草业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 105-117.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021417
韩重阳(), 王栓, 左粟田, 闫三博, 汪阳, 蔡家邦, 马骢毓, 张新全, 聂刚()
收稿日期:
2021-11-15
修回日期:
2021-12-31
出版日期:
2022-11-20
发布日期:
2022-10-01
通讯作者:
聂刚
作者简介:
E-mail: nieg17@sicau.edu.cn基金资助:
Chong-yang HAN(), Shuan WANG, Su-tian ZUO, San-bo YAN, Yang WANG, Jia-bang CAI, Cong-yu MA, Xin-quan ZHANG, Gang NIE()
Received:
2021-11-15
Revised:
2021-12-31
Online:
2022-11-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Contact:
Gang NIE
摘要:
为筛选出适宜在成都平原推广种植的优质白三叶品种,对10个白三叶引进品种进行了物候期、干草产量、生长高度、茎粗、叶面积等指标的生产性能评价,并对其进行营养品质测定。结果表明,引进品种‘金宝’的物候期最长,可达306 d,为晚熟品种。各供试白三叶品种在返青第一次刈割后生长速度最快,达0.52~0.67 cm·d-1,随后两次刈割后日均生长速度放缓,第3茬刈割后生长速度最慢,为0.34~0.50 cm·d-1。各品种中‘罗特’年度平均干草产量最高,达14436.44 kg·hm-2,较对照品种‘海法’‘胡依阿’分别增产20.0%、26.7%(P<0.05)。‘欧米克’年平均干草产量为8898.64 kg·hm-2,显著低于对照品种‘海法’‘胡依阿’(P<0.05)。各参试白三叶品种的生长高度、拉伸高度为22.6~30.2 cm、35.4~53.7 cm,‘罗特’的叶面积、茎粗和茎节数最大,‘超级胡依阿’的生殖枝长度,‘金宝’的叶柄长度和 ‘海法’的叶柄粗均在参试白三叶品种中表现最优。对10个品种的粗蛋白等营养成分进行测定,结果表明,不同白三叶品种间差异较大,引进品种‘游侠’的粗蛋白含量最高,可达 22.8%。应用灰色关联度分析方法对10个白三叶品种的干草产量及相关农艺性状进行综合比较分析,‘罗特’‘超级胡依阿’和‘金宝’田间性状表现较优,适宜在成都平原地区推广种植利用。
韩重阳, 王栓, 左粟田, 闫三博, 汪阳, 蔡家邦, 马骢毓, 张新全, 聂刚. 10个白三叶品种在成都平原的生产性能评价[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 105-117.
Chong-yang HAN, Shuan WANG, Su-tian ZUO, San-bo YAN, Yang WANG, Jia-bang CAI, Cong-yu MA, Xin-quan ZHANG, Gang NIE. An evaluation of suitability of ten Trifolium repens varieties for use on the Chengdu Plain[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 105-117.
编号No. | 品种Varieties | 来源地Origins | 种子来源Seed source |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 胡依阿Huia | 新西兰New Zealand | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
2 | 海法Haifa | 澳大利亚Australia | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
3 | 罗特Rampart | 美国America | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
4 | 超级胡依阿Super Huia | 澳大利亚Australia | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
5 | 超级海法Super Haifa | 澳大利亚Australia | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
6 | 游侠Ranger | 新西兰New Zealand | 北京猛犸种业有限公司Beijing Mammoth Seed Company |
7 | 欧米克OMK | 新西兰New Zealand | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
8 | 麦克MAG | 阿根廷Argentina | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
9 | 艾丽丝Alice | 美国America | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
10 | 金宝Jumbo | 美国America | 丹农匹克公司DLF Pickseed |
表1 供试材料信息
Table 1 Information of test materials
编号No. | 品种Varieties | 来源地Origins | 种子来源Seed source |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 胡依阿Huia | 新西兰New Zealand | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
2 | 海法Haifa | 澳大利亚Australia | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
3 | 罗特Rampart | 美国America | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
4 | 超级胡依阿Super Huia | 澳大利亚Australia | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
5 | 超级海法Super Haifa | 澳大利亚Australia | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
6 | 游侠Ranger | 新西兰New Zealand | 北京猛犸种业有限公司Beijing Mammoth Seed Company |
7 | 欧米克OMK | 新西兰New Zealand | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
8 | 麦克MAG | 阿根廷Argentina | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
9 | 艾丽丝Alice | 美国America | 北京正道生态科技有限公司Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
10 | 金宝Jumbo | 美国America | 丹农匹克公司DLF Pickseed |
品种 Varieties | 播种期 Seeding stage | 出苗期 Seeding emergence stage | 分枝期 Branching stage | 现蕾期 Squaring stage | 初花期 Showing budding stage | 盛花期 Flowering stage | 结荚期 Fruiting stage | 成熟期 Mature stage | 物候期 Growth period (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 9-20 | 9-28 | 10-19 | 3-23 | 4-8 | 5-31 | 6-5 | 7-2 | 284 |
海法Haifa | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-19 | 3-23 | 4-11 | 6-5 | 6-13 | 7-7 | 289 |
罗特Rampart | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-18 | 3-25 | 4-15 | 6-6 | 6-17 | 7-12 | 294 |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-18 | 3-27 | 4-11 | 6-3 | 6-10 | 7-6 | 288 |
超级海法Super Haifa | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-19 | 3-31 | 4-14 | 6-7 | 6-17 | 7-11 | 293 |
游侠Ranger | 9-20 | 9-28 | 10-17 | 3-28 | 4-16 | 6-7 | 6-16 | 7-9 | 291 |
欧米克OMK | 9-20 | 9-29 | 10-20 | 3-30 | 4-15 | 6-5 | 6-14 | 7-10 | 292 |
麦克MAG | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-20 | 3-29 | 4-15 | 6-6 | 6-16 | 7-12 | 294 |
艾丽丝Alice | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-19 | 3-29 | 4-16 | 6-8 | 6-17 | 7-13 | 295 |
金宝Jumbo | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-18 | 3-27 | 4-21 | 6-17 | 6-25 | 7-24 | 306 |
表2 供试白三叶品种物候期观测
Table 2 The different development stages of tested white clover variety (Month-day)
品种 Varieties | 播种期 Seeding stage | 出苗期 Seeding emergence stage | 分枝期 Branching stage | 现蕾期 Squaring stage | 初花期 Showing budding stage | 盛花期 Flowering stage | 结荚期 Fruiting stage | 成熟期 Mature stage | 物候期 Growth period (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 9-20 | 9-28 | 10-19 | 3-23 | 4-8 | 5-31 | 6-5 | 7-2 | 284 |
海法Haifa | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-19 | 3-23 | 4-11 | 6-5 | 6-13 | 7-7 | 289 |
罗特Rampart | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-18 | 3-25 | 4-15 | 6-6 | 6-17 | 7-12 | 294 |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-18 | 3-27 | 4-11 | 6-3 | 6-10 | 7-6 | 288 |
超级海法Super Haifa | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-19 | 3-31 | 4-14 | 6-7 | 6-17 | 7-11 | 293 |
游侠Ranger | 9-20 | 9-28 | 10-17 | 3-28 | 4-16 | 6-7 | 6-16 | 7-9 | 291 |
欧米克OMK | 9-20 | 9-29 | 10-20 | 3-30 | 4-15 | 6-5 | 6-14 | 7-10 | 292 |
麦克MAG | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-20 | 3-29 | 4-15 | 6-6 | 6-16 | 7-12 | 294 |
艾丽丝Alice | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-19 | 3-29 | 4-16 | 6-8 | 6-17 | 7-13 | 295 |
金宝Jumbo | 9-20 | 9-27 | 10-18 | 3-27 | 4-21 | 6-17 | 6-25 | 7-24 | 306 |
图1 供试白三叶品种不同刈割茬次的生长速度1:胡依阿 Huia; 2:海法 Haifa; 3:罗特 Rampart; 4:超级胡依阿 Super Huia; 5:超级海法 Super Haifa; 6:游侠 Ranger; 7:欧米克 OMK; 8:麦克 MAG; 9:艾丽丝 Alice; 10:金宝 Jumbo.不同小写字母表示不同品种间差异显著(P<0.05),下同。Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different varieties (P<0.05), the same below.
Fig.1 Growth rate of the tested white clover varieties with different cutting stubble times
编号 No. | 2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 平均 Average | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1茬 First cutting | 第2茬 Second cutting | 第3茬 Third cutting | 第4茬 Fourth cutting | 总计 Total | 第1茬 First cutting | 第2茬 Second cutting | 第3茬 Third cutting | 第4茬 Fourth cutting | 总计Total | ||
1 | 2263.55± 356.86cde | 4585.50± 261.35bc | 2245.79± 514.51a | 1983.88± 357.79a | 11078.71± 455.21d | 2900.48± 216.34bc | 4621.35± 538.45bcd | 2537.71± 190.98b | 1643.78± 175.59ab | 11703.32± 590.71bc | 11391.02± 515.31d |
2 | 3198.84± 169.66abc | 4836.16± 93.65bc | 2249.25± 113.86a | 1098.83± 20.04ab | 11383.08± 219.95d | 3650.03± 322.87ab | 5362.75± 795.16ab | 2430.91± 94.35b | 1213.36± 21.83cd | 12657.05± 469.00bc | 12020.06± 261.86c |
3 | 3257.45± 132.82abc | 5559.14± 379.46abc | 3272.03± 550.95a | 1542.72± 337.13ab | 13631.33± 517.62a | 4097.38± 195.99a | 6527.33± 196.75a | 3255.11± 115.11a | 1361.73± 87.50bc | 15241.56± 191.27a | 14436.44± 242.98a |
4 | 2743.51± 337.52bcd | 5830.17± 671.99ab | 2129.29± 681.98a | 1667.33± 562.17ab | 12370.31± 259.70ab | 3226.99± 145.58ab | 4995.11± 411.95bc | 2797.75± 195.67ab | 1352.15± 169.20bc | 12372.00± 575.97bc | 12371.15± 222.75ab |
5 | 3391.85± 534.61ab | 6744.58± 657.24a | 2019.59± 630.26a | 869.00± 80.74ab | 13025.03± 487.20a | 3708.97± 849.34ab | 5136.38± 176.49ab | 2651.00± 176.41ab | 1717.72± 176.94ab | 13214.07± 758.68b | 13119.54± 148.63a |
6 | 1066.50± 156.38f | 5371.02± 432.89abc | 2384.18± 674.46a | 763.13± 65.06b | 9584.83± 611.09e | 1980.53± 104.03c | 3148.51± 372.58d | 2219.54± 251.27b | 919.81± 17.04d | 8268.38± 654.67e | 8926.60± 358.87e |
7 | 1302.95± 347.98ef | 4288.09± 691.68c | 1921.41± 442.50a | 1358.03± 417.67ab | 8870.49± 1046.62e | 1536.61± 255.97c | 3538.22± 374.66cd | 2450.74± 323.22b | 1401.23± 79.92bc | 8926.79± 663.83de | 8898.64± 775.24e |
8 | 3981.58± 371.89a | 4469.92± 442.55bc | 2500.78± 396.37a | 1198.15± 368.18ab | 12150.43± 766.17ab | 3260.54± 196.28ab | 4732.68± 422.91bc | 2897.10± 195.67ab | 1638.79± 133.74ab | 12529.11± 374.65bc | 12339.76± 211.21ab |
9 | 1812.35± 140.64def | 4936.50± 59.56bc | 3533.01± 155.35a | 1212.15± 454.75ab | 11494.01± 472.08d | 2582.81± 96.90bc | 4874.61± 595.46bc | 2691.08± 283.68ab | 1418.05± 108.80bc | 11566.55± 620.30bc | 11530.28± 287.47cd |
10 | 2962.77± 399.91abc | 4377.76± 134.47bc | 2558.27± 406.50a | 1763.81± 115.51ab | 11662.60± 559.50cd | 3202.76± 360.27ab | 4454.33± 408.96bcd | 2267.97± 228.30b | 1837.61± 84.19a | 11762.66± 971.01bc | 11712.64± 435.15cd |
表3 供试白三叶品种干草产量
Table 3 Hay forage yield of different white clover varieties (kg·hm-2)
编号 No. | 2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 平均 Average | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1茬 First cutting | 第2茬 Second cutting | 第3茬 Third cutting | 第4茬 Fourth cutting | 总计 Total | 第1茬 First cutting | 第2茬 Second cutting | 第3茬 Third cutting | 第4茬 Fourth cutting | 总计Total | ||
1 | 2263.55± 356.86cde | 4585.50± 261.35bc | 2245.79± 514.51a | 1983.88± 357.79a | 11078.71± 455.21d | 2900.48± 216.34bc | 4621.35± 538.45bcd | 2537.71± 190.98b | 1643.78± 175.59ab | 11703.32± 590.71bc | 11391.02± 515.31d |
2 | 3198.84± 169.66abc | 4836.16± 93.65bc | 2249.25± 113.86a | 1098.83± 20.04ab | 11383.08± 219.95d | 3650.03± 322.87ab | 5362.75± 795.16ab | 2430.91± 94.35b | 1213.36± 21.83cd | 12657.05± 469.00bc | 12020.06± 261.86c |
3 | 3257.45± 132.82abc | 5559.14± 379.46abc | 3272.03± 550.95a | 1542.72± 337.13ab | 13631.33± 517.62a | 4097.38± 195.99a | 6527.33± 196.75a | 3255.11± 115.11a | 1361.73± 87.50bc | 15241.56± 191.27a | 14436.44± 242.98a |
4 | 2743.51± 337.52bcd | 5830.17± 671.99ab | 2129.29± 681.98a | 1667.33± 562.17ab | 12370.31± 259.70ab | 3226.99± 145.58ab | 4995.11± 411.95bc | 2797.75± 195.67ab | 1352.15± 169.20bc | 12372.00± 575.97bc | 12371.15± 222.75ab |
5 | 3391.85± 534.61ab | 6744.58± 657.24a | 2019.59± 630.26a | 869.00± 80.74ab | 13025.03± 487.20a | 3708.97± 849.34ab | 5136.38± 176.49ab | 2651.00± 176.41ab | 1717.72± 176.94ab | 13214.07± 758.68b | 13119.54± 148.63a |
6 | 1066.50± 156.38f | 5371.02± 432.89abc | 2384.18± 674.46a | 763.13± 65.06b | 9584.83± 611.09e | 1980.53± 104.03c | 3148.51± 372.58d | 2219.54± 251.27b | 919.81± 17.04d | 8268.38± 654.67e | 8926.60± 358.87e |
7 | 1302.95± 347.98ef | 4288.09± 691.68c | 1921.41± 442.50a | 1358.03± 417.67ab | 8870.49± 1046.62e | 1536.61± 255.97c | 3538.22± 374.66cd | 2450.74± 323.22b | 1401.23± 79.92bc | 8926.79± 663.83de | 8898.64± 775.24e |
8 | 3981.58± 371.89a | 4469.92± 442.55bc | 2500.78± 396.37a | 1198.15± 368.18ab | 12150.43± 766.17ab | 3260.54± 196.28ab | 4732.68± 422.91bc | 2897.10± 195.67ab | 1638.79± 133.74ab | 12529.11± 374.65bc | 12339.76± 211.21ab |
9 | 1812.35± 140.64def | 4936.50± 59.56bc | 3533.01± 155.35a | 1212.15± 454.75ab | 11494.01± 472.08d | 2582.81± 96.90bc | 4874.61± 595.46bc | 2691.08± 283.68ab | 1418.05± 108.80bc | 11566.55± 620.30bc | 11530.28± 287.47cd |
10 | 2962.77± 399.91abc | 4377.76± 134.47bc | 2558.27± 406.50a | 1763.81± 115.51ab | 11662.60± 559.50cd | 3202.76± 360.27ab | 4454.33± 408.96bcd | 2267.97± 228.30b | 1837.61± 84.19a | 11762.66± 971.01bc | 11712.64± 435.15cd |
品种 Varieties | 自然高度 Growth height (cm) | 拉伸高度 Stretching height (cm) | 生殖枝长 Fertile stem length (cm) | 叶柄长 Petiole length (cm) | 叶柄粗 Petiole diameter (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 24.9±0.52c | 40.5±2.67bc | 8.1±1.67b | 19.9±1.58bc | 1.44±0.02abcd |
海法Haifa | 28.6±0.80ab | 41.2±3.80bc | 7.3±2.24b | 20.2±1.38bc | 1.80±0.05a |
罗特Rampart | 30.2±0.41a | 53.7±4.37a | 10.4±1.38ab | 24.1±2.95b | 1.69±0.09abc |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 28.2±0.55b | 40.6±4.30bc | 16.1±3.25a | 20.9±0.99bc | 1.24±0.16d |
超级海法Super Haifa | 28.8±0.65ab | 40.7±4.49bc | 6.8±2.40b | 19.1±1.83bc | 1.60±0.17abcd |
游侠Ranger | 23.1±0.43cd | 37.9±2.78c | 13.2±1.28ab | 17.1±1.23c | 1.31±0.09cd |
欧米克OMK | 22.6±0.73d | 39.6±2.10c | 15.8±1.95a | 17.4±0.48c | 1.34±0.08bcd |
麦克MAG | 29.9±0.43ab | 35.4±1.53c | 11.8±2.96ab | 19.8±2.62bc | 1.72±0.22ab |
艾丽丝Alice | 24.4±0.30cd | 35.6±3.11c | 9.4±2.85ab | 20.4±1.70bc | 1.61±0.06abcd |
金宝Jumbo | 30.1±0.77ab | 50.4±2.69ab | 15.6±1.54a | 36.2±2.65a | 1.67±0.05abc |
品种 Varieties | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 茎节数 Numbers of stem nodes (No.) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (mm2) |
胡依阿Huia | 2.36±0.10ab | 4.8±0.58ab | 3.63±0.06bc | 2.76±0.08bc | 2083.33±141.67bcd |
海法Haifa | 2.37±0.16ab | 5.0±0.94ab | 4.13±0.17a | 3.13±0.20ab | 2302.00±116.05ab |
罗特Rampart | 2.78±0.08a | 6.8±0.46a | 4.03±0.08b | 3.36±0.28a | 2599.67±105.39a |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 2.35±0.09ab | 5.2±0.37ab | 3.16±0.03de | 2.53±0.03cd | 1692.66±29.78de |
超级海法Super Haifa | 2.62±0.21ab | 5.6±0.81ab | 3.96±0.14b | 2.83±0.03bc | 1934.61±45.93bcd |
游侠Ranger | 2.24±0.14b | 3.6±0.40b | 2.66±0.26fg | 2.06±0.14de | 916.62±58.33f |
欧米克OMK | 2.56±0.09ab | 4.0±0.44b | 2.26±0.06g | 2.00±0.15e | 625.00±38.18f |
麦克MAG | 2.61±0.15ab | 4.6±0.40ab | 3.63±0.17bc | 2.76±0.03bc | 2141.31±176.51bc |
艾丽丝Alice | 2.38±0.15ab | 4.4±0.67ab | 2.90±0.11ef | 2.46±0.12cde | 1524.92±69.48e |
金宝Jumbo | 2.73±0.05a | 5.4±0.40ab | 3.46±0.13cd | 2.93±0.29abc | 1841.73±274.19cde |
表4 供试白三叶品种的农艺性状
Table 4 The agronomic traits related to yield of different white clover varieties
品种 Varieties | 自然高度 Growth height (cm) | 拉伸高度 Stretching height (cm) | 生殖枝长 Fertile stem length (cm) | 叶柄长 Petiole length (cm) | 叶柄粗 Petiole diameter (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 24.9±0.52c | 40.5±2.67bc | 8.1±1.67b | 19.9±1.58bc | 1.44±0.02abcd |
海法Haifa | 28.6±0.80ab | 41.2±3.80bc | 7.3±2.24b | 20.2±1.38bc | 1.80±0.05a |
罗特Rampart | 30.2±0.41a | 53.7±4.37a | 10.4±1.38ab | 24.1±2.95b | 1.69±0.09abc |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 28.2±0.55b | 40.6±4.30bc | 16.1±3.25a | 20.9±0.99bc | 1.24±0.16d |
超级海法Super Haifa | 28.8±0.65ab | 40.7±4.49bc | 6.8±2.40b | 19.1±1.83bc | 1.60±0.17abcd |
游侠Ranger | 23.1±0.43cd | 37.9±2.78c | 13.2±1.28ab | 17.1±1.23c | 1.31±0.09cd |
欧米克OMK | 22.6±0.73d | 39.6±2.10c | 15.8±1.95a | 17.4±0.48c | 1.34±0.08bcd |
麦克MAG | 29.9±0.43ab | 35.4±1.53c | 11.8±2.96ab | 19.8±2.62bc | 1.72±0.22ab |
艾丽丝Alice | 24.4±0.30cd | 35.6±3.11c | 9.4±2.85ab | 20.4±1.70bc | 1.61±0.06abcd |
金宝Jumbo | 30.1±0.77ab | 50.4±2.69ab | 15.6±1.54a | 36.2±2.65a | 1.67±0.05abc |
品种 Varieties | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 茎节数 Numbers of stem nodes (No.) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (mm2) |
胡依阿Huia | 2.36±0.10ab | 4.8±0.58ab | 3.63±0.06bc | 2.76±0.08bc | 2083.33±141.67bcd |
海法Haifa | 2.37±0.16ab | 5.0±0.94ab | 4.13±0.17a | 3.13±0.20ab | 2302.00±116.05ab |
罗特Rampart | 2.78±0.08a | 6.8±0.46a | 4.03±0.08b | 3.36±0.28a | 2599.67±105.39a |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 2.35±0.09ab | 5.2±0.37ab | 3.16±0.03de | 2.53±0.03cd | 1692.66±29.78de |
超级海法Super Haifa | 2.62±0.21ab | 5.6±0.81ab | 3.96±0.14b | 2.83±0.03bc | 1934.61±45.93bcd |
游侠Ranger | 2.24±0.14b | 3.6±0.40b | 2.66±0.26fg | 2.06±0.14de | 916.62±58.33f |
欧米克OMK | 2.56±0.09ab | 4.0±0.44b | 2.26±0.06g | 2.00±0.15e | 625.00±38.18f |
麦克MAG | 2.61±0.15ab | 4.6±0.40ab | 3.63±0.17bc | 2.76±0.03bc | 2141.31±176.51bc |
艾丽丝Alice | 2.38±0.15ab | 4.4±0.67ab | 2.90±0.11ef | 2.46±0.12cde | 1524.92±69.48e |
金宝Jumbo | 2.73±0.05a | 5.4±0.40ab | 3.46±0.13cd | 2.93±0.29abc | 1841.73±274.19cde |
品种 Varieties | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%) | 粗纤维 Crude fiber (%) | 粗脂肪 Ether extract (%) | 粗灰分 Crude ash (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 19.3±0.62b | 18.3±0.21c | 1.4±0.1c | 13.5±0.21ab |
海法Haifa | 19.1±0.58b | 17.9±0.87c | 1.5±0.1bc | 10.2±0.17bc |
罗特Rampart | 20.4±0.31a | 21.3±1.20ab | 1.3±0.2c | 11.2±0.35bc |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 21.2±0.79a | 13.8±0.56d | 1.8±0.2ab | 9.8±0.19c |
超级海法Super Haifa | 16.6±1.02c | 28.1±1.01a | 1.5±0.0bc | 9.9±0.24c |
游侠Ranger | 22.8±0.44a | 20.5±0.79b | 1.8±0.1ab | 11.4±1.45bc |
欧米克OMK | 21.6±1.03a | 16.1±0.16c | 2.0±0.4a | 15.7±1.26a |
麦克MAG | 20.4±0.45a | 28.4±0.92a | 1.3±0.1c | 10.8±0.86bc |
艾丽丝Alice | 19.7±0.57b | 24.3±1.14ab | 1.2±0.1c | 12.2±1.18b |
金宝Jumbo | 19.5±0.89b | 16.9±0.32c | 1.9±0.3a | 11.9±0.83bc |
品种 Varieties | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%) | 钙 Ca (g·kg-1) | 全磷 P (g·kg-1) |
胡依阿Huia | 34.4±2.17bc | 31.8±1.68b | 18.70±0.57a | 3.67±0.02ab |
海法Haifa | 31.0±1.56c | 32.2±2.04b | 11.90±0.92bc | 4.53±0.06a |
罗特Rampart | 36.7±1.93bc | 33.3±1.66b | 9.12±0.09c | 3.23±0.02ab |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 27.5±1.75c | 21.0±1.57d | 4.07±0.11d | 4.11±0.19a |
超级海法Super Haifa | 42.0±2.28a | 37.3±1.72a | 10.40±1.69bc | 2.77±0.05b |
游侠Ranger | 27.4±1.77c | 20.4±1.94d | 4.49±0.03d | 4.81±0.04a |
欧米克OMK | 30.6±0.92c | 26.2±1.35c | 3.26±0.04d | 3.90±0.01ab |
麦克MAG | 37.0±1.69b | 35.0±1.82b | 9.75±0.39c | 3.31±0.01ab |
艾丽丝Alice | 37.6±2.68b | 34.8±2.71b | 9.16±0.26c | 2.74±0.07b |
金宝Jumbo | 37.3±1.90b | 32.4±1.03b | 14.60±1.65ab | 3.65±0.28ab |
表5 供试白三叶品种的营养成分
Table 5 The nutrient contents of different white clover varieties
品种 Varieties | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%) | 粗纤维 Crude fiber (%) | 粗脂肪 Ether extract (%) | 粗灰分 Crude ash (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 19.3±0.62b | 18.3±0.21c | 1.4±0.1c | 13.5±0.21ab |
海法Haifa | 19.1±0.58b | 17.9±0.87c | 1.5±0.1bc | 10.2±0.17bc |
罗特Rampart | 20.4±0.31a | 21.3±1.20ab | 1.3±0.2c | 11.2±0.35bc |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 21.2±0.79a | 13.8±0.56d | 1.8±0.2ab | 9.8±0.19c |
超级海法Super Haifa | 16.6±1.02c | 28.1±1.01a | 1.5±0.0bc | 9.9±0.24c |
游侠Ranger | 22.8±0.44a | 20.5±0.79b | 1.8±0.1ab | 11.4±1.45bc |
欧米克OMK | 21.6±1.03a | 16.1±0.16c | 2.0±0.4a | 15.7±1.26a |
麦克MAG | 20.4±0.45a | 28.4±0.92a | 1.3±0.1c | 10.8±0.86bc |
艾丽丝Alice | 19.7±0.57b | 24.3±1.14ab | 1.2±0.1c | 12.2±1.18b |
金宝Jumbo | 19.5±0.89b | 16.9±0.32c | 1.9±0.3a | 11.9±0.83bc |
品种 Varieties | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%) | 钙 Ca (g·kg-1) | 全磷 P (g·kg-1) |
胡依阿Huia | 34.4±2.17bc | 31.8±1.68b | 18.70±0.57a | 3.67±0.02ab |
海法Haifa | 31.0±1.56c | 32.2±2.04b | 11.90±0.92bc | 4.53±0.06a |
罗特Rampart | 36.7±1.93bc | 33.3±1.66b | 9.12±0.09c | 3.23±0.02ab |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 27.5±1.75c | 21.0±1.57d | 4.07±0.11d | 4.11±0.19a |
超级海法Super Haifa | 42.0±2.28a | 37.3±1.72a | 10.40±1.69bc | 2.77±0.05b |
游侠Ranger | 27.4±1.77c | 20.4±1.94d | 4.49±0.03d | 4.81±0.04a |
欧米克OMK | 30.6±0.92c | 26.2±1.35c | 3.26±0.04d | 3.90±0.01ab |
麦克MAG | 37.0±1.69b | 35.0±1.82b | 9.75±0.39c | 3.31±0.01ab |
艾丽丝Alice | 37.6±2.68b | 34.8±2.71b | 9.16±0.26c | 2.74±0.07b |
金宝Jumbo | 37.3±1.90b | 32.4±1.03b | 14.60±1.65ab | 3.65±0.28ab |
品种 Varieties | 等权关联度 Grey correlative | 排序 Rank | 加权关联度 Weighted grey correlative | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 0.6060 | 9 | 0.6163 | 9 |
海法Haifa | 0.6760 | 4 | 0.6924 | 4 |
罗特Rampart | 0.7897 | 1 | 0.8105 | 1 |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 0.7749 | 2 | 0.7755 | 2 |
超级海法Super Haifa | 0.6242 | 8 | 0.6472 | 8 |
游侠Ranger | 0.6567 | 6 | 0.6632 | 7 |
欧米克OMK | 0.6575 | 5 | 0.6658 | 6 |
麦克MAG | 0.6528 | 7 | 0.6777 | 5 |
艾丽丝Alice | 0.5771 | 10 | 0.5936 | 10 |
金宝Jumbo | 0.7524 | 3 | 0.7621 | 3 |
表6 白三叶品种灰色关联度分析
Table 6 Grey relational analysis of different white clover varieties
品种 Varieties | 等权关联度 Grey correlative | 排序 Rank | 加权关联度 Weighted grey correlative | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
胡依阿Huia | 0.6060 | 9 | 0.6163 | 9 |
海法Haifa | 0.6760 | 4 | 0.6924 | 4 |
罗特Rampart | 0.7897 | 1 | 0.8105 | 1 |
超级胡依阿Super Huia | 0.7749 | 2 | 0.7755 | 2 |
超级海法Super Haifa | 0.6242 | 8 | 0.6472 | 8 |
游侠Ranger | 0.6567 | 6 | 0.6632 | 7 |
欧米克OMK | 0.6575 | 5 | 0.6658 | 6 |
麦克MAG | 0.6528 | 7 | 0.6777 | 5 |
艾丽丝Alice | 0.5771 | 10 | 0.5936 | 10 |
金宝Jumbo | 0.7524 | 3 | 0.7621 | 3 |
1 | Ren J Z. China’s traditional agricultural structure does not change——Suffering about nine consecutive years increasing of cereals. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 1-5. |
任继周. 我国传统农业结构不改变不行了——粮食九连增后的隐忧. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 1-5. | |
2 | Ma G L. On grain to feed and herbivorous animal husbandry development. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 2: 199. |
马桂林. 关于粮改饲与草食畜牧业发展. 畜牧兽医科技信息, 2021, 2: 199. | |
3 | Li Z B, Li D. Development measures of popularizing forage and forage animal husbandry in grain reform. Veterinary Orientation, 2021, 1: 91. |
李章鹏, 李丁. 推广粮改饲草食畜牧业的发展措施. 兽医导刊, 2021, 1: 91. | |
4 | Bai X. Sichuan will create four livestock industry belt. Agricultural Knowledge: Scientific Breeding, 2006, 6: 17. |
白翔. 四川打造四大畜牧业产业带. 农业知识: 科学养殖, 2006, 6: 17. | |
5 | Wang L Q. Planting technology and economic value of white clover. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2011, 8: 122-123. |
王丽琴. 白三叶的种植技术及经济价值. 畜牧兽医科技信息, 2011, 8: 122-123. | |
6 | Hu T H. Management model of grass/white clover grassland in northwest Guizhou. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021. |
胡廷花. 黔西北区禾草/白三叶草地质量评价及稳定性管理模式研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021. | |
7 | Qian Y L, Wang X Z, Lai X F, et al. Effects of perennial forage on characteristics of the soil community in an apple orchard. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11): 124-132. |
钱雅丽, 王先之, 来兴发, 等. 多年生牧草种植对苹果园土壤真菌群落特征的影响. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 124-132. | |
8 | Wu Y F. Set of forage species registered in China. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1999: 92-93. |
吴永敷. 中国牧草登记品种集. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999: 92-93. | |
9 | Yang Z H, Sha Y S. Set of forage species registered in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007: 154-155. |
杨振海, 沙玉圣. 中国审定登记草品种集. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 154-155. | |
10 | Yun X J. Set of forage species registered in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2017: 161-164. |
贠旭江. 中国审定草品种集. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017: 161-164. | |
11 | Yu Y W, Xu Z, Miao J X, et al. The growing characteristics of perennial ryegrass and white clover and their coexisted behave performance in mixed pasture. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2002, 11(3): 34-39. |
于应文, 徐震, 苗建勋, 等. 混播草地中多年生黑麦草与白三叶的生长特性及其共存表现. 草业学报, 2002, 11(3): 34-39. | |
12 | Orr R J, Parsons A J, Penning P D, et al. Sward composition, animal performance and the potential production of grass/white clover swards continuously stocked with sheep. Grass and Forage Science, 2010, 45: 325-336. |
13 | Gong J J, Wang F T, Ma Y L, et al. Research progress of sod culture grass in southern orchards and tea gardens. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 52-58. |
龚家建, 王锋堂, 马亚龙, 等. 南方果茶园生草栽培草种研究进展. 农学学报, 2021, 11(6): 52-58. | |
14 | Li Z, Peng Y, Su X Y. Physiological responses of white clover by different leaf types associated with anti-oxidative enzyme protection and osmotic adjustment under drought stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2): 257-263. |
李州, 彭燕, 苏星源. 不同叶型白三叶抗氧化保护及渗透调节生理对干旱胁迫的响应. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 257-263. | |
15 | Chen J H, Lu X Y, Li Y F, et al. Effects of grass-growing on soil physical and chemical characteristics of ‘Korla Fragrant Pear’ orchard. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 7: 71-79. |
陈久红, 鲁晓燕, 李永丰, 等. 生草对库尔勒香梨梨园土壤理化性质的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019, 7: 71-79. | |
16 | Zhang Y J, Xue S M, Ye R Q. A comparative study of five white clover (Trifolium repens L.) cultivars. Journal of Forage and Feed, 2010, 4(1): 32-34. |
张宇钧, 薛世明, 叶瑞卿. 5个白三叶品种品比试验初报. 牧草与饲料, 2010, 4(1): 32-34. | |
17 | Cao W J, Zhang Y J. Comparative study on protein content in different white clover varieties. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 3(2): 61-65. |
曹文娟, 张英俊. 不同品种白三叶蛋白质含量比较. 草业科学, 2009, 3(2): 61-65. | |
18 | Fan Y. Study on germplasm resource evaluation and selection of the superior clones for local late-maturing walnut of Mabian County in Sichuan. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015. |
樊勇. 四川(马边)乡土核桃优良无性系初步选育. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2015. | |
19 | 农业农村部. 草品种区域试验技术规程豆科牧草, NY/T 2834-2015. 北京: 中华人民共和国农业农村部, 2015. |
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Technical specification for regional test of legume forage, NY/T 2834-2015. Beijing: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China, 2015. | |
20 | Inostroza L, Bhakta M, Acuña H, et al. Understanding the complexity of cold tolerance in white clover using temperature gradient locations and a GWAS approach. The Plant Genome, 2018, 11(3): 1-14. |
21 | Wang J L, Shen Z B, Pan D F, et al. Study of the major quantitative character difference and theirs correlations among germplasm resources of Trifolium repens L. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(26): 19-23. |
王建丽, 申忠宝, 潘多峰, 等. 白三叶种质资源主要数量性状的变异与相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(26): 19-23. | |
22 | Li N. The comparison on various methods for determing different proteins. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 26(2): 132-134. |
李宁. 几种蛋白质测定方法的比较. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 26(2): 132-134. | |
23 | Yang Y G, Long M X, Wang Y, et al. Evaluation on the nutrition value of forage, silage corn and straw using Van-soest method. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2004, 12(2): 132-135. |
杨云贵, 龙明秀, 王莺, 等. 牧草、玉米青贮和作物秸秆营养价值的洗涤剂法评定. 草地学报, 2004, 12(2): 132-135. | |
24 | Li C Y, Zheng L, Yang W J, et al. Research on factors affecting determination of acid detergent lignin in many types of plants by using Van soest method. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2019, 31(3): 61-64. |
李朝英, 郑路, 杨文娟, 等. 用范氏法测定多类植物中酸性洗涤木质素的影响因素研究. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 61-64. | |
25 | Zhong H J. Improvement of soxhlet extraction method for determination of crude fat content. China Feed, 2003, 12(3): 35-36. |
钟红舰. 索氏抽提法测定粗脂肪含量的改进. 中国饲料, 2003, 12(3): 35-36. | |
26 | Zeng G B, Cao Q Y. Optimization of determination method of crude ash content in feed. Feed Research, 2017, 4: 48-53. |
曾根滨, 曹庆云. 饲料中粗灰分含量测定方法的优化探索. 饲料研究, 2017, 4: 48-53. | |
27 | Tian B, Ran X Q, Xue H, et al. Evaluation of the nutritive value of 42 kinds of forage in Guizhou Province by grey relational grade analysis. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 92-103. |
田兵, 冉雪琴, 薛红, 等. 贵州42种野生牧草营养价值灰色关联度分析. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 92-103. | |
28 | Wang K J, Zhang J W, Liu P, et al. Crude protein content and yield of fifty maize (Zea mays L.) varieties widely planted in the north of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(5): 916-921. |
王空军, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 等. 玉米不同品种粗蛋白质含量与产量的研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(5): 916-921. | |
29 | Li X H. A model based on the grey relation grade for multi-objective decision-making and its application. Journal of Shandong University (Nature Science), 2007, 42(12): 33-36. |
李秀红. 基于灰色关联度的多目标决策模型与应用. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2007, 42(12): 33-36. | |
30 | Yuan Y L, Tang D, Lu Y, et al. An investigation multiple crop planting options when following wheat with mixed-cropped forage rape and oats in the Jilin area of Northeast China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 167-178. |
袁英良, 唐丹, 鲁英, 等. 吉林地区麦后复种饲用油菜与燕麦混播效应研究. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 167-178. | |
31 | He J, Mao Z L, Zeng H. Study on grass yield of white clover in different years of cultivation. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2007, 12: 13-14. |
何静, 毛中丽, 曾华. 不同栽培年限白三叶产草量的研究. 草业与畜牧, 2007, 12: 13-14. | |
32 | Zuo Y C, Yang C H, Du Z H, et al. The synthesizing evaluation in mixture pasture of whip grass and white clover. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 21(4): 1094-1099. |
左艳春, 杨春华, 杜周和, 等. 扁穗牛鞭草和白三叶混播组合的综合评价. 西南农业学报, 2008, 21(4): 1094-1099. | |
33 | Wu H T. Assessment of Trifolium repens L. wild germplasm resources introduced from Russia. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2009. |
吴海涛. 俄罗斯引进野生白三叶种质资源的价值评价. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2009. | |
34 | Long H Y, He H X, Zhang D, et al. Comparison of Stylosanthes guianensis in degraded mountain Yuanmou of the dry-hot valley. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6): 230-236. |
龙会英, 何华玄, 张德, 等. 干热河谷退化山地柱花草品种(系)比较试验. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 230-236. | |
35 | Jiang L F, Zhang X Q, Fu Y F, et al. Agronomic trait variation of some main orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) cultivars in China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(3): 142-154. |
蒋林峰, 张新全, 付玉凤, 等. 中国主要鸭茅品种农艺性状变异研究. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 142-154. | |
36 | Xia X J. Introduction of herbage varieties to the Chengdu region. Pratacultural Science, 2003, 20(12): 12-14. |
夏先玖. 白三叶和黑麦草品种在成都地区的引种试验. 草业科学, 2003, 20(12): 12-14. | |
37 | Chang X, Li F J, Zhang Z P, et al. Mapping QTLs for flag leaf length, width and area in wheat. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(5): 896-901. |
常鑫, 李法计, 张兆萍, 等. 小麦旗叶长、宽及面积的QTL分析. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(5): 896-901. | |
38 | Antoniewicz A M, Kowalczyk J, Kanski J, et al. Rumen degradability of crude protein of dried grass and lucerne forage measured by in sacco incubation and predicted by near infrared spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1995, 54(1): 203-216. |
39 | Zhao J D, Song Y T, Xu X L, et al. Effects of nitrogen application and mowing on yield and quality of forage in degraded grassland in northwest Liaoning Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 36-48. |
赵京东, 宋彦涛, 徐鑫磊, 等. 施氮和刈割对辽西北退化草地牧草产量和品质的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(8): 36-48. | |
40 | Wang H M, Wang Z L. Evaluation of nutritional values of foreign large-leave white clovers by gas production in vitro and digestion techniques in vitro. Feed Industry, 2016, 37(20): 30-33. |
王红梅, 王仲良. 应用体外产气和体外消化法评定国外大叶型白三叶营养价值. 饲料工业, 2016, 37(20): 30-33. | |
41 | Toshihiko Y, Ji Y J. Effects of grazing density on white clover varieties in perennial ryegrass-white clover grassland. Qinghai Prataculture, 2001, 10(4): 44-45. |
Toshihiko Y, 纪亚君. 放牧密度对多年生黑麦草-白三叶草地上白三叶品种的影响. 青海草业, 2001, 10(4): 44-45. | |
42 | Liu C Y, Sun X Y, Zhu T C, et al. Comparison of the production performance of ryegrass cultivars and screening of dominant varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 39-48. |
刘春英, 孙学映, 朱体超, 等. 不同黑麦草品种生产性能比较与优势品种筛选. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 39-48. | |
43 | Zhang S L, Zhang G L. Comparison of grey correlation degree calculation methods and analysis of existing problems. Systems Engineering, 1996, 14(3): 45-49. |
张绍良, 张国良. 灰色关联度计算方法比较及其存在问题分析. 系统工程, 1996, 14(3): 45-49. | |
44 | Xu L J, Liu Q, Xiao S L, et al. Productive performance of oat rotation in spring fallow in Wumeng Mountain area. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(3): 514-521. |
徐丽君, 柳茜, 肖石良, 等. 乌蒙山区春闲田粮草轮作燕麦的生产性能. 草业科学, 2020, 37(3): 514-521. | |
45 | Xiao Y, Yang Z F, Nie G, et al. Multi-trait evaluation of yield and nutritive value of 12 Lolium multiflorum varieties or lines in Chengdu Plain. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 174-185. |
肖逸, 杨忠富, 聂刚, 等. 12个多花黑麦草品种(系)在成都平原的生产性能和营养价值综合评价. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 174-185. | |
46 | Sha B P, Xie Y Z, Gao X Q, et al. Effects of coupling of drip irrigation water and fertilizer on yield and quality of alfalfa in the yellow river irrigation district. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 102-114. |
沙栢平, 谢应忠, 高雪芹, 等. 地下滴灌水肥耦合对紫花苜蓿草产量及品质的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 102-114. | |
47 | Jiang H X, Bai S S, Wu B, et al. A multivariate evaluation of agronomic straits and forage quality of 22 oat varieties in the Huang-Huai-Hai area of China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 140-149. |
姜慧新, 柏杉杉, 吴波, 等. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1): 140-149. |
[1] | 付东青, 贾春英, 张力, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 南疆干旱灌溉区青贮玉米农艺性状和发酵品质动态分析及评价[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(8): 111-125. |
[2] | 戈建珍, 傅文慧, 张露, 蔺宝珺, 赵帅, 白玛噶翁, 寇建村. 多菌灵在果园白三叶青贮中的降解及其对微生物群落的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(7): 64-75. |
[3] | 撖冬荣, 姚拓, 李海云, 陈敏豪, 高亚敏, 李昌宁, 白洁, 苏明. 化肥减量配施微生物肥料对垂穗披碱草生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 53-61. |
[4] | 撖冬荣, 姚拓, 李海云, 黄书超, 杨琰珊, 高亚敏, 李昌宁, 张银翠. 微生物肥料与化肥减量配施对多年生黑麦草生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3): 136-143. |
[5] | 沈吉成, 王蕾, 赵彩霞, 叶发慧, 吕士凯, 刘德梅, 刘瑞娟, 张怀刚, 陈文杰. 77份裸燕麦品种籽粒相关性状分析[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3): 156-167. |
[6] | 赵成振, 李强, 钟荣珍. 不同物候期刈割对羊草再生和根形态及产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3): 92-100. |
[7] | 刘丽英, 贾玉山, 范文强, 尹强, 成启明, 王志军. 影响苜蓿自然干燥的主要环境因子研究[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 121-132. |
[8] | 张岳阳, 李芳, 梁维维, 李彦忠. 新疆昌吉32个紫花苜蓿品种的田间抗病性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 133-146. |
[9] | 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮, 柴继宽. 海拔和品种对燕麦营养品质及表面附着微生物的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 147-157. |
[10] | 吴欣明, 方志红, 池惠武, 贾会丽, 刘建宁, 石永红, 王学敏. 30个青贮玉米在雁门关地区品种评比试验[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(1): 205-216. |
[11] | 徐强, 田新会, 杜文华. 高寒牧区黑麦和箭筈豌豆混播对草产量和营养品质的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(8): 49-59. |
[12] | 王云霞, 张萍, 葛蓓蕾, 雅蓉, 杨英, 靳磊. 渥丹百合农艺性状及活性成分对钾元素的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 205-213. |
[13] | 肖逸, 杨忠富, 聂刚, 韩佳婷, 帅杨, 张新全. 12个多花黑麦草品种(系)在成都平原的生产性能和营养价值综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 174-185. |
[14] | 吴瑞, 刘文辉, 张永超, 秦燕, 魏小星, 刘敏洁. 青藏高原老芒麦落粒性及农艺性状相关性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 130-139. |
[15] | 王辛有, 曹文侠, 王小军, 刘玉祯, 高瑞, 王世林, 安海涛, 邓秀霞, 王文虎. 河西地区豆禾混播草地生产性能对刈割高度与施肥的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||