欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 38-50.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021123

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

藏北高寒草地牧草营养品质对放牧的响应机制

付刚1(), 王俊皓1,2, 李少伟1(), 何萍3   

  1. 1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,拉萨农业生态实验站,北京 100101
    2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
    3.辽宁师范大学,辽宁 大连 116021
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-29 修回日期:2021-04-22 出版日期:2021-08-30 发布日期:2021-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 李少伟
  • 作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: leesw@igsnrr.ac.cn
    付刚(1984-),男,河北保定人,副研究员,博士。E-mail: fugang@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院青年创新促进会(2020054);中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所秉维优秀青年人才基金(2018RC202);拉洛灌区粮草畜一体化关键技术研究与示范(YDZX20195400004489);国家重点研发项目(2016YFC0502005);西藏自治区饲草专项(XZ202101ZD0003N)

Responses of forage nutrient quality to grazing in the alpine grassland of Northern Tibet

Gang FU1(), Jun-hao WANG1,2, Shao-wei LI1(), Ping HE3   

  1. 1.Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station,Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
    3.Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116021,China
  • Received:2021-03-29 Revised:2021-04-22 Online:2021-08-30 Published:2021-08-30
  • Contact: Shao-wei LI

摘要:

基于藏北高原的3个围栏与自由放牧试验样地,探讨了高寒草地牧草营养品质对放牧的响应机制。结果表明:在一个高寒草原化草甸冷季牧场,冷季放牧分别减少了24.29%和18.98%的杂草酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量,并增加了41.05%的杂草粗灰分含量,从而增加了杂草营养品质;而没有改变群落和优势牧草营养品质。在一个高寒草原化草甸暖季牧场,暖季放牧分别减少了31.82%和27.45%的群落酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量,并分别增加了137.35%和24.73%的群落粗灰分和粗脂肪含量,从而增加了群落营养品质;暖季放牧分别减少了22.04%和22.50%的优势牧草酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量,并增加了202.19%的优势牧草粗灰分含量,从而增加了优势牧草营养品质;而没有改变杂草营养品质。在一个高寒草甸暖季牧场,暖季放牧分别减少了37.18%和25.10%的杂草酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量,从而增加了杂草营养品质;增加了26.55%的优势牧草粗蛋白含量,从而趋于增加了优势牧草营养品质;而对群落营养品质无影响。植物群落营养品质与植物群落α和β多样性相关,优势牧草营养品质主要与土壤变量相关,杂草营养品质与土壤变量和杂草α多样性有关。因此,藏北高寒草地牧草营养品质对放牧的响应因草地类型和放牧季节的不同而不同,高寒草地应该采取分类放牧管理。

关键词: 草地类型, 放牧季节, 分类管理, 青藏高原

Abstract:

In this study, we determined the responses of herbage nutrient quality to grazing in alpine grasslands in different seasons and different grassland types. Three fenced and free-grazing grassland sites in the alpine grassland in the Northern Tibetan Plateau were selected for this study. We found that winter grazing increased the nutritional quality of forbs by decreasing the acid detergent fiber content by 24.29% and the neutral detergent fiber content by 18.98%, and by increasing the crude ash content by 41.05%. However, winter grazing did not affect the nutritional quality of the plant community and high-quality forage in the alpine steppe meadow. Summer grazing increased the nutrient quality of the plant community by decreasing the acid detergent fiber content by 31.82% and the neutral detergent fiber content by 27.45%, and by increasing the crude ash content by 137.35% and the crude fat content by 24.73% in an alpine steppe meadow. Summer grazing increased the nutrient quality of high-quality forage by decreasing the acid detergent fiber by 22.04% and the neutral detergent fiber content by 22.50%, and by increasing the crude ash content by 202.19%. However, summer grazing did not change the nutrient quality of forbs in the alpine steppe meadow. Summer grazing increased the nutritional quality of forbs through decreasing the acid detergent fiber content by 37.18% and the neutral detergent fiber content by 25.10%, and tended to increase the nutritional quality of high-quality forage through increasing the crude protein content by 26.55%, but had no effect on the nutritional quality of plant community in an alpine meadow. The nutritional quality of the plant community was related to its α and β diversity. The nutritional quality of high-quality forage was mainly related to soil variables, and the nutritional quality of forbs was related to its α diversity and soil variables. Therefore, in alpine grasslands of Northern Tibet, the responses of forage nutrient quality to grazing differ depending on plant types and grazing seasons. Alpine grassland should be managed by different grazing patterns.

Key words: grassland type, grazing season, classified management, Tibetan Plateau