欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 155-167.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023016

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    

不同添加剂处理笋壳对其发酵品质及湖羊瘤胃微生物的影响

覃娟清(), 党浩千(), 金华云, 郭宇康, 张富, 刘庆华()   

  1. 福建农林大学动物科学学院(蜂学学院),福建 福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-06 修回日期:2023-03-27 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘庆华
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 83793089@163.com
    覃娟清(1993-),女,广西梧州人,硕士。E-mail: 2927867795@qq.com
    党浩千(1992-),男,甘肃庆阳人,硕士。E-mail: dhq66025 55@163.com第一联系人:共同第一作者These authors contributed equally to this word.
  • 基金资助:
    福建农林大学菌草科学及产业高质量发展项目(XKJC-71202103D);福建省2022年中央引导地方科技发展资金“菌草及菌物饲料开发与应用”(2022L3085)

Effects of different additives on the fermentation quality of bamboo shoot shells and on rumen microorganisms in Hu Sheep

Juan-qing QIN(), Hao-qian DANG(), Hua-yun JIN, Yu-kang GUO, Fu ZHANG, Qing-hua LIU()   

  1. College of Animal Science (College of Bee Science),Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China
  • Received:2023-01-06 Revised:2023-03-27 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-09-27
  • Contact: Qing-hua LIU

摘要:

探究不同添加剂处理笋壳对其发酵品质及湖羊瘤胃微生物的影响,采用小罐青贮的方式进行单独以及复合添加甲酸、纤维素酶、EM菌对笋壳发酵效果的影响研究,试验分为8个组:CK组(对照组)、FA组(甲酸)、CE组(纤维素酶)、EM组(EM菌)、FC组(甲酸+纤维素酶)、CM组(纤维素酶+EM菌)、FM组(甲酸+ EM菌)、FCM组(甲酸+纤维素酶+EM菌),发酵80 d后测定营养成分和发酵品质。随之筛选出较优FM、FCM组进行湖羊饲养试验,采用单因素随机试验设计,选取30只体重相近[初始体重(16.68±1.05) kg]、健康状况良好的公湖羊,将试验羊随机分为3组,每组10只。结果表明:1)FM和FCM组青贮感官评价良好,CK和CM组较差,其他各组一般。2)FA、EM、FC、FM、FCM组干物质(DM)、粗蛋白(CP)含量分别为:32.14%、32.37%、32.30%、33.96%、34.15%;9.31%、9.64%、9.80%、10.82%、11.18%;均显著高于CK组(29.34%、8.57%)(P<0.05);FCM组中性洗涤纤维(NDF,35.06%)显著低于FM组(37.48%)(P<0.05);FM、FCM组酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)分别为:27.45%、26.61%,均显著低于对照组(34.39%)(P<0.05)。3)FA、FCM组pH(3.75、3.74)显著低于FM、FC、CK组(3.94、3.86、4.15)(P<0.05);FA、EM、FC、FM、FCM组乳酸含量分别为:8.44%、8.33%、9.25%、10.83%、11.23%,均显著高于对照组(7.90%)(P<0.05),其中FM和FCM组显著高于其他组(P<0.05);FA、FC、FM、FCM组氨态氮/总氮(AN/TN)分别为:5.51、6.05、5.97、5.45,均显著低于对照组(7.24)(P<0.05)。4)FCM、FM组瘤胃乳头长度分别为:1.79、1.72 mm,显著高于CK组(1.28 mm)(P<0.05)。5)FCM、FM组 Chao1指数分别为3007.31、2897.70,均显著高于CK组(2456.21)(P<0.05)。6)CK、FCM组瘤胃球菌科相对丰度分别为:17.12%、19.12%,均低于FM组(20.98%),但无显著差异(P>0.05);FM组(6.44%)、FCM组(6.12%)BS11科相对丰度高于CK组(1.84%),但无显著差异(P>0.05)。综上所述,复合添加青贮剂发酵笋壳感官品质、发酵特性和营养品质提高,用于饲喂湖羊,能促进湖羊瘤胃形态发育,但改善瘤胃微生物组成和结构的作用不太明显。

关键词: 笋壳, 添加剂, 发酵品质, 湖羊, 瘤胃微生物

Abstract:

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effects of different additives on the fermentation quality of bamboo shoot shells, and to investigate the effects of the various silage products on rumen microorganisms of Hu Sheep. Formic acid, cellulase, and effective microorganisms were added alone or in combination and their effects on the fermentation of bamboo shoot shells in a small-tank silage system were determined. The experiment consisted of a control (CK, no additives) and seven treatment groups: The FA group (formic acid), CE group (cellulase), EM group (effective microorganisms), FC group (formic acid+cellulase), CM group (cellulase+effective microorganisms), FM group (formic acid+effective microorganisms), and FCM group (formic acid+cellulase+effective microorganisms). The nutrient composition and fermentation quality of the silage in each treatment and in CK were measured after 80 days of fermentation. On the basis of these analyses, the optimal groups, FM and FCM, were selected for a feeding experiment with Hu Sheep. In the feeding experiment, 30 healthy, disease-free male Hu Sheep with similar body weight [(16.68±1.05) kg] were selected and randomly divided into three groups, with 10 sheep per group. It was found that: 1) The sensory quality of silage was good in the FM and FCM groups, poor in CK and the CM group, and average in all the other groups. 2) The dry matter (DM) contents were 32.14%, 32.37%, 32.30%, 33.96%, and 34.15% in the FA, EM, FC, FM, and FCM groups, respectively, while the crude protein (CP) contents were 9.31%, 9.64%, 9.80%, 10.82%, and 11.18%, respectively. The DM and CP contents were significantly higher in all treatment groups than in the control (DM, 29.34%; CP, 8.57%) (P<0.05). The neutral detergent fiber content was significantly lower (P<0.05) in FCM silage (35.06%) than in FM silage (37.48%); While acid detergent fiber contents were significantly lower (P<0.05) in FM silage (27.45%) and FCM silage (26.61%) than in CK silage (34.39%). 3) The pH was significantly lower (P<0.05) in FA and FCM silages (3.75 and 3.74, respectively) than in FM, FC, and CK silages (3.94, 3.86, and 4.15, respectively). The lactate contents in FA, EM, FC, FM, and FCM silages were 8.44%, 8.33%, 9.25%, 10.83%, and 11.23%, respectively, significantly higher than in CK silage (7.90%) (P<0.05), and significantly higher in FM and FCM silages than in FA, EM, and FC silages (P<0.05). The ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen (AN/TN) levels in the FA, FC, FM, and FCM silages were 5.51, 6.05, 5.97, and 5.45, respectively, significantly lower than in CK silage (7.24) (P<0.05). 4) The average length of rumen papilla in Hu sheep fed with FCM and FM silages was 1.79 and 1.72 mm, respectively, significantly longer than that in Hu sheep fed with CK silage (1.28 mm) (P<0.05). 5) The Chao1 index value of microbial communities in the rumen of sheep fed with FCM and FM silages was 3007.31 and 2897.70, respectively, significantly higher than that of the microbial community in the rumen of sheep fed with CK silage (2456.21) (P<0.05). 6) The relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae in the rumen was lower in sheep fed with CK and FCM silages (17.12% and 19.12%, respectively) than in those fed with FM silage (20.98%), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The relative abundance of BS11 in the rumen was higher in the sheep fed with FM silage (6.44%) and FCM silage (6.12%) than in those fed with CK silage (1.84%), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). In conclusion, silages made from bamboo shoot shells differ in their sensory quality, fermentation characteristics, and nutritional quality and can promote the rumen morphological development of Hu sheep, but their effects on the composition and structure of rumen microbial communities are not obvious.

Key words: bamboo shoot shell, additive, fermentation quality, Hu Sheep, rumen microorganisms