草业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 212-222.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024294
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
韩航琪1,2(
), 王梓凡1, 丁赫1,2, 陈玉荣3, 王琦3, 张晓庆1,2(
)
收稿日期:2024-07-23
修回日期:2024-09-12
出版日期:2025-05-20
发布日期:2025-03-20
通讯作者:
张晓庆
作者简介:E-mail: zhangxiaoqing@caas.cn基金资助:
Hang-qi HAN1,2(
), Zi-fan WANG1, He DING1,2, Yu-rong CHEN3, Qi WANG3, Xiao-qing ZHANG1,2(
)
Received:2024-07-23
Revised:2024-09-12
Online:2025-05-20
Published:2025-03-20
Contact:
Xiao-qing ZHANG
摘要:
本试验旨在研究燕麦草块对绵羊瘤胃发酵及微生物组成的影响。选用12只1岁左右、体重相近的公羔羊,随机分为2个处理组。其中一组饲喂不经过任何加工的燕麦干草(OH组),另一组饲喂燕麦草块(OC组)。两组饲喂质量和数量均相同的商业羊用精饲料补充料。试验期60 d,其中预试期10 d,正试期50 d。结果表明:1)OC组干物质、粗蛋白质、中性和酸性洗涤纤维采食量均显著高于OH组(P≤0.05)。2)与OH组相比,OC组瘤胃pH、总挥发性脂肪酸、乙酸和丙酸含量、乙酸/丙酸以及氨态氮浓度没有显著变化(P>0.05)。3)两处理组瘤胃细菌OTU数目和Chao1指数无显著差异(P>0.05),但OC组瘤胃细菌Shannon指数和Simpson指数显著高于OH组(P≤0.05)。4)在门水平瘤胃细菌组成上,两处理组均以拟杆菌门和厚壁菌门为优势菌门,但OC组的未命名细菌门、疣微菌门、浮霉菌门、圣诞岛盐菌门、酸杆菌门、绿弯菌门、黏胶球形菌门和放线菌门相对丰度均显著高于OH组(P≤0.05),拟杆菌门相对丰度有显著增加的趋势(P=0.075)而其丝状杆菌门相对丰度有显著降低的趋势(P=0.096);在属水平上,OC组的瘤胃未命名细菌属相对丰度显著高于OH组(P≤0.05),未命名黏胶球形菌属相对丰度有显著增加的趋势(P=0.071),而其丝状杆菌属相对丰度有显著降低的趋势(P=0.069);在种水平上,OC组瘤胃普雷沃氏菌_sp._ lc2012相对丰度有显著高于OH组的趋势(P=0.065)。5)总挥发性脂肪酸与未命名细菌属(r=0.660,P=0.027)和细菌_P3(r=0.638,P=0.035)相对丰度呈显著正相关;乙酸与未命名普雷沃氏菌科(r=0.627,P=0.039)和Prevotellaceae_bacterium_MN60(r=0.752,P=0.008)相对丰度呈显著或极显著正相关,而与细菌_P3(r=-0.642,P=0.033)相对丰度呈显著负相关;丙酸与细菌_P3(r=0.647,P=0.031)相对丰度呈显著正相关;乙酸/丙酸与Prevotellaceae_bacterium_MN60(r=0.699,P=0.017)相对丰度呈显著正相关;氨态氮与另枝菌属(r=-0.752,P=0.008)相对丰度呈极显著负相关。综上所述,饲喂燕麦草块对绵羊瘤胃发酵没有不良影响,并且可以提高瘤胃菌群多样性和有益菌相对丰度,优化瘤胃微生物组成,适合在牛羊等反刍动物养殖中应用。
韩航琪, 王梓凡, 丁赫, 陈玉荣, 王琦, 张晓庆. 燕麦干草与燕麦草块对绵羊瘤胃发酵及微生物组成影响的比较分析[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 212-222.
Hang-qi HAN, Zi-fan WANG, He DING, Yu-rong CHEN, Qi WANG, Xiao-qing ZHANG. Comparative analysis of effects of oat hay and oat cubes on rumen fermentation and microbial composition in sheep[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 212-222.
采食量 Intake | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 干物质Dry matter (DM) | 0.95b | 1.22a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 粗蛋白质Crude protein (CP) | 0.08b | 0.10a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 0.50b | 0.69a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 0.30b | 0.39a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
表1 燕麦干草和燕麦草块对绵羊采食量的影响(干物质基础)
Table 1 Effects of oat hay and oat cube on feed intake of sheep (dry matter basis, kg·d-1)
采食量 Intake | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 干物质Dry matter (DM) | 0.95b | 1.22a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 粗蛋白质Crude protein (CP) | 0.08b | 0.10a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 0.50b | 0.69a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 0.30b | 0.39a | 0.01 | 0.001 |
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| pH | 7.09a | 7.04a | 0.05 | 0.339 |
| 总挥发性脂肪酸Total volatile fatty acid (TVFA, mmol·L-1) | 23.44a | 23.33a | 4.50 | 0.981 |
| 乙酸Acetic acid (%) | 71.35a | 71.20a | 2.28 | 0.950 |
| 丙酸Propionic acid (%) | 18.70a | 19.45a | 2.10 | 0.728 |
| 乙酸/丙酸Acetic acid/propionic acid | 3.95a | 3.80a | 0.57 | 0.798 |
| 氨态氮Ammonium nitrogen (NH3-N, mg·dL-1) | 6.15a | 7.12a | 0.97 | 0.344 |
表2 燕麦干草和燕麦草块对瘤胃发酵参数的影响
Table 2 Effects of oat hay and oat cube on rumen fermentation parameters
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| pH | 7.09a | 7.04a | 0.05 | 0.339 |
| 总挥发性脂肪酸Total volatile fatty acid (TVFA, mmol·L-1) | 23.44a | 23.33a | 4.50 | 0.981 |
| 乙酸Acetic acid (%) | 71.35a | 71.20a | 2.28 | 0.950 |
| 丙酸Propionic acid (%) | 18.70a | 19.45a | 2.10 | 0.728 |
| 乙酸/丙酸Acetic acid/propionic acid | 3.95a | 3.80a | 0.57 | 0.798 |
| 氨态氮Ammonium nitrogen (NH3-N, mg·dL-1) | 6.15a | 7.12a | 0.97 | 0.344 |
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| OTU数OTU number | 11037.17a | 11184.33a | 445.21 | 0.773 |
| Chao1指数Chao1 index | 11414.80a | 11419.42a | 432.62 | 0.993 |
| Shannon指数Shannon index | 5.85b | 6.39a | 0.23 | 0.043 |
| Simpson指数Simpson index | 0.86b | 0.91a | 0.01 | 0.014 |
| 覆盖率Coverage (%) | 99.997 | 99.997 | - | - |
表3 燕麦干草和燕麦草块对瘤胃细菌Alpha多样性的影响
Table 3 Effects of oat hay and oat cube on rumen bacterial Alpha diversity
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| OTU数OTU number | 11037.17a | 11184.33a | 445.21 | 0.773 |
| Chao1指数Chao1 index | 11414.80a | 11419.42a | 432.62 | 0.993 |
| Shannon指数Shannon index | 5.85b | 6.39a | 0.23 | 0.043 |
| Simpson指数Simpson index | 0.86b | 0.91a | 0.01 | 0.014 |
| 覆盖率Coverage (%) | 99.997 | 99.997 | - | - |
图1 瘤胃细菌构成的主成分分析和非度量多维尺度分析OH: 干草组Oat hay group; OC: 草块组Oat cube group; Stress: 应力系数.
Fig.1 Principal component analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NDMS) of rumen bacteria composition
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 未分类细菌门Bacteria_unclassified | 71.78a | 66.26b | 2.32 | 0.038 |
| 拟杆菌门Bacteroidetes | 18.16a | 21.23a | 1.55 | 0.075 |
| 厚壁菌门Firmicutes | 4.46a | 6.28a | 1.18 | 0.152 |
| 变形菌门Proteobacteria | 1.38a | 1.47a | 0.22 | 0.676 |
| 未命名细菌门Bacteria_noname | 0.95b | 1.53a | 0.16 | 0.004 |
| 丝状杆菌门Fibrobacteres | 1.53a | 0.53a | 0.54 | 0.096 |
| 黏胶球形菌门Lentisphaerae | 0.35b | 0.67a | 0.14 | 0.050 |
| 疣微菌门Verrucomicrobia | 0.24b | 0.41a | 0.05 | 0.010 |
| 放线菌门Actinobacteria | 0.17b | 0.22a | 0.02 | 0.050 |
| 螺旋体门Spirochaetes | 0.15a | 0.20a | 0.03 | 0.165 |
| 浮霉菌门Planctomycetes | 0.13b | 0.22a | 0.03 | 0.018 |
| 柔壁菌门Tenericutes | 0.09a | 0.19a | 0.06 | 0.122 |
| Candidatus Melainabacteria | 0.10a | 0.07a | 0.03 | 0.379 |
| Candidatus Saccharibacteria | 0.06a | 0.07a | 0.03 | 0.652 |
| 圣诞岛盐菌门Kiritimatiellaeota | 0.04b | 0.08a | 0.01 | 0.019 |
| 梭杆菌门Fusobacteria | 0.05a | 0.05a | 0.02 | 0.919 |
| 酸杆菌门Acidobacteria | 0.04b | 0.06a | 0.01 | 0.030 |
| 绿弯菌门Chloroflexi | 0.04b | 0.06a | 0.01 | 0.031 |
| 衣原体门Chlamydiae | 0.03a | 0.04a | 0.01 | 0.485 |
| 蓝藻Cyanobacteria | 0.03a | 0.03a | 0.01 | 0.360 |
| 其他Others | 0.22a | 0.33a | 0.05 | 0.057 |
表4 燕麦干草和燕麦草块对瘤胃菌群门水平相对丰度的影响
Table 4 Effects of oat hay and oat cube on the relative abundance of rumen microflora at phylum level (%)
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 未分类细菌门Bacteria_unclassified | 71.78a | 66.26b | 2.32 | 0.038 |
| 拟杆菌门Bacteroidetes | 18.16a | 21.23a | 1.55 | 0.075 |
| 厚壁菌门Firmicutes | 4.46a | 6.28a | 1.18 | 0.152 |
| 变形菌门Proteobacteria | 1.38a | 1.47a | 0.22 | 0.676 |
| 未命名细菌门Bacteria_noname | 0.95b | 1.53a | 0.16 | 0.004 |
| 丝状杆菌门Fibrobacteres | 1.53a | 0.53a | 0.54 | 0.096 |
| 黏胶球形菌门Lentisphaerae | 0.35b | 0.67a | 0.14 | 0.050 |
| 疣微菌门Verrucomicrobia | 0.24b | 0.41a | 0.05 | 0.010 |
| 放线菌门Actinobacteria | 0.17b | 0.22a | 0.02 | 0.050 |
| 螺旋体门Spirochaetes | 0.15a | 0.20a | 0.03 | 0.165 |
| 浮霉菌门Planctomycetes | 0.13b | 0.22a | 0.03 | 0.018 |
| 柔壁菌门Tenericutes | 0.09a | 0.19a | 0.06 | 0.122 |
| Candidatus Melainabacteria | 0.10a | 0.07a | 0.03 | 0.379 |
| Candidatus Saccharibacteria | 0.06a | 0.07a | 0.03 | 0.652 |
| 圣诞岛盐菌门Kiritimatiellaeota | 0.04b | 0.08a | 0.01 | 0.019 |
| 梭杆菌门Fusobacteria | 0.05a | 0.05a | 0.02 | 0.919 |
| 酸杆菌门Acidobacteria | 0.04b | 0.06a | 0.01 | 0.030 |
| 绿弯菌门Chloroflexi | 0.04b | 0.06a | 0.01 | 0.031 |
| 衣原体门Chlamydiae | 0.03a | 0.04a | 0.01 | 0.485 |
| 蓝藻Cyanobacteria | 0.03a | 0.03a | 0.01 | 0.360 |
| 其他Others | 0.22a | 0.33a | 0.05 | 0.057 |
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 未分类细菌属Unclassified_Bacteria | 36.15a | 28.93b | 2.58 | 0.019 |
| 普雷沃氏菌属Prevotella | 28.92a | 31.03a | 2.82 | 0.472 |
| 拟杆菌属Bacteroides | 6.22a | 6.06a | 0.45 | 0.733 |
| 未命名细菌属Bacteria_noname | 2.95b | 4.85a | 0.76 | 0.031 |
| 未命名拟杆菌目Bacteroidales_noname | 2.42a | 2.43a | 0.77 | 0.988 |
| 未命名普雷沃氏菌科Prevotellaceae_noname | 1.75a | 2.01a | 0.25 | 0.315 |
| 丝状杆菌属Fibrobacter | 2.05a | 0.75a | 0.64 | 0.069 |
| 另枝菌属Alistipes | 1.44a | 1.28a | 0.22 | 0.461 |
| 未命名拟杆菌属Bacteroidetes_noname | 1.06a | 0.76a | 0.48 | 0.538 |
| 未命名黏胶球形菌属Lentisphaerae_noname | 0.64a | 1.08a | 0.21 | 0.071 |
| 未命名厚壁菌属Firmicutes_noname | 0.60a | 0.97a | 0.29 | 0.227 |
| 梭状芽孢杆菌属Clostridium | 0.62a | 0.85a | 0.15 | 0.172 |
| 副普雷沃氏菌属Paraprevotella | 0.66a | 0.67a | 0.21 | 0.963 |
| 副拟杆菌属Parabacteroides | 0.61a | 0.65a | 0.23 | 0.108 |
| 异普雷沃氏菌属Alloprevotella | 0.50a | 0.65a | 0.14 | 0.310 |
| 未命名毛螺菌科Lachnospiraceae_noname | 0.40a | 0.60a | 0.12 | 0.134 |
| 瘤胃球菌属Ruminococcus | 0.40a | 0.51a | 0.13 | 0.461 |
| 解琥珀酸菌属Succiniclasticum | 0.40a | 0.48a | 0.17 | 0.668 |
| 琥珀酸弧菌属Succinivibrio | 0.44a | 0.42a | 0.16 | 0.900 |
| 未命名瘤胃菌科Ruminococcaceae_noname | 0.32a | 0.52a | 0.16 | 0.208 |
| 其他Others | 11.44a | 14.50a | 0.16 | 0.078 |
表5 燕麦干草和燕麦草块对瘤胃菌群属水平相对丰度的影响
Table 5 Effects of oat hay and oat cube on the relative abundance of rumen microflora at genus level (%)
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 未分类细菌属Unclassified_Bacteria | 36.15a | 28.93b | 2.58 | 0.019 |
| 普雷沃氏菌属Prevotella | 28.92a | 31.03a | 2.82 | 0.472 |
| 拟杆菌属Bacteroides | 6.22a | 6.06a | 0.45 | 0.733 |
| 未命名细菌属Bacteria_noname | 2.95b | 4.85a | 0.76 | 0.031 |
| 未命名拟杆菌目Bacteroidales_noname | 2.42a | 2.43a | 0.77 | 0.988 |
| 未命名普雷沃氏菌科Prevotellaceae_noname | 1.75a | 2.01a | 0.25 | 0.315 |
| 丝状杆菌属Fibrobacter | 2.05a | 0.75a | 0.64 | 0.069 |
| 另枝菌属Alistipes | 1.44a | 1.28a | 0.22 | 0.461 |
| 未命名拟杆菌属Bacteroidetes_noname | 1.06a | 0.76a | 0.48 | 0.538 |
| 未命名黏胶球形菌属Lentisphaerae_noname | 0.64a | 1.08a | 0.21 | 0.071 |
| 未命名厚壁菌属Firmicutes_noname | 0.60a | 0.97a | 0.29 | 0.227 |
| 梭状芽孢杆菌属Clostridium | 0.62a | 0.85a | 0.15 | 0.172 |
| 副普雷沃氏菌属Paraprevotella | 0.66a | 0.67a | 0.21 | 0.963 |
| 副拟杆菌属Parabacteroides | 0.61a | 0.65a | 0.23 | 0.108 |
| 异普雷沃氏菌属Alloprevotella | 0.50a | 0.65a | 0.14 | 0.310 |
| 未命名毛螺菌科Lachnospiraceae_noname | 0.40a | 0.60a | 0.12 | 0.134 |
| 瘤胃球菌属Ruminococcus | 0.40a | 0.51a | 0.13 | 0.461 |
| 解琥珀酸菌属Succiniclasticum | 0.40a | 0.48a | 0.17 | 0.668 |
| 琥珀酸弧菌属Succinivibrio | 0.44a | 0.42a | 0.16 | 0.900 |
| 未命名瘤胃菌科Ruminococcaceae_noname | 0.32a | 0.52a | 0.16 | 0.208 |
| 其他Others | 11.44a | 14.50a | 0.16 | 0.078 |
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 未分类细菌Unclassified_Bacteria | 31.58a | 24.56b | 2.44 | 0.017 |
| 栖瘤胃普雷沃氏菌Prevotella_ruminicola | 7.71a | 7.36a | 1.89 | 0.858 |
| 未分类普雷沃氏菌Prevotella_unclassified | 3.96a | 4.25a | 0.34 | 0.422 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._ne3005 Prevotella_sp._ne3005 | 2.10a | 2.70a | 0.63 | 0.359 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._tc2-28 Prevotella_sp._tc2-28 | 2.05a | 2.22a | 0.36 | 0.639 |
| 细菌_P3 Bacterium_P3 | 1.34a | 2.77a | 0.86 | 0.124 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._tf2-5 Prevotella_sp._tf2-5 | 1.35a | 2.03a | 0.48 | 0.191 |
| Bacteroidales_bacterium_WCE2004 | 1.32a | 1.21a | 0.74 | 0.880 |
| Prevotellaceae_bacterium_MN60 | 1.12a | 1.15a | 0.19 | 0.839 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._MA2016 Prevotella_sp._MA2016 | 1.02a | 1.00a | 0.18 | 0.934 |
| Prevotellaceae_bacterium_HUN156 | 0.89a | 1.05a | 0.12 | 0.218 |
| 未分类拟杆菌Bacteroides_unclassified | 0.96a | 0.96a | 0.09 | 0.958 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_brevis Prevotella_brevis | 0.90a | 1.01a | 0.10 | 0.287 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._BP1-148 Prevotella_sp._BP1-148 | 0.87a | 0.82a | 0.11 | 0.671 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._P6B4 Prevotella_sp._P6B4 | 0.73a | 0.82a | 0.23 | 0.703 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._P6B1 Prevotella_sp._P6B1 | 0.72a | 0.73a | 0.20 | 0.955 |
| Bacterium_P201 | 0.66a | 0.74a | 0.11 | 0.464 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._BP1-145 Prevotella_sp._BP1-145 | 0.74a | 0.64a | 0.10 | 0.314 |
| Bacteroidales_bacterium_WCE2008 | 0.67a | 0.64a | 0.16 | 0.845 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._lc2012 Prevotella_sp._lc2012 | 0.50a | 0.74a | 0.11 | 0.065 |
| 其他Others | 38.82a | 42.59a | 2.87 | 0.218 |
表6 燕麦干草和燕麦草块对瘤胃菌群种水平相对丰度的影响
Table 6 Effects of oat hay and oat cube on the relative abundance of rumen microflora at species level (%)
项目 Item | 处理组Treatment | 均值标准误 Standard error of mean (SEM) | P值 P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草组Oat hay (OH) | 草块组Oat cube (OC) | |||
| 未分类细菌Unclassified_Bacteria | 31.58a | 24.56b | 2.44 | 0.017 |
| 栖瘤胃普雷沃氏菌Prevotella_ruminicola | 7.71a | 7.36a | 1.89 | 0.858 |
| 未分类普雷沃氏菌Prevotella_unclassified | 3.96a | 4.25a | 0.34 | 0.422 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._ne3005 Prevotella_sp._ne3005 | 2.10a | 2.70a | 0.63 | 0.359 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._tc2-28 Prevotella_sp._tc2-28 | 2.05a | 2.22a | 0.36 | 0.639 |
| 细菌_P3 Bacterium_P3 | 1.34a | 2.77a | 0.86 | 0.124 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._tf2-5 Prevotella_sp._tf2-5 | 1.35a | 2.03a | 0.48 | 0.191 |
| Bacteroidales_bacterium_WCE2004 | 1.32a | 1.21a | 0.74 | 0.880 |
| Prevotellaceae_bacterium_MN60 | 1.12a | 1.15a | 0.19 | 0.839 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._MA2016 Prevotella_sp._MA2016 | 1.02a | 1.00a | 0.18 | 0.934 |
| Prevotellaceae_bacterium_HUN156 | 0.89a | 1.05a | 0.12 | 0.218 |
| 未分类拟杆菌Bacteroides_unclassified | 0.96a | 0.96a | 0.09 | 0.958 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_brevis Prevotella_brevis | 0.90a | 1.01a | 0.10 | 0.287 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._BP1-148 Prevotella_sp._BP1-148 | 0.87a | 0.82a | 0.11 | 0.671 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._P6B4 Prevotella_sp._P6B4 | 0.73a | 0.82a | 0.23 | 0.703 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._P6B1 Prevotella_sp._P6B1 | 0.72a | 0.73a | 0.20 | 0.955 |
| Bacterium_P201 | 0.66a | 0.74a | 0.11 | 0.464 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._BP1-145 Prevotella_sp._BP1-145 | 0.74a | 0.64a | 0.10 | 0.314 |
| Bacteroidales_bacterium_WCE2008 | 0.67a | 0.64a | 0.16 | 0.845 |
| 普雷沃氏菌_sp._lc2012 Prevotella_sp._lc2012 | 0.50a | 0.74a | 0.11 | 0.065 |
| 其他Others | 38.82a | 42.59a | 2.87 | 0.218 |
图2 种水平相对丰度排名前10%的瘤胃细菌物种差异分析1: 未分类丝状杆菌属Fibrobacter unclassified; 2: 丝状杆菌属_sp._UWB7 Fibrobacter_sp._UWB7; 3: 丝状杆菌属_sp._UWB16 Fibrobacter_sp._UWB16; 4: 丝状杆菌属_sp._UWB3 Fibrobacter_sp._UWB3; 5: 固氮螺菌属_sp._CAG:260 Azospirillum_sp._CAG:260; 6: Oribacterium_sp._C9; 7: Armatimonadetes_bacterium_C…G2_30_66_41; 8: Uncultured_bacterium_fosmid_pJB102C1; 9: 亮黄黑肠球菌 Ereboglobus luteus; 10: 瘤胃杆菌属_sp._RM87 Ruminobacter_sp._RM87; 11: Pseudoclostridium_thermosuccinogenes; 12: 梭状芽胞杆菌属_sp._CAG:524 Clostridium_sp._CAG:524; 13: 梭状芽胞杆菌属_sp._CAG:1000 Clostridium_sp._CAG:1000; 14: Armatimonadetes_bacterium_C…G2_30_59_28; 15: 普雷沃氏菌属_sp._P3-120 Prevotella_sp._P3-120; 16: Acholeplasma axanthum; 17: Firmicutes_bacterium_CAG:460; 18: 蜡样芽孢杆菌 Bacillus cereus; 19: Uncultured_bacterium_fosmid_pJB16B1; 20: 淡红地深线状菌Geofilum rubicundum.
Fig.2 Differential analysis of top 10% highly abundance of rumen microflora at species level
图3 瘤胃发酵参数与种和属水平相对丰度排名前10细菌的相关关系A: 属水平At genus level; B: 种水平At species level. TVFA:总挥发性脂肪酸 Total volatile fatty acid. 每一对变量之间的相关强度用不同着色和*表示。红色表示正相关,蓝色表示负相关。The correlation strength between each pair of variables was represented by color and *. The red color represented a positive correlation, and the blue color represented a negative correlation; *: P<0.05, **: P<0.01.
Fig.3 Correlation between rumen fermentation parameters and top 10 highly relative abundances of bacterial community at genus and species levels
| 1 | Yang H P. Species and retrieval of oats in China. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1989. |
| 杨海鹏. 我国燕麦属内的种及其检索. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989. | |
| 2 | Jing F, Nan M, Liu Y M, et al. Effects of variety and planting density on yield, quality and disease of forage oat. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3174-3184. |
| 景芳, 南铭, 刘彦明, 等. 品种和种植密度对燕麦饲草产量、品质和病害的影响. 草地学报, 2023, 31(10): 3174-3184. | |
| 3 | Zhou Q P, Hu X W, Wang H, et al. The important role of oat in reinforcing the foundation of food security. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(10): 171-182. |
| 周青平, 胡晓炜, 汪辉, 等. 燕麦在维护国家粮食安全中的重要作用. 草业学报, 2024, 33(10): 171-182. | |
| 4 | Zhou Y L, Du S, Liu H, et al. Effect of pellet feeding system on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality in Wuzhumuqin lamb. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(3): 173-178. |
| 周玉雷, 都帅, 刘昊, 等. 天然牧草干草和草颗粒对乌珠穆沁羔羊生产性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(3): 173-178. | |
| 5 | Ishaq S L, Lachman M M, Wenner B A, et al. Pelleted-hay alfalfa feed increases sheep wether weight gain and rumen bacterial richness over loose-hay alfalfa feed. PLoS One, 2019, 14(6): e0215797. |
| 6 | Zhang X Q, Jin Y M, Yin F X, et al. Effects of nettle cube diet on rumen bacterial community structure, fermentation parameters and growth performance of Tibetan sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(3): 1683-1693. |
| 张晓庆, 金艳梅, 尹凤旭, 等. 荨麻草块饲粮对藏系绵羊瘤胃细菌群落结构、发酵参数及生长性能的影响. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(3): 1683-1693. | |
| 7 | Tang X L. Effectiveness of feeding alfalfa cubes to dairy cows. China Dairy Cattle, 2005(6): 30-31. |
| 汤孝禄. 奶牛饲喂苜蓿草块的效果. 中国奶牛, 2005(6): 30-31. | |
| 8 | Wang Z F, Zhang X Q, Zhong Z M, et al. Effects of oat hay and oat cubes on feeding behavior and production performance of Pengbo semi-fine wool sheep. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 171-179. |
| 王梓凡, 张晓庆, 钟志明, 等. 燕麦草捆和草块对彭波半细毛羊采食行为及生产性能的影响. 草业学报, 2023, 32(5): 171-179. | |
| 9 | Feng Z C, Gao M. Improvement of the method for determining ammonia nitrogen content in rumen fluid by colorimetry. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2010, 31(Z1): 37. |
| 冯宗慈, 高民. 通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2010, 31(Z1): 37. | |
| 10 | Zhang L Y. Feed analysis and quality inspection technology. Beijing: Beiing Kasetsart University Press, 2022. |
| 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2022. | |
| 11 | Trabi E B, Seddik H, Xie F, et al. Comparison of the rumen bacterial community, rumen fermentation and growth performance of fattening lambs fed low-grain, pelleted or non-pelleted high grain total mixed ration. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 253(5): 1-12. |
| 12 | Zeng Y, He M, Cao Z J, et al. Effects of roughage particle size of TMR on chewing activity and rumen fermentation in dairy cows. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(6): 1571-1578. |
| 曾银, 贺鸣, 曹志军, 等. 全混合日粮中粗饲料长度对奶牛咀嚼行为和瘤胃发酵的影响. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(6): 1571-1578. | |
| 13 | Shen Z F, Wang J, Xu J F, et al. Effects of different particle size alfalfa hay on in vitro fermentation characteristics and microbial population of lambs. China Feed, 2024, 21(9): 136-142. |
| 沈振峰, 王静, 徐建风, 等. 不同苜蓿干草粒度饲料对羔羊体外发酵特征和微生物数量的影响. 中国饲料, 2024, 21(9): 136-142. | |
| 14 | Ortega M E, Stern M D, Satter L D. The effect of rumen ammonia concentration on dry matter disappearance in situ. Journal of Dairy Science, 1979, 62(1): 76. |
| 15 | Einarson M S, Plaizier J C, Wittenberg K M. Effects of barley silage chop length on productivity and rumen conditions of lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87(9): 2987-2996. |
| 16 | Newbold C J, Ramos-Morales E. Ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host. Animal, 2020, 14(S1): 78-86. |
| 17 | Liu C, Wu H, Liu S, et al. Dynamic alterations in yak rumen bacteria community and metabolome characteristics in response to feed type. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10(5): 1116. |
| 18 | Li J W, Zhou L, Ma B Y, et al. Effects of dietary non fibrous carbohydrate/neutral detergent fiber on rumen fermentation parameters and flora structure of Tibetan sheep. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(2): 253-259, 275. |
| 李蒋伟, 周力, 马博研, 等. 饲粮非纤维性碳水化合物/中性洗涤纤维对藏羊瘤胃发酵参数及菌群结构的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(2): 253-259, 275. | |
| 19 | Feng Y L. Nutrition of ruminants. Beijing: Science Press, 2004: 5. |
| 冯仰廉. 反刍动物营养学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 5. | |
| 20 | Cho J C, Vergin K L, Morris R M, et al. Lentisphaera araneosa gen. nov, sp. nov, a transparent exopolymer producing marine bacterium, and the description of a novel bacterial phylum, Lentisphaerae. Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 6(6): 611-621. |
| 21 | Martinez-Garcia M, Brazel D M, Swan B K, et al. Capturing single cell genomes of active polysaccharide degraders: an unexpected contribution of Verrucomicrobia. PLoS One, 2012, 7(4): e35314. |
| 22 | Ma X H, Gui R Q, Jiao N, et al. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on rumen bacterial flora structure of Tan sheep under buckwheat straw diet condition. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(4): 2365-2377. |
| 马秀花, 桂瑞麒, 焦娜, 等. 荞麦秸秆饲粮条件下甘露寡糖对滩羊瘤胃菌群结构的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(4): 2365-2377. | |
| 23 | Wang S N, Yang W G, Yin F Q. Effects of fucoidan on rumen microflora and metabolomics of weaned lambs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(3): 1827-1840. |
| 王胜男, 杨伟光, 尹福泉. 岩藻多糖对断奶羔羊瘤胃微生物区系及代谢组学的影响. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(3): 1827-1840. | |
| 24 | Ransom-Jones E, Jones D L, Edwards A, et al. Distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial phylum Fibrobacteres in environments where cellulose degradation occurs. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2014, 37(7): 502-509. |
| 25 | Prajapati V S, Purohit H J, Raje D V, et al. The effect of a high-roughage diet on the metabolism of aromatic compounds by rumen microbes: a metagenomic study using Mehsani buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 100(3): 1319-1331. |
| 26 | Gharechahi J, Vahidi M F, Ding X Z, et al. Temporal changes in microbial communities attached to forages with different lignocellulosic compositions in cattle rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2020, 96(6): 6. |
| 27 | Bao H X, Sagues W J, Wang Y G, et al. Depolymerization of lignin into monophenolics by ferrous/persulfate reagent under mild conditions. ChemSusChem, 2020, 13(24): 6582-6593. |
| 28 | Wang C, Dong D, Wang H S, et al. Metagenomic analysis of microbial consortia enriched from compost: new insights into the role of Actinobacteria in lignocellulose decomposition. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2016, 9(1): 22. |
| [1] | 祁帅, 张艳丽, 万永杰, 牛伟强, 张积鑫, 高雪, 茆达干. 菌酶协同发酵豆秸对湖羊生长性能、血清指标和瘤胃微生物的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 189-201. |
| [2] | 郭楠, 杜鹉辰, 纪守坤, 刘建, 崔素倩, 袁辉, 韩旭, 刘计双, 高立杰. 施肥和补播对山地草甸牧草营养及瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 150-163. |
| [3] | 杨攀平, 李惠侠, 胡亚美. 盐池滩羊肉品质特性及其潜在调控机理探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 223-232. |
| [4] | 郭璟, 王越, 祁存英, 李静. 内生真菌浸种对燕麦生长和根部内生真菌群落的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(1): 151-160. |
| [5] | 王宝, 谢占玲, 郭璟, 唐永鹏, 孟清, 彭清青, 杨家宝, 董德誉, 徐鸿雁, 高太侦, 张凡, 段迎珠. 真菌发酵液浸种燕麦对其抗旱性及根际真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 126-139. |
| [6] | 顾明明, 姜幸慧, 马志毅, 邱水玲, 刘浩宇, 张洺瑞, 卢佳宁, 丘宇俊, 王本治, 甘乾福. 甘薯和芋头在闽东山羊瘤胃中的降解特性及表面附着微生物群落变化[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 169-184. |
| [7] | 关皓, 许多, 李海萍, 贾志锋, 马祥, 刘文辉, 陈有军, 李欣洋, 黄艳玲, 周青平, 陈仕勇. 高寒地区17个燕麦品种营养品质及瘤胃降解特性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 185-198. |
| [8] | 洪莉平, 李小冬, 于二汝, 裴成江, 尚以顺, 骆金红, 孙光, 周云昊, 李世歌, 杨航, 刘凤丹. 不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊血清抗氧化酶活性、瘤胃发酵参数、瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 214-226. |
| [9] | 米春娇, 洪流, 马馼, 毛培胜. 谷胱甘肽引发对老化燕麦种胚线粒体抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 51-59. |
| [10] | 马圆, 刘欢, 赵桂琴, 王敬龙, 张然, 姚瑞瑞. 燕麦sHSP基因家族的鉴定及其响应高温及老化的表达分析[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 145-158. |
| [11] | 杜文盼, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 杨莉, 张建贵, 史怡超, 张官禄. 根系分隔方式对燕麦/豌豆间作地上生物量、土壤养分及根系性状的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 25-36. |
| [12] | 桑瑞娟, 崔超杰, 何云, 张晓霞, 姚晋, 董春阳, 孙浩, 史莹华, 朱晓艳, 李德锋. 豫北地区18个秋播饲用燕麦品种抗倒伏特性及生产性能评价[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 74-85. |
| [13] | 张昭, 伏莹莹, 孙浩文, 孙逢雪, 闫慧芳. 不同品种燕麦种子活力鉴定与耐贮藏性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(6): 165-174. |
| [14] | 申迪, 曾子铭, 庞凯悦, 柴沙驼, 聂洪辛, 李毓敏, 廖扬, 王迅, 黄伟华, 刘书杰, 杨英魁, 王书祥. 低精料日粮和高精料日粮对牦牛生长性能和瘤胃菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 155-165. |
| [15] | 李鸿飞, 周帮伟, 张淼, 施树楠, 李志坚. 不同燕麦品种在呼伦贝尔地区的引种适应性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||