Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 87-97.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020413
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zheng-yu YANG(), Zhong-jie LU, Mao ZHANG, Rui DONG()
Received:
2020-09-14
Revised:
2020-11-10
Online:
2021-10-19
Published:
2021-10-19
Contact:
Rui DONG
Zheng-yu YANG, Zhong-jie LU, Mao ZHANG, Rui DONG. A digital image analysis of seed phenotypic traits of 132 Lespedeza accessions[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 87-97.
种Species | 种质数目Number of accession |
---|---|
细梗胡枝子Lespedeza virgata | 2 |
绒毛胡枝子Lespedeza tomentosa | 2 |
日本胡枝子Lespedeza thunbergii | 2 |
Lespedeza spp. | 1 |
铁马鞭Lespedeza pilosa | 1 |
Lespedeza patentibicolor | 1 |
宽叶胡枝子Lespedeza maximowiczii | 1 |
尖叶铁扫帚Lespedeza juncea | 7 |
Lespedeza intermixta | 1 |
Lespedeza divaricata | 2 |
兴安胡枝子Lespedeza daurica | 3 |
短梗胡枝子Lespedeza cyrtobotrya | 3 |
截叶铁扫帚Lespedeza cuneata | 42 |
头状胡枝子Lespedeza capitata | 51 |
二色胡枝子Lespedeza bicolor | 10 |
中国野生种质GY01 (WL) | 1 |
Table 1 Number distribution of Lespedeza germplasm
种Species | 种质数目Number of accession |
---|---|
细梗胡枝子Lespedeza virgata | 2 |
绒毛胡枝子Lespedeza tomentosa | 2 |
日本胡枝子Lespedeza thunbergii | 2 |
Lespedeza spp. | 1 |
铁马鞭Lespedeza pilosa | 1 |
Lespedeza patentibicolor | 1 |
宽叶胡枝子Lespedeza maximowiczii | 1 |
尖叶铁扫帚Lespedeza juncea | 7 |
Lespedeza intermixta | 1 |
Lespedeza divaricata | 2 |
兴安胡枝子Lespedeza daurica | 3 |
短梗胡枝子Lespedeza cyrtobotrya | 3 |
截叶铁扫帚Lespedeza cuneata | 42 |
头状胡枝子Lespedeza capitata | 51 |
二色胡枝子Lespedeza bicolor | 10 |
中国野生种质GY01 (WL) | 1 |
项目 Item | 性状 Traits | 种长 SL (mm) | 种宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
132份胡枝子种质 132 Lespedeza germplasm | 平均值Average | 2.216 | 1.696 | 1.305 | 1.050 | 0.589 | 0.281 | 5.153 |
最大值Max | 3.965 | 2.992 | 1.833 | 1.907 | 1.090 | 1.112 | 5.751 | |
最小值Min | 1.468 | 1.168 | 1.174 | 0.737 | 0.333 | 0.101 | 3.901 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.249±0.031 | 0.121±0.015 | 0.007±0.001 | 0.045±0.006 | 0.005±0.001 | 0.030±0.004 | 1.943±0.242 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.013±0.001 | 0.006±0.001 | 0.008±0.001 | 0.003±0.000 | 0.005±0.000 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.056±0.005 | |
平均重复性R | 0.983 | 0.984 | 0.677 | 0.979 | 0.783 | 0.997 | 0.990 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 23.02 | 20.96 | 8.99 | 20.85 | 17.01 | 61.53 | 22.94 | |
芥菜胡枝子 L. juncea | 平均值Average | 1.857 | 1.456 | 1.277 | 0.882 | 0.582 | 0.261 | 5.150 |
最大值Max | 2.187 | 1.566 | 1.550 | 1.090 | 0.717 | 0.601 | 5.750 | |
最小值Min | 1.637 | 1.270 | 1.113 | 0.760 | 0.397 | 0.133 | 3.900 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.001 | 0.048 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.000 | 0.008 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.021±0.014 | 0.003±0.003 | 0.008±0.006 | 0.009±0.006 | 0.004±0.003 | 0.029±0.017 | 0.100±0.043 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.008±0.003 | 0.005±0.002 | 0.007±0.003 | 0.002±0.001 | 0.003±0.001 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.096±0.036 | |
平均重复性R | 0.893 | 0.620 | 0.795 | 0.942 | 0.812 | 0.999 | 0.758 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 9.02 | 5.89 | 9.16 | 11.49 | 14.24 | 61.95 | 8.13 | |
截叶铁扫帚 L. cuneata | 平均值Average | 1.747 | 1.414 | 1.238 | 0.930 | 0.562 | 0.163 | 4.880 |
最大值Max | 2.131 | 1.806 | 1.559 | 1.223 | 0.863 | 0.302 | 6.120 | |
最小值Min | 1.468 | 1.168 | 1.010 | 0.737 | 0.393 | 0.101 | 3.670 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.007±0.002 | 0.006±0.002 | 0.001±0.00 | 0.005±0.001 | 0.004±0.001 | 0.001±0.000 | 0.066±0.018 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.010±0.002 | 0.003±0.000 | 0.007±0.001 | 0.003±0.000 | 0.004±0.001 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.048±0.008 | |
平均重复性R | 0.683 | 0.861 | 0.305 | 0.849 | 0.736 | 0.968 | 0.806 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 7.37 | 6.59 | 7.06 | 9.40 | 15.59 | 20.60 | 6.94 | |
头状胡枝子 L. capitata | 平均值Average | 2.408 | 1.747 | 1.382 | 1.024 | 0.568 | 0.294 | 6.600 |
最大值Max | 2.865 | 2.032 | 1.833 | 1.233 | 1.090 | 0.381 | 7.410 | |
最小值Min | 1.806 | 1.482 | 1.133 | 0.870 | 0.333 | 0.161 | 5.690 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.125 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.014±0.004 | 0.006±0.002 | 0.001±0.001 | 0.002±0.001 | 0.003±0.001 | 0.002±0.000 | 0.096±0.021 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.014±0.002 | 0.006±0.001 | 0.011±0.001 | 0.002±0.000 | 0.007±0.001 | 0.001±0.000 | 0.034±0.001 | |
平均重复性R | 0.751 | 0.757 | 0.224 | 0.806 | 0.536 | 0.985 | 0.894 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 6.95 | 6.34 | 7.72 | 6.19 | 16.94 | 15.34 | 5.42 | |
二色胡枝子 L. bicolor | 平均值Average | 3.156 | 2.469 | 1.277 | 1.562 | 0.697 | 0.558 | 8.950 |
最大值Max | 3.965 | 2.992 | 1.464 | 1.907 | 0.837 | 0.888 | 10.820 | |
最小值Min | 2.625 | 2.117 | 1.131 | 1.293 | 0.563 | 0.128 | 7.620 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.159 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.157±0.077 | 0.063±0.030 | 0.001±0.001 | 0.012±0.007 | 0.004±0.002 | 0.055±0.026 | 1.198±0.576 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.017±0.006 | 0.011±0.005 | 0.005±0.002 | 0.009±0.003 | 0.001±0.000 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.075±0.025 | |
平均重复性R | 0.965 | 0.944 | 0.384 | 0.797 | 0.920 | 0.999 | 0.980 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 12.77 | 10.60 | 6.02 | 9.04 | 9.64 | 40.63 | 12.16 |
Table 2 Estimated genotype, experimental error variance component and related standard error evaluation of Lespedeza germplasm
项目 Item | 性状 Traits | 种长 SL (mm) | 种宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
132份胡枝子种质 132 Lespedeza germplasm | 平均值Average | 2.216 | 1.696 | 1.305 | 1.050 | 0.589 | 0.281 | 5.153 |
最大值Max | 3.965 | 2.992 | 1.833 | 1.907 | 1.090 | 1.112 | 5.751 | |
最小值Min | 1.468 | 1.168 | 1.174 | 0.737 | 0.333 | 0.101 | 3.901 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.249±0.031 | 0.121±0.015 | 0.007±0.001 | 0.045±0.006 | 0.005±0.001 | 0.030±0.004 | 1.943±0.242 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.013±0.001 | 0.006±0.001 | 0.008±0.001 | 0.003±0.000 | 0.005±0.000 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.056±0.005 | |
平均重复性R | 0.983 | 0.984 | 0.677 | 0.979 | 0.783 | 0.997 | 0.990 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 23.02 | 20.96 | 8.99 | 20.85 | 17.01 | 61.53 | 22.94 | |
芥菜胡枝子 L. juncea | 平均值Average | 1.857 | 1.456 | 1.277 | 0.882 | 0.582 | 0.261 | 5.150 |
最大值Max | 2.187 | 1.566 | 1.550 | 1.090 | 0.717 | 0.601 | 5.750 | |
最小值Min | 1.637 | 1.270 | 1.113 | 0.760 | 0.397 | 0.133 | 3.900 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.001 | 0.048 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.000 | 0.008 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.021±0.014 | 0.003±0.003 | 0.008±0.006 | 0.009±0.006 | 0.004±0.003 | 0.029±0.017 | 0.100±0.043 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.008±0.003 | 0.005±0.002 | 0.007±0.003 | 0.002±0.001 | 0.003±0.001 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.096±0.036 | |
平均重复性R | 0.893 | 0.620 | 0.795 | 0.942 | 0.812 | 0.999 | 0.758 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 9.02 | 5.89 | 9.16 | 11.49 | 14.24 | 61.95 | 8.13 | |
截叶铁扫帚 L. cuneata | 平均值Average | 1.747 | 1.414 | 1.238 | 0.930 | 0.562 | 0.163 | 4.880 |
最大值Max | 2.131 | 1.806 | 1.559 | 1.223 | 0.863 | 0.302 | 6.120 | |
最小值Min | 1.468 | 1.168 | 1.010 | 0.737 | 0.393 | 0.101 | 3.670 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.007±0.002 | 0.006±0.002 | 0.001±0.00 | 0.005±0.001 | 0.004±0.001 | 0.001±0.000 | 0.066±0.018 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.010±0.002 | 0.003±0.000 | 0.007±0.001 | 0.003±0.000 | 0.004±0.001 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.048±0.008 | |
平均重复性R | 0.683 | 0.861 | 0.305 | 0.849 | 0.736 | 0.968 | 0.806 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 7.37 | 6.59 | 7.06 | 9.40 | 15.59 | 20.60 | 6.94 | |
头状胡枝子 L. capitata | 平均值Average | 2.408 | 1.747 | 1.382 | 1.024 | 0.568 | 0.294 | 6.600 |
最大值Max | 2.865 | 2.032 | 1.833 | 1.233 | 1.090 | 0.381 | 7.410 | |
最小值Min | 1.806 | 1.482 | 1.133 | 0.870 | 0.333 | 0.161 | 5.690 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.125 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.014±0.004 | 0.006±0.002 | 0.001±0.001 | 0.002±0.001 | 0.003±0.001 | 0.002±0.000 | 0.096±0.021 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.014±0.002 | 0.006±0.001 | 0.011±0.001 | 0.002±0.000 | 0.007±0.001 | 0.001±0.000 | 0.034±0.001 | |
平均重复性R | 0.751 | 0.757 | 0.224 | 0.806 | 0.536 | 0.985 | 0.894 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 6.95 | 6.34 | 7.72 | 6.19 | 16.94 | 15.34 | 5.42 | |
二色胡枝子 L. bicolor | 平均值Average | 3.156 | 2.469 | 1.277 | 1.562 | 0.697 | 0.558 | 8.950 |
最大值Max | 3.965 | 2.992 | 1.464 | 1.907 | 0.837 | 0.888 | 10.820 | |
最小值Min | 2.625 | 2.117 | 1.131 | 1.293 | 0.563 | 0.128 | 7.620 | |
差异水平l.s.d.0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.159 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
估计基因型σg2 | 0.157±0.077 | 0.063±0.030 | 0.001±0.001 | 0.012±0.007 | 0.004±0.002 | 0.055±0.026 | 1.198±0.576 | |
实验误差σε2 | 0.017±0.006 | 0.011±0.005 | 0.005±0.002 | 0.009±0.003 | 0.001±0.000 | 0.000±0.000 | 0.075±0.025 | |
平均重复性R | 0.965 | 0.944 | 0.384 | 0.797 | 0.920 | 0.999 | 0.980 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 12.77 | 10.60 | 6.02 | 9.04 | 9.64 | 40.63 | 12.16 |
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 63 | 1.78 | 1.43 | 1.25 | 0.93 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 4.97 |
2 | 52 | 2.41 | 1.75 | 1.38 | 1.03 | 0.57 | 0.29 | 6.62 |
3 | 17 | 3.15 | 2.44 | 1.29 | 1.54 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 8.86 |
Table 3 Cluster analysis grouping information of 132 Lespedeza accessions
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 63 | 1.78 | 1.43 | 1.25 | 0.93 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 4.97 |
2 | 52 | 2.41 | 1.75 | 1.38 | 1.03 | 0.57 | 0.29 | 6.62 |
3 | 17 | 3.15 | 2.44 | 1.29 | 1.54 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 8.86 |
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽SW | 0.950** | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.301** | -0.007 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.822** | 0.896** | -0.114 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.199* | 0.586** | -0.002 | 0.545** | ||
百粒重SY | 0.722** | 0.974** | 0.058 | 0.728** | 0.455** | |
种子周长Pe | 0.991** | 0.732** | 0.551** | 0.849** | 0.558** | 0.728** |
Table 4 Phenotypic (rp) correlation coefficients among traits based on the 132 Lespedeza accessions
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽SW | 0.950** | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.301** | -0.007 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.822** | 0.896** | -0.114 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.199* | 0.586** | -0.002 | 0.545** | ||
百粒重SY | 0.722** | 0.974** | 0.058 | 0.728** | 0.455** | |
种子周长Pe | 0.991** | 0.732** | 0.551** | 0.849** | 0.558** | 0.728** |
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 1.96 | 1.49 | 1.32 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.34 | 5.40 |
2 | 4 | 1.71 | 1.41 | 1.22 | 0.88 | 0.57 | 0.16 | 4.82 |
Table 5 Cluster analysis grouping information of L. juncea
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 1.96 | 1.49 | 1.32 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.34 | 5.40 |
2 | 4 | 1.71 | 1.41 | 1.22 | 0.88 | 0.57 | 0.16 | 4.82 |
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽SW | 0.840* | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | -0.345 | -0.725 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.320 | -0.243 | 0.663 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.216 | -0.191 | 0.592 | 0.732* | ||
百粒重SY | 0.139 | 0.082 | -0.025 | 0.397 | 0.258 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.871* | 0.737* | -0.423 | 0.259 | 0.292 | 0.186 |
Table 6 Phenotypic (rp) correlation coefficients among traits based on the 7 L. juncea accessions
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽SW | 0.840* | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | -0.345 | -0.725 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.320 | -0.243 | 0.663 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.216 | -0.191 | 0.592 | 0.732* | ||
百粒重SY | 0.139 | 0.082 | -0.025 | 0.397 | 0.258 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.871* | 0.737* | -0.423 | 0.259 | 0.292 | 0.186 |
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 23 | 1.68 | 1.37 | 1.23 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 4.68 |
2 | 19 | 1.84 | 1.47 | 1.25 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.16 | 5.12 |
Table 7 Cluster analysis grouping information of L. cuneata
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 23 | 1.68 | 1.37 | 1.23 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 4.68 |
2 | 19 | 1.84 | 1.47 | 1.25 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.16 | 5.12 |
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽 SW | 0.393* | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.054 | -0.394* | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.276 | -0.403** | 0.372 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.010 | -0.009 | 0.893** | 0.002 | ||
百粒重SY | 0.434** | -0.091 | 0.254 | 0.839** | -0.068 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.682** | 0.063 | 0.146 | 0.512** | 0.018 | 0.386* |
Table 8 Phenotypic (rp) correlation coefficients among traits based on the 42 L. cuneata accessions
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽 SW | 0.393* | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.054 | -0.394* | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.276 | -0.403** | 0.372 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.010 | -0.009 | 0.893** | 0.002 | ||
百粒重SY | 0.434** | -0.091 | 0.254 | 0.839** | -0.068 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.682** | 0.063 | 0.146 | 0.512** | 0.018 | 0.386* |
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 28 | 2.31 | 1.69 | 1.37 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 6.36 |
2 | 23 | 2.48 | 1.80 | 1.34 | 1.27 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 6.94 |
Table 9 Cluster analysis grouping information of L. capitata
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 28 | 2.31 | 1.69 | 1.37 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 6.36 |
2 | 23 | 2.48 | 1.80 | 1.34 | 1.27 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 6.94 |
性状Traits | 种子长 SL | 种子宽 SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽 SW | 0.518** | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.560** | 0.115 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.172 | -0.373** | 0.500** | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.087 | 0.320** | -0.015 | -0.072 | ||
百粒重SY | 0.219 | 0.945** | 0.050 | -0.057 | 0.139 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.599** | 0.256 | 0.570** | 0.790** | 0.061 | 0.119 |
Table 10 Phenotypic (rp) correlation coefficients among traits based on the 51 L. capitata accessions
性状Traits | 种子长 SL | 种子宽 SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽 SW | 0.518** | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.560** | 0.115 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.172 | -0.373** | 0.500** | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.087 | 0.320** | -0.015 | -0.072 | ||
百粒重SY | 0.219 | 0.945** | 0.050 | -0.057 | 0.139 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.599** | 0.256 | 0.570** | 0.790** | 0.061 | 0.119 |
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | 2.87 | 2.28 | 1.26 | 1.50 | 0.70 | 0.45 | 8.15 |
2 | 6 | 3.59 | 2.75 | 1.31 | 1.65 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 10.16 |
Table 11 Cluster analysis grouping information of L. bicolor
组群 Group | 种质数 Number of species | 种子长 SL (mm) | 种子宽 SW (mm) | 长宽比 SL/SW | 种子厚度 ST (mm) | 种脐长度 HL (mm) | 百粒重 SY (g) | 种子周长 Pe (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | 2.87 | 2.28 | 1.26 | 1.50 | 0.70 | 0.45 | 8.15 |
2 | 6 | 3.59 | 2.75 | 1.31 | 1.65 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 10.16 |
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽 SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽 SW | 0.669* | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.595 | 0.352 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.955** | 0.418 | 0.590 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.551 | -0.139 | 0.749* | 0.623 | ||
百粒重SY | 0.049 | -0.335 | -0.276 | 0.191 | 0.222 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.997** | 0.618 | 0.613 | 0.971** | 0.575 | 0.065 |
Table 12 Phenotypic (rp) correlation coefficients among traits based on the 10 L. bicolor accessions
性状Traits | 种子长SL | 种子宽 SW | 长宽比SL/SW | 种子厚度ST | 种脐长度HL | 百粒重SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子宽 SW | 0.669* | |||||
长宽比SL/SW | 0.595 | 0.352 | ||||
种子厚度ST | 0.955** | 0.418 | 0.590 | |||
种脐长度HL | 0.551 | -0.139 | 0.749* | 0.623 | ||
百粒重SY | 0.049 | -0.335 | -0.276 | 0.191 | 0.222 | |
种子周长Pe | 0.997** | 0.618 | 0.613 | 0.971** | 0.575 | 0.065 |
1 | Zhang Y, Yang Z, Li H, et al. Research progress on genetic diversity and application of Lespedeza plants. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2015, 36(2): 55-56. |
张杨, 杨曌, 李红, 等. 胡枝子属植物遗传多样性与应用研究进展. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2015, 36(2): 55-56. | |
2 | Chinese Flora Editing Committee. Flora of China (Volume 41). Beijing: China Science Press, 1999: 131-159. |
中国植物志编写委员会. 中国植物志(四十一卷). 北京: 中国科学出版社, 1999: 131-159. | |
3 | Guan X K, Zhang X H, Turner N C, et al. Two perennial legumes (Astragalus adsurgens Pall.and Lespedeza davurica S.) adapted to semiarid environments are not as productive as lucerne (Medicago sativa L.), but use less water. Grass and Forage Science, 2013, 68(3): 469-478. |
4 | Cheng J, Cheng J M, Hu T M. Distribution responses of Lespedezadavurica community on Loess Plateau to climate change. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(1): 35-40. |
程杰, 程积民, 呼天明. 气候变化对黄土高原达乌里胡枝子种群分布格局的影响. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1): 35-40. | |
5 | Hou Y, Guo Y J, Zhang J W, et al. Study of the adaptability and planting on several main legumes in Songnen grassland. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(4): 56-62 |
侯宇, 郭荫杰, 张金伟, 等. 松嫩草地主要豆科牧草的适应性与种植利用研究. 生态科学, 2019, 38(4): 56-62. | |
6 | He Y S. Seasonal dynamics of condensed tannin content and structure of Lespedeza bicolor and their effects on the in vitro rumen fermentation. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
何永生. 胡枝子缩合单宁含量与结构的季节动态变化及其对体外瘤胃发酵的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
7 | Li Y Y, Tu M L, Wang W, et al. Study on the correlation between chlorophyll content and protein content of main forage grass under different terrains conditions in typical grassland. Grassland and Prataculture, 2020, 32(1): 41-46. |
李宇宇, 涂明亮, 王伟, 等. 典型草原不同地势主要牧草叶绿素含量与蛋白质含量的相关性研究. 草原与草业, 2020, 32(1): 41-46. | |
8 | Wang W, Yan X Y, Wang Y Q, et al. Advances in studies on chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Lespedeza. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2000, 31(2): 144-146. |
王威, 闫喜英, 王永奇, 等. 胡枝子属植物化学成分及药理活性研究进展. 中草药, 2000, 31(2): 144-146. | |
9 | Chen M J, Li C L, Qi Y. Studies on biological features of Lespedeza and its nutrient values. Resources Science, 1997, 19(2): 74-81. |
陈默君, 李昌林, 祁永. 胡枝子生物学特性和营养价值研究. 自然资源, 1997, 19(2): 74-81. | |
10 | Li R Z, Chen C, Zhang P P, et al. Advances in research on genetic resources and breeding and genetics of oat (Avena sativa L.). Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009, 37(17): 44-45. |
李润枝, 陈晨, 张培培, 等. 我国燕麦种质资源与遗传育种研究进展. 现代农业科技, 2009, 37(17): 44-45. | |
11 | Beuselinck P R, Steiner J J. A proposed framework for identifying, quantifying, and utilizing plant germplasm resources. Field Crops Research, 1992, 29(3): 261-272. |
12 | Li W Y, Gu W C. Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Quercus Mongolic. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(1): 49-56. |
李文英, 顾万春. 蒙古栎天然群体表型多样性研究. 林业科学, 2005, 41(1): 49-56. | |
13 | Zhang Y J, Gou Z W, Wang X R, et al. An analysis of genetic diversity and linked agronomic traits of Heshangtou wheat in Northwest China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 142-155. |
张彦军, 苟作旺, 王兴荣, 等. 西北地区和尚头小麦遗传多样性及农艺性状的关联分析. 草业学报, 2019, 28(2): 142-155. | |
14 | Jia J X, Jia D X, Ren Q M. Chinese crops and wild relatives. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006: 19-26. |
贾敬贤, 贾定贤, 任庆棉. 中国作物及野生近缘植物. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 19-26. | |
15 | Li Y, Chong P F, Gao Q. Correlation analysis of phenotypic traits of Reaumuria soongorica seed in different natural populations in the Gansu Corridor. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 87-94. |
李毅, 种培芳, 高茜. 河西走廊不同红砂天然群体种子表型性状相关性研究. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 87-94. | |
16 | Dong R, Jahufer M Z Z, Dong D K, et al. Characterisation of the morphological variation for seed traits among 537 germplasm accessions of common vetch using digital image analysis. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2016, 59(4): 422-435. |
17 | Harada K, Huan V N, Sugimoto H. Quantitative variation in growth and yield-related traits and seed morphology in local varieties of soybean in the western part of the Shikoku Mountains. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 2007, 76(1): 86-92. |
18 | Rumbaugh M D, Graves W L, Caddel J L, et al. Variability in a collection of alfalfa germplasm from Morocco. Crop Science, 1988, 28(4): 605-609. |
19 | Williams K, Munkvold J, Sorrells M. Comparison of digital image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors and major dimensions to phenotype seed shape in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica, 2013, 190(1): 99-116. |
20 | Grillo O, Mattana E, Venora G, et al. Statistical seed classifiers of 10 plant families representative of the Mediterranean vascular flora. Seed Science & Technology, 2010, 38(2): 455-476. |
21 | Fuller D Q. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: Recent archaeobotanical insights from the old world. Annals of Botany, 2007, 100(5): 903-924. |
22 | Liu S X, Song X H. Effect of seed size on the character essentials and yield in spring wheat. Seed, 2003, 22(1): 26-27. |
刘生祥, 宋晓华. 春小麦种子大小对主要性状及产量的影响. 种子, 2003 , 22(1): 26-27. | |
23 | Sahai K. Macro- and micromorphology of seed surface of exotic pine species adapted in Indian Himalayan climate. Phytomorphology, 1994, 44(2): 31-35. |
24 | Barthlott W. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: Systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany, 1981, 1(3): 345-355. |
25 | Ocampo G, Michelangeli F A, Almeda F. Seed diversity in the tribe Miconieae (Melastomataceae): Taxonomic, systematic, and evolutionary implications. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): e100561. |
26 | Apuan D A, Torres M A J, Demayo G G, et al. Quantitative evaluation of weedy rice seed shape based on elliptic fourier descriptor. Kunming: 2010 3rd International Conference on Environmental & Computer Science, 2010. |
27 | Tong Y W, Tang Y, Chen H, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Pinus koraiensis populations in a seed orchard. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6341-6348. |
童跃伟, 唐杨, 陈红, 等. 红松种子园种群表型多样性研究. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6341-6348. | |
28 | Kroonenberg P M. The TUCKALS line: A suite of programs for three-way data analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 1994, 18(1): 73-96. |
29 | White. Predicting breeding values with applications in forest tree improvement. Berlin: Springer Netherlands, 1989. |
30 | Fehr W R. Principles of cultivar development, vol1. New York: Macmillan publishing company, 1987. |
31 | Wu Y H, Fan Z L, Li J, et al. Phenotypic diversity of seeds and fruits in natural populations of Acer ginnala in China. Guihaia, 2018, 38(6): 795-803. |
武艳虹, 樊泽璐, 李佳, 等. 茶条槭自然种群种子和果实表型多样性研究. 广西植物, 2018, 38(6): 795-803. | |
32 | Zhang J Y. Study on genetic diversity of 14 wildes Lespedeza populations. Lanzhou: Gansu Agriculture University, 2003. |
张吉宇. 胡枝子属14个野生居群遗传多样性研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2003. | |
33 | Bécquer E R, Michelangeli F A, Borsch T. Comparative seed morphology of the Antillean genus Calycogonium (Melastomataceae: Miconieae) as a source of characters to untangle its complex taxonomy. Phytotaxa, 2014, 166: 241-258. |
34 | Feng Q H, Shi Z M, Xu Z J R, et al. The study on phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Cupressuschengiana populations in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(3): 748-756. |
冯秋红, 史作民, 徐峥静茹, 等. 岷江柏天然种群种实表型变异特征. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 748-756. | |
35 | Zhang D, Li J, Compton R O, et al. Comparative genetics of seed size traits in divergent cereal lineages represented by sorghum (Panicoidae) and rice (Oryzoidae). G3-Genes Genomes Genetics, 2015, 5(6): 1117-1128. |
36 | Hou W H, Wang J L, Dan B, et al. Phenotypic correlation analysis of hullessbarley kernel traits form tibet plateau region under the condition of different ecological environment. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(10): 2063-2071. |
侯维海, 王建林, 旦巴, 等. 不同生态因子条件下西藏青稞种子表型性状的相关分析. 核农学报, 2017, 31(10): 2063-2071. | |
37 | Gegas V C, Nazari A, Griffiths S, et al. A genetic framework for grain size and shape variation in wheat. The Plant Cell, 2010, 22(4): 1046-1056. |
38 | Yang S H, Liu R, Yang T, et al. Accurate evaluation on seed phenotypic traits of faba bean germplasm resources. China Vegetables, 2016(10): 32-40. |
杨生华, 刘荣, 杨涛, 等. 蚕豆种质资源种子表型性状精准评价. 中国蔬菜, 2016(10): 32-40. | |
39 | Dong R. Genetic diversity and pod shattering biological characteristics study of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2017. |
董瑞. 箭筈豌豆遗传多样性及裂荚生物学特性研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017. |
[1] | Xin-tong ZHAO, Xiao-dong CHEN, Zi-ji LI, Ju-ming ZHANG, Tian-zeng LIU. An evaluation of the effects of the plant endophyte Enterobacter on the salt tolerance of bermudagrass [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 127-136. |
[2] | Chuan-qi WANG, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Qing-ping ZHOU. Drought tolerance of wild Elymus nutans during germination and seedling establishment [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 76-85. |
[3] | Chuan-qi WANG, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Qing-ping ZHOU. Studies on drought tolerance of wild Elymus sibiricus at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 127-136. |
[4] | Jia-min CAO, Ya-ya GUO, Na-na LI, Hai-rong SUN, Zhao-bi CHE, Wei-hua LU. Diversity characteristics of dung beetle of Seirphidium semidesert and its secondary distribution of seeds in the feces [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 137-145. |
[5] | Wen-gang XIE, Yi-yang WAN, Zong-yu ZHANG, Jun-chao ZHANG. Research progress on the seed-shattering mechanism of Poaceae plants [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 186-198. |
[6] | Yu-xia WANG, Jin-long CHAI, Yang-yang ZHOU, Chang-lin XU, Lin WANG, Xiao-jun YU. Effects of planting method on seed yield and its components in Medicago ruthenica in an arid area of Longzhong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 60-72. |
[7] | Fu-zhi LIU, Ying-fang ZHANG, Yuan CHEN. Effects of exogenous trehalose on growth regulation and total flavonoid content of Glycyrrhiza uralensis seedlings under NaHCO3 stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 148-156. |
[8] | Chun-jie LI, Ming-xiao LANG, Zhen-jiang CHEN, Zheng-feng WANG, Tai-xiang CHEN. Advances in artificial inoculation technology for grass-endophytic fungi [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 179-189. |
[9] | Xiu-mei NIE, Ping MU, Gui-qin ZHAO, Hai-peng HE, Wen-bin WU, Dou-dou LIN, Wei-juan SU, Li-rui ZHANG. Effects of storage time on fungal and mycotoxin contamination of naked oat seeds [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 106-120. |
[10] | Hui JI, Jiu-qiang GUAN, Hui WANG, Jian-xu ZHOU, Nong-ga A, Zong-wei HE, Zhen-xiang FAN, Long-kang QIU, Shi-xiao CAO, Tian-wu AN, Qin BAI, Jin-cheng ZHONG, Xiao-lin LUO. Genetic structure and diversity of Yading yak and Larima yak populations [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 134-145. |
[11] | Sai Hen-na BAO, Xiang-tao WANG, Jun-xi WU, Yan-jun MIAO, Xiang JIA, Yan-ting TIAN. Allelopathic effect of root extracts from Astragalus strictus seedlings on eight wild plants of Tibet [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 211-220. |
[12] | An-qiao LU, Feng-ju ZHANG, Xing XU, Xue-qin WANG, Shan YAO. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Echinochloa frumentacea seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 84-93. |
[13] | Rui WU, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Yan QIN, Xiao-xing WEI, Min-jie LIU. A study of the correlation between seed shattering and agronomic traits of Elymus sibiricus on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 130-139. |
[14] | Long WANG, Jie FAN, Chang WEI, Ge-zi LI, Jing-jing ZHANG, Qiu-juan JIAO, Guo CHEN, Luan-zi SUN, Hai-tao LIU. Mitigative effect of exogenous ascorbic acid on the growth of copper-stressed chicory (Cichorium intybus) seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 150-159. |
[15] | Jin-wei HOU, Tao CHEN, Zhi-biao NAN. Effects of fungicide and sowing treatments on seed survival of three plant species on the Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 129-136. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||