Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 182-192.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025259
Yu-feng TENG1,2(
), Jian MA1,2, Bin CHEN1,2, Yan-fang LU1,2, Jing LI1,2, Xing LI1,2, Ning LI1,2, Hong-ru LI1,2
Received:2025-06-26
Revised:2025-10-13
Online:2026-08-20
Published:2026-06-22
Yu-feng TENG, Jian MA, Bin CHEN, Yan-fang LU, Jing LI, Xing LI, Ning LI, Hong-ru LI. Characteristics of the bud bank in and around plateau pika mounds in the alpine meadow on the northern slopes of the Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(8): 182-192.
| 序号No. | 植物种 Plant species | 科 Family | 属 Genus | 生活型 Life form | BBT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae | 莎草科Cyperaceae | 薹草属Carex | PH | RB、TB |
| 2 | 高山嵩草C. parvula | 莎草科Cyperaceae | 薹草属Carex | PH | - |
| 3 | 等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix | 蔷薇科Rosaceae | 委陵菜属Potentilla | PH | RB、TB |
| 4 | 丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa | 蔷薇科Rosaceae | 委陵菜属Potentilla | PH | RSB |
| 5 | 早熟禾P. annua | 禾本科Poaceae | 早熟禾属Poa | PH | TB |
| 6 | 冰草A. cristatum | 禾本科Poaceae | 冰草属Agropyron | PH | TB |
| 7 | 西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum | 蓼科Polygonaceae | 蓼属Polygonum | PH | RB |
| 8 | 小大黄R. pumilum | 蓼科Polygonaceae | 大黄属Rheum | PH | RSB |
| 9 | 米蒿A. dalai-lamae | 菊科Asteraceae | 蒿属Artemisia | PH | RB |
| 10 | 矮火绒草L. nanum | 菊科Asteraceae | 火绒草属Leontopodium | PH | RB |
| 11 | 肉果草L. tibetica | 玄参科Scrophulariaceae | 肉果草属Lancea | PH | RB、TB |
| 12 | 高山唐松草T. alpinum | 毛茛科Ranunculaceae | 唐松草属Thalictrum | PH | RSB |
| 13 | 密花棘豆O. imbricata | 豆科Fabaceae | 棘豆属Oxytropis | PH | TB |
| 14 | 刺芒龙胆G. aristata | 龙胆科Gentianaceae | 龙胆属Gentiana | AH | TB |
Table 1 Composition of aboveground vegetation and types of underground bud banks in the mound
| 序号No. | 植物种 Plant species | 科 Family | 属 Genus | 生活型 Life form | BBT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae | 莎草科Cyperaceae | 薹草属Carex | PH | RB、TB |
| 2 | 高山嵩草C. parvula | 莎草科Cyperaceae | 薹草属Carex | PH | - |
| 3 | 等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix | 蔷薇科Rosaceae | 委陵菜属Potentilla | PH | RB、TB |
| 4 | 丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa | 蔷薇科Rosaceae | 委陵菜属Potentilla | PH | RSB |
| 5 | 早熟禾P. annua | 禾本科Poaceae | 早熟禾属Poa | PH | TB |
| 6 | 冰草A. cristatum | 禾本科Poaceae | 冰草属Agropyron | PH | TB |
| 7 | 西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum | 蓼科Polygonaceae | 蓼属Polygonum | PH | RB |
| 8 | 小大黄R. pumilum | 蓼科Polygonaceae | 大黄属Rheum | PH | RSB |
| 9 | 米蒿A. dalai-lamae | 菊科Asteraceae | 蒿属Artemisia | PH | RB |
| 10 | 矮火绒草L. nanum | 菊科Asteraceae | 火绒草属Leontopodium | PH | RB |
| 11 | 肉果草L. tibetica | 玄参科Scrophulariaceae | 肉果草属Lancea | PH | RB、TB |
| 12 | 高山唐松草T. alpinum | 毛茛科Ranunculaceae | 唐松草属Thalictrum | PH | RSB |
| 13 | 密花棘豆O. imbricata | 豆科Fabaceae | 棘豆属Oxytropis | PH | TB |
| 14 | 刺芒龙胆G. aristata | 龙胆科Gentianaceae | 龙胆属Gentiana | AH | TB |
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SR | VC (%) | PD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix | 2.00±0.58aA | 3.10±0.38aA | 104.00±0.57aA |
| OM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum | 5.00±0.58bB | 65.30±0.35bB | 1501.00±3.06bB |
| AM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、高山唐松草T. alpinum、早熟禾 P. annua | 7.00±0.57cBC | 97.40±0.63cC | 4308.00±1.15cC |
| CK | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、高山唐松草 T. alpinum、早熟禾 P. annua、刺芒龙胆G. aristata | 8.00±0.57cC | 99.80±0.11dC | 4672.00±34.06dD |
Table 2 Characteristics of aboveground vegetation in mound of different ages
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SR | VC (%) | PD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix | 2.00±0.58aA | 3.10±0.38aA | 104.00±0.57aA |
| OM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum | 5.00±0.58bB | 65.30±0.35bB | 1501.00±3.06bB |
| AM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、高山唐松草T. alpinum、早熟禾 P. annua | 7.00±0.57cBC | 97.40±0.63cC | 4308.00±1.15cC |
| CK | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、高山唐松草 T. alpinum、早熟禾 P. annua、刺芒龙胆G. aristata | 8.00±0.57cC | 99.80±0.11dC | 4672.00±34.06dD |
变异来源 SOV | 地上植被The aboveground vegetation | 地下芽库The underground bud bank | F0.05 | F0.01 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | SR | VC | PD | df | SN | Total | RBD | TBD | RSBD | |||
| BG | 3 | 28.00** | 11907.19** | 16664.43** | 3 | 99.00** | 34336.99** | 4912.07** | 216232.75** | 117.87** | 4.07 | 7.59 |
| WG | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||
| 总和Sum | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||
Table 3 Analysis of variance for characteristics of aboveground vegetation and underground bud bank on mound of different ages
变异来源 SOV | 地上植被The aboveground vegetation | 地下芽库The underground bud bank | F0.05 | F0.01 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | SR | VC | PD | df | SN | Total | RBD | TBD | RSBD | |||
| BG | 3 | 28.00** | 11907.19** | 16664.43** | 3 | 99.00** | 34336.99** | 4912.07** | 216232.75** | 117.87** | 4.07 | 7.59 |
| WG | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||
| 总和Sum | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SN | Total (No.·m-2) | RBD (No.·m-2) | TBD (No.·m-2) | RSBD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix | 2.00±0.00aA | 1901.33±0.88aA | 1838.00±2.08aA | 63.33±1.45aA | 0.00±0.00aA |
| OM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、早熟禾P. annua、高山唐松草T. alpinum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、小大黄R. pumilum、冰草A. cristatum | 7.00±0.57bB | 3653.33±7.22bB | 2537.00±3.21bB | 1065.33±1.76bB | 51.00±4.51cC |
| AM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、肉果草L. tibetica、米蒿A. dalai-lamae、密花棘豆O. imbricata、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、冰草A. cristatum、早熟禾P. annua、小大黄R. pumilum | 8.00±0.57cB | 6127.00±21.70cC | 3321.00±17.04dD | 2803.00±4.93cC | 3.00±0.58aA |
| CK | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、早熟禾P. annua、肉果草L. tibetica | 8.00±0.58cB | 6612.00±6.43dD | 2965.00±5.13cC | 3629.00±4.36dD | 18.00±1.00bB |
Table 4 Characteristics of underground bud bank in mound of different ages
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SN | Total (No.·m-2) | RBD (No.·m-2) | TBD (No.·m-2) | RSBD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix | 2.00±0.00aA | 1901.33±0.88aA | 1838.00±2.08aA | 63.33±1.45aA | 0.00±0.00aA |
| OM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、早熟禾P. annua、高山唐松草T. alpinum、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、小大黄R. pumilum、冰草A. cristatum | 7.00±0.57bB | 3653.33±7.22bB | 2537.00±3.21bB | 1065.33±1.76bB | 51.00±4.51cC |
| AM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、肉果草L. tibetica、米蒿A. dalai-lamae、密花棘豆O. imbricata、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、冰草A. cristatum、早熟禾P. annua、小大黄R. pumilum | 8.00±0.57cB | 6127.00±21.70cC | 3321.00±17.04dD | 2803.00±4.93cC | 3.00±0.58aA |
| CK | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、早熟禾P. annua、肉果草L. tibetica | 8.00±0.58cB | 6612.00±6.43dD | 2965.00±5.13cC | 3629.00±4.36dD | 18.00±1.00bB |
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SR | VC (%) | PD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、矮火绒草L. nanum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 7.00±0.58a | 99.00±0.58a | 4673.00±6.35a |
| OM | 西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、小大黄R. pumilum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、密花棘豆O. imbricata、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae | 8.00±0.00a | 99.00±0.00a | 4674.00±42.44a |
| AM | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.57a | 99.67±0.33a | 4674.00±37.51a |
| CK | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.57a | 99.67±0.33a | 4673.33±27.45a |
Table 5 Aboveground vegetation characteristics of mound edge area of different ages
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SR | VC (%) | PD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、矮火绒草L. nanum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 7.00±0.58a | 99.00±0.58a | 4673.00±6.35a |
| OM | 西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、小大黄R. pumilum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、密花棘豆O. imbricata、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae | 8.00±0.00a | 99.00±0.00a | 4674.00±42.44a |
| AM | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.57a | 99.67±0.33a | 4674.00±37.51a |
| CK | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.57a | 99.67±0.33a | 4673.33±27.45a |
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SN | Total (No.·m-2) | RBD (No.·m-2) | TBD (No.·m-2) | RSBD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、矮火绒草L. nanum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 7.00±0.58a | 6699.33±9.94a | 2004.67±6.69a | 4680.33±3.38a | 14.33±0.67a |
| OM | 西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、小大黄R. pumilum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、密花棘豆O. imbricata、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae | 8.00±0.00a | 6707.67±27.33a | 2009.67±28.71a | 4682.33±5.49a | 15.67±4.33a |
| AM | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.00a | 6716.00±15.13a | 2006.00±10.26a | 4693.33±11.46a | 16.67±4.10a |
| CK | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.00a | 6619.34±5.46a | 2024.67±12.02a | 4675.67±6.74a | 19.00±1.73a |
Table 6 Characteristics of the underground bud bank in mound adge area of different ages
| 鼠丘Mound | 植物种 Plant species | SN | Total (No.·m-2) | RBD (No.·m-2) | TBD (No.·m-2) | RSBD (No.·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、矮火绒草L. nanum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 7.00±0.58a | 6699.33±9.94a | 2004.67±6.69a | 4680.33±3.38a | 14.33±0.67a |
| OM | 西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、小大黄R. pumilum、肉果草L. tibetica、高山嵩草C. parvula、高山唐松草T. alpinum、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、密花棘豆O. imbricata、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae | 8.00±0.00a | 6707.67±27.33a | 2009.67±28.71a | 4682.33±5.49a | 15.67±4.33a |
| AM | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、等齿委陵菜P. simulatrix、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.00a | 6716.00±15.13a | 2006.00±10.26a | 4693.33±11.46a | 16.67±4.10a |
| CK | 高山唐松草T. alpinum、高山嵩草C. parvula、小大黄R. pumilum、无穗柄薹草C. ivanoviae、西伯利亚蓼P. sibiricum、丛生钉柱委陵菜P. saundersiana var. caespitosa、刺芒龙胆G. aristata、密花棘豆O. imbricata | 8.00±0.00a | 6619.34±5.46a | 2024.67±12.02a | 4675.67±6.74a | 19.00±1.73a |
位置 Location | 项目 Item | 指标 Index | 鼠丘Mound | 鼠丘边缘区The edge zone of mound | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 地上植被AV | 地下芽库UBB | 地上植被AV | 地下芽库UBB | ||||||||||||||
| SR | VC | PD | SN | Total | TBD | RBD | RSBD | SR | VC | PD | SN | Total | TBD | RBD | |||
鼠丘 Mound | AV | VC | 0.955** | ||||||||||||||
| PD | 0.942** | 0.943** | |||||||||||||||
| UBB | SN | 0.914** | 0.981** | 0.861** | |||||||||||||
| Total | 0.957** | 0.962** | 0.997** | 0.893** | |||||||||||||
| TBD | 0.947** | 0.954** | 0.999** | 0.879** | 0.998** | ||||||||||||
| RBD | 0.964** | 0.964** | 0.990** | 0.900** | 0.997** | 0.991** | |||||||||||
| RSBD | 0.119 | 0.199 | -0.110 | 0.367 | -0.039 | -0.083 | 0.013 | ||||||||||
鼠丘 边缘区 Edge area of mound | AV | SR | 0.302 | 0.490 | 0.224 | 0.615* | 0.281 | 0.252 | 0.308 | 0.763** | |||||||
| VC | 0.396 | 0.441 | 0.515 | 0.376 | 0.508 | 0.508 | 0.488 | -0.190 | 0.164 | ||||||||
| PD | 0.089 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.054 | 0.057 | 0.068 | |||||||
| UBB | SN | 0.504 | 0.685* | 0.558 | 0.718** | 0.589* | 0.574 | 0.599* | 0.369 | 0.857** | 0.449 | 0.074 | |||||
| Total | 0.213 | 0.304 | 0.311 | 0.286 | 0.312 | 0.309 | 0.309 | 0.128 | 0.214 | 0.484 | 0.343 | 0.344 | |||||
| TBD | 0.934** | 0.948** | 0.996** | 0.872** | 0.993** | 0.998** | 0.981** | -0.115 | 0.238 | 0.507 | 0.000 | 0.566 | 0.308 | ||||
| RBD | -0.938** | -0.955** | -0.995** | -0.883** | -0.994** | -0.998** | -0.983** | 0.096 | -0.258 | -0.504 | 0.002 | -0.579* | -0.299 | -1.000** | |||
| RSBD | 0.054 | 0.156 | -0.176 | 0.337 | -0.107 | -0.143 | -0.068 | 0.968** | 0.774** | -0.233 | 0.088 | 0.353 | 0.047 | -0.162 | 0.141 | ||
Table 7 Pearson correlation coefficients between aboveground vegetation characteristics and underground bud banks characteristics in mounds and their edge areas
位置 Location | 项目 Item | 指标 Index | 鼠丘Mound | 鼠丘边缘区The edge zone of mound | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 地上植被AV | 地下芽库UBB | 地上植被AV | 地下芽库UBB | ||||||||||||||
| SR | VC | PD | SN | Total | TBD | RBD | RSBD | SR | VC | PD | SN | Total | TBD | RBD | |||
鼠丘 Mound | AV | VC | 0.955** | ||||||||||||||
| PD | 0.942** | 0.943** | |||||||||||||||
| UBB | SN | 0.914** | 0.981** | 0.861** | |||||||||||||
| Total | 0.957** | 0.962** | 0.997** | 0.893** | |||||||||||||
| TBD | 0.947** | 0.954** | 0.999** | 0.879** | 0.998** | ||||||||||||
| RBD | 0.964** | 0.964** | 0.990** | 0.900** | 0.997** | 0.991** | |||||||||||
| RSBD | 0.119 | 0.199 | -0.110 | 0.367 | -0.039 | -0.083 | 0.013 | ||||||||||
鼠丘 边缘区 Edge area of mound | AV | SR | 0.302 | 0.490 | 0.224 | 0.615* | 0.281 | 0.252 | 0.308 | 0.763** | |||||||
| VC | 0.396 | 0.441 | 0.515 | 0.376 | 0.508 | 0.508 | 0.488 | -0.190 | 0.164 | ||||||||
| PD | 0.089 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.054 | 0.057 | 0.068 | |||||||
| UBB | SN | 0.504 | 0.685* | 0.558 | 0.718** | 0.589* | 0.574 | 0.599* | 0.369 | 0.857** | 0.449 | 0.074 | |||||
| Total | 0.213 | 0.304 | 0.311 | 0.286 | 0.312 | 0.309 | 0.309 | 0.128 | 0.214 | 0.484 | 0.343 | 0.344 | |||||
| TBD | 0.934** | 0.948** | 0.996** | 0.872** | 0.993** | 0.998** | 0.981** | -0.115 | 0.238 | 0.507 | 0.000 | 0.566 | 0.308 | ||||
| RBD | -0.938** | -0.955** | -0.995** | -0.883** | -0.994** | -0.998** | -0.983** | 0.096 | -0.258 | -0.504 | 0.002 | -0.579* | -0.299 | -1.000** | |||
| RSBD | 0.054 | 0.156 | -0.176 | 0.337 | -0.107 | -0.143 | -0.068 | 0.968** | 0.774** | -0.233 | 0.088 | 0.353 | 0.047 | -0.162 | 0.141 | ||
| [1] | Duan Y Y, Wu T, Wang N, et al. Changes of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus storage of different years in a bare patch of plateau pika in eastern Qinghai Province. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(8): 1814-1823. |
| 段媛媛, 吴彤, 王妮, 等. 青海省东部高原鼠兔不同年限裸斑处土壤碳氮磷储量的变化. 草业科学, 2024, 41(8): 1814-1823. | |
| [2] | Chen J J, Yi S H, Qin Y. The contribution of plateau pika disturbance and erosion on patchy alpine grassland soil on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: Implications for grassland restoration. Geoderma, 2017, 297: 1-9. |
| [3] | Pang X P, Yu C Q, Zhang J, et al. Effect of disturbance by plateau pika on soil nitrogen stocks in alpine meadows. Geoderma, 2020, 372: 114392. |
| [4] | Teniwu, Guo Z Y, Liu D, et al. Responses of belowground bud bank to simulated extreme drought in the meadow steppe of Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(3): 759-765. |
| 特尼乌, 郭子月, 刘丹, 等. 内蒙古草甸草原地下芽库对极端干旱的响应. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(3):759-765. | |
| [5] | Wang Q. Effect of disturbance by plateau pika on the characteristics of belowground bud bank and soil seed bank in alpine meadows. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2022. |
| 王倩. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草甸植物地下芽库和土壤种子库特征的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2022. | |
| [6] | Liu W L, Ma Y J, Wu Y N, et al. Effects of plateau pika’s disturbance on soil nutrients, microbial biomass C and N of different land surface types in Qinghai Lake watershed. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2018, 54(2): 254-260. |
| 刘文玲, 马育军, 吴艺楠, 等. 青海湖流域高原鼠兔扰动对土壤养分及微生物量碳氮的影响. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 54(2): 254-260. | |
| [7] | Wilkinson M T, Richards P J, Humphreys G S. Breaking ground: Pedological, geological, and ecological implications of soil bioturbation. Earth-Science Reviews, 2009, 97(1): 257-271. |
| [8] | Zhang Y M, Liu J K. The biological characteristics of subterranean rodents and their roles in ecosystem. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2002, 22(2): 144-154. |
| 张堰铭, 刘季科. 地下鼠生物学特征及其在生态系统中的作用. 兽类学报, 2002, 22(2): 144-154. | |
| [9] | Wei X H, Li S, Yang P, et al. Changes of soil physical and chemical property of alpine kobresia meadow around the plateau pika entrances in the process of erosion. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2006, 28(4): 24-29. |
| 魏兴琥, 李森, 杨萍, 等. 高原鼠兔洞口区侵蚀过程高山草甸土壤的变化. 中国草地学报, 2006, 28(4): 24-29. | |
| [10] | Li W J, Zhang Y M. Impacts of plateau pikas on soil organic matter and moisture content in alpine meadow. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2006, 26(4): 331-337. |
| 李文靖, 张堰铭. 高原鼠兔对高寒草甸土壤有机质及湿度的作用. 兽类学报, 2006, 26(4): 331-337. | |
| [11] | Inouye R S, Huntly N J, Tilman D, et al. Pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius), vegetation, and soil nitrogen along a successional sere in east central Minnesota. Oecologia, 1987, 72(2): 178-184. |
| [12] | Liu W L, Ma Y J, Wu Y N, et al. Effects of plateau pika’s disturbance on soil moisture characteristics of different land surface types in Qinghai Lake watershed. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 15(2): 62-69. |
| 刘文玲, 马育军, 吴艺楠, 等. 青海湖流域高原鼠兔扰动对不同地表类型土壤水分特征的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2017, 15(2): 62-69. | |
| [13] | Liu W, Zhou H K, Zhou L. Biomass distribution pattern of degraded grassland in alpine meadow. Grassland of China, 2005, 27(2): 9-15. |
| 刘伟, 周华坤, 周立. 不同程度退化草地生物量的分布模式. 中国草地, 2005, 27(2): 9-15. | |
| [14] | Yang Y B, Xin X J, Aidexiecuo, et al. Plant diversity variations in zokor-mound communities along a successional stage in sub-alpine meadow. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(1): 14-20. |
| 杨莹博, 辛小娟, 艾得协措, 等. 鼢鼠土丘植被恢复演替过程中的物种多样性变化. 草业学报, 2010, 19(1): 14-20. | |
| [15] | Klimešová J, Klimeš L. Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration-A literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2007, 8(3): 115-129. |
| [16] | Cui W, Zhao L P, Zhao F R. Effects of fencing and grazing management on bud bank in a semiarid steppe on the Loess Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(1): 9-15. |
| 崔伟, 赵凌平, 赵芙蓉. 封育和放牧对黄土高原典型草原芽库的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 34(1): 9-15. | |
| [17] | Bai X. Effects of enclosure duration on offspring recruitment and bud bank in semiarid steppe on the Loess Plateau. Luoyang: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2017. |
| 白欣. 封育年限对繁殖更新与芽库的影响. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2017. | |
| [18] | Hartnett D C, Setshogo M P, Dalgleish H J. Bud banks of perennial savanna grasses in Botswana. African Journal of Ecology, 2006, 44(2): 256-263. |
| [19] | Wang J W. Study on dynamics of bud bank in restoration succession series of degraded grassland in the Songnen Plain of China. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2005. |
| 王俊炜. 松嫩平原退化草地恢复演替系列芽库动态的研究. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2005. | |
| [20] | Benson E J, Hartnett D C. The role of seed and vegetative reproduction in plant recruitment and demography in tallgrass prairie. Plant Ecology, 2006, 187: 163-178. |
| [21] | Tao J, Tian J T, Li D M, et al. Effects of fertilization timing on belowground bud bank and its relationship with aboveground vegetation of degraded meadow steppe. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2025, 44(3): 755-762. |
| 陶金, 田家泰, 李冬梅, 等. 不同施肥时间对退化草甸草原地下芽库及其与地上植被关系的影响. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(3): 755-762. | |
| [22] | Chen Y Y, Li J, Zhou S,et al. Method for evaluating the effects of plateau pika disturbance on the value of alpine meadow ecosystem services.Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(1): 187-201. |
| 陈莹莹, 李捷, 周俗, 等. 高原鼠兔影响高寒草甸生态系统服务价值的评价方法. 草业科学, 2022, 39(1): 187-201. | |
| [23] | Yao Z Y, Li X Y, Dong Z B. The role and mechanism of rodent infestation in the desertification process of the Ruoergai Grassland. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(6): 1093-1101. |
| 姚正毅, 李晓英, 董治宝. 鼠害在若尔盖草原沙漠化进程中的作用与机理. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(6): 1093-1101. | |
| [24] | Li C. Response of vegetation and soil in alpine meadow and alpine steppe to the change of effective burrow density of plateau pika in Tibet. China. Lhasa: Tibet Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, 2023. |
| 李晨. 西藏高寒草甸及高寒草原植被及土壤对高原鼠兔有效洞穴密度变化的响应. 拉萨: 西藏农牧学院, 2023. | |
| [25] | Wang S L. Study on the response mechanism of dominant shrubs to grazing prohibition in degraded alpine shrub grasslands of the East Qilian Mountains. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2023. |
| 王世林. 东祁连山退化高寒灌丛草地优势灌木对禁牧的响应机制研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2023. | |
| [26] | Kan H M. The role and mechanism of plant bud bank and gap disturbance in grassland vegetation restoration. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. |
| 阚海明. 草地植被恢复中植物芽库和空斑干扰的作用机制研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015. | |
| [27] | Yang Y W, Li X L, Xie Y F. The growth characteristics and dynamic changes of population for Kobreisa pygmaea in stocking condition. Journal of Sichuan Grassland, 2005(8): 15-17. |
| 杨元武, 李希来, 解永发. 放牧条件下高山嵩草生长特性及其群落的变化动态. 四川草原, 2005(8): 15-17. |
| [1] | Jing-juan MA, Xi-lai LI, Tong-jiang YIN, Yu-ying BAO, Yu-fang ZHANG, Bei-qiao DING, Ying YUAN. Effects of recovery succession of degraded patches on soil water holding capacity in an alpine meadow [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 14-28. |
| [2] | Shuang YAN, Fei XIA, Wei WEI, Jing-long WANG, Hao-yang WU, Lin-ling RAN, Yun-yin XUE, Hao SHI, Shai-kun ZHENG, Jun-qiang WANG, Jun-dong HE. Differences along an erosion gradient in alpine meadow plant community diversity and factors influencing diversity [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 1-13. |
| [3] | Rui-bing WANG, Huan CHEN, Zhen-zhen PAN, Wei ZHAO, Shao-hao BANG, Xiao-long ZHOU, Zheng-wei REN. Mechanisms of species diversity loss in an alpine meadow community after adding different types and numbers of resources [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 1-11. |
| [4] | Jia-juan HUO, Ming-hua SONG. Changes in nitrogen uptake rate of plant species in different degradation stages of an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(2): 16-26. |
| [5] | Xiao-dong TU, Jun-fang CUI, Fu-hong KUANG, Chun-pei LI, Jiu-zhen DU, Hong-lan WANG, Xiang-yu TANG. Effects of conversion of alpine meadow to cultivated land on the soil microbial community in northwest Sichuan [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(2): 54-66. |
| [6] | Yang-yi-dan HE, Chang-ming CHEN, Xiao-xia HUANG, Guo-mei SHI, Ke-jian HE. A study of the relationship between plant functional traits and environmental factors in the alpine meadows of western Sichuan [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 28-39. |
| [7] | Xiang-jiao TAN, Kui-cai DONG, Hua ZHANG, Chuan-chuan TANG, Yan YANG. Effects of snow addition on soil phosphorus availability in an alpine meadow of the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(7): 205-214. |
| [8] | Rui-min QIN, Si-jia CHENG, Li MA, Zhong-hua ZHANG, Jing-jing WEI, Hong-ye SU, Zheng-chen SHI, Tao CHANG, Xue HU, De-ha-ze A, Fang YUAN, Shan LI, Hua-kun ZHOU. Effects of grazing exclusion and fertilization on alpine meadow community characteristics and vegetation carbon and nitrogen pools [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 1-11. |
| [9] | Zhi-yuan YOU, Shu-juan MA, Chang-ting WANG, Lu-ming DING, Xiao-yan SONG, Gao-fei YIN, Jun MAO. Using the model MaxEnt to predict plant distribution patterns of different functional groups in the alpine meadow ecosystem on Sichuan-Yunnan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 1-12. |
| [10] | Yuan MA, Xiao-li WANG, Yu-shou MA, De-gang ZHANG. Effects of the degree of alpine meadow degradation on the rhizosphere soil fungal community and the ecological network of dominant species [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(2): 125-137. |
| [11] | Ya-si FENG, Wen-ting JIANG, Yi-hong LIU, Yan WANG, Yuan LI, You-chao CHEN, Yan-jiang CAI. Effects of plowing and plant residue mulching on soil nitrous oxide emissions in a black soil beach-type degraded grassland [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(11): 15-29. |
| [12] | Lin-zhi LI, De-gang ZHANG, Yuan MA, Zhu-zhu LUO, Dong LIN, Long HAI, Lan-ge BAI. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil aggregates in alpine meadows with differing degrees of degradation [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 48-60. |
| [13] | Xiao-qin LIAO, Chang-ting WANG, Dan LIU, Guo TANG, Jun MAO. Effects of combined nitrogen and phosphorus application on root characteristics of alpine meadow [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 160-174. |
| [14] | Xin LU, Juan QI, Shang-li SHI, Mei-mei CHE, Xia LI, Shuang-shuang DU, Ning-gang SAI, Yan-wei JIA. Effects of broad-leaved grass inhibitors combined with nitrogen on soil characteristics of alpine meadow [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 38-48. |
| [15] | Cai-feng LIU, Yuan-yuan DUAN, Ling-ling WANG, Yi-mo WANG, Zheng-gang GUO. Effects of plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) disturbance on the relationship between plant species diversity and soil ecological stoichiometry in alpine meadows [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 157-166. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||