草业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 202-215.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025279
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
许江博1(
), 梅昌伟2, 陈东1(
), 蒋润瑶1, 郭松长1, 吴秀鸿3, 罗巨英4, 黄海元5, 刘芳6
收稿日期:2025-07-08
修回日期:2025-09-03
出版日期:2026-06-20
发布日期:2026-04-13
通讯作者:
陈东
作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: chendong_326@126.com基金资助:
Jiang-bo XU1(
), Chang-wei MEI2, Dong CHEN1(
), Run-yao JIANG1, Song-chang GUO1, Xiu-hong WU3, Ju-ying LUO4, Hai-yuan HUANG5, Fang LIU6
Received:2025-07-08
Revised:2025-09-03
Online:2026-06-20
Published:2026-04-13
Contact:
Dong CHEN
摘要:
本试验旨在研究苜蓿草粉对凉伞猪不同杂交组合生产性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和血清生化指标的影响。本试验采取双因素试验设计,共设置4个组:EGⅠ组(藏凉F1,饲喂苜蓿饲粮)、CGⅠ组(藏凉F1,饲喂基础饲粮)、EGⅡ组(巴凉F1,饲喂苜蓿饲粮)、CGⅡ组(巴凉F1,饲喂基础饲粮)、每组设置3个重复,每个重复10只猪,试验期为49 d,其中基础饲粮为试验场自配饲粮,苜蓿饲粮处理为以苜蓿草粉替代基础饲粮的9.6%,试验动物选取体况优良、体重接近(91.20±10.07 kg)和无病健康的8月龄凉伞猪不同杂交组合子代猪。本试验系统地评估了两种杂交组合和两种饲粮对于生产性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和血清生化指标的影响,并探讨了其的交互作用。结果表明:1)当杂交组合为主效应时,CGⅡ组的平均日增重、屠宰率、净肉率、眼肌面积、谷氨酸、精氨酸、总抗氧化能力显著高于CGⅠ组(P<0.05),EGⅡ组的屠宰率、粗脂肪和谷胱甘肽-过氧化物酶活性显著高于EGⅠ组(P<0.05),EGⅠ组的粗蛋白质和二十二碳酸含量显著高于EGⅡ组(P<0.05),CGⅠ组的粗蛋白质和葡萄糖含量显著高于CGⅡ组(P<0.05)。2)当饲粮类型为主效应时,CGⅡ组的丙二醛含量显著高于EGⅡ组(P<0.05),EG组的背最长肌精氨酸和总抗氧化能力显著高于CG组(P<0.05)。3)饲粮类型与杂交组合在精氨酸和α-亚麻酸上存在显著交互作用(P<0.05)。4)其余各指标间无显著差异,但与基础日粮组(CG组)相比,苜蓿日粮组(EG组)的料肉比、粗脂肪、滴水损失、黄度值、十五碳酸、十七碳酸、二十二碳酸、二十四碳酸含量均有所降低(P>0.05),粗蛋白质、天冬氨酸、甘氨酸、丙氨酸、脯氨酸、酪氨酸、亮氨酸、丁酸含量和超氧化物歧化酶、碱性磷酸酶活性均有所升高(P>0.05)。综上所述,在育肥后期饲喂苜蓿饲粮可以降低杂交组合的料肉比,改善饲料利用率,提高总抗氧化能力,有效改善两种杂交组合的肉品质。
许江博, 梅昌伟, 陈东, 蒋润瑶, 郭松长, 吴秀鸿, 罗巨英, 黄海元, 刘芳. 苜蓿草粉对凉伞猪不同杂交组合生产性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(6): 202-215.
Jiang-bo XU, Chang-wei MEI, Dong CHEN, Run-yao JIANG, Song-chang GUO, Xiu-hong WU, Ju-ying LUO, Hai-yuan HUANG, Fang LIU. The effect of alfalfa meal on the average daily gain, slaughter performance, meat quality, and serum biochemical indicators of two different hybrid lines of Liangsan pigs[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(6): 202-215.
原料 Ingredients | 基础饲粮 Basal diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet |
|---|---|---|
| 原料Ingredient | ||
| 玉米粉 Corn flour (%) | 55 | 49.5 |
| 豆粕 Soybean meal (%) | 21 | 18.9 |
| 米糠 Rice bran (%) | 10 | 9 |
| 麸皮 Bran (%) | 10 | 9 |
| 苜蓿草粉 Alfalfa meal (%) | - | 9.6 |
| 1)预混料 Premix (%) | 4 | 4 |
| 合计 Total (%) | 100 | 100 |
| 营养水平 Nutrient level | ||
| 干物质 Dry matter (%) | 83.69 | 83.67 |
| 粗蛋白质 Crude protein (%) | 18.04 | 18.07 |
| 粗脂肪 Ether extract (%) | 4.29 | 4.08 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (%) | 6.19 | 7.97 |
| 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 13.59 | 15.76 |
| 钙Ca (%) | 0.49 | 0.62 |
| 总磷 Total phosphorus (%) | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| 赖氨酸 Lysine (%) | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| 蛋氨酸 Methionine (%) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| 苏氨酸 Threonine (%) | 0.52 | 0.54 |
| 色氨酸 Tryptophan (%) | 0.20 | 0.23 |
| 消化能 Digestive energy (MJ·kg-1) | 13.04 | 12.55 |
| 代谢能 Metabolic energy (MJ·kg-1) | 11.76 | 11.33 |
表1 饲粮组成及营养成分表(风干基础)
Table 1 Diet composition and nutrient composition (air-dried basis)
原料 Ingredients | 基础饲粮 Basal diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet |
|---|---|---|
| 原料Ingredient | ||
| 玉米粉 Corn flour (%) | 55 | 49.5 |
| 豆粕 Soybean meal (%) | 21 | 18.9 |
| 米糠 Rice bran (%) | 10 | 9 |
| 麸皮 Bran (%) | 10 | 9 |
| 苜蓿草粉 Alfalfa meal (%) | - | 9.6 |
| 1)预混料 Premix (%) | 4 | 4 |
| 合计 Total (%) | 100 | 100 |
| 营养水平 Nutrient level | ||
| 干物质 Dry matter (%) | 83.69 | 83.67 |
| 粗蛋白质 Crude protein (%) | 18.04 | 18.07 |
| 粗脂肪 Ether extract (%) | 4.29 | 4.08 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (%) | 6.19 | 7.97 |
| 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 13.59 | 15.76 |
| 钙Ca (%) | 0.49 | 0.62 |
| 总磷 Total phosphorus (%) | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| 赖氨酸 Lysine (%) | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| 蛋氨酸 Methionine (%) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| 苏氨酸 Threonine (%) | 0.52 | 0.54 |
| 色氨酸 Tryptophan (%) | 0.20 | 0.23 |
| 消化能 Digestive energy (MJ·kg-1) | 13.04 | 12.55 |
| 代谢能 Metabolic energy (MJ·kg-1) | 11.76 | 11.33 |
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
初始体重 Initial weight | 藏凉Zangliang | 90.90±10.12 | 90.90±9.95 | - | - | - |
| 巴凉Baliang | 91.60±10.25 | 91.40±10.03 | ||||
末重 Final weight | 藏凉Zangliang | 108.54±10.21B | 108.96±9.50 | 0.06 | 0.98 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 116.82±3.54A | 117.64±8.49 | ||||
ADFI (kg·d-1·head-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.24 | 3.21 | - | - | - |
| 巴凉Baliang | 3.71 | 3.71 | ||||
| FCR | 藏凉Zangliang | 7.29 | 7.10 | - | - | - |
| 巴凉Baliang | 7.65 | 7.39 | ||||
ADG (kg·d-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.43±0.07B | 0.42±0.08 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 0.60±0.03A | 0.62±0.27 | ||||
| BMR | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.33±0.03 | 0.34±0.35 | 0.21 | 0.52 | 0.68 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 0.28±0.06 | 0.31±0.03 | ||||
DP (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 72.48±2.24B | 71.00±3.16B | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.34 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 76.95±0.15A | 76.16±1.00A | ||||
NMP (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 52.05±1.11B | 48.57±22.50 | 0.34 | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 60.20±1.37A | 57.81±3.82 | ||||
EMA (cm2) | 藏凉Zangliang | 26.58±2.16B | 29.77±4.98 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.15 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 50.28±5.67A | 43.34±7.56 | ||||
表2 饲粮类型、杂交组合及其交互作用对生长性能和屠宰性能的影响
Table 2 Effects of diet types, hybrid combinations, and their interaction on growth performance and slaughter performance
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
初始体重 Initial weight | 藏凉Zangliang | 90.90±10.12 | 90.90±9.95 | - | - | - |
| 巴凉Baliang | 91.60±10.25 | 91.40±10.03 | ||||
末重 Final weight | 藏凉Zangliang | 108.54±10.21B | 108.96±9.50 | 0.06 | 0.98 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 116.82±3.54A | 117.64±8.49 | ||||
ADFI (kg·d-1·head-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.24 | 3.21 | - | - | - |
| 巴凉Baliang | 3.71 | 3.71 | ||||
| FCR | 藏凉Zangliang | 7.29 | 7.10 | - | - | - |
| 巴凉Baliang | 7.65 | 7.39 | ||||
ADG (kg·d-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.43±0.07B | 0.42±0.08 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 0.60±0.03A | 0.62±0.27 | ||||
| BMR | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.33±0.03 | 0.34±0.35 | 0.21 | 0.52 | 0.68 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 0.28±0.06 | 0.31±0.03 | ||||
DP (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 72.48±2.24B | 71.00±3.16B | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.34 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 76.95±0.15A | 76.16±1.00A | ||||
NMP (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 52.05±1.11B | 48.57±22.50 | 0.34 | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 60.20±1.37A | 57.81±3.82 | ||||
EMA (cm2) | 藏凉Zangliang | 26.58±2.16B | 29.77±4.98 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.15 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 50.28±5.67A | 43.34±7.56 | ||||
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
| 粗脂肪Ether extract (EE,%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 2.55±0.30 | 2.33±0.94B | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 4.07±1.42 | 3.90±0.99A | ||||
| 粗蛋白质Crude protein (CP,%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 80.03±1.95A | 80.07±2.51A | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 68.94±1.41B | 70.73±5.77B | ||||
| 蒸煮损失Cooking loss (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 33.52±2.31 | 32.82±2.47 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.81 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 31.84±1.06 | 33.91±8.77 | ||||
| 滴水损失Drip loss (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 2.76±0.31 | 2.48±0.14 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.97 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 2.65±0.08 | 2.39±0.26 | ||||
| 剪切力Shear force (N) | 藏凉Zangliang | 6.26±2.09 | 7.40±1.00 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.07 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 6.40±2.19 | 7.62±1.97 | ||||
| pH45min | 藏凉Zangliang | 6.41±0.20 | 6.58±0.09 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 0.19 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 6.06±0.40 | 6.35±0.35 | ||||
亮度 L* (0 h) | 藏凉Zangliang | 32.96±2.32 | 31.77±1.37 | 0.13 | 0.62 | 0.21 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 36.00±3.66 | 33.37±1.56 | ||||
红度 a* (0 h) | 藏凉Zangliang | 6.68±2.32 | 7.88±1.90 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.37 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 5.56±0.71 | 6.05±0.47 | ||||
黄度 b* (0 h) | 藏凉Zangliang | 7.93±1.01 | 5.81±1.48 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.09 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 8.04±2.49 | 6.77±0.26 | ||||
表3 饲粮类型、杂交组合及其互作对背最长肌营养成分和肉品质的影响
Table 3 Effects of diet types, hybrid combinations, and their interactions on nutrients and meat quality of dorsal longest muscle
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
| 粗脂肪Ether extract (EE,%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 2.55±0.30 | 2.33±0.94B | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 4.07±1.42 | 3.90±0.99A | ||||
| 粗蛋白质Crude protein (CP,%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 80.03±1.95A | 80.07±2.51A | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 68.94±1.41B | 70.73±5.77B | ||||
| 蒸煮损失Cooking loss (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 33.52±2.31 | 32.82±2.47 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.81 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 31.84±1.06 | 33.91±8.77 | ||||
| 滴水损失Drip loss (%) | 藏凉Zangliang | 2.76±0.31 | 2.48±0.14 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.97 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 2.65±0.08 | 2.39±0.26 | ||||
| 剪切力Shear force (N) | 藏凉Zangliang | 6.26±2.09 | 7.40±1.00 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.07 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 6.40±2.19 | 7.62±1.97 | ||||
| pH45min | 藏凉Zangliang | 6.41±0.20 | 6.58±0.09 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 0.19 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 6.06±0.40 | 6.35±0.35 | ||||
亮度 L* (0 h) | 藏凉Zangliang | 32.96±2.32 | 31.77±1.37 | 0.13 | 0.62 | 0.21 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 36.00±3.66 | 33.37±1.56 | ||||
红度 a* (0 h) | 藏凉Zangliang | 6.68±2.32 | 7.88±1.90 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.37 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 5.56±0.71 | 6.05±0.47 | ||||
黄度 b* (0 h) | 藏凉Zangliang | 7.93±1.01 | 5.81±1.48 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.09 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 8.04±2.49 | 6.77±0.26 | ||||
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
天冬氨酸 Aspartic acid* | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.73±0.69 | 2.92±0.47 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.92 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 2.40±0.26 | 3.74±2.38 | ||||
谷氨酸 Glutamate* | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.35±1.31A | 2.53±1.23 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.64 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 2.35±1.91B | 2.29±0.87 | ||||
甘氨酸 Glycine* | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.37±0.17 | 4.88±1.17 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.25 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 4.77±0.12 | 5.15±0.11 | ||||
精氨酸 Arginine | 藏凉Zangliang | 28.05±1.55Bb | 37.30±1.36a | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 35.83±0.35Ab | 40.41±0.91a | ||||
丙氨酸 Alanine* | 藏凉Zangliang | 8.64±2.62 | 10.12±2.21 | 0.85 | 0.51 | 0.87 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 9.26±4.85 | 10.18±0.89 | ||||
脯氨酸 Proline* | 藏凉Zangliang | 4.92±1.71 | 5.21±4.26 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.78 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 5.90±2.92 | 7.11±1.14 | ||||
酪氨酸 Tyrosine* | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.95±0.66 | 4.80±4.76 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.55±0.86 | 2.07±0.50 | ||||
亮氨酸 Leucine | 藏凉Zangliang | 32.61±5.52 | 36.04±7.92 | 0.38 | 0.76 | 0.11 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 26.82±1.06 | 32.53±6.60 | ||||
表4 饲粮类型、杂交组合及其互作对背最长肌氨基酸含量的影响
Table 4 Effects of diet types, hybrid combinations, and their interactions on amino acid content in dorsal longest muscle (%)
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
天冬氨酸 Aspartic acid* | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.73±0.69 | 2.92±0.47 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.92 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 2.40±0.26 | 3.74±2.38 | ||||
谷氨酸 Glutamate* | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.35±1.31A | 2.53±1.23 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.64 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 2.35±1.91B | 2.29±0.87 | ||||
甘氨酸 Glycine* | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.37±0.17 | 4.88±1.17 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.25 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 4.77±0.12 | 5.15±0.11 | ||||
精氨酸 Arginine | 藏凉Zangliang | 28.05±1.55Bb | 37.30±1.36a | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 35.83±0.35Ab | 40.41±0.91a | ||||
丙氨酸 Alanine* | 藏凉Zangliang | 8.64±2.62 | 10.12±2.21 | 0.85 | 0.51 | 0.87 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 9.26±4.85 | 10.18±0.89 | ||||
脯氨酸 Proline* | 藏凉Zangliang | 4.92±1.71 | 5.21±4.26 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.78 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 5.90±2.92 | 7.11±1.14 | ||||
酪氨酸 Tyrosine* | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.95±0.66 | 4.80±4.76 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.55±0.86 | 2.07±0.50 | ||||
亮氨酸 Leucine | 藏凉Zangliang | 32.61±5.52 | 36.04±7.92 | 0.38 | 0.76 | 0.11 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 26.82±1.06 | 32.53±6.60 | ||||
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
丁酸 C4:0* | 藏凉Zangliang | 8.77±2.89 | 9.94±4.91 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 9.92±6.69 | 11.61±7.57 | ||||
十五碳酸 C15:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.30±0.04 | 1.16±0.11 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.62 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.30±0.14 | 1.22±0.10 | ||||
十七碳酸 C17:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 24.56±1.67 | 22.62±0.85 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 24.48±1.45 | 22.63±0.46 | ||||
顺-10-十七碳一烯酸 C17:1n7 | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.74±0.79 | 3.12±0.52 | 0.96 | 0.39 | 0.40 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 3.45±0.50 | 3.44±0.53 | ||||
亚油酸 C18:2n6c* | 藏凉Zangliang | 10.86±1.17 | 11.68±1.68 | 0.27 | 0.90 | 0.26 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 12.32±0.41 | 11.66±0.24 | ||||
二十碳酸 C20:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 40.91±4.25 | 40.17±2.09 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 0.71 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 38.18±4.10 | 39.51±6.79 | ||||
α-亚麻酸 C18:3n6* | 藏凉Zangliang | 7.40±0.18 | 8.34±0.67 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 7.58±0.08 | 7.48±0.01 | ||||
二十二碳酸 C22:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.78±0.15 | 0.69±0.02A | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.67 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 0.59±0.09 | 0.55±0.07B | ||||
二十四碳酸 C24:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.95±0.40 | 0.90±0.05 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.38 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.48±0.01 | 1.16±0.34 | ||||
表5 饲粮类型、杂交组合及其互作对背最长肌脂肪酸含量的影响
Table 5 Effects of diet types, hybrid combinations, and their interactions on fatty acid content in dorsal longest muscle (%)
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
丁酸 C4:0* | 藏凉Zangliang | 8.77±2.89 | 9.94±4.91 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 9.92±6.69 | 11.61±7.57 | ||||
十五碳酸 C15:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.30±0.04 | 1.16±0.11 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.62 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.30±0.14 | 1.22±0.10 | ||||
十七碳酸 C17:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 24.56±1.67 | 22.62±0.85 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 24.48±1.45 | 22.63±0.46 | ||||
顺-10-十七碳一烯酸 C17:1n7 | 藏凉Zangliang | 3.74±0.79 | 3.12±0.52 | 0.96 | 0.39 | 0.40 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 3.45±0.50 | 3.44±0.53 | ||||
亚油酸 C18:2n6c* | 藏凉Zangliang | 10.86±1.17 | 11.68±1.68 | 0.27 | 0.90 | 0.26 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 12.32±0.41 | 11.66±0.24 | ||||
二十碳酸 C20:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 40.91±4.25 | 40.17±2.09 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 0.71 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 38.18±4.10 | 39.51±6.79 | ||||
α-亚麻酸 C18:3n6* | 藏凉Zangliang | 7.40±0.18 | 8.34±0.67 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 7.58±0.08 | 7.48±0.01 | ||||
二十二碳酸 C22:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.78±0.15 | 0.69±0.02A | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.67 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 0.59±0.09 | 0.55±0.07B | ||||
二十四碳酸 C24:0 | 藏凉Zangliang | 0.95±0.40 | 0.90±0.05 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.38 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.48±0.01 | 1.16±0.34 | ||||
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
MDA (nmol·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 14.29±0.85 | 13.30±2.49 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.52 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 14.21±1.36a | 12.50±1.51b | ||||
SOD (U·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 193.46±17.71 | 205.14±14.03 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.79 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 203.05±8.73 | 211.72±22.80 | ||||
TG (nmol·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.78±0.18 | 1.70±0.19 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.52 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.79±0.23 | 1.79±0.15 | ||||
GSH-Px (U·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 149.83±22.65 | 161.48±3.33B | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.89 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 166.61±10.35 | 176.93±14.06A | ||||
CAT (U·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 57.25±11.59 | 57.65±4.54 | 0.65 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 52.35±8.58 | 59.91±8.93 | ||||
ALP (U·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 1118.59±44.31 | 1155.60±74.50 | 0.73 | 0.30 | 0.92 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1133.04±172.30 | 1163.89±19.94 | ||||
BUN (nmol·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 9.59±0.52 | 8.76±1.90 | 0.47 | 0.07 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 9.29±1.03 | 8.41±1.53 | ||||
GLU (nmol·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 8.28±0.70A | 7.79±0.94 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 0.58 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 7.03±1.15B | 6.94±1.34 | ||||
TAOC (nmol·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.01±0.10Bb | 1.30±0.24a | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.13±0.29Ab | 1.39±0.11a | ||||
表6 饲粮类型、杂交组合及其互作对血清生化指标的影响
Table 6 Effects of diet types, hybrid combinations, and their interactions on serum biochemical indicators
项目 Item | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型Diet type | P值P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基础饲粮 Basic diet | 苜蓿饲粮 Alfalfa diet | 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 饲粮类型 Diet type | 杂交组合×饲粮类型 Hybrid combination×diet type | ||
MDA (nmol·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 14.29±0.85 | 13.30±2.49 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.52 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 14.21±1.36a | 12.50±1.51b | ||||
SOD (U·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 193.46±17.71 | 205.14±14.03 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.79 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 203.05±8.73 | 211.72±22.80 | ||||
TG (nmol·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.78±0.18 | 1.70±0.19 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.52 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.79±0.23 | 1.79±0.15 | ||||
GSH-Px (U·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 149.83±22.65 | 161.48±3.33B | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.89 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 166.61±10.35 | 176.93±14.06A | ||||
CAT (U·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 57.25±11.59 | 57.65±4.54 | 0.65 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 52.35±8.58 | 59.91±8.93 | ||||
ALP (U·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 1118.59±44.31 | 1155.60±74.50 | 0.73 | 0.30 | 0.92 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1133.04±172.30 | 1163.89±19.94 | ||||
BUN (nmol·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 9.59±0.52 | 8.76±1.90 | 0.47 | 0.07 | 0.95 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 9.29±1.03 | 8.41±1.53 | ||||
GLU (nmol·L-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 8.28±0.70A | 7.79±0.94 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 0.58 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 7.03±1.15B | 6.94±1.34 | ||||
TAOC (nmol·mL-1) | 藏凉Zangliang | 1.01±0.10Bb | 1.30±0.24a | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| 巴凉Baliang | 1.13±0.29Ab | 1.39±0.11a | ||||
| [1] | Yang H T, Liu X Q, Xiong L R. Research and application progress of milk replacer in ruminant production. Modern Animal Husbandry Science & Technology, 2023(9): 71-73. |
| 杨泓涛, 刘晓情, 熊璘然. 代乳料在反刍动物生产中的研究与应用进展. 现代畜牧科技, 2023(9): 71-73. | |
| [2] | Zeng Y Z. Feasibility of replacing animal protein sources with plant protein sources and their impact on the environment. Animal Industry and Environment, 2023(16): 13-14. |
| 曾永姿. 植物蛋白源替代动物蛋白源的可行性及其对环境的影响. 畜牧业环境, 2023(16): 13-14. | |
| [3] | Wu Z C. Study on dilemma and breakthrough path of feed grain supply in China. Feed Industry, 2025, 46(7): 168-173. |
| 吴珍彩. 中国饲料粮供给困境与突破路径研究. 饲料工业, 2025, 46(7): 168-173. | |
| [4] | Gao W J, Li Z, Shi H W, et al. Effects of single fiber component on net energy partition pattern in growing pigs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2025, 37(2): 868-878. |
| 高文君, 李哲, 师煌伟, 等. 单一纤维组分对生长猪净能分配规律的影响. 动物营养学报, 2025, 37(2): 868-878. | |
| [5] | Xu X W. Application of soybean meal reduction nutritional regulation technology in poultry production. Modern Animal Husbandry Science & Technology, 2025(2): 93-96. |
| 徐晓炜. 豆粕减量营养调控技术在家禽生产中的应用. 现代畜牧科技, 2025(2): 93-96. | |
| [6] | Liao S B. Discussion on the influencing factors of beef cattle breeding costs and cost reduction and efficiency improvement technologies. Animal Breeding and Feed, 2025, 24(2): 40-42. |
| 廖胜保. 肉牛养殖成本的影响因素与降本增效技术探讨. 养殖与饲料, 2025, 24(2): 40-42. | |
| [7] | Ding Z Z, Xiao C F, Xu Y Y, et al. Research progress on the application of alternative unconventional feed ingredients in poultry breeding. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2024, 40(5): 142-152. |
| 丁梓钊, 肖长峰, 许云英, 等. 替代性非常规饲料原料在家禽养殖中的应用研究进展.上海农业学报, 2024, 40(5): 142-152. | |
| [8] | Zhao M, Ren Y B, Du R P, et al. Effects of replacing soybean meal with milk thistle meal on growth performance, blood biochemical indexes, liver antioxidant indexes and metabolism related gene expression of lambs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2024, 36(4): 2524-2540. |
| 赵濛, 任彦博, 杜瑞平, 等. 水飞蓟粕替代豆粕对羔羊生长性能、血液生化指标及肝脏抗氧化指标和代谢相关基因表达的影响. 动物营养学报, 2024, 36(4): 2524-2540. | |
| [9] | Han B S, Zhou X Z, Meng J L. Analysis of the future development trends of China’s pig industry. Swine Industry Science, 2024, 41(9): 41-43. |
| 韩博森, 周勋章, 孟君丽. 我国生猪产业未来发展趋势分析. 猪业科学, 2024, 41(9): 41-43. | |
| [10] | Liu J M, Hu M J, Bi L G, et al. Analysis of silage quality of alfalfa and oat with different mixing ratios. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 61(4): 284-288. |
| 刘建民, 胡梦洁, 毕力格, 等.不同混合比例紫花苜蓿和燕麦的青贮品质分析.中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(4): 284-288. | |
| [11] | Huang X, Ma Y Y, Liu Y, et al. Feeding effects of granular alfalfa and fresh pasture partially replacing complete feed on Linwu ducks. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(3): 1159-1165. |
| 黄璇, 马玉勇, 刘洋, 等. 苜蓿草颗粒和鲜草部分替代全价饲料对临武鸭饲喂效果的比较研究. 中国畜牧兽医, 2025, 52(3): 1159-1165. | |
| [12] | Yang X, Ma J X, Huaungpu W K, et al. Effects of replacing soybean meal with alfalfa leaf meal on serum antioxidant level, immune function and reproductive performance of sows. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2023, 57(4): 615-622. |
| 杨旭, 马季祥, 皇甫卫康, 等. 苜蓿叶粉替代豆粕对母猪血清抗氧化水平、免疫功能及繁殖性能的影响. 河南农业大学学报, 2023, 57(4): 615-622. | |
| [13] | Ran Y. Effects of replacing partial corn and soybean meal with wheat bran or alfalfa pellets on growth performance and meat quality of finishing pigs. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2024. |
| 冉亿. 麸皮或苜蓿颗粒替代部分玉米及豆粕对育肥猪生长性能及肉品质的影响. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2024. | |
| [14] | Lv L Y, Yi X F, Pang T D, et al. Analysis of the feeding effect of fermented alfalfa on guike fattening pigs. Feed Research, 2022, 45(9): 27-30. |
| 吕玲燕, 易显凤, 庞天德, 等. 发酵苜蓿饲喂桂科育肥猪效果分析. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(9): 27-30. | |
| [15] | Yang W H. The investigation of Liangsan pig genetic resource and its conservation and exploitation. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2014. |
| 杨文瀚. 凉伞猪种质资源保护及开发利用的调查. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2014. | |
| [16] | Hu M L, Li J J, Li M Y, et al. The effect of alfalfa type low protein feed on the production performance and serum biochemistry of fattening pigs. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 61(4): 294-299. |
| 胡梦林, 李佳静, 李梦尧, 等. 苜蓿型低蛋白饲粮对育肥猪生产性能和血清生化的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(4): 294-299. | |
| [17] | Cheng J W, Zhang S H, Han Y, et al. Different levels of alfalfa leaf meal affect the in vitro fermentation products and microbiota composition of gestating sow feces. Pratacultural Science, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1069.s.20250108.1003.004.1-26. |
| 程佳雯, 张舒航, 韩尧, 等. 不同水平苜蓿叶粉对妊娠母猪粪便体外发酵产物和菌群组成的影响. 草业科学, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1069.s.20250108.1003.004.1-26. | |
| [18] | Zhou Y. Effect of dietary energy level on growth,finishing and slaughter performance and meat quality of donkeys. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020. |
| 周艳. 日粮能量水平对肉驴生长育肥性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响及其机理研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. | |
| [19] | National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China, State Food and Drug Administration. National standard for food safety-Determination of protein in foods, GB 5009.5-2016. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2016. |
| 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中蛋白质的测定, GB 5009.5-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. | |
| [20] | National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China, State Food and Drug Administration. National standard for food safety-Determination of fat in foods, GB 5009.6-2016. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2016. |
| 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中脂肪的测定, GB 5009.6-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. | |
| [21] | National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China, State Food and Drug Administration. National standard for food safety-Determination of amino acids in foods, GB 5009.124-2016. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2016. |
| 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中氨基酸的测定, GB 5009.124-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. | |
| [22] | National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China, State Food and Drug Administration. National standard for food safety-Determination of fatty acids in foods, GB 5009.168-2016. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2016. |
| 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中脂肪酸的测定, GB 5009.168-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. | |
| [23] | Messinger D, Weindl P A, Aulrich K, et al. Growth performance and carcass traits of growing pigs consuming different alfalfa (Medicago sativa) products in organic farming systems. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A—Animal Science, 2022, 71(1-4): 58-73. |
| [24] | Ma J X, Huangpu W K, Yang X, et al.“King of the forage”—Alfalfa supplementation improves growth, reproductive performance, health condition and meat quality of pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2022(9): 1025942. |
| [25] | Li Y, Ren L P, Yuan Y L, et al. The effects of alfalfa meal on growth performance, intestinal antioxidant indicators, and intestinal morphology of piglets. China Feed, 2024(6): 18-21. |
| 李颖, 任丽萍, 远永来. 苜蓿草粉对仔猪生长性能、肠道抗氧化指标和肠道形态结构的影响. 中国饲料, 2024(6): 18-21. | |
| [26] | Li J, Zhang S, Gu X, et al. Effects of alfalfa levels on carcass traits, meat quality, fatty acid composition, amino acid profile, and gut microflora composition of Heigai pigs. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2022(9): 975455. |
| [27] | Ding X R. Application of alfalfa reduction as a substitute for soybean meal in pig production. Swine Industry Science, 2024, 41(9): 72-74. |
| 丁欣蓉. 苜蓿减量替代豆粕日粮在猪生产中的应用. 猪业科学, 2024, 41(9): 72-74. | |
| [28] | Huang Q C, Wu Z Q, Lai J B, et al. Effects of Origanum vulgare L. extract on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 56(8): 150-153. |
| 黄其春, 吴樟强, 赖建彬, 等. 牛至提取物对生长育肥猪生长性能、胴体性状及肉品质的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2020, 56(8): 150-153. | |
| [29] | Wang Z H, Teng J S, Peng H C, et al. The effect of WL-525 alfalfa powder on the growth and development of Guike black pigs. Guangxi Journal of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 37(6): 243-245. |
| 王自豪, 滕军山, 彭宏春, 等. 紫花苜蓿 WL-525 草粉对桂科黑猪生长发育的影响. 广西畜牧兽医, 2021, 37(6): 243-245. | |
| [30] | Lindn P. Effect of dietary with alfalfa in pork. Animal Science, 2003, 3(10): 17-19. |
| [31] | Li B X, Zhao W M, Fu Y F, et al. Effects of alfalfa meal on growth rate, blood biochemical indexes and slaughter performance of Sushan pigs. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(11): 2675-2680. |
| 李碧侠, 赵为民, 付言峰, 等. 苜蓿草粉对苏山猪生长速度、血液生化指标及屠宰性能的影响. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(11): 2675-2680. | |
| [32] | Hui S Z, Yang H T, Kong X J, et al. The effect of alfalfa powder on the growth performance, slaughter performance, and serum biochemical indicators of Songliao black pigs. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018(4): 159-162. |
| 惠铄智, 杨海天, 孔祥杰, 等. 苜蓿草粉对松辽黑猪生长性能、屠宰性能及血清生化指标的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(4): 159-162. | |
| [33] | Lv X Z, Wang C Z, Qiu X D, et al. Effects of alfalfa meal on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes, carcass quality and economic benefit of finishing pigs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(5): 1693-1702. |
| 吕先召, 王成章, 邱晓东, 等. 苜蓿草粉对育肥猪生长性能、血清生化指标、胴体品质及经济效益的影响. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(5): 1693-1702. | |
| [34] | Zhao J. Studies on feed grain replaced by alfalfa meal in diet of finishing pigs and economic benefit analysis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2014. |
| 赵静. 苜蓿草粉替代育肥猪饲料粮生物学及经济学研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2014. | |
| [35] | Luo P H, Cao Y F, Luo L. Analysis of factors affecting pig fat deposition. Xinjiang Animal Husbandry, 2025, 41(1): 9-12. |
| 罗鹏辉, 曹玉凤, 罗兰. 影响猪脂肪沉积的因素分析. 新疆畜牧业, 2025, 41(1): 9-12. | |
| [36] | Jia J J, Lin Q, Zhang X M, et al. Effect of fermented alfalfa feed on meat quality of Taoyuan black pigs. Feed Industry, 2025, 46(4): 71-76. |
| 贾军杰, 林谦, 张晓明, 等. 苜蓿发酵饲料对桃源黑猪肉品质的影响研究. 饲料工业, 2025, 46(4): 71-76. | |
| [37] | Gao X. Studies on the effects of plant-derived polysaccharide on the metabolism of glucose and lipid and its application in fattening goats. Jinan: Shandong Agricultural University, 2024. |
| 高旭. 植物多糖调控糖脂代谢的组学机制及在育肥羊上的应用. 济南: 山东农业大学, 2024. | |
| [38] | Ma Y. Effects of different combination proportions of sophora alopecuroides and alfalfa on growth, immune indexes and intestinal microflora of meat rabbits. Tarim: Tarim University, 2024. |
| 马艳. 苦豆子与苜蓿不同组合比例对肉兔生长、免疫指标及肠道菌群的影响. 塔里木: 塔里木大学, 2024. | |
| [39] | Zhang D M. Effects of different forage on growth performance and environmental load of beef cattle. Animal Husbandry Environment, 2024(7): 24-25. |
| 张德敏. 不同饲草料对肉牛生长性能及环境负荷的影响. 畜牧业环境, 2024(7): 24-25. | |
| [40] | Jiang H, Wang H R, Wang H S, et al. Effects of alfalfa grass powder on carcass traits, meat quality, amino acids and fatty acids in the muscles of fattening pigs. China Feed, 2023(4): 57-62. |
| 蒋恒, 王昊然, 王怀树, 等. 苜蓿草粉对育肥猪胴体性状、肉品质以及肌肉中氨基酸、脂肪酸的影响. 中国饲料, 2023(4): 57-62. | |
| [41] | Wang Q S. Effects of alfalfa on growth performance, carcass and meat quality of Cong Jiang pigs. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2019. |
| 王庆师. 紫花苜蓿对从江香猪生长性能、胴体品质及肉质的影响研究. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019. | |
| [42] | Yang Y B, Yi X F, Deng S Y, et al. Study on effect of feeding Jinling chickens with fermented alfalfa. Feed Research, 2022, 45(19): 40-46. |
| 杨莹博, 易显凤, 邓素媛, 等. 日粮添加发酵紫花苜蓿饲喂金陵花鸡的效果研究. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19): 40-46. | |
| [43] | Yu H N. Mechanical exploration of leucine deprivation modulating hepatic lipid metabolism. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2023. |
| 余灏南. 亮氨酸缺失对肝脏脂质代谢的调节功能研究. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2023. | |
| [44] | Yang B, Ma Y X, Shen S B. Rethinking of using lipids in feed industry. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(11): 4901-4908. |
| 杨博, 马永喜, 沈水宝. 脂类在饲料行业中应用的新思考. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(11): 4901-4908. | |
| [45] | Wang J W, Qin C F, He T, et al. Alfalfa-containing diets alter luminal microbiota structure and short chain fatty acid sensing in the caecal mucosa of pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2018(1): 11. |
| [46] | Xu J Y, Liu X, Geng H M, et al. Alfalfa silage diet improves meat quality by remodeling the intestinal microbes of fattening pigs. Foods, 2023, 12(17): 3209. |
| [47] | Xiao J X, Tian J, Lu G C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forage provision on the serum biochemical indicators, behavior and health of dairy calves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2025, 73(11): 6333-6344. |
| [48] | Zhao H W, Hua J L, Lu W W, et al. Effects of increasing levels of rubber seed cake on growth performance, nutrient digestion metabolism, serum biochemical parameters, and rumen microbiota of Hu sheep. BMC Veterinary Research, 2025, 21(1): 52. |
| [49] | Guo M, Wang Z C, Gao Z M, et al. Alfalfa leaf meal as a new protein feedstuff improves meat quality by modulating lipid metabolism and antioxidant capacity of finishing pigs. Food Chemistry: X, 2023(19): 100815. |
| [50] | Zhang X, Guo X S, Li F H, et al. Antioxidant, flavonoid, α-tocopherol, β-carotene, fatty acids, and fermentation profiles of alfalfa silage inoculated with novel lactiplantibacillus plantarum and pediococcus acidilactici strains with high-antioxidant activity. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2022(288): 115301. |
| [51] | Tang M H. Effects of catalase supplementation in diet on oxidative stress and its mechanism in yellow broilers. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2022. |
| 唐明红. 日粮中添加过氧化酶对黄羽肉鸡氧化应激的影响及其作用机制研究. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2022. | |
| [52] | Nakanishi T, Uchiyama T, Uchida M, et al. Ante-mortem glutathione peroxidase 4 inhibition by RSL3 affects post-mortem meat quality in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 2024, 66(2): 1-9. |
| [53] | Wüstholz J, Carrasco S, Berger U, et al. Fattening and slaughtering performance of growing pigs consuming high levels of alfalfa silage (Medicago sativa) in organic pig production. Livestock Science, 2017(200): 46-52. |
| [54] | Lu F J, Hao T, Liu Q Y, et al. Analysis of carcass performance and meat quality of Berkshire pig, Tibetan pig, and Berkshire hybrid pig. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2024, 60(1): 240-243, 392. |
| 鹿富俊, 郝桐, 刘庆雨, 等. 巴克夏猪、藏猪和巴藏杂交猪的胴体性能及肉品质分析.中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60(1): 240-243, 392. | |
| [55] | Zhu J H, Shen J N, Yin X D, et al. Heterosis formation mechanism, prediction methods, and their application and prospect in pig production. Hereditas (Beijing) , 2024, 46(8): 627-639. |
| 朱家华, 沈俊男, 伊旭东, 等. 杂种优势形成机制和预测方法及其在猪生产中的应用与展望. 遗传, 2024, 46(8): 627-639. | |
| [56] | Yang F M, Li R X, Zhu A S, et al. A comparative study on the hybrid combination of foreign, indegenous, and breeding pigs. Modern Animal Husbandry Science & Technology, 2023(8): 7-11. |
| 杨凤鸣, 李瑞玺, 朱石安, 等. 外种猪与地方猪、培育猪杂交组合对比试验研究报告. 现代畜牧科技, 2023(8): 7-11. | |
| [57] | Ma Y F, Han X M, Huang C P, et al. Population genomics analysis revealed origin and high-altitude adaptation of Tibetan pigs. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 11463. |
| [58] | Liu Q Y, Yu Y S, Zhang Q, et al. Comparative study on carcass performance and meat quality of tibetan and Du Tibetan hybrid pigs. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 61(5): 153-156. |
| 刘庆雨, 于永生, 张琪, 等.藏猪及杜藏杂交猪胴体性能及肉质品质对比研究.中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(5): 153-156. | |
| [59] | Qi K K, Men X M, Wu J X, et al. Rearing pattern alters porcine myofiber type, fat deposition, associated microbial communities and functional capacity. BMC microbiology, 2019, 19(1): 181. |
| [60] | Guan W W. The effect of different feed on slaughter traits and pork quality of Dongjian binary and ternary hybrid pigs. Swine Industry Science, 2025, 42(2): 121-123. |
| 关伟伟. 不同饲料对东串二元和三元杂交组合猪屠宰性状和猪肉品质的影响. 猪业科学, 2025, 42(2): 121-123. |
| [1] | 占今舜, 江浩筠, 贾浩滨, 王海波, 谷志勇, 潘月, 钟小军, 霍俊宏. 不同杂交组合绵羊生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃发酵的比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(4): 197-210. |
| [2] | 姚东旭, 王彩忠, 郑琛. 猫尾草对幼龄肉兔生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(3): 185-194. |
| [3] | 张敏, 杨锐, 黄逸州, 林芷昕, 郑贤跃, 刘庆华, 高玉云, 林冬梅, 林占熺, 金灵. 巨菌草对育肥从江香猪生长性能及肠道健康的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 171-188. |
| [4] | 祁帅, 张艳丽, 万永杰, 牛伟强, 张积鑫, 高雪, 茆达干. 菌酶协同发酵豆秸对湖羊生长性能、血清指标和瘤胃微生物的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 189-201. |
| [5] | 靳生伟, 韩银仓, 孙永刚, 丁维芹, 刘亚倩, 祁增源, 周建强. 冷季不同饲养方式对牦牛生长性能及血液生理生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(1): 215-225. |
| [6] | 苏东遥, 李永亮, 董晴, 赵心念, 李晓宇, 金晓东, 王亚男, 田树军, 高玉红, 孙新胜. 发酵床对哺乳期湖羔羊生长、消化以及血液理化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 86-97. |
| [7] | 申迪, 曾子铭, 庞凯悦, 柴沙驼, 聂洪辛, 李毓敏, 廖扬, 王迅, 黄伟华, 刘书杰, 杨英魁, 王书祥. 低精料日粮和高精料日粮对牦牛生长性能和瘤胃菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 155-165. |
| [8] | 张瑞, 安雪姣, 李建烨, 卢曾奎, 牛春娥, 徐振飞, 张金霞, 耿智广, 岳耀敬, 杨博辉. 湖羊及其不同杂交组合生长性能、产肉性能及肌肉品质比较分析[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(3): 186-197. |
| [9] | 张峰硕, 季秋蓉, 何婷莉, 苏曲杨昂毛, 王志有, 侯生珍, 桂林生. 低蛋白日粮中不同比例氨基酸对藏羊背腰最长肌肉品质、氨基酸和脂肪酸组成以及维生素和矿物质含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(3): 198-208. |
| [10] | 彭超, 李自健, 王虎成, 冯强, 沈禹颖. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区放牧补饲和舍饲肉羊的屠宰与肉质性能比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(2): 140-147. |
| [11] | 杨乾龙, 魏倩倩, 赵德辉, 郭肖兰, 张铁涛, 王晓旭, 鲍坤, 王凯英. 饲粮添加过瘤胃半胱氨酸对育成期梅花鹿生长性能、营养物质表观消化率和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(2): 148-159. |
| [12] | 刘孟君, 任越. 放牧条件下萨福克与河谷型藏绵羊杂交F1代不同部位肌肉营养品质分析[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(11): 140-154. |
| [13] | 王钊, 刘静, 于昊, 李鹏, 牛伟强, 万永杰, 张艳丽, 茆达干. 日粮添加蚕豆皮对湖羊生长性能、屠宰性能、器官发育和肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(10): 162-172. |
| [14] | 张耀, 黄小云, 陈鑫珠, 黄勤楼, 黄秀声, 韩海东. 海鲜菇菌糠发酵饲料对山羊屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(9): 195-205. |
| [15] | 王循刚, 张晓玲, 徐田伟, 耿远月, 胡林勇, 赵娜, 刘宏金, 康生萍, 徐世晓. 饲粮蛋白质水平对藏系绵羊瘤胃真菌菌群结构及功能的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 182-191. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||