双乙酸钠对苜蓿青贮品质、营养成分及蛋白分子结构的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2019246

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了促进节粮型畜牧业发展,为反刍动物提供优质青贮饲料。研究了添加剂(双乙酸钠)在紫花苜蓿青贮中的最佳作用剂量,通过在青贮过程中添加不同浓度的双乙酸钠,探究其对苜蓿青贮发酵品质、营养特性以及蛋白质分子结构的影响。选用6月初第一茬刈割的初花期金皇后紫花苜蓿为原料进行青贮,试验组依据双乙酸钠的添加水平设0(对照),0.1%、0.2%、0.3%、0.4%、0.5%、0.6%和0.7%共8个处理组,在常温下贮藏45 d后测定相关指标。测定结果如下:添加双乙酸钠组苜蓿青贮饲料pH值显著低于对照组(P<0.05),中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量也显著降低,感官评分试验组均优于对照组。双乙酸钠添加量为0.7%时,蛋白质含量最高,丙酸、丁酸及氨态氮含量最低;酰胺Ⅰ、Ⅱ区的峰高及峰面积显著降低,α-螺旋区与β-折叠区中心高度比显著升高。这表明添加双乙酸钠能显著改善青贮苜蓿的营养特性、发酵品质以及蛋白质分子结构。综合本试验数据及经济成本考量,双乙酸钠最佳添加量为0.5%~0.6%。

关键词: 苜蓿, 青贮, 双乙酸钠, 发酵品质, 分子结构

Abstract: This research investigated the optimal concentration of sodium diacetate when used as an additive in alfalfa silage production. Such technology is valuable to provide forage of superior nutritive value and enhance economic performance and development of ruminant livestock industries. An alfalfa crop (cv. Golden queen) at early flowering growth stage in the first harvest in early June was divided into eight parts and ensiled in laboratory mini-silos with sodium diacetate added to each at different rates of 0% (Control), 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6% and 0.7% by weight. After 45 days fermentation at room temperature, the silage quality, nutritional properties, and protein molecular structure differences of the eight silages were evaluated. The results were as follows: the pH value, and neutral and acid detergent fiber contents of the sodium diacetate-treated silages were significantly lower than those of the Control treatment (P<0.05), and the sensory score of treated silages was better than that of the Control treatment. Compared with the Control silage and the other silages treated at lower rates, the addition of 0.7% sodium diacetate resulted in the highest protein content, and the lowest contents of propionic acid, butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen. In addition, protein structure evaluation indicated that the peak height and peak areas of the amide Ⅰ and Ⅱ regions were significantly decreased, and the ratio of the α-helical region height to the β-fold region height was significantly increased. This study indicates that the addition of an appropriate amount of sodium diacetate in silage production significantly improves the nutritional quality, fermentation quality and protein molecular structure of alfalfa silage. Balancing silage quality improvement against economic cost considerations, the data indicate that the optimum dosage of sodium diacetate is 0.5%-0.6%.

Key words: alfalfa, silage, sodium diacetate, fermentation quality, molecular structure

李艳芬, 程金花, 田川尧, 田雨佳, 卢冬亚, 张建斌. 双乙酸钠对苜蓿青贮品质、营养成分及蛋白分子结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 163-171.

LI Yan-fen, CHENG Jin-hua, TIAN Chuan-yao, TIAN Yu-jia, LU Dong-ya, ZHANG Jian-bin. Effects of sodium diacetate on the quality, nutrient composition and protein molecular structure of alfalfa silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(2): 163-171.

参考文献

[1] Zhang T, Li L, Cui Z J, et al. The effect of different silage inoculants bacteria on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. Qinghai Prataculture, 2009, 18(3): 1-7.
张涛, 李蕾, 崔宗均, 等. 添加不同青贮菌剂对苜蓿青贮效果的影响. 青海草业, 2009, 18(3): 1-7.
[2] Yu Z, Sun Q Z. Forage silage technology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2011: 152-157.
玉柱, 孙启忠. 饲草青贮技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011: 152-157.
[3] Wang Y, Yu Z. Effect of different additives on quality of Medicago sativa silage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010, 32(5): 80-84.
王莹, 玉柱. 不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(5): 80-84.
[4] Kung Jr L, Ranjit N K. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84(5): 1149-1155.
[5] Yin G L, Shi J, Zhang Z M, et al. Effect of additives treatment on alfalfa silage quality. Feed Research, 2017, (6): 1-4.
尹国丽, 史静, 张贞明, 等. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 饲料研究, 2017, (6): 1-4.
[6] Xia M, Wang Y Q, Wu H X, et al. Effect of additives treatment on alfalfa silage quality. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2014, 35(10): 30-35.
夏明, 王育青, 吴洪新, 等. 不同添加剂处理对苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2014, 35(10): 30-35.
[7] Wang G L, Li S, Jia C L, et al. The effect of microbe compound additives on alfalfa silage. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2010, 25(S1): 305-308.
王国良, 李顺, 贾春林, 等. 微生物复合添加剂对苜蓿青贮效果的影响. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(S1): 305-308.
[8] Zhang X H, Zhang Y G, Hao Y F. Effect of adding two types of sodium acetate compounds on corn silage quality and aerobic stability. Scientia Agriculturae Sinica, 2008, 41(6): 1810-1815.
张新慧, 张永根, 郝英飞. 添加两种乙酸钠盐对玉米青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6): 1810-1815.
[9] Chen W N, Wang C W. The application of sodium diacetate in animal production. Jiangxi Feed, 2018, (1): 10-12.
陈文宁, 王琤韡. 浅谈双乙酸钠在动物生产中的应用. 江西饲料, 2018, (1): 10-12.
[10] Pan Z L, Geng Z C, Ding C H, et al. Effect of sodium diacetate on weight gain of broilers. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2007, (5): 64-65.
潘振亮, 耿忠诚, 丁翠华, 等. 添加双乙酸钠对肉仔鸡增重效果的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2007, (5): 64-65.
[11] Zhang J Y, Wang J Q, Wang J, et al. Effects of baled total mixed ration supplemented with sodium diacetate on performance and digestive characteristiecs of dairy cows. China Feed, 2009, (9): 22-25.
张俊瑜, 王加启, 王晶, 等. 裹包全混合日粮中添加双乙酸钠对奶牛生产性能及消化特性的影响. 中国饲料, 2009, (9): 22-25.
[12] Liu R X, Sun Q Z, Bao N. The studies of artemisia ordosica silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(2): 264-268.
刘瑞香, 孙启忠, 包娜. 油蒿的可青贮性研究. 草地学报, 2011, 19(2): 264-268.
[13] Yan P S, Li R Z. Environmental hygiene of domestic animals. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2011: 311-313.
颜培实, 李如治. 家畜环境卫生学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011: 311-313.
[14] Gao Q, Yin J H, Mu H R, et al. The determination of lactic acid levels in beer used p-hydroxybiphenol colorimetry. Liquor Making, 2005, 32(6): 93-95.
高庆, 印建和, 穆华荣, 等. 对羟基联苯法测定啤酒中的乳酸. 酿酒, 2005, 32(6): 93-95.
[15] Zhao X T, Xu G Z, Liu J B, et al. Study on VFAs content in the anaerobic fermentation liquid by gas chromatography. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2013, (5): 584-591.
赵兴涛, 徐桂转, 刘杰博, 等. 气相色谱法测定厌氧发酵液中挥发性脂肪酸的研究. 河南农业大学学报, 2013, (5): 584-591.
[16] He J H. Feed analysis and detection. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2011: 16-178.
贺建华. 饲料分析与检测. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011: 16-178.
[17] Tian Y J, Guo P, Li S L, et al. Effects of microbial anaerobic fermentation on molecular structural characteristics and nutritional components of Zhang hybrid millet straw. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 54(11): 89-92.
田雨佳, 郭鹏, 李胜利, 等. 微生物厌氧发酵处理对张杂谷谷草分子结构特征和营养成分的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2018, 54(11): 89-92.
[18] Xie M X, Liu Y. Studies on amide Ⅲ infrared bands for the secondary structure determination of proteins. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2003, 24(2): 226-231.
谢孟峡, 刘媛. 红外光谱酰胺Ⅲ带用于蛋白质二级结构的测定研究. 高等学校化学学报, 2003, 24(2): 226-231.
[19] Guo W J, Wang J Q, Wang J, et al. Effect of sodium diacetate on storage effect of wrapped TMR//China Dairy Association. papers collection of annual meeting of china dairy association 2009 (Volume 1). China Dairy Association: China Dairy Cow Editorial Department, 2009: 4.
国卫杰, 王加启, 王晶, 等. 双乙酸钠对裹包TMR贮存效果的影响//中国奶业协会. 中国奶业协会年会论文集2009(上册). 中国奶业协会: 中国奶牛编辑部, 2009: 4.
[20] Oude Elferink S J W H, Driehuis F, Gottschal J C, et al. Aneaero bicdeg radation of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1, 2 propanedial, a novel fermentation pathway in Lactobacillus buchneri helps to improve the aerobic stability of maize silage. Sweden: Swedish University Agriculturae Science, Uppsala, 1999, 266-267.
[21] Kung L Jr, Ranjit N K. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84: 1149-1155.
[22] Zhang T, Cui Z J, Li J P, et al. The effect of different fermentation type of silage inoculants bacteria on the fermentation of silage. Acta Pratacultural Science, 2005, 14(3): 67-71.
张涛, 崔宗均, 李建平, 等. 不同发酵类型青贮菌制剂对青贮发酵的影响. 草业学报, 2005, 14(3): 67-71.
[23] Guo X S, Ding W R, Yu Z. The evaluation system of fermentation quality of ensiled forage and its improvement. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(4): 100-106.
郭旭生, 丁武蓉, 玉柱. 青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(4): 100-106.
[24] Yu P. Application of advanced synchrotron-based fourier transform infrared (SR-FTIR) microspectroscopy to animal nutrition and feed science: A novel approach. The British Journal of Nutrition, 2004, 92(6): 869-885.
[25] Gao H Y, Xu Q, Yang Z H. Research on protein secondary structure by Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences (Natural Science), 2009, 29(3): 47-53.
高红艳, 许强, 杨志怀. FT-IR在研究蛋白质二级结构中的应用. 宝鸡文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2009, 29(3): 47-53.
[26] Wu P, Siesler H W. Two-dimensional correlation analysis of variable-temperature fourier-transform mid- and near-infrared spectra of polyamide Ⅱ. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2000, 521(1): 37-47.
[27] Fu F N, Deoliverira D B, Trumble W R, et al. Secondary structure estimation of proteins using the amide Ⅲ region of fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: applications to analyze calciumbinding-induced structural changes in calsequestrin. Applied Spectroscopy, 1994, 48(11): 1432-1441.
[28] Bian W D, Sun S Q, Huang Y S, et al. Study on thermal unfolding process of trichosanthin by FTIR spectroscopy. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2000, (4): 471-473.
卞为东, 孙素琴, 黄岳顺, 等. FTIR光谱法研究天花粉蛋白的热去折叠过程. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2000, (4): 471-473.
[29] Yu P. Protein molecular structures, protein subfractions, and protein availability affected by heat processing. American Journal of Biotechnology and Biotechadogy, 2007, 3(2): 66-86.
[30] Barth A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. BBA-Bioenergetics, 2007, 1767(9): 1073-1101.
[31] Wetzel D L, Srivarin P, Finney J R. Revealing protein infrared spectral detail in a heterogeneous matrix dominated by starch. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2003, 31(1): 109-114.
[32] Ban Y. Molecular structural, physiochemical and nutritional characterization of new lines of brassica carinata and the coproducts. Saskatchewan USA: University of Saskatchewan, 2016.