草业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 19-32.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023097
韩其飞1,2(), 尹龙1, 李超凡1(), 张润钢1, 王文彪3, 崔正南3
收稿日期:
2023-04-03
修回日期:
2023-05-29
出版日期:
2024-01-20
发布日期:
2023-11-23
通讯作者:
李超凡
作者简介:
E-mail: lcf@nuist.edu.cn基金资助:
Qi-fei HAN1,2(), Long YIN1, Chao-fan LI1(), Run-gang ZHANG1, Wen-biao WANG3, Zheng-nan CUI3
Received:
2023-04-03
Revised:
2023-05-29
Online:
2024-01-20
Published:
2023-11-23
Contact:
Chao-fan LI
摘要:
在全球气候变化的背景下,干旱半干旱区草地作为陆地生态系统中重要且非常脆弱的组分之一,显现出一系列生态问题。探究气候变化及人类活动对于该区草地生态系统净初级生产力(NPP)的影响,对于合理利用自然资源,保持农牧业可持续发展具有重要的意义。施肥作为促进作物生长的一种方式,合理施肥也可以提高退化草地的NPP。基于此,本研究拟以天山北坡沿海拔梯度分布的4种草地类型:高山草甸(AM)、中山森林草甸(MMFM)、低山干草原(LMDG)和平原荒漠草原(PDG)为研究对象,基于反硝化-分解模型(DNDC)分析该区典型草地生态系统净初级生产力对施加不同氮肥的响应,并揭示施肥阈值及最优施肥方式。结果表明:1)适度氮肥添加促进了各个类型草地生态系统NPP的增长,但草地NPP对施肥量的响应存在阈值,且不存在适用于4种草地类型的统一最优施肥方式。LMDG草地生态系统对施氮肥的响应最敏感。2)PDG草地NPP达到最大的施肥方式为一年分两次施加100 kg·hm-2硝酸盐,NPP的最大值为68.72 g C·m-2·a-1。LMDG草地NPP最大的施肥方式为一年分两次施加尿素260 kg·hm-2,NPP的最大值为263.28 g C·m-2·a-1。MMFM草地生态系统达到NPP最大的施肥方式为一年一次施尿素80 kg·hm-2,NPP的最大值为171.22 g C·m-2·a-1。无水氨作为在AM草地中反应最好的氮肥,以最小的施肥量(60 kg·hm-2)达到了NPP的最大值(114.62 g C·m-2·a-1)。3)通过蒙特卡洛不确定分析的结果显示,施肥时间对PDG和LMDG的影响更为明显,施肥量波动对LMDG和MMFM的影响较其他两种草地更为明显。
韩其飞, 尹龙, 李超凡, 张润钢, 王文彪, 崔正南. 天山北坡典型草地施肥阈值及不确定性分析[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(1): 19-32.
Qi-fei HAN, Long YIN, Chao-fan LI, Run-gang ZHANG, Wen-biao WANG, Zheng-nan CUI. Nitrogen fertilizer threshold and uncertainty analysis of typical grassland on the northern slopes of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 19-32.
图1 天山北坡草地类型PDG: 平原荒漠草原Plain desert grassland; LMDG: 低山干草原Low mountain dry grassland; MMFM: 中山森林草甸Mid-mountain forest meadow; AM: 高山草甸Alpine meadow. 下同The same below.
Fig.1 Typical grassland on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains
图3 4种草地类型对不同施肥措施的响应NPP: 净初级生产力Net primary productivity. 下同The same below.
Fig.3 Responses of different grassland types to varied fertilization measures
草地类型 Grassland types | 施肥阈值Nitrogen fertilizer threshold (kg·hm-2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素Urea | 无水氨Anhydrous ammonia | 碳酸氢铵Ammonium bicarbonate | 硝酸盐Nitrate | 铵Ammonium | ||||||
T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | |
PDG | 60 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
LMDG | 160 | 260 | 120 | 160 | 100 | 160 | 100 | 160 | 100 | 160 |
MMFM | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 80 | 60 | 80 | 60 | 100 |
AM | 80 | 120 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 120 | 60 | 120 | 100 | 120 |
表1 不同草地类型氮肥阈值
Table 1 Nitrogen fertilizer threshold for different grassland types
草地类型 Grassland types | 施肥阈值Nitrogen fertilizer threshold (kg·hm-2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素Urea | 无水氨Anhydrous ammonia | 碳酸氢铵Ammonium bicarbonate | 硝酸盐Nitrate | 铵Ammonium | ||||||
T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | |
PDG | 60 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
LMDG | 160 | 260 | 120 | 160 | 100 | 160 | 100 | 160 | 100 | 160 |
MMFM | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 80 | 60 | 80 | 60 | 100 |
AM | 80 | 120 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 120 | 60 | 120 | 100 | 120 |
施肥阈值 Fertilization threshold (kg·hm-2) | 氮肥类型 Nitrogen fertilizer type | 研究区 Study area | 草地类型/草种 Grassland type/grass species | 参考文献 References |
---|---|---|---|---|
60 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 河北省张家口市北部坝上高原区Bashang grasslands district, north of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province | 主要牧草为羊草The main forage is Leymus chinensis | [ |
260 | 尿素Urea (N≥46.4%) | 伊犁新垦区建植混播人工草地Establishment of mixed planting artificial grassland in Yili new reclamation area | 百脉根+扁穗冰草+新麦草+无芒雀麦Lotus corniculatus+Agropyron cristatum+Psathyrostachys juncea+Bromus inermis | [ |
225 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 青藏高原的中东部、玉树州东部的称多县Chindu county in the east of Yushu Prefecture and the east of Qinghai Tibet plateau | 冬季草场Winter grassland | [ |
150 | 磷酸二铵Diammonium phosphate (N 18%) | 三江源国家自然保护区Sanjiangyuan national nature reserve | 早熟禾人工草地Poa pratensis artificial grassland | [ |
126 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 东祁连山金强河流域的甘肃农业大学天祝高山草原生态系统试验站Tianzhu alpine grassland ecosystem experimental station of Gansu Agricultural University in Jinqiang river basin of east Qilian mountains | 嵩草草甸和高寒灌丛草甸、燕麦Kobresia meadows and alpine shrub meadows, Avena sativa | [ |
132 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 青海省大武镇Dawu town, Qinghai province | 高寒嵩草草甸Alpine Kobresia meadow | [ |
240 | 颗粒状尿素 Granular urea (N 46%) | 吉林省松原市长岭县东北师范大学草地科学研究所实验站Institute of Grassland Science, Northeast Normal University, Changling county, Songyuan city, Jilin province | 松嫩平原西南部自然草地、羊草Natural grassland in the southwest of Songnen Plain, L. chinensis | [ |
225 | 硫酸钾复合肥(总养分含量 ≥45%,其 中 N∶P2O5∶K2O 为1∶1∶1)Potassium sulfate compound fertilizer (total nutrient content ≥45%, in which N∶P2O5∶K2O is 1∶1∶1) | 四川省红原县瓦切乡四川省草原科学研究院试验站Experimental station of Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences, Waqie township, Hongyuan county, Sichuan province | 高寒改良草地Alpine improved grassland | [ |
420 | 尿素Urea (N 40%) | 青海省海北藏族自治州海晏县境内哈勒景乡永丰村的冬春围栏草地Fenced grassland in winter and spring in Yongfeng village, Halejing township, Haiyan county, Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Qinghai province | 山地草原类天然草场Natural mountain grassland | [ |
300 | 速效氮肥尿素Quick acting nitrogen fertilizer urea | 江西现代牧业科技园百草园基地(江西省蚕桑茶叶研究所)Jiangxi Sericulture and Tea Research Institute | 以狗牙根、雀稗、车前草为主的杂类草草地A mixed grass grassland mainly composed of Cynodon dactylon,Paspalum thunbergii and Plantago depressa | [ |
179 | 硝酸铵Ammonium nitrate | 大庆市学伟大街两侧绿化带草坪内In the green belt lawn on both sides of Xuewei street, Daqing city | 早熟禾P. pratensis | [ |
50 | 尿素Urea | 内蒙古锡林浩特市锡林河流域的退化典型草原Degenerated typical grassland in Xilin river basin, Xilinhot city, Inner Mongolia | 禾本科植物占绝对优势,克氏针茅为建群优势种Poaceae plants account for absolute advantage, Stipa krylovii is the dominant species for group building | [ |
120 | 尿素Urea | 宁夏盐池县城西滩试验田Xitan experimental field in Yanchi county, Ningxia | 羊草L. chinensis | [ |
300 | 尿素Urea | 三江源区高寒草甸Alpine meadow in Sanjiangyuan district | 高山嵩草杂类草甸,主要优势牧草是高山嵩草Alpine meadow, with the main dominant species being Kobresia pygmaea | [ |
表2 基于文献综述的不同草地类型施肥阈值
Table 2 Fertilization threshold for different grassland types based on literature review
施肥阈值 Fertilization threshold (kg·hm-2) | 氮肥类型 Nitrogen fertilizer type | 研究区 Study area | 草地类型/草种 Grassland type/grass species | 参考文献 References |
---|---|---|---|---|
60 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 河北省张家口市北部坝上高原区Bashang grasslands district, north of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province | 主要牧草为羊草The main forage is Leymus chinensis | [ |
260 | 尿素Urea (N≥46.4%) | 伊犁新垦区建植混播人工草地Establishment of mixed planting artificial grassland in Yili new reclamation area | 百脉根+扁穗冰草+新麦草+无芒雀麦Lotus corniculatus+Agropyron cristatum+Psathyrostachys juncea+Bromus inermis | [ |
225 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 青藏高原的中东部、玉树州东部的称多县Chindu county in the east of Yushu Prefecture and the east of Qinghai Tibet plateau | 冬季草场Winter grassland | [ |
150 | 磷酸二铵Diammonium phosphate (N 18%) | 三江源国家自然保护区Sanjiangyuan national nature reserve | 早熟禾人工草地Poa pratensis artificial grassland | [ |
126 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 东祁连山金强河流域的甘肃农业大学天祝高山草原生态系统试验站Tianzhu alpine grassland ecosystem experimental station of Gansu Agricultural University in Jinqiang river basin of east Qilian mountains | 嵩草草甸和高寒灌丛草甸、燕麦Kobresia meadows and alpine shrub meadows, Avena sativa | [ |
132 | 尿素Urea (N 46%) | 青海省大武镇Dawu town, Qinghai province | 高寒嵩草草甸Alpine Kobresia meadow | [ |
240 | 颗粒状尿素 Granular urea (N 46%) | 吉林省松原市长岭县东北师范大学草地科学研究所实验站Institute of Grassland Science, Northeast Normal University, Changling county, Songyuan city, Jilin province | 松嫩平原西南部自然草地、羊草Natural grassland in the southwest of Songnen Plain, L. chinensis | [ |
225 | 硫酸钾复合肥(总养分含量 ≥45%,其 中 N∶P2O5∶K2O 为1∶1∶1)Potassium sulfate compound fertilizer (total nutrient content ≥45%, in which N∶P2O5∶K2O is 1∶1∶1) | 四川省红原县瓦切乡四川省草原科学研究院试验站Experimental station of Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences, Waqie township, Hongyuan county, Sichuan province | 高寒改良草地Alpine improved grassland | [ |
420 | 尿素Urea (N 40%) | 青海省海北藏族自治州海晏县境内哈勒景乡永丰村的冬春围栏草地Fenced grassland in winter and spring in Yongfeng village, Halejing township, Haiyan county, Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Qinghai province | 山地草原类天然草场Natural mountain grassland | [ |
300 | 速效氮肥尿素Quick acting nitrogen fertilizer urea | 江西现代牧业科技园百草园基地(江西省蚕桑茶叶研究所)Jiangxi Sericulture and Tea Research Institute | 以狗牙根、雀稗、车前草为主的杂类草草地A mixed grass grassland mainly composed of Cynodon dactylon,Paspalum thunbergii and Plantago depressa | [ |
179 | 硝酸铵Ammonium nitrate | 大庆市学伟大街两侧绿化带草坪内In the green belt lawn on both sides of Xuewei street, Daqing city | 早熟禾P. pratensis | [ |
50 | 尿素Urea | 内蒙古锡林浩特市锡林河流域的退化典型草原Degenerated typical grassland in Xilin river basin, Xilinhot city, Inner Mongolia | 禾本科植物占绝对优势,克氏针茅为建群优势种Poaceae plants account for absolute advantage, Stipa krylovii is the dominant species for group building | [ |
120 | 尿素Urea | 宁夏盐池县城西滩试验田Xitan experimental field in Yanchi county, Ningxia | 羊草L. chinensis | [ |
300 | 尿素Urea | 三江源区高寒草甸Alpine meadow in Sanjiangyuan district | 高山嵩草杂类草甸,主要优势牧草是高山嵩草Alpine meadow, with the main dominant species being Kobresia pygmaea | [ |
草地类型 Grassland types | NPP峰值 NPP peak value (g C·m-2·a-1) | 达到峰值的施肥方式 Optimal fertilization methods |
---|---|---|
PDG | 68.72 | 硝酸盐/一年两施Nitrate/fertilize twice a year |
LMDG | 263.28 | 尿素/一年两施Urea/fertilize twice a year |
MMFM | 171.22 | 尿素/一年一施Urea/fertilize once a year |
AM | 114.62 | 无水氨/一年一施Anhydrous ammonia/fertilize once a year |
表3 不同草地类型最优施肥方式
Table 3 Optimal fertilization methods for different grassland types
草地类型 Grassland types | NPP峰值 NPP peak value (g C·m-2·a-1) | 达到峰值的施肥方式 Optimal fertilization methods |
---|---|---|
PDG | 68.72 | 硝酸盐/一年两施Nitrate/fertilize twice a year |
LMDG | 263.28 | 尿素/一年两施Urea/fertilize twice a year |
MMFM | 171.22 | 尿素/一年一施Urea/fertilize once a year |
AM | 114.62 | 无水氨/一年一施Anhydrous ammonia/fertilize once a year |
1 | Fan J W, Zhong H P, Chen L B, et al. Some scientific problems of grassland degradation in arid and semi-arid regions in Northern China. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 158(5): 95-101. |
樊江文, 钟华平, 陈立波, 等. 我国北方干旱和半干旱区草地退化的若干科学问题. 中国草地学报, 2007, 158(5): 95-101. | |
2 | Pan Q M, Xue J G, Tao J, et al. Current status of grassland degradation and measures for grassland restoration in northern China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(17): 1642-1650. |
潘庆民, 薛建国, 陶金, 等. 中国北方草原退化现状与恢复技术. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17): 1642-1650. | |
3 | Jiang L. Responds of Songnen grassland photosynthetic characteristics to warming and nitrogen addition. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2012. |
蒋丽. 松嫩草地光合特性对增温和氮素施加的响应. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2012. | |
4 | Chen Y M, Zhang J Y, Xu X, et al. Effects of different irrigation and fertilization practices on nitrogen leaching in facility vegetable production in northeastern China. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 210: 165-170. |
5 | Wang J, Wang S S, Qiao X G, et al. Influence of nitrogen addition on the primary production in Nei Mongol degraded grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(10): 980-990. |
王晶, 王姗姗, 乔鲜果, 等. 氮素添加对内蒙古退化草原生产力的短期影响. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(10): 980-990. | |
6 | Xu Z W, Wan S Q, Ren H Y, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen addition on species turnover in temperate grasslands in Northern China. PLoS One, 2017, 7(6): 0039762. |
7 | Chang J F, Ciais P, Viovy N, et al. Effect of climate change, CO2 trends, nitrogen addition, and land-cover and management intensity changes on the carbon balance of European grasslands. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22(1): 338-350. |
8 | Liu X M, Zheng H Y, Li X F. Phenological characteristics of main plants in desert steppe on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains in response to climate change. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2022, 266(3): 51-57. |
刘秀梅, 郑红玉, 李小锋. 天山北坡荒漠草原主要植物物候特征对气候变化的响应. 草学, 2022, 266(3): 51-57. | |
9 | Peng K B, Han Q F, Li C F, et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition and climate change on NPP of typical grasslands on the northern slopes of Tianshan Mountain. Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 13(2): 242-251. |
彭开兵, 韩其飞, 李超凡, 等. 天山北坡典型草地净初级生产力对氮沉降及气候变化的响应阈值研究. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 13(2): 242-251. | |
10 | Klaus V H, Schäfer D, Prati D, et al. Effects of mowing, grazing and fertilization on soil seed banks in temperate grasslands in Central Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 256: 211-217. |
11 | Zhang Z. Study on partitioned management of soil nitrogen and fertilization model establishment based on GIS. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015. |
张泽. 基于GIS的土壤氮素分区管理与施肥模型建立研究. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2015. | |
12 | Li C S, Frolking S, Frolking T A. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1992, 97(D9): 9759-9776. |
13 | Ito A, Sasai T. A comparison of simulation results from two terrestrial carbon cycle models using three climate data sets. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2006, 58(5): 513-522. |
14 | Sincock A M, Wheater H S, Whitehead P G. Calibration and sensitivity analysis of a river water quality model under unsteady flow conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 277(3/4): 214-229. |
15 | Yan Q B. Monte Carlo method for estimation on parameters of river water quality. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2006(10): 14-16. |
严齐斌. 河流水质参数估计的蒙特卡罗方法. 水利水电技术, 2006(10): 14-16. | |
16 | Tümay A B, Brouwer R. Nonmarket valuation of water quality in a rural transition economy in Turkey applying an a posteriori bid design. Water Resources Research, 2007, DOI: 10.1029/2006WR004869. |
17 | Arabi M, Govindaraju R S, Engel B, et al. Multiobjective sensitivity analysis of sediment and nitrogen processes with a watershed model. Water Resources Research, 2007, DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005463. |
18 | Wang X, Lv X G, Bai S Y, et al. Probability and threshold values for recognizing eutrophication in Lake Songhua. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006(12): 3989-3997. |
王霞, 吕宪国, 白淑英, 等. 松花湖富营养化发生的阈值判定和概率分析. 生态学报, 2006(12): 3989-3997. | |
19 | Lei T S. Current situation, potential and countermeasures of grassland resources in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Xumuye, 1993(3): 23-25. |
雷特生. 新疆草地资源现状、潜力及对策. 新疆畜牧业, 1993(3): 23-25. | |
20 | Yin X J, Zhu H H, Gerry G, et al. Effects of climate change and human activities on net primary productivity in the northern slope of Tianshan, Xinjiang. China Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(20): 195-202. |
尹小君, 祝宏辉, Gerry G, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对天山北坡净初级生产力变化的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(20): 195-202. | |
21 | Li H M, Bahejiayinaer T, Chang S L, et al. Spatial-temporal variations in the past 30 years and prediction analysis of vegetation coverage in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(12): 2414-2423. |
李红梅, 巴贺贾依娜尔·铁木尔别克, 常顺利, 等. 天山北坡植被覆盖近30年时空变化及预测分析. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(12): 2414-2423. | |
22 | Gao J, Yin X J, Wang C J, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution of NPP and its climatic driving factors in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(2): 352-361. |
高军, 尹小君, 汪传建, 等. 天山北坡植被NPP时空格局及气候因子驱动分析. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(2): 352-361. | |
23 | Hou L P, He P, Fan X S, et al. A review on the methods of determining ecological thresholds. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(2): 711-718. |
侯利萍, 何萍, 范小杉, 等. 生态阈值确定方法综述. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 711-718. | |
24 | Chen Q L, Li Z, Li J P, et al. Study on fertilization effect and recommendation for Bashang grassland based on “3412” field trials. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2020, 35(2): 191-197. |
陈奇乐, 李智, 李瑾璞, 等. 基于“3414”试验的坝上草地施肥效应与推荐施肥量研究. 林业与生态科学, 2020, 35(2): 191-197. | |
25 | Zhang X Z, Li X S, Lan J Y, et al. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on yield, quality and economic feature of mixture pasture. Grassland and Turf, 2014, 34(4): 56-60. |
张学洲, 李学森, 兰吉勇, 等. 氮磷钾施肥量对混播草地产量, 品质和经济效益的影响. 草原与草坪, 2014, 34(4): 56-60. | |
26 | De K J. Effect of fertilization on primary productivity and soil nutrients of alpine meadow in Three River Source Region. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2014. |
德科加. 施肥对三江源区高寒草甸初级生产力和土壤养分的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2014. | |
27 | Min X X. Effect of sheep manure on growth of Poa pratensis L. cv. Qinghai and soil of grassland. Xining: Qinghai University, 2014. |
闵星星. 羊粪对青海草地早熟禾生长及草地土壤的影响. 西宁: 青海大学, 2014. | |
28 | Pu X P. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on oat trait and soil enzyme activity in alpine region. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2005. |
蒲小鹏. 氮肥对高寒地区燕麦草地生产性能及土壤酶活性的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005. | |
29 | Sun J J, Wang P B, Xu C L, et al. Effects of fertilization levels on natural grassland of Guoluo Alpine Meadow. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(4): 25-30. |
孙金金, 汪鹏斌, 徐长林, 等. 不同施肥水平对果洛高寒草甸草地的影响. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(4): 25-30. | |
30 | Li X T. Effect of fertilization and clipping on productivity and species diversity in Leymus chinensis grassland. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2016. |
李晓彤. 施肥和刈割对羊草草地生产力与物种多样性的影响. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2016. | |
31 | Fu P B, Gan Y M, Zhang H X, et al. Effect of fertilization on the forage production and quality of alpine grassland. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(7): 1137-1142. |
符佩斌, 干友民, 张洪轩, 等. 施肥对高寒草甸产草量和品质的影响. 草业科学, 2015, 32(7): 1137-1142. | |
32 | De K J, Zhou Q P, Xu C T, et al. Effect of fertilization on aboveground biomass of mountain meadow in Qinghai province. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2010(3): 38-40. |
德科加, 周青平, 徐成体, 等. 施肥对青海省山地草原类草场地上生物量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(3): 38-40. | |
33 | Yu H Y, Dai Z H, Yu X G, et al. Effect of topdressing nitrogen fertilizer on natural grassland yield increase. Jiangxi Journal of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2020(5): 51-54. |
余华阳, 戴征煌, 于徐根, 等. 追施氮肥对天然草地的增产作用与效果. 江西畜牧兽医杂志, 2020(5): 51-54. | |
34 | Zhang J L. Effect of NH4NO3 treatment on growth and chlorophyll content of Poa pratensis. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(5): 83-86, 92. |
张吉立. 不同硝酸铵处理对草地早熟禾叶绿素含量及生长的影响. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(5): 83-86, 92. | |
35 | Du Q F. The responses of degraded typical steppe vegetation soil to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in Inner Mongolia. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017. |
杜青峰. 内蒙古退化典型草原植被和土壤对氮磷肥配施的响应. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017. | |
36 | Dong X B, Hao M D, Guo S A, et al. Fertilization effects on hay yield and quality of Leymus chinensis. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(10): 1935-1942. |
董晓兵, 郝明德, 郭胜安, 等. 施肥对羊草产量和品质的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(10): 1935-1942. | |
37 | Ka Z C R, De K J, Xu C T. The effects of different fertilizer times and nitrogen levels on biomass and soil nutrients in alpine meadow. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(4): 726-732. |
卡着才让, 德科加, 徐成体. 不同施肥时间及施氮水平对高寒草甸生物量和土壤养分的影响. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 726-732. | |
38 | Gruner D S, Smith J E, Seabloom E W, et al. A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11(7): 740-755. |
39 | Xiong L L, Deng X H, Ji L L, et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition on carbon storage of Alnus cremastogyne ecosystem was simulated with different frequency of nitrogen addition. Ecological Science, 2022, 41(5): 28-34. |
熊露露, 邓小红, 姬拉拉, 等. 不同氮素添加频率模拟氮沉降对桤木人工林生态系统碳储量的影响. 生态科学, 2022, 41(5): 28-34. | |
40 | Tian Y. Effects of nitrogen application on nitrogen loss and rice nitrogen threshold in rice field. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2017. |
田艳. 施氮对水稻田氮流失影响及水稻氮阈值研究. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2017. | |
41 | Zhu J. Effect of nitrogen application levels on ammonia volatilization and its mechanisms in typical double cropping paddy field of southern hills region. Changsha: Central South University, 2013. |
朱坚. 中南丘陵区典型双季稻田氨挥发对施氮量的响应及阈值初探. 长沙: 中南大学, 2013. | |
42 | Zhang W W. The effect of nitrogen application rate on ammonia volatilization & the study of nitrogen fertilizer threshold in paddy field. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2015. |
张维维. 稻田氨挥发对施氮量的响应及氮肥阈值初探. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2015. | |
43 | Hao X Y, Zhou B K, Ma X Z, et al. Characteristics of crop yield and nutrient balance under different long-term fertilization practices in black soil. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(16): 178-185. |
郝小雨, 周宝库, 马星竹, 等. 长期不同施肥措施下黑土作物产量与养分平衡特征. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(16): 178-185. | |
44 | Zong N, Shi P L, Jiang J, et al. Effects of fertilization and grazing exclosure on vegetation recovery in a degraded alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2013, 19(6): 905-913. |
宗宁, 石培礼, 蒋婧, 等. 施肥和围栏封育对退化高寒草甸植被恢复的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2013, 19(6): 905-913. |
[1] | 王瑞泾, 冯琦胜, 金哲人, 刘洁, 赵玉婷, 葛静, 梁天刚. 青藏高原退化草地的恢复潜势研究[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6): 11-22. |
[2] | 王亚晖, 唐文家, 李森, 赵鸿雁, 谢家丽, 马超, 颜长珍. 青海省草地生产力变化及其驱动因素[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 1-13. |
[3] | 林慧龙, 范迪, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚. 草地综合顺序分类法研究新热点:2008-2020年回顾与展望[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(10): 201-213. |
[4] | 崔博超, 郑江华, 吐尔逊·哈斯木, 段素素, 杜梦洁. 塔里木河流域草地净初级生产力时空分异特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 1-13. |
[5] | 崔雨萱, 孙宗玖, 刘慧霞, 董乙强. 短期封育对蒿类荒漠草地现存生物量及植物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 17-26. |
[6] | 乌尼图, 刘桂香, 杨勇, 宋向阳, 白海花. 基于光能利用率模型的内蒙古天然草原植被净初级生产力动态监测与气候因子的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 1-10. |
[7] | 刘洁, 孟宝平, 葛静, 高金龙, 殷建鹏, 侯蒙京, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚. 基于CASA模型和MODIS数据的甘南草地NPP时空动态变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(6): 19-32. |
[8] | 王多斌, 籍常婷, 林慧龙. 基于DNDC模型的高寒草甸土壤有机碳含量动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 197-204. |
[9] | 郭丁, 郭文斐, 赵建, 特木其勒图, 李旭东, 傅华, 骆亦其. 黄土高原草地和农田系统碳动态对降雨、温度和CO2浓度变化响应的模拟[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 1-14. |
[10] | 耿元波, 王松, 胡雪荻. 高寒草甸草原净初级生产力对气候变化响应的模拟[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(1): 1-13. |
[11] | 王梦佳, 孙睿, 刘喆, 辛晓平, 刘刚, 张蕾, 乔晨. 基于遥感数据的呼伦贝尔草原放牧强度研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(6): 28-36. |
[12] | 张颖, 章超斌, 王钊齐, 杨悦, 张艳珍, 李建龙, 安如. 气候变化与人为活动对三江源草地生产力影响的定量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 1-14. |
[13] | 陈奕兆, 李建龙, 孙政国, 刚成诚. 欧亚大陆草原带1982-2008年间净初级生产力时空动态及其对气候变化响应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(1): 1-12. |
[14] | 王松, 耿元波, 母悦. 典型草原净初级生产力对气候变化响应的模拟[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(12): 4-13. |
[15] | 刚成诚, 王钊齐, 杨悦, 陈奕兆, 张艳珍, 李建龙, 程积民. 近百年全球草地生态系统净初级生产力时空动态对气候变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11): 1-14. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||