草业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 214-226.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023430
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
洪莉平1,4(), 李小冬2(), 于二汝3(), 裴成江2, 尚以顺2, 骆金红2, 孙光2, 周云昊1, 李世歌2, 杨航2, 刘凤丹2
收稿日期:
2023-11-15
修回日期:
2024-02-21
出版日期:
2024-09-20
发布日期:
2024-06-20
通讯作者:
李小冬,于二汝
作者简介:
E-mail: yuerru@163.com基金资助:
Li-ping HONG1,4(), Xiao-dong LI2(), Er-ru YU3(), Cheng-jiang PEI2, Yi-shun SHANG2, Jin-hong LUO2, Guang SUN2, Yun-hao ZHOU1, Shi-ge LI2, Hang YANG2, Feng-dan LIU2
Received:
2023-11-15
Revised:
2024-02-21
Online:
2024-09-20
Published:
2024-06-20
Contact:
Xiao-dong LI,Er-ru YU
摘要:
试验旨在分析不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊淘汰母羊瘤胃发酵参数、血清抗氧化酶活性、瘤胃微生物区系的影响,为开发紫苏及其副产物作为饲料资源在黑山羊淘汰母羊育肥中的应用提供技术支撑。选取32只年龄、体况相近的贵州黑山羊,随机分为1个对照组和3个处理组,饲喂不同全混合日粮颗粒饲料,分别为对照组(CK组)、紫苏秸秆组(S1组)、紫苏饼粕组(S2组)及紫苏种子组(S3组),预试期14 d,试验期60 d,每30 d测定一次体重,试验结束后采集血液、瘤胃液,用于测定血清抗氧化酶活性、瘤胃发酵参数以及瘤胃微生物区系。结果显示:添加不同紫苏组分处理都能显著增加淘汰母羊育肥前期(0~30 d)日增重(P<0.05),其中S3组增重最大,其次为S2和S1组;而育肥后期各组日增重差异不显著(P>0.05)。其次,S1和S3组均能显著提高血清样品超氧化物歧化酶活性(SOD)和丙二醛(MDA)含量(P<0.05),而过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性和总抗氧化能力(T-AOC)含量在各组间表现各不相同(P>0.05)。添加紫苏组分的试验组均能显著降低乙酸含量(P<0.05),丙酸、丁酸、异丁酸、戊酸、异戊酸和总挥发性脂肪酸含量在S2、S3和CK组中差异不显著(P>0.05),而在S1组中相应有机酸含量均显著低于CK组(P<0.05)。氨态氮的含量在各组别间差异不显著(P>0.05)。通过高通量测序分析瘤胃微生物区系发现,不同处理对瘤胃微生物种类没有显著影响,而反应相同微生物物种丰度的Chao1指数和ACE指数在S1与S3间表现不相同,其中Chao1指数差异显著(P=0.047),而ACE指数差异不显著(P=0.062)。OTU检出S1组>S2组>CK组>S3组,从门水平分析各试验组优势菌群丰度,各试验组优势菌群主要为厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门和变形菌门微生物,其中S2和S3组中厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门丰度总和略高于CK组,S1、S2和S3组中变形菌门的丰度均低于CK组;属水平分析各试验组优势菌群主要为普雷沃氏菌属、奎因氏菌属、琥珀酸弧菌属以及不可培养的瘤胃微生物菌属,其中S1、S2和S3组中不可培养瘤胃微生物丰度高于CK组。其余微生物丰度在各试验组中各不相同。上述结果表明,添加不同紫苏组分能够不同程度改善淘汰母羊前期育肥效果,以添加紫苏籽效果最佳,其原因可能是通过增加血清抗氧化能力、调节淘汰母羊对粗纤维和非纤维性碳水化合物的消化能力及调控瘤胃微生物区系的组成,进而改善淘汰母羊的育肥效果。
洪莉平, 李小冬, 于二汝, 裴成江, 尚以顺, 骆金红, 孙光, 周云昊, 李世歌, 杨航, 刘凤丹. 不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊血清抗氧化酶活性、瘤胃发酵参数、瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 214-226.
Li-ping HONG, Xiao-dong LI, Er-ru YU, Cheng-jiang PEI, Yi-shun SHANG, Jin-hong LUO, Guang SUN, Yun-hao ZHOU, Shi-ge LI, Hang YANG, Feng-dan LIU. Effects of different perilla (Perilla frutescens) materials on serum antioxidant enzyme activity, rumen fermentation parameters and microflora of Guizhou black goats[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 214-226.
营养成分Nutrients component | 紫苏秸秆Perilla straw | 紫苏饼粕Perilla meal | 紫苏籽Perilla seed |
---|---|---|---|
粗蛋白Crude protein | 11.53±0.32 | 33.73±0.35 | 22.97±0.55 |
粗脂肪Ether extract | 6.10±0.30 | 16.13±0.76 | 37.90±2.69 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber | 70.93±1.00 | 44.70±0.78 | 26.50±1.28 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber | 51.90±1.80 | 23.83±1.00 | 14.40±1.45 |
粗灰分Ash | 12.43±1.08 | 6.27±0.06 | 3.58±0.04 |
表1 紫苏原料主要营养成分含量(干物质基础)
Table 1 Main nutrients content of perilla materials (dry matter basis, %)
营养成分Nutrients component | 紫苏秸秆Perilla straw | 紫苏饼粕Perilla meal | 紫苏籽Perilla seed |
---|---|---|---|
粗蛋白Crude protein | 11.53±0.32 | 33.73±0.35 | 22.97±0.55 |
粗脂肪Ether extract | 6.10±0.30 | 16.13±0.76 | 37.90±2.69 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber | 70.93±1.00 | 44.70±0.78 | 26.50±1.28 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber | 51.90±1.80 | 23.83±1.00 | 14.40±1.45 |
粗灰分Ash | 12.43±1.08 | 6.27±0.06 | 3.58±0.04 |
项目 Item | 对照组 Control group (CK) | 秸秆组 Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组 Meal group (S2) | 种子组 Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
原料Ingredient | ||||
玉米Corn (%) | 24.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 22.5 |
豆粕Soybean meal (%) | 4.0 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
麦麸Wheat bran (%) | 18.0 | 17.5 | 16.0 | 16.0 |
玉米酒糟粕Distillers dried grains with soluble (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
玉米胚芽粕Corn germ meal (%) | 16.0 | 16.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
谷壳Rice chaff (%) | 10.0 | 8.3 | 12.0 | 13.3 |
沸石粉Zeolite mea (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
紫花苜蓿草粉Alfalfa powder (%) | 15.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
紫苏秸秆Perilla straw (%) | 0 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 |
紫苏饼粕Perilla meal (%) | 0 | 0 | 10.0 | 0 |
紫苏种子Perilla seed (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.0 |
预混料Premix1) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
合计Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
营养水平Nutrient level | ||||
干物质Dry matter (%) | 88.34 | 88.27 | 88.19 | 88.23 |
有机物Organic matter (%) | 90.58 | 90.64 | 91.02 | 90.89 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein (%) | 14.95 | 14.81 | 15.07 | 14.99 |
粗脂肪Ether extract (%) | 1.92 | 1.88 | 1.96 | 2.01 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 35.58 | 36.74 | 33.25 | 34.76 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (%) | 25.46 | 26.11 | 24.73 | 24.81 |
总能General energy (MJ·kg-1) | 20.08 | 20.08 | 20.28 | 20.24 |
代谢能Metabolic energy (MJ·kg-1) 2) | 9.39 | 9.38 | 9.40 | 9.40 |
表2 日粮组成及营养水平(干物质基础)
Table 2 Composition and nutrient levels of diets (dry matter basis)
项目 Item | 对照组 Control group (CK) | 秸秆组 Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组 Meal group (S2) | 种子组 Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
原料Ingredient | ||||
玉米Corn (%) | 24.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 22.5 |
豆粕Soybean meal (%) | 4.0 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
麦麸Wheat bran (%) | 18.0 | 17.5 | 16.0 | 16.0 |
玉米酒糟粕Distillers dried grains with soluble (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
玉米胚芽粕Corn germ meal (%) | 16.0 | 16.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
谷壳Rice chaff (%) | 10.0 | 8.3 | 12.0 | 13.3 |
沸石粉Zeolite mea (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
紫花苜蓿草粉Alfalfa powder (%) | 15.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
紫苏秸秆Perilla straw (%) | 0 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 |
紫苏饼粕Perilla meal (%) | 0 | 0 | 10.0 | 0 |
紫苏种子Perilla seed (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.0 |
预混料Premix1) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
合计Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
营养水平Nutrient level | ||||
干物质Dry matter (%) | 88.34 | 88.27 | 88.19 | 88.23 |
有机物Organic matter (%) | 90.58 | 90.64 | 91.02 | 90.89 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein (%) | 14.95 | 14.81 | 15.07 | 14.99 |
粗脂肪Ether extract (%) | 1.92 | 1.88 | 1.96 | 2.01 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 35.58 | 36.74 | 33.25 | 34.76 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (%) | 25.46 | 26.11 | 24.73 | 24.81 |
总能General energy (MJ·kg-1) | 20.08 | 20.08 | 20.28 | 20.24 |
代谢能Metabolic energy (MJ·kg-1) 2) | 9.39 | 9.38 | 9.40 | 9.40 |
项目Item | 对照组Control group (CK) | 秸秆组Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组Meal group (S2) | 种子组Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
初始体重Initial weight (kg) | 30.73±0.91 | 30.51±0.67 | 31.60±0.74 | 30.28±0.73 |
结束体重Final weight (kg) | 35.38±1.08 | 36.29±1.62 | 37.73±1.77 | 37.47±1.87 |
平均日增重Average daily gain (g·d-1) | ||||
1~30 d | 49.72±5.98b | 91.39±15.44a | 96.39±29.66a | 110.83±49.03a |
30~60 d | 105.55±28.16 | 95.83±38.70 | 107.78±47.07 | 128.61±61.22 |
全期Whole period | 77.64±15.11 | 93.61±25.43 | 102.08±36.11 | 119.72±49.03 |
表3 不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊淘汰母羊育肥效果的影响
Table 3 Effects of different perilla materials on fattening of Guizhou black goat cull ewes
项目Item | 对照组Control group (CK) | 秸秆组Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组Meal group (S2) | 种子组Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
初始体重Initial weight (kg) | 30.73±0.91 | 30.51±0.67 | 31.60±0.74 | 30.28±0.73 |
结束体重Final weight (kg) | 35.38±1.08 | 36.29±1.62 | 37.73±1.77 | 37.47±1.87 |
平均日增重Average daily gain (g·d-1) | ||||
1~30 d | 49.72±5.98b | 91.39±15.44a | 96.39±29.66a | 110.83±49.03a |
30~60 d | 105.55±28.16 | 95.83±38.70 | 107.78±47.07 | 128.61±61.22 |
全期Whole period | 77.64±15.11 | 93.61±25.43 | 102.08±36.11 | 119.72±49.03 |
项目 Item | 对照组Control group (CK) | 秸秆组Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组Meal group (S2) | 种子组Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
超氧化物歧化酶Superoxide dismutase (SOD, U·mL-1) | 5.93±0.85b | 8.53±0.80a | 6.41±0.56b | 9.11±1.00a |
谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX,U·mL-1) | 183.30±14.67b | 234.90±26.94a | 221.10±15.51ab | 219.30±28.86ab |
过氧化氢酶Catalase (CAT,U·mL-1) | 0.28±0.19 | 0.31±0.18 | 0.23±0.17 | 0.26±0.15 |
总抗氧化能力Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC,mmol·L-1) | 0.93±0.08 | 1.15±0.12 | 1.07±0.22 | 0.92±0.12 |
丙二醛Malondialdehyde (MDA, nmol·mL-1) | 0.81±0.11b | 1.94±0.15a | 1.53±0.18a | 1.77±0.24a |
表4 不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊淘汰母羊血清抗氧化能力的影响
Table 4 Effects of different perilla materials on serum antioxidant capacity of Guizhou black goat cull ewes
项目 Item | 对照组Control group (CK) | 秸秆组Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组Meal group (S2) | 种子组Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
超氧化物歧化酶Superoxide dismutase (SOD, U·mL-1) | 5.93±0.85b | 8.53±0.80a | 6.41±0.56b | 9.11±1.00a |
谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX,U·mL-1) | 183.30±14.67b | 234.90±26.94a | 221.10±15.51ab | 219.30±28.86ab |
过氧化氢酶Catalase (CAT,U·mL-1) | 0.28±0.19 | 0.31±0.18 | 0.23±0.17 | 0.26±0.15 |
总抗氧化能力Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC,mmol·L-1) | 0.93±0.08 | 1.15±0.12 | 1.07±0.22 | 0.92±0.12 |
丙二醛Malondialdehyde (MDA, nmol·mL-1) | 0.81±0.11b | 1.94±0.15a | 1.53±0.18a | 1.77±0.24a |
项目 Item | 对照组 Control group (CK) | 秸秆组 Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组 Meal group (S2) | 种子组 Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
pH值pH value | 7.12±0.03 | 7.13±0.02 | 7.10±0.01 | 7.11±0.02 |
乙酸Acetate acid (A, mmol·L-1) | 46.67±0.41a | 34.97±0.14b | 42.13±0.64b | 40.94±0.40b |
丙酸Propionate acid (P, mmol·L-1) | 41.77±0.38a | 31.64±0.34b | 39.64±0.58a | 40.14±0.79a |
丁酸Butyrate acid (mmol·L-1) | 3.47±0.07a | 2.22±0.03b | 3.47±0.05a | 3.97±0.26a |
异丁酸Isobutyrate acid (mmol·L-1) | 0.44±0.06a | 0.22±0.02b | 0.47±0.03a | 0.49±0.03a |
戊酸Valerate acid (mmol·L-1) | 3.32±0.09a | 2.18±0.10b | 3.33±0.14a | 3.08±0.08a |
异戊酸Isovaleric acid (mmol·L-1) | 5.18±0.13a | 2.99±0.25b | 5.35±0.11a | 5.21±0.19a |
总挥发性脂肪酸TVFA (mmol·L-1) | 100.84±0.60a | 74.22±0.31b | 94.14±0.94ab | 93.80±1.24ab |
乙酸/丙酸A/P | 1.12±0.04 | 1.11±0.06 | 1.07±0.03 | 1.02±0.03 |
氨态氮Ammonium nitrogen (AN, mg·dL-1) | 10.32±0.16 | 10.02±0.28 | 10.19±0.29 | 10.12±0.27 |
表5 不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊淘汰母羊瘤胃发酵参数的影响
Table 5 Effects of different perilla materials on rumen fermentation of Guizhou black goat cull ewes
项目 Item | 对照组 Control group (CK) | 秸秆组 Straw group (S1) | 饼粕组 Meal group (S2) | 种子组 Seed group (S3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
pH值pH value | 7.12±0.03 | 7.13±0.02 | 7.10±0.01 | 7.11±0.02 |
乙酸Acetate acid (A, mmol·L-1) | 46.67±0.41a | 34.97±0.14b | 42.13±0.64b | 40.94±0.40b |
丙酸Propionate acid (P, mmol·L-1) | 41.77±0.38a | 31.64±0.34b | 39.64±0.58a | 40.14±0.79a |
丁酸Butyrate acid (mmol·L-1) | 3.47±0.07a | 2.22±0.03b | 3.47±0.05a | 3.97±0.26a |
异丁酸Isobutyrate acid (mmol·L-1) | 0.44±0.06a | 0.22±0.02b | 0.47±0.03a | 0.49±0.03a |
戊酸Valerate acid (mmol·L-1) | 3.32±0.09a | 2.18±0.10b | 3.33±0.14a | 3.08±0.08a |
异戊酸Isovaleric acid (mmol·L-1) | 5.18±0.13a | 2.99±0.25b | 5.35±0.11a | 5.21±0.19a |
总挥发性脂肪酸TVFA (mmol·L-1) | 100.84±0.60a | 74.22±0.31b | 94.14±0.94ab | 93.80±1.24ab |
乙酸/丙酸A/P | 1.12±0.04 | 1.11±0.06 | 1.07±0.03 | 1.02±0.03 |
氨态氮Ammonium nitrogen (AN, mg·dL-1) | 10.32±0.16 | 10.02±0.28 | 10.19±0.29 | 10.12±0.27 |
图1 不同处理组生物学重复重现性和检出OTU的比较分析A: 瘤胃微生物PCA分析PCA analysis of rumen microbial; B: 不同生物学重复聚类分析(处理组后的编号为试验羊的耳标号)Cluster analysis of different biology repeats (the number dash to the treatment is the ear label number of the experimental goat); C: 测序获得的单一有效序列数和检出的OTU The number of single effective sequences obtained by sequencing and the detected OTUs; D: 各试验组间OTU韦恩图分析Venn plots among experimental groups.
Fig.1 Comparative analysis of biological repeatability and OTUs detected in different treatment groups
图2 瘤胃微生物香农指数、辛普森指数、Chao1指数和ACE指数比较分析横线上的数字表示两组别间的P值。The number above the dash stands for the P value between two groups.
Fig.2 Comparative analysis of rumen microflora shannon index, simpson index, Chao1 index and ACE index among different groups
图3 瘤胃微生物的优势菌群及其相对丰度在门和属水平的分析比较
Fig.3 Comparative analysis of dominant rumen microflora and its abundance among different groups at phylum and genus levels
1 | Yu E R, Li H L, Yang H, et al. Evaluation of main quality traits of local perilla resources in Guizhou. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2020, 42(1): 78-84. |
于二汝, 李慧琳, 杨航, 等. 贵州紫苏资源主要品质性状的分析与评价. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(1): 78-84. | |
2 | Guo P H, Gao D D, Liu H X, et al. Research progress on forage utilization of Perilla and its straw for medicinal and edible purposes. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 47(3): 54-57. |
郭鹏辉, 高丹丹, 刘慧霞, 等. 药食两用植物紫苏及其秸秆的饲料化利用研究进展. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2017, 47(3): 54-57. | |
3 | Ueda H, Yamazaki C, Yamazaki M, et al. Luteolin as an anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic constituent of Perilla frutescens. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2002, 25(9): 1197-1202. |
4 | Mu S Q. Types and nutritional value of common non-food feed resources. Swine Industry Science, 2019, 36(7): 40-43. |
穆淑琴. 常见非粮型饲料资源的种类及营养价值. 猪业科学, 2019, 36(7): 40-43. | |
5 | Pan C X. Effect of perilla seed extract on growth performance of fattening pigs. South China Agriculture, 2012, 6(10): 80-82. |
潘存霞. 紫苏籽提取物对育肥猪生长性能的影响. 南方农业, 2012, 6(10): 80-82. | |
6 | Qiao L M. The effect of perilla seed extract on the production performance and Newcastle disease antibody levels of laying hens during the late peak egg production period. Journal of Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, 2017, 31(5): 17-20. |
乔利敏. 紫苏籽提取物对蛋种鸡产蛋高峰后期生产性能及新城疫抗体水平的影响. 北京农业职业学院学报, 2017, 31(5): 17-20. | |
7 | Qiao L M, Guan W Y, Yang J X, et al. Effects of Perilla frutescens seed extracts on performance, reproductive hormone and reproductive performance of egg genus chicken during the late laying peak period. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 53(4): 88-92. |
乔利敏, 关文怡, 杨久仙, 等. 紫苏籽提取物对蛋种鸡产蛋高峰后期生产性能、激素水平及繁殖性能的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2017, 53(4): 88-92. | |
8 | Zhang H B. Effects of perilla seed extract on intramuscular fat deposition in fattening cattle. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(4): 1897-1903. |
张海波. 紫苏籽提取物对育肥牛肌内脂肪沉积的影响. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(4): 1897-1903. | |
9 | Wang Y J. Effects of silage Perilla on rumen fermentation and blood biochemical indexes of brown cattle in Xin jiang. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2020. |
王永健. 添加青贮紫苏对新疆褐牛生长、瘤胃发酵及血液、生化指标的影响. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2020. | |
10 | Gu X W. Effect of Perilla frutescens, tangerine peel and argy wormwood leaf on milk flavor, rumen environment and blood biochemical indexes of dairy cows. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2010. |
顾小卫. 紫苏、陈皮和艾叶对奶牛乳风味、乳品质、瘤胃内环境及血液生化指标的影响. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2010. | |
11 | Deng K P, Wang F, Ma T W, et al. Effect of dietary Perilla frutescens seed intake on rumen fermentation characteristics, apparent nutrient digestibility, and growth performance of Hu sheep.Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(5): 205-212. |
邓凯平, 王锋, 马铁伟, 等. 日粮中添加不同水平紫苏籽对湖羊生长性能、瘤胃发酵及养分表观消化率的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 205-212. | |
12 | Yu E R, Li X D, Yang H, et al. Comparative experiment on adaptability and nutritional quality of seven Perilla frutescens strains in Guizhou province. Feed Research, 2022, 45(23): 123-128. |
于二汝, 李小冬, 杨航, 等. 7种饲用紫苏品系在贵州地区适应性比较与营养价值分析. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(23): 123-128. | |
13 | DB15/T 1653-2019. Feeding standard of dumeng mutton sheep. |
DB15/T 1653-2019. 杜蒙肉羊饲养标准. | |
14 | GB/T 6432-2018. Determination of crude protein in feeds-Kjeldahl method. |
GB/T 6432-2018. 饲料中粗蛋白的测定 凯氏定氮法. | |
15 | GB/T 20806-2022.Determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in feeds. |
GB/T 20806-2022. 饲料中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定. | |
16 | NY/T 1459-2007. Determination of acid detergent fiber in feedstuff (ADF). |
NY/T 1459-2007. 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)的测定. | |
17 | Ma Y, Tan W H, Shen J Z, et al. Determination of the heat values of several cereals with Bobm-Calorimeter. Life Science Instruments, 2013, 11(6): 42-43. |
马艳, 谭卫红, 沈娟章, 等. 新型氧弹量热仪测定谷物的热值. 生命科学仪器, 2013, 11(6): 42-43. | |
18 | Wan F, Zhao J B, Ma T, et al. Establishment of prediction model of metabolizable energy of common protein feedstuffs for mutton sheep using nutrient and digestible nutrient contents of feedstuffs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017, 29(5): 1774-1784. |
万凡, 赵江波, 马涛, 等. 利用饲料原料中的营养成分和可消化营养成分含量建立肉羊常用蛋白质饲料原料代谢能的预测模型. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29(5): 1774-1784. | |
19 | Xu C D, Yi Y Y, Quan W H, et al. Approach of phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Journal of Wuxi University of Light Industry, 1998, 17(1): 34-38. |
徐晨东, 易蕴玉, 全文海, 等. 利用苯酚-次氯酸盐反应测定铵离子方法的探讨. 无锡轻工大学学报, 1998, 17(1): 34-38. | |
20 | Zhang Y W, Tian B Y, Wang Y H, et al. Simultaneous determination of 8 short-chain organic acids concentration in gastrointestinal content by high performance liquid chromatography with a ligand-exchange column. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(11): 7411-7420. |
张亚伟, 田博雅, 王月红, 等. 基于配体交换柱的高效液相色谱同时检测肠道内容物中8种短链有机酸浓度. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(11): 7411-7420. | |
21 | Chu X H, Hu J P, Wang Z G, et al. Effect of feeding of perilla seed extracts on growing-finishing pigs. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(3): 514-516. |
褚晓红, 胡锦平, 王志刚, 等. 添加紫苏籽提取物的饲料对生长肥育猪的饲喂效果. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(3): 514-516. | |
22 | Zhang W H, Dong G Z, Pan C X, et al. Effect of perilla seed extracts on performance and immune function on finishing cattle. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(3): 473-479. |
张文火, 董国忠, 潘存霞, 等. 紫苏籽提取物对育肥牛生产性能和免疫功能的影响. 动物营养学报, 2011, 23(3): 473-479. | |
23 | Wen H M, Sun P, Lv N N, et al. Effect of Perilla seed extract on growth performance, serum biochemical index, immunity and organ index of meat rabbits. Feed Research, 2023, 46(24): 56-60. |
温华梅, 孙鹏, 吕娜娜, 等. 紫苏籽提取物对肉兔生长性能、血清生化指标、免疫性能、器官指数的影响. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(24): 56-60. | |
24 | Liu C J, Wang G H, Li W L, et al. Effects of perilla cake on digestive tract structure and function, immunity and some lipid metabolism indexes of Andrias davidianus. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(9): 5391-5400. |
刘长江, 王光花, 李伟龙, 等. 紫苏饼对大鲵消化道结构功能、免疫及脂质代谢部分指标的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(9): 5391-5400. | |
25 | Liu R, Tang F, Ling H H, et al. The effect of perilla leaf oil on calcium ions and membrane potential in colon smooth muscle cells. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 2019, 30(6): 1302-1304. |
刘蓉, 唐芳, 凌海慧, 等. 紫苏叶油对结肠平滑肌细胞钙离子和膜电位的作用. 时珍国医国药, 2019, 30(6): 1302-1304. | |
26 | Fan Y X, Deng K P, Tantai W J, et al. Effect of selenium yeast in containing PUFAs dietary on fatty acid composition and antioxidant capacity of Hu lambs. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2018, 49(8): 1661-1673. |
樊懿萱, 邓凯平, 澹台文静, 等. 多不饱和脂肪酸日粮中添加酵母硒对湖羊脂肪酸组成和抗氧化的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(8): 1661-1673. | |
27 | Zhang S S. Effect of sunflower oil and tea oil on ruminal fermentation, milk fatty acid profile, and microbial population in lactating buffaloes. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2014. |
张双双. 添加葵花籽油和茶油对奶水牛瘤胃发酵, 脂肪酸组成以及相关瘤胃微生物数量的影响. 南宁: 广西大学, 2014. | |
28 | Wang X L, Shen X Z, Yang J H, et al. Effects of sunflower seed oil supplementation on rumen digestion and fatty acids composition in goats. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2007, 38(4): 351-361. |
王喜乐, 沈向真, 杨俊花, 等. 添喂葵花籽油对山羊瘤胃消化代谢与瘤胃液脂肪酸组成的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2007, 38(4): 351-361. | |
29 | Zhou J H, Zhou B, Wang Q Z, et al. Effects of sugarcane tops silage treated by different bacteria on rumen microbial diversity of Nubian goats. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2021, 52(2): 457-464. |
周俊华, 周波, 王启芝, 等. 不同菌剂处理青贮甘蔗尾叶对努比亚山羊瘤胃微生物群落的影响. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(2): 457-464. | |
30 | Zhao M D, Di L F, Tang Z Y, et al. Effects of tannin and feeding cellulase on rumen microflora of Hu sheep. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2019, 46(1): 112-122. |
赵梦迪, 邸凌峰, 唐泽宇, 等. 单宁与饲用纤维素酶对湖羊瘤胃微生物菌群的影响. 中国畜牧兽医, 2019, 46(1): 112-122. | |
31 | Jin L, Li S L, Zhang C Z, et al. Effect of different combinations of Artemisia polysaccharides on diversity of intestine microflora of Tan lambs. Feed Research, 2022, 2(20): 7-13. |
金鹿, 李胜利, 张崇志, 等. 沙蒿多糖组合制剂对滩羊羔羊肠道菌群多样性的影响. 饲料研究, 2022, 2(20): 7-13. | |
32 | Chen Y X. Effects of dietary marigold meal on performance, serum indexes, rumen fermentation and microflora of sheep. Alaer: Tarim University, 2023. |
陈颜旭. 饲粮添加万寿菊粕对绵羊生产性能、血清指标、瘤胃发酵和微生物区系的影响. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2023. | |
33 | Zhang Y. The effects of heat stress on the growth performance, meat quality, and rumen microorganism in Hu sheep. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2022. |
张瑜. 热应激对湖羊生长性能、肉品质及瘤胃微生物的影响. 南宁: 广西大学, 2022. | |
34 | Liu C, Wu H, Liu S J, et al. Dynamic alterations in yak rumen bacteria community and metabolome characteristics in response to feed type. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019(10): 01116. |
35 | Guo X L. Detection of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the pig gut and the correlation between their abundance and fat deposit. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2009. |
郭秀兰. 猪肠道硬壁菌门和拟杆菌门数量的检测及其相对丰度与脂肪沉积的相关性研究. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009. | |
36 | Golder H M, Denman S E, Mcsweeney C, et al. Effects of partial mixed rations and supplement amounts on milk production and composition, ruminal fermentation, bacterial communities, and ruminal acidosis. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(9): 5763-5785. |
37 | Zhong S, Ding Y, Wang Y, et al. Temperature and humidity index (THI)-induced rumen bacterial community changes in goats. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2019, 103(7): 3193-3203. |
38 | Zhao X Y, Tian Y J, Chen X X, et al. Advances in role and metabolic mechanism of Prevotella in rumen. Feed Research, 2023, 29(14): 151-153. |
赵欣雅, 田雨佳, 陈星星, 等. 普雷沃氏菌在瘤胃内的作用与代谢机制研究进展. 饲料研究, 2023, 29(14): 151-153. | |
39 | Wang J, Zhang L Q, Wang W L, et al. Effects of caragana fermented feed on growth performance and rumen flora of Ningxia Tan sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(2): 1035-1045. |
王锦, 张连全, 王文亮, 等. 柠条发酵饲料对宁夏滩羊生长性能及瘤胃微生物区系的影响. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(2): 1035-1045. | |
40 | Wang X F, He Z H, Liang X, et al. Effects of inulin and tannin supplementation on rumen volatile fatty acids and microflora of Hu sheep. Feed Industry, 2023, 44(2): 30-38. |
王小凤, 何兆华, 梁雪, 等. 添加菊粉和单宁对湖羊瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸和微生物区系的影响. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(2): 30-38. | |
41 | Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Fibrolytic rumen bacteria: their ecology and functions. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009, 22(1): 131-138. |
[1] | 杨得玉, 黄文植, 冯宇哲, 薛斌, 张晓卫, 崔占鸿. 暖季补饲矿物质盐砖对放牧牦牛生长性能、瘤胃发酵、血液和被毛矿物质含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(7): 105-118. |
[2] | 杨尚霖, 吴璇, 罗巧慧, 黄太华, 张正帆, 史海涛, 郭春华. 20~35 kg川中黑山羊蛋白质需要量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(7): 119-129. |
[3] | 党浩千, 覃娟清, 郭宇康, 张富, 王迎港, 刘庆华. 不同添加剂发酵笋壳对湖羊生产性能及瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(7): 135-148. |
[4] | 吴刀知才让, 裴成芳, 马志远, 刘红山, 曹旭亮, 刘虎, 周建伟. 燕麦干草不同饲喂水平对牦牛日增重、血液生理生化指标及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(11): 119-129. |
[5] | 戴东文, 庞凯悦, 王迅, 杨英魁, 柴沙驼, 王书祥. 精料补饲水平对暖季放牧牦牛瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(5): 169-177. |
[6] | 范玉洁, 司华哲, 王晓旭, 杨乾龙, 张新宇, 钟伟, 王凯英. 精氨酸水平对梅花鹿仔鹿瘤胃发酵参数和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(10): 154-166. |
[7] | 邹诗雨, 陈思葵, 唐启源, 陈东, 陈元伟, 邓攀, 黄胥莱, 李付强. 青贮剂对再生稻头季全株青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 122-132. |
[8] | 黄丽琴, 李松桥, 袁振中, 唐晶, 闫景彩, 唐启源. 全株水稻与平菇菌糠共发酵料对浏阳黑山羊屠宰性能、肉品质和器官指数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 133-140. |
[9] | 霍俊宏, 詹康, 黄秋生, 钟小军, 占今舜, 严学兵. 不同精粗比日粮对山羊生产性能、血清生化指标和瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 151-161. |
[10] | 李晨, Ahmad Anum Ali, 张剑搏, 梁泽毅, 丁学智, 阎萍. 冷季牦牛和黄牛采食行为、血清生化指标与瘤胃发酵参数的比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 162-169. |
[11] | 李宏, 宋淑珍, 高良霜, 郎侠, 刘立山, 宫旭胤, 魏玉兵, 吴建平. 饲养水平对阿勒泰羊胃肠道发育、瘤胃发酵参数及瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 180-190. |
[12] | 董利锋, 杨修竹, 高彦华, 李斌昌, 王贝, 刁其玉. 日粮不同NDF/NFC水平对周岁后荷斯坦奶牛生产性能、营养物质消化率、瘤胃发酵特征和甲烷排放的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 156-165. |
[13] | 王继卿, 沈继源, 刘秀, 李少斌, 罗玉柱, 赵孟丽, 郝志云, 柯娜, 宋宜泽, 乔莉蓉. 子午岭黑山羊与辽宁绒山羊产肉性能、肉品质、肌肉营养成分和脂肪酸含量比较[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 166-177. |
[14] | 张剑搏, 丁考仁青, 梁泽毅, Anum-aliAhmad, 杜梅, 郑娟善, 丁学智. 早期营养干预对幼龄反刍动物瘤胃微生物区系发育的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 199-211. |
[15] | 李雄雄, 焦婷, 赵生国, 秦伟娜, 高雪梅, 王正文, 吴建平, 雷赵民. 牛至精油与有机钴协同对青贮玉米秸秆降解及绵羊瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11): 191-202. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||