草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 133-138.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020257
尹祥(), 王咏琪, 李鑫琴, 田静, 王晓亚, 张建国(
)
收稿日期:
2020-06-02
修回日期:
2020-07-01
出版日期:
2021-07-20
发布日期:
2021-06-03
通讯作者:
张建国
作者简介:
Corresponding author. E-mail: zhangjg@scau.edu.com基金资助:
Xiang YIN(), Yong-qi WANG, Xin-qin LI, Jing TIAN, Xiao-ya WANG, Jian-guo ZHANG(
)
Received:
2020-06-02
Revised:
2020-07-01
Online:
2021-07-20
Published:
2021-06-03
Contact:
Jian-guo ZHANG
摘要:
象草收获时往往具有较高水分,单独青贮发酵品质不佳。为提高象草青贮品质,研究了不同水分吸附材料对象草青贮发酵品质和好氧稳定性的影响。处理设为对照、分别添加象草鲜重10%的米糠、小麦粉、干豆腐渣和麦麸。青贮60 d后分析发酵品质和好氧稳定性。结果表明:所有添加处理均比对照显著增加了青贮原材料的干物质(DM, P<0.01),降低了缓冲能(P<0.05);青贮后,所有添加处理均显著提高了乳酸含量(P<0.01)。添加小麦粉显著增加了丁酸(0.81% DM)和氨态氮(NH3-N, 14.40% TN)含量(P<0.05),而其他添加处理无显著影响(P>0.05),添加干豆腐渣的处理丁酸和氨态氮含量最低,分别只有0.04% DM和9.75% TN。添加小麦粉和干豆腐渣对青贮饲料好氧稳定性改善效果最佳。综合比较分析营养特性、青贮发酵品质和好氧稳定性,添加干豆腐渣的处理青贮效果最优。
尹祥, 王咏琪, 李鑫琴, 田静, 王晓亚, 张建国. 不同水分吸附材料对象草青贮发酵品质及好氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 133-138.
Xiang YIN, Yong-qi WANG, Xin-qin LI, Jing TIAN, Xiao-ya WANG, Jian-guo ZHANG. Effects of various moisture-absorbing roughages on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of napier grass silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 133-138.
项目 Items | CK | MK | XM | DZ | MF | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质Dry matter (DM,% FM) | 15.44±0.31b | 21.65±0.88a | 20.86±0.11a | 22.53±0.35a | 22.18±0.77a | ** |
粗蛋白Crude protein (CP, % DM) | 9.78±0.32c | 7.90±0.40d | 12.38±0.00b | 13.03±0.07b | 14.51±0.06a | ** |
粗纤维Crude fiber (CF, % DM) | 39.30±0.32b | 43.37±1.46a | 29.77±1.14c | 36.59±1.13b | 30.33±0.36c | ** |
粗灰分Crude ash (CA, % DM) | 14.97±0.25a | 14.34±0.11a | 10.18±0.10c | 10.52±0.21c | 12.37±0.30b | ** |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (NDF, % DM) | 64.47±0.86 | 63.21±2.03 | 62.92±0.30 | 61.11±0.10 | 60.92±0.38 | NS |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (ADF, % DM) | 41.69±0.17a | 43.19±0.87a | 28.22±0.72c | 43.02±0.68a | 35.36±0.58b | ** |
可溶性碳水化合物Water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC, % DM) | 6.72±0.71 | 6.71±0.88 | 10.17±0.39 | 7.63±0.37 | 7.42±1.36 | NS |
pH | 5.89±0.05c | 6.15±0.02b | 6.55±0.05a | 5.97±0.05c | 6.59±0.02a | ** |
缓冲能Buffer capacity (mEq·kg-1 DM) | 203.90±0.39a | 136.75±6.13bc | 126.46±6.27c | 137.24±3.93bc | 171.43±23.84ab | * |
乳酸菌Lactic acid bacteria (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 3.42±0.25c | 3.97±0.06bc | 3.84±0.11bc | 4.43±0.12a | 4.07±0.14ab | ** |
好氧细菌Aerobic bacteria (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 5.99±0.01bc | 6.06±0.23bc | 6.28±0.01b | 6.19±0.04bc | 6.79±0.07a | ** |
酵母Yeast (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 4.48±0.10a | 4.34±0.08a | 4.49±0.01a | 4.43±0.03a | 4.07±0.07b | * |
霉菌Mold (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 3.41±0.15 | 3.39±0.22 | 3.51±0.31 | 3.47±0.08 | 3.21±0.06 | NS |
表1 添加水分吸附材料后的营养成分和微生物数量
Table 1 Nutrient index and microbial counts before silage treatment with different moisture-absorbing materials
项目 Items | CK | MK | XM | DZ | MF | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质Dry matter (DM,% FM) | 15.44±0.31b | 21.65±0.88a | 20.86±0.11a | 22.53±0.35a | 22.18±0.77a | ** |
粗蛋白Crude protein (CP, % DM) | 9.78±0.32c | 7.90±0.40d | 12.38±0.00b | 13.03±0.07b | 14.51±0.06a | ** |
粗纤维Crude fiber (CF, % DM) | 39.30±0.32b | 43.37±1.46a | 29.77±1.14c | 36.59±1.13b | 30.33±0.36c | ** |
粗灰分Crude ash (CA, % DM) | 14.97±0.25a | 14.34±0.11a | 10.18±0.10c | 10.52±0.21c | 12.37±0.30b | ** |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (NDF, % DM) | 64.47±0.86 | 63.21±2.03 | 62.92±0.30 | 61.11±0.10 | 60.92±0.38 | NS |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (ADF, % DM) | 41.69±0.17a | 43.19±0.87a | 28.22±0.72c | 43.02±0.68a | 35.36±0.58b | ** |
可溶性碳水化合物Water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC, % DM) | 6.72±0.71 | 6.71±0.88 | 10.17±0.39 | 7.63±0.37 | 7.42±1.36 | NS |
pH | 5.89±0.05c | 6.15±0.02b | 6.55±0.05a | 5.97±0.05c | 6.59±0.02a | ** |
缓冲能Buffer capacity (mEq·kg-1 DM) | 203.90±0.39a | 136.75±6.13bc | 126.46±6.27c | 137.24±3.93bc | 171.43±23.84ab | * |
乳酸菌Lactic acid bacteria (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 3.42±0.25c | 3.97±0.06bc | 3.84±0.11bc | 4.43±0.12a | 4.07±0.14ab | ** |
好氧细菌Aerobic bacteria (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 5.99±0.01bc | 6.06±0.23bc | 6.28±0.01b | 6.19±0.04bc | 6.79±0.07a | ** |
酵母Yeast (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 4.48±0.10a | 4.34±0.08a | 4.49±0.01a | 4.43±0.03a | 4.07±0.07b | * |
霉菌Mold (log10 cfu·g-1 FM) | 3.41±0.15 | 3.39±0.22 | 3.51±0.31 | 3.47±0.08 | 3.21±0.06 | NS |
处理 Treatment | DM (% FM) | pH | 乳酸 Lactic acid (% DM) | 乙酸 Acetic acid (% DM) | 丙酸 Propionic acid (% DM) | 丁酸 Butyric acid (% DM) | NH3-N (% TN) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.68±0.47b | 4.47±0.15 | 4.95±1.65b | 1.51±0.11 | 0.35±0.17 | 0.17±0.09b | 11.30±1.78b |
MK | 20.51±0.50a | 4.55±0.11 | 7.81±0.11a | 1.71±0.16 | 0.15±0.15 | 0.11±0.04b | 9.94±0.23b |
XM | 20.18±0.15a | 4.61±0.02 | 7.65±1.22a | 2.92±0.72 | 0.61±0.07 | 0.81±0.14a | 14.40±0.40a |
DZ | 20.04±0.27a | 4.69±0.04 | 7.74±0.76a | 2.59±0.65 | 0.40±0.11 | 0.04±0.02b | 9.75±0.23b |
MF | 21.43±0.72a | 4.46±0.03 | 6.55±0.67a | 1.25±0.10 | 0.30±0.03 | 0.21±0.04b | 11.63±0.89b |
显著性Significance | ** | NS | ** | NS | NS | * | * |
表2 不同水分吸附材料对象草青贮发酵品质的影响
Table 2 Effects of different moisture-absorbing materials on fermentation quality of napier grass silage
处理 Treatment | DM (% FM) | pH | 乳酸 Lactic acid (% DM) | 乙酸 Acetic acid (% DM) | 丙酸 Propionic acid (% DM) | 丁酸 Butyric acid (% DM) | NH3-N (% TN) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.68±0.47b | 4.47±0.15 | 4.95±1.65b | 1.51±0.11 | 0.35±0.17 | 0.17±0.09b | 11.30±1.78b |
MK | 20.51±0.50a | 4.55±0.11 | 7.81±0.11a | 1.71±0.16 | 0.15±0.15 | 0.11±0.04b | 9.94±0.23b |
XM | 20.18±0.15a | 4.61±0.02 | 7.65±1.22a | 2.92±0.72 | 0.61±0.07 | 0.81±0.14a | 14.40±0.40a |
DZ | 20.04±0.27a | 4.69±0.04 | 7.74±0.76a | 2.59±0.65 | 0.40±0.11 | 0.04±0.02b | 9.75±0.23b |
MF | 21.43±0.72a | 4.46±0.03 | 6.55±0.67a | 1.25±0.10 | 0.30±0.03 | 0.21±0.04b | 11.63±0.89b |
显著性Significance | ** | NS | ** | NS | NS | * | * |
处理Treatment | 乳酸菌Lactic acid bacteria | 好氧细菌Aerobic bacteria | 酵母Yeast | 霉菌Mold |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.65±0.25ab | 4.10±0.16 | ND | ND |
MK | 5.11±0.13a | 4.45±0.31 | ND | ND |
XM | 4.20±0.23b | 3.99±0.26 | ND | ND |
DZ | 4.52±0.22b | 3.99±0.08 | ND | ND |
MF | 4.39±0.11b | 4.19±0.15 | ND | ND |
显著性Significance | * | NS | - | - |
表3 不同水分吸附材料对象草青贮饲料微生物数量的影响
Table 3 Effects of different moisture-absorbing materials on the number of microorganisms of napier grass silage (log10 cfu·g-1 FM)
处理Treatment | 乳酸菌Lactic acid bacteria | 好氧细菌Aerobic bacteria | 酵母Yeast | 霉菌Mold |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.65±0.25ab | 4.10±0.16 | ND | ND |
MK | 5.11±0.13a | 4.45±0.31 | ND | ND |
XM | 4.20±0.23b | 3.99±0.26 | ND | ND |
DZ | 4.52±0.22b | 3.99±0.08 | ND | ND |
MF | 4.39±0.11b | 4.19±0.15 | ND | ND |
显著性Significance | * | NS | - | - |
1 | Patrlzl W, Madrugacrf M T, Nogueira M M. Effect of commercial biological additives on elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) silage. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 2004, 56(3): 392-397. |
2 | Gollop N, Zakin V, Weinberg Z G. Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria included in inoculants for silage and in silages treated with these inoculants. Journal Applied Microbiology, 2005, 98(3): 662-666. |
3 | McDonald P, Henderson A R, Heron S J E. The biochemistry of silage (2nd Edition). Marlow, UK: Chalcombe Publications, 1991. |
4 | Ferraretto L F, Taysom K, Taysom D M, et al. Relationships between dry matter content, ensiling, ammonia-nitrogen, and ruminal in vitro starch digestibility in high-moisture corn samples. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(5): 3221-3227. |
5 | Jones R, Jones D I H. The effect of in-silo effluent absorbents on effluent production and silage quality. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1996, 64(3): 173-186. |
6 | Ferris C P, Mayne C S. The effects of incorporating sugar-beet pulp with herbage at ensiling on silage fermentation, effluent output and in-silo losses. Grass and Forage Science, 1994, 49(2): 216-228. |
7 | Pan S G. Feasibility study on production of biological protein feed from waste soybean dregs. Modern Animal Husbandry Science & Technology, 2017(10): 8-9. |
潘树国. 废豆渣生产生物蛋白饲料可行性研究. 现代畜牧科技, 2017(10): 8-9. | |
8 | Cai H Y, Yu J Y, Liu S J, et al. Feed with liquid feeding on growth performance for growing finishing pigs. Feed Industry, 2018(16): 1-5. |
蔡辉益, 于继英, 刘世杰, 等. 发酵豆渣替代部分颗粒饲料液体饲喂生长育肥猪效果. 饲料工业, 2018(16): 1-5. | |
9 | Zhang L Y. Feed analysis and feed quality detection technology. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2003: 46-75. |
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2003: 46-75. | |
10 | Han Y S. Food chemistry experiment guide. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1996: 19-22. |
韩雅珊. 食品化学实验指导. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1996: 19-22. | |
11 | McDoland P, Playne M J. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1966, 17: 264-265. |
12 | Lv W L, Diao Q Y, Yan G L. Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of green corn-straw silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 143-148. |
吕文龙, 刁其玉, 闫贵龙. 布氏乳杆菌对青玉米秸青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 143-148. | |
13 | Fu T. Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation process and quality of corn silage. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2005. |
傅彤. 微生物接种剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵进程及其品质的影响. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2005. | |
14 | Cheng H Q, Zhang W W, Chen Z P, et al. Effect of overshadow on the nutritional components in Desmodium intortum. Journal of South China Normal University, 2000, 8(3): 88-91. |
程惠青, 张文文, 陈兆平, 等. 遮荫对旋扭山绿豆的营养成分的影响. 华南师范大学学报, 2000, 8(3): 88-91. | |
15 | Zheng M, Niu D, Zuo S, et al. The effect of cultivar, wilting and storage period on fermentation and the clostridial community of alfalfa silage. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 17(2): 336-346. |
16 | Wang C Z, Wang T. Feed science. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2003: 122-140. |
王成章, 王恬. 饲料学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 122-140. | |
17 | He Y P, Guo Y L, Qin S Z, et al. Effect of adding rice bran and wheat bran on silage quality of different cultivars of potato vines. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015, 27(10): 3311-3318. |
何玉鹏, 郭艳丽, 秦士贞, 等. 添加米糠和小麦麸对不同品种马铃薯茎叶青贮品质的影响. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(10): 3311-3318. | |
18 | Zhou M. Chemical composition, nutrition value and feed technology of wheat. Feed and Animal Husbandry, 2006(10): 28-31. |
周明. 小麦的营养价值与饲用技术. 饲料与畜牧, 2006(10): 28-31. | |
19 | Liu Q H, Fan C G, Zhang J G, et al. The effects of chopping and additives on the silage quality of Brachial decumbens cv. Reyan No. 3. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(1): 51-56. |
刘秦华, 范传广, 张建国, 等. 切短与添加物对臂形草青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(1): 51-56. | |
20 | Liu Q H, Zhang J G, Lu X L. The effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of king grass silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(4): 133-139. |
刘秦华, 张建国, 卢小良. 乳酸菌添加剂对王草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 133-139. |
[1] | 邹诗雨, 陈思葵, 唐启源, 陈东, 陈元伟, 邓攀, 黄胥莱, 李付强. 青贮剂对再生稻头季全株青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 122-132. |
[2] | 张丹丹, 张元庆, 程景, 靳光, 李博, 王栋才, 徐芳, 孙锐锋. 不同粗饲料组合对晋南牛瘤胃体外发酵特性的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 93-100. |
[3] | 黄丽琴, 李松桥, 袁振中, 唐晶, 闫景彩, 唐启源. 全株水稻与平菇菌糠共发酵料对浏阳黑山羊屠宰性能、肉品质和器官指数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 133-140. |
[4] | 祁鹤兴, 芦光新, 李宗仁, 徐成体, 德科加, 周孝娟, 王英成, 马桂花. 青海省青贮玉米链格孢叶枯病病原菌鉴定及其致病力分析[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 94-105. |
[5] | 谢展, 穆麟, 张志飞, 陈桂华, 刘洋, 高帅, 魏仲珊. 乳酸菌或有机酸盐与尿素复配添加对紫花苜蓿混合青贮的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 165-173. |
[6] | 吕竑建, 郭香, 陈德奎, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 植物乳酸菌和贮藏温度对辣木叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 121-128. |
[7] | 张生伟, 王小平, 张展海, 马友记, 滚双宝, 杨巧丽, 高小莉, 张保军. 青贮杂交构树对杜湖杂交肉羊生长性能、血清生化指标和肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 89-99. |
[8] | 娄芬, 李小冬, 尚以顺, 吴佳海, 张蓉, 甘小波, 熊俊, 陈光吉, 李世歌, 裴成江. 毕节地区适宜青贮玉米品种(系)筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 214-224. |
[9] | 董文成, 林语梵, 朱鸿福, 张欢, 张桂杰. 不同品种葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 129-137. |
[10] | 于浩然, 格根图, 王志军, 贾玉山, 连植, 贾鹏飞. 甲酸添加剂及青贮时间对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 89-95. |
[11] | 任昱鑫, 代寒凌, 田新会, 杜文华. 添加剂对甘肃省高寒牧区不同刈割期小黑麦青贮饲料营养品质和青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 197-206. |
[12] | 李艳芬, 程金花, 田川尧, 田雨佳, 卢冬亚, 张建斌. 双乙酸钠对苜蓿青贮品质、营养成分及蛋白分子结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 163-171. |
[13] | 肖燕子, 徐丽君, 辛晓平, 乌仁其其格null, 孙林, 姜超. 呼伦贝尔地区不同燕麦品种的营养价值及发酵品质评价研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 171-179. |
[14] | 宗成, 张健, 邵涛, 董志浩, 李君风, 唐露, 冉启凡, 刘秦华. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮饲料发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 180-187. |
[15] | 万学瑞, 豆思远, 李玉, 何轶群, 王川, 张小丽, 雷赵民. 复合乳酸菌对全株玉米青贮及有氧暴露后微生物及饲料品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 83-90. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 442
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 299
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||