Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 70-84.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024292
Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiao-jing NING1(
), Qiu-jie REN1, Li-juan WANG1, Xiao-lin JIA1, Xiao-jun SHI1,2,3, Jie WANG1,2,3(
)
Received:2024-07-23
Revised:2024-09-20
Online:2025-06-20
Published:2025-04-03
Contact:
Jie WANG
Xiao-jing NING, Qiu-jie REN, Li-juan WANG, Xiao-lin JIA, Xiao-jun SHI, Jie WANG. Effects of different pelleted seed coating formulations on seed germination and seedling growth of three brewing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 70-84.
| 处理Treatment | 助剂配方(体积比)Additive formulation (volume ratio) |
|---|---|
| A1 | 15%阿拉伯胶∶硅藻土=5∶11。15% concentration gum arabic∶diatomite=5∶11. |
| A2 | 20%阿拉伯胶∶硅藻土=5∶11。20% concentration gum arabic∶diatomite=5∶11. |
| A3 | 25%阿拉伯胶∶硅藻土=5∶11。25% concentration gum arabic∶diatomite=5∶11. |
| W1 | 丸粒化粉∶硅藻土=2∶8。Pellet powder∶diatomite=2∶8. |
| W2 | 丸粒化粉∶硅藻土=3∶7。Pellet powder∶diatomite=3∶7. |
| W3 | 丸粒化粉∶硅藻土=4∶6。Pellet powder∶diatomite=4∶6. |
Table 1 Auxiliary treatment of pelletizing seed coating agent
| 处理Treatment | 助剂配方(体积比)Additive formulation (volume ratio) |
|---|---|
| A1 | 15%阿拉伯胶∶硅藻土=5∶11。15% concentration gum arabic∶diatomite=5∶11. |
| A2 | 20%阿拉伯胶∶硅藻土=5∶11。20% concentration gum arabic∶diatomite=5∶11. |
| A3 | 25%阿拉伯胶∶硅藻土=5∶11。25% concentration gum arabic∶diatomite=5∶11. |
| W1 | 丸粒化粉∶硅藻土=2∶8。Pellet powder∶diatomite=2∶8. |
| W2 | 丸粒化粉∶硅藻土=3∶7。Pellet powder∶diatomite=3∶7. |
| W3 | 丸粒化粉∶硅藻土=4∶6。Pellet powder∶diatomite=4∶6. |
| 处理Treatment | 生物活性物质Bioactive substance |
|---|---|
| CK | 裸种 Bare species |
| M1 | 添加杀菌剂 Add bactericide |
| M2 | 添加杀菌剂∶杀虫剂=1∶1。 Add bactericide∶insecticide=1∶1. |
| M3 | 添加杀菌剂∶杀虫剂∶植物生长调节剂=1∶1∶1。Add bactericide∶insecticide∶plant growth regulator=1∶1∶1. |
Table 2 Treatment with the addition of bioactive substance
| 处理Treatment | 生物活性物质Bioactive substance |
|---|---|
| CK | 裸种 Bare species |
| M1 | 添加杀菌剂 Add bactericide |
| M2 | 添加杀菌剂∶杀虫剂=1∶1。 Add bactericide∶insecticide=1∶1. |
| M3 | 添加杀菌剂∶杀虫剂∶植物生长调节剂=1∶1∶1。Add bactericide∶insecticide∶plant growth regulator=1∶1∶1. |
| 处理Treatment | 功能材料Functional materials |
|---|---|
| CK1 | 裸种 Bare species |
| CK2 | 不添加功能材料 No functional materials are added |
| MH1 | 添加0.1%浓度海藻酸 Add 0.1% concentration alginic acid |
| MH2 | 添加0.3%浓度海藻酸 Add 0.3% concentration alginic acid |
| MH3 | 添加0.5%浓度海藻酸 Add 0.5% concentration alginic acid |
| MS1 | 添加质量占比0.5%的SAP。Add super absorbent polymer (SAP) with a mass ratio of 0.5%. |
| MS2 | 添加质量占比1%的SAP。Add super absorbent polymer (SAP) with a mass ratio of 1%. |
| MS3 | 添加质量占比2%的SAP。Add super absorbent polymer (SAP) with a mass ratio of 2%. |
Table 3 Treatment with the addition of functional materials
| 处理Treatment | 功能材料Functional materials |
|---|---|
| CK1 | 裸种 Bare species |
| CK2 | 不添加功能材料 No functional materials are added |
| MH1 | 添加0.1%浓度海藻酸 Add 0.1% concentration alginic acid |
| MH2 | 添加0.3%浓度海藻酸 Add 0.3% concentration alginic acid |
| MH3 | 添加0.5%浓度海藻酸 Add 0.5% concentration alginic acid |
| MS1 | 添加质量占比0.5%的SAP。Add super absorbent polymer (SAP) with a mass ratio of 0.5%. |
| MS2 | 添加质量占比1%的SAP。Add super absorbent polymer (SAP) with a mass ratio of 1%. |
| MS3 | 添加质量占比2%的SAP。Add super absorbent polymer (SAP) with a mass ratio of 2%. |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 单籽率Single seed rate | 有籽率Containing seed rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 mm | 5 mm | 4 mm | 6 mm | 5 mm | 4 mm | ||
金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | A1 | 99.00±1.00a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.67±0.58a | 99.00±1.00a | 97.67±0.58ab |
| A2 | 98.33±0.58ab | 98.67±1.53a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.16a | 98.33±1.53ab | |
| A3 | 96.33±1.15b | 99.00±1.00a | 99.33±1.16a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.15a | |
| W1 | 97.67±0.58ab | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.16a | 97.67±0.58ab | |
| W2 | 97.67±1.16ab | 99.33±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.00±1.00a | 96.67±1.53b | |
| W3 | 97.67±1.52ab | 99.33±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±1.16a | 94.33±1.16c | |
泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | A1 | 98.33±0.58ab | 98.67±1.15ab | 99.33±1.15a | 99.67±0.58a | 99.00±1.00a | 96.33±1.15ab |
| A2 | 98.00±1.00ab | 97.00±1.00bc | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.67±0.58a | 98.00±1.00ab | |
| A3 | 96.67±1.53b | 96.00±1.00c | 98.67±1.53a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.00±1.00a | |
| W1 | 99.67±0.58a | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±0.58a | 99.00±1.73a | |
| W2 | 98.33±1.53ab | 97.67±0.58abc | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±0.58a | 97.33±1.53ab | |
| W3 | 97.67±1.15ab | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.15a | 99.33±1.15a | 96.00±2.00b | |
红缨子 Hongyingzi | A1 | 99.00±1.00ab | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±0.58b | 99.33±1.15a | 97.67±1.15b |
| A2 | 98.00±1.73ab | 98.33±1.53a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.67±0.58ab | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±1.53ab | |
| A3 | 97.67±0.58ab | 95.33±0.58b | 99.33±0.58b | 99.33±1.15ab | 100.00±0.00a | 98.00±1.00ab | |
| W1 | 99.33±0.58a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | |
| W2 | 97.00±1.00b | 98.33±0.58a | 99.67±0.58ab | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±1.53ab | 98.33±1.15ab | |
| W3 | 97.67±1.15ab | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±0.58ab | 97.00±1.00b | 96.67±1.53b | |
Table 4 Effects of different auxiliary treatments on seed content and single seed percentage of pelleted sorghum seeds (%)
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 单籽率Single seed rate | 有籽率Containing seed rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 mm | 5 mm | 4 mm | 6 mm | 5 mm | 4 mm | ||
金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | A1 | 99.00±1.00a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.67±0.58a | 99.00±1.00a | 97.67±0.58ab |
| A2 | 98.33±0.58ab | 98.67±1.53a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.16a | 98.33±1.53ab | |
| A3 | 96.33±1.15b | 99.00±1.00a | 99.33±1.16a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.15a | |
| W1 | 97.67±0.58ab | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.16a | 97.67±0.58ab | |
| W2 | 97.67±1.16ab | 99.33±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.00±1.00a | 96.67±1.53b | |
| W3 | 97.67±1.52ab | 99.33±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±1.16a | 94.33±1.16c | |
泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | A1 | 98.33±0.58ab | 98.67±1.15ab | 99.33±1.15a | 99.67±0.58a | 99.00±1.00a | 96.33±1.15ab |
| A2 | 98.00±1.00ab | 97.00±1.00bc | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.67±0.58a | 98.00±1.00ab | |
| A3 | 96.67±1.53b | 96.00±1.00c | 98.67±1.53a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.00±1.00a | |
| W1 | 99.67±0.58a | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±0.58a | 99.00±1.73a | |
| W2 | 98.33±1.53ab | 97.67±0.58abc | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±0.58a | 97.33±1.53ab | |
| W3 | 97.67±1.15ab | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±1.15a | 99.33±1.15a | 96.00±2.00b | |
红缨子 Hongyingzi | A1 | 99.00±1.00ab | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±0.58b | 99.33±1.15a | 97.67±1.15b |
| A2 | 98.00±1.73ab | 98.33±1.53a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.67±0.58ab | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±1.53ab | |
| A3 | 97.67±0.58ab | 95.33±0.58b | 99.33±0.58b | 99.33±1.15ab | 100.00±0.00a | 98.00±1.00ab | |
| W1 | 99.33±0.58a | 99.67±0.58a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | |
| W2 | 97.00±1.00b | 98.33±0.58a | 99.67±0.58ab | 100.00±0.00a | 98.67±1.53ab | 98.33±1.15ab | |
| W3 | 97.67±1.15ab | 99.00±1.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 99.33±0.58ab | 97.00±1.00b | 96.67±1.53b | |
品种 Variety | 粒径 Particle size (mm) | 单籽率均值 Average single seed rate (%) | 5%显著水平 5% significant level | 1%极显著水平 1% extremely significant level | 有籽率均值 Average containing seed rate (%) | 5%显著水平 5% significant level | 1%极显著水平 1% extremely significant level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | 6 | 97.78 | b | B | 99.89 | a | A |
| 5 | 99.28 | a | A | 99.22 | a | A | |
| 4 | 99.83 | a | A | 97.33 | b | B | |
泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | 6 | 98.11 | b | B | 99.83 | a | A |
| 5 | 97.89 | b | B | 99.33 | a | A | |
| 4 | 99.67 | a | A | 97.61 | b | B | |
红缨子 Hongyingzi | 6 | 98.10 | b | A | 99.50 | a | A |
| 5 | 98.28 | b | A | 99.00 | ab | A | |
| 4 | 99.83 | a | A | 98.22 | b | A |
Table 5 Effects of different particle size treatments on seed content and single seed percentage of pelleted sorghum seeds
品种 Variety | 粒径 Particle size (mm) | 单籽率均值 Average single seed rate (%) | 5%显著水平 5% significant level | 1%极显著水平 1% extremely significant level | 有籽率均值 Average containing seed rate (%) | 5%显著水平 5% significant level | 1%极显著水平 1% extremely significant level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | 6 | 97.78 | b | B | 99.89 | a | A |
| 5 | 99.28 | a | A | 99.22 | a | A | |
| 4 | 99.83 | a | A | 97.33 | b | B | |
泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | 6 | 98.11 | b | B | 99.83 | a | A |
| 5 | 97.89 | b | B | 99.33 | a | A | |
| 4 | 99.67 | a | A | 97.61 | b | B | |
红缨子 Hongyingzi | 6 | 98.10 | b | A | 99.50 | a | A |
| 5 | 98.28 | b | A | 99.00 | ab | A | |
| 4 | 99.83 | a | A | 98.22 | b | A |
处理 Treatment | 金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | 泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | 红缨子 Hongyingzi |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 88.5±2.12bc | 73.0±1.41b | 68.5±2.12c |
| M1 | 87.0±2.83c | 73.0±1.41b | 67.5±0.71c |
| M2 | 93.0±1.41ab | 88.0±0.00a | 75.5±2.12b |
| M3 | 95.0±1.41a | 91.0±1.41a | 84.5±0.71a |
Table 6 Effects of different bioactive substances on seedling emergence rate of brewing sorghum seed (%)
处理 Treatment | 金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | 泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | 红缨子 Hongyingzi |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 88.5±2.12bc | 73.0±1.41b | 68.5±2.12c |
| M1 | 87.0±2.83c | 73.0±1.41b | 67.5±0.71c |
| M2 | 93.0±1.41ab | 88.0±0.00a | 75.5±2.12b |
| M3 | 95.0±1.41a | 91.0±1.41a | 84.5±0.71a |
处理 Treatment | 金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | 泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | 红缨子 Hongyingzi |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 88.5±2.12d | 73.0±1.41c | 68.5±2.12d |
| CK2 | 95.0±1.41c | 91.0±1.41b | 84.5±0.71c |
| MH1 | 99.5±0.71a | 95.5±2.12ab | 93.0±2.83ab |
| MH2 | 98.5±0.71ab | 98.0±1.41a | 96.0±4.24a |
| MH3 | 95.0±0.00c | 94.5±3.54ab | 91.0±2.83abc |
| MS1 | 96.0±1.41bc | 92.0±2.83b | 88.5±3.54bc |
| MS2 | 96.5±0.71abc | 94.0±1.41ab | 91.5±2.12ab |
| MS3 | 98.0±1.41abc | 95.0±1.41ab | 94.0±2.83ab |
Table 7 Effects of different functional materials on seed emergence rate of brewing sorghum (%)
处理 Treatment | 金糯粱9号 Jinnuoliang No.9 | 泸糯8号 Lunuo No.8 | 红缨子 Hongyingzi |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 88.5±2.12d | 73.0±1.41c | 68.5±2.12d |
| CK2 | 95.0±1.41c | 91.0±1.41b | 84.5±0.71c |
| MH1 | 99.5±0.71a | 95.5±2.12ab | 93.0±2.83ab |
| MH2 | 98.5±0.71ab | 98.0±1.41a | 96.0±4.24a |
| MH3 | 95.0±0.00c | 94.5±3.54ab | 91.0±2.83abc |
| MS1 | 96.0±1.41bc | 92.0±2.83b | 88.5±3.54bc |
| MS2 | 96.5±0.71abc | 94.0±1.41ab | 91.5±2.12ab |
| MS3 | 98.0±1.41abc | 95.0±1.41ab | 94.0±2.83ab |
| 1 | Hattori T, Inanaga S, Araki H, et al. Application of silicon enhanced drought tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Physiologia Plantarum, 2005, 123(4): 459-466. |
| 2 | Cheng H J, Yan F Z, Ma S Y, et al. Causes and preventive measures affecting the decline of sorghum seed emergence rate. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(4): 112. |
| 成慧娟, 严福忠, 马尚耀, 等. 影响高粱种子出苗率下降的原因及预防措施. 内蒙古农业科技, 2011(4): 112. | |
| 3 | Zou X, Zhou Y F, Li G, et al. Study on the regulatory effect of exogenous melatonin on the physiological metabolism of sorghum under drought stress. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 44(4): 24-31. |
| 邹询, 周宇飞, 李广, 等. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下高粱生理代谢的调节效应研究. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(4): 24-31. | |
| 4 | Fan J. Preparation and biological effect evaluation of sorghum medicine fertilizer compound seed coating agent. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2022. |
| 樊娟. 高粱药肥复合种衣剂的研制及生物学效应评价. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022. | |
| 5 | He Z X, Mao P S, Sun Y, et al. Review of grass seeds coating technology. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(2): 270-277. |
| 何祖欣, 毛培胜, 孙彦, 等. 草类种子包衣技术现状综述. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 270-277. | |
| 6 | Zhou Y R. Study on pelleting technology and effect of flax seed. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2015. |
| 周玉瑞. 胡麻种子丸粒化技术效果的研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2015. | |
| 7 | Chen K, Han B H, Lu D P, et al. Effect of pelleting processing technology on the quality of cabbage seeds. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2019, 40(8): 82-88. |
| 陈凯, 韩柏和, 陆岱鹏, 等. 甘蓝种子丸粒化包衣加工工艺及其对品质的影响. 中国农机化学报, 2019, 40(8): 82-88. | |
| 8 | Xiong T F, Lin Q S, Feng X. Effects of seed pelletized coating of plant growth regulators on seedling quality of choy sum. Seed, 2022, 41(6): 102-106. |
| 熊腾飞, 林庆胜, 冯夏. 植物生长调节剂种子丸粒化包衣对菜心种苗质量的影响. 种子, 2022, 41(6): 102-106. | |
| 9 | Chen D X, Zhou L Y, Chen Q J, et al. Study on pelletizing and coating technology of rape seed. Seed, 2004(7): 85-86. |
| 陈德星, 周立友, 陈其军, 等. 油菜种子丸粒化包衣技术研究. 种子, 2004(7): 85-86. | |
| 10 | Wang W C, Wang R H, Gao Y J, et al. Exploration on processing technology of sugar beet seed pelleting. China Sugar, 2016, 38(5): 46-48, 51. |
| 王维成, 王荣华, 高有军, 等. 甜菜种子丸粒化加工技术初探. 中国糖料, 2016, 38(5): 46-48, 51. | |
| 11 | Zhang Y C, Zhou X F, Li Q Y, et al. Research on practical application technology of seed pelletizing. China Cotton, 2001(5): 15-17. |
| 张彦才, 周晓芬, 李巧云, 等. 棉种丸粒化的实际应用技术研究. 中国棉花, 2001(5): 15-17. | |
| 12 | Wu Y X. Effects of seed pelleting on seed germination and seedling growth of sorghum under salt stress. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2023. |
| 武宇昕. 盐胁迫下丸化对高粱种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2023. | |
| 13 | Jiang L T. Study on drought-resistant coating agent of buffalograss seeds. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2020. |
| 蒋丽婷. 野牛草种子抗旱包衣剂研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2020. | |
| 14 | Yang L F, Gao H D, Gu M Y, et al. Screening of pellet formulas for Caragana korshinskii Kom. seeds. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(5): 9-15. |
| 杨丽芳, 高捍东, 顾美影, 等. 柠条种子丸粒化配方的筛选. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(5): 9-15. | |
| 15 | Tong L R, Ni S G, Zhou Y N, et al. Effects of different seed coating formulations on seed germination and seedling growth of Lespedeza davurica. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 124-134. |
| 佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 周亚楠, 等. 不同种衣剂配方对达乌里胡枝子种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 124-134. | |
| 16 | Zhi J Z, Bi X H, Du K M, et al. Rules for agricultural seed testing, GB/T 3543.1-3543.7-1995. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1995: 8-12. |
| 支巨振, 毕辛华, 杜克敏, 等. 农作物种子检验规程, GB/T 3543.1-3543.7-1995. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1995: 8-12. | |
| 17 | Xiong Y F, Wen Z Y, Jiang J A, et al. Advance of studies on seed coating agents for crops. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2004(2): 187-192. |
| 熊远福, 文祝友, 江巨鳌, 等. 农作物种衣剂研究进展. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004(2): 187-192. | |
| 18 | Butler R. Coatings, films and treatments. Seed World, 1993(10): 18-24. |
| 19 | Taylor A G, Grabe D F, Paine D H. Moisture content and water activity determination of pelleted and film-coated seeds. Seed Technology, 1997(19): 24-32. |
| 20 | Shen J H. Study on the method of pelletizing and coating the seed for Seriphidium borotalense. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 申镓豪. 博洛塔绢蒿种子丸粒化包衣方法研究. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021. | |
| 21 | Huang C, Zhang H, Zhao Y, et al. Diatomite-supported Pd-M (M=Cu, Co, Ni) bimetal nanocatalysts for selective hydrogenation of long-chain aliphatic esters. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 386(1): 60-65. |
| 22 | Wang Z M, Wu J K, Ma X F, et al. Study on pesticide carrier of diatomite granule. Agrochemicals, 1989(3): 9-10. |
| 王泽民, 吴吉昆, 马小凡, 等. 硅藻土作粒剂农药载体的研究. 农药, 1989(3): 9-10. | |
| 23 | Li C Y, Zhang F, Liu C H, et al. Screening on coating materials of the forage seeds. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2013, 44(4): 94-100. |
| 李成云, 张帆, 刘彩红, 等. 牧草种子包衣材料的筛选. 东北农业大学学报, 2013, 44(4): 94-100. | |
| 24 | Peng Z D, Bai W B, Zhao J W, et al. Research on sorghum seed pelleting prescription. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(12): 5-8. |
| 彭之东, 白文斌, 赵建武, 等. 高粱种子丸粒化配方研究. 农学学报, 2015, 5(12): 5-8. | |
| 25 | Zhang M, Wu Y, Dong S, et al. Effects of seed coating and pelleting on the emergence of sorghum for wine. Seed, 2023, 42(4): 139-144. |
| 张民, 伍雨, 董帅, 等. 种子包衣和丸粒化处理对酒用高粱出苗的影响. 种子, 2023, 42(4): 139-144. | |
| 26 | Li H Z. Study on the pelletized coating of Elymus nutans seeds. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 李会周. 垂穗披碱草种子丸粒化包衣研究. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021. | |
| 27 | Wang Y. Study on seed coating techniques of four typical desert plants. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. |
| 王洋. 四种典型荒漠植物种子包衣技术研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018. | |
| 28 | Wang R, Gao W, Wang K G. Effects of seed dressing with different pesticides on wheat growth and control efficiency of wheat diseases and insect pests. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(3): 398-408. |
| 王睿, 高炜, 王克功. 不同种衣剂对小麦生长及病虫害防治效果的影响. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(3): 398-408. | |
| 29 | Wei H T, Li J, Tang Y L, et al. Effect of seed dressing of tebuconazole on seed germination of different wheat varieties. Seed, 2018, 37(8): 27-30. |
| 魏会廷, 李俊, 汤永禄, 等. 戊唑醇拌种对不同小麦品种种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2018, 37(8): 27-30. | |
| 30 | Zhang X L, Zhang H, Liu Y, et al. Effects of seed dressing agent+brassinolide on growth and yield of maize at seedling stage. Hebei Agriculture, 2020(10): 41-42. |
| 张秀立, 张徽, 刘媛, 等. 种衣剂+芸苔素内酯拌种对玉米苗期长势及产量的影响. 河北农业, 2020(10): 41-42. | |
| 31 | Wang R J. The study on the control effect of composite application of BR on root-knot nematode in tomato. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2017. |
| 王瑞娇. 芸苔素内酯的复合应用对番茄根结线虫抑制效果的研究. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2017. | |
| 32 | Zhou Y, Huang J, Wu Y, et al. Effects of sowing date on the growth and yield of direct seeding sorghum of different varieties. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2019, 34(3): 384-392. |
| 周瑜, 黄娟, 吴毓, 等. 播期对直播高粱生长发育及产量的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 34(3): 384-392. | |
| 33 | Hu X P. Study on characteristics of the drought in nearly 50 years and causes of continuous drought during winter half year in southwest China. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2015. |
| 胡学平. 近50年中国西南地区干旱变化特征及冬半年持续干旱成因研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2015. | |
| 34 | Hernández-Herrera R M, Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F, Zañudo-Hernández J, et al. Activity of seaweed extracts and polysaccharide-enriched extracts from Ulva lactuca and Padina gymnospora as growth promoters of tomato and mung bean plants. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2016, 28(4): 2549-2560. |
| 35 | Sarrocco S, Raeta R, Vannacci G. Seeds encapsulation in calcium alginate pellets. Seed Science and Technology, 2004, 32(3): 649-661. |
| 36 | Skrzypczak D, Jarzembowski Ł, Izydorczyk G, et al. Hydrogel alginate seed coating as an innovative method for delivering nutrients at the early stages of plant growth. Polymers, 2021, 13(23): 4233. |
| 37 | Ji Z Z, Tan Y, Huang Z J, et al. Effects of seed coating agent based on alginic acid on seed vigor, antioxidant enzyme system and yield of sweet corn. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 37(11): 2297-2304. |
| 吉状状, 谭韵, 黄众基, 等. 基于海藻酸的包衣剂对甜玉米种子活力、抗氧化酶系统和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2023, 37(11): 2297-2304. | |
| 38 | Li M X, Chen Y L, Wang X F, et al. Effect of 8 kinds of seed-coating agents on the germination and safety of Euryale ferox. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(1): 144-147. |
| 李美霞, 陈亚丽, 王晓飞, 等. 8种种衣剂对芡实种子发芽及安全性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(1): 144-147. |
| [1] | Yu-qi ZHENG, Jia-yue YAN, Bo-yuan LI, Yan WEI. Dispersal unit morphology, and effects of burial depth on seed germination and emergence of Stipa sareptana [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 64-73. |
| [2] | Li-fen HAO, Xiao-yang XU, Yu JI, Rui WANG, De-bao WU, Yu-yu LI, Ke-jian LIN. Comparison of the dynamic morphological and physiological characteristics of twin seeds during the germination of field sandbur [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 40-50. |
| [3] | Ting-ting ZHANG, Yu-le LIU, Hong CHEN, Ling-xin XU, Xiang-wei CHEN, En-heng WANG, Jun-xin YAN. Effects of different exogenous substances on the seed germination, seedling growth, and physiology of Melilotus suaveolens under salt, alkali, and drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 122-132. |
| [4] | Bang-yin HE, Jing-hong PEI, Qi-rui YE, Jia-jia HU, Cai-xue ZHENG, Jiang-wen LI. Allelopathic effects of different artificial economic forest litter extracts on Fabaceae and Poaceae species [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 199-208. |
| [5] | Kun-fei RUAN, Tian-qi WANG, Ning-ning BI, Shao-tong SHI, Sen LI, Zhong-hua LIU. Allelopathic effects of aqueous extracts of fallen leaves of Acer truncatum on three medicinal plants [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(7): 151-159. |
| [6] | Jin-zhu GAO, Dong-hao ZHAO, Le GAO, Xi-hao SU, Xue-qing HE. Effects of cerium nitrate and abscisic acid treatment on alfalfa seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(6): 175-186. |
| [7] | Yu-ying WANG, Pei-fang CHONG, Jian-xi ZHANG, Hang-hang LIU, Xin-guang BAO, Xue-ying WANG. Allelopathic effects of aqueous extracts from Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina on seedling growth [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(12): 99-110. |
| [8] | Shao-ying MA, Gui-ping CHEN, Na WANG, Lei MA, Rong-fang LIAN, Sheng LI, Xu-cheng ZHANG. Identification of potential autotoxic substances in pea soil and analysis of their autotoxic effects [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 134-145. |
| [9] | Shi-min ZHANG, Jiao-yang ZHAO, Hui-sen ZHU, Kai WEI, Yong-xin WANG. Effects of selenium on metabolic transformation and morphogenesis in different varieties of alfalfa during the germination stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 79-90. |
| [10] | Ting-lun LI, Yi-heng LI, Hui YU, Zai-li JIANG, Li-tao TANG, Chang-ting WANG, Lei HU. Effects of the lead halide perovskite on the seedling growth of Elymus nutans [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(12): 160-170. |
| [11] | Wen-jie QU, Wen-zhi ZHAO, Lei WANG, Jian-jun QU, Xin-guo YANG. Response of germination and seedling survival of two shrubs to simulated dry-wet treatments [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 179-187. |
| [12] | Xiang LI, Meng ZHANG, Chun-zeng LIU, Yi-fei ZHU, Xiao-xin YE. Effects of dialectric barrier discharge plasma treatment on seed germination and physiological characteristics of Astragalus sinicus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 129-140. |
| [13] | Jiao-yun LU, Hong TIAN, He-shan ZHANG, Jun-bo XIONG, Yang LIU, Zhen-nan WANG. Effects of H2O2 immersion on seed germination and seedling growth of alfalfa under salt stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 141-152. |
| [14] | Qi-bo TAO, Xi-hu QIE, Qian ZHANG, Yu-xuan GAO, Ya-qi ZHANG, Rui-zhen ZHANG, Xiao-fei CHEN, Tian-xiu NIU, Xiao-tong SUN, Yu-ting NIE, Ya-ru LIU, Jia-qi HU, Shang-zhi ZHONG, Juan SUN. Research progress on vigor estimation for forage seeds [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 200-225. |
| [15] | Hao-yu XU, Ying ZHAO, Qian RUAN, Xiao-lin ZHU, Bao-qiang WANG, Xiao-hong WEI. Resistance of quinoa seedlings under different salt-alkali stress levels [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 122-130. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||