Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 84-96.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025360
Previous Articles Next Articles
De-feng HUANG1(
), Ke-ke LI1, Ke LAI2, Jie BAN2, Shuo WANG1, Bo-kang QI1, Xiao-wen ZHANG1, Zhi-qiang ZHONG1, Xiao-chen DENG1, Xian-jun YUAN1(
)
Received:2025-09-03
Revised:2025-10-16
Online:2026-08-20
Published:2026-06-22
Contact:
Xian-jun YUAN
De-feng HUANG, Ke-ke LI, Ke LAI, Jie BAN, Shuo WANG, Bo-kang QI, Xiao-wen ZHANG, Zhi-qiang ZHONG, Xiao-chen DENG, Xian-jun YUAN. Evaluation of yield, nutritional quality and silage quality of 18 oat varieties in Shigatse[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(8): 84-96.
| 品种Varieties | 来源Source |
|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 四川志和城锐农牧科技有限公司Sichuan Zhihe Chengrui Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 泰克Taike | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 甘肃农业大学/百思特草业有限公司Gansu Agricultural University/Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 悍马Hanma | 圣牧高科生态草业有限公司Shengmu Hi-tech Ecological Grass Co., Ltd. |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 北京佰青源畜牧业科技发展有限公司Beijing Baiqingyuan Animal Husbandry Technology Development Co., Ltd. |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 甘肃农业大学/百思特草业有限公司Gansu Agricultural University/Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 甘肃百斯特草种有限公司Gansu Best Seed Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 甘肃农业大学/百思特草业有限公司Gansu Agricultural University/Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 北京佰青源畜牧业科技发展有限公司Beijing Baiqingyuan Animal Husbandry Technology Development Co., Ltd. |
| 挑战者Challenger | 四川志和城锐农牧科技有限公司Sichuan Zhihe Chengrui Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 甘肃百斯特草种有限公司Gansu Best Seed Industry Co., Ltd. |
Table 1 Oat varieties and their sources for the trial
| 品种Varieties | 来源Source |
|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 四川志和城锐农牧科技有限公司Sichuan Zhihe Chengrui Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 泰克Taike | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 甘肃农业大学/百思特草业有限公司Gansu Agricultural University/Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 悍马Hanma | 圣牧高科生态草业有限公司Shengmu Hi-tech Ecological Grass Co., Ltd. |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 北京佰青源畜牧业科技发展有限公司Beijing Baiqingyuan Animal Husbandry Technology Development Co., Ltd. |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 甘肃农业大学/百思特草业有限公司Gansu Agricultural University/Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 甘肃百斯特草种有限公司Gansu Best Seed Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 甘肃农业大学/百思特草业有限公司Gansu Agricultural University/Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 北京百斯特草业有限公司Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 青海湟中天兴草业有限公司Qinghai Tianxing Grass Industry Co., Ltd. |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 北京佰青源畜牧业科技发展有限公司Beijing Baiqingyuan Animal Husbandry Technology Development Co., Ltd. |
| 挑战者Challenger | 四川志和城锐农牧科技有限公司Sichuan Zhihe Chengrui Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 甘肃百斯特草种有限公司Gansu Best Seed Industry Co., Ltd. |
品种 Variety | 旗叶长度 Flag leaf length (cm) | 旗叶宽度 Flag leaf width (cm) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 鲜草产量 Fresh grass yield (t·hm-2) | 干草产量 Hay yield (t·hm-2) | 叶茎比 Leaf-stem ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 23.19±1.83c | 1.52±0.05cde | 104.12±13.07cde | 4.12±0.28ef | 22.34±6.47cde | 8.73±2.03bc | 1.32±0.03a |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 15.37±0.48gh | 1.41±0.09ef | 135.16±10.78a | 4.41±0.06de | 27.64±9.27bcd | 10.94±2.39abc | 0.65±0.06f |
| 泰克Taike | 21.96±1.67cde | 1.49±0.11de | 114.84±2.20bcd | 4.59±0.20bcde | 27.43±3.33bcd | 11.39±1.27ab | 0.86±0.03cd |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 18.16±0.62fg | 1.78±0.08cd | 107.14±4.74cde | 4.45±0.10cde | 33.21±3.19ab | 9.09±1.10bc | 0.68±0.03ef |
| 悍马Hanma | 30.85±2.32ab | 2.62±0.16a | 127.08±6.87ab | 4.84±0.44abcd | 30.80±0.94abc | 10.66±0.41bc | 0.77±0.02def |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 22.74±1.06cd | 1.83±0.33c | 94.18±4.43ef | 4.82±0.21abcd | 25.55±1.45bcde | 10.19±1.73bc | 0.68±0.04ef |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 13.97±2.22h | 1.40±0.04ef | 98.60±20.17def | 4.76±0.49bcd | 25.72±11.63bcde | 8.65±3.03bc | 0.69±0.02ef |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 21.26±0.42cdef | 2.33±0.14b | 112.65±6.02bcd | 5.10±0.16ab | 28.91±3.01bc | 9.32±0.58bc | 0.62±0.02f |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 18.85±0.77ef | 1.58±0.12cde | 106.34±4.49cde | 3.66±0.19fg | 19.08±0.77de | 9.98±0.72bc | 1.30±0.16a |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 22.62±1.20cd | 1.52±0.19cde | 115.44±6.88bcd | 4.28±0.52de | 31.59±8.85abc | 10.37±0.72bc | 0.76±0.12def |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 22.64±1.31cd | 2.22±0.12b | 115.42±7.07bcd | 4.56±0.19bcde | 24.32±2.48bcde | 9.58±0.44bc | 0.65±0.01f |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 18.98±0.96ef | 1.51±0.09de | 121.03±5.19abc | 4.07±0.26efg | 26.71±1.67bcd | 11.16±0.68ab | 1.14±0.06b |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 19.34±2.16def | 1.13±0.16f | 83.73±3.67f | 3.58±0.25g | 16.91±3.04e | 8.25±2.39c | 0.93±0.24c |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 33.30±5.07a | 2.92±0.31a | 114.64±7.98bcd | 5.35±0.18a | 30.13±3.63bc | 10.07±1.18bc | 0.67±0.01f |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 19.63±1.03cdef | 1.43±0.09ef | 115.02±7.32bcd | 4.18±0.20ef | 29.43±2.72bc | 11.05±0.80ab | 0.82±0.06cde |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 22.54±1.03cd | 2.16±0.10b | 110.22±5.29bcde | 4.79±0.05bcd | 39.79±3.05a | 13.40±0.36a | 0.71±0.02def |
| 挑战者Challenger | 28.70±2.12b | 2.64±0.35a | 117.84±19.70bc | 5.02±0.60abc | 30.55±4.73abc | 10.20±0.21bc | 0.74±0.01def |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 29.79±1.73b | 2.65±0.15a | 116.24±4.44bcd | 4.59±0.09bcde | 33.78±1.99ab | 11.05±0.32ab | 0.62±0.03f |
Table 2 Comparison of agronomic traits and yield of tested oat varieties
品种 Variety | 旗叶长度 Flag leaf length (cm) | 旗叶宽度 Flag leaf width (cm) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 鲜草产量 Fresh grass yield (t·hm-2) | 干草产量 Hay yield (t·hm-2) | 叶茎比 Leaf-stem ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 23.19±1.83c | 1.52±0.05cde | 104.12±13.07cde | 4.12±0.28ef | 22.34±6.47cde | 8.73±2.03bc | 1.32±0.03a |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 15.37±0.48gh | 1.41±0.09ef | 135.16±10.78a | 4.41±0.06de | 27.64±9.27bcd | 10.94±2.39abc | 0.65±0.06f |
| 泰克Taike | 21.96±1.67cde | 1.49±0.11de | 114.84±2.20bcd | 4.59±0.20bcde | 27.43±3.33bcd | 11.39±1.27ab | 0.86±0.03cd |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 18.16±0.62fg | 1.78±0.08cd | 107.14±4.74cde | 4.45±0.10cde | 33.21±3.19ab | 9.09±1.10bc | 0.68±0.03ef |
| 悍马Hanma | 30.85±2.32ab | 2.62±0.16a | 127.08±6.87ab | 4.84±0.44abcd | 30.80±0.94abc | 10.66±0.41bc | 0.77±0.02def |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 22.74±1.06cd | 1.83±0.33c | 94.18±4.43ef | 4.82±0.21abcd | 25.55±1.45bcde | 10.19±1.73bc | 0.68±0.04ef |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 13.97±2.22h | 1.40±0.04ef | 98.60±20.17def | 4.76±0.49bcd | 25.72±11.63bcde | 8.65±3.03bc | 0.69±0.02ef |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 21.26±0.42cdef | 2.33±0.14b | 112.65±6.02bcd | 5.10±0.16ab | 28.91±3.01bc | 9.32±0.58bc | 0.62±0.02f |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 18.85±0.77ef | 1.58±0.12cde | 106.34±4.49cde | 3.66±0.19fg | 19.08±0.77de | 9.98±0.72bc | 1.30±0.16a |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 22.62±1.20cd | 1.52±0.19cde | 115.44±6.88bcd | 4.28±0.52de | 31.59±8.85abc | 10.37±0.72bc | 0.76±0.12def |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 22.64±1.31cd | 2.22±0.12b | 115.42±7.07bcd | 4.56±0.19bcde | 24.32±2.48bcde | 9.58±0.44bc | 0.65±0.01f |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 18.98±0.96ef | 1.51±0.09de | 121.03±5.19abc | 4.07±0.26efg | 26.71±1.67bcd | 11.16±0.68ab | 1.14±0.06b |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 19.34±2.16def | 1.13±0.16f | 83.73±3.67f | 3.58±0.25g | 16.91±3.04e | 8.25±2.39c | 0.93±0.24c |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 33.30±5.07a | 2.92±0.31a | 114.64±7.98bcd | 5.35±0.18a | 30.13±3.63bc | 10.07±1.18bc | 0.67±0.01f |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 19.63±1.03cdef | 1.43±0.09ef | 115.02±7.32bcd | 4.18±0.20ef | 29.43±2.72bc | 11.05±0.80ab | 0.82±0.06cde |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 22.54±1.03cd | 2.16±0.10b | 110.22±5.29bcde | 4.79±0.05bcd | 39.79±3.05a | 13.40±0.36a | 0.71±0.02def |
| 挑战者Challenger | 28.70±2.12b | 2.64±0.35a | 117.84±19.70bc | 5.02±0.60abc | 30.55±4.73abc | 10.20±0.21bc | 0.74±0.01def |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 29.79±1.73b | 2.65±0.15a | 116.24±4.44bcd | 4.59±0.09bcde | 33.78±1.99ab | 11.05±0.32ab | 0.62±0.03f |
品种 Varieties | 干物质 DM (%FW) | 水溶性碳水化合物 WSC (%DM) | 粗蛋白 CP (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 NDF (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 ADF (%DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 34.73±2.14def | 14.97±0.62ghi | 8.93±0.15bcdef | 48.45±2.70de | 25.10±2.99gh |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 29.45±0.70h | 14.14±0.72hi | 8.74±0.68cdef | 58.94±1.60a | 35.03±1.41a |
| 泰克Taike | 34.99±0.49cdef | 17.61±1.99defg | 12.17±0.40a | 49.20±1.89cde | 26.36±1.37fgh |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 35.83±1.99bcde | 20.29±3.18bcd | 6.85±1.30hi | 55.50±1.70abc | 33.15±0.26abc |
| 悍马Hanma | 37.50±0.60ab | 16.83±2.43efgh | 9.83±0.78bc | 55.19±0.09abcd | 29.60±0.37cdef |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 39.67±0.47a | 12.77±0.27i | 9.21±0.13bcdef | 50.63±3.26cde | 26.15±0.78fgh |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 32.05±0.54g | 23.08±1.97a | 7.40±0.19gh | 54.28±2.24abcd | 31.70±2.00abc |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 33.15±1.04fg | 21.58±1.41ab | 8.39±0.25efg | 49.27±7.38cde | 24.07±2.09h |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 31.81±1.01g | 19.12±1.31bcdef | 6.15±0.70i | 54.87±4.22abcd | 33.06±3.39abc |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 35.58±0.34bcde | 18.77±1.70cdef | 8.54±0.23defg | 50.09±5.40cde | 27.68±2.86defgh |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 36.23±0.34bcd | 14.08±1.29hi | 8.52±0.75defg | 58.15±0.33ab | 34.40±0.29ab |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 37.78±1.14ab | 16.45±0.03fgh | 8.30±1.52fg | 48.95±1.58cde | 28.01±0.65defg |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 37.06±1.52bc | 21.37±2.20abc | 8.78±0.53bcdef | 51.38±2.87cde | 27.36±2.16efgh |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 34.63±1.46def | 15.11±0.72ghi | 9.31±0.36bcdef | 52.22±4.57bcde | 30.36±3.00cde |
| 青引1号 Qingyin No.1 | 35.73±1.43bcde | 19.61±0.20bcde | 8.57±0.39cdefg | 50.13±4.09cde | 27.94±1.91defg |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 33.85±0.22efg | 20.36±0.54abcd | 10.03±0.44ab | 54.70±3.41abcd | 31.20±2.33bcd |
| 挑战者Challenger | 37.56±2.40ab | 17.88±0.06def | 9.76±0.72bcd | 51.12±3.56cde | 27.79±1.19defg |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 37.64±0.39ab | 17.60±0.74defg | 9.60±0.48bcde | 46.34±2.30e | 24.75±1.45gh |
Table 3 Comparison of nutritional values of different oat varieties before ensiling
品种 Varieties | 干物质 DM (%FW) | 水溶性碳水化合物 WSC (%DM) | 粗蛋白 CP (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 NDF (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 ADF (%DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 34.73±2.14def | 14.97±0.62ghi | 8.93±0.15bcdef | 48.45±2.70de | 25.10±2.99gh |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 29.45±0.70h | 14.14±0.72hi | 8.74±0.68cdef | 58.94±1.60a | 35.03±1.41a |
| 泰克Taike | 34.99±0.49cdef | 17.61±1.99defg | 12.17±0.40a | 49.20±1.89cde | 26.36±1.37fgh |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 35.83±1.99bcde | 20.29±3.18bcd | 6.85±1.30hi | 55.50±1.70abc | 33.15±0.26abc |
| 悍马Hanma | 37.50±0.60ab | 16.83±2.43efgh | 9.83±0.78bc | 55.19±0.09abcd | 29.60±0.37cdef |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 39.67±0.47a | 12.77±0.27i | 9.21±0.13bcdef | 50.63±3.26cde | 26.15±0.78fgh |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 32.05±0.54g | 23.08±1.97a | 7.40±0.19gh | 54.28±2.24abcd | 31.70±2.00abc |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 33.15±1.04fg | 21.58±1.41ab | 8.39±0.25efg | 49.27±7.38cde | 24.07±2.09h |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 31.81±1.01g | 19.12±1.31bcdef | 6.15±0.70i | 54.87±4.22abcd | 33.06±3.39abc |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 35.58±0.34bcde | 18.77±1.70cdef | 8.54±0.23defg | 50.09±5.40cde | 27.68±2.86defgh |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 36.23±0.34bcd | 14.08±1.29hi | 8.52±0.75defg | 58.15±0.33ab | 34.40±0.29ab |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 37.78±1.14ab | 16.45±0.03fgh | 8.30±1.52fg | 48.95±1.58cde | 28.01±0.65defg |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 37.06±1.52bc | 21.37±2.20abc | 8.78±0.53bcdef | 51.38±2.87cde | 27.36±2.16efgh |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 34.63±1.46def | 15.11±0.72ghi | 9.31±0.36bcdef | 52.22±4.57bcde | 30.36±3.00cde |
| 青引1号 Qingyin No.1 | 35.73±1.43bcde | 19.61±0.20bcde | 8.57±0.39cdefg | 50.13±4.09cde | 27.94±1.91defg |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 33.85±0.22efg | 20.36±0.54abcd | 10.03±0.44ab | 54.70±3.41abcd | 31.20±2.33bcd |
| 挑战者Challenger | 37.56±2.40ab | 17.88±0.06def | 9.76±0.72bcd | 51.12±3.56cde | 27.79±1.19defg |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 37.64±0.39ab | 17.60±0.74defg | 9.60±0.48bcde | 46.34±2.30e | 24.75±1.45gh |
品种 Variety | 干物质 DM (%FW) | 水溶性碳水化合物 WSC (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 NDF (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 ADF (%DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 32.42±0.63defg | 3.23±0.32b | 53.87±2.19e | 30.99±1.51hi |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 28.12±0.73i | 1.10±0.11gh | 66.37±2.41a | 39.51±1.24ab |
| 泰克Taike | 30.57±1.19gh | 1.82±0.28e | 56.11±3.77de | 33.19±2.20efgh |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 32.93±1.20cdef | 1.57±0.23ef | 63.12±3.21ab | 37.50±1.50bcd |
| 悍马Hanma | 31.45±1.42fg | 2.20±0.30d | 62.09±1.59abc | 35.83±1.42cdef |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 38.96±1.01a | 3.66±0.43a | 49.79±1.37f | 29.11±0.91i |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 28.54±1.07hi | 1.42±0.16fg | 64.13±0.87ab | 37.78±1.09abcd |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 32.00±1.34defg | 1.54±0.26ef | 63.92±2.76ab | 37.43±2.32bcd |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 29.08±0.69hi | 1.05±0.10gh | 66.04±2.39a | 40.97±2.22a |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 33.05±0.88cdef | 0.84±0.06h | 59.76±1.33bcd | 35.53±0.71cdef |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 34.13±1.52bcd | 1.32±0.21fg | 62.92±3.06ab | 37.55±2.55bcd |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 33.07±1.73cdef | 2.81±0.33c | 59.82±2.25bcd | 36.08±1.88cde |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 33.99±0.83bcde | 1.27±0.18fg | 58.11±2.40cd | 32.46±1.48gh |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 32.30±1.02defg | 1.37±0.04fg | 65.70±3.27a | 38.25±1.53abc |
| 青引1号 Qingyin No.1 | 35.51±4.05ab | 1.60±0.21ef | 58.30±4.58cd | 33.33±3.76efgh |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 31.74±0.91efg | 1.85±0.23e | 63.02±3.93ab | 35.00±1.98defg |
| 挑战者Challenger | 33.42±0.90bcdef | 2.30±0.31d | 60.18±2.96bcd | 34.00±1.51efgh |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 35.03±0.51bc | 2.37±0.23d | 57.69±1.82cde | 32.83±1.67fgh |
Table 4 Comparison of nutritional components in silage of different oat varieties
品种 Variety | 干物质 DM (%FW) | 水溶性碳水化合物 WSC (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 NDF (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 ADF (%DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 32.42±0.63defg | 3.23±0.32b | 53.87±2.19e | 30.99±1.51hi |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 28.12±0.73i | 1.10±0.11gh | 66.37±2.41a | 39.51±1.24ab |
| 泰克Taike | 30.57±1.19gh | 1.82±0.28e | 56.11±3.77de | 33.19±2.20efgh |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 32.93±1.20cdef | 1.57±0.23ef | 63.12±3.21ab | 37.50±1.50bcd |
| 悍马Hanma | 31.45±1.42fg | 2.20±0.30d | 62.09±1.59abc | 35.83±1.42cdef |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 38.96±1.01a | 3.66±0.43a | 49.79±1.37f | 29.11±0.91i |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 28.54±1.07hi | 1.42±0.16fg | 64.13±0.87ab | 37.78±1.09abcd |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 32.00±1.34defg | 1.54±0.26ef | 63.92±2.76ab | 37.43±2.32bcd |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 29.08±0.69hi | 1.05±0.10gh | 66.04±2.39a | 40.97±2.22a |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 33.05±0.88cdef | 0.84±0.06h | 59.76±1.33bcd | 35.53±0.71cdef |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 34.13±1.52bcd | 1.32±0.21fg | 62.92±3.06ab | 37.55±2.55bcd |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 33.07±1.73cdef | 2.81±0.33c | 59.82±2.25bcd | 36.08±1.88cde |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 33.99±0.83bcde | 1.27±0.18fg | 58.11±2.40cd | 32.46±1.48gh |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 32.30±1.02defg | 1.37±0.04fg | 65.70±3.27a | 38.25±1.53abc |
| 青引1号 Qingyin No.1 | 35.51±4.05ab | 1.60±0.21ef | 58.30±4.58cd | 33.33±3.76efgh |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 31.74±0.91efg | 1.85±0.23e | 63.02±3.93ab | 35.00±1.98defg |
| 挑战者Challenger | 33.42±0.90bcdef | 2.30±0.31d | 60.18±2.96bcd | 34.00±1.51efgh |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 35.03±0.51bc | 2.37±0.23d | 57.69±1.82cde | 32.83±1.67fgh |
| 品种Variety | pH | 乳酸LA (%DM) | 乙酸AA (%DM) | 乳乙比LA/AA | 丁酸BA (%DM) | 氨态氮AN (%TN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 4.02±0.08c | 6.77±0.36abc | 0.62±0.07d | 11.06±1.13ab | 1.07±0.21ab | 5.65±0.49bcde |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 4.59±0.39a | 4.84±1.88cdef | 0.80±0.55cd | 7.04±2.21bcd | 1.56±1.14a | 6.59±1.03ab |
| 泰克Taike | 4.18±0.10bc | 7.89±0.98a | 1.45±0.30abcd | 5.53±0.66bcd | 0.03±0.01c | 6.52±0.79ab |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 4.14±0.02bc | 5.23±0.32bcdef | 0.63±0.09d | 8.39±0.98bcd | 0.05±0.05c | 5.69±0.95bcd |
| 悍马Hanma | 4.18±0.13bc | 4.11±2.83ef | 1.94±1.27ab | 4.08±4.04cd | 0.06±0.05c | 4.17±0.26g |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 4.09±0.08bc | 5.28±0.44bcdef | 0.68±0.25cd | 9.23±5.32abc | 0.61±0.46bc | 4.20±0.11g |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 4.01±0.04c | 7.82±0.97a | 1.71±0.78abc | 5.24±2.14bcd | 0.24±0.39c | 6.07±0.86bc |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 4.08±0.10bc | 5.68±1.90bcde | 1.61±0.91abcd | 5.26±4.14bcd | 0.12±0.13c | 7.46±1.16a |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 4.18±0.11bc | 6.00±1.10abcde | 0.92±0.18bcd | 6.61±1.29bcd | 0.55±0.57bc | 6.29±0.30bc |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 4.14±0.05bc | 4.87±0.49cdef | 1.10±0.22bcd | 4.57±1.10cd | 0.10±0.11c | 4.25±0.54fg |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 4.23±0.09bc | 6.04±1.04abcde | 0.75±0.24cd | 8.59±3.02bcd | 0.06±0.07c | 4.20±0.72g |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 4.29±0.07b | 5.30±0.69bcdef | 1.00±0.19bcd | 5.50±1.50bcd | 0.54±0.60bc | 6.04±0.89bc |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 4.14±0.21bc | 3.35±1.47f | 2.13±1.33a | 2.87±3.29d | 0.30±0.55c | 5.23±0.78cdefg |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 4.27±0.08b | 4.55±1.56def | 1.47±0.91abcd | 4.45±3.70cd | 0.18±0.17c | 5.31±0.53cdef |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 4.14±0.07bc | 5.38±0.55bcdef | 0.74±0.28cd | 7.77±1.88bcd | 0.15±0.24c | 4.61±0.33defg |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 4.18±0.06bc | 7.18±1.56ab | 0.59±0.27d | 14.30±6.55a | 0.28±0.28c | 4.58±0.63efg |
| 挑战者Challenger | 4.17±0.04bc | 6.61±0.55abcd | 1.13±0.44abcd | 6.36±1.92bcd | 0.04±0.00c | 4.77±0.29defg |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 4.25±0.03b | 6.44±0.66abcd | 0.88±0.65cd | 11.10±8.21ab | 0.16±0.30c | 5.51±0.24bcde |
Table 5 The fermentation profiles of oat silages among varieties
| 品种Variety | pH | 乳酸LA (%DM) | 乙酸AA (%DM) | 乳乙比LA/AA | 丁酸BA (%DM) | 氨态氮AN (%TN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 4.02±0.08c | 6.77±0.36abc | 0.62±0.07d | 11.06±1.13ab | 1.07±0.21ab | 5.65±0.49bcde |
| 英迪米特Indimite | 4.59±0.39a | 4.84±1.88cdef | 0.80±0.55cd | 7.04±2.21bcd | 1.56±1.14a | 6.59±1.03ab |
| 泰克Taike | 4.18±0.10bc | 7.89±0.98a | 1.45±0.30abcd | 5.53±0.66bcd | 0.03±0.01c | 6.52±0.79ab |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | 4.14±0.02bc | 5.23±0.32bcdef | 0.63±0.09d | 8.39±0.98bcd | 0.05±0.05c | 5.69±0.95bcd |
| 悍马Hanma | 4.18±0.13bc | 4.11±2.83ef | 1.94±1.27ab | 4.08±4.04cd | 0.06±0.05c | 4.17±0.26g |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 4.09±0.08bc | 5.28±0.44bcdef | 0.68±0.25cd | 9.23±5.32abc | 0.61±0.46bc | 4.20±0.11g |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | 4.01±0.04c | 7.82±0.97a | 1.71±0.78abc | 5.24±2.14bcd | 0.24±0.39c | 6.07±0.86bc |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | 4.08±0.10bc | 5.68±1.90bcde | 1.61±0.91abcd | 5.26±4.14bcd | 0.12±0.13c | 7.46±1.16a |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | 4.18±0.11bc | 6.00±1.10abcde | 0.92±0.18bcd | 6.61±1.29bcd | 0.55±0.57bc | 6.29±0.30bc |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 4.14±0.05bc | 4.87±0.49cdef | 1.10±0.22bcd | 4.57±1.10cd | 0.10±0.11c | 4.25±0.54fg |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | 4.23±0.09bc | 6.04±1.04abcde | 0.75±0.24cd | 8.59±3.02bcd | 0.06±0.07c | 4.20±0.72g |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 4.29±0.07b | 5.30±0.69bcdef | 1.00±0.19bcd | 5.50±1.50bcd | 0.54±0.60bc | 6.04±0.89bc |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 4.14±0.21bc | 3.35±1.47f | 2.13±1.33a | 2.87±3.29d | 0.30±0.55c | 5.23±0.78cdefg |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | 4.27±0.08b | 4.55±1.56def | 1.47±0.91abcd | 4.45±3.70cd | 0.18±0.17c | 5.31±0.53cdef |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 4.14±0.07bc | 5.38±0.55bcdef | 0.74±0.28cd | 7.77±1.88bcd | 0.15±0.24c | 4.61±0.33defg |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 4.18±0.06bc | 7.18±1.56ab | 0.59±0.27d | 14.30±6.55a | 0.28±0.28c | 4.58±0.63efg |
| 挑战者Challenger | 4.17±0.04bc | 6.61±0.55abcd | 1.13±0.44abcd | 6.36±1.92bcd | 0.04±0.00c | 4.77±0.29defg |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 4.25±0.03b | 6.44±0.66abcd | 0.88±0.65cd | 11.10±8.21ab | 0.16±0.30c | 5.51±0.24bcde |
主成分 Principal component | 特征根 Eigenvalues | 方差贡献率 VCR (%) | 累计方差贡献率 Cumulative VCR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.558 | 42.755 | 42.755 |
| 2 | 1.926 | 14.815 | 57.570 |
| 3 | 1.815 | 13.963 | 71.533 |
| 4 | 1.464 | 11.259 | 82.792 |
Table 6 Principal component eigenvalues and variance contribution rates (VCR) of oat indicators
主成分 Principal component | 特征根 Eigenvalues | 方差贡献率 VCR (%) | 累计方差贡献率 Cumulative VCR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.558 | 42.755 | 42.755 |
| 2 | 1.926 | 14.815 | 57.570 |
| 3 | 1.815 | 13.963 | 71.533 |
| 4 | 1.464 | 11.259 | 82.792 |
评价指标 Evaluation indicator | 主成分Principal component | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
| 干草产量Hay yield | 0.102 | 0.764 | 0.357 | 0.026 |
| 叶茎比Leaf-stem ratio | 0.071 | -0.649 | 0.425 | -0.023 |
| 干物质Dry matter | 0.767 | 0.033 | -0.436 | -0.285 |
| 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 0.960 | -0.175 | 0.083 | -0.051 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 0.974 | -0.039 | 0.014 | -0.027 |
| 水溶性碳水化合物WSC | 0.771 | -0.181 | 0.277 | -0.073 |
| 粗蛋白Crude protein | 0.541 | 0.635 | 0.278 | 0.175 |
| 相对饲喂价值RFV | 0.971 | -0.145 | 0.079 | -0.068 |
| 饲草分级指数FGI | 0.927 | 0.141 | 0.189 | 0.060 |
| 酸碱度pH | 0.412 | -0.505 | -0.418 | 0.569 |
| 乳酸Lactic acid | 0.112 | 0.052 | 0.397 | 0.813 |
| 丁酸Butyric acid | 0.109 | 0.269 | -0.712 | 0.529 |
| 氨态氮AN | 0.448 | 0.286 | -0.524 | -0.263 |
Table 7 Factor loadings of various indicators of oats based on principal component analysis
评价指标 Evaluation indicator | 主成分Principal component | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
| 干草产量Hay yield | 0.102 | 0.764 | 0.357 | 0.026 |
| 叶茎比Leaf-stem ratio | 0.071 | -0.649 | 0.425 | -0.023 |
| 干物质Dry matter | 0.767 | 0.033 | -0.436 | -0.285 |
| 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 0.960 | -0.175 | 0.083 | -0.051 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 0.974 | -0.039 | 0.014 | -0.027 |
| 水溶性碳水化合物WSC | 0.771 | -0.181 | 0.277 | -0.073 |
| 粗蛋白Crude protein | 0.541 | 0.635 | 0.278 | 0.175 |
| 相对饲喂价值RFV | 0.971 | -0.145 | 0.079 | -0.068 |
| 饲草分级指数FGI | 0.927 | 0.141 | 0.189 | 0.060 |
| 酸碱度pH | 0.412 | -0.505 | -0.418 | 0.569 |
| 乳酸Lactic acid | 0.112 | 0.052 | 0.397 | 0.813 |
| 丁酸Butyric acid | 0.109 | 0.269 | -0.712 | 0.529 |
| 氨态氮AN | 0.448 | 0.286 | -0.524 | -0.263 |
品种 Varieties | 主成分分析PCA | 灰色关联度GRA | TOPSIS | 平均Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS | R | GRG | R | RFD | R | 得分Score | R | |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 2.50269 | 1 | 0.96211 | 14 | 0.54498 | 3 | 1.33659 | 1 |
| 泰克Taike | 2.02336 | 2 | 0.99227 | 1 | 0.50101 | 4 | 1.17221 | 2 |
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 1.38214 | 3 | 0.94956 | 17 | 0.72322 | 1 | 1.01831 | 3 |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 1.12181 | 4 | 0.97959 | 8 | 0.38780 | 8 | 0.82973 | 4 |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 0.77354 | 5 | 0.97221 | 11 | 0.36398 | 10 | 0.70325 | 5 |
| 挑战者Challenger | 0.72856 | 6 | 0.99077 | 2 | 0.38676 | 9 | 0.70203 | 7 |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 0.68614 | 7 | 0.98086 | 7 | 0.43971 | 6 | 0.70224 | 6 |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 0.02381 | 8 | 0.95923 | 15 | 0.56195 | 2 | 0.51500 | 8 |
| 悍马Hanma | -0.07294 | 9 | 0.98712 | 3 | 0.34453 | 11 | 0.41957 | 9 |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | -0.14810 | 10 | 0.96868 | 13 | 0.43092 | 7 | 0.41717 | 10 |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | -0.39070 | 11 | 0.98195 | 6 | 0.31968 | 12 | 0.30365 | 11 |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | -0.54000 | 12 | 0.98532 | 4 | 0.26849 | 13 | 0.23794 | 12 |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | -0.93558 | 13 | 0.97741 | 9 | 0.20602 | 17 | 0.08261 | 13 |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | -0.98018 | 14 | 0.97431 | 10 | 0.21447 | 16 | 0.06953 | 14 |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | -1.19144 | 15 | 0.98429 | 5 | 0.22832 | 14 | 0.00706 | 15 |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | -1.20344 | 16 | 0.96989 | 12 | 0.22494 | 15 | -0.00287 | 16 |
| 英迪米特Indimite | -1.62560 | 17 | 0.93270 | 18 | 0.15262 | 18 | -0.18009 | 17 |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | -2.15407 | 18 | 0.95447 | 16 | 0.46878 | 5 | -0.24361 | 18 |
Table 8 Comprehensive ranking based on three evaluation methods
品种 Varieties | 主成分分析PCA | 灰色关联度GRA | TOPSIS | 平均Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS | R | GRG | R | RFD | R | 得分Score | R | |
| 前锋Qianfeng | 2.50269 | 1 | 0.96211 | 14 | 0.54498 | 3 | 1.33659 | 1 |
| 泰克Taike | 2.02336 | 2 | 0.99227 | 1 | 0.50101 | 4 | 1.17221 | 2 |
| 优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 1.38214 | 3 | 0.94956 | 17 | 0.72322 | 1 | 1.01831 | 3 |
| 定燕2号Dingyan No.2 | 1.12181 | 4 | 0.97959 | 8 | 0.38780 | 8 | 0.82973 | 4 |
| 甜燕75 Tianyan 75 | 0.77354 | 5 | 0.97221 | 11 | 0.36398 | 10 | 0.70325 | 5 |
| 挑战者Challenger | 0.72856 | 6 | 0.99077 | 2 | 0.38676 | 9 | 0.70203 | 7 |
| 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 0.68614 | 7 | 0.98086 | 7 | 0.43971 | 6 | 0.70224 | 6 |
| 歌莉娅Gloria | 0.02381 | 8 | 0.95923 | 15 | 0.56195 | 2 | 0.51500 | 8 |
| 悍马Hanma | -0.07294 | 9 | 0.98712 | 3 | 0.34453 | 11 | 0.41957 | 9 |
| 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | -0.14810 | 10 | 0.96868 | 13 | 0.43092 | 7 | 0.41717 | 10 |
| 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | -0.39070 | 11 | 0.98195 | 6 | 0.31968 | 12 | 0.30365 | 11 |
| 陇燕3号Longyan No.3 | -0.54000 | 12 | 0.98532 | 4 | 0.26849 | 13 | 0.23794 | 12 |
| 高燕17 Gaoyan 17 | -0.93558 | 13 | 0.97741 | 9 | 0.20602 | 17 | 0.08261 | 13 |
| 高燕16 Gaoyan 16 | -0.98018 | 14 | 0.97431 | 10 | 0.21447 | 16 | 0.06953 | 14 |
| 陇燕5号Longyan No.5 | -1.19144 | 15 | 0.98429 | 5 | 0.22832 | 14 | 0.00706 | 15 |
| 甜燕2+Tianyan 2+ | -1.20344 | 16 | 0.96989 | 12 | 0.22494 | 15 | -0.00287 | 16 |
| 英迪米特Indimite | -1.62560 | 17 | 0.93270 | 18 | 0.15262 | 18 | -0.18009 | 17 |
| 陇燕4号Longyan No.4 | -2.15407 | 18 | 0.95447 | 16 | 0.46878 | 5 | -0.24361 | 18 |
| [1] | Wang Y, Yuan X J, Guo G, et al. Study on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of total mixed rations with different forages in Tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(6): 95-102. |
| 王勇, 原现军, 郭刚, 等. 西藏不同饲草全混合日粮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的研究. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 95-102. | |
| [2] | Shi R Z, Renzengwangdui, Pian duo, et al. Adaptability evaluation of four oat cultivars in Shenzha County, Naqu, Tibet. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(2): 49-54. |
| 史睿智, 仁增旺堆, 片多, 等. 4个燕麦品种在西藏那曲申扎县的适应性评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(2): 49-54. | |
| [3] | Li R, Zhang Z X, Tang W, et al. Common vetch cultivars improve yield of oat row intercropping on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau by optimizing photosynthetic performance. European Journal of Agronomy, 2020, 117: 126088. |
| [4] | Luo F, Liu W H, Mi W B, et al. Legume-grass mixtures increase forage yield by improving soil quality in different ecological regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1280771. |
| [5] | Cui X X, Hou F J, Chang S H, et al. Comparison of yield and quality of two oat cultivars in alpine pastoral areas. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(6): 1489-1495. |
| 崔雄雄, 侯扶江, 常生华, 等. 高寒牧区两个燕麦品种的产量与品质比较. 草业科学, 2018, 35(6): 1489-1495. | |
| [6] | Zhang G Y, Wang J W, Zhang H R, et al. Comparative study on production performance and nutritional quality of eight imported oat varieties in the Shigatse region of Tibet, China. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125, 1920. |
| 张光雨, 王江伟, 张豪睿, 等. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较. 草业科学, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125, 1920. | |
| [7] | Ma G L, Shi H M, Ma J Q, et al. Experiments on the cultivation of oat varieties in the alpine area of Gannan. Chinese Cattle Science, 2024, 50(4): 35-38. |
| 马桂琳, 石红梅, 马俊清, 等. 不同燕麦品种在甘南高寒地区种植试验. 中国牛业科学, 2024, 50(4): 35-38. | |
| [8] | Wu H Y, Qu N, Qu Z, et al. Comparison of crop yield and forage quality of six oat varieties in Angren County, Shigatse. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. |
| 吴海艳, 曲尼, 曲珍, 等. 6个燕麦品种在昂仁县的生产性能及饲草品质比较. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. | |
| [9] | Wei K T, Zhang C P, Yu Y, et al. Yield performance, nutritional quality, and soil physicochemical responses of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars in the Qinghai Lake-Gonghe Basin region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 107-118. |
| 魏孔涛, 张春平, 俞旸, 等. 环青海湖共和盆地不同燕麦品种的产量、营养价值及对土壤理化性质的影响. 草业学报, 2026, 35(1): 107-118. | |
| [10] | Guan H, Xu D, Li H P, et al. A study of nutritional quality and rumen degradation characteristics of 17 oat varieties in high cold regions. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 185-198. |
| 关皓, 许多, 李海萍, 等. 高寒地区17个燕麦品种营养品质及瘤胃降解特性研究. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 185-198. | |
| [11] | Ma B L, Zheng Z, Pageau D, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, yield and agronomic traits of oat cultivars as affected by fertilizer N rates under diverse environments. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2017, 108(3): 245-265. |
| [12] | Madrid J, Martínez-Teruel A, Hernández F, et al. A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1999, 79(12): 1722-1726. |
| [13] | Zhang H F, Zhang S P. Comparative study on determination of protein content in feed by biuret method and Kjeldahl determination. China Feed, 2008(7): 34-35, 38. |
| 张厚锋, 张淑萍. 双缩脲法和凯氏定氮法测定饲料中蛋白质含量的比较研究. 中国饲料, 2008(7): 34-35, 38. | |
| [14] | Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10): 3583-3597. |
| [15] | Murphy R. A method for the extraction of plant samples and the determination of total soluble carbohydrates. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1958, 9(11): 714-717. |
| [16] | Chen W, Xia J H. An optimal weights combination method considering both subjective and objective weight information. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2007, 37(1): 17-22. |
| 陈伟, 夏建华. 综合主、客观权重信息的最优组合赋权方法. 数学的实践与认识, 2007, 37(1): 17-22. | |
| [17] | Wei M Y, Wang M S, Jiang W G, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of twelve kiwifruit (Actinidia) varieties on the winemaking adaptability based on multi-criteria decision-making method. Food Chemistry, 2025, 477: 143512. |
| [18] | Bilal M, Ayub M, Tariq M, et al. Dry matter yield and forage quality traits of oat (Avena sativa L.) under integrative use of microbial and synthetic source of nitrogen. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 16(3): 236-241. |
| [19] | Ju Z L, Zhao G Q, Chai J K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value and silage fermentation quality of different oat varieties in central Gansu Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 77-86. |
| 琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 不同燕麦品种在甘肃中部的营养价值及青贮发酵品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 77-86. | |
| [20] | Bao W L, Ren J H, Zhang T W, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of productivity of 12 forage oat varieties in Ulanqab. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176. |
| 包文龙, 任家辉, 张腾薇, 等. 12个饲用燕麦品种在乌兰察布生产力的综合评价. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176. | |
| [21] | Yang H L, Xu C L, Yu X J, et al. Comparative study on the performance of 14 oat (Avena sativa) germplasm in Huangcheng Town of Sunan County, Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1): 129-135. |
| 杨海磊, 徐长林, 鱼小军, 等. 14份燕麦种质在肃南皇城镇的生产性能比较. 草业科学, 2016, 33(1): 129-135. | |
| [22] | Zhou Q L. Test of 16 oat introduced varieties in alpine pastoral region of Tibet. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(1): 33-34. |
| 周启龙. 16个燕麦品种在西藏高寒牧区的引种试验. 现代农业科技, 2020(1): 33-34. | |
| [23] | Li H F, Zhou B W, Zhang M, et al. Adaptability evaluation of different oat varieties introduced in the Hulunbuir region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. |
| 李鸿飞, 周帮伟, 张淼, 等. 不同燕麦品种在呼伦贝尔地区的引种适应性评价. 草业学报, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. | |
| [24] | Geng X L, Han T H, Zhang S P, et al. Adaptability evaluation of 30 oat germplasm in Tianzhu. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1743-1750. |
| 耿小丽, 韩天虎, 张少平, 等. 30个燕麦品种(品系)在甘肃天祝地区的适应性评价. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1743-1750. | |
| [25] | Shi J J, Xue Y W, Guo W, et al. Evaluation of forage yield and nutritional value of introduced oat germplasm resources. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(9): 1009-1071. |
| 史京京, 薛盈文, 郭伟, 等. 引进燕麦种质资源饲草产量与饲用营养价值评价. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(9): 1009-1071. | |
| [26] | Li X L, Zhang X Y, Tang Y G, et al. Effect of concentrate to forage ratio in diet on weight gain of housed goats. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(2): 85-91. |
| 李向林, 张新跃, 唐一国, 等. 日粮中精料和牧草比例对舍饲山羊增重的影响. 草业学报, 2008, 17(2): 85-91. | |
| [27] | Huang Y, Liang L F, Dai S, et al. Effect of different regions and ensiling periods on fermentation quality and the bacterial community of whole-plant maize silage. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12: 743695. |
| [28] | Cherney D J R, Cherney J H, Cox W J. Fermentation characteristics of corn forage ensiled in mini-silos. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87(12): 4238-4246. |
| [29] | Jia C W, Yuan X J, Li J F, et al. Effect of adding wet hulless barley distillers’ grains on fermentation quality of mixed ensilage of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016, 39(2): 275-280. |
| 贾春旺, 原现军, 李君风, 等. 青稞酒糟对紫花苜蓿和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(2): 275-280. | |
| [30] | Kaiser E, Weib K, Krause R. Criterions to judge fermentation quality of grass silages. Proceedings of the Society for Nutritional Physiology, 2000(9): 94-101. |
| [31] | Zhang Y G, Zi X J, Li M, et al. Effect of organic acids on silage quality and nutritional components of Stylosanthes guianensis. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016, 28(5): 1609-1614. |
| 张亚格, 字学娟, 李茂, 等. 有机酸对柱花草青贮品质和营养成分的影响. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(5): 1609-1614. | |
| [32] | Sofía S, Enrique D J, Luis R J, et al. Growth stage and ensiling: Impact on chemical composition, conservation quality, and in situ ruminal degradability of whole-crop oat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2021, 102(7): 2783-2791. |
| [33] | Li X M. Review of multi-index comprehensive evaluation methods. Statistics and Management, 2022, 37(2): 45-48. |
| 李笑梅. 多指标综合评价方法综述. 统计与管理, 2022, 37(2): 45-48. |
| [1] | Ping-dong LIN, Fu-rong MIAO, Jing LIU, Wen YUE, Xin-zhu CHEN. Effects of additives on the quality and microbial diversity of tea residue silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(8): 123-133. |
| [2] | Bo-hong ZHANG, Xiang MA, Ze-liang JU, Lian-xue DUAN, Xiao-jun WANG, Zhi-feng JIA. Genetic diversity analysis and multi-trait evaluation of oat germplasm under different ecological conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(7): 151-164. |
| [3] | Zhi-gang SU, You-jian HAN, Jian-hang ZHANG, Jun-xi WU, Ya-mei XU, Baosaihenna, Yan-jun MIAO, Zhong-hua CAO. Effects of nitrogen application and sowing rates on the seed yield and quality of Elymus nutans ‘Baqing’ [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(7): 175-187. |
| [4] | Shao-yan YUAN, Yuan-kun LIU, Shi-jie CAI, Ting-xin LEI, Ping-ping ZHOU, Jun-zhen WANG, Hong-hai YAN. Comprehensive evaluation of the salt tolerance of diverse oat germplasm at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 49-59. |
| [5] | Yu-lin NIU, Ming-fang BAO, Wen-hu WANG, Xin CHEN, Kai-qiang LIU, Wen-hui LIU, Yan QIN. A multivariate evaluation of agronomic traits, yield and seed production in ten accessions of Bromus inermis from the Three-River-Source Region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 83-92. |
| [6] | Yue-qi LI, Tao MA, Yu-ping DING, Ming SU, Tao LI, Xiao-ying MA, Feng-lan MA, Meng-hu WAN, Qing-yun LI, Dan ZHANG, Na WU, Ji-li LIU. Adaptation of maize varieties in saline and alkaline land in Ningxia based on growth-nutrient accumulation-yield synergistic regulation [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 93-107. |
| [7] | Fei LI, Lin ZHANG, Ke-jia DE, Ting-xu FENG, Wei-shan LIN, Xue-mei XIANG, Xi-jie WEI. Effects of mixed sowing of oat and common vetch on the microbial diversity of inter-root soil in the Sanjiangyuan region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(5): 99-112. |
| [8] | Chao-rong LIU, Yong-cheng CHEN, Ying CHEN, Xu-dong ZHANG, Tian-yu HU, Li-he SU, Fan-fan ZHANG, Xu-zhe WANG, Kun YAO, Chun-hui MA. Differences in saline-alkali tolerance of five Leymus chinensis cultivars grown in saline-alkali soil from Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 29-41. |
| [9] | Yi-bo WANG, Xue-hua MING, Jian-yong ZHANG, Qi YUAN, Jian-ming DU, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Yi-yin ZHANG, Jian LAN, Le MU. Multi-trait evaluation of the production performance and seed yield of new oat germplasm materials in the arid area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 86-99. |
| [10] | Hao-bin JIA, Hao-yun JIANG, Ai-hua LI, Hai-bo WANG, Sun-quan LIN, Yue PAN, Jun-hong HUO, Jin-shun ZHAN. Effects of diets with different concentrate-to-roughage ratios on the growth rate, serum biochemical indexes, and rumen fermentation of Guangfeng goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 170-184. |
| [11] | Xiang MA, Zhong-xing LI, Rong-chen YANG, Ze-liang JU, Zhi-feng JIA, Pei-zhi YANG. The effect of salt stress on sugar and endogenous hormone content in oat varieties with contrasting salt tolerance [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 235-244. |
| [12] | Kong-tao WEI, Chun-ping ZHANG, Yang YU, Zheng-she ZHANG, Ze ZHOU, Xue ZHANG, Xin-xin WANG, Si-yu YUE, Quan CAO, Quan-min DONG. Yield performance, nutritional quality, and soil physicochemical responses of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars in the Qinghai Lake-Gonghe Basin region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 107-118. |
| [13] | Zhi-peng ZHANG, Qing-xue JIANG, Xin-yue ZHOU, Tong MIAO, Jun TANG, Deng-xia YI, Xue-min WANG, Lin MA. Screening of candidate genes for plant height in forage oat (Avena sativa) through combined transcriptome and proteome analysis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 147-161. |
| [14] | Yi-xin LIU, Xiao-qing SUI, Xin-yao WANG, Meng-qing LANG, Ling-zi-yin SUN, Er-ge JIER. Mitigating effects of exogenous melatonin on alfalfa under salt stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 206-214. |
| [15] | Xiao-hong BAI, Wen-yan CHEN, Qin LI, Yi-xuan WANG, Xue ZHANG, Lei WANG, Wen-jie QU, Lin ZHU. Seed germination and seedling growth characteristics of Glycyrrhiza uralensis from different provenances [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(7): 196-209. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||