Welcome to Acta Prataculturae Sinica ! Today is

Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 161-173.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024452

Previous Articles    

Effects of intercropping planting patterns and nitrogen addition level on nitrogen absorption and biomass within oat-pea intercropping systems

Gen-sheng BAO1,2,3(), Yuan LI1,2,3, Xiao-yun FENG1,2,3, Qian ZHAO1,2,3   

  1. 1.Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,Qinghai University,Xining 810003,China
    2.Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,Xining 810016,China
    3.Key Laboratory of Superior Forage Germplasm in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,Xining 810016,China
  • Received:2024-11-18 Revised:2025-03-17 Online:2025-11-20 Published:2025-10-09
  • Contact: Gen-sheng BAO

Abstract:

Oats intercropped with peas has been regarded as an important method to improve the productivity of artificial grassland. Similarly, nitrogen fertilization is also recommended as an effective cultivation practice in increasing forage productivity for artificial grasslands. However, few studies have examined the interactive effects of different intercropping planting patterns and nitrogen addition levels on forage yields and the capacity for nitrogen absorption in oat-pea intercropping systems. A field experiment was carried out to examine the role of different intercropping patterns (monocropping, mixed monocropping, alternate-row intercropping) and nitrogen addition (control, low and high level) in improving forage biomass and increasing nitrogen uptake within intercropping systems comprising oats and peas. Our results showed 1) Both above- and belowground biomass of oats was highest when oats were intercropped with peas in an alternate-row pattern. Conversely, oat above- and belowground biomass was minimum when peas and oats were combined in a mixed intercropping system. Furthermore, both oat leaves and stem and oat root total nitrogen content and soil available nitrogen content were significantly increased when oats were intercropped with peas, while root nitrogen and soil available nitrogen contents of peas were lowest when peas were cultivated as a monocrop. 2) Root total nitrogen contents of oats and peas when monocropped were significantly higher than in the counterpart plants in alternate-row intercropped plantings. By contrast, soil NH4+-N and NO3--N contents of oats and peas in mixed intercropped plantings were markedly higher than those in monocropped and alternate-row intercropped systems. 3) Structural equation model (SEM) results indicated that intercropping and nitrogen addition both had a positive effect on oat biomass accumulation and enhanced nitrogen absorption in leaves, stems and soil, while resulting in negative effects on pea biomass and nitrogen contents in aboveground tissues and soil. In conclusion, the forage productivity of artificial grasslands in alpine regions achieves maximum productivity when exploiting the interactive effects of oat alternate-row intercropping with peas, with the addition of a low amount of nitrogen fertilizer (50 kg·ha-1). Our findings suggest that grass intercropping with legumes together with modest exogenous nitrogen addition is an ideal cultivation practice to enhance the productivity of artificial grassland in alpine regions.

Key words: oats, pea, intercropping, nitrogen addition, nitrogen absorption