Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 27-37.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024214
Previous Articles Next Articles
Teng-fei WANG1,2(
), Xia MA1,2, Jin-long LIU3, Bin WANG1,2, Yi-yin ZHANG1,2, Jia-wang LI1,2, Jiang-ping MA1,2, Xiao-bing WANG1,2, Jian LAN1,2(
)
Received:2024-06-06
Revised:2024-07-29
Online:2025-04-20
Published:2025-02-19
Contact:
Jian LAN
Teng-fei WANG, Xia MA, Jin-long LIU, Bin WANG, Yi-yin ZHANG, Jia-wang LI, Jiang-ping MA, Xiao-bing WANG, Jian LAN. Analysis of the yield, quality and economic benefits from multiple cropping of fodder oats in the Yellow River irrigation area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 27-37.
材料 Material | 品种 Variety | 纯净度 Purity (%) | 发芽率 Germination rate (%) | 千粒重Thousand seeds weight (g) | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 燕麦A. sativa | 喜韵 Xiyun | 98 | 94 | 36.70 | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 毛苕子V. villosa | 土库曼毛苕子 Turkmen hairy vetch | 98 | 85 | 22.70 | |
| 箭筈豌豆V. sativa | 普通箭筈豌豆Common vetch | 92 | 80 | 65.50 |
Table 1 Information of test materials
材料 Material | 品种 Variety | 纯净度 Purity (%) | 发芽率 Germination rate (%) | 千粒重Thousand seeds weight (g) | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 燕麦A. sativa | 喜韵 Xiyun | 98 | 94 | 36.70 | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 毛苕子V. villosa | 土库曼毛苕子 Turkmen hairy vetch | 98 | 85 | 22.70 | |
| 箭筈豌豆V. sativa | 普通箭筈豌豆Common vetch | 92 | 80 | 65.50 |
播种模式 Seeding mode | 处理 Treatment | 播种组合 Seeding combination | 播种量Seeding rate (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
间行混播 Inter-row mixed | YM | 燕麦×毛苕子 A. sativa×V. villosa | 127/52 |
| YJ | 燕麦×箭筈豌豆 A. sativa×V. sativa | 169/60 | |
单播 Monoculture | YD | 燕麦 A. sativa | 180 |
| MD | 毛苕子 V. villosa | 105 | |
| JD | 箭筈豌豆 V. sativa | 150 |
Table 2 Test treatment
播种模式 Seeding mode | 处理 Treatment | 播种组合 Seeding combination | 播种量Seeding rate (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
间行混播 Inter-row mixed | YM | 燕麦×毛苕子 A. sativa×V. villosa | 127/52 |
| YJ | 燕麦×箭筈豌豆 A. sativa×V. sativa | 169/60 | |
单播 Monoculture | YD | 燕麦 A. sativa | 180 |
| MD | 毛苕子 V. villosa | 105 | |
| JD | 箭筈豌豆 V. sativa | 150 |
| 项目 Item | 单价 Unit price |
|---|---|
| 燕麦种子 Oat seed (CNY·kg-1) | 8 |
| 毛苕子种子 Hairy vetch seed (CNY·kg-1) | 20 |
| 箭筈豌豆种子 Common vetch seed (CNY·kg-1) | 15 |
| 灌溉 Irrigation (CNY·hm-2) | 2000 |
| 肥料 Fertilizer (CNY·hm-2) | 650 |
| 人工 Labor (CNY·hm-2) | 3000 |
| 机械 Machinery (CNY·hm-2) | 700 |
| 收割 Harvest (CNY·hm-2) | 750 |
| 燕麦饲草 Oat forage (CNY·t-1) | 2100 |
| 毛苕子饲草 Hairy vetch forage (CNY·t-1) | 3000 |
| 箭筈豌豆饲草 Common vetch forage (CNY·t-1) | 2400 |
Table 3 Input and output categories and forage prices
| 项目 Item | 单价 Unit price |
|---|---|
| 燕麦种子 Oat seed (CNY·kg-1) | 8 |
| 毛苕子种子 Hairy vetch seed (CNY·kg-1) | 20 |
| 箭筈豌豆种子 Common vetch seed (CNY·kg-1) | 15 |
| 灌溉 Irrigation (CNY·hm-2) | 2000 |
| 肥料 Fertilizer (CNY·hm-2) | 650 |
| 人工 Labor (CNY·hm-2) | 3000 |
| 机械 Machinery (CNY·hm-2) | 700 |
| 收割 Harvest (CNY·hm-2) | 750 |
| 燕麦饲草 Oat forage (CNY·t-1) | 2100 |
| 毛苕子饲草 Hairy vetch forage (CNY·t-1) | 3000 |
| 箭筈豌豆饲草 Common vetch forage (CNY·t-1) | 2400 |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%) | 相对饲喂价值 Relative feed value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | YJ | 12.18±0.05d | 52.81±0.80b | 32.93±0.12b | 111.47±1.83c |
| YM | 13.71±0.08c | 51.30±0.49b | 31.66±0.49b | 116.53±1.82c | |
| MD | 18.12±0.04a | 38.79±2.42c | 24.25±0.82d | 169.00±9.09a | |
| JD | 17.32±0.17b | 40.04±0.35c | 30.29±0.12c | 151.75±1.53b | |
| YD | 10.64±0.08e | 60.47±0.37a | 35.38±0.08a | 94.37±0.68d | |
| 2023 | YJ | 12.93±0.03c | 52.73±0.34b | 32.35±0.44ab | 112.39±1.30c |
| YM | 12.95±0.05c | 53.51±1.08b | 31.10±0.81b | 112.56±3.32c | |
| MD | 18.85±0.19a | 35.45±0.05d | 24.54±0.51d | 183.14±1.32a | |
| JD | 17.99±0.29b | 38.85±0.71c | 27.14±0.22c | 162.36±3.25b | |
| YD | 9.88±0.22d | 58.49±1.03a | 33.36±0.14a | 100.13±1.93d |
Table 4 Effects of different treatments on nutritional quality of forage
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%) | 相对饲喂价值 Relative feed value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | YJ | 12.18±0.05d | 52.81±0.80b | 32.93±0.12b | 111.47±1.83c |
| YM | 13.71±0.08c | 51.30±0.49b | 31.66±0.49b | 116.53±1.82c | |
| MD | 18.12±0.04a | 38.79±2.42c | 24.25±0.82d | 169.00±9.09a | |
| JD | 17.32±0.17b | 40.04±0.35c | 30.29±0.12c | 151.75±1.53b | |
| YD | 10.64±0.08e | 60.47±0.37a | 35.38±0.08a | 94.37±0.68d | |
| 2023 | YJ | 12.93±0.03c | 52.73±0.34b | 32.35±0.44ab | 112.39±1.30c |
| YM | 12.95±0.05c | 53.51±1.08b | 31.10±0.81b | 112.56±3.32c | |
| MD | 18.85±0.19a | 35.45±0.05d | 24.54±0.51d | 183.14±1.32a | |
| JD | 17.99±0.29b | 38.85±0.71c | 27.14±0.22c | 162.36±3.25b | |
| YD | 9.88±0.22d | 58.49±1.03a | 33.36±0.14a | 100.13±1.93d |
处理 Treatment | 总收入Gross income | 净收入Net income | 平均Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 支出Expenditure | 总收入Gross income | 净收入Net income | |
| YJ | 18864 | 16715 | 9891 | 7742 | 8973 | 17790 | 8817 |
| YM | 16975 | 15251 | 8165 | 6441 | 8810 | 16113 | 7303 |
| MD | 9174 | 8435 | 324 | -415 | 8850 | 8805 | -45 |
| JD | 8216 | 7719 | -759 | -1256 | 8975 | 7968 | -1007 |
| YD | 16116 | 13956 | 7816 | 5656 | 8300 | 15036 | 6736 |
Table 5 Costs and benefits of different treatments of grassland (CNY·hm-2)
处理 Treatment | 总收入Gross income | 净收入Net income | 平均Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 支出Expenditure | 总收入Gross income | 净收入Net income | |
| YJ | 18864 | 16715 | 9891 | 7742 | 8973 | 17790 | 8817 |
| YM | 16975 | 15251 | 8165 | 6441 | 8810 | 16113 | 7303 |
| MD | 9174 | 8435 | 324 | -415 | 8850 | 8805 | -45 |
| JD | 8216 | 7719 | -759 | -1256 | 8975 | 7968 | -1007 |
| YD | 16116 | 13956 | 7816 | 5656 | 8300 | 15036 | 6736 |
| 1 | Song M, Zhang A L. Cultivated land use transition from the “Greater Food” perspective: Realistic challenges, theoretical logic and implementation paths. China Land Science, 2023, 37(8): 31-41. |
| 宋敏, 张安录. 大食物观视阈下的耕地利用转型:现实挑战、理论逻辑与实现路径. 中国土地科学, 2023, 37(8): 31-41. | |
| 2 | Wang Z H, Li S X, Wang X N, et al. Nitrate nitrogen residue and leaching in dryland soil and influence factors. Soils, 2006, 38(6): 676-681. |
| 王朝辉, 李生秀, 王西娜, 等. 旱地土壤硝态氮残留淋溶及影响因素研究. 土壤, 2006, 38(6): 676-681. | |
| 3 | Sebilo M, Mayer B, Nicolardot B, et al. Long-term fate of nitrate fertilizer in agricultural soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(45): 18185-18189. |
| 4 | Xu Q, Tian X H, Du W H. Effects of mixed sowing of rye and common vetch on forage yield and nutrient quality in alpine pastoral areas. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 49-59. |
| 徐强, 田新会, 杜文华. 高寒牧区黑麦和箭筈豌豆混播对草产量和营养品质的影响研究. 草业学报, 2021, 30(8): 49-59. | |
| 5 | Zhang Y L, Yu T F, Hao F, et al. Effects of fertilization and legume-grass ratio on forage yield and NPK utilization efficiency. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 91-101. |
| 张永亮, 于铁峰, 郝凤, 等. 施肥与混播比例对豆禾混播牧草产量及氮磷钾利用效率的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 91-101. | |
| 6 | Feng Q, He X L, Wang B, et al. A study of mixed sowing effects for oat and common vetch in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. |
| 冯琴, 何小莉, 王斌, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区燕麦与箭筈豌豆的混播效果研究. 草业学报, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. | |
| 7 | Yuan Y L, Tang D, Lu Y, et al. An investigation of multiple crop planting options when following wheat with mixed-cropped forage rape and oats in the Jilin area of northeast China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 167-178. |
| 袁英良, 唐丹, 鲁英, 等. 吉林地区麦后复种饲用油菜与燕麦混播效应研究. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 167-178. | |
| 8 | Zhou J J, Baima G W, Wei W, et al. The effects of grass-legume mixing farming on forage nutritional quality and soil nutrient in alpine zone of Tibet. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(2): 143-149. |
| 周娟娟, 白玛嘎翁, 魏巍, 等. 西藏高寒区禾-豆混播对牧草营养品质及土壤养分的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(2): 143-149. | |
| 9 | Mao L L, Zhang L Z, Li W Q, et al. Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop. Field Crops Research, 2012, 138: 11-20. |
| 10 | Quan X, Wu J X, Yang P Z, et al. Study on the relationship between productivity and species in grassland with mixed-sowed gramineous and leguminous forages in Lhasa river valley. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 657-667. |
| 权欣, 武俊喜, 杨培志, 等. 拉萨河谷禾豆混播草地生产力与种间关系研究. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 657-667. | |
| 11 | Sadeghpour A, Jahanzad E, Esmaeili A, et al. Forage yield, quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi-arid conditions: Additive series. Field Crops Research, 2013, 148: 43-48. |
| 12 | Liu L L, Liu G H, Mai X F, et al. Comprehensive benefits evaluation of spring wheat multiple cropping forage grass in Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2022, 40(1): 50-60. |
| 刘露露, 刘根红, 买晓凤, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区春小麦复种牧草模式的综合效益评价. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(1): 50-60. | |
| 13 | Zhao J H, Li Y, Qian B C, et al. Effects of straw return and tillage on soil properties and yield of multi-cropping peanut after wheat. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(5): 272-280. |
| 赵继浩, 李颖, 钱必长, 等. 秸秆还田与耕作方式对麦后复种花生田土壤性质和产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5): 272-280. | |
| 14 | Xie C H, Ma H Z, Xu H W, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate on growth, grain yield, and nitrogen utilization of multiple cropping proso millet after spring-wheat in irrigation area of Ningxia. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 463-477. |
| 谢呈辉, 马海曌, 许宏伟, 等. 施氮量对宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种糜子生长、产量及氮素利用的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 463-477. | |
| 15 | Wei G Y, Tan J L, Li H, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate and irrigation quota on yield and water and nitrogen utilization of post-spring wheat multiple cropping oilseed rape in Yellow River irrigation area. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(11): 1745-1757. |
| 韦广源, 谭军利, 李红, 等. 施氮量和灌溉定额对引黄灌区麦后复种油菜产量和水氮利用的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2023, 31(11): 1745-1757. | |
| 16 | Fan L, He W S, Jia B. Growth and development rule and analysis of main characters of Brassica napus L. after spring wheat harvesting in irrigated area of Ningxia. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(7): 1355-1359. |
| 范玲, 何文寿, 贾彪. 宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种饲料油菜生长发育规律及其主要性状分析. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(7): 1355-1359. | |
| 17 | Zhang J L, Shi A, Liang X J, et al. Nutrition and feeding value evaluation of multiple cropping of sorghum, sorghum and silage corn after wheat in Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area. Feed Research, 2021, 44(4): 83-87. |
| 张俊丽, 施安, 梁小军, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种高丹草、饲用高粱、青贮玉米营养及饲用价值评定. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(4): 83-87. | |
| 18 | Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 25(3): 202-207. |
| 19 | Ghosh P K. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research, 2004, 88(2/3): 227-237. |
| 20 | Loreau M, Hector A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 2001, 413(6855): 548. |
| 21 | Wilson J B, Agnew A D Q. Positive-feedback switches in plant communities. Advances in Ecological Research, 1992, 23(6): 263-336. |
| 22 | Jiang H. Study on yield, quality and degradation rate of alfalfa and Bromus inermis mixed grassland and its comprehensive evaluation. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2007. |
| 蒋慧. 紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播草地产量、品质和降解率研究及其综合评价. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2007. | |
| 23 | Song Q H, Zhao C Z, Shi Y C, et al. Spatial distribution patterns of specific root lengths of Avena sativa L. and Vicia villosa Roth in mixed-sowing grassland under density dependence in northern slope of Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(2): 497-503. |
| 宋清华, 赵成章, 史元春, 等. 祁连山北坡混播草地密度制约下燕麦和毛苕子比根长分布格局. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(2): 497-503. | |
| 24 | Biswal A K, Kohli A. Cereal flag leaf adaptations for grain yield under drought: knowledge status and gaps. Molecular Breeding, 2013, 31(4): 749-766. |
| 25 | Li J, Du J Y, Yang L, et al. Effects of cross sowing at different times on grassland productivity in the third year of planting in northwest Hebei. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2167-2172. |
| 李军, 杜俊颖, 杨莉, 等. 冀西北地区错期交叉混播对第3年草地生产力的影响. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2167-2172. | |
| 26 | Zhang Y L, Gao K, Yu T F, et al. Effects of sowing patterns on productivity and interspecific relationship of alfalfa-grass mixture system. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(2): 47-57. |
| 张永亮, 高凯, 于铁峰, 等. 禾草种类与混播比例对苜蓿-禾草混播系统生产力及种间关系的影响. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(2): 47-57. | |
| 27 | Zhang Y S, Zhao X Q, Zhou X M. Mixed cropping of oat with three leguminous pasture species in alpine pastoral area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2001, 10(1): 13-19. |
| 张耀生, 赵新全, 周兴民. 高寒牧区三种豆科牧草与燕麦混播的试验研究. 草业学报, 2001, 10(1): 13-19. | |
| 28 | Wang T F, Wang B, Deng J Q, et al. Effect of sowing rate on yield and forage quality of a Dolichos lablab-Sorghum bicolor mixture under drip irrigation in arid areas of Ningxia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 30-40. |
| 王腾飞, 王斌, 邓建强, 等. 宁夏干旱区滴灌条件下拉巴豆不同播种量与甜高粱混播饲草生产性能研究. 草业学报, 2023, 32(3): 30-40. | |
| 29 | Wang B, Dong X, Li M Y, et al. Effects of mixed planting of Dolichos lablab with different sowing rates and silage corn on grassland productivity and forage quality. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834. |
| 王斌, 董秀, 李满有, 等. 不同播量拉巴豆与青贮玉米混播对草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 828-834. | |
| 30 | Wang C, Zhou L B, Zhang G B, et al. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter formation in waxy sorghum to row ratio configurations in waxy sorghum-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2021, 263. |
| 31 | Umesh M R, Angadi S, Begna S, et al. Intercropping and species interactions on physiological and light use characteristics of forage cereals-legumes combinations in semi-arid regions. Field Crops Research, 2023, 290. |
| 32 | Li X L, Shi S L, Huang Z C, et al. Effects of different forage mixed patterns on interspecific relationships in loess hilly areas. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1318-1326. |
| 李兴龙, 师尚礼, 黄宗昌, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同饲草混播模式对种间关系的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1318-1326. | |
| 33 | Raza M A, Gul H, Wang J, et al. Land productivity and water use efficiency of maize-soybean strip intercropping systems in semi-arid areas: A case study in Punjab Province, Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 308. |
| [1] | Hong-fei LI, Bang-wei ZHOU, Miao ZHANG, Shu-nan SHI, Zhi-jian LI. Adaptability evaluation of different oat varieties introduced in the Hulunbuir region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. |
| [2] | Xing-fa GAO, Ying-ying NIE, Li-jun XU, Min YANG, Shu-hua XU, Meng ZHU. Adaptability evaluation of oat introduction in winter fallow field of Wumeng Mountain area under drought condition [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(11): 215-227. |
| [3] | Zhong-juan ZHANG, Xi-yu HAO, Xue WANG, Feng LI, Wen-long LI. Selection and multi-trait evaluation of silage maize varieties suitable for cultivation in the Qiqihar area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(11): 228-240. |
| [4] | Jin-lan WANG, Xiao-jun WANG, Qi-lin LIU, Guo-ling LIANG, Ze-liang JU, Hong-mei SHI, Xiao-bing WANG, Pei WEN, Qingmeiranding, Wen LI. A multi-trait evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different oat varieties in the Sanjiangyuan area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(10): 83-95. |
| [5] | Wen-long LI, Feng LI, Zhong-juan ZHANG, Dian-qing WANG, Huan WANG, Hui-qing JIN, Mu-re TE, Zhi-ling HU, Ya TAO. A performance evaluation of two crops of forage oats per year in the northern Ordos Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 159-168. |
| [6] | Yong-hong SHI, Peng GAO, Zhi-hong FANG, Xiang ZHAO, Wei HAN, Jiang-ming WEI, Lin LIU, Jin-zhen LI. Evaluation of resistance to Colletotrichum cereale and analysis of loss in a field of fifteen imported oat cultivars [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 130-142. |
| [7] | Yan-xia KANG, Yuan-bo JIANG, Guang-ping QI, Min-hua YIN, Yan-lin MA, Jing-hai WANG, Qiong JIA, Zhong-xia TANG, Ai-xia WANG. Effects of Onobrychis viciifolia and Bromus inermis grass mixture sowing and deficit irrigation on grassland water use and production performance [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 115-128. |
| [8] | Cong-ze JIANG, Na SHOU, Wei GAO, Ren-shi MA, Yu-ying SHEN, Xian-long YANG. A multivariate evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different varieties of silage maize in the dry plateau area of Longdong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 216-228. |
| [9] | Yi-dan YAN, Ying-ying NIE, Li-jun XU, Xing-fa GAO, Yan-zhang RAO, Xiong RAO, Hong-zhi ZHANG, Cha-shu ZHAO, Yan-ping ZHU, Yu-bo ZHU. Potential excavation and evaluation of functional oat varieties in winter fallow field of southwest mountainous area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 42-53. |
| [10] | Teng-fei WANG, Bin WANG, Jian-qiang DENG, Man-you LI, Wang NI, Qin FENG, Yun-yun TUO, Jian LAN. Effect of sowing rate on yield and forage quality of a Dolichos lablab-Sorghum bicolor mixture under drip irrigation in arid areas of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 30-40. |
| [11] | Feng LI, Wen-long LI, Xue LI, Zhong-juan ZHANG, Lin-po BAI, Yu-fei ZHAO, Ya TAO. A multi-trait evaluation of the performance of 16 forage oat varieties in central and southern Heilongjiang Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 82-92. |
| [12] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Min-hao CHEN, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Jie BAI, Ming SU. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and substitution with microbial fertilizer on the growth of Elymus nutans [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 53-61. |
| [13] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Shu-chao HUANG, Yan-shan YANG, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Yin-cui ZHANG. Effects of combined application of microbial fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on the growth of Lolium perenne [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 136-143. |
| [14] | Ji-cheng SHEN, Lei WANG, Cai-xia ZHAO, Fa-hui YE, Shi-kai LV, De-mei LIU, Rui-juan LIU, Huai-gang ZHANG, Wen-jie CHEN. Analysis of the grain related traits of 77 naked oat varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 156-167. |
| [15] | Qi-yu LIU, Lan YUN, Yi-fan CHEN, Hong-yu GUO, Zhen LI, Zhi-qi GAO, Jun WANG, Feng-ling SHI. The dynamic analysis of forage yield and interspecific competition in alfalfa-grass mixed pasture [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 181-191. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||