Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 93-107.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025276
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yue-qi LI1(
), Tao MA1, Yu-ping DING1, Ming SU1, Tao LI1, Xiao-ying MA1, Feng-lan MA1, Meng-hu WAN1, Qing-yun LI1, Dan ZHANG1, Na WU1, Ji-li LIU2(
)
Received:2025-07-03
Revised:2025-08-28
Online:2026-06-20
Published:2026-04-13
Contact:
Ji-li LIU
Yue-qi LI, Tao MA, Yu-ping DING, Ming SU, Tao LI, Xiao-ying MA, Feng-lan MA, Meng-hu WAN, Qing-yun LI, Dan ZHANG, Na WU, Ji-li LIU. Adaptation of maize varieties in saline and alkaline land in Ningxia based on growth-nutrient accumulation-yield synergistic regulation[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 93-107.
盐碱梯度 Saline-alkali gradient | 耕层 Till layer (cm) | 全盐含量 Total salt content (g·kg-1) | pH | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱Mildly saline-alkali | 0~20 | 2.87 | 8.62 | 9.76 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 26.23 | 10.11 | 69.08 |
| 20~40 | 2.66 | 8.75 | 13.51 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 42.14 | 5.25 | 63.11 | |
| 中度盐碱Moderately saline-alkali | 0~20 | 5.80 | 8.92 | 9.24 | 0.63 | 0.42 | 36.30 | 4.28 | 136.28 |
| 20~40 | 5.71 | 9.05 | 8.79 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 43.10 | 3.79 | 121.31 |
Table 1 Basic fertility of tested soils
盐碱梯度 Saline-alkali gradient | 耕层 Till layer (cm) | 全盐含量 Total salt content (g·kg-1) | pH | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱Mildly saline-alkali | 0~20 | 2.87 | 8.62 | 9.76 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 26.23 | 10.11 | 69.08 |
| 20~40 | 2.66 | 8.75 | 13.51 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 42.14 | 5.25 | 63.11 | |
| 中度盐碱Moderately saline-alkali | 0~20 | 5.80 | 8.92 | 9.24 | 0.63 | 0.42 | 36.30 | 4.28 | 136.28 |
| 20~40 | 5.71 | 9.05 | 8.79 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 43.10 | 3.79 | 121.31 |
滴灌日期 Drip irrigation date | 灌水量 Quantity of irrigation water (m3·hm-2) | 氮肥用量 Nitrogen fertilizer usage (kg·hm-2) | 磷肥用量 Phosphorus fertilizer usage (kg·hm-2) | 钾肥用量 Potassium fertilizer usage (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4月25日April 25 | 450 | 30.00 | 15.00 | 12.00 |
| 5月20日May 20 | 300 | - | - | - |
| 6月5日June 5 | 450 | 54.00 | 27.00 | 21.60 |
| 6月20日June 20 | 450 | 54.00 | 27.00 | 21.60 |
| 7月5日July 5 | 375 | 36.00 | 18.00 | 14.40 |
| 7月15日July 15 | 375 | 36.00 | 18.00 | 14.40 |
| 7月25日July 25 | 375 | - | - | - |
| 8月7日August 7 | 300 | 45.00 | 22.50 | 18.00 |
| 8月17日August 17 | 300 | 45.00 | 22.50 | 18.00 |
| 8月27日August 27 | 300 | - | - | - |
| 9月7日September 7 | 225 | - | - | - |
Table 2 Experimental irrigation and fertilization scheme
滴灌日期 Drip irrigation date | 灌水量 Quantity of irrigation water (m3·hm-2) | 氮肥用量 Nitrogen fertilizer usage (kg·hm-2) | 磷肥用量 Phosphorus fertilizer usage (kg·hm-2) | 钾肥用量 Potassium fertilizer usage (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4月25日April 25 | 450 | 30.00 | 15.00 | 12.00 |
| 5月20日May 20 | 300 | - | - | - |
| 6月5日June 5 | 450 | 54.00 | 27.00 | 21.60 |
| 6月20日June 20 | 450 | 54.00 | 27.00 | 21.60 |
| 7月5日July 5 | 375 | 36.00 | 18.00 | 14.40 |
| 7月15日July 15 | 375 | 36.00 | 18.00 | 14.40 |
| 7月25日July 25 | 375 | - | - | - |
| 8月7日August 7 | 300 | 45.00 | 22.50 | 18.00 |
| 8月17日August 17 | 300 | 45.00 | 22.50 | 18.00 |
| 8月27日August 27 | 300 | - | - | - |
| 9月7日September 7 | 225 | - | - | - |
Fig.3 Effects of saline-alkali stress on net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), and relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) in leaves of different maize varieties
Fig.4 Effects of saline-alkali stress on maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of PSⅡ and maximum potential photosynthetic capacity (Fv/Fo) of PSⅡ in leaves of different maize varieties
Fig. 5 Effects of saline-alkali stress on superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities, as well as malondialdehyde and proline content in leaves of different maize varieties
Fig.9 Analysis of structural equation model (SEM) and Mantel test correlation test on various indexes of maize under different saline and alkaline stresses
评价指标 Evaluation indicator | 盐碱梯度 Saline-alkali gradient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱 Mildly saline-alkali (QS) | 中度盐碱 Moderately saline-alkali (ZS) | |||||
信息熵值 Information entropy value | 信息效用值 Information utility value | 权重系数 Weight coefficient (Vj,%) | 信息熵值 Information entropy value | 信息效用值 Information utility value | 权重系数 Weight coefficient (Vj, %) | |
| 株高 Plant height | 0.9998 | 0.0002 | 0.32 | 0.9997 | 0.0003 | 0.15 |
| 茎粗 Stem thickness | 0.9992 | 0.0008 | 1.23 | 0.9972 | 0.0028 | 1.58 |
| 叶面积 Leaf area | 0.9968 | 0.0032 | 4.99 | 0.9962 | 0.0038 | 2.17 |
| 单株干物质 Dry matter of per plant | 0.9976 | 0.0024 | 3.75 | 0.9900 | 0.0100 | 5.74 |
| 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate (Pn) | 0.9943 | 0.0057 | 8.78 | 0.9982 | 0.0018 | 1.01 |
| 蒸腾速率Transpiration rate (Tr) | 0.9961 | 0.0039 | 5.95 | 0.9922 | 0.0078 | 4.49 |
| PSⅡ最大光化学效率Fv/Fm | 0.9999 | 0.0001 | 0.18 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.02 |
| PSⅡ潜在最大光合能力Fv/Fo | 0.9991 | 0.0009 | 1.43 | 0.9984 | 0.0016 | 0.90 |
| 相对叶绿素含量SPAD | 0.9998 | 0.0002 | 0.29 | 0.9324 | 0.0676 | 38.82 |
| 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 0.9986 | 0.0014 | 2.19 | 0.9997 | 0.0003 | 0.18 |
| 过氧化物酶POD | 0.9978 | 0.0022 | 3.40 | 0.9995 | 0.0005 | 0.28 |
| 丙二醛MDA | 0.9978 | 0.0022 | 3.41 | 0.9955 | 0.0045 | 2.58 |
| 脯氨酸Pro | 0.9961 | 0.0039 | 5.98 | 0.9993 | 0.0007 | 0.40 |
| Na+ | 0.9942 | 0.0058 | 8.88 | 0.9758 | 0.0242 | 13.91 |
| K+ | 0.9999 | 0.0001 | 0.09 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.03 |
| Na+/K+ | 0.9940 | 0.0060 | 9.28 | 0.9744 | 0.0256 | 14.70 |
| 全氮Total nitrogen | 0.9968 | 0.0032 | 4.89 | 0.9959 | 0.0041 | 2.34 |
| 全磷Total phosphorus | 0.9968 | 0.0032 | 4.89 | 0.9945 | 0.0055 | 3.17 |
| 全钾Total potassium | 0.9871 | 0.0129 | 19.79 | 0.9959 | 0.0041 | 2.34 |
| 穗粒重Kernel weight | 0.9977 | 0.0023 | 3.50 | 0.9975 | 0.0025 | 1.44 |
| 百粒重Hundred-grain weight | 0.9982 | 0.0018 | 2.74 | 0.9992 | 0.0008 | 0.45 |
| 产量Yield | 0.9974 | 0.0026 | 4.04 | 0.9943 | 0.0057 | 3.29 |
Table 3 Results of the entropy method for calculating the weights of various evaluation indicators
评价指标 Evaluation indicator | 盐碱梯度 Saline-alkali gradient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱 Mildly saline-alkali (QS) | 中度盐碱 Moderately saline-alkali (ZS) | |||||
信息熵值 Information entropy value | 信息效用值 Information utility value | 权重系数 Weight coefficient (Vj,%) | 信息熵值 Information entropy value | 信息效用值 Information utility value | 权重系数 Weight coefficient (Vj, %) | |
| 株高 Plant height | 0.9998 | 0.0002 | 0.32 | 0.9997 | 0.0003 | 0.15 |
| 茎粗 Stem thickness | 0.9992 | 0.0008 | 1.23 | 0.9972 | 0.0028 | 1.58 |
| 叶面积 Leaf area | 0.9968 | 0.0032 | 4.99 | 0.9962 | 0.0038 | 2.17 |
| 单株干物质 Dry matter of per plant | 0.9976 | 0.0024 | 3.75 | 0.9900 | 0.0100 | 5.74 |
| 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate (Pn) | 0.9943 | 0.0057 | 8.78 | 0.9982 | 0.0018 | 1.01 |
| 蒸腾速率Transpiration rate (Tr) | 0.9961 | 0.0039 | 5.95 | 0.9922 | 0.0078 | 4.49 |
| PSⅡ最大光化学效率Fv/Fm | 0.9999 | 0.0001 | 0.18 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.02 |
| PSⅡ潜在最大光合能力Fv/Fo | 0.9991 | 0.0009 | 1.43 | 0.9984 | 0.0016 | 0.90 |
| 相对叶绿素含量SPAD | 0.9998 | 0.0002 | 0.29 | 0.9324 | 0.0676 | 38.82 |
| 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 0.9986 | 0.0014 | 2.19 | 0.9997 | 0.0003 | 0.18 |
| 过氧化物酶POD | 0.9978 | 0.0022 | 3.40 | 0.9995 | 0.0005 | 0.28 |
| 丙二醛MDA | 0.9978 | 0.0022 | 3.41 | 0.9955 | 0.0045 | 2.58 |
| 脯氨酸Pro | 0.9961 | 0.0039 | 5.98 | 0.9993 | 0.0007 | 0.40 |
| Na+ | 0.9942 | 0.0058 | 8.88 | 0.9758 | 0.0242 | 13.91 |
| K+ | 0.9999 | 0.0001 | 0.09 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.03 |
| Na+/K+ | 0.9940 | 0.0060 | 9.28 | 0.9744 | 0.0256 | 14.70 |
| 全氮Total nitrogen | 0.9968 | 0.0032 | 4.89 | 0.9959 | 0.0041 | 2.34 |
| 全磷Total phosphorus | 0.9968 | 0.0032 | 4.89 | 0.9945 | 0.0055 | 3.17 |
| 全钾Total potassium | 0.9871 | 0.0129 | 19.79 | 0.9959 | 0.0041 | 2.34 |
| 穗粒重Kernel weight | 0.9977 | 0.0023 | 3.50 | 0.9975 | 0.0025 | 1.44 |
| 百粒重Hundred-grain weight | 0.9982 | 0.0018 | 2.74 | 0.9992 | 0.0008 | 0.45 |
| 产量Yield | 0.9974 | 0.0026 | 4.04 | 0.9943 | 0.0057 | 3.29 |
品种 Variety | 盐碱梯度Saline-alkali gradient | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱Mildly saline-alkali (QS) | 中度盐碱Moderately saline-alkali (ZS) | |||||||
| Di+ | Di– | Ci | 排序Sort | Di+ | Di– | Ci | 排序Sort | |
| V1 | 253.692 | 22.644 | 0.082 | 10 | 137.182 | 66.647 | 0.327 | 6 |
| V2 | 224.490 | 145.104 | 0.393 | 5 | 172.868 | 74.382 | 0.301 | 7 |
| V3 | 28.384 | 258.770 | 0.901 | 1 | 58.757 | 142.824 | 0.709 | 2 |
| V4 | 178.959 | 93.895 | 0.344 | 6 | 157.753 | 33.981 | 0.177 | 10 |
| V5 | 92.319 | 181.434 | 0.663 | 2 | 70.901 | 169.652 | 0.705 | 3 |
| V6 | 164.882 | 108.060 | 0.396 | 4 | 147.558 | 48.007 | 0.245 | 8 |
| V7 | 214.819 | 106.859 | 0.332 | 7 | 83.032 | 112.283 | 0.575 | 4 |
| V8 | 234.166 | 104.554 | 0.309 | 8 | 87.944 | 113.723 | 0.564 | 5 |
| V9 | 214.268 | 75.386 | 0.260 | 9 | 151.994 | 44.420 | 0.226 | 9 |
| V10 | 126.808 | 146.005 | 0.535 | 3 | 57.601 | 157.887 | 0.733 | 1 |
Table 4 Adaptation analysis of varieties with different saline-alkali gradients based on comprehensive TOPSIS evaluation
品种 Variety | 盐碱梯度Saline-alkali gradient | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱Mildly saline-alkali (QS) | 中度盐碱Moderately saline-alkali (ZS) | |||||||
| Di+ | Di– | Ci | 排序Sort | Di+ | Di– | Ci | 排序Sort | |
| V1 | 253.692 | 22.644 | 0.082 | 10 | 137.182 | 66.647 | 0.327 | 6 |
| V2 | 224.490 | 145.104 | 0.393 | 5 | 172.868 | 74.382 | 0.301 | 7 |
| V3 | 28.384 | 258.770 | 0.901 | 1 | 58.757 | 142.824 | 0.709 | 2 |
| V4 | 178.959 | 93.895 | 0.344 | 6 | 157.753 | 33.981 | 0.177 | 10 |
| V5 | 92.319 | 181.434 | 0.663 | 2 | 70.901 | 169.652 | 0.705 | 3 |
| V6 | 164.882 | 108.060 | 0.396 | 4 | 147.558 | 48.007 | 0.245 | 8 |
| V7 | 214.819 | 106.859 | 0.332 | 7 | 83.032 | 112.283 | 0.575 | 4 |
| V8 | 234.166 | 104.554 | 0.309 | 8 | 87.944 | 113.723 | 0.564 | 5 |
| V9 | 214.268 | 75.386 | 0.260 | 9 | 151.994 | 44.420 | 0.226 | 9 |
| V10 | 126.808 | 146.005 | 0.535 | 3 | 57.601 | 157.887 | 0.733 | 1 |
品种 Variety | 盐碱梯度Saline-alkali gradient | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱Mildly saline-alkali (QS) | 中度盐碱Moderately saline-alkali (ZS) | |||||||
| PC1 | PC2 | 得分Score | 排序Sort | PC1 | PC2 | 得分Score | 排序Sort | |
| V1 | -1.4011 | -0.8839 | -0.57 | 10 | 0.9180 | -1.5923 | -0.04 | 5 |
| V2 | -0.3346 | -1.1385 | -0.29 | 8 | -1.2373 | 0.2730 | -0.30 | 9 |
| V3 | 0.0840 | 2.0281 | 0.36 | 2 | 0.3917 | 0.5700 | 0.22 | 2 |
| V4 | -0.3682 | 0.5838 | -0.01 | 6 | 0.3430 | 0.3262 | 0.16 | 4 |
| V5 | 1.2385 | 0.1816 | 0.40 | 1 | 1.0677 | -0.5338 | 0.20 | 3 |
| V6 | -0.1208 | 1.0732 | 0.14 | 5 | -0.7325 | -0.4030 | -0.28 | 8 |
| V7 | 1.4352 | -0.9784 | 0.27 | 4 | -0.1586 | -1.1259 | -0.26 | 7 |
| V8 | -1.0334 | -0.2630 | -0.36 | 9 | -1.7272 | 0.5723 | -0.38 | 6 |
| V9 | -0.7450 | -0.1072 | -0.24 | 7 | -0.1486 | -0.0643 | -0.05 | 10 |
| V10 | 1.2455 | -0.4958 | 0.29 | 3 | 1.2839 | 1.9779 | 0.73 | 1 |
Table 5 Adaptation analysis of varieties with different saline-alkali gradients based on comprehensive principal component evaluation
品种 Variety | 盐碱梯度Saline-alkali gradient | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 轻度盐碱Mildly saline-alkali (QS) | 中度盐碱Moderately saline-alkali (ZS) | |||||||
| PC1 | PC2 | 得分Score | 排序Sort | PC1 | PC2 | 得分Score | 排序Sort | |
| V1 | -1.4011 | -0.8839 | -0.57 | 10 | 0.9180 | -1.5923 | -0.04 | 5 |
| V2 | -0.3346 | -1.1385 | -0.29 | 8 | -1.2373 | 0.2730 | -0.30 | 9 |
| V3 | 0.0840 | 2.0281 | 0.36 | 2 | 0.3917 | 0.5700 | 0.22 | 2 |
| V4 | -0.3682 | 0.5838 | -0.01 | 6 | 0.3430 | 0.3262 | 0.16 | 4 |
| V5 | 1.2385 | 0.1816 | 0.40 | 1 | 1.0677 | -0.5338 | 0.20 | 3 |
| V6 | -0.1208 | 1.0732 | 0.14 | 5 | -0.7325 | -0.4030 | -0.28 | 8 |
| V7 | 1.4352 | -0.9784 | 0.27 | 4 | -0.1586 | -1.1259 | -0.26 | 7 |
| V8 | -1.0334 | -0.2630 | -0.36 | 9 | -1.7272 | 0.5723 | -0.38 | 6 |
| V9 | -0.7450 | -0.1072 | -0.24 | 7 | -0.1486 | -0.0643 | -0.05 | 10 |
| V10 | 1.2455 | -0.4958 | 0.29 | 3 | 1.2839 | 1.9779 | 0.73 | 1 |
| [1] | Zhao H Y, Lin H X. Molecular mechanism of plants in responses to salt and alkali stress. Soils and Crops, 2020, 9(2): 103-113. |
| 赵怀玉, 林鸿宣. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的分子机制. 土壤与作物, 2020, 9(2): 103-113. | |
| [2] | Wang C J, Li F X, Wu X. Effects of different organic materials on soil nutrient content and nitrogen effectiveness in saline soils of Yinbei irrigation district. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(23): 141-142, 153. |
| 王长军, 李凤霞, 吴霞. 不同有机物料对银北灌区盐碱地土壤养分含量及氮有效性的影响. 现代农业科技, 2021(23): 141-142, 153. | |
| [3] | Ren X Y, Chen Y Y, Liang X H. Effect of Fenlong tillage on soil nutrients and maize yield in saline land of Ningxia Yinbei irrigation area. Southwest Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 35(5): 1063-1068. |
| 任晓月, 陈彦云, 梁新华. 粉垄耕作对宁夏银北盐碱地土壤养分及玉米产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(5): 1063-1068. | |
| [4] | Li C C, Song Y, Sun D Q. Seedling growth difference and physiological mechanism of different maize cultivars under mixed saline-alkali stress. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(10): 2486-2493. |
| 李聪聪, 宋勇, 孙东泉. 不同品种玉米在盐碱复合胁迫下的幼苗生长差异及其生理机制. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2486-2493. | |
| [5] | Weng H Y, Wu M Y, Li X B, et al. High-throughput phenotyping salt tolerance in JUNCAOs by combining prompt chlorophyll a fluorescence with hyperspectral spectroscopy. Plant Science, 2023, 330: 111660. |
| [6] | Chun Y, Li X Y, Yuan Y, et al. Overview of the impact of salinity-alkali stress on quinoa’s physiological, biochemical, and metabolic levels. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 45(4): 67-77. |
| 春宇, 李向颖, 元元, 等. 盐碱胁迫对藜麦生理生化及代谢水平的影响综述. 农业科学研究, 2024, 45(4): 67-77. | |
| [7] | Ruan Y H, Zhang Z X, Wang L Q, et al. Effect of NaCl stress on seedling physiological indices of different maize varieties. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(3): 44-46. |
| 阮英慧, 张卓新, 王丽琼, 等. 氯化钠胁迫对不同玉米品种苗期生理指标的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(3): 44-46. | |
| [8] | Zhang H. Effects of deep-turning straw return on growth, development and yield of maize in saline and alkaline land. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2023. |
| 张皓. 深翻秸秆还田对盐碱地玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2023. | |
| [9] | Su M, Li F G, Hong Z Q, et al. Study on the antioxidant properties of nitrogen application in alleviating heat-induced premature senescence in dryland potatoes after flowering. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 58(4): 660-675. |
| 苏明, 李翻过, 洪自强, 等. 施氮缓解旱地马铃薯花后高温早衰的抗氧化特性研究. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 660-675. | |
| [10] | Li Y P, Xu Z H, Lin Y N, et al. Research progress on the physiological and molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in maize. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 51(12): 1-10. |
| 李懿璞, 许政晗, 蔺雅楠, 等. 玉米耐盐生理与分子机制研究进展. 广东农业科学, 2024, 51(12): 1-10. | |
| [11] | He K H, Chang L G, Cui T T, et al. QTL localization of maize plant height and ear height in multiple environments. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 49(8): 1443-1452. |
| 何坤辉, 常立国, 崔婷婷, 等. 多环境下玉米株高和穗位高的QTL定位. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(8): 1443-1452. | |
| [12] | Wang X T, Wei F, Dai Z J, et al. Identification of candidate genes associating with stem diameter in maize (Zea mays L.) based on integrating QTL mapping and RNA-seq. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(6): 1737-1745. |
| 王新涛, 魏锋, 代资举, 等.基于QTL定位和RNA-seq分析挖掘玉米茎粗候选基因. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(6): 1737-1745. | |
| [13] | Ding X P, Bai J, Zhang C Y, et al. Effects of row expansion and plant reduction on canopy structure and yield of summer maize populations. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 53(19): 3915-3927. |
| 丁相鹏, 白晶, 张春雨, 等. 扩行缩株对夏玉米群体冠层结构及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3915-3927. | |
| [14] | Sun Q, Hu J J. Research techniques in plant physiology. Yangling: Northwest A&F University Press, 2006. |
| 孙群, 胡景江. 植物生理学研究技术. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学出版社, 2006. | |
| [15] | Wang J, Huang W J, Yao S Y, et al. Characteristics of ion distribution, uptake and transport in poplar trees at different growth stages and their relationship with soil salinity. Northwest Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 34(1): 140-152. |
| 王杰, 黄文娟, 姚诗雨, 等. 不同生长阶段胡杨树离子分布、吸收和运移特征及其与土壤盐分的关系.西北农业学报, 2025, 34(1): 140-152. | |
| [16] | Bao S D. Soil agrochemical analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. |
| 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.北京:中国农业出版社, 2000. | |
| [17] | Zhang F, Chen M R, Xing Y Y, et al. Optimization of potato fertilization and drip irrigation volume combinations based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2023, 29(4): 732-744. |
| 张帆, 陈梦茹, 邢英英, 等. 基于熵权法和TOPSIS对马铃薯施肥和滴灌量组合的优化. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(4): 732-744. | |
| [18] | Yang X J, Li X Y, Wang H Y, et al. Screening of salt-tolerant germplasm and evaluation of salt tolerance in maize inbred lines. Maize Science, 2014, 22(4): 19-25. |
| 杨晓杰, 李旭业, 王海艳, 等. 玉米自交系耐盐种质的筛选及耐盐性评价. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(4): 19-25. | |
| [19] | Liu X J. Agronomic traits, yield and quality performance of cereals with different phosphorus efficiencies under coordinated fertilization with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2022. |
| 刘晓杰. 不同磷效率谷子在氮磷钾统筹施肥下农艺性状、产量及品质表现. 太原: 山西农业大学, 2022. | |
| [20] | Chang S Q, Deng Q Y, Wu J. Progress in the characterization of photosynthesis and material accumulation in super hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 2014, 29(1): 1-5. |
| 常硕其, 邓启云, 吴俊. 超级杂交稻光合作用和物质积累特性研究进展. 杂交水稻, 2014, 29(1): 1-5. | |
| [21] | Chen C, He X D, Qin J Z, et al. Comparison of Fv/Fm characteristics in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of four Michelia species. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2013, 40(1): 32-37. |
| 陈辰, 何小定, 秦金舟, 等. 4种含笑叶片叶绿素荧光参数Fv/Fm特性的比较. 安徽农业大学学报, 2013, 40(1): 32-37. | |
| [22] | Zhang X J, Zhou F P, Zhang Y Z, et al. Differential analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of glutinous sorghum during flag leaf fertility. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(12): 1270-1273. |
| 张晓娟, 周福平, 张一中, 等. 糯高粱旗叶生育期间叶绿素荧光特性差异分析. 山西农业科学, 2014, 42(12): 1270-1273. | |
| [23] | Zhou L B. Response of yield and physiological indexes to planting density of introduced maize varieties based on the Tibetan Plateau. Nyingchi: Tibet Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, 2023. |
| 周丽斌. 基于西藏高原引进玉米品种产量及生理指标对种植密度的响应. 林芝: 西藏农牧大学, 2023. | |
| [24] | Song J L, Qin J M, Xiong H Y, et al. Effects of adding different substrates on physiological characteristics of corn seedlings in tetracycline-containing soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2): 342-349. |
| 宋建丽, 秦俊梅, 熊华烨, 等. 添加不同基质对含四环素土壤玉米幼苗生理特性的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2): 342-349. | |
| [25] | Teng X Y, Li P Z, Lin X Y, et al. Effects of alkaline salt stress on mineral ion uptake and partitioning in rice seedlings. Northeast Agricultural Science, 2022, 47(1): 11-16. |
| 滕祥勇, 李鹏志, 林秀云, 等. 碱性盐胁迫对水稻苗期矿质离子吸收与分配的影响. 东北农业科学, 2022, 47(1): 11-16. | |
| [26] | Wang H. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and development of maize and product quality. Henan Agriculture, 2025, 36(6): 70-72. |
| 王慧.浅析氮肥对玉米生长发育及产品质量的影响. 河南农业, 2025, 36(6): 70-72. | |
| [27] | Zhou X Z, Tang C Y. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on agronomic traits and plant nutrients of fall corn. Henan Agricultural Science, 2008, 37(9): 27-29, 33. |
| 周晓舟, 唐创业. 氮磷钾对秋玉米农艺性状和植株养分的影响. 河南农业科学, 2008, 37(9): 27-29, 33. | |
| [28] | Sun M Y, Ji M, Li C Q, et al. Yield differences among modern corn varieties and typical biological characteristics of high-yielding corn varieties. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2025, 31(2): 226-237. |
| 孙梦宇, 纪萌, 李长青, 等. 现代玉米品种的产量差异及高产玉米品种的典型生物学特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2025, 31(2): 226-237. | |
| [29] | Peng Y M, Zhao K N, Li S, et al. Effects of wheat-corn cropping systems and nitrogen fertilizer application rates on corn yield and nitrogen use efficiency in dryland wheat-corn double-cropping areas. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2025, 31(1): 63-76. |
| 彭彦珉, 赵凯男, 李爽, 等. 麦季耕作方式和玉米季氮肥用量对旱地麦-玉两熟区玉米产量和氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2025, 31(1): 63-76. | |
| [30] | Miao Z M, Li J C, Chen D. Evaluation of water level management schemes for winter wheat under waterlogged conditions based on the entropy-weighted TOPSIS model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Machinery Engineering, 2018, 36(12): 1306-1311. |
| 缪子梅, 李竞春, 陈栋. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型评价涝渍条件下冬小麦水位管理方案. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(12): 1306-1311. | |
| [31] | Zhao S T, Shi S L, Li X L, et al. Application of TOPSIS based on entropy weight to screen soil sustainable systems suitable for corn rotation in the arid region of central Gansu. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(4): 997-1005. |
| 赵思腾, 师尚礼, 李小龙, 等. 基于熵权-TOPSIS模型筛选陇中旱作区适宜玉米轮作的土壤可持续系统. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 997-1005. | |
| [32] | Li H, Wang X M, Liu M, et al. Optimization of water and nitrogen reduction schemes based on summer corn yield and nitrogen utilization. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(5): 1292-1304. |
| 李慧, 王旭敏, 刘苗, 等. 基于夏玉米产量和氮素利用的水氮减量方案优选. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1292-1304. | |
| [33] | Guo F C, Gou R L, She Y M F, et al. Study on the adaptability of different salt-tolerant rice varieties to saline-alkali soils in Ningxia. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2026, 91(2): 24-33. https://doi.org/10.13207/j.jnwafu.2026.02.003. |
| 郭富城, 苟瑞丽, 舍杨梦斐, 等. 不同耐盐水稻品种对宁夏盐碱地的适应性研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 91(2): 24-33. https://doi.org/10.13207/j.jnwafu.2026.02.003. |
| [1] | Bo SUN, Jun-yi ZHANG, Chun-yan BAI, Fan FENG, Jian LAN, Jian-qiang DENG. Production benefit analysis of annual forage rotation systems in an arid area of central Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 35-48. |
| [2] | Shao-yan YUAN, Yuan-kun LIU, Shi-jie CAI, Ting-xin LEI, Ping-ping ZHOU, Jun-zhen WANG, Hong-hai YAN. Comprehensive evaluation of the salt tolerance of diverse oat germplasm at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 49-59. |
| [3] | Zhi-hao LIU, Wen-long LI, Chen ZHANG, Mei-ying LIU, Ya TAO. Effects of silage additives on the quality of whole crop maize silage produced from plants irrigated with livestock wastewater [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 60-72. |
| [4] | Yu-lin NIU, Ming-fang BAO, Wen-hu WANG, Xin CHEN, Kai-qiang LIU, Wen-hui LIU, Yan QIN. A multivariate evaluation of agronomic traits, yield and seed production in ten accessions of Bromus inermis from the Three-River-Source Region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 83-92. |
| [5] | Ling-fei XIANG, Feng-ju ZHANG, Yue LI, Xue-qin WANG, Jin-long LIU, Qiao-li MA. Effects of varied row spacings and sowing rates on forage and seed yield and quality of Echinochloa frumentacea in saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(5): 126-138. |
| [6] | Long-hang CHAI, Rui ZHAO, Xiao-yi LIU, Jin-shun BAI. A meta-analysis of the effects of green manure on yield increase and chemical nitrogen fertilizer saving in Chinese farmlands [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(5): 162-174. |
| [7] | Wen-hui DENG, Xiao-na ZHAO, Jia-yi YONG, Si-yu GUAN, Guo-qiang HU, Teng-fei WANG, Hai-ying HU. Effects of intercropping oat with different densities on alfalfa seed yield and its constituent factors [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 100-111. |
| [8] | Ju-feng FAN, Lang PAN, De-jun PENG, Ya-jun PENG, Si-fu LI, Cheng-yin NONG, Jian-hao DU, Xiang-ying LIU, Guo-lan MA. Effects of barnyardgrass on rice growth and yield traits, and determination of its economic control threshold [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 124-134. |
| [9] | Chao-rong LIU, Yong-cheng CHEN, Ying CHEN, Xu-dong ZHANG, Tian-yu HU, Li-he SU, Fan-fan ZHANG, Xu-zhe WANG, Kun YAO, Chun-hui MA. Differences in saline-alkali tolerance of five Leymus chinensis cultivars grown in saline-alkali soil from Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 29-41. |
| [10] | Yi-bo WANG, Xue-hua MING, Jian-yong ZHANG, Qi YUAN, Jian-ming DU, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Yi-yin ZHANG, Jian LAN, Le MU. Multi-trait evaluation of the production performance and seed yield of new oat germplasm materials in the arid area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 86-99. |
| [11] | Lei LI, Yong-kuan MA, Peng JIANG, Zhi-ming ZHU, Li-dong JI, Long LI, Xing XU. Effects of a ‘six-aspect integrated’ pattern on dynamic changes in soil water and salt contents, quality of cultivated land, and silage maize productivity in saline-alkali land in the Ningxia irrigation area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 68-82. |
| [12] | Jia-yi ZANG, Ming-jie XU, Ji-cheng XIE, Yu-ying SHEN, Xing-fa LAI. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizer at equivalent nitrogen levels on forage yield and water use efficiency in a silage maize/forage soybean intercropping system in dryland areas [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 83-95. |
| [13] | Zhao-ming WANG, Li-na ZHENG, Yue-hua ZHANG, Wei ZHAO, Xiang CHEN, Zhen-yu JIA. Bacterial community assembly in the rhizosphere and endosphere of different perennial alfalfa varieties with low fall dormancy rates [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 195-207. |
| [14] | Yang-kun LI, Zhuan-lin BEN, Jun-yu ZHANG, Hui-min YANG. A meta-analysis on the effect of fertilizer type on alfalfa seed yield under various climate and soil conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 54-67. |
| [15] | Kong-tao WEI, Chun-ping ZHANG, Yang YU, Zheng-she ZHANG, Ze ZHOU, Xue ZHANG, Xin-xin WANG, Si-yu YUE, Quan CAO, Quan-min DONG. Yield performance, nutritional quality, and soil physicochemical responses of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars in the Qinghai Lake-Gonghe Basin region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 107-118. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||