Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 82-92.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022473
Previous Articles Next Articles
Feng LI1(), Wen-long LI1, Xue LI2, Zhong-juan ZHANG2, Lin-po BAI3, Yu-fei ZHAO4, Ya TAO1()
Received:
2022-11-30
Revised:
2023-01-04
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-07-26
Contact:
Ya TAO
Feng LI, Wen-long LI, Xue LI, Zhong-juan ZHANG, Lin-po BAI, Yu-fei ZHAO, Ya TAO. A multi-trait evaluation of the performance of 16 forage oat varieties in central and southern Heilongjiang Province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 82-92.
编号Number | 品种名称Variety name | 品种来源Variety source | 编号Number | 品种名称Variety name | 品种来源Variety source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 加拿大 Canada | 9 | 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 中国吉林省 Jilin,China |
2 | 大汉Dahan | 加拿大 Canada | 10 | 林纳Lena | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China |
3 | 蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 加拿大 Canada | 11 | 魅力Charisma | 加拿大 Canada |
4 | 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 12 | 领袖Souris | 美国 USA |
5 | 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 13 | 太阳神Helios | 美国 USA |
6 | 青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 14 | 爱沃Everleaf | 美国 USA |
7 | 黑贝Heibei | 加拿大 Canada | 15 | 牧王Haymaker | 加拿大 Canada |
8 | 青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 16 | 科纳Kona | 加拿大 Canada |
Table 1 Oat varieties and sources for testing
编号Number | 品种名称Variety name | 品种来源Variety source | 编号Number | 品种名称Variety name | 品种来源Variety source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 加拿大 Canada | 9 | 白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 中国吉林省 Jilin,China |
2 | 大汉Dahan | 加拿大 Canada | 10 | 林纳Lena | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China |
3 | 蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 加拿大 Canada | 11 | 魅力Charisma | 加拿大 Canada |
4 | 青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 12 | 领袖Souris | 美国 USA |
5 | 青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 13 | 太阳神Helios | 美国 USA |
6 | 青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 14 | 爱沃Everleaf | 美国 USA |
7 | 黑贝Heibei | 加拿大 Canada | 15 | 牧王Haymaker | 加拿大 Canada |
8 | 青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 中国青海省 Qinghai,China | 16 | 科纳Kona | 加拿大 Canada |
品种 Variety | 物候期Phonological stage (月/日Month/day) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗期 Seeding stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 灌浆期 Grain filling stage | 乳熟期 Milking stage | |
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 4/24 | 5/5 | 5/19 | 5/28 | 6/18 | 7/1 | 7/12 |
大汉Dahan | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/21 | 7/1 | 7/12 |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/20 | 7/2 | 7/15 |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 5/28 | 6/14 | 6/29 | 7/11 |
青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/17 | 7/1 | 7/13 |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/18 | 6/5 | 6/16 | 6/28 | 7/10 |
黑贝 Heibei | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/18 | 7/1 | 7/10 |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/18 | 5/28 | 6/12 | 6/25 | 7/4 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/18 | 5/28 | 6/20 | 7/1 | 7/9 |
林纳Lena | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/15 | 6/25 | 7/4 |
魅力Charisma | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/22 | 7/3 | 7/12 |
领袖Souris | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/22 | 7/2 | 7/14 |
太阳神Helios | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/20 | 7/1 | 7/13 |
爱沃Everleaf | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/19 | 6/28 | 7/8 | 7/17 |
牧王Haymaker | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/19 | 6/28 | 7/8 | 7/18 |
科纳Kona | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/19 | 6/11 | 6/25 | 7/5 | 7/15 |
Table 2 The reproductive period of 16 oat varieties
品种 Variety | 物候期Phonological stage (月/日Month/day) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗期 Seeding stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 灌浆期 Grain filling stage | 乳熟期 Milking stage | |
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 4/24 | 5/5 | 5/19 | 5/28 | 6/18 | 7/1 | 7/12 |
大汉Dahan | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/21 | 7/1 | 7/12 |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/20 | 7/2 | 7/15 |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 5/28 | 6/14 | 6/29 | 7/11 |
青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/17 | 7/1 | 7/13 |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/18 | 6/5 | 6/16 | 6/28 | 7/10 |
黑贝 Heibei | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/18 | 7/1 | 7/10 |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/18 | 5/28 | 6/12 | 6/25 | 7/4 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/18 | 5/28 | 6/20 | 7/1 | 7/9 |
林纳Lena | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/15 | 6/25 | 7/4 |
魅力Charisma | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/22 | 7/3 | 7/12 |
领袖Souris | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/22 | 7/2 | 7/14 |
太阳神Helios | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/5 | 6/20 | 7/1 | 7/13 |
爱沃Everleaf | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/19 | 6/28 | 7/8 | 7/17 |
牧王Haymaker | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/20 | 6/19 | 6/28 | 7/8 | 7/18 |
科纳Kona | 4/25 | 5/5 | 5/19 | 6/11 | 6/25 | 7/5 | 7/15 |
品种Variety | 孕穗期Booting stage | 抽穗期Heading stage | 灌浆期Grain filling stage | 乳熟期Milking stage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | |
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
大汉Dahan | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 10.50 | 1 |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 0.00 | 0 | 32.14 | 2 | 35.15 | 2 | 89.46 | 3 |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 90.68 | 3 |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
黑贝 Heibei | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 85.79 | 3 |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 0.00 | 0 | 29.10 | 2 | 32.03 | 2 | 93.20 | 3 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 91.47 | 3 |
林纳Lena | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 80.06 | 3 |
魅力Charisma | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
领袖Souris | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 79.04 | 3 |
太阳神Helios | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
爱沃Everleaf | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 41.20 | 2 |
牧王Haymaker | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 21.68 | 2 | 44.28 | 2 |
科纳Kona | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
Table 3 The lodging situation of 16 oat varieties in different periods
品种Variety | 孕穗期Booting stage | 抽穗期Heading stage | 灌浆期Grain filling stage | 乳熟期Milking stage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 田间倒伏率Lodging rate(%) | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | |
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
大汉Dahan | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 10.50 | 1 |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 0.00 | 0 | 32.14 | 2 | 35.15 | 2 | 89.46 | 3 |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 90.68 | 3 |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
黑贝 Heibei | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 85.79 | 3 |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 0.00 | 0 | 29.10 | 2 | 32.03 | 2 | 93.20 | 3 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 91.47 | 3 |
林纳Lena | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 80.06 | 3 |
魅力Charisma | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
领袖Souris | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 79.04 | 3 |
太阳神Helios | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
爱沃Everleaf | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 41.20 | 2 |
牧王Haymaker | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 21.68 | 2 | 44.28 | 2 |
科纳Kona | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
品种 Variety | 株高 Plant height(cm) | 茎秆直径 Stem diameter(mm) | 有效分蘖数 Effective tiller number (pieces·plant-1) | 干草产量 Dry yield (kg·hm-2) | 鲜草产量 Fresh yield (kg·hm-2) | 干鲜比 Dry-to-fresh ratio | 茎叶比 Stem-leaf ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 113.73d | 3.56c | 4.00abc | 14635.76a | 36905.00a | 0.32cde | 0.97bcdef |
大汉Dahan | 120.13bc | 4.92abc | 5.00ab | 11732.07bc | 27428.50bc | 0.35bcd | 0.99bcdef |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 107.80e | 5.39ab | 5.00ab | 7287.73g | 20493.00fg | 0.31cde | 0.77efg |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 130.73a | 5.58ab | 3.33bc | 10367.17cde | 25283.50cde | 0.36bcd | 1.06bcd |
青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 130.73a | 4.89abc | 4.67ab | 11174.59bcd | 25038.57cde | 0.37abc | 1.34a |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 121.60b | 5.57ab | 5.67a | 8086.04efg | 19366.97g | 0.36bc | 0.70g |
黑贝 Heibei | 131.13a | 4.70bc | 5.33ab | 7436.20fg | 21449.63fg | 0.31cde | 0.99bcdef |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 106.00e | 4.16bc | 3.33bc | 11432.70bcd | 30231.30b | 0.32cde | 1.14ab |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 126.13ab | 3.90bc | 4.67ab | 12756.18ab | 27453.43bc | 0.40ab | 1.19ab |
林纳Lena | 106.53e | 4.87abc | 2.67c | 9783.13cdef | 26233.53cd | 0.31cde | 1.04bcde |
魅力Charisma | 102.20e | 4.86abc | 3.33bc | 9067.41defg | 27128.93bc | 0.28e | 0.84cdefg |
领袖Souris | 115.40cd | 4.88abc | 3.67bc | 9686.00cdefg | 26771.07bcd | 0.31cde | 1.08bcd |
太阳神Helios | 114.73cd | 6.42a | 4.00abc | 7883.43fg | 22116.60efg | 0.31cde | 1.06bcd |
爱沃Everleaf | 106.33e | 4.92abc | 4.00abc | 9065.46defg | 26871.90bc | 0.29de | 1.09bc |
牧王Haymaker | 120.67bc | 5.24abc | 3.67bc | 11997.81bcd | 27368.00bc | 0.36bcd | 0.75fg |
科纳Kona | 96.40f | 4.56bc | 4.00abc | 13017.33ab | 23328.80def | 0.43a | 0.81defg |
P值P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
变异系数CV(%) | 9.326 | 16.767 | 23.857 | 21.522 | 16.402 | 12.964 | 19.068 |
Table 4 Agronomic trait differences among the 16 oat varieties
品种 Variety | 株高 Plant height(cm) | 茎秆直径 Stem diameter(mm) | 有效分蘖数 Effective tiller number (pieces·plant-1) | 干草产量 Dry yield (kg·hm-2) | 鲜草产量 Fresh yield (kg·hm-2) | 干鲜比 Dry-to-fresh ratio | 茎叶比 Stem-leaf ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 113.73d | 3.56c | 4.00abc | 14635.76a | 36905.00a | 0.32cde | 0.97bcdef |
大汉Dahan | 120.13bc | 4.92abc | 5.00ab | 11732.07bc | 27428.50bc | 0.35bcd | 0.99bcdef |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 107.80e | 5.39ab | 5.00ab | 7287.73g | 20493.00fg | 0.31cde | 0.77efg |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 130.73a | 5.58ab | 3.33bc | 10367.17cde | 25283.50cde | 0.36bcd | 1.06bcd |
青海甜燕麦Qinghai sweet oat | 130.73a | 4.89abc | 4.67ab | 11174.59bcd | 25038.57cde | 0.37abc | 1.34a |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 121.60b | 5.57ab | 5.67a | 8086.04efg | 19366.97g | 0.36bc | 0.70g |
黑贝 Heibei | 131.13a | 4.70bc | 5.33ab | 7436.20fg | 21449.63fg | 0.31cde | 0.99bcdef |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 106.00e | 4.16bc | 3.33bc | 11432.70bcd | 30231.30b | 0.32cde | 1.14ab |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 126.13ab | 3.90bc | 4.67ab | 12756.18ab | 27453.43bc | 0.40ab | 1.19ab |
林纳Lena | 106.53e | 4.87abc | 2.67c | 9783.13cdef | 26233.53cd | 0.31cde | 1.04bcde |
魅力Charisma | 102.20e | 4.86abc | 3.33bc | 9067.41defg | 27128.93bc | 0.28e | 0.84cdefg |
领袖Souris | 115.40cd | 4.88abc | 3.67bc | 9686.00cdefg | 26771.07bcd | 0.31cde | 1.08bcd |
太阳神Helios | 114.73cd | 6.42a | 4.00abc | 7883.43fg | 22116.60efg | 0.31cde | 1.06bcd |
爱沃Everleaf | 106.33e | 4.92abc | 4.00abc | 9065.46defg | 26871.90bc | 0.29de | 1.09bc |
牧王Haymaker | 120.67bc | 5.24abc | 3.67bc | 11997.81bcd | 27368.00bc | 0.36bcd | 0.75fg |
科纳Kona | 96.40f | 4.56bc | 4.00abc | 13017.33ab | 23328.80def | 0.43a | 0.81defg |
P值P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
变异系数CV(%) | 9.326 | 16.767 | 23.857 | 21.522 | 16.402 | 12.964 | 19.068 |
品种 Variety | 粗蛋白 Crude protein(%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) | 可溶性碳水化合物 Water-soluble carbohydrates (%DM) | 粗脂肪 Ether extract(%DM) | 粗灰分 Crude ash(%DM) | 相对饲草质量 Relative feed quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 10.63ab | 47.72cd | 23.52c | 4.73efgh | 1.43bcd | 6.90bc | 202.21ab |
大汉Dahan | 10.67ab | 54.33abc | 30.92ab | 6.18cde | 1.51abcd | 8.88abc | 150.14cd |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 11.39a | 49.46bcd | 28.79bc | 8.76ab | 1.25cd | 8.87abc | 177.27abc |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 10.40abc | 56.45ab | 33.88ab | 5.74def | 1.28cd | 8.73abc | 134.70cd |
青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat | 10.39abc | 54.27abc | 32.18ab | 10.18a | 1.38bcd | 8.41abc | 146.63cd |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 9.44bc | 55.54ab | 33.41ab | 7.00cd | 1.60abcd | 7.81abc | 138.86cd |
黑贝Heibei | 9.30bc | 53.94abc | 34.06ab | 6.94cd | 1.88a | 8.98abc | 142.70cd |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 8.61c | 54.79abc | 31.08ab | 4.25fgh | 1.70abc | 9.34a | 147.30cd |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 10.29abc | 46.33d | 23.68c | 7.73bc | 1.60abcd | 6.67c | 208.78a |
林纳Lena | 9.32bc | 53.40abc | 30.51ab | 5.34defg | 1.37cd | 8.98abc | 154.35cd |
魅力Charisma | 9.69abc | 57.84a | 34.44ab | 5.13efgh | 1.33cd | 10.10a | 128.28d |
领袖Souris | 9.96abc | 51.17abcd | 28.54bc | 3.67gh | 1.30cd | 8.85abc | 169.29bcd |
太阳神Helios | 9.59abc | 55.51ab | 33.25ab | 3.78gh | 1.19d | 9.08ab | 139.12cd |
爱沃Everleaf | 8.72c | 57.09a | 34.99a | 3.52h | 1.49abcd | 9.13ab | 129.54d |
牧王Haymaker | 9.79abc | 53.97abc | 30.89ab | 3.97gh | 1.46abcd | 7.84abc | 151.41cd |
科纳Kona | 9.76abc | 42.86abc | 32.54ab | 5.04efgh | 1.81ab | 6.79bc | 147.25cd |
P值P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
变异系数CV(%) | 9.01 | 7.04 | 12.26 | 34.26 | 15.92 | 13.80 | 16.99 |
Table 5 Differences in nutrients among the 16 oat varieties
品种 Variety | 粗蛋白 Crude protein(%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) | 可溶性碳水化合物 Water-soluble carbohydrates (%DM) | 粗脂肪 Ether extract(%DM) | 粗灰分 Crude ash(%DM) | 相对饲草质量 Relative feed quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
猛士1号Mengshi No.1 | 10.63ab | 47.72cd | 23.52c | 4.73efgh | 1.43bcd | 6.90bc | 202.21ab |
大汉Dahan | 10.67ab | 54.33abc | 30.92ab | 6.18cde | 1.51abcd | 8.88abc | 150.14cd |
蓝鸟1号Lanniao No.1 | 11.39a | 49.46bcd | 28.79bc | 8.76ab | 1.25cd | 8.87abc | 177.27abc |
青引1号Qingyin No.1 | 10.40abc | 56.45ab | 33.88ab | 5.74def | 1.28cd | 8.73abc | 134.70cd |
青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat | 10.39abc | 54.27abc | 32.18ab | 10.18a | 1.38bcd | 8.41abc | 146.63cd |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 9.44bc | 55.54ab | 33.41ab | 7.00cd | 1.60abcd | 7.81abc | 138.86cd |
黑贝Heibei | 9.30bc | 53.94abc | 34.06ab | 6.94cd | 1.88a | 8.98abc | 142.70cd |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 8.61c | 54.79abc | 31.08ab | 4.25fgh | 1.70abc | 9.34a | 147.30cd |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 10.29abc | 46.33d | 23.68c | 7.73bc | 1.60abcd | 6.67c | 208.78a |
林纳Lena | 9.32bc | 53.40abc | 30.51ab | 5.34defg | 1.37cd | 8.98abc | 154.35cd |
魅力Charisma | 9.69abc | 57.84a | 34.44ab | 5.13efgh | 1.33cd | 10.10a | 128.28d |
领袖Souris | 9.96abc | 51.17abcd | 28.54bc | 3.67gh | 1.30cd | 8.85abc | 169.29bcd |
太阳神Helios | 9.59abc | 55.51ab | 33.25ab | 3.78gh | 1.19d | 9.08ab | 139.12cd |
爱沃Everleaf | 8.72c | 57.09a | 34.99a | 3.52h | 1.49abcd | 9.13ab | 129.54d |
牧王Haymaker | 9.79abc | 53.97abc | 30.89ab | 3.97gh | 1.46abcd | 7.84abc | 151.41cd |
科纳Kona | 9.76abc | 42.86abc | 32.54ab | 5.04efgh | 1.81ab | 6.79bc | 147.25cd |
P值P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
变异系数CV(%) | 9.01 | 7.04 | 12.26 | 34.26 | 15.92 | 13.80 | 16.99 |
指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank | 指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
粗蛋白CP | 0.0844 | 2 | 株高 Plant height | 0.0885 | 1 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF | 0.0765 | 3 | 茎秆直径Stem diameter | 0.0702 | 8 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 0.0711 | 7 | 有效分蘖数Effective tiller number | 0.0683 | 9 |
可溶性碳水化合物WSC | 0.0544 | 14 | 干草产量Dry yield | 0.0654 | 12 |
粗脂肪EE | 0.0733 | 5 | 鲜草产量Fresh yield | 0.0633 | 13 |
粗灰分Ash | 0.0756 | 4 | 干鲜比Dry-to-fresh ratio | 0.0730 | 6 |
相对饲草质量RFQ | 0.0680 | 10 | 茎叶比Stem-leaf ratio | 0.0679 | 11 |
Table 6 The weight coefficient and rank of different indicators
指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank | 指标 Index | 权重系数 Weighting coefficient | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
粗蛋白CP | 0.0844 | 2 | 株高 Plant height | 0.0885 | 1 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF | 0.0765 | 3 | 茎秆直径Stem diameter | 0.0702 | 8 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 0.0711 | 7 | 有效分蘖数Effective tiller number | 0.0683 | 9 |
可溶性碳水化合物WSC | 0.0544 | 14 | 干草产量Dry yield | 0.0654 | 12 |
粗脂肪EE | 0.0733 | 5 | 鲜草产量Fresh yield | 0.0633 | 13 |
粗灰分Ash | 0.0756 | 4 | 干鲜比Dry-to-fresh ratio | 0.0730 | 6 |
相对饲草质量RFQ | 0.0680 | 10 | 茎叶比Stem-leaf ratio | 0.0679 | 11 |
品种Variety | 等权关联度Equal weight incidence degree | 排序Rank | 加权关联度Weighted incidence degree | 排序Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
猛士1号 Mengshi No.1 | 0.7247 | 2 | 0.7292 | 2 |
大汉 Dahan | 0.6204 | 8 | 0.6297 | 8 |
蓝鸟1号 Lanniao No.1 | 0.6432 | 6 | 0.6489 | 6 |
青引1号 Qingyin No.1 | 0.5867 | 10 | 0.6008 | 10 |
青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat | 0.6474 | 5 | 0.6517 | 5 |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 0.6567 | 4 | 0.6635 | 4 |
黑贝 Heibei | 0.6177 | 9 | 0.6296 | 9 |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 0.5535 | 13 | 0.5587 | 13 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 0.7402 | 1 | 0.7498 | 1 |
林纳Lena | 0.5425 | 14 | 0.5491 | 14 |
魅力 Charisma | 0.5293 | 15 | 0.5349 | 15 |
领袖Souris | 0.5670 | 11 | 0.5770 | 11 |
太阳神Helios | 0.5575 | 12 | 0.5673 | 12 |
爱沃 Everleaf | 0.5240 | 16 | 0.5308 | 16 |
牧王 Haymaker | 0.6205 | 7 | 0.6298 | 7 |
科纳 Kona | 0.6812 | 3 | 0.6901 | 3 |
Table 7 Gray correlation and rank of the 16 oat varieties
品种Variety | 等权关联度Equal weight incidence degree | 排序Rank | 加权关联度Weighted incidence degree | 排序Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
猛士1号 Mengshi No.1 | 0.7247 | 2 | 0.7292 | 2 |
大汉 Dahan | 0.6204 | 8 | 0.6297 | 8 |
蓝鸟1号 Lanniao No.1 | 0.6432 | 6 | 0.6489 | 6 |
青引1号 Qingyin No.1 | 0.5867 | 10 | 0.6008 | 10 |
青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat | 0.6474 | 5 | 0.6517 | 5 |
青引2号Qingyin No.2 | 0.6567 | 4 | 0.6635 | 4 |
黑贝 Heibei | 0.6177 | 9 | 0.6296 | 9 |
青海444 Qinghai No. 444 | 0.5535 | 13 | 0.5587 | 13 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 0.7402 | 1 | 0.7498 | 1 |
林纳Lena | 0.5425 | 14 | 0.5491 | 14 |
魅力 Charisma | 0.5293 | 15 | 0.5349 | 15 |
领袖Souris | 0.5670 | 11 | 0.5770 | 11 |
太阳神Helios | 0.5575 | 12 | 0.5673 | 12 |
爱沃 Everleaf | 0.5240 | 16 | 0.5308 | 16 |
牧王 Haymaker | 0.6205 | 7 | 0.6298 | 7 |
科纳 Kona | 0.6812 | 3 | 0.6901 | 3 |
1 | Ye X L, Gan Z, Wan Y, et al. Advances and perspectives in forage oat breeding. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 160-177. |
叶雪玲, 甘圳, 万燕, 等. 饲用燕麦育种研究进展与展望. 草业学报, 2023, 32(2): 160-177. | |
2 | Li F, Li W L, Zhang C X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of feeding value and productivity of spring sown oats in Ordos Region. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(12): 28-36. |
李峰, 李文龙, 张彩霞, 等. 鄂尔多斯地区春播燕麦饲用价值和生产力综合评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(12): 28-36. | |
3 | Wang X X, Zhu D J, Li Y, et al. Screening of oat varieties in winter fallow field in south. Seed, 2016, 35(5): 112-114. |
王霞霞, 朱德建, 李岩, 等. 南方冬闲田饲用燕麦品种筛选的研究. 种子, 2016, 35(5): 112-114. | |
4 | Zhang W, Zhou Q P, Chen Y J, et al. Comparison of production performance and forage quality of ten introduced oat varieties in Hulunbuir, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(12): 129-142. |
张伟, 周青平, 陈有军, 等. 呼伦贝尔地区10个引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲草品质比较. 草业学报, 2021, 30(12): 129-142. | |
5 | Wang Y G, Ji M Z, Zhao X H, et al. Effects of sowing dates on yield of Baiyan 7 in midwest of Heilongjiang Province. Crops, 2019(3): 106-111. |
王永刚, 姬铭泽, 赵旭涵, 等. 播期对白燕7号在黑龙江省中西部地区产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(3): 106-111. | |
6 | Song Y T, Wang J L, Liu J L, et al. Effects of fertilization and plant density on yield and quality of five oat varieties. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(6): 149-156, 164. |
宋雨桐, 王建丽, 刘杰淋, 等. 施肥和种植密度对5个燕麦品种产量和品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(6): 149-156, 164. | |
7 | Shi J J, Xue Y W, Guo W, et al. Evaluation of forage yield and nutritional value of introduced oat germplasm resources. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(9): 1063-1071. |
史京京, 薛盈文, 郭伟, 等. 引进燕麦种质资源饲草产量与饲用营养价值评价. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(9): 1063-1071. | |
8 | Yun X J, Yuan Q H, Su J K, et al. Code of practice for herbage variety registration, GB/T 30395-2013. Beijing: National Animal Husbandry Services, 2013. |
贠旭疆, 袁庆华, 苏加楷, 等. 草品种审定技术规程, GB/T 30395-2013. 北京: 全国畜牧总站, 2013. | |
9 | Nan M, Li J, Zhao G Q, et al. Relationship between lodging resistance of oats and the basal internode stem characteristics and lignin synthesis. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 172-180. |
南铭, 李晶, 赵桂琴, 等. 茎秆基部节间特性和木质素合成与燕麦抗倒伏的关系. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 172-180. | |
10 | Chen X, Wu B, Zhang Z W. Evaluation of adaptability and stability for important agronomic traits of oat (Avena spp.) germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(4): 577-585. |
陈新, 吴斌, 张宗文. 燕麦种质资源重要农艺性状适应性和稳定性评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4): 577-585. | |
11 | Kelman W M, Dove H. Growth and phenology of winter wheat and oats in a dual-purpose management system. Crop and Pasture Science, 2009, 60(10): 921-932. |
12 | Li G, Zheng M N, Li Y F. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of forage oat varieties in northern Shanxi Province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 42-53. |
李刚, 郑敏娜, 李荫藩. 饲用燕麦品种在晋北农牧交错区的生产性能和营养价值研究. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 42-53. | |
13 | Zhang Q Q, Liang Q W, Yang X F, et al. Production performance of 12 oat varieties in the Aru Kerqin Banner. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(3): 29-35, 44. |
张晴晴, 梁庆伟, 杨秀芳, 等. 12份燕麦品种在阿鲁科尔沁旗地区的生产性能研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(3): 29-35, 44. | |
14 | Fu D Q, Wang Y C, Mao J X, et al. Comprehensive quality analysis and evaluation oat varieties under dry farming conditions in balluk mountain. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 344-352. |
付东青, 王彦超, 毛家乡, 等. 山区旱作条件下不同燕麦品种品质分析及评价. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 344-352. | |
15 | Wu H Y, Qu N, Qu Z, et al. Comparison of crop yield and forage quality of six oat varieties in Angren County, Shigatse. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. |
吴海艳, 曲尼, 曲珍, 等. 6个燕麦品种在昂仁县的生产性能及饲草品质比较. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. | |
16 | Wang T F, Chang Y R, Deng X, et al. Adaptability evaluation of feed oat varieties in rain fed area of Ningxia. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1755-1762. |
王腾飞, 常怡然, 邓雪, 等. 饲用燕麦品种在宁夏雨养区的适应性评价. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1755-1762. | |
17 | Zhang G Y, Shen Z X, Shao X M, et al. A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of ten imported oat varieties in Damxung County of Xizang, China. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(4): 1083-1089. |
张光雨, 沈振西, 邵小明, 等. 西藏当雄10个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1083-1089. | |
18 | Xu X R, Fan Y, Liu S Y, et al. Analysis on the difference of multi-component nutrition of oat forage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(1): 43-49. |
徐欣然, 范昱, 刘思源, 等. 燕麦饲草多组分营养差异分析. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(1): 43-49. | |
19 | Zhang Q P, Tian L H, Jiang H L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance of annual forage crops in Longdong Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(2): 25-28. |
张清平, 田莉华, 蒋海亮, 等. 甘肃陇东黄土高原一年生饲草生产性能综合评价研究. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(2): 25-28. | |
20 | Chen C J, Zeng Y X, Shi S L, et al. Study on production performance and quality of introduced oat varieties for feeding in hilly region of western Loess Plateau. Feed Research, 2022, 45(2): 102-106. |
陈彩锦, 曾燕霞, 师尚礼, 等. 黄土高原西部丘陵区饲用燕麦生产性能和品质. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(2): 102-106. | |
21 | Xu Y D, Zhu R F, Ran Q F, et al. Comprehensive evaluation about production performance and feed value of 19 oat varieties in Chongqing. Feed Research, 2022, 45(19): 109-113. |
徐远东, 朱瑞芬, 冉启凡, 等. 19份燕麦品种(系)在重庆地区的生产性能与饲用价值综合评价. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19): 109-113. | |
22 | Li Z Q. Oat hay quality evaluation. China Dairy Cattle, 2013(19): 1-3. |
李志强. 燕麦干草质量评价. 中国奶牛, 2013(19): 1-3. | |
23 | Wang Y T, Yang Z M, Liu J C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of 21 oat varieties in northwest of Hebei Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318. |
王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 等. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318. | |
24 | Zhang G Y, Ma H P, Shao X M, et al. A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the valley region of Tibet, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 121-131. |
张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 等. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 121-131. | |
25 | Wang Q, Li Z J, Li J, et al. Evaluation of agronomic and forage quality traits of a range of oat cultivars. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 149-158. |
王茜, 李志坚, 李晶, 等. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 149-158. |
[1] | Yong-hong SHI, Peng GAO, Zhi-hong FANG, Xiang ZHAO, Wei HAN, Jiang-ming WEI, Lin LIU, Jin-zhen LI. Evaluation of resistance to Colletotrichum cereale and analysis of loss in a field of fifteen imported oat cultivars [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 130-142. |
[2] | Zeng-hui LIU, Su-jin LU, Yu-xin WANG, Chun-hui ZHANG, Xin YIN. Effects of biodiversity on primary productivity and its mechanism in artificially sown clonal plant communities of the Sanjiangyuan region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 27-38. |
[3] | Cong-ze JIANG, Na SHOU, Wei GAO, Ren-shi MA, Yu-ying SHEN, Xian-long YANG. A multivariate evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different varieties of silage maize in the dry plateau area of Longdong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 216-228. |
[4] | Ting YE, Xiao-juan WU, Yi-xiao LU, Sheng-juan LIU, Zhuo-hui JIANG, Hui-min YANG. Effect of planting ratio on the stability of forage yield and population density in two alfalfa-grass mixtures [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 127-137. |
[5] | Mei-hui LI, Yu-hua LI, Xin-hui YAN, Hang-hang TUO, Meng-ru YANG, Zi-lin WANG, Wei LI. Characteristics of plant diversity and aboveground productivity and their relationship driven by subshrub expansion [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 27-39. |
[6] | Yi-dan YAN, Ying-ying NIE, Li-jun XU, Xing-fa GAO, Yan-zhang RAO, Xiong RAO, Hong-zhi ZHANG, Cha-shu ZHAO, Yan-ping ZHU, Yu-bo ZHU. Potential excavation and evaluation of functional oat varieties in winter fallow field of southwest mountainous area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 42-53. |
[7] | Teng-fei WANG, Bin WANG, Jian-qiang DENG, Man-you LI, Wang NI, Qin FENG, Yun-yun TUO, Jian LAN. Effect of sowing rate on yield and forage quality of a Dolichos lablab-Sorghum bicolor mixture under drip irrigation in arid areas of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 30-40. |
[8] | Xue-ling YE, Zhen GAN, Yan WAN, Da-bing XIANG, Xiao-yong WU, Qi WU, Chang-ying LIU, Yu FAN, Liang ZOU. Advances and perspectives in forage oat breeding [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 160-177. |
[9] | Qi WANG, Jia-hua ZHENG, Meng-li ZHAO, Jun ZHANG. Effects of mowing intensity on community characteristics and soil physicochemical properties of Stipa grandis steppe, Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 26-34. |
[10] | Yu-bao SHA, Ganjurjav HASBAGAN, Guo-zheng HU, Xue-xia WANG, Jun YAN, Shi-cheng HE, Qing-zhu GAO. Response of soil nematode community structure and diversity to increased nitrogen in alpine meadows of northern Tibet [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 154-164. |
[11] | Rui-jing WANG, Qi-sheng FENG, Zhe-ren JIN, Jie LIU, Yu-ting ZHAO, Jing GE, Tian-gang LIANG. A study on restoration potential of degraded grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 11-22. |
[12] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Min-hao CHEN, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Jie BAI, Ming SU. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and substitution with microbial fertilizer on the growth of Elymus nutans [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 53-61. |
[13] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Shu-chao HUANG, Yan-shan YANG, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Yin-cui ZHANG. Effects of combined application of microbial fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on the growth of Lolium perenne [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 136-143. |
[14] | Ji-cheng SHEN, Lei WANG, Cai-xia ZHAO, Fa-hui YE, Shi-kai LV, De-mei LIU, Rui-juan LIU, Huai-gang ZHANG, Wen-jie CHEN. Analysis of the grain related traits of 77 naked oat varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 156-167. |
[15] | Ya-hui WANG, Wen-jia TANG, Sen LI, Hong-yan ZHAO, Jia-li XIE, Chao MA, Chang-zhen YAN. Change in grassland productivity in Qinghai Province and its driving factors [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 1-13. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||