草业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 197-210.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025191
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
占今舜1(
), 江浩筠1, 贾浩滨1, 王海波1,2, 谷志勇1,3, 潘月1,3, 钟小军1, 霍俊宏1(
)
收稿日期:2025-05-12
修回日期:2025-08-07
出版日期:2026-04-20
发布日期:2026-02-07
通讯作者:
霍俊宏
作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: hjh_0222@126.com基金资助:
Jin-shun ZHAN1(
), Hao-yun JIANG1, Hao-bin JIA1, Hai-bo WANG1,2, Zhi-yong GU1,3, Yue PAN1,3, Xiao-jun ZHONG1, Jun-hong HUO1(
)
Received:2025-05-12
Revised:2025-08-07
Online:2026-04-20
Published:2026-02-07
Contact:
Jun-hong HUO
摘要:
本研究旨在开展不同杂交组合绵羊生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃发酵的比较研究,挑选健康且出生日期相近的湖羊×湖羊后代(HH)、杜泊羊×湖羊杂交F1代(DH)、澳洲白×湖羊杂交F1代(AH)和夏洛莱羊×湖羊杂交F1代(XH)公母羔羊各10只,测定不同品种绵羊的生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃发酵参数。结果表明: 1)HH组母羊的产羔率高于杂交组母羊,而杂交羊羔羊断奶成活率则高于HH羔羊。2)品种主效应分析发现,AH、DH和XH羔羊的1、30、90、180和360日龄体重以及30~90日龄、1~90日龄、1~180日龄和1~360日龄平均日增重均显著高于HH羊(P<0.01)。性别主效应分析发现,公羊90、180和360日龄体重以及除180~360日龄外的平均日增重均显著高于母羊(P<0.01)。品种与性别互作分析发现,AH羊1日龄体重显著高于其他品种羊(P<0.05),180日龄DH和AH公母羊的体重均显著高于HH公母羊(P<0.05)。3)品种主效应分析发现,AH和DH羊30~360日龄的体高以及90、180日龄的体长均显著高于HH和XH羊(P<0.01),而30日龄的体长则相反;HH羊1~360日龄胸围和管围显著低于杂交羊(P<0.01)。性别主效应分析发现,公羊180日龄体长、体高、胸围和管围均显著高于母羊(P<0.01)。4)性别主效应分析发现,公羊的血清总胆固醇(TC)含量显著高于母羊(P<0.05);品种和性别互作分析发现,HH公羊和AH母羊的血清谷丙转氨酶(ALT)含量显著高于其他羊(P<0.01)。品种主效应分析发现,HH羊白蛋白(ALB)、总蛋白(TP)和肌酐(CRE)含量显著低于其他品种羊(P<0.01),其中XH羊血清中含量最高。XH羊血清的尿素氮(BUN)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)含量显著高于HH羊,而谷草转氨酶(AST)含量则显著低于DH羊(P<0.05)。XH和HH羊血清血糖(GLU)含量显著高于AH和DH羊(P<0.01),其他指标各品种羊之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。5)品种为主效应时分析发现,DH和XH羊乙酸、丁酸、戊酸、总挥发性脂肪酸和氨态氮含量均显著高于HH羊(P<0.05);XH羊异戊酸含量显著高于DH和AH羊,而戊酸含量则相反(P<0.01)。品种与性别互作分析发现,XH母羊异丁酸和异戊酸含量显著高于AH和DH母羊(P<0.05)。综上所述,在本试验中湖羊与澳洲白、杜泊羊和夏洛莱羊杂交后母羊的产羔率有所下降,但杂交羊羔羊成活率有所提高;杂交羊的生长发育优于纯种湖羊,这可能与其瘤胃发酵提升有关。
占今舜, 江浩筠, 贾浩滨, 王海波, 谷志勇, 潘月, 钟小军, 霍俊宏. 不同杂交组合绵羊生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃发酵的比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(4): 197-210.
Jin-shun ZHAN, Hao-yun JIANG, Hao-bin JIA, Hai-bo WANG, Zhi-yong GU, Yue PAN, Xiao-jun ZHONG, Jun-hong HUO. A comparative study of the growth rate, blood biochemical indexes and rumen fermentation of hybrid sheep from different breed combinations[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 197-210.
| 项目Item | HH | AH | DH | XH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配种母羊数Number of mating ewes | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| 发情率Estrus rate (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 受胎率Pregnancy rate (%) | 96.67 | 93.33 | 96.67 | 96.67 |
| 产羔数Number of newborn lambs | 64 | 52 | 54 | 57 |
| 产羔率Lambing rate (%) | 220.69 | 185.71 | 186.21 | 196.55 |
| 断奶羔羊数Number of weaned lambs | 58 | 50 | 53 | 57 |
| 断奶成活率Weaning survival rate of lamb (%) | 90.63 | 96.15 | 98.15 | 100.00 |
表1 不同杂交组合母羊的繁殖性能
Table 1 Reproductive performance of ewes in different cross combinations
| 项目Item | HH | AH | DH | XH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配种母羊数Number of mating ewes | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| 发情率Estrus rate (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 受胎率Pregnancy rate (%) | 96.67 | 93.33 | 96.67 | 96.67 |
| 产羔数Number of newborn lambs | 64 | 52 | 54 | 57 |
| 产羔率Lambing rate (%) | 220.69 | 185.71 | 186.21 | 196.55 |
| 断奶羔羊数Number of weaned lambs | 58 | 50 | 53 | 57 |
| 断奶成活率Weaning survival rate of lamb (%) | 90.63 | 96.15 | 98.15 | 100.00 |
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 3.32±0.14d | 9.87±1.06bcd | 14.78±2.49 | 17.07±2.97b | 30.79±1.80e | 44.75±3.49 | |
| 母Female | 3.53±0.44cd | 9.26±1.40d | 13.63±1.52 | 14.78±2.15b | 27.32±1.51f | 41.70±4.33 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 3.55±0.55cd | 10.75±1.34abcd | 15.00±2.67 | 27.70±2.85ab | 49.48±3.34b | 53.30±3.14 | |
| 母Female | 4.23±0.42b | 11.21±1.67ab | 15.51±2.92 | 25.91±2.02ab | 42.21±2.48c | 47.99±6.18 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 4.02±0.63bc | 11.30±1.79ab | 15.09±3.00 | 31.89±3.65a | 52.73±2.49a | 59.30±4.61 | |
| 母Female | 3.81±0.40bcd | 9.48±0.92cd | 14.91±2.20 | 26.16±2.95ab | 43.18±3.11c | 49.39±4.15 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 5.12±0.97a | 11.69±2.70a | 18.03±1.77 | 28.22±5.31ab | 38.62±6.26d | 54.22±6.41 | |
| 母Female | 4.86±0.63a | 10.96±1.56abc | 17.15±1.77 | 25.22±2.04b | 33.09±2.84e | 46.11±3.29 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 3.43±0.34c | 9.56±1.25b | 14.20±2.09b | 15.92±2.89c | 29.05±2.40d | 43.22±4.14c |
| AH | 3.89±0.59b | 10.98±1.49a | 15.26±2.74b | 26.81±2.57b | 45.84±4.70b | 50.65±5.49b | ||
| DH | 3.91±0.52b | 10.39±1.67ab | 15.00±2.57b | 29.03±4.37a | 47.95±5.61a | 54.35±6.64a | ||
| XH | 4.99±0.81a | 11.32±2.18a | 17.59±1.78a | 26.72±4.21b | 35.85±5.52c | 50.16±6.48b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 4.00±0.94 | 10.90±1.89 | 15.73±2.78 | 26.22±6.69a | 42.90±9.59a | 52.89±6.89a | |
| 母Female | 4.11±0.69 | 10.23±1.62 | 15.30±2.45 | 23.02±5.35b | 36.45±7.10b | 46.30±5.31b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.415 | 0.069 | 0.420 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.038 | 0.007 | 0.678 | <0.001 | 0.032 | 0.100 | ||
表2 不同杂交组合绵羊不同阶段体重的比较
Table 2 Comparison of body weight of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (kg)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 3.32±0.14d | 9.87±1.06bcd | 14.78±2.49 | 17.07±2.97b | 30.79±1.80e | 44.75±3.49 | |
| 母Female | 3.53±0.44cd | 9.26±1.40d | 13.63±1.52 | 14.78±2.15b | 27.32±1.51f | 41.70±4.33 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 3.55±0.55cd | 10.75±1.34abcd | 15.00±2.67 | 27.70±2.85ab | 49.48±3.34b | 53.30±3.14 | |
| 母Female | 4.23±0.42b | 11.21±1.67ab | 15.51±2.92 | 25.91±2.02ab | 42.21±2.48c | 47.99±6.18 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 4.02±0.63bc | 11.30±1.79ab | 15.09±3.00 | 31.89±3.65a | 52.73±2.49a | 59.30±4.61 | |
| 母Female | 3.81±0.40bcd | 9.48±0.92cd | 14.91±2.20 | 26.16±2.95ab | 43.18±3.11c | 49.39±4.15 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 5.12±0.97a | 11.69±2.70a | 18.03±1.77 | 28.22±5.31ab | 38.62±6.26d | 54.22±6.41 | |
| 母Female | 4.86±0.63a | 10.96±1.56abc | 17.15±1.77 | 25.22±2.04b | 33.09±2.84e | 46.11±3.29 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 3.43±0.34c | 9.56±1.25b | 14.20±2.09b | 15.92±2.89c | 29.05±2.40d | 43.22±4.14c |
| AH | 3.89±0.59b | 10.98±1.49a | 15.26±2.74b | 26.81±2.57b | 45.84±4.70b | 50.65±5.49b | ||
| DH | 3.91±0.52b | 10.39±1.67ab | 15.00±2.57b | 29.03±4.37a | 47.95±5.61a | 54.35±6.64a | ||
| XH | 4.99±0.81a | 11.32±2.18a | 17.59±1.78a | 26.72±4.21b | 35.85±5.52c | 50.16±6.48b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 4.00±0.94 | 10.90±1.89 | 15.73±2.78 | 26.22±6.69a | 42.90±9.59a | 52.89±6.89a | |
| 母Female | 4.11±0.69 | 10.23±1.62 | 15.30±2.45 | 23.02±5.35b | 36.45±7.10b | 46.30±5.31b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.415 | 0.069 | 0.420 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.038 | 0.007 | 0.678 | <0.001 | 0.032 | 0.100 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1~30 d | 30~90 d | 90~180 d | 180~360 d | 1~90 d | 1~180 d | 1~360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 0.22±0.03 | 0.12±0.04 | 0.15±0.02 | 0.08±0.02 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.14±0.03 | 0.08±0.03 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 0.24±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.24±0.05 | 0.02±0.02 | 0.27±0.03 | 0.26±0.02 | 0.12±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.23±0.05 | 0.25±0.04 | 0.18±0.03 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.24±0.02 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.14±0.01 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 0.24±0.07 | 0.34±0.07 | 0.23±0.05 | 0.04±0.03 | 0.31±0.04 | 0.27±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.03±0.02 | 0.25±0.03 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.13±0.01 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 0.22±0.07 | 0.28±0.06 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.26±0.06 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.14±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.04 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.09±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.23±0.02 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 0.20±0.04 | 0.11±0.04c | 0.15±0.03b | 0.08±0.02a | 0.14±0.03c | 0.14±0.01d | 0.11±0.01c |
| AH | 0.24±0.05 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.21±0.05a | 0.03±0.03b | 0.25±0.03b | 0.23±0.03b | 0.13±0.02b | ||
| DH | 0.22±0.06 | 0.31±0.07a | 0.21±0.05a | 0.04±0.03b | 0.28±0.05a | 0.24±0.03a | 0.14±0.02a | ||
| XH | 0.21±0.06 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.10±0.02c | 0.08±0.03a | 0.24±0.05b | 0.17±0.03c | 0.13±0.02b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 0.23±0.06a | 0.26±0.10a | 0.19±0.07a | 0.06±0.04 | 0.25±0.07a | 0.22±0.05a | 0.14±0.02a | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.05b | 0.21±0.08b | 0.15±0.05b | 0.05±0.03 | 0.21±0.06b | 0.18±0.04b | 0.12±0.01b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.232 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.026 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.892 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.493 | 0.655 | 0.164 | 0.503 | 0.356 | 0.117 | 0.156 | ||
表3 不同杂交组合绵羊不同阶段平均日增重的比较
Table 3 Comparison of average daily gain of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (kg)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1~30 d | 30~90 d | 90~180 d | 180~360 d | 1~90 d | 1~180 d | 1~360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 0.22±0.03 | 0.12±0.04 | 0.15±0.02 | 0.08±0.02 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.14±0.03 | 0.08±0.03 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 0.24±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.24±0.05 | 0.02±0.02 | 0.27±0.03 | 0.26±0.02 | 0.12±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.23±0.05 | 0.25±0.04 | 0.18±0.03 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.24±0.02 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.14±0.01 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 0.24±0.07 | 0.34±0.07 | 0.23±0.05 | 0.04±0.03 | 0.31±0.04 | 0.27±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.03±0.02 | 0.25±0.03 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.13±0.01 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 0.22±0.07 | 0.28±0.06 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.26±0.06 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.14±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.04 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.09±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.23±0.02 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 0.20±0.04 | 0.11±0.04c | 0.15±0.03b | 0.08±0.02a | 0.14±0.03c | 0.14±0.01d | 0.11±0.01c |
| AH | 0.24±0.05 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.21±0.05a | 0.03±0.03b | 0.25±0.03b | 0.23±0.03b | 0.13±0.02b | ||
| DH | 0.22±0.06 | 0.31±0.07a | 0.21±0.05a | 0.04±0.03b | 0.28±0.05a | 0.24±0.03a | 0.14±0.02a | ||
| XH | 0.21±0.06 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.10±0.02c | 0.08±0.03a | 0.24±0.05b | 0.17±0.03c | 0.13±0.02b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 0.23±0.06a | 0.26±0.10a | 0.19±0.07a | 0.06±0.04 | 0.25±0.07a | 0.22±0.05a | 0.14±0.02a | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.05b | 0.21±0.08b | 0.15±0.05b | 0.05±0.03 | 0.21±0.06b | 0.18±0.04b | 0.12±0.01b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.232 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.026 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.892 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.493 | 0.655 | 0.164 | 0.503 | 0.356 | 0.117 | 0.156 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 28.84±1.82c | 42.97±3.31 | 47.81±2.91 | 55.14±3.94 | 61.14±4.11 | 69.70±4.59 | |
| 母Female | 32.86±2.18ab | 40.50±4.24 | 46.02±4.05 | 53.34±3.32 | 58.11±2.10 | 67.96±5.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 30.52±2.13bc | 44.63±3.93 | 50.10±3.53 | 59.47±2.88 | 70.83±3.51 | 74.24±3.69 | |
| 母Female | 31.92±2.39b | 44.70±3.26 | 50.60±3.58 | 61.42±3.17 | 64.92±2.68 | 73.46±3.78 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 32.30±1.99ab | 43.95±4.61 | 50.46±3.25 | 60.97±5.30 | 71.65±3.74 | 78.76±3.82 | |
| 母Female | 31.85±2.43b | 43.78±1.33 | 49.90±3.99 | 61.36±2.51 | 65.06±0.87 | 72.46±3.53 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 32.92±3.68ab | 40.80±2.24 | 47.65±2.70 | 53.55±5.17 | 63.07±5.96 | 66.10±4.94 | |
| 母Female | 34.52±2.75a | 40.78±2.78 | 47.15±1.12 | 56.04±3.81 | 61.16±2.55 | 65.53±1.75 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 30.85±2.84b | 41.73±3.91b | 46.92±3.55b | 54.24±3.66b | 59.63±3.54b | 68.83±5.00b |
| AH | 31.22±2.32b | 44.66±3.51a | 50.35±3.47a | 60.45±3.11a | 67.88±4.29a | 73.85±3.66a | ||
| DH | 32.08±2.17ab | 43.87±3.31a | 50.18±3.56a | 61.17±4.04a | 68.35±4.29a | 75.61±4.82a | ||
| XH | 33.72±3.26a | 40.79±2.46b | 47.40±2.03b | 54.80±4.60b | 62.12±4.57b | 65.82±3.62c | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 31.15±2.91b | 43.09±3.78 | 49.01±3.26 | 57.28±5.25 | 66.67±6.33a | 72.20±6.34a | |
| 母Female | 32.79±2.59a | 42.44±3.50 | 48.42±3.79 | 58.04±4.70 | 62.31±3.59b | 69.85±4.96b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.004 | 0.394 | 0.394 | 0.385 | <0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.049 | 0.584 | 0.584 | 0.305 | 0.112 | 0.100 | ||
表4 不同杂交组合绵羊不同日龄体高的比较
Table 4 Comparison of body height of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 28.84±1.82c | 42.97±3.31 | 47.81±2.91 | 55.14±3.94 | 61.14±4.11 | 69.70±4.59 | |
| 母Female | 32.86±2.18ab | 40.50±4.24 | 46.02±4.05 | 53.34±3.32 | 58.11±2.10 | 67.96±5.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 30.52±2.13bc | 44.63±3.93 | 50.10±3.53 | 59.47±2.88 | 70.83±3.51 | 74.24±3.69 | |
| 母Female | 31.92±2.39b | 44.70±3.26 | 50.60±3.58 | 61.42±3.17 | 64.92±2.68 | 73.46±3.78 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 32.30±1.99ab | 43.95±4.61 | 50.46±3.25 | 60.97±5.30 | 71.65±3.74 | 78.76±3.82 | |
| 母Female | 31.85±2.43b | 43.78±1.33 | 49.90±3.99 | 61.36±2.51 | 65.06±0.87 | 72.46±3.53 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 32.92±3.68ab | 40.80±2.24 | 47.65±2.70 | 53.55±5.17 | 63.07±5.96 | 66.10±4.94 | |
| 母Female | 34.52±2.75a | 40.78±2.78 | 47.15±1.12 | 56.04±3.81 | 61.16±2.55 | 65.53±1.75 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 30.85±2.84b | 41.73±3.91b | 46.92±3.55b | 54.24±3.66b | 59.63±3.54b | 68.83±5.00b |
| AH | 31.22±2.32b | 44.66±3.51a | 50.35±3.47a | 60.45±3.11a | 67.88±4.29a | 73.85±3.66a | ||
| DH | 32.08±2.17ab | 43.87±3.31a | 50.18±3.56a | 61.17±4.04a | 68.35±4.29a | 75.61±4.82a | ||
| XH | 33.72±3.26a | 40.79±2.46b | 47.40±2.03b | 54.80±4.60b | 62.12±4.57b | 65.82±3.62c | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 31.15±2.91b | 43.09±3.78 | 49.01±3.26 | 57.28±5.25 | 66.67±6.33a | 72.20±6.34a | |
| 母Female | 32.79±2.59a | 42.44±3.50 | 48.42±3.79 | 58.04±4.70 | 62.31±3.59b | 69.85±4.96b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.004 | 0.394 | 0.394 | 0.385 | <0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.049 | 0.584 | 0.584 | 0.305 | 0.112 | 0.100 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 39.20±1.46ab | 48.87±1.02 | 51.98±2.02 | 56.38±2.69 | 64.07±1.40 | 75.41±3.25 | |
| 母Female | 38.46±2.11bc | 45.75±2.22 | 48.96±2.60 | 53.58±3.06 | 58.96±2.31 | 73.09±3.29 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 37.15±2.13bcd | 45.21±3.29 | 51.48±2.32 | 58.66±2.10 | 68.74±2.29 | 77.00±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 38.43±1.28bc | 45.37±2.72 | 49.45±2.02 | 57.67±2.78 | 66.30±2.39 | 71.51±1.71 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.95±2.71d | 44.65±3.29 | 49.00±3.61 | 60.14±5.12 | 67.50±2.97 | 76.19±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 36.95±2.31cd | 44.50±2.91 | 51.30±2.59 | 57.31±4.19 | 66.10±3.47 | 72.01±3.20 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.61±1.70a | 47.94±2.37 | 53.00±2.15 | 58.40±5.87 | 64.13±3.54 | 75.00±3.02 | |
| 母Female | 37.73±2.64bcd | 47.97±2.76 | 50.83±1.86 | 59.58±3.23 | 62.97±1.80 | 72.58±1.37 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 38.83±1.81a | 47.31±2.32a | 50.47±2.75 | 54.98±3.15b | 61.52±3.21c | 74.25±3.40 |
| AH | 37.79±1.84ab | 45.29±2.94b | 50.47±2.36 | 58.17±2.45a | 67.52±2.60a | 74.26±3.52 | ||
| DH | 36.45±2.51b | 44.57±3.02b | 50.15±3.28 | 58.73±4.78a | 66.80±3.23a | 74.10±3.53 | ||
| XH | 39.17±2.62a | 47.96±2.50a | 51.92±2.25 | 58.99±4.65a | 63.55±2.80b | 73.79±2.60 | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 38.23±2.69 | 46.67±3.13 | 51.37±2.91a | 58.40±4.31 | 66.11±3.31a | 75.90±2.85a | |
| 母Female | 37.89±2.16 | 45.90±2.87 | 50.14±2.41b | 57.04±3.90 | 63.58±3.90b | 72.30±2.52b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.168 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.942 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.447 | 0.199 | 0.043 | 0.117 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.009 | 0.165 | 0.111 | 0.306 | 0.077 | 0.201 | ||
表5 不同杂交组合绵羊不同日龄体长的比较
Table 5 Comparison of body length of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 39.20±1.46ab | 48.87±1.02 | 51.98±2.02 | 56.38±2.69 | 64.07±1.40 | 75.41±3.25 | |
| 母Female | 38.46±2.11bc | 45.75±2.22 | 48.96±2.60 | 53.58±3.06 | 58.96±2.31 | 73.09±3.29 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 37.15±2.13bcd | 45.21±3.29 | 51.48±2.32 | 58.66±2.10 | 68.74±2.29 | 77.00±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 38.43±1.28bc | 45.37±2.72 | 49.45±2.02 | 57.67±2.78 | 66.30±2.39 | 71.51±1.71 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.95±2.71d | 44.65±3.29 | 49.00±3.61 | 60.14±5.12 | 67.50±2.97 | 76.19±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 36.95±2.31cd | 44.50±2.91 | 51.30±2.59 | 57.31±4.19 | 66.10±3.47 | 72.01±3.20 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.61±1.70a | 47.94±2.37 | 53.00±2.15 | 58.40±5.87 | 64.13±3.54 | 75.00±3.02 | |
| 母Female | 37.73±2.64bcd | 47.97±2.76 | 50.83±1.86 | 59.58±3.23 | 62.97±1.80 | 72.58±1.37 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 38.83±1.81a | 47.31±2.32a | 50.47±2.75 | 54.98±3.15b | 61.52±3.21c | 74.25±3.40 |
| AH | 37.79±1.84ab | 45.29±2.94b | 50.47±2.36 | 58.17±2.45a | 67.52±2.60a | 74.26±3.52 | ||
| DH | 36.45±2.51b | 44.57±3.02b | 50.15±3.28 | 58.73±4.78a | 66.80±3.23a | 74.10±3.53 | ||
| XH | 39.17±2.62a | 47.96±2.50a | 51.92±2.25 | 58.99±4.65a | 63.55±2.80b | 73.79±2.60 | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 38.23±2.69 | 46.67±3.13 | 51.37±2.91a | 58.40±4.31 | 66.11±3.31a | 75.90±2.85a | |
| 母Female | 37.89±2.16 | 45.90±2.87 | 50.14±2.41b | 57.04±3.90 | 63.58±3.90b | 72.30±2.52b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.168 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.942 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.447 | 0.199 | 0.043 | 0.117 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.009 | 0.165 | 0.111 | 0.306 | 0.077 | 0.201 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 33.43±1.54 | 45.96±2.58 | 53.48±4.09 | 56.94±3.80 | 68.84±2.08 | 82.59±3.29 | |
| 母Female | 34.18±2.39 | 45.68±2.73 | 52.38±2.60 | 52.94±3.93 | 66.51±2.22 | 81.72±3.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 35.06±2.02 | 48.17±3.15 | 57.45±3.51 | 71.14±3.74 | 84.50±3.22 | 87.10±3.84 | |
| 母Female | 37.23±2.09 | 51.37±5.06 | 58.81±3.70 | 70.29±4.44 | 80.11±3.21 | 84.53±2.23 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.86±2.47 | 51.11±3.18 | 56.53±4.13 | 74.69±6.59 | 84.81±3.03 | 88.67±3.07 | |
| 母Female | 36.28±1.70 | 49.76±2.29 | 57.85±3.53 | 71.69±5.03 | 80.87±2.42 | 84.72±2.03 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.18±2.64 | 50.89±4.59 | 60.90±2.76 | 68.73±8.08 | 72.03±5.13 | 89.06±4.22 | |
| 母Female | 38.72±2.51 | 50.08±3.92 | 60.18±3.19 | 69.23±3.73 | 71.63±1.57 | 89.84±2.55 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 33.81±1.99c | 45.82±2.59b | 52.93±3.38c | 54.94±4.29c | 67.68±2.41c | 82.16±3.33c |
| AH | 36.14±2.29b | 49.77±4.42a | 58.13±3.58b | 70.72±4.02ab | 82.31±3.85a | 85.82±3.33b | ||
| DH | 36.07±2.08b | 50.43±2.79a | 57.19±3.80b | 73.19±5.91a | 82.84±3.35a | 86.70±3.24b | ||
| XH | 39.45±2.62a | 50.48±4.17a | 60.54±2.93a | 68.98±6.13b | 71.83±3.70b | 89.45±3.42a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 36.13±3.30 | 49.03±3.96 | 57.09±4.42 | 67.88±8.78 | 77.55±8.05a | 86.86±4.35 | |
| 母Female | 36.60±2.69 | 49.22±4.13 | 57.31±4.35 | 66.04±8.75 | 74.78±6.50b | 85.20±3.90 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.342 | 0.812 | 0.783 | 0.114 | <0.001 | 0.230 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.084 | 0.183 | 0.550 | 0.506 | 0.160 | 0.109 | ||
表6 不同杂交组合绵羊不同日龄胸围的比较
Table 6 Comparison of chest circumference of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 33.43±1.54 | 45.96±2.58 | 53.48±4.09 | 56.94±3.80 | 68.84±2.08 | 82.59±3.29 | |
| 母Female | 34.18±2.39 | 45.68±2.73 | 52.38±2.60 | 52.94±3.93 | 66.51±2.22 | 81.72±3.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 35.06±2.02 | 48.17±3.15 | 57.45±3.51 | 71.14±3.74 | 84.50±3.22 | 87.10±3.84 | |
| 母Female | 37.23±2.09 | 51.37±5.06 | 58.81±3.70 | 70.29±4.44 | 80.11±3.21 | 84.53±2.23 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.86±2.47 | 51.11±3.18 | 56.53±4.13 | 74.69±6.59 | 84.81±3.03 | 88.67±3.07 | |
| 母Female | 36.28±1.70 | 49.76±2.29 | 57.85±3.53 | 71.69±5.03 | 80.87±2.42 | 84.72±2.03 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.18±2.64 | 50.89±4.59 | 60.90±2.76 | 68.73±8.08 | 72.03±5.13 | 89.06±4.22 | |
| 母Female | 38.72±2.51 | 50.08±3.92 | 60.18±3.19 | 69.23±3.73 | 71.63±1.57 | 89.84±2.55 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 33.81±1.99c | 45.82±2.59b | 52.93±3.38c | 54.94±4.29c | 67.68±2.41c | 82.16±3.33c |
| AH | 36.14±2.29b | 49.77±4.42a | 58.13±3.58b | 70.72±4.02ab | 82.31±3.85a | 85.82±3.33b | ||
| DH | 36.07±2.08b | 50.43±2.79a | 57.19±3.80b | 73.19±5.91a | 82.84±3.35a | 86.70±3.24b | ||
| XH | 39.45±2.62a | 50.48±4.17a | 60.54±2.93a | 68.98±6.13b | 71.83±3.70b | 89.45±3.42a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 36.13±3.30 | 49.03±3.96 | 57.09±4.42 | 67.88±8.78 | 77.55±8.05a | 86.86±4.35 | |
| 母Female | 36.60±2.69 | 49.22±4.13 | 57.31±4.35 | 66.04±8.75 | 74.78±6.50b | 85.20±3.90 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.342 | 0.812 | 0.783 | 0.114 | <0.001 | 0.230 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.084 | 0.183 | 0.550 | 0.506 | 0.160 | 0.109 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 5.43±0.31 | 5.93±0.30 | 6.29±0.45 | 6.92±0.50 | 7.96±0.40 | 8.57±0.36 | |
| 母Female | 5.15±0.38 | 5.64±0.41 | 5.90±0.48 | 6.56±0.25 | 7.68±0.41 | 8.12±0.28 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 5.91±0.46 | 6.62±0.76 | 7.80±0.35 | 7.90±0.48 | 8.66±0.45 | 9.71±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 6.10±0.52 | 6.87±0.68 | 7.56±0.32 | 7.85±0.29 | 8.31±0.17 | 9.00±0.43 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 5.77±0.51 | 6.60±0.38 | 7.82±0.53 | 8.41±0.26 | 8.97±0.21 | 10.01±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 5.89±0.40 | 6.76±0.50 | 7.69±0.40 | 8.06±0.19 | 8.44±0.24 | 9.44±0.34 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.32±0.27 | 6.67±0.29 | 7.12±0.18 | 7.71±0.74 | 8.95±0.95 | 9.58±0.70 | |
| 母Female | 6.39±0.39 | 6.69±0.43 | 6.81±0.38 | 7.23±0.42 | 8.06±0.61 | 9.06±0.38 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 5.29±0.37c | 5.79±0.38b | 6.10±0.50c | 6.74±0.43d | 7.82±0.42b | 8.35±0.39c |
| AH | 6.00±0.49b | 6.75±0.71a | 7.68±0.35a | 7.88±0.39b | 8.49±0.37a | 9.36±0.57b | ||
| DH | 5.83±0.45b | 6.68±0.44a | 7.76±0.46a | 8.24±0.28a | 8.71±0.35a | 9.73±0.49a | ||
| XH | 6.36±0.33a | 6.68±0.35a | 6.97±0.33b | 7.47±0.64c | 8.51±0.90a | 9.32±0.61b | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 5.86±0.50 | 6.46±0.55 | 7.26±0.74a | 7.73±0.74a | 8.64±0.69a | 9.47±0.74a | |
| 母Female | 5.88±0.62 | 6.49±0.70 | 6.99±0.82b | 7.41±0.66b | 8.12±0.48b | 8.91±0.60b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.775 | 0.753 | 0.004 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.282 | 0.329 | 0.767 | 0.434 | 0.212 | 0.882 | ||
表7 不同杂交组合绵羊不同日龄管围的比较
Table 7 Comparison of tube circumference of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 5.43±0.31 | 5.93±0.30 | 6.29±0.45 | 6.92±0.50 | 7.96±0.40 | 8.57±0.36 | |
| 母Female | 5.15±0.38 | 5.64±0.41 | 5.90±0.48 | 6.56±0.25 | 7.68±0.41 | 8.12±0.28 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 5.91±0.46 | 6.62±0.76 | 7.80±0.35 | 7.90±0.48 | 8.66±0.45 | 9.71±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 6.10±0.52 | 6.87±0.68 | 7.56±0.32 | 7.85±0.29 | 8.31±0.17 | 9.00±0.43 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 5.77±0.51 | 6.60±0.38 | 7.82±0.53 | 8.41±0.26 | 8.97±0.21 | 10.01±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 5.89±0.40 | 6.76±0.50 | 7.69±0.40 | 8.06±0.19 | 8.44±0.24 | 9.44±0.34 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.32±0.27 | 6.67±0.29 | 7.12±0.18 | 7.71±0.74 | 8.95±0.95 | 9.58±0.70 | |
| 母Female | 6.39±0.39 | 6.69±0.43 | 6.81±0.38 | 7.23±0.42 | 8.06±0.61 | 9.06±0.38 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 5.29±0.37c | 5.79±0.38b | 6.10±0.50c | 6.74±0.43d | 7.82±0.42b | 8.35±0.39c |
| AH | 6.00±0.49b | 6.75±0.71a | 7.68±0.35a | 7.88±0.39b | 8.49±0.37a | 9.36±0.57b | ||
| DH | 5.83±0.45b | 6.68±0.44a | 7.76±0.46a | 8.24±0.28a | 8.71±0.35a | 9.73±0.49a | ||
| XH | 6.36±0.33a | 6.68±0.35a | 6.97±0.33b | 7.47±0.64c | 8.51±0.90a | 9.32±0.61b | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 5.86±0.50 | 6.46±0.55 | 7.26±0.74a | 7.73±0.74a | 8.64±0.69a | 9.47±0.74a | |
| 母Female | 5.88±0.62 | 6.49±0.70 | 6.99±0.82b | 7.41±0.66b | 8.12±0.48b | 8.91±0.60b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.775 | 0.753 | 0.004 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.282 | 0.329 | 0.767 | 0.434 | 0.212 | 0.882 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | TP (g·L-1) | ALB (g·L-1) | AST (U·L-1) | ALT (U·L-1) | BUN (mmol·L-1) | CRE (μmol·L-1) | TG (mmol·L-1) | TC (mmol·L-1) | HDL (mmol·L-1) | LDL (mmol·L-1) | GLU (mmol·L-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 25.94±1.83 | 20.12±4.83 | 12.86±10.37 | 26.74±20.85a | 3.96±1.73 | 59.83±11.79 | 0.19±0.14 | 3.25±1.40 | 1.36±0.24 | 3.64±1.28 | 4.88±0.48 | |
| 母Female | 26.89±3.58 | 20.24±6.11 | 11.91±6.84 | 10.79±10.25b | 3.42±2.35 | 55.27±9.33 | 0.21±0.14 | 2.72±1.08 | 1.86±0.25 | 4.53±1.29 | 4.13±0.51 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 29.25±2.93 | 25.69±6.05 | 14.03±6.43 | 7.53±4.69b | 4.72±1.72 | 67.74±7.47 | 0.18±0.06 | 3.48±0.97 | 1.83±0.53 | 4.32±1.45 | 3.33±0.58 | |
| 母Female | 28.77±4.99 | 24.22±4.83 | 13.08±2.92 | 25.31±23.47a | 4.87±1.54 | 59.32±9.76 | 0.22±0.09 | 2.90±0.48 | 1.71±0.59 | 3.92±1.09 | 3.57±1.02 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 27.56±3.47 | 28.44±7.16 | 12.44±5.72 | 12.18±7.31b | 4.69±2.29 | 70.33±10.64 | 0.24±0.09 | 3.50±0.88 | 1.47±0.32 | 3.76±1.29 | 3.28±0.42 | |
| 母Female | 30.24±2.02 | 25.24±6.32 | 23.07±17.52 | 10.66±7.04b | 4.70±1.76 | 67.90±13.35 | 0.26±0.12 | 2.64±0.70 | 1.47±0.37 | 3.66±0.85 | 3.49±0.87 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 30.99±2.53 | 31.04±10.97 | 9.66±3.45 | 9.39±8.81b | 5.23±2.17 | 72.29±8.62 | 0.27±0.05 | 2.73±0.68 | 1.89±0.36 | 4.30±0.61 | 4.52±0.88 | |
| 母Female | 33.98±3.36 | 27.21±5.28 | 8.60±5.59 | 11.99±10.13b | 6.11±1.59 | 79.40±9.55 | 0.28±0.10 | 3.04±0.80 | 2.08±0.19 | 3.94±1.26 | 4.72±0.94 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 26.42±2.79c | 20.18±5.32b | 12.38±8.57ab | 18.77±17.97 | 3.69±2.03b | 57.55±10.61c | 0.20±0.14 | 2.98±1.25 | 1.61±0.35bc | 4.09±1.33 | 4.50±0.62a |
| AH | 29.01±3.96b | 24.96±5.34a | 13.55±4.89ab | 16.42±18.83 | 4.79±1.59ab | 63.53±9.50bc | 0.20±0.08 | 3.19±0.80 | 1.77±0.55ab | 4.12±1.27 | 3.45±0.82b | ||
| DH | 28.90±3.07b | 26.84±6.73a | 17.75±13.81a | 11.42±7.03 | 4.69±1.99ab | 69.11±11.82b | 0.25±0.11 | 3.07±0.89 | 1.47±0.34c | 3.71±1.07 | 3.38±0.68b | ||
| XH | 32.48±3.26a | 29.12±8.55a | 9.13±4.55b | 10.69±9.34 | 5.67±1.91a | 75.85±9.57a | 0.28±0.08 | 2.89±0.74 | 1.99±0.30a | 4.12±0.98 | 4.62±0.89a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 28.43±3.24 | 26.32±8.32 | 12.25±6.88 | 13.96±13.94 | 4.65±1.97 | 67.55±10.55 | 0.22±0.10 | 3.24±1.03a | 1.64±0.43 | 4.01±1.20 | 4.00±0.93 | |
| 母Female | 29.97±4.36 | 24.23±5.98 | 14.16±10.99 | 14.69±15.01 | 4.78±2.01 | 65.47±13.85 | 0.24±0.11 | 2.82±0.78b | 1.78±0.43 | 4.01±1.14 | 3.98±0.96 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.165 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.066 | 0.753 | 0.001 | 0.632 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.062 | 0.217 | 0.320 | 0.806 | 0.774 | 0.366 | 0.323 | 0.045 | 0.094 | 0.981 | 0.892 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.398 | 0.839 | 0.085 | 0.002 | 0.707 | 0.108 | 0.976 | 0.209 | 0.064 | 0.275 | 0.107 | ||
表8 不同杂交组合绵羊血清生化指标的比较
Table 8 Comparison of serum biochemical indexes of sheep in different hybrid combinations
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | TP (g·L-1) | ALB (g·L-1) | AST (U·L-1) | ALT (U·L-1) | BUN (mmol·L-1) | CRE (μmol·L-1) | TG (mmol·L-1) | TC (mmol·L-1) | HDL (mmol·L-1) | LDL (mmol·L-1) | GLU (mmol·L-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 25.94±1.83 | 20.12±4.83 | 12.86±10.37 | 26.74±20.85a | 3.96±1.73 | 59.83±11.79 | 0.19±0.14 | 3.25±1.40 | 1.36±0.24 | 3.64±1.28 | 4.88±0.48 | |
| 母Female | 26.89±3.58 | 20.24±6.11 | 11.91±6.84 | 10.79±10.25b | 3.42±2.35 | 55.27±9.33 | 0.21±0.14 | 2.72±1.08 | 1.86±0.25 | 4.53±1.29 | 4.13±0.51 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 29.25±2.93 | 25.69±6.05 | 14.03±6.43 | 7.53±4.69b | 4.72±1.72 | 67.74±7.47 | 0.18±0.06 | 3.48±0.97 | 1.83±0.53 | 4.32±1.45 | 3.33±0.58 | |
| 母Female | 28.77±4.99 | 24.22±4.83 | 13.08±2.92 | 25.31±23.47a | 4.87±1.54 | 59.32±9.76 | 0.22±0.09 | 2.90±0.48 | 1.71±0.59 | 3.92±1.09 | 3.57±1.02 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 27.56±3.47 | 28.44±7.16 | 12.44±5.72 | 12.18±7.31b | 4.69±2.29 | 70.33±10.64 | 0.24±0.09 | 3.50±0.88 | 1.47±0.32 | 3.76±1.29 | 3.28±0.42 | |
| 母Female | 30.24±2.02 | 25.24±6.32 | 23.07±17.52 | 10.66±7.04b | 4.70±1.76 | 67.90±13.35 | 0.26±0.12 | 2.64±0.70 | 1.47±0.37 | 3.66±0.85 | 3.49±0.87 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 30.99±2.53 | 31.04±10.97 | 9.66±3.45 | 9.39±8.81b | 5.23±2.17 | 72.29±8.62 | 0.27±0.05 | 2.73±0.68 | 1.89±0.36 | 4.30±0.61 | 4.52±0.88 | |
| 母Female | 33.98±3.36 | 27.21±5.28 | 8.60±5.59 | 11.99±10.13b | 6.11±1.59 | 79.40±9.55 | 0.28±0.10 | 3.04±0.80 | 2.08±0.19 | 3.94±1.26 | 4.72±0.94 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 26.42±2.79c | 20.18±5.32b | 12.38±8.57ab | 18.77±17.97 | 3.69±2.03b | 57.55±10.61c | 0.20±0.14 | 2.98±1.25 | 1.61±0.35bc | 4.09±1.33 | 4.50±0.62a |
| AH | 29.01±3.96b | 24.96±5.34a | 13.55±4.89ab | 16.42±18.83 | 4.79±1.59ab | 63.53±9.50bc | 0.20±0.08 | 3.19±0.80 | 1.77±0.55ab | 4.12±1.27 | 3.45±0.82b | ||
| DH | 28.90±3.07b | 26.84±6.73a | 17.75±13.81a | 11.42±7.03 | 4.69±1.99ab | 69.11±11.82b | 0.25±0.11 | 3.07±0.89 | 1.47±0.34c | 3.71±1.07 | 3.38±0.68b | ||
| XH | 32.48±3.26a | 29.12±8.55a | 9.13±4.55b | 10.69±9.34 | 5.67±1.91a | 75.85±9.57a | 0.28±0.08 | 2.89±0.74 | 1.99±0.30a | 4.12±0.98 | 4.62±0.89a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 28.43±3.24 | 26.32±8.32 | 12.25±6.88 | 13.96±13.94 | 4.65±1.97 | 67.55±10.55 | 0.22±0.10 | 3.24±1.03a | 1.64±0.43 | 4.01±1.20 | 4.00±0.93 | |
| 母Female | 29.97±4.36 | 24.23±5.98 | 14.16±10.99 | 14.69±15.01 | 4.78±2.01 | 65.47±13.85 | 0.24±0.11 | 2.82±0.78b | 1.78±0.43 | 4.01±1.14 | 3.98±0.96 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.165 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.066 | 0.753 | 0.001 | 0.632 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.062 | 0.217 | 0.320 | 0.806 | 0.774 | 0.366 | 0.323 | 0.045 | 0.094 | 0.981 | 0.892 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.398 | 0.839 | 0.085 | 0.002 | 0.707 | 0.108 | 0.976 | 0.209 | 0.064 | 0.275 | 0.107 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | pH | AA (mmol·L-1) | PA (mmol·L-1) | IBA (mmol·L-1) | BA (mmol·L-1) | IVA (mmol·L-1) | VA (mmol·L-1) | TVFA (mmol·L-1) | AN (mg·dL-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 6.44±0.08 | 36.75±6.55 | 8.88±1.60 | 1.09±0.26ab | 4.85±1.40 | 1.25±0.22c | 0.47±0.14 | 53.29±7.12 | 19.32±0.30 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.10 | 38.38±3.30 | 7.41±0.93 | 1.19±0.13a | 4.44±0.77 | 1.22±0.14c | 0.42±0.05 | 53.05±2.71 | 18.67±1.30 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 6.41±0.09 | 42.47±8.13 | 7.84±2.27 | 1.08±0.22ab | 6.01±0.98 | 1.29±0.27c | 0.74±0.15 | 59.41±8.42 | 20.94±1.34 | |
| 母Female | 6.50±0.03 | 40.51±5.47 | 7.71±0.71 | 0.94±0.08b | 7.88±2.30 | 1.59±0.33ab | 0.75±0.15 | 59.40±5.66 | 20.00±1.03 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 6.42±0.09 | 42.13±7.32 | 9.02±2.66 | 1.15±0.14a | 6.24±0.76 | 1.43±0.24bc | 0.74±0.15 | 60.72±6.69 | 23.51±5.57 | |
| 母Female | 6.48±0.08 | 45.51±3.01 | 8.72±1.40 | 0.89±0.12b | 7.06±0.85 | 1.27±0.22c | 0.69±0.18 | 64.14±4.78 | 21.22±1.22 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.39±0.08 | 43.54±1.88 | 7.65±1.29 | 1.07±0.09ab | 6.94±2.02 | 1.46±0.17abc | 0.58±0.15 | 61.25±3.85 | 21.06±1.15 | |
| 母Female | 6.36±0.05 | 42.39±4.41 | 8.58±1.69 | 1.24±0.12a | 5.94±0.62 | 1.72±0.19a | 0.53±0.06 | 60.41±5.54 | 22.29±1.27 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 6.45±0.08 | 37.56±5.02b | 8.14±1.46 | 1.14±0.20 | 4.64±1.10b | 1.14±0.20ab | 0.45±0.10c | 53.17±5.14b | 19.00±0.96b |
| AH | 6.45±0.08 | 41.49±6.68ab | 7.78±1.60 | 1.01±0.18 | 6.95±1.95a | 1.01±0.18b | 0.75±0.14a | 59.40±6.84a | 20.47±1.24ab | ||
| DH | 6.45±0.08 | 43.82±5.62a | 8.87±2.03 | 1.02±0.19 | 6.65±0.88a | 1.02±0.19b | 0.72±0.16a | 62.43±5.83a | 22.37±4.03a | ||
| XH | 6.39±0.04 | 42.97±3.29a | 8.12±1.51 | 1.15±0.14 | 6.44±1.52a | 1.15±0.14a | 0.56±0.11b | 60.83±4.57a | 21.67±1.32a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 6.41±0.07 | 41.22±6.59 | 8.35±1.99 | 1.10±0.18 | 6.01±1.50 | 1.36±0.23 | 0.63±0.18 | 58.67±7.06 | 21.21±3.13 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.07 | 41.70±4.71 | 8.11±1.29 | 1.06±0.19 | 6.33±1.81 | 1.45±0.30 | 0.60±0.18 | 59.25±6.07 | 20.55±1.78 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.479 | 0.036 | 0.448 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.040 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.196 | 0.762 | 0.622 | 0.482 | 0.419 | 0.159 | 0.384 | 0.732 | 0.311 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.699 | 0.605 | 0.394 | 0.006 | 0.058 | 0.046 | 0.900 | 0.807 | 0.302 | ||
表9 不同杂交组合绵羊瘤胃发酵参数的比较
Table 9 Comparison of rumen fermentation parameters of sheep in different hybrid combinations
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | pH | AA (mmol·L-1) | PA (mmol·L-1) | IBA (mmol·L-1) | BA (mmol·L-1) | IVA (mmol·L-1) | VA (mmol·L-1) | TVFA (mmol·L-1) | AN (mg·dL-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 6.44±0.08 | 36.75±6.55 | 8.88±1.60 | 1.09±0.26ab | 4.85±1.40 | 1.25±0.22c | 0.47±0.14 | 53.29±7.12 | 19.32±0.30 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.10 | 38.38±3.30 | 7.41±0.93 | 1.19±0.13a | 4.44±0.77 | 1.22±0.14c | 0.42±0.05 | 53.05±2.71 | 18.67±1.30 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 6.41±0.09 | 42.47±8.13 | 7.84±2.27 | 1.08±0.22ab | 6.01±0.98 | 1.29±0.27c | 0.74±0.15 | 59.41±8.42 | 20.94±1.34 | |
| 母Female | 6.50±0.03 | 40.51±5.47 | 7.71±0.71 | 0.94±0.08b | 7.88±2.30 | 1.59±0.33ab | 0.75±0.15 | 59.40±5.66 | 20.00±1.03 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 6.42±0.09 | 42.13±7.32 | 9.02±2.66 | 1.15±0.14a | 6.24±0.76 | 1.43±0.24bc | 0.74±0.15 | 60.72±6.69 | 23.51±5.57 | |
| 母Female | 6.48±0.08 | 45.51±3.01 | 8.72±1.40 | 0.89±0.12b | 7.06±0.85 | 1.27±0.22c | 0.69±0.18 | 64.14±4.78 | 21.22±1.22 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.39±0.08 | 43.54±1.88 | 7.65±1.29 | 1.07±0.09ab | 6.94±2.02 | 1.46±0.17abc | 0.58±0.15 | 61.25±3.85 | 21.06±1.15 | |
| 母Female | 6.36±0.05 | 42.39±4.41 | 8.58±1.69 | 1.24±0.12a | 5.94±0.62 | 1.72±0.19a | 0.53±0.06 | 60.41±5.54 | 22.29±1.27 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 6.45±0.08 | 37.56±5.02b | 8.14±1.46 | 1.14±0.20 | 4.64±1.10b | 1.14±0.20ab | 0.45±0.10c | 53.17±5.14b | 19.00±0.96b |
| AH | 6.45±0.08 | 41.49±6.68ab | 7.78±1.60 | 1.01±0.18 | 6.95±1.95a | 1.01±0.18b | 0.75±0.14a | 59.40±6.84a | 20.47±1.24ab | ||
| DH | 6.45±0.08 | 43.82±5.62a | 8.87±2.03 | 1.02±0.19 | 6.65±0.88a | 1.02±0.19b | 0.72±0.16a | 62.43±5.83a | 22.37±4.03a | ||
| XH | 6.39±0.04 | 42.97±3.29a | 8.12±1.51 | 1.15±0.14 | 6.44±1.52a | 1.15±0.14a | 0.56±0.11b | 60.83±4.57a | 21.67±1.32a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 6.41±0.07 | 41.22±6.59 | 8.35±1.99 | 1.10±0.18 | 6.01±1.50 | 1.36±0.23 | 0.63±0.18 | 58.67±7.06 | 21.21±3.13 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.07 | 41.70±4.71 | 8.11±1.29 | 1.06±0.19 | 6.33±1.81 | 1.45±0.30 | 0.60±0.18 | 59.25±6.07 | 20.55±1.78 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.479 | 0.036 | 0.448 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.040 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.196 | 0.762 | 0.622 | 0.482 | 0.419 | 0.159 | 0.384 | 0.732 | 0.311 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.699 | 0.605 | 0.394 | 0.006 | 0.058 | 0.046 | 0.900 | 0.807 | 0.302 | ||
| [1] | Zhan J S, Yang Q, Zhong X J, et al. Effects of total mixed rations with different concentration-roughage ratios on meat quality, serumindices, and intestinal tract development in Hu sheep. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(12): 3166-3174. |
| 占今舜, 杨群, 钟小军, 等. 不同精粗比饲粮对湖羊肉品质、血液指标和肠道发育的影响. 草业科学, 2019, 36(12): 3166-3174. | |
| [2] | Li Q, Shao Y W K, Feng T Y, et al. Research progress on the effects of different hybrid combinations of meat sheep in China. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2019 (19) : 43-45. |
| 李倩, 邵勇维克, 冯天雨, 等. 我国肉用绵羊不同杂交组合效果研究进展. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019(19): 43-45. | |
| [3] | Jiang X M, Zhang Y H, Maerziya·Yasen, et al. Research progress on the introduction of Australian White sheep into China. Grass Feeding Livestock, 2022(2): 1-6. |
| 蒋晓梅, 张艳花, 玛尔孜娅·亚森, 等. 我国引入澳洲白绵羊的研究进展. 草食家畜, 2022(2): 1-6. | |
| [4] | Wang Y F, Wang Y Y, Li X H. LEF1 bioinformatics and expression analysis in Dorper sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2022, 42(4): 13-17. |
| 王翊帆, 王雅艳, 李新海. 杜泊羊LEF1生物信息学及表达分析. 中国草食动物科学, 2022, 42(4): 13-17. | |
| [5] | Zhang Y D, Wang L, Yan T Y, et al. Study on the hybrid effect of Australian White sheep, Dorpersheep and small-tailed Han sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2014, 34(6): 10-12. |
| 张永东, 王磊, 严天元, 等. 澳洲白羊、杜泊羊与小尾寒羊杂交效果研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2014, 34(6): 10-12. | |
| [6] | Yang D L, Yang D G, An Y F, et al. Study on hybrid effect of Tibetan sheep of Qinghai Plateau type and Australian White sheep, black-headed Dorper sheep, black-headed Suffolk sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2019, 39(6): 70-72. |
| 杨杜录, 杨东贵, 安玉峰, 等. 青海高原型藏羊与澳洲白羊、黑头杜泊羊、黑头萨福克羊杂交效果的研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2019, 39(6): 70-72. | |
| [7] | Kong L X, Yang X Y, Lian Z Q, et al. A comparative study on the improvements by crossbreeding of Dorper sheep and Australian White sheep with Hu sheep. Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 50(8): 6-10. |
| 孔令旋, 杨新月, 练志全, 等. 杜泊羊、澳洲白绵羊与湖羊杂交效果的比较. 畜牧与兽医, 2018, 50 (8): 6-10. | |
| [8] | Wang X, Wang G C, Xia D C, et al. The analysis of correlation and multiple regression on body weight and body size of Charolais sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2024, 60 (7): 133-136. |
| 王鑫, 王国春, 夏德翠, 等. 夏洛来羊体重与体尺相关性及多元回归分析. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60 (7): 133-136. | |
| [9] | Wang J, Shen C X, Luo Z Q, et al. Analysis on hybrid improvement effect of Charolais sheep and small-tailed Han sheep. The Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2017 (3): 69-71. |
| 王军, 谌春湘, 骆志强, 等. 夏洛莱羊与小尾寒羊杂交改良效果分析. 中国畜禽种业, 2017 (3): 69-71. | |
| [10] | Liu Y J, Wang J T, Liu Z Z, et al. Screening of hybrid combinations and genetic effects analysis of GLPG gene in meat sheep. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(1): 55-63. |
| 刘艳军, 王建涛, 刘铮铸, 等. 肉用绵羊二元杂交组合的筛选及GLPG基因遗传效应研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(1): 55-63. | |
| [11] | Agricultural Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Nutrient requirements of meat-type sheep and goat: NY/T 816-2021. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2022. |
| 中华人民共和国农业行业标准. 肉羊营养需要量: NY/T 816-2021. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022. | |
| [12] | Gao L Q, Zhan J S, Hu Y, et al. Effects of total mixed ration with different concentration-roughage ratios on growth performance, serum hormone concentrations and slaughter performance of Hu sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(4): 1676-1684. |
| 高林青, 占今舜, 胡耀, 等. 不同精粗比全混合日粮对湖羊生长性能、血清激素浓度和屠宰性能的影响. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(4): 1676-1684. | |
| [13] | Zhan J S, Liu Y, Zhan Y P, et al. Effects of dietary protein level on meat quality, serum enzyme activity and intestinal development of Guangfeng goat. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(3): 1493-1502. |
| 占今舜, 刘远, 占咏平, 等. 饲粮蛋白质水平对广丰山羊肉品质、血清酶活性、瘤胃发酵和肠道发育的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(3): 1493-1502. | |
| [14] | Pan X R, Chen G R, Wang X P, et al. The study on hybridization experiment of Australian White sheep, Dorper sheep, and small-tailed Han sheep, Hu sheep. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2017, 47(10): 113-114, 119. |
| 潘晓荣, 陈广仁, 王晓平, 等. 澳洲白、杜泊羊与小尾寒羊、湖羊杂交试验研究. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2017, 47(10): 113-114, 119. | |
| [15] | Chen G R, Pan X R, Yuan Y, et al. Evaluation of hybrid effect between Australian White sheep and Hu sheep in Hexi Corridor of Gansu Province. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 323-329. |
| 陈广仁, 潘晓荣, 袁勇, 等. 澳洲白绵羊与湖羊在甘肃河西走廊区杂交效果评价. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(3): 323-329. | |
| [16] | Luo Y, Pareha·Paerhati, Yang L X, et al. Improvement experiment of hybrid breed between Dorper and Hu sheep. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2024, 44(6): 28-29. |
| 罗渝, 帕热哈·帕尔哈提, 杨玲霞, 等. 杜泊羊与湖羊杂交品种改良试验. 农业工程技术, 2024, 44(6): 28-29. | |
| [17] | Zhan J S, Zhong X J, Zhan Q B, et al. Effects of concentrates with different protein levels on growth performance, slaughter performance and serum biochemical indexes of Guangfeng goat. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(1): 528-536. |
| 占今舜, 钟小军, 占清标, 等. 不同蛋白质水平精料对广丰山羊生长性能、屠宰性能和血清生化指标的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(1): 528-536. | |
| [18] | Guo S X, Wang Q, Liu L L, et al. Analysis of the correlation between body weight and body size of Duolang sheep and Duohu F2 generation. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2021(15): 56-60. |
| 郭锁鑫, 王琼, 刘玲玲, 等. 多浪羊与多湖F2代体重与体尺指标的相关关系分析. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2021 (15): 56-60. | |
| [19] | Qi P, Wang X W, Zhang J, et al. Research on lambing number, early growth performance and fattening performance of the hybrid generation between Dorper sheep/Suffolk sheep and Hu sheep. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2024 (22): 53-57. |
| 亓鹏, 王小伟, 张菊, 等. 杜泊羊、萨福克羊与湖羊杂交一代产羔数、羔羊早期生长性能和育肥性能的研究. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2024(22): 53-57. | |
| [20] | Wang Z W, Mao Y Y, Sun R F, et al. Study on hybrid effect of different meat sheep breeds and Hu Sheep. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016(10): 88-90. |
| 王志武, 毛杨毅, 孙锐锋, 等. 不同肉羊品种与湖羊杂交效果研究. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(10): 88-90. | |
| [21] | He M C, Dong H, Yang J X, et al. Screening hybrid combinations of Hu sheep. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 54(1): 22-26. |
| 何茂昌, 董和, 杨军祥, 等. 湖羊杂交组合筛选试验研究. 畜牧与兽医, 2022, 54(1): 22-26. | |
| [22] | Zhan J S, Huo J H, Zhong X J, et al. Effects of diet added with rutin on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes and hormone levels and rumen fermentation of Hu sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(5): 2717-2726. |
| 占今舜, 霍俊宏, 钟小军, 等. 饲粮中添加芦丁对湖羊生长性能、血清生化指标和激素水平及瘤胃发酵的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(5): 2717-2726. | |
| [23] | Tian M, Han C M, Liu K, et al. Variation regularity and correlation analysis of blood biochemical indicators in dairy goats during different lactation stages. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2024, 45(10): 36-42. |
| 田敏, 韩程名, 刘坤, 等. 不同泌乳时期奶山羊血液生化指标变化规律及其相关性分析. 家畜生态学报, 2024, 45(10): 36-42. | |
| [24] | Zhan J S, Jiang H Y, Wang H B, et al. The changes of serum biochemical indexes, oxidation resistance and immune property in pre and post-weaning lambs. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 202-211. |
| 占今舜, 江浩筠, 王海波, 等. 羔羊断奶前后血清生化指标、抗氧化和免疫性能的变化. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 202-211. | |
| [25] | Ding C R, Sun Y Q. Predictive value of combined detection of serum Cys-C, UPCR and serum Cr levels for the prognosis of patients with diabetic nephropathy. Clinical Medical & Engineering, 2024, 31(12): 1519-1520. |
| 丁丛仁, 孙跃琦. 血清Cys-C、UPCR、血清Cr水平联合检测对糖尿病肾病患者预后的预测价值. 临床医学工程, 2024, 31(12): 1519-1520. | |
| [26] | Wang H B, Gu Z Y, Liu Y, et al. Effect of quercetin on growth performance and serum physiological and immuno- antioxidant capacity of early weaned Guangfeng goat lambs.Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2025, 51(1): 90-97. |
| 王海波, 谷志勇, 刘远, 等. 槲皮素对早期断奶广丰山羊羔羊的生长性能和血清生理及免疫抗氧化能力的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 51(1): 90-97. | |
| [27] | Zhan J S, Gu Z Y, Wang H B, et al. Effects of rutin supplementation on growth performance, slaughter performance, serum parameters, and meat quality of Nubian goats. Animal Science Journal, 2023, 94(1): e13819. |
| [28] | Wang H B, Zhan J S, Jia H B, et al. Effects of rumen fermentation level on slaughter performance, antioxidant and immune functions and composition of volatile fatty acids in the intestine of Hu sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2024, 60(7): 263-268. |
| 王海波, 占今舜, 贾浩滨, 等. 瘤胃发酵水平对湖羊屠宰性能、机体抗氧化和免疫功能及肠道挥发性脂肪酸组成的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60(7): 263-268. | |
| [29] | Zhan J S, Zhan K, Yang F Y, et al. Effects of diet supplemented probiotics on growth performance, blood biochemical indices and rumen fermentation of Nubian goats. China Herbivore Science, 2021, 41(6): 6-12, 23. |
| 占今舜, 詹康, 杨富裕, 等. 饲粮中添加益生菌对努比亚山羊生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃发酵的影响. 中国草食动物科学, 2021, 41(6): 6-12, 23. | |
| [30] | Wang C, Huang Y X, Liu Q, et al. Effects of valerate acid on rumen fermentation of Simmental cattle. Feed Industry, 2006, 27(19): 22-24. |
| 王聪, 黄应祥, 刘强, 等. 戊酸对西门塔尔牛瘤胃发酵的影响. 饲料工业, 2006, 27(19): 22-24. | |
| [31] | Zhang Z W, Zhu M X, Wang C F. Effects of isoacids on ruminal metabolism and performance in rumiants: A review. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(3): 1408-1415. |
| 张振威, 朱明霞, 王长法. 异位酸影响反刍动物瘤胃代谢和生产性能的研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(3): 1408-1415. | |
| [32] | Ran H, Zhu S X, Liu T, et al. Effects of Astragalus polysaccharide powder on rumen fermentation parameters and microflora of Hu sheep in vitro. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2025, 37(3): 1880-1892. |
| 冉航, 朱声鑫, 刘婷, 等. 黄芪多糖粉对湖羊瘤胃体外发酵参数和微生物区系的影响. 动物营养学报, 2025, 37(3): 1880-1892. |
| [1] | 贾浩滨, 江浩筠, 李爱华, 王海波, 林孙权, 潘月, 霍俊宏, 占今舜. 不同精粗比饲粮对广丰山羊生产性能、血清生化、瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(3): 170-184. |
| [2] | 姚东旭, 王彩忠, 郑琛. 猫尾草对幼龄肉兔生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(3): 185-194. |
| [3] | 王红林, 文斌, 左艳春, 张凯, 吴子周, 严旭, 袁正才, 邓榆川, 肖蔹, 陈慧, 寇晶, 傅祥超, 杜周和. 全株饲料桑添加量对川白獭兔幼兔肠道形态、血液生化指标、肌肉中氨基酸含量及经济效益的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(8): 199-210. |
| [4] | 张敏, 杨锐, 黄逸州, 林芷昕, 郑贤跃, 刘庆华, 高玉云, 林冬梅, 林占熺, 金灵. 巨菌草对育肥从江香猪生长性能及肠道健康的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 171-188. |
| [5] | 祁帅, 张艳丽, 万永杰, 牛伟强, 张积鑫, 高雪, 茆达干. 菌酶协同发酵豆秸对湖羊生长性能、血清指标和瘤胃微生物的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 189-201. |
| [6] | 占今舜, 江浩筠, 王海波, 贾浩滨, 潘月, 钟小军, 霍俊宏. 羔羊断奶前后血清生化指标、抗氧化和免疫性能的变化[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 202-211. |
| [7] | 韩航琪, 王梓凡, 丁赫, 陈玉荣, 王琦, 张晓庆. 燕麦干草与燕麦草块对绵羊瘤胃发酵及微生物组成影响的比较分析[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 212-222. |
| [8] | 郭楠, 杜鹉辰, 纪守坤, 刘建, 崔素倩, 袁辉, 韩旭, 刘计双, 高立杰. 施肥和补播对山地草甸牧草营养及瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 150-163. |
| [9] | 卢琦, 覃继肖, 班一鸣, 高成成, 杨蓉, 李培瑶, 许一清, 谢双龙, 陈睿, 周迪, 田兴舟. 不同水平紫玉米花青素提取物对肉牛体外产气和瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(10): 202-212. |
| [10] | 靳生伟, 韩银仓, 孙永刚, 丁维芹, 刘亚倩, 祁增源, 周建强. 冷季不同饲养方式对牦牛生长性能及血液生理生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(1): 215-225. |
| [11] | 洪莉平, 李小冬, 于二汝, 裴成江, 尚以顺, 骆金红, 孙光, 周云昊, 李世歌, 杨航, 刘凤丹. 不同紫苏原料对贵州黑山羊血清抗氧化酶活性、瘤胃发酵参数、瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(9): 214-226. |
| [12] | 苏东遥, 李永亮, 董晴, 赵心念, 李晓宇, 金晓东, 王亚男, 田树军, 高玉红, 孙新胜. 发酵床对哺乳期湖羔羊生长、消化以及血液理化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 86-97. |
| [13] | 杨得玉, 黄文植, 冯宇哲, 薛斌, 张晓卫, 崔占鸿. 暖季补饲矿物质盐砖对放牧牦牛生长性能、瘤胃发酵、血液和被毛矿物质含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(7): 105-118. |
| [14] | 申迪, 曾子铭, 庞凯悦, 柴沙驼, 聂洪辛, 李毓敏, 廖扬, 王迅, 黄伟华, 刘书杰, 杨英魁, 王书祥. 低精料日粮和高精料日粮对牦牛生长性能和瘤胃菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5): 155-165. |
| [15] | 张瑞, 安雪姣, 李建烨, 卢曾奎, 牛春娥, 徐振飞, 张金霞, 耿智广, 岳耀敬, 杨博辉. 湖羊及其不同杂交组合生长性能、产肉性能及肌肉品质比较分析[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(3): 186-197. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||