Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 215-227.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024119
Xing-fa GAO1(), Ying-ying NIE2, Li-jun XU2(), Min YANG2,3(), Shu-hua XU1, Meng ZHU1
Received:
2024-04-10
Revised:
2024-05-08
Online:
2024-11-20
Published:
2024-09-09
Contact:
Li-jun XU,Min YANG
Xing-fa GAO, Ying-ying NIE, Li-jun XU, Min YANG, Shu-hua XU, Meng ZHU. Adaptability evaluation of oat introduction in winter fallow field of Wumeng Mountain area under drought condition[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(11): 215-227.
编号No. | 品种 Varieties | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|
N1 | 香燕18号A.nuda var. Xiangyan No.18 | 中国农业科学院草原研究所 Institute of Grassland Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
N2 | 定莜5号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.5 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N3 | 定莜7号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.7 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N4 | 定莜10号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.10 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N5 | 定莜4号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.4 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N6 | 定莜3号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.3 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N7 | 定莜2号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.2 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N8 | 香燕13号A.nuda var. Xiangyan No.13 | 中国农业科学院草原研究所 Institute of Grassland Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
N9 | 定莜8号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.8 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N10 | 定莜1号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.1 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N11 | 青引3号A.nuda var. Qingyin No.3 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N12 | 青莜3号A.nuda var. Qingyou No.3 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N13 | 定莜13号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.13 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N14 | 定莜11号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.11 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N15 | 中农科会1号A.nuda var. Zhongnongkehui No.1 | 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
N16 | 坝莜14号A.nuda var. Bayou No.14 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N17 | 本地燕麦A.nuda var. Local oat | 大桥乡Daqiao Township |
Table 1 Oat varieties and sources tested
编号No. | 品种 Varieties | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|
N1 | 香燕18号A.nuda var. Xiangyan No.18 | 中国农业科学院草原研究所 Institute of Grassland Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
N2 | 定莜5号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.5 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N3 | 定莜7号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.7 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N4 | 定莜10号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.10 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N5 | 定莜4号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.4 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N6 | 定莜3号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.3 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N7 | 定莜2号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.2 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N8 | 香燕13号A.nuda var. Xiangyan No.13 | 中国农业科学院草原研究所 Institute of Grassland Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
N9 | 定莜8号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.8 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N10 | 定莜1号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.1 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N11 | 青引3号A.nuda var. Qingyin No.3 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N12 | 青莜3号A.nuda var. Qingyou No.3 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N13 | 定莜13号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.13 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N14 | 定莜11号A.nuda var. Dingyou No.11 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N15 | 中农科会1号A.nuda var. Zhongnongkehui No.1 | 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
N16 | 坝莜14号A.nuda var. Bayou No.14 | 甘肃创绿草业科技有限公司Gansu Chuanglyu Grass Industry Co.LTD |
N17 | 本地燕麦A.nuda var. Local oat | 大桥乡Daqiao Township |
品种 Varieties | 籽粒产量Grain yield | 干草产量Hay yield |
---|---|---|
香燕18号Xiangyan No.18 | 3722±230a | 11172±724a |
定莜5号Dingyou No.5 | 2350±260bcd | 10029±802a |
定莜7号Dingyou No.7 | 2623±280abc | 10198±1110a |
定莜10号Dingyou No.10 | 2629±255abc | 8850±734ab |
定莜4号Dingyou No.4 | 2203±159bcd | 9041±584ab |
定莜3号Dingyou No.3 | 3169±526abc | 8533±1247ab |
定莜2号Dingyou No.2 | 2174±159bcd | 9032±1516ab |
香燕13号Xiangyan No.13 | 3582±581a | 9176±1368ab |
定莜8号Dingyou No.8 | 2143±233d | 8824±1235ab |
定莜1号Dingyou No.1 | 2816±325bcd | 9819±1158a |
青引3号Qingyin No.3 | 1298±193d | 5784±439bc |
青莜3号Qingyou No.3 | 3107±513abc | 8870±1760ab |
定莜13号Dingyou No.13 | 3743±244a | 9561±548a |
定莜11号Dingyou No.11 | 3120±248abc | 8936±799ab |
中农科会1号Zhongnongkehui No.1 | 2055±149cd | 4689±562c |
坝莜14号Bayou No.14 | 3209±347ab | 9624±953a |
本地燕麦Local oat | 2256±296bcd | 8547±1464ab |
Table 2 Comparison of grain yield and hay yield of different oat varieties (kg·hm-2)
品种 Varieties | 籽粒产量Grain yield | 干草产量Hay yield |
---|---|---|
香燕18号Xiangyan No.18 | 3722±230a | 11172±724a |
定莜5号Dingyou No.5 | 2350±260bcd | 10029±802a |
定莜7号Dingyou No.7 | 2623±280abc | 10198±1110a |
定莜10号Dingyou No.10 | 2629±255abc | 8850±734ab |
定莜4号Dingyou No.4 | 2203±159bcd | 9041±584ab |
定莜3号Dingyou No.3 | 3169±526abc | 8533±1247ab |
定莜2号Dingyou No.2 | 2174±159bcd | 9032±1516ab |
香燕13号Xiangyan No.13 | 3582±581a | 9176±1368ab |
定莜8号Dingyou No.8 | 2143±233d | 8824±1235ab |
定莜1号Dingyou No.1 | 2816±325bcd | 9819±1158a |
青引3号Qingyin No.3 | 1298±193d | 5784±439bc |
青莜3号Qingyou No.3 | 3107±513abc | 8870±1760ab |
定莜13号Dingyou No.13 | 3743±244a | 9561±548a |
定莜11号Dingyou No.11 | 3120±248abc | 8936±799ab |
中农科会1号Zhongnongkehui No.1 | 2055±149cd | 4689±562c |
坝莜14号Bayou No.14 | 3209±347ab | 9624±953a |
本地燕麦Local oat | 2256±296bcd | 8547±1464ab |
编号 No. | 千粒重 | 穗粒数 Grains per spike (No.) | 穗长 Spike length (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thick (cm) | 轮层数 Number of wheel layers (No.) | 铃铛数 Number of bells (No.) | 有效分蘖数 Effective tiller number (No.) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 生育期 Growth period (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 23.83±1.40ab | 481.3±48.3bcd | 21.1±1.2ab | 3.19±0.31ab | 5.4±0.2ab | 28.9±2.3a | 1.7±0.7cd | 111.2±6.2a | 216±4abc |
N2 | 21.15±1.70bcd | 515.3±117.0abcd | 20.3±1.0abc | 3.20±0.23ab | 5.2±0.1abc | 21.6±3.1cd | 1.7±0.1cd | 104.4±4.6ab | 210±1cde |
N3 | 24.06±5.47ab | 570.8±43.0abc | 22.4±1.3a | 3.35±0.39a | 5.1±0.2abc | 25.1±3.0abcd | 2.1±0.5bcd | 108.7±12.1ab | 209±2cde |
N4 | 23.96±2.18ab | 435.5±30.8bcd | 19.7±0.3bc | 3.30±0.26ab | 5.4±0.3a | 24.0±1.6abcd | 1.3±0.4d | 103.6±7.5ab | 221±4a |
N5 | 22.96±0.55ab | 400.3±14.3cd | 20.1±0.5abc | 3.20±0.19ab | 4.8±0.3bc | 19.7±2.7d | 1.8±0.9cd | 105.6±2.7ab | 207±4de |
N6 | 22.39±2.47ab | 472.3±111.9bcd | 19.6±1.4bc | 3.05±0.21ab | 4.9±0.2abc | 20.5±2.0d | 1.7±0.1cd | 95.8±8.0abc | 207±2de |
N7 | 21.76±0.50abc | 411.5±49.8cd | 19.4±0.5bc | 3.12±0.23ab | 4.7±0.3c | 18.5±4.1d | 2.0±0.5bcd | 99.7±8.8abc | 211±2bcde |
N8 | 23.87±0.91ab | 544.8±70.7abcd | 17.9±1.0cde | 3.21±0.18ab | 5.3±0.2abc | 25.4±3.2abcd | 1.4±0.3cd | 105.8±7.3ab | 219±2ab |
N9 | 22.52±1.27ab | 391.5±103.6d | 21.2±1.7cde | 3.07±0.17ab | 4.9±0.2abc | 18.5±3.6d | 1.4±0.2d | 102.5±8.3abc | 216±3abcd |
N10 | 23.83±0.82ab | 447.3±89.2bcd | 18.3±2.1ab | 3.20±0.26ab | 4.9±0.1abc | 21.8±2.6bcd | 1.8±0.6cd | 108.0±7.7ab | 216±2abcd |
N11 | 18.35±0.19d | 388.3±138.9d | 15.8±2.0ef | 2.82±0.09bc | 3.9±0.6d | 19.2±3.5d | 1.9±0.6cd | 76.1±6.2g | 205±14e |
N12 | 19.16±0.64cd | 555.8±182.5abcd | 15.9±1.8ef | 3.29±0.34ab | 5.1±0.7abc | 28.6±3.8ab | 2.4±0.5abc | 65.9±7.8g | 212±3abcde |
N13 | 24.66±0.52a | 608.0±105.9ab | 19.1±1.8bcd | 3.49±0.47a | 5.5±0.3a | 30.3±6.3a | 1.8±0.7cd | 104.9±9.1ab | 222±2a |
N14 | 19.14±2.13cd | 671.0±129.6a | 21.5±2.9ab | 3.23±0.25ab | 5.4±0.4a | 27.7±9.5abc | 1.7±0.9cd | 101.0±14.6abc | 221±2a |
N15 | 24.52±0.65a | 454.3±159.8bcd | 13.6±2.5f | 3.41±0.36a | 4.9±0.6abc | 21.2±6.9cd | 2.8±0.9ab | 83.4±5.1def | 193±5f |
N16 | 22.33±1.36ab | 551.8±83.0abcd | 19.5±1.6bc | 3.22±0.46ab | 5.5±0.6a | 29.3±4.4a | 1.8±0.6cd | 89.6±13.1cde | 213±16abcde |
N17 | 14.45±0.62e | 385.5±112.8d | 16.6±1.9de | 2.87±0.92c | 5.1±0.2abc | 20.5±2.9d | 3.0±0.5a | 79.3±1.2ef | 218±4abc |
平均值Average | 21.94 | 487.3 | 18.9 | 3.17 | 5.1 | 23.5 | 1.9 | 96.8 | 212 |
变异系数Coefficient of variation (CV, %) | 14.21 | 25.46 | 14.35 | 11.01 | 9.98 | 23.55 | 35.70 | 15.29 | 4.14 |
遗传多样性指数Genetic diversity index (GDI) | 1.884 | 1.951 | 1.985 | 2.041 | 1.957 | 1.990 | 2.005 | 1.976 | 1.903 |
Table 3 Analysis of agronomic traits of different oat varieties
编号 No. | 千粒重 | 穗粒数 Grains per spike (No.) | 穗长 Spike length (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thick (cm) | 轮层数 Number of wheel layers (No.) | 铃铛数 Number of bells (No.) | 有效分蘖数 Effective tiller number (No.) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 生育期 Growth period (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 23.83±1.40ab | 481.3±48.3bcd | 21.1±1.2ab | 3.19±0.31ab | 5.4±0.2ab | 28.9±2.3a | 1.7±0.7cd | 111.2±6.2a | 216±4abc |
N2 | 21.15±1.70bcd | 515.3±117.0abcd | 20.3±1.0abc | 3.20±0.23ab | 5.2±0.1abc | 21.6±3.1cd | 1.7±0.1cd | 104.4±4.6ab | 210±1cde |
N3 | 24.06±5.47ab | 570.8±43.0abc | 22.4±1.3a | 3.35±0.39a | 5.1±0.2abc | 25.1±3.0abcd | 2.1±0.5bcd | 108.7±12.1ab | 209±2cde |
N4 | 23.96±2.18ab | 435.5±30.8bcd | 19.7±0.3bc | 3.30±0.26ab | 5.4±0.3a | 24.0±1.6abcd | 1.3±0.4d | 103.6±7.5ab | 221±4a |
N5 | 22.96±0.55ab | 400.3±14.3cd | 20.1±0.5abc | 3.20±0.19ab | 4.8±0.3bc | 19.7±2.7d | 1.8±0.9cd | 105.6±2.7ab | 207±4de |
N6 | 22.39±2.47ab | 472.3±111.9bcd | 19.6±1.4bc | 3.05±0.21ab | 4.9±0.2abc | 20.5±2.0d | 1.7±0.1cd | 95.8±8.0abc | 207±2de |
N7 | 21.76±0.50abc | 411.5±49.8cd | 19.4±0.5bc | 3.12±0.23ab | 4.7±0.3c | 18.5±4.1d | 2.0±0.5bcd | 99.7±8.8abc | 211±2bcde |
N8 | 23.87±0.91ab | 544.8±70.7abcd | 17.9±1.0cde | 3.21±0.18ab | 5.3±0.2abc | 25.4±3.2abcd | 1.4±0.3cd | 105.8±7.3ab | 219±2ab |
N9 | 22.52±1.27ab | 391.5±103.6d | 21.2±1.7cde | 3.07±0.17ab | 4.9±0.2abc | 18.5±3.6d | 1.4±0.2d | 102.5±8.3abc | 216±3abcd |
N10 | 23.83±0.82ab | 447.3±89.2bcd | 18.3±2.1ab | 3.20±0.26ab | 4.9±0.1abc | 21.8±2.6bcd | 1.8±0.6cd | 108.0±7.7ab | 216±2abcd |
N11 | 18.35±0.19d | 388.3±138.9d | 15.8±2.0ef | 2.82±0.09bc | 3.9±0.6d | 19.2±3.5d | 1.9±0.6cd | 76.1±6.2g | 205±14e |
N12 | 19.16±0.64cd | 555.8±182.5abcd | 15.9±1.8ef | 3.29±0.34ab | 5.1±0.7abc | 28.6±3.8ab | 2.4±0.5abc | 65.9±7.8g | 212±3abcde |
N13 | 24.66±0.52a | 608.0±105.9ab | 19.1±1.8bcd | 3.49±0.47a | 5.5±0.3a | 30.3±6.3a | 1.8±0.7cd | 104.9±9.1ab | 222±2a |
N14 | 19.14±2.13cd | 671.0±129.6a | 21.5±2.9ab | 3.23±0.25ab | 5.4±0.4a | 27.7±9.5abc | 1.7±0.9cd | 101.0±14.6abc | 221±2a |
N15 | 24.52±0.65a | 454.3±159.8bcd | 13.6±2.5f | 3.41±0.36a | 4.9±0.6abc | 21.2±6.9cd | 2.8±0.9ab | 83.4±5.1def | 193±5f |
N16 | 22.33±1.36ab | 551.8±83.0abcd | 19.5±1.6bc | 3.22±0.46ab | 5.5±0.6a | 29.3±4.4a | 1.8±0.6cd | 89.6±13.1cde | 213±16abcde |
N17 | 14.45±0.62e | 385.5±112.8d | 16.6±1.9de | 2.87±0.92c | 5.1±0.2abc | 20.5±2.9d | 3.0±0.5a | 79.3±1.2ef | 218±4abc |
平均值Average | 21.94 | 487.3 | 18.9 | 3.17 | 5.1 | 23.5 | 1.9 | 96.8 | 212 |
变异系数Coefficient of variation (CV, %) | 14.21 | 25.46 | 14.35 | 11.01 | 9.98 | 23.55 | 35.70 | 15.29 | 4.14 |
遗传多样性指数Genetic diversity index (GDI) | 1.884 | 1.951 | 1.985 | 2.041 | 1.957 | 1.990 | 2.005 | 1.976 | 1.903 |
编号No. | 关联度系数Correlation coefficient | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | F | CP | CG | CH | R | X | |
N1 | 0.995 | 0.470 | 0.992 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.991 | 0.992 | 1.000 | 0.877 | 0.992 | 0.917 | 0.997 | 1.000 | 0.964 | 1.000 | 0.962 | 1 |
N2 | 0.980 | 0.519 | 0.987 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.951 | 0.992 | 0.961 | 0.909 | 0.644 | 1.000 | 0.997 | 0.993 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.946 | 5 |
N3 | 0.996 | 0.627 | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.970 | 0.994 | 0.986 | 0.914 | 0.693 | 0.960 | 0.990 | 0.998 | 0.992 | 0.997 | 0.956 | 2 |
N4 | 0.996 | 0.417 | 0.984 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.964 | 0.990 | 0.957 | 0.857 | 0.694 | 0.634 | 0.976 | 0.995 | 0.985 | 0.997 | 0.923 | 11 |
N5 | 0.990 | 0.383 | 0.987 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.941 | 0.993 | 0.968 | 0.922 | 0.621 | 0.750 | 1.000 | 0.993 | 0.982 | 0.994 | 0.928 | 9 |
N6 | 0.987 | 0.458 | 0.984 | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.945 | 0.992 | 0.916 | 0.921 | 0.815 | 0.521 | 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.976 | 0.995 | 0.925 | 10 |
N7 | 0.983 | 0.393 | 0.982 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.934 | 0.994 | 0.936 | 0.905 | 0.617 | 0.755 | 0.983 | 0.987 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.922 | 12 |
N8 | 0.995 | 0.571 | 0.974 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.972 | 0.991 | 0.969 | 0.864 | 0.940 | 0.548 | 0.982 | 0.987 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.939 | 6 |
N9 | 0.987 | 0.376 | 0.976 | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.934 | 0.990 | 0.951 | 0.880 | 0.612 | 0.717 | 0.988 | 0.981 | 0.999 | 0.995 | 0.919 | 14 |
N10 | 0.995 | 0.429 | 0.993 | 0.998 | 0.996 | 0.952 | 0.993 | 0.981 | 0.879 | 0.731 | 0.788 | 0.980 | 0.984 | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.935 | 8 |
N11 | 0.964 | 0.373 | 0.962 | 0.996 | 0.991 | 0.938 | 0.993 | 0.828 | 0.933 | 0.508 | 0.441 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.982 | 0.995 | 0.891 | 17 |
N12 | 0.968 | 0.593 | 0.962 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.990 | 0.996 | 0.788 | 0.898 | 0.799 | 0.568 | 0.988 | 0.993 | 0.981 | 0.989 | 0.922 | 13 |
N13 | 1.000 | 0.727 | 0.981 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.993 | 0.964 | 0.854 | 1.000 | 0.575 | 0.984 | 0.991 | 0.994 | 0.993 | 0.952 | 3 |
N14 | 0.968 | 1.000 | 0.995 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.984 | 0.992 | 0.943 | 0.857 | 0.802 | 0.575 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.993 | 0.947 | 4 |
N15 | 0.999 | 0.437 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 0.996 | 0.949 | 0.999 | 0.858 | 1.000 | 0.599 | 0.333 | 0.984 | 0.992 | 1.000 | 0.994 | 0.905 | 15 |
N16 | 0.986 | 0.585 | 0.983 | 0.998 | 1.000 | 0.994 | 0.993 | 0.886 | 0.895 | 0.825 | 0.666 | 0.984 | 0.982 | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.937 | 7 |
N17 | 0.943 | 0.371 | 0.967 | 0.994 | 0.997 | 0.940 | 1.000 | 0.841 | 0.872 | 0.629 | 0.645 | 0.984 | 0.990 | 0.986 | 0.994 | 0.905 | 16 |
Table 4 Correlation coefficient between agronomic traits and nutrients of bare oats
编号No. | 关联度系数Correlation coefficient | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | F | CP | CG | CH | R | X | |
N1 | 0.995 | 0.470 | 0.992 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.991 | 0.992 | 1.000 | 0.877 | 0.992 | 0.917 | 0.997 | 1.000 | 0.964 | 1.000 | 0.962 | 1 |
N2 | 0.980 | 0.519 | 0.987 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.951 | 0.992 | 0.961 | 0.909 | 0.644 | 1.000 | 0.997 | 0.993 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.946 | 5 |
N3 | 0.996 | 0.627 | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.970 | 0.994 | 0.986 | 0.914 | 0.693 | 0.960 | 0.990 | 0.998 | 0.992 | 0.997 | 0.956 | 2 |
N4 | 0.996 | 0.417 | 0.984 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.964 | 0.990 | 0.957 | 0.857 | 0.694 | 0.634 | 0.976 | 0.995 | 0.985 | 0.997 | 0.923 | 11 |
N5 | 0.990 | 0.383 | 0.987 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.941 | 0.993 | 0.968 | 0.922 | 0.621 | 0.750 | 1.000 | 0.993 | 0.982 | 0.994 | 0.928 | 9 |
N6 | 0.987 | 0.458 | 0.984 | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.945 | 0.992 | 0.916 | 0.921 | 0.815 | 0.521 | 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.976 | 0.995 | 0.925 | 10 |
N7 | 0.983 | 0.393 | 0.982 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.934 | 0.994 | 0.936 | 0.905 | 0.617 | 0.755 | 0.983 | 0.987 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.922 | 12 |
N8 | 0.995 | 0.571 | 0.974 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.972 | 0.991 | 0.969 | 0.864 | 0.940 | 0.548 | 0.982 | 0.987 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.939 | 6 |
N9 | 0.987 | 0.376 | 0.976 | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.934 | 0.990 | 0.951 | 0.880 | 0.612 | 0.717 | 0.988 | 0.981 | 0.999 | 0.995 | 0.919 | 14 |
N10 | 0.995 | 0.429 | 0.993 | 0.998 | 0.996 | 0.952 | 0.993 | 0.981 | 0.879 | 0.731 | 0.788 | 0.980 | 0.984 | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.935 | 8 |
N11 | 0.964 | 0.373 | 0.962 | 0.996 | 0.991 | 0.938 | 0.993 | 0.828 | 0.933 | 0.508 | 0.441 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.982 | 0.995 | 0.891 | 17 |
N12 | 0.968 | 0.593 | 0.962 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.990 | 0.996 | 0.788 | 0.898 | 0.799 | 0.568 | 0.988 | 0.993 | 0.981 | 0.989 | 0.922 | 13 |
N13 | 1.000 | 0.727 | 0.981 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.993 | 0.964 | 0.854 | 1.000 | 0.575 | 0.984 | 0.991 | 0.994 | 0.993 | 0.952 | 3 |
N14 | 0.968 | 1.000 | 0.995 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.984 | 0.992 | 0.943 | 0.857 | 0.802 | 0.575 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.993 | 0.947 | 4 |
N15 | 0.999 | 0.437 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 0.996 | 0.949 | 0.999 | 0.858 | 1.000 | 0.599 | 0.333 | 0.984 | 0.992 | 1.000 | 0.994 | 0.905 | 15 |
N16 | 0.986 | 0.585 | 0.983 | 0.998 | 1.000 | 0.994 | 0.993 | 0.886 | 0.895 | 0.825 | 0.666 | 0.984 | 0.982 | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.937 | 7 |
N17 | 0.943 | 0.371 | 0.967 | 0.994 | 0.997 | 0.940 | 1.000 | 0.841 | 0.872 | 0.629 | 0.645 | 0.984 | 0.990 | 0.986 | 0.994 | 0.905 | 16 |
1 | Wang Q, Li Z J, Li J, et al. Evaluation of agronomic and forage quality traits of a range of oat cultivars. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 149-158. |
王茜, 李志坚, 李晶, 等. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 149-158. | |
2 | Zheng D S, Zhang Z W. Introduction and utilization of foreign oat germplasm resources in China. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(6): 1001-1005. |
郑殿升, 张宗文. 中国燕麦种质资源国外引种与利用. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6): 1001-1005. | |
3 | Zhou P P, Yan H H, Peng Y Y. Hexaploid ancestor of cultivated hexaploid oats inferred from high throughput GBS-SNP markers. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(10): 1604-1612. |
周萍萍, 颜红海, 彭远英. 基于高通量GBS-SNP标记的栽培燕麦六倍体起源研究. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1604-1612. | |
4 | Time Magazine selected ten healthy foods. China Agricultural Accounting, 2003(8): 22. |
美国《时代杂志》选出十大健康食品. 中国农业会计, 2003(8): 22. | |
5 | Diana M L, Luud J W J G, Richard G F V, et al. Understanding the role of oat β-glucan in oat-based dough systems. Journal of Cereal Science, 2015, 62: 1-7. |
6 | Braaten J T, Wood P J, Scott F W, et al. Oat beta-glucan reduces blood cholesterol concentration in hyper cholesterol emic subjects. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1994, 48(7): 465-474. |
7 | BaeI Y, Kim S M, Lee S, et al. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on cholesterol-lowering activity of oat beta-glucan. New Biotechnology, 2010, 27(1): 85-88. |
8 | Wang H B, Liu D C, Wang H Y, et al. Effect of oat β-glucan on peristalsis and amylase activity of small intestine. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2006, 28(2): 148-151. |
汪海波, 刘大川, 汪海婴, 等. 燕麦β-葡聚糖对小肠蠕动及淀粉酶活性的影响研究. 营养学报, 2006, 28(2): 148-151. | |
9 | Hooda S, Matte J J, Vasanthan T, et al. Dietary oat beta-glucan reduces peak net glucose flux and insulin production and modulates plasma incretin in portal-vein catheterized grower pigs. The Journal of Nutrition, 2010, 140(9): 1564-1569. |
10 | Choromansk A A, Lubinska S, Szewczyk A, et al. Mechanisms of antimelanoma effect of oat β-glucan supported by electroporation. Bioelectrochemistry, 2018, 123(4): 255-259. |
11 | Peerzada R H, Sarver A R, Prashant P S. Structural characterization and evaluation of antioxidant anticancer and hypoglycemic activity of radiation degraded oat (Avena sativa L.) β-glucan. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2018, 144(7): 218-230. |
12 | Ma Z H. Test on the value of oats as forage grass of beef cattle in alpine mountains. Animals Breeding and Feed, 2021, 20(10): 91-92. |
马正华. 高寒山区燕麦作为肉牛饲草的价值试验. 养殖与饲料, 2021, 20(10): 91-92. | |
13 | Ma J F, Yu Y, Wang J D, et al. Effects of oat grass, sultan grass and gao dan grass silage on production performance and meat quality of Tan sheep. Feed Industry, 2018, 39(22): 26-32. |
马吉锋, 于洋, 王建东, 等. 燕麦草、苏丹草、高丹草青贮对滩羊生产性能及肉品质影响的研究. 饲料工业, 2018, 39(22): 26-32. | |
14 | Shi R Z, Ren Z W D, Pian D, et al. Adaptability evaluation of four oat cultivars in Xainza County, Nagqu, Tibet. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(2): 49-54. |
史睿智, 仁增旺堆, 片多, 等. 4个燕麦品种在西藏那曲申扎县的适应性评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(2): 49-54. | |
15 | Zhao Y G, Liu Y, Hou G Q, et al. Performance evaluation of 10 forage oat varieties in different ecological regions of northern Xinjiang. Seed, 2022, 41(3): 111-116, 131. |
赵永刚, 刘彦, 候国庆, 等. 10个饲用燕麦品种在北疆不同生态区的生产性能评价. 种子, 2022, 41(3): 111-116, 131. | |
16 | Zhou Q L, Duo J D Z, Tu D Q P, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of the main agronomic traits and nutritional in 18 oat cultivars introduced to Lhasa. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(3): 550-558. |
周启龙, 多吉顿珠, 土登群培, 等. 拉萨18个引进燕麦品种主要农艺性状和营养成分的遗传多样性分析. 草业科学, 2020, 37(3): 550-558. | |
17 | Nan M, Zhao G Q, Chai J K, et al. Phenotypic diversity and comprehensive evaluations of Avena sativa L. germplasm in semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(6): 1197-1205. |
南铭, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 黄土高原半干旱区饲用燕麦种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1197-1205. | |
18 | Zhou Y X, Fan Y, Ruan J J, et al. Correlation analysis of oat grain nutrition and agronomic traits. Crops, 2021(2): 165-172. |
周月霞, 范昱, 阮景军, 等. 燕麦籽粒营养与农艺性状相关性分析. 作物杂志, 2021(2): 165-172. | |
19 | Xu L J, Liu Q, Xiao S L, et al. Productive performance of oat rotation in spring fallow in Wumeng Mountain Area. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(3): 514-521. |
徐丽君, 柳茜, 肖石良, 等. 乌蒙山区春闲田粮草轮作燕麦的生产性能. 草业科学, 2020, 37(3): 514-521. | |
20 | Zheng D S, Wang X M, Zhang J. Description specification and data standard of oat germplasm resources. Beijing: China Agriculture Science Press, 2006. |
郑殿生, 王晓鸣, 张京. 燕麦种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. | |
21 | China Food and Drug Administration. National food safety standard-determination of fat in food: GB 5009.6-2016. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2017. |
国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定: GB 5009.6-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. | |
22 | China Food and Drug Administration. National food safety standard-determination of protein in foods: GB 5009.5-2016. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2017. |
国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定: GB 5009.5-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. | |
23 | China Food and Drug Administration. National food safety standard-determination of starch in foods: GB 5009.9-2016. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2017. |
国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中淀粉的测定: GB 5009.9-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. | |
24 | Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of β-glucan in cereal and its products: NY/T 2006-2011. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2011. |
中华人民共和国农业农村部. 谷物及其制品中β-葡聚糖含量的测定: NY/T 2006-2011. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011. | |
25 | Lei X, You M H, Bai S Q, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and multivarate evaluation of agronomic traits of 50 oat germplasm lines in northwest Sichuan. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 131-142. |
雷雄, 游明鸿, 白史且, 等. 川西北高原50份燕麦种质农艺性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 131-142. | |
26 | Yang H, Zhao Y J, Liu X J. Effects on photosynthesis characteristics and yield regulations in the alfalfa/oat intercropping. Acta Agriculturae Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 187-195. |
杨航, 赵雅姣, 刘晓静. 紫花苜蓿/燕麦间作的光合特征及其对产量的调控效应. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 187-195. | |
27 | Zhang J C, Ren S L, Bian F, et al. Study on the grain yield and nutritional value of nine oat varieties in the semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau in central Gansu. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(11): 3082-3089. |
张君成, 任生兰, 边芳, 等. 陇中黄土高原半干旱区9个燕麦品种籽粒产量及其营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3082-3089. | |
28 | Cao L X, Zhao S F, Zhao Y G, et al. Effects of variety diversity on yield stability of oat seeds in Bashang region of Hebei Province. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 43(2): 48-55. |
曹丽霞, 赵世峰, 赵艳格, 等. 品种多样性对冀北坝上地区燕麦种子产量稳定性的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(2): 48-55. | |
29 | Bai S S, Zhang W J, Wang Z F, et al. Investigation on the production and utilization of oat and rye forage in the yellow river delta. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2020(3): 63-68. |
柏杉杉, 张文娟, 王兆凤, 等. 黄河三角洲地区麦类饲草生产利用情况调研报告. 草学, 2020(3): 63-68. | |
30 | Shen J C, Wang L, Zhao C X, et al. Analysis of the grain related traits of 77 naked oat varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 156-167. |
沈吉成, 王蕾, 赵彩霞, 等. 77份裸燕麦品种籽粒相关性状分析. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3): 156-167. | |
31 | Jing F, Bian F, Ren S L, et al. Analysis of oat seed yield and related agronomic characteristics in semi-arid regions. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(2): 356-370. |
景芳, 边芳, 任生兰, 等. 半干旱地区燕麦种子产量及其相关农艺性状. 草业科学, 2024, 41(2): 356-370. | |
32 | Basinskiene L, Cizeikiene D. Cereal-based nonalcoholic beverages. Trends in Non-alcoholic Beverages, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816938-4.00003-3. |
33 | Tan S Y, Siow P C, Peh E, et al. Influence of rice, pea and oat proteins in attenuating glycemic response of sugar-sweetened beverages. European Journal of Nutrition, 2017, 57(8): 2795-2803. |
34 | Xu X Y, Wang A N, Lin W J, et al. Evaluation of the protein nutrition quality of oats from different regions. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2012, 32(2): 356-360. |
徐向英, 王岸娜, 林伟静, 等. 不同燕麦品种的蛋白质营养品质评价. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(2): 356-360. | |
35 | Kose E, Doganay O. Multi-environment analysis of grain yield and quality traits in oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi), 2022(28): 278-286. |
36 | Yan Y D, Nie Y Y, Xu L J, et al. Potential excavation and evaluation of functional oat varieties in winter fallow field of southwest mountainous area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 42-53. |
严翊丹, 聂莹莹, 徐丽君, 等. 西南山区冬闲田功能型燕麦品种潜力挖掘评价. 草业学报, 2023, 32(4): 42-53. | |
37 | Xiang Y T, Wang X L, Hu X Z, et al. Lipase activity difference of oat varieties and prediction of low lipase activity variety with high quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4104-4117. |
相玉婷, 王晓龙, 胡新中, 等. 燕麦品种间脂肪酶活性差异及低脂肪酶优质品种的预测. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4104-4117. | |
38 | Gu J Q, Zhong K, Wang L, et al. Effects of varieties on oat starch properties and processing stability. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2014, 29(8): 44-49. |
顾军强, 钟葵, 王立, 等. 品种对燕麦淀粉性质及加工稳定性影响. 中国粮油学报, 2014, 29(8): 44-49. | |
39 | Lin W J, Wu G F, Li C H, et al. Effects of cultivar and environment on nutritional quality of Chinese naked oats. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(6): 1087-1092. |
林伟静, 吴广枫, 李春红, 等. 品种与环境对我国裸燕麦营养品质的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(6): 1087-1092. | |
40 | Zheng C Z, Xu Z P, Zhang Z Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic, quality traits and adaptability of new naked oat varieties (lines). Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 12-21. |
郑成忠, 徐振朋, 张子臻, 等. 裸燕麦新品种(品系)农艺性状、品质性状与适应性综合评价. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(2): 12-21. |
[1] | Wen-pan DU, Gui-qin ZHAO, Ji-kuan CHAI, Li YANG, Jian-gui ZHANG, Yi-chao SHI, Guan-lu ZHANG. Effects of root separation on aboveground biomass, soil nutrient contents, and root characters of intercropped oat and pea [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 25-36. |
[2] | Zhong-li LI, Cong-ze JIANG, Ren-shi MA, Wei GAO, Na SHOU, Yu-ying SHEN, Xian-long YANG. Suitability of five forage sweet sorghum varieties for production in the dry plateau area of Longdong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 50-62. |
[3] | Rui-juan SANG, Chao-jie CUI, Yun HE, Xiao-xia ZHANG, Jin YAO, Chun-yang DONG, Hao SUN, Ying-hua SHI, Xiao-yan ZHU, De-feng LI. Lodging resistance and production performance of 18 autumn-sown forage oat varieties in northern Henan Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 74-85. |
[4] | Jie ZHAO, Heng-guang CHEN, Xiao-meng PEI, Hao YU, Yin-ying XU, Da-gan MAO. Effects of resveratrol supplementation in the perinatal diet on production performance, blood indexes, and transcript abundance of genes encoding inflammatory factors in goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 210-220. |
[5] | Hong-fei LI, Bang-wei ZHOU, Miao ZHANG, Shu-nan SHI, Zhi-jian LI. Adaptability evaluation of different oat varieties introduced in the Hulunbuir region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. |
[6] | Ping MU, Ji-kuan CHAI, Wei-juan SU, Hai-long ZHANG, Gui-qin ZHAO. Phenotype and genetic variation analysis of forward and reverse hybrid progeny from different oat crosses [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 73-86. |
[7] | Qin FENG, Xiao-li HE, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Wang NI, Xia MA, Xue-hua MING, Jian-qiang DENG, Jian LAN. A study of mixed sowing effects for oat and common vetch in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. |
[8] | Yan LI, Fu-long MA, Lu HAN, Hai-zhen WANG. Productivity and adaptability of ‘WL’ alfalfa varieties with different fall dormancy in the extremely arid region of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 139-149. |
[9] | Jin-lan WANG, Xiao-jun WANG, Qi-lin LIU, Guo-ling LIANG, Ze-liang JU, Hong-mei SHI, Xiao-bing WANG, Pei WEN, Qingmeiranding, Wen LI. A multi-trait evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different oat varieties in the Sanjiangyuan area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(10): 83-95. |
[10] | Wen-long LI, Feng LI, Zhong-juan ZHANG, Dian-qing WANG, Huan WANG, Hui-qing JIN, Mu-re TE, Zhi-ling HU, Ya TAO. A performance evaluation of two crops of forage oats per year in the northern Ordos Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 159-168. |
[11] | Jia-min ZHANG, Hao GUAN, Hai-ping LI, Zhi-feng JIA, Xiang MA, Wen-hui LIU, You-jun CHEN, Shi-yong CHEN, Yong-mei JIANG, Li GAN, Qing-ping ZHOU, Li-xue YANG. Effects of oat∶feed pea sowing ratio and lactic acid bacteria addition on crop silage fermentation and ruminal degradation characteristics of the resulting total mixed ration [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 169-181. |
[12] | Chun-yan REN, Guo-ling LIANG, Wen-hui LIU, Kai-qiang LIU, Jia-lei DUAN. Screening and adaptability evaluation of early maturing oats in alpine regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 116-129. |
[13] | Yong-hong SHI, Peng GAO, Zhi-hong FANG, Xiang ZHAO, Wei HAN, Jiang-ming WEI, Lin LIU, Jin-zhen LI. Evaluation of resistance to Colletotrichum cereale and analysis of loss in a field of fifteen imported oat cultivars [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 130-142. |
[14] | Cong-ze JIANG, Na SHOU, Wei GAO, Ren-shi MA, Yu-ying SHEN, Xian-long YANG. A multivariate evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different varieties of silage maize in the dry plateau area of Longdong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 216-228. |
[15] | Yi-dan YAN, Ying-ying NIE, Li-jun XU, Xing-fa GAO, Yan-zhang RAO, Xiong RAO, Hong-zhi ZHANG, Cha-shu ZHAO, Yan-ping ZHU, Yu-bo ZHU. Potential excavation and evaluation of functional oat varieties in winter fallow field of southwest mountainous area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 42-53. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||