Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 85-94.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024460
Previous Articles Next Articles
Qing-yuan DENG(
), Dong-qing FU, Rong-zheng HUANG, Fan-fan ZHANG(
), Guo-jun SUN(
)
Received:2024-11-20
Revised:2025-01-16
Online:2025-10-20
Published:2025-07-11
Contact:
Fan-fan ZHANG,Guo-jun SUN
Qing-yuan DENG, Dong-qing FU, Rong-zheng HUANG, Fan-fan ZHANG, Guo-jun SUN. Effects of pine needle essential oil on the quality and aerobic stability of Broussonetia papyrifera silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(10): 85-94.
干物质 Dry matter (%FW) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%DM) | 可溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrates (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.91±0.19 | 21.48±0.14 | 8.80±0.19 | 45.69±1.71 | 27.11±0.88 |
Table 1 Nutritional composition of the raw materials for B. papyrifera
干物质 Dry matter (%FW) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%DM) | 可溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrates (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.91±0.19 | 21.48±0.14 | 8.80±0.19 | 45.69±1.71 | 27.11±0.88 |
项目 Items | 处理 Treatments | 时间 Time | SEM | P值 P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 60 d | ||||
干物质 Dry matter (%FW) | CK | 31.94aA | 31.00bB | 29.98bC | 29.58bC | 29.44bC | 0.26 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 32.12aA | 31.31abB | 30.50abC | 29.81bD | 29.57abD | 0.27 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 32.35aA | 31.59aB | 30.44abC | 30.02abC | 29.91abC | 0.27 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 32.52aA | 31.72aB | 30.89aC | 30.35aD | 30.27aD | 0.24 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.14 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.11 | - | - | |
粗蛋白 Crude protein (%DM) | CK | 21.05aA | 20.23bB | 19.38cC | 18.58cD | 18.06cE | 0.29 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 20.99aA | 20.48abB | 19.96bC | 18.94bcD | 18.58bD | 0.25 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 21.17aA | 20.65abB | 20.20abC | 19.35abD | 18.96aD | 0.22 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 21.23aA | 20.88aB | 20.49aC | 19.45aD | 19.22aD | 0.22 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.04 | 0.06 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | CK | 46.08aA | 46.62aA | 46.79aA | 46.75aA | 46.85aA | 0.28 | 0.94 |
| Ⅰ | 45.86aA | 46.39aA | 46.51aA | 46.53aA | 46.56aA | 0.30 | 0.96 | |
| Ⅱ | 45.72aA | 46.18aA | 46.37aA | 46.45aA | 46.43aA | 0.35 | 0.98 | |
| Ⅲ | 45.76aA | 46.12aA | 46.22aA | 46.26aA | 46.32aA | 0.37 | 0.99 | |
| SEM | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.32 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.96 | - | - | |
酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) | CK | 27.87aA | 28.72aA | 28.82aA | 28.88aA | 28.86aA | 0.30 | 0.85 |
| Ⅰ | 27.71aA | 28.54aA | 28.70aA | 28.77aA | 28.81aA | 0.30 | 0.81 | |
| Ⅱ | 27.62aA | 28.67aA | 28.73aA | 28.84aA | 28.93aA | 0.32 | 0.74 | |
| Ⅲ | 27.65aA | 28.67aA | 28.78aA | 28.78aA | 28.80aA | 0.28 | 0.70 | |
| SEM | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.29 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | - | - | |
可溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrates (%DM) | CK | 7.07cA | 5.10cB | 3.77cC | 3.01cD | 2.86cD | 0.42 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 7.49bA | 5.38bcB | 4.21bC | 3.53bD | 3.27bD | 0.41 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 7.73abA | 5.65abB | 4.35abC | 3.86aD | 3.64aD | 0.41 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 7.95aA | 5.87aB | 4.57aC | 4.09aD | 3.87aD | 0.40 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.12 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
Table 2 Effects of pine needle essential oil on nutrient contents of B. papyrifera silage
项目 Items | 处理 Treatments | 时间 Time | SEM | P值 P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 60 d | ||||
干物质 Dry matter (%FW) | CK | 31.94aA | 31.00bB | 29.98bC | 29.58bC | 29.44bC | 0.26 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 32.12aA | 31.31abB | 30.50abC | 29.81bD | 29.57abD | 0.27 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 32.35aA | 31.59aB | 30.44abC | 30.02abC | 29.91abC | 0.27 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 32.52aA | 31.72aB | 30.89aC | 30.35aD | 30.27aD | 0.24 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.14 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.11 | - | - | |
粗蛋白 Crude protein (%DM) | CK | 21.05aA | 20.23bB | 19.38cC | 18.58cD | 18.06cE | 0.29 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 20.99aA | 20.48abB | 19.96bC | 18.94bcD | 18.58bD | 0.25 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 21.17aA | 20.65abB | 20.20abC | 19.35abD | 18.96aD | 0.22 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 21.23aA | 20.88aB | 20.49aC | 19.45aD | 19.22aD | 0.22 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.04 | 0.06 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | CK | 46.08aA | 46.62aA | 46.79aA | 46.75aA | 46.85aA | 0.28 | 0.94 |
| Ⅰ | 45.86aA | 46.39aA | 46.51aA | 46.53aA | 46.56aA | 0.30 | 0.96 | |
| Ⅱ | 45.72aA | 46.18aA | 46.37aA | 46.45aA | 46.43aA | 0.35 | 0.98 | |
| Ⅲ | 45.76aA | 46.12aA | 46.22aA | 46.26aA | 46.32aA | 0.37 | 0.99 | |
| SEM | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.32 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.96 | - | - | |
酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) | CK | 27.87aA | 28.72aA | 28.82aA | 28.88aA | 28.86aA | 0.30 | 0.85 |
| Ⅰ | 27.71aA | 28.54aA | 28.70aA | 28.77aA | 28.81aA | 0.30 | 0.81 | |
| Ⅱ | 27.62aA | 28.67aA | 28.73aA | 28.84aA | 28.93aA | 0.32 | 0.74 | |
| Ⅲ | 27.65aA | 28.67aA | 28.78aA | 28.78aA | 28.80aA | 0.28 | 0.70 | |
| SEM | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.29 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | - | - | |
可溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrates (%DM) | CK | 7.07cA | 5.10cB | 3.77cC | 3.01cD | 2.86cD | 0.42 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 7.49bA | 5.38bcB | 4.21bC | 3.53bD | 3.27bD | 0.41 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 7.73abA | 5.65abB | 4.35abC | 3.86aD | 3.64aD | 0.41 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 7.95aA | 5.87aB | 4.57aC | 4.09aD | 3.87aD | 0.40 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.12 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
项目 Items | 处理 Treatments | 时间 Time | SEM | P值 P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 60 d | ||||
pH值 pH-value | CK | 6.75aA | 6.37aB | 5.98aC | 5.62aD | 5.45aD | 0.13 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 6.55bA | 6.04bB | 5.55bC | 5.28bD | 5.15bD | 0.14 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 6.43bcA | 5.98bB | 5.36cC | 5.02cD | 4.90cD | 0.15 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 6.38cA | 5.76cB | 5.19cC | 4.87cD | 4.72dD | 0.17 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
氨态氮/总氮 Ammonia-N/total-N (%) | CK | 2.59aE | 3.24aD | 3.68aC | 3.97aB | 4.28aA | 0.16 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 2.28bD | 2.66bC | 2.98bB | 3.24bA | 3.45bA | 0.11 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 1.95cE | 2.35cD | 2.62cC | 2.92cB | 3.19cA | 0.12 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 1.72dD | 2.08dC | 2.36dB | 2.54dA | 2.70dA | 0.10 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
乳酸 Lactic acid (%DM) | CK | 2.28cE | 2.81cD | 3.15dC | 3.52dB | 3.69dA | 0.14 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 2.77bD | 3.34bC | 3.71cB | 4.17cA | 4.25cA | 0.15 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 2.91bD | 3.86aC | 4.23bB | 4.71bA | 4.91bA | 0.19 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 3.27aD | 4.07aC | 4.62aB | 5.14aA | 5.21aA | 0.20 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.18 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
乙酸 Acetic acid (%DM) | CK | 0.43dE | 0.69dD | 0.97cC | 1.19cB | 1.27dA | 0.08 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 0.56cE | 0.84cD | 1.18bC | 1.33bB | 1.46cA | 0.09 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 0.64bE | 1.12bD | 1.54aC | 1.71aB | 1.82bA | 0.12 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.71aE | 1.27aD | 1.51aC | 1.80aB | 1.96aA | 0.12 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.30 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
丙酸 Propionic acid (%DM) | CK | 0.11aD | 0.14aC | 0.16aC | 0.19aB | 0.23aA | 0.01 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 0.07bC | 0.11bB | 0.13bB | 0.16bA | 0.18bA | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 0.07bcD | 0.10bC | 0.12bcB | 0.14bcA | 0.16bA | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.05cD | 0.08bC | 0.10cC | 0.12cB | 0.13cA | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
Table 3 Effects of pine needle essential oil on fermentation quality of B. papyrifera silage
项目 Items | 处理 Treatments | 时间 Time | SEM | P值 P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 60 d | ||||
pH值 pH-value | CK | 6.75aA | 6.37aB | 5.98aC | 5.62aD | 5.45aD | 0.13 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 6.55bA | 6.04bB | 5.55bC | 5.28bD | 5.15bD | 0.14 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 6.43bcA | 5.98bB | 5.36cC | 5.02cD | 4.90cD | 0.15 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 6.38cA | 5.76cB | 5.19cC | 4.87cD | 4.72dD | 0.17 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
氨态氮/总氮 Ammonia-N/total-N (%) | CK | 2.59aE | 3.24aD | 3.68aC | 3.97aB | 4.28aA | 0.16 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 2.28bD | 2.66bC | 2.98bB | 3.24bA | 3.45bA | 0.11 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 1.95cE | 2.35cD | 2.62cC | 2.92cB | 3.19cA | 0.12 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 1.72dD | 2.08dC | 2.36dB | 2.54dA | 2.70dA | 0.10 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
乳酸 Lactic acid (%DM) | CK | 2.28cE | 2.81cD | 3.15dC | 3.52dB | 3.69dA | 0.14 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 2.77bD | 3.34bC | 3.71cB | 4.17cA | 4.25cA | 0.15 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 2.91bD | 3.86aC | 4.23bB | 4.71bA | 4.91bA | 0.19 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 3.27aD | 4.07aC | 4.62aB | 5.14aA | 5.21aA | 0.20 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.18 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
乙酸 Acetic acid (%DM) | CK | 0.43dE | 0.69dD | 0.97cC | 1.19cB | 1.27dA | 0.08 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 0.56cE | 0.84cD | 1.18bC | 1.33bB | 1.46cA | 0.09 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 0.64bE | 1.12bD | 1.54aC | 1.71aB | 1.82bA | 0.12 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.71aE | 1.27aD | 1.51aC | 1.80aB | 1.96aA | 0.12 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.30 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
丙酸 Propionic acid (%DM) | CK | 0.11aD | 0.14aC | 0.16aC | 0.19aB | 0.23aA | 0.01 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 0.07bC | 0.11bB | 0.13bB | 0.16bA | 0.18bA | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 0.07bcD | 0.10bC | 0.12bcB | 0.14bcA | 0.16bA | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.05cD | 0.08bC | 0.10cC | 0.12cB | 0.13cA | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
项目 Items | 处理 Treatments | 时间 Time | SEM | P值 P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 60 d | ||||
乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria | CK | 6.22bD | 6.85dA | 6.75dA | 6.59cB | 6.40cC | 0.25 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 6.38bD | 7.25cA | 7.07cAB | 6.97bB | 6.68bC | 0.33 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 6.68aC | 7.49bA | 7.26bB | 7.20aB | 6.84bC | 0.32 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 6.79aC | 7.82aA | 7.66aA | 7.37aB | 7.23aB | 0.38 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
酵母菌 Yeast | CK | 5.81aA | 5.40aB | 5.11aC | 4.75aD | 4.23aE | 0.15 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 5.60aA | 4.89bB | 4.65bC | 4.36bD | 3.93bE | 0.15 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 5.15bA | 4.64bcB | 4.40cC | 3.92cD | 3.40cE | 0.16 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 5.18bA | 4.55cB | 4.34cB | 3.82cC | 3.40cD | 0.17 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.11 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
霉菌 Mold | CK | 4.99aA | 4.02aB | 3.18aC | 2.52aD | <2.00 | - | - |
| Ⅰ | 4.73bA | 3.63bB | 2.84bC | <2.00 | <2.00 | - | - | |
| Ⅱ | 4.23cA | 3.40cB | 2.64bC | <2.00 | <2.00 | - | - | |
| Ⅲ | 4.16cA | 3.40cB | 2.63bC | <2.00 | <2.00 | - | - | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.08 | - | - | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | - | - | |
好氧细菌 Aerobic bacteria | CK | 8.22aA | 7.73aB | 7.30aC | 6.81aD | 6.21aE | 0.19 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 8.07abA | 7.62abB | 7.17abC | 6.73aD | 6.08aE | 0.19 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 7.95bA | 7.46bcB | 7.04bcC | 6.48bD | 5.92bE | 0.19 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 7.98bA | 7.36cB | 6.97cC | 6.37bD | 5.89bE | 0.20 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.08 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
Table 4 Effects of pine needle essential oil on the microbial population of B. papyrifera silage (lg cfu·g-1 FW)
项目 Items | 处理 Treatments | 时间 Time | SEM | P值 P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 60 d | ||||
乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria | CK | 6.22bD | 6.85dA | 6.75dA | 6.59cB | 6.40cC | 0.25 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 6.38bD | 7.25cA | 7.07cAB | 6.97bB | 6.68bC | 0.33 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 6.68aC | 7.49bA | 7.26bB | 7.20aB | 6.84bC | 0.32 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 6.79aC | 7.82aA | 7.66aA | 7.37aB | 7.23aB | 0.38 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
酵母菌 Yeast | CK | 5.81aA | 5.40aB | 5.11aC | 4.75aD | 4.23aE | 0.15 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 5.60aA | 4.89bB | 4.65bC | 4.36bD | 3.93bE | 0.15 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 5.15bA | 4.64bcB | 4.40cC | 3.92cD | 3.40cE | 0.16 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 5.18bA | 4.55cB | 4.34cB | 3.82cC | 3.40cD | 0.17 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.11 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
霉菌 Mold | CK | 4.99aA | 4.02aB | 3.18aC | 2.52aD | <2.00 | - | - |
| Ⅰ | 4.73bA | 3.63bB | 2.84bC | <2.00 | <2.00 | - | - | |
| Ⅱ | 4.23cA | 3.40cB | 2.64bC | <2.00 | <2.00 | - | - | |
| Ⅲ | 4.16cA | 3.40cB | 2.63bC | <2.00 | <2.00 | - | - | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.08 | - | - | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | - | - | |
好氧细菌 Aerobic bacteria | CK | 8.22aA | 7.73aB | 7.30aC | 6.81aD | 6.21aE | 0.19 | <0.01 |
| Ⅰ | 8.07abA | 7.62abB | 7.17abC | 6.73aD | 6.08aE | 0.19 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅱ | 7.95bA | 7.46bcB | 7.04bcC | 6.48bD | 5.92bE | 0.19 | <0.01 | |
| Ⅲ | 7.98bA | 7.36cB | 6.97cC | 6.37bD | 5.89bE | 0.20 | <0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | - | - | |
| P值 P-value | 0.08 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | - | |
| [1] | Gong B, Tan L, Hou K, et al. Effects of hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera silage on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters of fattening dairy bulls. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(6): 3771-3779. |
| 宫斌, 檀论, 侯坤, 等. 杂交构树青贮对奶公牛生长性能、营养物质表观消化率和瘤胃发酵参数的影响. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(6): 3771-3779. | |
| [2] | Si B W, Tao H, Zhang X L, et al. Effect of Broussonetia papyrifera L. (paper mulberry) silage on dry matter intake, milk composition, antioxidant capacity and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2018, 31(8): 1259-1266. |
| [3] | Zhang S W, Wang X P, Zhang Z H, et al. Effects of Broussonetia papyrifera silage on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes and meat quality of Dorper×Hu crossbred sheep. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 89-99. |
| 张生伟, 王小平, 张展海, 等. 青贮杂交构树对杜湖杂交肉羊生长性能、血清生化指标和肉品质的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 89-99. | |
| [4] | Zhang F F, Guo X Y, Wang X Z. Production, processing, and cultivation techniques of Broussonetia papyrifera. Yanbian: Yanbian University Press, 2022. |
| 张凡凡, 郭新勇, 王旭哲. 构树的生产加工与栽培技术. 延边: 延边大学出版社, 2022. | |
| [5] | Wu C R, Dai S, Liang L F, et al. Effects of different additives on fermentation quality and protein degradation of Broussonetia papyrifera silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(10): 169-179. |
| 吴长荣, 代胜, 梁龙飞, 等. 不同添加剂对构树青贮饲料发酵品质和蛋白质降解的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(10): 169-179. | |
| [6] | Zhang Y L, Yang H J, Li C C, et al. Effects of different lactic acid bacteria treatments on nutritional quality, fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(4): 2702-2710. |
| 张玉琳, 杨寒珺, 李超程, 等. 不同乳酸菌处理对杂交构树青贮营养品质、发酵特性和有氧稳定性的影响. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(4): 2702-2710. | |
| [7] | Wang Y Z, Zhao Y Q, Wang D, et al. Progress in the study of antibacterial mechanism of plant essential oils from the perspective of multiomics. Food Science, 2024, 45(17): 348-356. |
| 王亚哲, 赵永强, 王迪, 等. 多组学视角下植物精油抑菌机理的研究进展. 食品科学, 2024, 45(17): 348-356. | |
| [8] | Sharma A, Rajendran S, Srivastava A, et al. Antifungal activities of selected essential oils against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 1322, with emphasis on Syzygium aromaticum essential oil. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2017, 123(3): 308-313. |
| [9] | Gutierrez J, Rodriguez G, Barry-Ryan C, et al. Efficacy of plant essential oils against foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria associated with ready-to-eat vegetables: antimicrobial and sensory screening. Journal of Food Protection, 2008, 71(9): 1846-1854. |
| [10] | Zuo X, Wang C, Chen X Y, et al. Effects of eucalyptus oil and rosemary oil on silage quality of stylo. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(2): 89-97. |
| 邹璇, 王成, 陈晓阳, 等. 桉叶油和迷迭香油对柱花草青贮品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(2): 89-97. | |
| [11] | Chen Y L, Li M Y, Long J H, et al. The effect of Amomum villosum essential oil on the quality of Broussonetia papyrifera silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59(6): 254-258. |
| 陈玉连, 李茂雅, 龙见华, 等. 砂仁精油对构树青贮品质的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59(6): 254-258. | |
| [12] | Hodjatpanah-Montazeri A, Mesgaran M D, Vakili A. Effect of essential oils of various plants as microbial modifier to alter corn silage fermentation and in vitro methane production. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2016, 2(6): 269-276. |
| [13] | Saab A M, Gambari R, Sacchetti G, et al. Phytochemical and pharmacological properties of essential oils from Cedrus species. Natural Product Research, 2018, 32(12): 1415-1427. |
| [14] | Sun J Z. Study on the effect of pine needle essential oil on the quality and microorganisms of alfalfa silage. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2021. |
| 孙建政. 松针精油对苜蓿青贮品质及微生物的影响研究. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2021. | |
| [15] | Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of moisture in feedstuffs, GB/T 6435-2014. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2014. |
| 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中水分的测定, GB/T 6435-2014. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014. | |
| [16] | Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of crude protein in feeds-Kjeldahl method, GB/T 6432-2018. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2018. |
| 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中粗蛋白的测定—凯氏定氮法, GB/T 6432-2018. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. | |
| [17] | Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in feeds, GB/T 20806-2022. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2022. |
| 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定, GB/T 20806-2022. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022. | |
| [18] | Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of acid detergent fiber (ADF) in feeds, NY/T 1459-2022. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2022. |
| 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定, NY/T 1459-2022. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022. | |
| [19] | Zhao J, Yin X J, Wang S R, et al. Effects of storage time on the fermentation quality, bacterial community composition, and functional profile of sweet sorghum silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 164-175. |
| 赵杰, 尹雪敬, 王思然, 等. 贮藏时间对甜高粱青贮发酵品质、微生物群落组成和功能的影响. 草业学报, 2023, 32(8): 164-175. | |
| [20] | Fu D Q, Jia C Y, Zhang L, et al. Agronomic traits and fermentation quality of maize silage harvested at different grain-development stages in irrigated drought areas of southern Xinjiang. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 111-125. |
| 付东青, 贾春英, 张力, 等. 南疆干旱灌溉区青贮玉米农艺性状和发酵品质动态分析及评价. 草业学报, 2022, 31(8): 111-125. | |
| [21] | Xu Q F, Yu Z, Han J G, et al. Determining organic acid in alfalfa silage by HPLO. Grassland and Turf, 2007(2): 63-65. |
| 许庆方, 玉柱, 韩建国, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定紫花苜蓿青贮中的有机酸. 草原与草坪, 2007(2): 63-65. | |
| [22] | Sun Y C, Chai Y X, Hou G Q, et al. Fermentation quality and in vitro rumen gas production of corn straw wheat straw mixed with whole conformation tree. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3297-3304. |
| 孙颖超, 柴雨昕, 侯国庆, 等. 2种秸秆与全株构树混贮发酵品质及瘤胃体外产气特性. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3297-3304. | |
| [23] | Guo X, Wu S, Zheng M Y, et al. Effects of addition of Neolamarckia cadamba leaves and chitosan oligosaccharides on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of sugarcane top silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 202-210. |
| 郭香, 吴硕, 郑明扬, 等. 添加黄梁木叶和壳寡糖对甘蔗梢青贮饲料发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6): 202-210. | |
| [24] | Besharati M, Palangi V, Niazifar M, et al. Effect of adding flaxseed essential oil in alfalfa ensiling process on ruminal fermentation kinetics. KSU Journal of Agricultural Nature, 2023, 26(2): 450-458. |
| [25] | Sun J Z, Wang X N, Sun G J, et al. Effect of pine needle essential oil on the main microorganisms in silage. Feed Industry, 2020, 41(18): 36-41. |
| 孙建政, 王晓娜, 孙国君, 等. 松针精油对青贮饲料中主要微生物的影响. 饲料工业, 2020, 41(18): 36-41. | |
| [26] | Cardozo P W, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, et al. Effects of natural plant extracts on ruminal protein degradation and fermentation profiles in continuous culture. Journal of Animal Science, 2004, 82(11): 3230-3236. |
| [27] | Akinci Y, Soycan-Önenc S. The effect of cumin essential oil on the fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and in vitro digestibility of vetch-oat silages. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, 2021, 58(2): 217-228. |
| [28] | Chaves A V, Baah J, Wang Y, et al. Effects of cinnamon leaf, oregano and sweet orange essential oils on fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012, 92(4): 906-915. |
| [29] | Li M, Fan X, Cheng Q, et al. Effect of Amomum villosum essential oil as an additive on the chemical composition, fermentation quality, and bacterial community of paper mulberry silage. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13(2): 1-10. |
| [30] | Besharati M, Palangi V, Niazifar M. Comparison study of flaxseed, cinnamon and lemon seed essential oils additives on quality and fermentation characteristics of lucerne silage. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 2020, 115(2): 455-462. |
| [31] | Liu X, He Y L, Hu Y Y, et al. Primary antibacterial activity and mechanism of 3-carene against the Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(3): 601-608. |
| 刘雪, 何英兰, 胡月英, 等. 3-蒈烯对铜绿假单胞菌的抑菌活性及机理初探. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(3): 601-608. | |
| [32] | He J R, Liu X, Chen W X, et al. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of (-)-β-pinene against Salmonella. Food Science, 2019, 40(1): 44-49. |
| 何静如, 刘雪, 陈文学, 等. (-)-β-蒎烯对沙门氏菌的抑菌机制. 食品科学, 2019, 40(1): 44-49. | |
| [33] | Turan A, Soycan-Önenc S. Effect of cumin essential oil usage on fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro digetibility of alfalfa silage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2018, 31(8): 1252-1258. |
| [34] | Li W, Yang M Y, Li S X. Effects of plant essential oil on fermentation quality, microbial quantity and feeding value of alfalfa. China Feed, 2021(16): 50-53. |
| 李伟, 杨敏一, 李舒心. 植物精油对苜蓿草发酵品质、微生物数量及饲用价值的影响. 中国饲料, 2021(16): 50-53. | |
| [35] | Cantoia J R, Capucho E, Garcia T M, et al. Lemongrass essential oil in sugarcane silage: fermentative profile, losses, chemical composition, and aerobic stability. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2020(260): 114371. |
| [36] | Soycan-Önenç S, Koc F, Coşkuntuna L, et al. The effect of oregano and cinnamon essential oils on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of field pea silages. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015, 28(9): 1281-1287. |
| [37] | Yang D, Wu S, Chen D D, et al. Determination of the active components of essential oil in Neolamarckia cadamba and its effect on the aerobic stabilization of whole plant corn silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2860-2867. |
| 杨丹, 吴硕, 陈丹丹, 等. 黄梁木精油活性成分测定及其对全株玉米青贮有氧稳定的影响. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2860-2867. |
| [1] | Juan-yan WU, Jing TIAN, Xiang GUO, Li-ying HUANG, Jian-guo ZHANG. Progress in research and utilization of grain silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 211-220. |
| [2] | Si-ran WANG, Cheng-long DING, Ji-peng TIAN, Yun-hui CHENG, Neng-xiang XU, Wen-jie ZHANG, Xin WANG, Bei-yi LIU. Effects of biological and antifungal additives on ensiling characteristics, in vitro digestibility, gas production, and aerobic stability of fermented total mixed ration including wet brewers’ grains [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 213-226. |
| [3] | Kai MAO, Yi XU, Xue-mei WANG, Huan CHAI, Shuai HUANG, Jian WANG, Shu-qian HUAN, Zhu YU, Mu-sen WANG. Effect of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and molasses on the fermentation quality, biogenic amines contents and bacterial community of peanut vine silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 146-158. |
| [4] | Si-ran WANG, Bei-yi LIU, Ji-peng TIAN, Yun-hui CHENG, Neng-xiang XU, Wen-jie ZHANG, Xin WANG, Cheng-long DING. Improvement in the fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass silage by ensiling with combined lactic acid bacteria inoculants at low temperature [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 159-170. |
| [5] | Yu-cheng LIANG, Xiao-wen ZHANG, Tao SHAO, Wen-bo WANG, Xian-jun YUAN. Effects of different lactic acid bacteria strains on fermentation quality and mycotoxin contents of whole-plant corn silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(3): 123-133. |
| [6] | Tian-xin GUO, Shi-shi RUAN, Xiang GUO, Jia-qi ZHAN, Qiu-yu LIANG, Xiao-yang CHEN, Wei ZHOU, Qing ZHANG. Effect of bacterial enzyme complexes on the quality of silage made from Chinese medicine crop residues [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(10): 194-202. |
| [7] | Jie ZHAO, Xue-jing YIN, Si-ran WANG, Zhi-hao DONG, Jun-feng LI, Yu-shan JIA, Tao SHAO. Effects of storage time on the fermentation quality, bacterial community composition, and functional profile of sweet sorghum silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 164-175. |
| [8] | Wen-qing LING, Lei ZHANG, Jue LI, Qi-xian FENG, Yan LI, Yi ZHOU, Yi-jia LIU, Fu-lin YANG, Jing ZHOU. Effects of Lentilactobacillus buchneri combined with different sugars on nutrient composition, fermentation quality, rumen degradation rate, and aerobic stability of alfalfa silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 122-134. |
| [9] | Hao-qian DANG, Juan-qing QIN, Yu-kang GUO, Fu ZHANG, Ying-gang WANG, Qing-hua LIU. Effects of different additives on fermentation quality of bamboo shoot shell and growth performance and rumen fermentation function of Hu Sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 135-148. |
| [10] | Meng-qi LIANG, Qi-feng WU, Tao SHAO, Ai-li WU, Qin-hua LIU. Effects of additives on the fermentation quality and α-tocopherol and β-carotene contents in Italian ryegrass silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 180-189. |
| [11] | Yuan-zhi XU, Xin-ping LIU, Li-long WANG, Hong-jiao HU, Yu-hui HE, Tong-hui ZHANG, Jia-qi JING. Processing and nutritional values of silage made from Ceratoides arborescens [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(12): 150-159. |
| [12] | Meng-jun LIU, Yue REN. Meat quality and nutritional indexes of three muscles of the F1 generation of crossbred sheep (Suffolk×river valley-type Tibetan) raised under grazing conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 140-154. |
| [13] | Juan-qing QIN, Hao-qian DANG, Hua-yun JIN, Yu-kang GUO, Fu ZHANG, Qing-hua LIU. Effects of different additives on the fermentation quality of bamboo shoot shells and on rumen microorganisms in Hu Sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 155-167. |
| [14] | Dong-qing FU, Chun-ying JIA, Li ZHANG, Fan-fan ZHANG, Chun-hui MA. Agronomic traits and fermentation quality of maize silage harvested at different grain-development stages in irrigated drought areas of southern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 111-125. |
| [15] | Ying-zheng LI, Yu-lin CHENG, Lu-lu XU, Wan-song LI, Xu YAN, Xiao-feng LI, Ru-yu HE, Yang ZHOU, Jun-jun ZHENG, Xing-yu WANG, De-long ZHANG, Ming-jun CHENG, Yun-hong XIA, Jian-mei HE, Qi-lin TANG. A comparative study of silage quality characteristics of whole-plant, whole-ear and whole-straw silage of different maize varieties (lines) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 144-156. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||