草业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 32-44.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025331
收稿日期:2025-08-14
修回日期:2025-11-03
出版日期:2026-08-20
发布日期:2026-06-22
通讯作者:
毛培胜
作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: maops@cau.edu.cn基金资助:
Ruo-hong LI(
), Chang-ran LI, Jia-yi FU, Xin-yu HU, Pei-sheng MAO(
)
Received:2025-08-14
Revised:2025-11-03
Online:2026-08-20
Published:2026-06-22
Contact:
Pei-sheng MAO
摘要:
我国内陆盐碱地的利用成为栽培草地建设和生态修复关注的热点问题,提高盐碱胁迫条件下种子出苗率和幼苗抗逆性则是草地建设是否成功的关键。以中华羊茅种子为材料,在75 mmol·L-1混合盐溶液(NaCl和Na2SO4溶液配比为5∶1)胁迫下采用纳米铁颗粒悬浮液不同引发浓度(50、75、100和125 mg·L-1)和不同时间(10和108 h)处理,结合生物炭结壳包衣(每5 g裸种子添加0.35、0.50、1.00和1.15 g)处理,分析比较中华羊茅种子发芽、幼苗生长特性和抗氧化酶活性的变化规律,筛选确定最佳的耐盐处理方式。结果表明:1)100 mg·L-1纳米铁引发10 h能有效提高中华羊茅种子的发芽率、发芽指数和活力指数,每5 g裸种子添加0.50 g生物炭结壳包衣配方能有效提高种子的出苗率、出苗速度指数和幼苗根长,多光谱成像获取的标准化典型判别分析(nCDA)图像结果与上述种子发芽特性变化一致;两种处理均可显著提高幼苗的过氧化氢酶(CAT)、过氧化物酶(POD)、单脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶(MDHAR)、谷胱甘肽还原酶(GR)和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)活性,表明中华羊茅幼苗活性氧(ROS)清除能力增强,提高了幼苗在盐胁迫下的抗氧化能力。2)引发和包衣组合处理未产生协同效应。将最优引发、包衣处理进行组合,其对种子发芽特性和幼苗抗氧化能力提升效果并未显著优于相应单因素处理,多光谱成像也未显示幼苗活力提高;组合处理对提高中华羊茅抗盐性的效果不显著。综合分析,100 mg·L-1纳米铁引发10 h和每5 g裸种子添加0.50 g生物炭的结壳包衣均能有效提升中华羊茅在盐胁迫下的种子萌发与幼苗活力,但二者组合处理未表现出协同增效作用。
李若鸿, 李长然, 傅佳怡, 胡新雨, 毛培胜. 纳米铁引发和生物炭结壳包衣对中华羊茅种子萌发和幼苗生长耐盐性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(8): 32-44.
Ruo-hong LI, Chang-ran LI, Jia-yi FU, Xin-yu HU, Pei-sheng MAO. Effects of nano-iron priming and biochar encrusting on the salt tolerance of Festuca sinensis at the seed germination and seedling growth stages[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(8): 32-44.
图1 纳米铁引发对盐胁迫下中华羊茅种子发芽特性的影响不同小写字母表示同一引发时间不同引发浓度间在0.05水平上差异显著,*表示相同引发浓度下不同引发时间在0.05水平上差异显著。Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level among different priming concentrations with the same priming time, and * indicates significant difference at the 0.05 level between different priming times under the same priming concentration.
Fig.1 Effect of nano-iron priming on the germination characteristics of F. sinensis seeds under salt stress
图2 生物炭结壳包衣对盐胁迫下中华羊茅种子发芽特性的影响不同小写字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著,下同。Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level, the same below.
Fig.2 Effect of biochar encrusting on the germination characteristics of F. sinensis seeds under salt stress
图3 盐胁迫下纳米铁引发处理中华羊茅幼苗的多光谱成像及对酶促清除系统的影响nCDA图像中,蓝色越深代表幼苗活力越高,红色越深代表幼苗活力越低,下同In nCDA images, deeper shades of blue indicate higher seedling vigour, while deeper shades of red indicate lower seedling vigour, the same below.
Fig.3 Multispectral imaging of F. sinensis seedlings coated with nano-iron under salt stress and its effects on antioxidant enzyme system
图4 盐胁迫下生物炭结壳包衣处理中华羊茅幼苗的多光谱成像及对酶促清除系统的影响
Fig.4 Multispectral imaging of F. sinensis seedlings coated with biochar crusts under salt stress and its effects on antioxidant enzyme system
图5 盐胁迫下纳米铁引发与生物炭结壳包衣组合对中华羊茅种子发芽特性的影响Fe-BC: 100 mg·L-1纳米铁引发10 h与每5 g裸种子添加0.50 g生物炭的结壳包衣组合处理The F. sinensis seeds treated with a combination of 100 mg·L-1 nano-iron primed for 10 hours and 0.50 g of biochar added to every 5 g of bare seeds for encrusting.
Fig.5 Effect of nano-iron priming and biochar encrusting combination on the germination characteristics of F. sinensis seeds under salt stress
图6 盐胁迫下纳米铁引发与生物炭结壳包衣组合中华羊茅幼苗的多光谱成像及对酶促清除系统的影响
Fig.6 Multispectral imaging of F. sinensis seedlings and their effects on antioxidant enzyme system under salt stress using the combined treatment of nano-iron priming and biochar encrusting
| [1] | Wang G Z, Ni G, Feng G, et al. Saline-alkali soil reclamation and utilization in China: Progress and prospects. Frontiers of Agricultural Science & Engineering, 2024, 11(2): 216-228. |
| [2] | Tian P, Kuang Y, Nan Z B. The characteristics of Festuca sinensis and its breeding potential. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(7): 1079-1087. |
| 田沛, 旷宇, 南志标. 中华羊茅的优良特性以及利用内生真菌进行育种潜力浅析. 草业科学, 2015, 32(7): 1079-1087. | |
| [3] | Farooq M, Gogoi N, Hussain M, et al. Effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of salt stress in grain legumes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017, 118: 199-217. |
| [4] | Liu L, Zhang Y Q, Wang J, et al. Comparison of salt tolerance during the germination period of 12 grass species under severe salt stress. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(11): 2806-2819. |
| 刘璐, 张跃群, 王婧, 等. 重度盐胁迫下12个地被草种萌发期的耐盐性比较. 草业科学, 2019, 36(11): 2806-2819. | |
| [5] | Gao M, Lin W H, Tian P. Effects of sodium stress on seed germination of Festuca sinensis. Seed, 2021, 40(5): 20-26, 32. |
| 高敏, 蔺伟虎, 田沛. 钠盐胁迫对中华羊茅种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2021, 40(5): 20-26, 32. | |
| [6] | Leonard S M, Xin H, Brown-brandl T M, et al. Effects of farrowing stall layout and number of heat lamps on sow and piglet production performance. Animals, 2020, 10(2): 348. |
| [7] | Ghafari H, Razmjoo J. Effect of foliar application of nano-iron oxidase, iron chelate and iron sulphate rates on yield and quality of wheat. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 2013, 4(11): 2997-3003. |
| [8] | Wang Y H, Tang L, Liu G Y, et al. Effect of nanomaterials on plant growth and development. Agriculture of Jilin, 2017(5): 62. |
| 王钰涵, 唐乐, 刘桂芸, 等. 纳米材料对植物生长发育的影响. 吉林农业, 2017(5): 62. | |
| [9] | Sun Y F. Effects of nanopriming with iron oxide (Ⅲ) on seed germination and drought resistance of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Xianyang: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2022.孙运府. 纳米铁引发对柳枝稷种子萌发特性及抗旱性的影响. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2022. |
| [10] | Maswada H F, Djanaguiraman M, Prasad P V V. Seed treatment with nano-iron (Ⅲ) oxide enhances germination, seeding growth and salinity tolerance of sorghum. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2018, 204(6): 577-587. |
| [11] | Li Y C, Mo H F, Wang T, et al. Study on the response of red clover seeds to iron nanoparticles. Agriculture and Technology, 2023, 43(6): 1-5. |
| 李羽超, 莫海凤, 王田, 等. 红三叶种子对纳米铁的响应研究. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(6): 1-5. | |
| [12] | Li Y. Research progress of biochar preparation and performance. Hans Journal of Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2020, 10(5): 384-388. |
| 李燕. 生物炭制备及其性能研究进展. 化学工程与技术, 2020, 10(5): 384-388. | |
| [13] | Beesley L, Moreno-jiménez E, Gomez-eyles J L, et al. A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(12): 3269-3282. |
| [14] | Zhang K K, Khan Z, Yu Q, et al. Biochar coating is a sustainable and economical approach to promote seed coating technology, seed germination, plant performance, and soil health. Plants, 2022, 11(21): 2864. |
| [15] | Elamparithi R, Sujatha K, Menaka C, et al. Impact of organic seaweed pelleting on seed quality and biochemical parameters in brinjal seeds. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 2021, 10(11): 1466-1469. |
| [16] | Dong J, Fu P P, Pan G X, et al. A novel agricultural seed coating agent prepared from biomass charcoal derived from agricultural waste and its preparation method: CN103053244A. 2014-12-10. |
| 董娟, 付潘潘, 潘根兴, 等. 一种利用农业废弃物新型生物质炭制备的农作物种子包衣剂及其制备方法: CN103053244A. 2014-12-10. | |
| [17] | Zhang K K, Khan Z, Liu J H, et al. Germination and growth performance of water-saving and drought-resistant rice enhanced by seed treatment with wood vinegar and biochar under dry direct-seeded system. Agronomy, 2022, 12(5): 1223. |
| [18] | Liu J Y. Study and evaluation on drought-resistant biochar encrusting technology of three grasses species. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2024.刘婧禹. 三种禾草生物炭抗旱壳衣技术研究与评价. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2024. |
| [19] | International Seed Testing Association. International rules for seed testing. Wallisellen: The International Seed Testing Association, 2023. |
| [20] | State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Lanzhou University. Rules of seed testing for forage, turfgrass and other herbaceous plant-The germination test: GB/T 2930.4-2017. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017.兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室. 草种子检验规程 发芽试验: GB/T 2930.4-2017. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. |
| [21] | Shrestha S, Deleuran L C, Olesen M H, et al. Use of multispectral imaging in varietal identification of tomato. Sensors, 2015, 15(2): 4496-4512. |
| [22] | Cakmak I, Marschner H. Magnesium-deficiency and high light-intensity enhance activities of superoxide-dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione-reductase in bean-leaves. Plant Physiology, 1992, 98(4): 1222-1227. |
| [23] | Kar M, Mishra D. Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenoloxidase activities during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiology, 1976, 57(2): 315-319. |
| [24] | Charles B, Irwin F. Superoxide dismutase-improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 1971, 44(1): 276. |
| [25] | Arrigoni O, Dipierro S, Borraccino G. Ascorbate free-radical reductase, a key enzyme of the ascorbic-acid system. Febs Letters, 1981, 125(2): 242-244. |
| [26] | Hossain Z, López-Climent M F, Arbona V, et al. Modulation of the antioxidant system in citrus under waterlogging and subsequent drainage. Plant Physiology, 2009, 166(13): 1391-1404. |
| [27] | Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen-peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach-chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1981, 22(5): 867-880. |
| [28] | Zhang M X, Zhao L Y, He Y Y, et al. Potential roles of iron nanomaterials in enhancing growth and nitrogen fixation and modulating rhizomicrobiome in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Bioresource Technology, 2024, 391(Pt B): 129987. |
| [29] | Xu S, Wu Y X, Li H Z, et al. Mechanisms of doped nanoceria seed priming enhanced cold tolerance in rapeseed. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1347.s.20250625.1017.002 |
| 续绅, 吴懿鑫, 李宏卓, 等. 掺杂氧化铈纳米颗粒介导的种子引发提升油菜耐寒性机理. 农业环境科学学报, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1347.s.20250625.1017.002 | |
| [30] | Yu Y. Research on nano-priming and film coating technology of oat seeds resistant to UV-B stress. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2024. 于洋. 基于纳米引发的耐UV-B型燕麦种子包膜技术研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2024. |
| [31] | Lee W, An Y, Yoon H, et al. Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): Plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2008, 27(9): 1915-1921. |
| [32] | Godlewska P, Ok Y S, Oleszczuk P, et al. Ecotoxicological aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403: 123833. |
| [33] | Wang Y F. Chitosan-modified biochar promotes seed germination and seedling growth of wheat under salt stress. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023, 21(19): 6493-6499. |
| 王乙富. 壳聚糖改性生物炭促进盐胁迫下小麦种子萌发和幼苗生长. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(19): 6493-6499. | |
| [34] | Li C R, Liu J Y, Li R H, et al. Effects of biochar encrusting on drought resistance characteristics of Agropyron mongolicum during seed germination. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(3): 960-967. |
| 李长然, 刘婧禹, 李若鸿, 等. 生物炭结壳包衣对蒙古冰草萌发期抗旱特性的影响. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 960-967. | |
| [35] | Ji L H, He A L, He F, et al. Screening of alfalfa seed coating materials and theirs effect on seed germination. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(8): 2728-2736. |
| 吉凌鹤, 何傲蕾, 何峰, 等. 紫花苜蓿种子包衣材料筛选及其对种子萌发影响. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2728-2736. | |
| [36] | Chen C, Yang K B. Effects of salt stress on plant growth and development. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20250401.1657.006 |
| 陈晨, 杨凯波. 盐胁迫对植物生长发育的影响. 分子植物育种, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20250401.1657.006 | |
| [37] | Mazhar M W, Ishtiaq M, Maqbool M, et al. Seed priming with calcium oxide nanoparticles improves germination, biomass, antioxidant defence and yield traits of canola plants under drought stress. South African Journal of Botany, 2022, 151: 889-899. |
| [38] | Hernández-hernández H, González-morales S, Benavides-mendoza A, et al. Effects of chitosan-PVA and Cu nanoparticles on the growth and antioxidant capacity of tomato under saline stress. Molecules, 2018, 23(1): 178. |
| [39] | Ullah I, Toor M D, Basit A, et al. Nanotechnology: An integrated approach towards agriculture production and environmental stress tolerance in plants. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2023, 234(11): 666. |
| [40] | Zhao T M, Li Y B, Chen W F, et al. Effect of biochar on the physicochemical properties of coastal saline soil and the antioxidation system activity in maize seedlings. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2): 196-200. |
| 赵铁民, 李渊博, 陈为峰, 等. 生物炭对滨海盐渍土理化性质及玉米幼苗抗氧化系统的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2): 196-200. | |
| [41] | Xiang Y, Li Y Q, Zheng C Z, et al. Advances in the application of biochar in sandy soil remediation. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(4): 315-326. |
| 向宇, 李玉强, 郑成卓, 等. 生物炭在沙质土壤修复中的应用研究进展. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(4): 315-326. | |
| [42] | Li H T, Zhang Z D, Wen L Z, et al. Response of biochar and nano-silica in alleviating cadmium stress in rape. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 31(3): 1-5, 11. |
| 李海涛, 张召娣, 温立政, 等. 生物炭与纳米硅缓解油菜镉胁迫效应. 天津农业科学, 2025, 31(3): 1-5, 11. | |
| [43] | Wang Z M, Sheng Y K, Zhang Z D, et al. Effects of combined application of biochar and nano-silicaon photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of oilseed rape. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 56(7): 127-134. |
| 王子铭, 绳易坤, 张召娣, 等. 生物炭和纳米二氧化硅联合施用对油菜光合荧光特性的影响. 山东农业科学, 2024, 56(7): 127-134. | |
| [44] | Li H X, Lin Y, Zhou X B, et al. Research progress on heavy metals removal from wastewater by biochar-supported nano zero-valent iron. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022, 12(3): 787-793. |
| 李华夏, 林毅, 周小斌, 等. 生物炭负载纳米零价铁去除废水中重金属的研究进展. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(3): 787-793. | |
| [45] | Song P P, Ma W J, Wang J, et al. Preparation of iron-modified biochar and its application in heavy metal contaminated soils. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2022, 16(12): 4018-4036. |
| 宋佩佩, 马文静, 王军, 等. 铁改性生物炭的制备及其在重金属污染土壤修复技术中的应用进展. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(12): 4018-4036. | |
| [46] | Lu G X, Li X L, Qiao Y M, et al. Effects of seed pelleting on seed germination and physiological indexes of forages. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(3): 451-457. |
| 芦光新, 李希来, 乔有明, 等. 丸粒化处理对几种牧草种子萌发及生理特性的影响. 草地学报, 2011, 19(3): 451-457. | |
| [47] | Wang J Y, Riaz M, Babar S, et al. Iron-modified biochar alleviates salt-alkali stress in cotton by enhancing iron availability and rhizosphere microbiome-metabolite interactions. Plant and Soil, 2025, 516: 2101-2120. |
| [1] | 王奕涵, 史路萌, 李志坚, 周帮伟. 草种及生物炭添加对东北苏打盐碱地改良及牧草生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(5): 139-150. |
| [2] | 魏明, 吴欣蕊, 吴璇, 李昊, 伍国强, 张伟杰, 程子义. 甜菜碱醛脱氢酶基因BvBADH2的克隆及在植物盐胁迫中的作用[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(5): 185-195. |
| [3] | 刘畅, 陈积山, 朱瑞芬, 孙万斌, 姚博, 董世魁. 有机肥和生物炭添加对亚热带人工草地土壤微生物碳、磷限制的缓解作用[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(4): 54-66. |
| [4] | 马祥, 李中兴, 杨容尘, 琚泽亮, 贾志锋, 杨培志. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐性燕麦糖类及内源激素含量变化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(3): 235-244. |
| [5] | 刘沂欣, 隋晓青, 王鑫尧, 郎梦卿, 孙凌子寅, 吉尔尔格. 外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿的缓解作用[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(9): 206-214. |
| [6] | 张晴晴, 马兴羽, 鲁艳, 赵广兴, 曾凡江, 黄彩变. 沙化盐渍土地不同生长时期油莎豆的耐盐性差异研究[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(6): 168-180. |
| [7] | 田戈, 南丽丽, 王利群, 马香香, 何蓉, 郭佳雨. 盐胁迫下外源ABA对红豆草幼苗生长与生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(10): 95-106. |
| [8] | 蔡文祺, 李淑霞, 王晓彤, 宋文学, 麻旭霞, 马小梅, 李小红, 代昕瑶. 外源褪黑素与乙烯交互对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(1): 80-93. |
| [9] | 张震欢, 姚立蓉, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 杨轲, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 李葆春. 盐生草AKR基因家族成员的鉴定及根系盐胁迫响应基因HgAKR42639的耐盐分析[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(7): 68-83. |
| [10] | 王萌, 鲁雪莉, 王菊英, 张梦超, 宋奕汝, 孟晨, 张莉, 徐宗昌. 小黑麦种质萌发期苗期耐盐资源评价与筛选[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 58-68. |
| [11] | 赵艳兰, 曾鑫奕, 弓晋超, 李香君, 李旭旭, 刘珊, 张新全, 周冀琼. 丛枝菌根真菌接种对白车轴草耐盐性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(3): 179-188. |
| [12] | 孟晨, 鲁雪莉, 王菊英, 魏云冲, 张成省, 李义强, 徐宗昌. 不同类型盐胁迫对小黑麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(12): 171-180. |
| [13] | 陆姣云, 田宏, 张鹤山, 熊军波, 刘洋, 王振南. H2O2浸种对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(10): 141-152. |
| [14] | 谢文辉, 黄莉娟, 赵丽丽, 王雷挺, 赵文武. 钙盐胁迫对3份葛藤种质种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(7): 220-233. |
| [15] | 陈意超, 孙晓莹, 解智杰, 周攀, 张露, 高雪莉, 李东, 刘晓风. 根际促生菌的筛选及其在尾矿改良中的应用[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(7): 50-63. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||