草业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 108-122.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023383
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2023-10-11
修回日期:
2024-01-30
出版日期:
2024-10-20
发布日期:
2024-07-15
通讯作者:
段廷玉
作者简介:
Corresponding author. E-mail: duanty@lzu.edu.cn基金资助:
Qin SHEN(), Rong-chun ZHENG, Zhi-biao NAN, Ting-yu DUAN()
Received:
2023-10-11
Revised:
2024-01-30
Online:
2024-10-20
Published:
2024-07-15
Contact:
Ting-yu DUAN
摘要:
猫尾草是一种多年生丛生型禾本科牧草,其优质高产且有良好的饲用价值,是我国甘肃省岷县重要的牧草和牧民收入来源,但是目前尚缺少对猫尾草种带真菌多样性及其致病性的研究。结合室内分离培养法与高通量测序法对猫尾草的种带真菌多样性及其致病性进行了研究,主要结果如下:自3个供试猫尾草品种中共培养分离出9属13种真菌,分离率前5的真菌为链格孢、燕麦镰孢、伞状毛霉、黑附球菌和谢瓦氏曲霉。高通量测序法从3个猫尾草品种中分离获得2门27属。主要为子囊菌门和担子菌门真菌,由链格孢属、曲霉属、暗球腔菌属、镰刀菌属等组成,品种间α和β多样性差异显著。其中分离培养的8种种带真菌均显著降低了猫尾草种子的发芽率(9.78%~30.67%)和发芽势(10.69%~32.08%)(P<0.05);假青光曲霉处理后,猫尾草种子发芽率最低;链格孢和假青光曲霉显著增加了岷山猫尾草种子的发霉率。研究结果为猫尾草的利用及种传病害的预防提供了理论依据。
申琴, 郑荣春, 南志标, 段廷玉. 猫尾草种带真菌多样性及其对种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(10): 108-122.
Qin SHEN, Rong-chun ZHENG, Zhi-biao NAN, Ting-yu DUAN. Diversity of seed-borne fungi in Phleum pratense and their effects on seed germination and seedling growth[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(10): 108-122.
地区 District | 收获时间 Harvest time (Year) | 保存方式 Storage method | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|---|
岷山 Minshan | 2021 | 室温放置Stored at room temperature | 牧民田间收获Harvested form the fields |
加拿大 Canada | 2019 | 室温放置Stored at room temperature | 购自方正草业公司Purchased from Fangzheng Prataculture Co., Ltd. |
克力玛 Climas | 2020 | 冷库保存Stored in cold storage | 购自百斯特草业公司Purchased from Beijing Best Prataculture Co., Ltd. |
表1 试验所用猫尾草的相关信息
Table 1 Information of P. pratense used in the experiment
地区 District | 收获时间 Harvest time (Year) | 保存方式 Storage method | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|---|
岷山 Minshan | 2021 | 室温放置Stored at room temperature | 牧民田间收获Harvested form the fields |
加拿大 Canada | 2019 | 室温放置Stored at room temperature | 购自方正草业公司Purchased from Fangzheng Prataculture Co., Ltd. |
克力玛 Climas | 2020 | 冷库保存Stored in cold storage | 购自百斯特草业公司Purchased from Beijing Best Prataculture Co., Ltd. |
真菌Fungi | 分离率Isolation rate |
---|---|
链格孢 A. alternata | 19.3 |
燕麦镰孢 F. avenaceum | 8.0 |
伞状毛霉 Lichtheimia corymbifera | 5.3 |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 4.0 |
谢瓦氏曲霉 Aspergillus chevalieri | 3.3 |
假青光曲霉 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | 2.7 |
构巢曲霉 Aspergillus nidulans | 2.7 |
青霉属 Penicillium | 2.4 |
揪子茎点霉 Didymella pomorum | 2.0 |
枝顶孢属 Acremonium | 1.3 |
胶囊青霉 Penicillium capsulatum | 0.8 |
聚多曲霉 Aspergillus sydowii | 0.8 |
诺多氏对角菌 P. nodorum | 0.4 |
表2 3种猫尾草种带真菌的平均分离率
Table 2 The average isolation rate of seed-borne fungi in 3 varieties of P. pratense seeds (%)
真菌Fungi | 分离率Isolation rate |
---|---|
链格孢 A. alternata | 19.3 |
燕麦镰孢 F. avenaceum | 8.0 |
伞状毛霉 Lichtheimia corymbifera | 5.3 |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 4.0 |
谢瓦氏曲霉 Aspergillus chevalieri | 3.3 |
假青光曲霉 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | 2.7 |
构巢曲霉 Aspergillus nidulans | 2.7 |
青霉属 Penicillium | 2.4 |
揪子茎点霉 Didymella pomorum | 2.0 |
枝顶孢属 Acremonium | 1.3 |
胶囊青霉 Penicillium capsulatum | 0.8 |
聚多曲霉 Aspergillus sydowii | 0.8 |
诺多氏对角菌 P. nodorum | 0.4 |
处理 Treatment | 真菌 Fungi | 分离率 Isolation rate | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
岷山猫尾草Minshan | 加拿大猫尾草Canada | 克力玛猫尾草Climas | ||
带稃未消毒 Undisinfected with palea | 燕麦镰孢 Fusarium avenaceum | 14 | - | - |
链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 20 | - | 2 | |
伞状毛霉 Lichtheimia corymbifera | 12 | 4 | - | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 10 | 2 | - | |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 2 | - | 2 | |
诺多氏对角菌Parastagonospora nodorum | 2 | - | - | |
谢瓦氏曲霉Aspergillus chevalieri | - | 10 | - | |
假青光曲霉 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | - | 4 | 2 | |
聚多曲霉 Aspergillus sydowii | - | 2 | 2 | |
构巢曲霉 Aspergillus nidulans | - | - | 6 | |
胶囊青霉 Penicillium capsulatum | - | - | 2 | |
去稃未消毒 Undisinfected without palea | 揪子茎点霉 Didymella pomorum | 4 | - | - |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 6 | 2 | - | |
链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 8 | 10 | 4 | |
燕麦镰孢 Fusarium avenaceum | 8 | - | - | |
假青光曲霉 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | - | 4 | 2 | |
构巢曲霉 Aspergillus nidulans | - | - | 2 | |
胶囊青霉 Penicillium capsulatum | - | - | 2 | |
带稃消毒Disinfected with palea | 燕麦镰孢 Fusarium avenaceum | 2 | - | - |
链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 8 | - | - | |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 2 | - | - | |
揪子茎点霉 Didymella pomorum | 2 | - | - | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 2 | - | - | |
去稃消毒Disinfected without palea | 链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 4 | - | - |
去稃消毒后切开Disinfected without palea and cut | 链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 2 | - | - |
表3 不同处理下不同品种猫尾草中种带真菌的分离率
Table 3 The isolation rate of seed-borne fungi in 3 varieties of P. pratense seeds with different treatments (%)
处理 Treatment | 真菌 Fungi | 分离率 Isolation rate | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
岷山猫尾草Minshan | 加拿大猫尾草Canada | 克力玛猫尾草Climas | ||
带稃未消毒 Undisinfected with palea | 燕麦镰孢 Fusarium avenaceum | 14 | - | - |
链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 20 | - | 2 | |
伞状毛霉 Lichtheimia corymbifera | 12 | 4 | - | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 10 | 2 | - | |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 2 | - | 2 | |
诺多氏对角菌Parastagonospora nodorum | 2 | - | - | |
谢瓦氏曲霉Aspergillus chevalieri | - | 10 | - | |
假青光曲霉 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | - | 4 | 2 | |
聚多曲霉 Aspergillus sydowii | - | 2 | 2 | |
构巢曲霉 Aspergillus nidulans | - | - | 6 | |
胶囊青霉 Penicillium capsulatum | - | - | 2 | |
去稃未消毒 Undisinfected without palea | 揪子茎点霉 Didymella pomorum | 4 | - | - |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 6 | 2 | - | |
链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 8 | 10 | 4 | |
燕麦镰孢 Fusarium avenaceum | 8 | - | - | |
假青光曲霉 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | - | 4 | 2 | |
构巢曲霉 Aspergillus nidulans | - | - | 2 | |
胶囊青霉 Penicillium capsulatum | - | - | 2 | |
带稃消毒Disinfected with palea | 燕麦镰孢 Fusarium avenaceum | 2 | - | - |
链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 8 | - | - | |
黑附球菌 Epicoccum nigrum | 2 | - | - | |
揪子茎点霉 Didymella pomorum | 2 | - | - | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 2 | - | - | |
去稃消毒Disinfected without palea | 链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 4 | - | - |
去稃消毒后切开Disinfected without palea and cut | 链格孢 Alternaria alternata | 2 | - | - |
图1 3个品种不同处理下猫尾草种子的种带真菌OTUA:去稃Palea-free;B:带稃With palea;C:克力玛Climas;D:加拿大Canada;E:岷山Minshan.
Fig. 1 Seed-borne fungi OTU of 3 varieties of P. pratense seeds with different treatments
图2 3个品种猫尾草种带真菌物种组成A和B为科水平,3个品种的种带真菌OUT,A.去稃;B.带稃;C和D为属水平,3个品种的种带真菌OUT,C.去稃;D.带稃。A and B show the seed-borne fungi OUT of three varieties at family level, A. palea-free; B. with palea. C and D show the seed-borne fungi OUT of three varieties at genus level, C. palea-free; D. with pale.
Fig. 2 The seed-borne fungi composition of 3 varieties of P. pratense
图3 相同处理下3个品种猫尾草种带真菌相对丰度Top10(属水平)*,**表明品种间存在显著差异。A.去稃;B.带稃。*,** indicates significant differences among varieties. A. palea-free; B. with palea.
Fig. 3 The top 10 relative abundance of seed-borne fungi in 3 varieties of P. pratense with same treatment (genus level)
图4 3个品种猫尾草不同处理下种带真菌相对丰度Top10(属水平)*表明品种间存在显著差异。A:克力玛,B:加拿大,C:岷山。* indicates significant differences between varieties. A: P. pretense cv. Klima, B: P. pretense cv. Canada; C: P. pretense cv. Minshan.
Fig. 4 The top 10 relative abundance of seed-borne fungi in 3 varieties of P. pratense with different treatments (genus level)
组Group | Sobs | Chao1 | ACE | Shannon | Simpson | Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BuDF | 177.25±8.25ab | 185.82±7.98bc | 188.56±7.69a | 2.08±0.11bc | 0.23±0.03a | 0.9997±0.00007a |
BDF | 182.25±4.29a | 227.82±6.91a | 227.62±5.78a | 2.13±0.05b | 0.21±0.01ab | 0.9993±0.00003d |
CuDF | 84.75±1.70d | 113.62±12.67e | 136.05±16.54b | 1.92±0.06c | 0.23±0.02a | 0.9996±0.00006ab |
CDF | 117.00±1.87c | 163.97±8.43cd | 191.54±23.50a | 2.09±0.01bc | 0.20±0.00ab | 0.9994±0.00004cd |
MuDF | 119.00±2.45c | 155.75±8.20d | 195.30±25.37a | 2.09±0.03bc | 0.19±0.00ab | 0.9995±0.00007bc |
MDF | 167.00±5.61b | 192.97±9.59bc | 191.90±8.18a | 2.33±0.04a | 0.18±0.01b | 0.9995±0.00006bc |
表4 3个品种猫尾草种带真菌Alpha多样性指数
Table 4 The Alpha diversity index among 3 varieties of P. pratense with seed-borne fungi
组Group | Sobs | Chao1 | ACE | Shannon | Simpson | Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BuDF | 177.25±8.25ab | 185.82±7.98bc | 188.56±7.69a | 2.08±0.11bc | 0.23±0.03a | 0.9997±0.00007a |
BDF | 182.25±4.29a | 227.82±6.91a | 227.62±5.78a | 2.13±0.05b | 0.21±0.01ab | 0.9993±0.00003d |
CuDF | 84.75±1.70d | 113.62±12.67e | 136.05±16.54b | 1.92±0.06c | 0.23±0.02a | 0.9996±0.00006ab |
CDF | 117.00±1.87c | 163.97±8.43cd | 191.54±23.50a | 2.09±0.01bc | 0.20±0.00ab | 0.9994±0.00004cd |
MuDF | 119.00±2.45c | 155.75±8.20d | 195.30±25.37a | 2.09±0.03bc | 0.19±0.00ab | 0.9995±0.00007bc |
MDF | 167.00±5.61b | 192.97±9.59bc | 191.90±8.18a | 2.33±0.04a | 0.18±0.01b | 0.9995±0.00006bc |
图6 相同处理下3个品种猫尾草种带真菌Beta多样性热图A:去稃 Palea-free;B:带稃 With palea. BuDF1~4:去稃克力玛 Climas with palea-free;CuDF1~4:去稃加拿大 Canada with palea-free;MuDF1~4:去稃岷山Minshan with palea-free;BDF1~4:带稃克力玛 Climas with palea;CDF1~4:带稃加拿大 Canada with palea;MDF1~4:带稃岷山Minshan with palea;下同 The same below.
Fig. 6 Beta diversity heat map of seed-borne fungi in 3 varieties of P. pratense with the same treatment
组Group | BuDF3 | BuDF4 | BuDF1 | BuDF2 | CuDF4 | CuDF2 | CuDF3 | CuDF1 | MuDF2 | MuDF4 | MuDF1 | MuDF3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BuDF3 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.06 | 2.14 | 2.04 | 1.80 | 1.86 | 1.91 |
BuDF4 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.93 | 1.92 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 1.88 | 1.65 | 1.71 | 1.76 |
BuDF1 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.77 | 1.85 | 1.76 | 1.52 | 1.58 | 1.64 |
BuDF2 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 1.71 | 1.46 | 1.52 | 1.59 |
CuDF4 | 2.07 | 1.93 | 1.79 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
CuDF2 | 2.07 | 1.92 | 1.78 | 1.75 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.81 |
CuDF3 | 2.06 | 1.91 | 1.77 | 1.71 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
CuDF1 | 2.14 | 1.99 | 1.85 | 1.78 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
MuDF2 | 2.04 | 1.88 | 1.76 | 1.71 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.19 |
MuDF4 | 1.80 | 1.65 | 1.52 | 1.46 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.18 |
MuDF1 | 1.86 | 1.71 | 1.58 | 1.52 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.13 |
MuDF3 | 1.91 | 1.76 | 1.64 | 1.59 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
表5 3个品种猫尾草去稃处理下种带真菌Beta多样性差异值
Table 5 The Beta diversity difference value of seed-borne fungi among 3 varieties of P. pratense without palea
组Group | BuDF3 | BuDF4 | BuDF1 | BuDF2 | CuDF4 | CuDF2 | CuDF3 | CuDF1 | MuDF2 | MuDF4 | MuDF1 | MuDF3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BuDF3 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.06 | 2.14 | 2.04 | 1.80 | 1.86 | 1.91 |
BuDF4 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.93 | 1.92 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 1.88 | 1.65 | 1.71 | 1.76 |
BuDF1 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.77 | 1.85 | 1.76 | 1.52 | 1.58 | 1.64 |
BuDF2 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 1.71 | 1.46 | 1.52 | 1.59 |
CuDF4 | 2.07 | 1.93 | 1.79 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
CuDF2 | 2.07 | 1.92 | 1.78 | 1.75 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.81 |
CuDF3 | 2.06 | 1.91 | 1.77 | 1.71 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
CuDF1 | 2.14 | 1.99 | 1.85 | 1.78 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
MuDF2 | 2.04 | 1.88 | 1.76 | 1.71 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.19 |
MuDF4 | 1.80 | 1.65 | 1.52 | 1.46 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.18 |
MuDF1 | 1.86 | 1.71 | 1.58 | 1.52 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.13 |
MuDF3 | 1.91 | 1.76 | 1.64 | 1.59 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
组Group | CDF2 | CDF1 | CDF3 | CDF4 | MDF4 | MDF2 | MDF1 | MDF3 | BDF1 | BDF3 | BDF4 | BDF2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDF2 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 1.17 |
CDF1 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.10 |
CDF3 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
CDF4 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.14 |
BDF1 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
BDF3 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
BDF4 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
BDF2 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
MDF4 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.92 |
MDF2 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
MDF1 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
MDF3 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
表6 3个品种猫尾草带稃处理下种带真菌Beta多样性差异值
Table 6 The Beta diversity difference value of seed-borne fungi among 3 varieties of P. pratense with palea
组Group | CDF2 | CDF1 | CDF3 | CDF4 | MDF4 | MDF2 | MDF1 | MDF3 | BDF1 | BDF3 | BDF4 | BDF2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDF2 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 1.17 |
CDF1 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.10 |
CDF3 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
CDF4 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.14 |
BDF1 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
BDF3 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
BDF4 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
BDF2 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
MDF4 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.92 |
MDF2 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
MDF1 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
MDF3 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
组Group | BDF3 | BDF2 | BDF1 | BDF4 | BuDF3 | BuDF4 | BuDF1 | BuDF2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDF4 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 1.17 | 1.41 | 1.43 |
BDF1 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.77 | 1.16 | 1.36 | 1.36 |
BDF3 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 1.81 | 1.20 | 1.42 | 1.42 |
BDF2 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 1.83 | 1.22 | 1.46 | 1.48 |
BuDF4 | 1.20 | 1.22 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.40 |
BuDF3 | 1.81 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.44 | 0.51 |
BuDF1 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.36 | 1.41 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
BuDF2 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.36 | 1.43 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
表7 克力玛猫尾草不同处理下种带真菌Beta多样性差异值
Table 7 The Beta diversity difference value of seed-borne fungi of Climas with different treatments
组Group | BDF3 | BDF2 | BDF1 | BDF4 | BuDF3 | BuDF4 | BuDF1 | BuDF2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDF4 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 1.17 | 1.41 | 1.43 |
BDF1 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.77 | 1.16 | 1.36 | 1.36 |
BDF3 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 1.81 | 1.20 | 1.42 | 1.42 |
BDF2 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 1.83 | 1.22 | 1.46 | 1.48 |
BuDF4 | 1.20 | 1.22 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.40 |
BuDF3 | 1.81 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.44 | 0.51 |
BuDF1 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.36 | 1.41 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
BuDF2 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.36 | 1.43 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
组Group | CDF1 | CDF2 | CDF3 | CDF4 | CuDF4 | CuDF3 | CuDF1 | CuDF2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDF2 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.11 |
CDF1 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
CDF3 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
CDF4 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
CuDF4 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.17 |
CuDF3 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
CuDF1 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
CuDF2 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
表8 加拿大猫尾草不同处理下种带真菌Beta多样性差异值
Table 8 The Beta diversity difference value of seed-borne fungi of Canada with different treatments
组Group | CDF1 | CDF2 | CDF3 | CDF4 | CuDF4 | CuDF3 | CuDF1 | CuDF2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDF2 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.11 |
CDF1 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
CDF3 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
CDF4 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
CuDF4 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.17 |
CuDF3 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
CuDF1 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
CuDF2 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
图7 3个品种猫尾草不同处理下种带真菌Beta多样性热图A:克力玛 Climas;B:加拿大 Canada;C:岷山Minshan.
Fig. 7 Beta diversity heat map of seed-borne fungi in 3 varieties of P. pratense with different treatments
组Group | MDF4 | MDF1 | MDF3 | MuDF3 | MuDF2 | MDF2 | MuDF1 | MuDF4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDF4 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.24 |
MDF1 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
MDF3 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
MuDF3 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
MuDF2 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
MDF2 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
MuDF1 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
MuDF4 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
表9 岷山猫尾草不同处理下种带真菌Beta多样性差异值
Table 9 The Beta diversity difference value of seed-borne fungi of Minshan with different treatments
组Group | MDF4 | MDF1 | MDF3 | MuDF3 | MuDF2 | MDF2 | MuDF1 | MuDF4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDF4 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.24 |
MDF1 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
MDF3 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
MuDF3 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
MuDF2 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
MDF2 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
MuDF1 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
MuDF4 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
处理 Treatment | 品种 Variety | 发芽率 Germination rate | 第3天发芽势 Germination potential on day 3 | 第5天发芽势 Germination potential on day 5 | 发霉率 Rot rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 岷山Minshan | 89.0±0.6a | 71.0±3.1a | 87.0±0.6a | 1.0±0.6f |
加拿大Canada | 91.3±0.7a | 66.7±2.7ab | 77.3±1.5b | 1.0±0.0f | |
链格孢 A. alternata | 岷山Minshan | 73.3±0.7bcd | 61.3±2.2bcd | 70.3±0.9bcd | 28.3±2.7a |
加拿大Canada | 77.3±2.7b | 57.7±0.7efg | 73.0±3.1bc | 13.0±2.1cd | |
谢瓦氏曲霉 A. chevalieri | 岷山Minshan | 80.3±3.2b | 66.0±2.0abc | 74.7±3.2b | 8.3±1.2de |
加拿大Canada | 78.7±1.3b | 52.0±1.0fg | 72.7±0.9bc | 5.3±0.3ef | |
构巢曲霉 A. nidulans | 岷山Minshan | 74.7±1.2bcd | 71.3±1.8a | 72.0±1.2bc | 3.0±0.6ef |
加拿大Canada | 75.3±6.1bcd | 52.7±1.8fg | 73.7±7.1bc | 1.0±0.0f | |
假青光曲霉 A. pseudoglaucus | 岷山Minshan | 67.3±2.9d | 49.3±2.7gh | 63.0±2.5d | 32.7±0.9a |
加拿大Canada | 68.3±3.2cd | 45.3±3.2h | 65.3±3.8cd | 16.0±1.5bc | |
黑附球菌 E. nigrum | 岷山Minshan | 77.0±1.0b | 61.0±1.5bcd | 75.0±1.5b | 20.0±4.4b |
加拿大Canada | 76.0±1.5bc | 59.7±2.7def | 72.7±2.3bc | 12.0±2.9cd | |
燕麦镰孢 F. avenaceum | 岷山Minshan | 75.7±0.9bc | 60.7±2.7bcd | 75.3±0.3b | 6.0±1.2ef |
加拿大Canada | 77.7±3.2b | 50.7±0.9gh | 75.3±1.8b | 5.0±1.2ef | |
伞状毛霉 L. corymbifera | 岷山Minshan | 79.3±1.5b | 72.3±1.2a | 77.7±1.3b | 1.7±0.3f |
加拿大Canada | 77.7±1.8b | 53.7±1.8efg | 71.3±1.3bc | 1.3±0.9f | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 岷山Minshan | 74.7±3.5bcd | 63.0±2.0bcd | 72.0±3.2bc | 20.7±3.0b |
加拿大Canada | 81.3±0.9b | 49.0±0.0gh | 75.3±1.3b | 13.7±0.7cd |
表10 种带真菌对猫尾草种子发芽率、发芽势和发霉率的影响
Table 10 Effect of seed-borne fungi on germination potential, germination rate and rot rate of P. pratense seeds (%)
处理 Treatment | 品种 Variety | 发芽率 Germination rate | 第3天发芽势 Germination potential on day 3 | 第5天发芽势 Germination potential on day 5 | 发霉率 Rot rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 岷山Minshan | 89.0±0.6a | 71.0±3.1a | 87.0±0.6a | 1.0±0.6f |
加拿大Canada | 91.3±0.7a | 66.7±2.7ab | 77.3±1.5b | 1.0±0.0f | |
链格孢 A. alternata | 岷山Minshan | 73.3±0.7bcd | 61.3±2.2bcd | 70.3±0.9bcd | 28.3±2.7a |
加拿大Canada | 77.3±2.7b | 57.7±0.7efg | 73.0±3.1bc | 13.0±2.1cd | |
谢瓦氏曲霉 A. chevalieri | 岷山Minshan | 80.3±3.2b | 66.0±2.0abc | 74.7±3.2b | 8.3±1.2de |
加拿大Canada | 78.7±1.3b | 52.0±1.0fg | 72.7±0.9bc | 5.3±0.3ef | |
构巢曲霉 A. nidulans | 岷山Minshan | 74.7±1.2bcd | 71.3±1.8a | 72.0±1.2bc | 3.0±0.6ef |
加拿大Canada | 75.3±6.1bcd | 52.7±1.8fg | 73.7±7.1bc | 1.0±0.0f | |
假青光曲霉 A. pseudoglaucus | 岷山Minshan | 67.3±2.9d | 49.3±2.7gh | 63.0±2.5d | 32.7±0.9a |
加拿大Canada | 68.3±3.2cd | 45.3±3.2h | 65.3±3.8cd | 16.0±1.5bc | |
黑附球菌 E. nigrum | 岷山Minshan | 77.0±1.0b | 61.0±1.5bcd | 75.0±1.5b | 20.0±4.4b |
加拿大Canada | 76.0±1.5bc | 59.7±2.7def | 72.7±2.3bc | 12.0±2.9cd | |
燕麦镰孢 F. avenaceum | 岷山Minshan | 75.7±0.9bc | 60.7±2.7bcd | 75.3±0.3b | 6.0±1.2ef |
加拿大Canada | 77.7±3.2b | 50.7±0.9gh | 75.3±1.8b | 5.0±1.2ef | |
伞状毛霉 L. corymbifera | 岷山Minshan | 79.3±1.5b | 72.3±1.2a | 77.7±1.3b | 1.7±0.3f |
加拿大Canada | 77.7±1.8b | 53.7±1.8efg | 71.3±1.3bc | 1.3±0.9f | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 岷山Minshan | 74.7±3.5bcd | 63.0±2.0bcd | 72.0±3.2bc | 20.7±3.0b |
加拿大Canada | 81.3±0.9b | 49.0±0.0gh | 75.3±1.3b | 13.7±0.7cd |
处理 Treatment | 品种 Variety | 苗长 Seedling length | 根长 Root length |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 岷山Minshan | 2.3±0.1ab | 1.3±0.1b |
加拿大Canada | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.0±0.1bcde | |
链格孢 A. alternata | 岷山Minshan | 2.4±0.1a | 1.1±0.1bcd |
加拿大Canada | 2.2±0.1abc | 0.7±0.1de | |
谢瓦氏曲霉 A. chevalieri | 岷山Minshan | 2.2±0.1abc | 1.3±0.1b |
加拿大Canada | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.2±0.1bc | |
构巢曲霉 A. nidulans | 岷山Minshan | 1.9±0.1cd | 1.2±0.1bc |
加拿大Canada | 2.2±0.1abc | 1.1±0.2bcd | |
假青光曲霉 A. pseudoglaucus | 岷山Minshan | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.0±0.1bcde |
加拿大Canada | 2.4±0.1a | 1.3±0.1b | |
黑附球菌 E. nigrum | 岷山Minshan | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.7±0.1a |
加拿大Canada | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.2±0.1b | |
燕麦镰孢 F. avenaceum | 岷山Minshan | 1.8±0.1d | 0.7±0.1e |
加拿大Canada | 1.8±0.1d | 0.8±0.1cde | |
伞状毛霉 L. corymbifera | 岷山Minshan | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.2±0.1b |
加拿大Canada | 1.9±0.1bcd | 1.1±0.1bcd | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 岷山Minshan | 2.0±0.1bcd | 1.8±0.2a |
加拿大Canada | 2.0±0.2bcd | 1.1±0.2bcd |
表11 种带真菌对猫尾草种子幼苗的苗长和根长的影响
Table 11 Seedling length and root length of P. pratense seeds treated with seed-borne fungi (cm)
处理 Treatment | 品种 Variety | 苗长 Seedling length | 根长 Root length |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 岷山Minshan | 2.3±0.1ab | 1.3±0.1b |
加拿大Canada | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.0±0.1bcde | |
链格孢 A. alternata | 岷山Minshan | 2.4±0.1a | 1.1±0.1bcd |
加拿大Canada | 2.2±0.1abc | 0.7±0.1de | |
谢瓦氏曲霉 A. chevalieri | 岷山Minshan | 2.2±0.1abc | 1.3±0.1b |
加拿大Canada | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.2±0.1bc | |
构巢曲霉 A. nidulans | 岷山Minshan | 1.9±0.1cd | 1.2±0.1bc |
加拿大Canada | 2.2±0.1abc | 1.1±0.2bcd | |
假青光曲霉 A. pseudoglaucus | 岷山Minshan | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.0±0.1bcde |
加拿大Canada | 2.4±0.1a | 1.3±0.1b | |
黑附球菌 E. nigrum | 岷山Minshan | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.7±0.1a |
加拿大Canada | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.2±0.1b | |
燕麦镰孢 F. avenaceum | 岷山Minshan | 1.8±0.1d | 0.7±0.1e |
加拿大Canada | 1.8±0.1d | 0.8±0.1cde | |
伞状毛霉 L. corymbifera | 岷山Minshan | 2.1±0.1abc | 1.2±0.1b |
加拿大Canada | 1.9±0.1bcd | 1.1±0.1bcd | |
青霉属 Penicillium | 岷山Minshan | 2.0±0.1bcd | 1.8±0.2a |
加拿大Canada | 2.0±0.2bcd | 1.1±0.2bcd |
1 | Bertelsen J R, Neergaard E, Smedegaard-Petersen V. Fungicidal effects of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole on phyllosphere fungi, senescence and yield of winter wheat. Plant Pathology, 2001, 50(2): 190-205. |
2 | Kumar R, Gupta A. Seed-borne diseases of agricultural crops: Detection, diagnosis andmanagement. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2020. |
3 | Eyre A W, Wang M Y, Oh Y, et al. Identification and characterization of the core rice seed microbiome. Phytobiomes Journal, 2019, 3(2): 82-157. |
4 | Chen T, Nan Z B. Seed-borne fungi infection of Siberian wilfrye: Effects on seed germination and seedling growth. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(2): 96-103. |
陈焘, 南志标. 不同储存年限老芒麦种子种带真菌检测及致病性测定. 草业学报, 2015, 24(2): 96-103. | |
5 | Nan Z B. Seed-borne fungi of Astragalus laxmannii——Environment, pathogenicity and control. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1998(1): 13-19. |
南志标. 沙打旺种带真菌——环境、致病力及防治. 草业学报, 1998(1): 13-19. | |
6 | Nan Z B, Hanson J. Detection of seed-borne fungi in Stylosanthes guianensis, S. hamata, and S. scabra. Seed Science and Technology, 1998, 26(2): 333-345. |
7 | Kong R F. Seed-borne fungi of sudangrass (Sorghum sudanense) and their control. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2009. |
孔瑞芳. 苏丹草(Sorghum sudanense)种带真菌及其防治. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2009. | |
8 | Lei Y H, Kuang W G, Zheng C S, et al. Detection and identification of seed-borne fungi isolated from imported grass seeds. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1): 46-53. |
雷娅红, 况卫刚, 郑春生, 等. 进境草种种带真菌的检测与初步鉴定. 草业科学, 2016, 33(1): 46-53. | |
9 | Li X Z. Study on the evolution and interactions of Epichloë gansuensis with host seed-borne fungi and rhizospheric microorganism. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2017. |
李秀璋. 醉马草内生真菌与宿主种带真菌、根际微生物的互作及其进化研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017. | |
10 | Gao C X. The study of seedborne fungi of Elymus nutans. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2018. |
高晨轩. 垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans)种带真菌的研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2018. | |
11 | Nei X M, Zhao G Q, Lan X J, et al. Effects of producing areas on the seed borne fungi of oat. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(5): 1195-1203. |
聂秀美, 赵桂琴, 兰晓君, 等. 产地对燕麦种带真菌的影响. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1195-1203. | |
12 | Zhang Y W. Effects of Epichloë endophyte on seed associated fungi and disease resistance of wild barley under salt stress conditions. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
张永雯. 内生真菌对野大麦种带真菌及其盐胁迫条件下抗病性的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
13 | Zhang Y, Chen T, Nan Z B, et al. Cattle grazing alters the interaction of seed-borne fungi and two foliar pathogens of Leymus chinensis in a meadow steppe. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2019, 155(1): 207-218. |
14 | Xue F X, Wang X L, Xue C S. The initial report of fungi transmitted by red clover. Pratacultural Science, 1991, 1(1): 45-47. |
薛福祥, 王学礼, 薛春胜. 岷山红三叶草种带真菌检验初报. 草业科学, 1991, 1(1): 45-47. | |
15 | Xue L H. Diversity of seed-borne fungi and diseases in Lolium multiflorum. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2020. |
薛龙海. 多花黑麦草种带真菌及病害多样性的研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2020. | |
16 | Wang H M, Sletten A. Seed transmission of Xanthomonas campestris pvs. graminis and phlei in ryegrass and timothy. Seed Science and Technology, 2000, 28(3): 709-713. |
17 | Sundström O. Choke disease in timothy-seed borne disease and mycotoxins. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Science, 2020. |
18 | Khaledi N, Hassani F. Effect of seed-borne Fusarium species on constituents of essential oils from seeds of black cumin populations. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 2021, 61(3): 229-242. |
19 | Ma T Y, Li Y Z. Species and pathogenicity of seed-borne fungi in 32 varieties of alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 131-139. |
马婷燕, 李彦忠. 32个紫花苜蓿品种的种带真菌种类及致病性研究. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 131-139. | |
20 | Xiao B W, Feng W, Duan T Y. Pathogenicity of seed-borne fungi on Orychophragmus violaceus. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 121-130. |
肖博文, 冯伟, 段廷玉. 二月兰种带真菌致病性研究. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 121-130. | |
21 | Nan Z B, Liu R. Detection of seed-borne fungi in Astragalus laxmannii. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1997(4): 12-17. |
南志标, 刘若. 沙打旺种带真菌检测. 草业学报, 1997(4): 12-17. | |
22 | Bensch K, Braun U, Groenewald J Z, et al. The genus Cladosporium. Studies in Mycology, 2012, 72(1): 379. |
23 | Lager J, Wallenhammar A C. Crop loss from soil-borne pathogens in white clover stands assessed by chemical treatments. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2003, 110(2): 120-128. |
24 | Hafez M, Gourlie R, Despins T, et al. Parastagonospora nodorum and related species in western Canada: Genetic variability and effector genes. Phytopathology, 2020, 110(12): 1946-1958. |
25 | Kariyawasam G K, Richards J K, Wyatt N A, et al. The Parastagonospora nodorum necrotrophic effector SnTox5 targets the wheat gene Snn5 and facilitates entry into the leaf mesophyll. New Phytologist, 2022, 233(1): 409-426. |
26 | Wang M Q. Study of Phoma in Northeast China. Jilin: Jilin Agricultural University, 2019. |
王梦奇. 东北地区茎点霉属真菌研究. 吉林: 吉林农业大学, 2019. | |
27 | Li H Y, Lou Q Z, Fan G H, et al. Isolation and identification of Didymella pomorum from America soybean. Plant Quarantine, 2017, 31(4): 34-37. |
李海云, 娄巧哲, 范光辉, 等. 美国进境大豆中楸子茎点霉的分离鉴定. 植物检疫, 2017, 31(4): 34-37. | |
28 | Liu W Z, Gao Z J, Lyu P K, et al. Two new diseases of eggplant and loofah. Plant Protection Technology and Extension, 1996(4): 39. |
刘文珍, 高振江, 吕佩珂, 等. 茄子、丝瓜的两种新病害. 中国植保导刊, 1996(4): 39. | |
29 | Han W. Preliminary study of fungi endophytes of tobacco in Yunnan. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2004. |
韩伟. 云南烟草内生真菌生物多样性初步研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2004. | |
30 | Vemić A, Popović V, Janoušek J, et al. Destruction of Fraxinus angustifolia and Fraxinus ornus seeds under storage conditions caused by Epicoccum nigrum. Forest Pathology, 2023, 53(2): e12804. |
31 | Yago J I, Roh J H, Bae S D, et al. The effect of seed-borne mycoflora from sorghum and foxtail millet seeds on germination and disease transmission. Mycobiology, 2011, 39(3): 206-218. |
32 | Xianmixinuer·Rouzi, Li K M, Atikaimu·Ruzi, et al. Detection and identification of eleven kinds of alfalfa seed-borne fungi. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(7): 1281-1287. |
先米西努尔·肉孜, 李克梅, 阿提开姆·如则, 等. 11个苜蓿品种种子寄藏真菌检测与鉴定. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(7): 1281-1287. | |
33 | Li C J, Nan Z B. Seed-borne fungi and their pathogenicity in alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2000(1): 27-36. |
李春杰, 南志标. 苜蓿种带真菌及其致病性测定. 草业学报, 2000(1): 27-36. |
[1] | 姚佳妮, 刘爽, 张钧杰, 胡明珠, 代金霞. 宁夏荒漠草原典型灌丛根际土壤酶活性及微生物代谢多样性[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 1-14. |
[2] | 贺世龙, 叶贺, 李静, 张雅玲, 德海山, 红梅. 不同时限氮沉降和降水变化对荒漠草原中小型土壤节肢动物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 140-154. |
[3] | 郑荣春, 南志标, 段廷玉. 四个品种红三叶种带真菌多样性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 170-180. |
[4] | 刘倩, 丁彦芬, 宋杉杉, 许文婕, 杨威. 南京明城墙绿带草本层自生植物群落数量分类与排序分析[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 1-15. |
[5] | 刘爽, 姚佳妮, 张钧杰, 代金霞. 荒漠豆科灌丛根际土壤氨氧化和反硝化微生物功能基因丰度及群落多样性特征[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 115-127. |
[6] | 申迪, 曾子铭, 庞凯悦, 柴沙驼, 聂洪辛, 李毓敏, 廖扬, 王迅, 黄伟华, 刘书杰, 杨英魁, 王书祥. 低精料日粮和高精料日粮对牦牛生长性能和瘤胃菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 155-165. |
[7] | 索晓晶, 项磊, 高贺, 运向军, 哈斯巴根, 吴金蕊, 董文成, 滑博伟, 牟金燚, 王琪. 不同利用方式对大针茅草原植被群落特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(4): 12-21. |
[8] | 苏尧, 叶苏梅, 鲁梦醒, 马跃, 王玉宝, 王珊珊, 柴如山, 叶新新, 张震, 马超. 整合分析秸秆还田对农田杂草多度和多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(3): 150-160. |
[9] | 雷颖, 罗杰, 郭旭曼, 秘二停, 刘锦春. 小生境尺度下喀斯特弃耕地植物多样性、生物量及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(2): 28-38. |
[10] | 周建玲, 梁巧兰, 魏列新, 周其宇, 田龙, 陈应娥, 王存颖, 张国印. 不同症状类型苜蓿病毒病AMV病原检测及其寄主范围测定[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(1): 126-137. |
[11] | 凤紫棋, 孙文义, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 陈帅. 南方山区杉木人工林林下草本植物多样性的影响因素[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 17-26. |
[12] | 吉轶楠, 任雪锋, 苟甜甜, 臧国长, 郑轶琦. 基于SSR标记的河南省假俭草群体遗传多样性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 198-212. |
[13] | 者玉琦, 武志娟, 王吉坤, 钟金城, 柴志欣, 信金伟. 基于mtDNA COX3基因对西藏特色牦牛群体遗传结构的分析[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 231-240. |
[14] | 刘增辉, 卢素锦, 王雨欣, 张春辉, 尹鑫. 三江源地区人工克隆植物群落生物多样性对初级生产力的影响及机制[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 27-38. |
[15] | 赵敏, 赵坤, 王赟博, 殷国梅, 刘思博, 闫宝龙, 孟卫军, 吕世杰, 韩国栋. 长期放牧干扰降低了短花针茅荒漠草原植物多样性[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 39-49. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||