Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 103-114.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021358
Dou-dou LIN(), Ze-liang JU, Ji-kuan CHAI, Gui-qin ZHAO()
Received:
2021-09-27
Revised:
2021-10-31
Online:
2022-05-20
Published:
2022-03-30
Contact:
Gui-qin ZHAO
Dou-dou LIN, Ze-liang JU, Ji-kuan CHAI, Gui-qin ZHAO. Screening and identification of low temperature tolerant lactic acid bacterial epiphytes from oats on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 103-114.
项目Item | 西宁Xining | 天祝Tianzhu | 山丹Shandan | 合作Hezuo | 海晏Haiyan | 玛曲Maqu | 果洛Guoluo | 称多Chengduo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经度Longitude | E 101°33′55″ | E 102°47′49″ | E 101°10′31″ | E 103°31′35″ | E 100°54′11″ | E 101°43′36″ | E 100°23′20″ | E 97°08′13″ |
纬度Latitude | N 36°29′51″ | N 37°11′24″ | N 38°11′45″ | N 35°35′34″ | N 36°57′29″ | N 34°04′51″ | N 34°47′44″ | N 33°48′18″ |
海拔Altitude (m) | 2295 | 2797 | 2860 | 2957 | 3052 | 3474 | 3765 | 4217 |
Table 1 Geographical information of sampling sites
项目Item | 西宁Xining | 天祝Tianzhu | 山丹Shandan | 合作Hezuo | 海晏Haiyan | 玛曲Maqu | 果洛Guoluo | 称多Chengduo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经度Longitude | E 101°33′55″ | E 102°47′49″ | E 101°10′31″ | E 103°31′35″ | E 100°54′11″ | E 101°43′36″ | E 100°23′20″ | E 97°08′13″ |
纬度Latitude | N 36°29′51″ | N 37°11′24″ | N 38°11′45″ | N 35°35′34″ | N 36°57′29″ | N 34°04′51″ | N 34°47′44″ | N 33°48′18″ |
海拔Altitude (m) | 2295 | 2797 | 2860 | 2957 | 3052 | 3474 | 3765 | 4217 |
材料来源 Material source | 发酵时间 Fermentation time (d) | 菌株名称 Strain name |
---|---|---|
西宁Xining | 3 | OCLF4, OCLF6 |
60 | OLP1 | |
天祝Tianzhu | 3 | OCEF2 |
60 | OCLB7 | |
山丹Shandan | 3 | OCPP3 |
60 | OL25 | |
合作Hezuo | 3 | OL3 |
60 | OCWC8, OCWC9 | |
海晏Haiyan | 3 | OL36 |
60 | OL8 | |
玛曲Maqu | 3 | OCLP5 |
60 | OL205 | |
果洛Guoluo | 3 | OL54 |
60 | OL194 | |
称多Chengduo | 3 | OL77 |
60 | OL122 |
Table 2 Information of lactic acid bacteria isolated from oat silage
材料来源 Material source | 发酵时间 Fermentation time (d) | 菌株名称 Strain name |
---|---|---|
西宁Xining | 3 | OCLF4, OCLF6 |
60 | OLP1 | |
天祝Tianzhu | 3 | OCEF2 |
60 | OCLB7 | |
山丹Shandan | 3 | OCPP3 |
60 | OL25 | |
合作Hezuo | 3 | OL3 |
60 | OCWC8, OCWC9 | |
海晏Haiyan | 3 | OL36 |
60 | OL8 | |
玛曲Maqu | 3 | OCLP5 |
60 | OL205 | |
果洛Guoluo | 3 | OL54 |
60 | OL194 | |
称多Chengduo | 3 | OL77 |
60 | OL122 |
特征Characteristics | OLP1 | OCEF2 | OCPP3 | OCLF4 | OCLP5 | OCLF6 | OCLB7 | OCWC8 | OCWC9 | OL3 | OL8 | OL25 | OL36 | OL54 | OL77 | OL122 | OL194 | OL205 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
形状 Shape | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus | 球菌 Coccus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus |
发酵类型Fermentation type | 异型 Hetero | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 异型 Hetero | 异型 Hetero | 异型 Hetero | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo |
革兰氏染色Gram stain | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
过氧化氢酶Catalase | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
葡萄糖产气Gas from glucose | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
NaCl | ||||||||||||||||||
3.0% | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
6.0% | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
pH | ||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
4.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
4.0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
3.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
3.0 | + | W | + | W | + | W | + | W | W | + | + | W | + | + | + | + | W | W |
温度Temperature (℃) | ||||||||||||||||||
20 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
15 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
10 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Table 3 Characteristics of 18 lactic acid bacteria strains
特征Characteristics | OLP1 | OCEF2 | OCPP3 | OCLF4 | OCLP5 | OCLF6 | OCLB7 | OCWC8 | OCWC9 | OL3 | OL8 | OL25 | OL36 | OL54 | OL77 | OL122 | OL194 | OL205 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
形状 Shape | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus | 球菌 Coccus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 杆菌 Bacillus | 球菌 Coccus |
发酵类型Fermentation type | 异型 Hetero | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 异型 Hetero | 异型 Hetero | 异型 Hetero | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo | 同型 Homo |
革兰氏染色Gram stain | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
过氧化氢酶Catalase | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
葡萄糖产气Gas from glucose | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
NaCl | ||||||||||||||||||
3.0% | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
6.0% | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
pH | ||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
4.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
4.0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
3.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
3.0 | + | W | + | W | + | W | + | W | W | + | + | W | + | + | + | + | W | W |
温度Temperature (℃) | ||||||||||||||||||
20 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
15 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
10 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
菌株 Strian | 培养时间Incubation time (h) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
OCEF2 | 5.46a | 4.42ab | 4.38ab | 4.29ab | 4.12a | 4.15a |
OCPP3 | 4.63b | 3.83c | 3.79c | 3.76c | 3.64c | 3.67c |
OCLF4 | 5.23a | 4.21b | 4.13b | 4.09b | 3.94b | 3.90b |
OCLP5 | 5.38a | 4.48a | 4.46ab | 4.43a | 4.02ab | 4.13a |
OCLF6 | 5.44a | 4.51a | 4.43ab | 4.33a | 4.04ab | 4.05ab |
OL3 | 4.52b | 3.79c | 3.70c | 3.61c | 3.64c | 3.70c |
OL8 | 4.56b | 3.82c | 3.74c | 3.71c | 3.63c | 3.61c |
OL25 | 4.59b | 3.79c | 3.72c | 3.65c | 3.64c | 3.69c |
OL36 | 4.64b | 3.93c | 3.76c | 3.72c | 3.66c | 3.69c |
OL54 | 4.57b | 3.81c | 3.77c | 3.71c | 3.60c | 3.62c |
OL77 | 4.51b | 3.74c | 3.72c | 3.64c | 3.65c | 3.62c |
OL122 | 4.52b | 3.81c | 3.76c | 3.72c | 3.68c | 3.63c |
OL194 | 5.51a | 4.56a | 4.54a | 4.47a | 4.12a | 4.12a |
OL205 | 5.32a | 4.43ab | 4.36ab | 4.29ab | 3.95b | 4.06ab |
标准误SEM | 0.026 | 0.021 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.013 | 0.012 |
Table 4 Acid production rate of tested lactic acid bacteria
菌株 Strian | 培养时间Incubation time (h) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
OCEF2 | 5.46a | 4.42ab | 4.38ab | 4.29ab | 4.12a | 4.15a |
OCPP3 | 4.63b | 3.83c | 3.79c | 3.76c | 3.64c | 3.67c |
OCLF4 | 5.23a | 4.21b | 4.13b | 4.09b | 3.94b | 3.90b |
OCLP5 | 5.38a | 4.48a | 4.46ab | 4.43a | 4.02ab | 4.13a |
OCLF6 | 5.44a | 4.51a | 4.43ab | 4.33a | 4.04ab | 4.05ab |
OL3 | 4.52b | 3.79c | 3.70c | 3.61c | 3.64c | 3.70c |
OL8 | 4.56b | 3.82c | 3.74c | 3.71c | 3.63c | 3.61c |
OL25 | 4.59b | 3.79c | 3.72c | 3.65c | 3.64c | 3.69c |
OL36 | 4.64b | 3.93c | 3.76c | 3.72c | 3.66c | 3.69c |
OL54 | 4.57b | 3.81c | 3.77c | 3.71c | 3.60c | 3.62c |
OL77 | 4.51b | 3.74c | 3.72c | 3.64c | 3.65c | 3.62c |
OL122 | 4.52b | 3.81c | 3.76c | 3.72c | 3.68c | 3.63c |
OL194 | 5.51a | 4.56a | 4.54a | 4.47a | 4.12a | 4.12a |
OL205 | 5.32a | 4.43ab | 4.36ab | 4.29ab | 3.95b | 4.06ab |
标准误SEM | 0.026 | 0.021 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.013 | 0.012 |
菌株 Strian | 培养时间Incubation time (h) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
OCEF2 | 0.84b | 1.62b | 1.76c | 1.97c | 1.98bc | 2.03c |
OCPP3 | 1.74a | 2.23a | 2.27a | 2.42a | 2.46a | 2.50a |
OCLF4 | 0.91b | 1.78b | 1.93b | 2.17b | 2.18b | 2.21b |
OCLP5 | 0.88b | 1.74b | 1.93b | 2.17b | 2.20b | 2.17b |
OCLF6 | 0.82b | 1.64b | 1.74c | 1.97c | 2.00bc | 2.02c |
OL3 | 1.68a | 2.14a | 2.25a | 2.39a | 2.41a | 2.41a |
OL8 | 1.77a | 2.14a | 2.26a | 2.39a | 2.40a | 2.37a |
OL25 | 1.72a | 2.13a | 2.24a | 2.40a | 2.45a | 2.48a |
OL36 | 1.70a | 2.20a | 2.27a | 2.44a | 2.48a | 2.52a |
OL54 | 1.70a | 2.18a | 2.29a | 2.46a | 2.50a | 2.50a |
OL77 | 1.79a | 2.21a | 2.29a | 2.49a | 2.52a | 2.53a |
OL122 | 1.71a | 2.09a | 2.17a | 2.37a | 2.42a | 2.40a |
OL194 | 0.83b | 1.60b | 1.71c | 1.94c | 1.96c | 2.01c |
OL205 | 0.86b | 1.68b | 1.83bc | 2.03bc | 2.06bc | 2.03c |
标准误SEM | 0.019 | 0.011 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.013 |
Table 5 Growth rate of tested lactic acid bacteria
菌株 Strian | 培养时间Incubation time (h) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
OCEF2 | 0.84b | 1.62b | 1.76c | 1.97c | 1.98bc | 2.03c |
OCPP3 | 1.74a | 2.23a | 2.27a | 2.42a | 2.46a | 2.50a |
OCLF4 | 0.91b | 1.78b | 1.93b | 2.17b | 2.18b | 2.21b |
OCLP5 | 0.88b | 1.74b | 1.93b | 2.17b | 2.20b | 2.17b |
OCLF6 | 0.82b | 1.64b | 1.74c | 1.97c | 2.00bc | 2.02c |
OL3 | 1.68a | 2.14a | 2.25a | 2.39a | 2.41a | 2.41a |
OL8 | 1.77a | 2.14a | 2.26a | 2.39a | 2.40a | 2.37a |
OL25 | 1.72a | 2.13a | 2.24a | 2.40a | 2.45a | 2.48a |
OL36 | 1.70a | 2.20a | 2.27a | 2.44a | 2.48a | 2.52a |
OL54 | 1.70a | 2.18a | 2.29a | 2.46a | 2.50a | 2.50a |
OL77 | 1.79a | 2.21a | 2.29a | 2.49a | 2.52a | 2.53a |
OL122 | 1.71a | 2.09a | 2.17a | 2.37a | 2.42a | 2.40a |
OL194 | 0.83b | 1.60b | 1.71c | 1.94c | 1.96c | 2.01c |
OL205 | 0.86b | 1.68b | 1.83bc | 2.03bc | 2.06bc | 2.03c |
标准误SEM | 0.019 | 0.011 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.013 |
菌株Strain | NCBI存取号NCBI access number | 近源种Relative species | 相似度Similarity (%) |
---|---|---|---|
OLP1 | MK605951 | 类谷糠乳杆菌NRIC 0677 L. parafarraginis NRIC 0677 | 99.73 |
OCEF2 | MK605952 | 屎肠球菌ATCC 19434 E. faecium ATCC 19434 | 97.94 |
OCPP3 | MK605953 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 99.59 |
OCLF4 | MK605954 | 香肠乳杆菌BCRC 14043 L. farciminis BCRC 14043 | 99.51 |
OCLP5 | MK605955 | 类食品乳杆菌DSM 13238 L. paralimentarius DSM 13238 | 98.43 |
OCLF6 | MK605956 | 香肠乳杆菌BCRC 14043 L. farciminis BCRC 14043 | 98.72 |
OCLB7 | MK605957 | 布氏乳杆菌JCM 1115 L. buchneri JCM 1115 | 99.46 |
OCWC8 | MK605958 | 食窦魏斯氏菌Ⅱ-Ⅰ-59 Weissella cibaria Ⅱ-Ⅰ-59 | 99.59 |
OCWC9 | MK605959 | 融合魏斯氏菌JCM 1093 Weissella confusa JCM 1093 | 99.73 |
OL3 | MT359240 | 植物乳杆菌JCM 1149 L. plantarum JCM 1149 | 99.72 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.66 | ||
OL8 | MT359245 | 植物乳杆菌CIP 103151 L. plantarum CIP 103151 | 99.93 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.93 | ||
OL25 | MT359246 | 植物乳杆菌CIP 103151 L. plantarum CIP 103151 | 99.59 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.59 | ||
OL36 | MT359242 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 97.99 |
OL54 | MT359241 | 植物乳杆菌JCM 1149 L. plantarum JCM 1149 | 100.00 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.93 | ||
OL77 | MT359243 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 99.72 |
OL122 | MT359247 | 植物乳杆菌NBRC 15891 L. plantarum NBRC 15891 | 99.79 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.72 | ||
OL194 | MT359248 | 植物乳杆菌NBRC 15891 L. plantarum NBRC 15891 | 99.72 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.65 | ||
OL205 | MT359244 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 97.99 |
Table 6 Analysis of 16S rDNA gene sequences of lactic acid bacteria
菌株Strain | NCBI存取号NCBI access number | 近源种Relative species | 相似度Similarity (%) |
---|---|---|---|
OLP1 | MK605951 | 类谷糠乳杆菌NRIC 0677 L. parafarraginis NRIC 0677 | 99.73 |
OCEF2 | MK605952 | 屎肠球菌ATCC 19434 E. faecium ATCC 19434 | 97.94 |
OCPP3 | MK605953 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 99.59 |
OCLF4 | MK605954 | 香肠乳杆菌BCRC 14043 L. farciminis BCRC 14043 | 99.51 |
OCLP5 | MK605955 | 类食品乳杆菌DSM 13238 L. paralimentarius DSM 13238 | 98.43 |
OCLF6 | MK605956 | 香肠乳杆菌BCRC 14043 L. farciminis BCRC 14043 | 98.72 |
OCLB7 | MK605957 | 布氏乳杆菌JCM 1115 L. buchneri JCM 1115 | 99.46 |
OCWC8 | MK605958 | 食窦魏斯氏菌Ⅱ-Ⅰ-59 Weissella cibaria Ⅱ-Ⅰ-59 | 99.59 |
OCWC9 | MK605959 | 融合魏斯氏菌JCM 1093 Weissella confusa JCM 1093 | 99.73 |
OL3 | MT359240 | 植物乳杆菌JCM 1149 L. plantarum JCM 1149 | 99.72 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.66 | ||
OL8 | MT359245 | 植物乳杆菌CIP 103151 L. plantarum CIP 103151 | 99.93 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.93 | ||
OL25 | MT359246 | 植物乳杆菌CIP 103151 L. plantarum CIP 103151 | 99.59 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.59 | ||
OL36 | MT359242 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 97.99 |
OL54 | MT359241 | 植物乳杆菌JCM 1149 L. plantarum JCM 1149 | 100.00 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.93 | ||
OL77 | MT359243 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 99.72 |
OL122 | MT359247 | 植物乳杆菌NBRC 15891 L. plantarum NBRC 15891 | 99.79 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.72 | ||
OL194 | MT359248 | 植物乳杆菌NBRC 15891 L. plantarum NBRC 15891 | 99.72 |
戊糖乳杆菌124-2 L. pentosus 124-2 | 99.65 | ||
OL205 | MT359244 | 戊糖片球菌DSM 20336 P. pentosaceus DSM 20336 | 97.99 |
特性Characteristics | OCPP3 | OL3 | OL8 | OL25 | OL36 | OL54 | OL77 | OL122 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丙三醇Glycerol | - | W | W | - | W | - | W | - |
赤藓糖醇Erythritol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D-阿拉伯糖D-arabinose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
L-阿拉伯糖L-arabinose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
核糖Ribose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-木糖D-xylose | ++ | ++ | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - |
L-木糖L-xylose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
阿东醇Adonitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
β-甲基-木糖苷β-methyl-xyloside | - | ++ | - | - | - | ++ | - | - |
半乳糖Galactose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-葡萄糖D-glucose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-果糖D-fructose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-甘露糖D-mannose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
L-山梨糖L-sorbose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
鼠李糖Rhamnose | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | - |
半乳糖醇Dulcitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
肌糖Inositol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
甘露醇Mannitol | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
山梨醇Sorbitol | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
α-甲基-D-甘露糖苷α-methyl-D-mannoside | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | ++ | ++ |
α-甲基-D-葡萄糖苷α-methyl-D-glycosidase | - | - | W | - | - | - | - | - |
N-乙酰-葡萄糖胺N-acetyl-glucosamine | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
苦杏仁苷Amygdalin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
熊果苷Arbutin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
七叶灵Esculin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
水杨苷Salicin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
纤维二糖Cellobiose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
麦芽糖Maltose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
乳糖Lactose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
蜜二糖Melibiose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
蔗糖Saccharose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
海藻糖Trehalose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
胰岛素Insulin | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | - |
松三糖Melezitose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-棉籽糖D-raffinose | ++ | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | ++ | ++ |
淀粉Starch | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
肝糖Glycogen | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
木糖醇Xylitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
β-龙胆二糖β-gentiobiose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
D-松二糖D-turanose | - | ++ | ++ | - | - | ++ | - | ++ |
D-来苏糖D-lyxose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D-塔格糖D-tagatose | ++ | ++ | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - |
D-海藻糖D-trehalose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
L-岩藻糖D-fucose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D-阿拉伯糖醇D-arabinitol | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + |
L-阿拉伯糖醇L-arabinitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
葡萄糖酸盐Gluconate | + | + | + | W | + | + | + | W |
2-酮基-葡萄糖酸盐2-keto-gluconate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
5-酮基-葡萄糖酸盐5-keto-gluconate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Table 7 Sugar fermentation profiles of 8 lactic acid bacteria strains
特性Characteristics | OCPP3 | OL3 | OL8 | OL25 | OL36 | OL54 | OL77 | OL122 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丙三醇Glycerol | - | W | W | - | W | - | W | - |
赤藓糖醇Erythritol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D-阿拉伯糖D-arabinose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
L-阿拉伯糖L-arabinose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
核糖Ribose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-木糖D-xylose | ++ | ++ | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - |
L-木糖L-xylose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
阿东醇Adonitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
β-甲基-木糖苷β-methyl-xyloside | - | ++ | - | - | - | ++ | - | - |
半乳糖Galactose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-葡萄糖D-glucose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-果糖D-fructose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-甘露糖D-mannose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
L-山梨糖L-sorbose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
鼠李糖Rhamnose | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | - |
半乳糖醇Dulcitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
肌糖Inositol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
甘露醇Mannitol | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
山梨醇Sorbitol | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
α-甲基-D-甘露糖苷α-methyl-D-mannoside | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | ++ | ++ |
α-甲基-D-葡萄糖苷α-methyl-D-glycosidase | - | - | W | - | - | - | - | - |
N-乙酰-葡萄糖胺N-acetyl-glucosamine | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
苦杏仁苷Amygdalin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
熊果苷Arbutin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
七叶灵Esculin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
水杨苷Salicin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
纤维二糖Cellobiose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
麦芽糖Maltose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
乳糖Lactose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
蜜二糖Melibiose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
蔗糖Saccharose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
海藻糖Trehalose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
胰岛素Insulin | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | - |
松三糖Melezitose | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
D-棉籽糖D-raffinose | ++ | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | ++ | ++ |
淀粉Starch | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
肝糖Glycogen | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
木糖醇Xylitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
β-龙胆二糖β-gentiobiose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
D-松二糖D-turanose | - | ++ | ++ | - | - | ++ | - | ++ |
D-来苏糖D-lyxose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D-塔格糖D-tagatose | ++ | ++ | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | - |
D-海藻糖D-trehalose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
L-岩藻糖D-fucose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D-阿拉伯糖醇D-arabinitol | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + |
L-阿拉伯糖醇L-arabinitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
葡萄糖酸盐Gluconate | + | + | + | W | + | + | + | W |
2-酮基-葡萄糖酸盐2-keto-gluconate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
5-酮基-葡萄糖酸盐5-keto-gluconate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
1 | Zhao X Q, Zhang Y S, Zhou X M. Theory and practice for sustainable development of animal husbandry on the alpine meadow pasture. Resources Science, 2000, 22(4): 50-61. |
赵新全, 张耀生, 周兴民. 高寒草甸畜牧业可持续发展: 理论与实践. 资源科学, 2000, 22(4): 50-61. | |
2 | Liu X Y, Long R J, Shang Z H. Interactive mechanism of service function of alpine rangeland ecosystems in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(24): 7688-7697. |
刘兴元, 龙瑞军, 尚占环. 青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务功能的互作机制. 生态学报, 2012, 32(24): 7688-7697. | |
3 | Liu Z H, Wu G L, Ren Q C, et al. Sustainable development of animal husbandry based on oat in alpine grassland area. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(9): 67-69. |
刘振恒, 武高林, 仁青草, 等. 发展以燕麦为支柱产业的可持续高寒草地畜牧业.草业科学, 2007, 24(9): 67-69. | |
4 | Zhang J, Guo G, Chen L, et al. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria and propionic acid on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of oats-common vetch mixed silage on the Tibetan plateau. Animal Science Journal, 2015, 86(6): 595-602. |
5 | Kung L, Shaver R D, Grant R J, et al. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(5): 4020-4033. |
6 | Romero J J, Zhao Y, Balseca-Paredes M A, et al. Laboratory silo type and inoculation effects on nutritional composition, fermentation, and bacterial and fungal communities of oat silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 100(3): 1812-1828. |
7 | Qin L P, Ke W C, Ding W R, et al. Effects of temperature on fermentation quality of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Elymus nutans silage. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 30(9): 1433-1438. |
秦丽萍, 柯文灿, 丁武蓉, 等. 温度对垂穗披碱草青贮品质的影响. 草业科学, 2013, 30(9): 1433-1438. | |
8 | Liu Q, Zhang J, Shi S, et al. The effects of wilting and storage temperatures on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of stylo silage. Animal Science Journal, 2011, 82(4): 549-553. |
9 | Zhou Y, Drouin P, Lafrenière C. Effect of temperature (5-25 ℃) on epiphytic lactic acid bacteria populations and fermentation of whole-plant corn silage. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2016, 121(3): 657-671. |
10 | Ju Z L, Zhao G Q, Qin F C, et al. Effects of fermentation interval and additives on the quality of baled oat and common vetch mixture silage in an alpine area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(6): 148-157. |
琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 覃方锉, 等. 青贮时间及添加剂对高寒牧区燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播捆裹青贮发酵品质的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 148-157. | |
11 | Santos A O, Avila C S, Schwan R F. Selection of tropical lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the quality of maize silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(12): 7777-7789. |
12 | Zhang M, Lv H, Tan Z, et al. Improving the fermentation quality of wheat straw silage stored at low temperature by psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria. Animal Science Journal, 2017, 88(2): 277-285. |
13 | Cui Z M, Guo G, Yuan X J, et al. Characterization and identification of high quality lactic acid bacteria from hulless barley straw silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(3): 607-615. |
崔棹茗, 郭刚, 原现军, 等. 青稞秸秆青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌的筛选及鉴定. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 607-615. | |
14 | Bao A A. Study on biodiversity and fermentation characteristics of lactic acid bacteria in Elymus nutans silage ensiled at different areas of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2016. |
保安安. 青藏高原不同地区垂穗披碱草青贮饲料中乳酸菌多样性及优势菌种的发酵特性研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016. | |
15 | Chen M X, Liu Q H, Zhang J G. Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolates and their inoculating effects on the silage fermentation of Italian ryegrass at low temperature. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(2): 409-415. |
陈明霞, 刘秦华, 张建国. 耐低温乳酸菌的筛选鉴定及其对黑麦草青贮的影响. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 409-415. | |
16 | Qin F C, Zhao G Q, Jiao T, et al. Study impact of different silage additives on oat silage. Grassland and Turf, 2014, 34(1): 38-43. |
覃方锉, 赵桂琴, 焦婷, 等. 不同添加剂对燕麦青贮品质的影响. 草原与草坪, 2014, 34(1): 38-43. | |
17 | Ling D W. Classification, identification and experimental methods of lactic acid bacteria. Microbiology China, 1999(1): 23. |
凌代文. 乳酸细菌分类鉴定及实验方法. 微生物学通报, 1999(1): 23. | |
18 | Zhao R R, Guo X J, Zhang S Y, et al. Screening, identification and characterization of bacillus producing lactic acid at low temperature for millet straw silage. China Feed, 2018(12): 41-45. |
赵蕊蕊, 郭晓军, 张舒月, 等. 谷草青贮用耐低温产乳酸芽孢杆菌的筛选、鉴定及性质研究. 中国饲料, 2018(12): 41-45. | |
19 | Ju Z L, Zhao G Q, Chai J K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value and silage fermentation quality of different oat varieties in central Gansu Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 77-86. |
琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 不同燕麦品种在甘肃中部的营养价值及青贮发酵品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 77-86. | |
20 | Yang X D. Study on the screening, identifying and application of low-temperature-tolerant lactic acid bacteria from forage silage in Tibet. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015. |
杨晓丹. 西藏牧草青贮饲料中耐低温乳酸菌的筛选、鉴定及验证研究. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. | |
21 | Bernardes T F, Daniel J L P, Adesogan A T, et al. Silage review: Unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(5): 4001-4019. |
22 | Muck R E, Nadeau E M G, Mcallister T A, et al. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(5): 3980-4000. |
23 | Nakamura M, Kametani I, Higaki S, et al. Identification of Propionibacterium acnes by polymerase chain reaction for amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA and lipase genes. Anaerobe, 2003, 9(1): 5-10. |
24 | Zhang H J, Yu Z, Wang L, et al. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from silage and filtering of excellent strains. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(1): 137-141. |
张慧杰, 玉柱, 王林, 等. 青贮饲料中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及优良菌株筛选. 草地学报, 2011, 19(1): 137-141. | |
25 | Wang S, Yuan X, Dong Z, et al. Isolating and evaluating lactic acid bacteria strains for effectiveness on silage quality at low temperatures on the Tibetan Plateau. Animal Science Journal, 2017, 88(11): 1722-1729. |
26 | Yuan X, Wen A, Wang J, et al. Effects of ethanol, molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation quality, in vitro digestibility and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silages in the Tibetan Plateau of China. Animal Science Journal, 2016, 87(5): 681-689. |
27 | Derzelle S, Hallet B, Ferain T, et al. Cold shock induction of the cspL gene in Lactobacillus plantarum involves transcriptional regulation. Journal of Bacteriology, 2002, 184(19): 5518-5523. |
28 | Lin X Z, He Z G, Li W X, et al. Validation of reference genes for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis in Lactobacillus plantarum R23 under sulfur dioxide stress conditions. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2018, 24(3): 390-395. |
29 | Weinberg Z, Szakacs G, Ashbell G, et al. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum, applied at ensiling, on the ensiling fermentation and aerobic stability of wheat and sorghum silages. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1999, 23(3): 218-222. |
30 | Zhang M, Wang Y, Tan Z, et al. Microorganism profile, fermentation quality and rumen digestibility in vitro of maize-stalk silages produced at different maturity stages. Crop and Pasture Science, 2017, 68(3): 225-233. |
[1] | Di ZHOU, Shuai YANG, Xin-xin ZHANG, Jing YUAN, Yan-xia GAO, Jian-guo LI, Bo WANG, Guang-sheng ZHOU, Ting-dong FU, Jun YE, Li-guo YANG, Guo-hua HUA. Effects of additive types and combinations on silage quality of whole-plant rape after harvesting and air-drying [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 124-135. |
[2] | Huan ZHANG, Yi-xiao MU, Gui-jie ZHANG. Effects of Lycium barbarum by-products on fermentation quality and microbial diversity of alfalfa silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 136-144. |
[3] | De-zhi YANG, Chen WANG, Ming-jie HOU, Hu-cheng WANG. Effects of sweet sorghum silage and whole-plant corn silage on the forestomach microecology of mutton sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 145-154. |
[4] | De-kui CHEN, Shuo WU, Xuan ZOU, Wei ZHOU, Xiao-yang CHEN, Qing ZHANG. Effect of catechol on the quality and antioxidant activity of Toona sinensis leaf silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 207-213. |
[5] | Xin-ming WU, Zhi-hong FANG, Hui-wu CHI, Hui-li JIA, Jian-ning LIU, Yong-hong SHI, Xue-min WANG. Comparison of 30 maize (Zea mays) varieties for food and feed in the Yanmenguan area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 205-216. |
[6] | Jun-nian LI, Shao-hua KANG, Dong-mei YANG, Qian HE, Shuang LI, Shuang-lun TAO. Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal with kudzu vine (Pueraria lobata) meal on serum biochemical indexes, apparent nutrient digestibility and growth performance in Boer crossbred goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 146-153. |
[7] | Yuan-yuan WEN, Mei-qi ZHANG, Tao-tao LIU, Yi-zhao SHEN, Yan-xia GAO, Qiu-feng LI, Yu-feng CAO, Jian-guo LI. Associative effects between whole crop maize silage and mixed silage made from raw potato crisp processing by-product and rice straw as determined using an in vitro gas production technique [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 154-163. |
[8] | Dong-mei YANG, Jun-nian LI, Shuang-lun TAO. Effects of tannic acid addition on the aerobic stability and mycotoxin content of kudzu vine silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 164-170. |
[9] | Xiang GUO, De-kui CHEN, Na CHEN, Yun LI, Xiao-yang CHEN, Qing ZHANG. Effect of moisture content and additives on the fermentation quality of Neolamarckia cadamba leaf silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 199-205. |
[10] | Shi-yu ZOU, Si-kui CHEN, Qi-yuan TANG, Dong CHEN, Yuan-wei CHEN, Pan DENG, Xu-lai HUANG, Fu-qiang LI. Effects of silage additives on quality and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of first season ratoon rice whole silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 122-132. |
[11] | Xiang YIN, Yong-qi WANG, Xin-qin LI, Jing TIAN, Xiao-ya WANG, Jian-guo ZHANG. Effects of various moisture-absorbing roughages on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of napier grass silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 133-138. |
[12] | Dan-dan ZHANG, Yuan-qing ZHANG, Jing CHENG, Guang JIN, Bo LI, Dong-cai WANG, Fang XU, Rui-feng SUN. Effects of different roughage combinations on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of Jinnan cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 93-100. |
[13] | Li-qin HUANG, Song-qiao LI, Zhen-zhong YUAN, Jing TANG, Jing-cai YAN, Qi-yuan TANG. Effects of feeding co-fermented whole plant rice and spent mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) substrate on slaughter performance, meat quality and organ size indexes of Liuyang black goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 133-140. |
[14] | He-xing QI, Guang-xin LU, Zong-ren LI, Cheng-ti XU, Ke-jia DE, Xiao-juan ZHOU, Ying-cheng WANG, Gui-hua MA. Identification and pathogenicity of Alternaria leaf blight strains in silage maize in Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 94-105. |
[15] | Zhan XIE, Lin MU, Zhi-fei ZHANG, Gui-hua CHEN, Yang LIU, Shuai GAO, Zhong-shan WEI. Effects on fermentation in alfalfa mixed silage of added lactic acid bacteria or organic acid salt combined with urea [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 165-173. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||