | 6.59aA | 6.18bDE | 6.14bE | 6.51abAB | 6.24aCDE | 6.34aBCD | 6.42bABC | 6.27aCDE | |
B2 | 6.65aA | 6.25abBC | 6.26abBC | 6.55abAB | 6.20aC | 6.56aAB | 6.56bAB | 6.30aBC | |
B3 | 6.74aA | 6.38aB | 6.39aB | 6.74aA | 6.40aB | 6.62aAB | 6.74aA | 6.43aB | |
霉菌 Mold | L3 | 4.03abA | 3.70aB | 3.65aB | 3.66aB | 3.70aB | 3.62aB | 3.69aB | 3.69aB |
L5 | 3.89bA | 3.66aBC | 3.70aBC | 3.69aBC | 3.60aC | 3.65aBC | 3.71aBC | 3.71aB | |
B2 | 4.12aA | 3.74aB | 3.72aB | 3.81aB | 3.73aB | 3.69aB | 3.75aB | 3.72aB | |
B3 | 3.96abA | 3.65aB | 3.71aB | 3.68aB | 3.66aB | 3.68aB | 3.69aB | 3.65aB | |
酵母菌 Yeast | L3 | 5.10aA | 4.87aA | 4.47aB | 4.37abBC | 4.47aB | 4.18abCD | 4.12aD | 3.97abD |
L5 | 5.02aA | 4.89aA | 4.45aB | 4.14cCD | 4.31bBC | 4.23abCD | 4.12aD | 3.92abE | |
B2 | 5.04aA | 4.90aA | 4.32aB | 4.45aB | 4.28bB | 4.05bC | 3.94aC | 3.72bD | |
B3 | 5.24aA | 4.93aB | 4.52aC | 4.22bcE | 4.50aCD | 4.37aD | 4.14aE | 3.99aF |
Table 5 Effects of altitudes and varieties on epiphytic microorganisms of oat (lg cfu·g-1 FM)
项目 Item | 品种 Variety | 湟中 Huangzhong | 天祝 Tianzhu | 山丹 Shandan | 合作 Hezuo | 海晏 Haiyan | 玛曲 Maqu | 玛沁 Maqin | 称多 Chengduo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria | L3 | 4.10abBC | 4.33bA | 4.20cAB | 3.97bC | 4.21cAB | 4.26bAB | 4.31cA | 4.32cA |
L5 | 3.90cA | 4.08cA | 4.30bcB | 4.04bA | 4.36bcB | 4.36bB | 4.47bcB | 4.48bcB | |
B2 | 3.97bcB | 4.17bcB | 4.55aA | 4.06bB | 4.46abA | 4.42abA | 4.60abA | 4.55abA | |
B3 | 4.21aC | 4.39aB | 4.42abB | 4.29aBC | 4.61aA | 4.59aA | 4.72aA | 4.73aA | |
好气性细菌 Aerobic bacteria | L3 | 6.60aA | 6.24abBC | 6.17bC | 6.39bAB | 6.09aC | 6.47aA | 6.50bA | 6.26aBC |
L5 | 6.59aA | 6.18bDE | 6.14bE | 6.51abAB | 6.24aCDE | 6.34aBCD | 6.42bABC | 6.27aCDE | |
B2 | 6.65aA | 6.25abBC | 6.26abBC | 6.55abAB | 6.20aC | 6.56aAB | 6.56bAB | 6.30aBC | |
B3 | 6.74aA | 6.38aB | 6.39aB | 6.74aA | 6.40aB | 6.62aAB | 6.74aA | 6.43aB | |
霉菌 Mold | L3 | 4.03abA | 3.70aB | 3.65aB | 3.66aB | 3.70aB | 3.62aB | 3.69aB | 3.69aB |
L5 | 3.89bA | 3.66aBC | 3.70aBC | 3.69aBC | 3.60aC | 3.65aBC | 3.71aBC | 3.71aB | |
B2 | 4.12aA | 3.74aB | 3.72aB | 3.81aB | 3.73aB | 3.69aB | 3.75aB | 3.72aB | |
B3 | 3.96abA | 3.65aB | 3.71aB | 3.68aB | 3.66aB | 3.68aB | 3.69aB | 3.65aB | |
酵母菌 Yeast | L3 | 5.10aA | 4.87aA | 4.47aB | 4.37abBC | 4.47aB | 4.18abCD | 4.12aD | 3.97abD |
L5 | 5.02aA | 4.89aA | 4.45aB | 4.14cCD | 4.31bBC | 4.23abCD | 4.12aD | 3.92abE | |
B2 | 5.04aA | 4.90aA | 4.32aB | 4.45aB | 4.28bB | 4.05bC | 3.94aC | 3.72bD | |
B3 | 5.24aA | 4.93aB | 4.52aC | 4.22bcE | 4.50aCD | 4.37aD | 4.14aE | 3.99aF |
1 | Li P. Study on ensiling technology of siberian wildrye and oat in alpine pastoral area of Northwest Sichuan province. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016. |
李平. 改善川西北高寒牧区老芒麦和燕麦青贮发酵品质的研究. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2016. | |
2 | Yang J, Liu W H, Liang G L, et al. Traits correlated with lodging resistance of oat strains in the alpine region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 50-60. |
杨晶, 刘文辉, 梁国玲, 等. 高寒地区不同燕麦品系抗倒伏相关性状分析. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 50-60. | |
3 | Ju Z L, Zhao G Q, Chai J K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value and silage fermentation quality of different oat varieties in central Gansu Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 77-86. |
琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 不同燕麦品种在甘肃中部的营养价值及青贮发酵品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 77-86. | |
4 | Zhao G Q, Shi S L. The current situation of oat research and production, problems and strategy in Tibetan Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(11): 17-21. |
赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 青藏高原饲用燕麦研究与生产现状、存在问题与对策. 草业科学, 2004, 21(11): 17-21. | |
5 | Yang Y G, Cheng T L, Yang X J, et al. Effect of different growth stages of three oat cultivars on the nutritive value of silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(4): 683-688. |
杨云贵, 程天亮, 杨雪娇, 等. 3个燕麦品种不同收获期对青贮饲草营养价值的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4): 683-688. | |
6 | Chen L, Guo G, Yu C, et al. The effects of replacement of whole-plant corn with oat and common vetch on the fermentation quality, chemical composition and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silage in Tibet. Animal Science Journal, 2015, 86(1): 69-76. |
7 | Guo G, Yuan X, Li L, et al. Effects of fibrolytic enzymes, molasses and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality of mixed silage of corn and hulless-barely straw in the Tibetan Plateau. Grassland Science, 2014, 60(4): 240-246. |
8 | Yuan X, Wen A, Wang J, et al. Effects of ethanol, molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation quality, in vitro digestibility and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silages in the Tibetan Plateau of China. Animal Science Journal, 2016, 87(5): 681-689. |
9 | Ju Z L, Zhao G Q, Qin F C, et al. Effects of fermentation interval and additives on the quality of baled oat and common vetch mixture silage in an alpine area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(6): 148-157. |
琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 覃方锉, 等. 青贮时间及添加剂对高寒牧区燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播捆裹青贮发酵品质的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 148-157. | |
10 | Shao T, Shimojo M, Wang T, et al. Effect of additives on the fermentation quality and residual mono- and di- saccharides compositions of forage oats (Avena sativa L.) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) silages. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2005, 18(11): 1582-1588. |
11 | Ju Z L, Zhao G Q, Qin F C, et al. Effect of different moisture contents on fermentation quality of baling silage of monoculture oat and oat and common vetch mixture. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(7): 1426-1433. |
琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 覃方锉, 等. 含水量对燕麦及燕麦+箭筈豌豆裹包青贮品质的影响. 草业科学, 2016, 33(7): 1426-1433. | |
12 | Azim A, Nadeem M A, Khan A G. Effect of urea supplementation on the nutritive value of oat silage. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 1992, 5(1): 51-54. |
13 | Zhou H T. Effect of environment on the nutrient quality traits of naked oat cultivars. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2014. |
周海涛. 不同生态环境对裸燕麦籽实营养品质影响的研究. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2014. | |
14 | Buxton D R, Casler M D. Environmental and genetic effects on cell wall composition and digestibility. Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility, 1993, 1(1): 685-714. |
15 | Buxton D R. Quality-related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1996, 59(1): 37-49. |
16 | Gong Y X, Xu H, Shi H M, et al. Effects of altitude yield and quality of different oat varieties. China Cattle Science, 2019, 45(2): 9-11. |
宫玉霞, 徐海, 石红梅, 等. 海拔对不同燕麦品种产量及品质的影响. 中国牛业科学, 2019, 45(2): 9-11. | |
17 | Zhang H M. The fermentation properties of ensiled Elymus nutans from different altitude regions on the Tibetan Plateau and screening of lactic acid bacteria for low temperature fermentation. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2016. |
张红梅. 青藏高原不同海拔区垂穗披碱草发酵特性及耐低温乳酸菌筛选研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016. | |
18 | Chai J K, Zhao G Q, Shi S L. Adaptability evaluation of seven oat varieties in cool semi-humid area of Huajialing, Gansu Province. Grassland and Turf, 2011, 31(2): 1-6. |
柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 7个燕麦品种在甘肃二阴区的适应性评价. 草原与草坪, 2011, 31(2): 1-6. | |
19 | Zhao G Q, Ju Z L, Chai J K, et al. Effects of silage additives and varieties on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and nutritive value of oat silage. Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 96(8): 3151-3160. |
20 | Yang S. Feed analysis and quality testing technology. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1993. |
杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993. | |
21 | Zhou C F, Wang S P, Zhang B Z, et al. Effects of hydrothermal treatment on in vitro fermentation, methanogenesis and microbiota of soybean straw. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 171-181. |
周承福, 汪水平, 张佰忠, 等. 水热处理对黄豆秸秆体外发酵、甲烷生成及微生物的影响. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 171-181. | |
22 | Zhang H M, Jing P X, Ke W C, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tibetan Plateau on silage fermentation quality of Elymus nutans. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2015, 55(10): 1291-1297. |
张红梅, 荆佩欣, 柯文灿, 等. 青藏高原乳酸菌对垂穗披碱草青贮饲料发酵品质的影响. 微生物学报, 2015, 55(10): 1291-1297. | |
23 | Weinberg Z G, Muck R E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 1996, 19(1): 53-68. |
24 | Wang L, Sun Q Z, Zhang H J. A study on quality of mixed silage of alfalfa and corn. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(4): 202-209. |
王林, 孙启忠, 张慧杰. 苜蓿与玉米混贮质量研究. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 202-209. | |
25 | Yan Y H, Li J L, Guo X S, et al. A study on fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass and soybean straw mixed silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 94-99. |
闫艳红, 李君临, 郭旭生, 等. 多花黑麦草与大豆秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的研究. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 94-99. | |
26 | Cajarville C, Britos A, Garciarena D, et al. Temperate forages ensiled with molasses or fresh cheese whey: Effects on conservation quality, effluent losses and ruminal degradation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2012, 171(1): 14-19. |
27 | Li X L, Zhang X Y, Tang Y G, et al. Effect of concentrate-forage ratio in diet on liveweight gain of stall-fed goats. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(2): 85-91. |
李向林, 张新跃, 唐一国, 等. 日粮中精料和牧草比例对舍饲山羊增重的影响. 草业学报, 2008, 17(2): 85-91. | |
28 | Buxton D R, Muck R E, Harrison J H, et al. Preharvest plant factors affecting ensiling. Silage Science and Technology, 2003, 1(1): 199-250. |
29 | Deinum B, Beyer, Nordfeldt P H, et al. Quality of herbage at different latitudes. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1981, 29(2): 141-150. |
30 | Walgenbach R P, Marten G C, Blake G R. Release of soluble protein and nitrogen in alfalfa. I. Influence of growth temperature and soil moisture. Crop Science, 1981, 21(6): 843-849. |
31 | Deinum B, Knoppers J. The growth of maize in the cool temperate climate of the Netherlands: Effect of grain filling on production of dry matter and on chemical composition and nutritive value. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979, 27(2): 116-130. |
32 | Deinum B, Es A V, Soest P V. Climate, nitrogen and grass. 2. The influence of light intensity, temperature and nitrogen on vivo digestibility of grass and the prediction of these effects from some chemical procedures. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1968, 16(3): 217-223. |
33 | Guo H, Mao Z Q, Liu X L. Research progress of interaction between plant and microorganism. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(9): 28-33. |
国辉, 毛志泉, 刘训理. 植物与微生物互作的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9): 28-33. | |
34 | Xu D M, Zhang P, Ke W C, et al. Research process in silage microorganism and its effects on silage quality. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(3): 460-465. |
许冬梅, 张萍, 柯文灿, 等. 青贮微生物及其对青贮饲料发酵品质影响的研究进展. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 460-465. | |
35 | Shi Q P, Xu Z H, Zhang J G. Comparison of ten corn varieties as silage material in Guangzhou. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 175-182. |
施清平, 徐赵红, 张建国. 十个玉米品种在广州种植和青贮的潜力研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(3): 175-182. | |
36 | Moran J P, O’kiely P, Wilson R K. Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria on grass and the effects of added bacteria on silage fermentation. Irish Grassland & Animal Production Association Journal, 1990, 24(1): 46-55. |
37 | Muck R E, Moser L E, Pitt R E. Postharvest factors affecting ensiling. Silage Science and Technology, 2003, 1(1): 251-304. |
[1] | Ji-peng TIAN, Bei-yi LIU, Hong-ru GU, Cheng-long DING, Yun-hui CHENG, Zhu YU. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and calcium propionate on fermentation quality and mycotoxin contents of whole plant maize and oat silages [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 157-166. |
[2] | Yi-ting JIN, Wen-hui LIU, Kai-qiang LIU, Guo-ling LIANG, Zhi-feng JIA. Effect of water deficit stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No.1’ over the whole crop growth period [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 112-126. |
[3] | Dou-dou LIN, Ze-liang JU, Ji-kuan CHAI, Gui-qin ZHAO. Screening and identification of low temperature tolerant lactic acid bacterial epiphytes from oats on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 103-114. |
[4] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Min-hao CHEN, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Jie BAI, Ming SU. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and substitution with microbial fertilizer on the growth of Elymus nutans [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 53-61. |
[5] | Hai-yan WU, Ni QU, Zhen QU, Tongsangcuomu, Dawazhuoga, Deyang, Nimazhuoga, Zhao-ming LIU, Yu-shou MA. Comparison of crop yield and forage quality of six oat varieties in Angren County, Shigatse [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. |
[6] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Shu-chao HUANG, Yan-shan YANG, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Yin-cui ZHANG. Effects of combined application of microbial fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on the growth of Lolium perenne [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 136-143. |
[7] | Ji-cheng SHEN, Lei WANG, Cai-xia ZHAO, Fa-hui YE, Shi-kai LV, De-mei LIU, Rui-juan LIU, Huai-gang ZHANG, Wen-jie CHEN. Analysis of the grain related traits of 77 naked oat varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 156-167. |
[8] | Ke-tong YANG, Guo-peng CHEN, Jun-ren XIAN, Xiao-ya YU, Jin-wu ZHANG, Li WANG. Characteristics of stem and leaf functional traits of Rhododendron capitatum on the north slope of Zhagaliang, Gansu [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 111-120. |
[9] | Li-ying LIU, Yu-shan JIA, Wen-qiang FAN, Qiang YIN, Qi-ming CHENG, Zhi-jun WANG. An investigation of the main environmental factors affecting the natural drying of alfalfa for hay, and hay quality [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 121-132. |
[10] | Hai-ping LI, Hao GUAN, Zhi-feng JIA, Wen-hui LIU, Xiang MA, Yong LIU, Hui WANG, Li MA, Qing-ping ZHOU. Screening of antifreeze-thawed lactic acid bacteria and their effects on oat silage fermentation quality and aerobic stability [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(12): 158-170. |
[11] | Xing-yu WANG, Jing CHENG, Sheng GAO, Mo-han LI, Man-xia YANG, Jun-yong GE, Hai-tao ZHOU, Yun-xia LI, Hua-dong ZANG, Wen-bo ZUO. Evaluation of adaptability of naked oat varieties in the alpine region of North China based on the AMMI model and GGE Biplot [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(12): 76-84. |
[12] | Chong-yang HAN, Shuan WANG, Su-tian ZUO, San-bo YAN, Yang WANG, Jia-bang CAI, Cong-yu MA, Xin-quan ZHANG, Gang NIE. An evaluation of suitability of ten Trifolium repens varieties for use on the Chengdu Plain [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 105-117. |
[13] | Ming NAN, Jing LI, Gui-qin ZHAO, Ji-kuan CHAI, Yan-ming LIU. Relationship between lodging resistance of oats and the basal internode stem characteristics and lignin synthesis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 172-180. |
[14] | Yu-han WU, Wen-hui LIU, Kai-qiang LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG. Effects of drought stress on leaf senescence and the active oxygen scavenging system of oat seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(10): 75-86. |
[15] | Jun-nian LI, Shao-hua KANG, Dong-mei YANG, Qian HE, Shuang LI, Shuang-lun TAO. Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal with kudzu vine (Pueraria lobata) meal on serum biochemical indexes, apparent nutrient digestibility and growth performance in Boer crossbred goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 146-153. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||