草业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 22-33.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025375
收稿日期:2025-09-16
修回日期:2025-11-03
出版日期:2026-09-20
发布日期:2026-07-27
通讯作者:
秦燕
作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: mule119@163.com基金资助:
Yan-hao YU(
), Meng YAN, Yu-lin NIU, Yan QIN(
)
Received:2025-09-16
Revised:2025-11-03
Online:2026-09-20
Published:2026-07-27
Contact:
Yan QIN
摘要:
探明氮磷配施措施对寒生羊茅种子产量的影响,以期为种子生产提供理论依据和技术支撑。采用双因素随机区组试验设计,在环青海湖地区开展了连续两年的寒生羊茅施肥试验,设置4个氮肥水平和3个磷肥水平,对3龄和4龄寒生羊茅种子产量及构成因子与经济效益进行了测定和分析。结果表明:氮磷配施显著改善寒生羊茅农艺性状,株高、茎粗、干草产量及穗长较对照均有不同程度提升,其中株高在不同年份最优处理下分别达107.4、110.5 cm,茎粗最优处理下两年分别为1.1、1.3 mm,干草产量最优处理下两年分别达6.27、6.41 t·hm-2,穗长最优处理下两年分别为14.5、15.9 cm;氮磷配施同时显著调控种子产量构成因子,生殖枝数随施氮量的增加呈“先增后减”趋势,最优处理下较对照分别提升71.8%、49.6%,千粒重对磷肥响应显著,最优处理下较对照分别提升23.58%、13.98%,且相关性分析表明实际种子产量与生殖枝数、千粒重呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)关系;不同类型种子产量均受氮磷调控,潜在种子产量、表现种子产量、实际种子产量在各年份最优处理下较对照均有明显提升,其中实际种子产量 2023 年最优处理达0.92 t·hm-2,2024年最优处理达0.78 t·hm-2;经济效益方面,2023年最高增收达5.72×103 CNY·hm-2、最高肥料贡献率达38.96%,2024年最高增收达2.80×103 CNY·hm-2、最高肥料贡献率达 23.26%,且氮肥120 kg·hm-2与磷肥600 kg·hm-2配施处理两年经济效益均稳定高效;综合寒生羊茅种子产量及产量组分指标的隶属函数分析结果表明,氮肥120 kg·hm-2与磷肥600 kg·hm-2配施为研究区最优施肥方案。
余琰昊, 闫萌, 牛浴林, 秦燕. 氮磷运筹对环青海湖地区寒生羊茅种子生产的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(9): 22-33.
Yan-hao YU, Meng YAN, Yu-lin NIU, Yan QIN. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus management on seed production of Festuca kryloviana in the Qinghai Lake region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(9): 22-33.
处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0 | 0 | 0 | N2P0 | 120 | 0 |
| N0P1 | 0 | 300 | N2P1 | 120 | 300 |
| N0P2 | 0 | 600 | N2P2 | 120 | 600 |
| N1P0 | 60 | 0 | N3P0 | 180 | 0 |
| N1P1 | 60 | 300 | N3P1 | 180 | 300 |
| N1P2 | 60 | 600 | N3P2 | 180 | 600 |
表1 试验施肥处理
Table 1 Fertilizer treatments of the experiment (kg·hm-2)
处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0 | 0 | 0 | N2P0 | 120 | 0 |
| N0P1 | 0 | 300 | N2P1 | 120 | 300 |
| N0P2 | 0 | 600 | N2P2 | 120 | 600 |
| N1P0 | 60 | 0 | N3P0 | 180 | 0 |
| N1P1 | 60 | 300 | N3P1 | 180 | 300 |
| N1P2 | 60 | 600 | N3P2 | 180 | 600 |
因子 Factors | 株高Plant height | 茎粗Stem diameter | 干草产量Hay yield | 穗长Spike length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 27.931 | <0.001 | 49.085 | <0.001 | 7.987 | <0.001 | 1.701 | 0.167 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 4.112 | 0.017 | 5.526 | 0.005 | 0.167 | 0.847 | 3.741 | 0.025 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 29.026 | <0.001 | 65.652 | <0.001 | 6.704 | 0.011 | 35.282 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 2.613 | 0.018 | 4.673 | <0.001 | 1.961 | 0.075 | 6.000 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 3.786 | 0.011 | 4.036 | 0.008 | 0.632 | 0.595 | 4.730 | 0.003 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 0.345 | 0.708 | 4.736 | 0.010 | 0.484 | 0.617 | 0.407 | 0.666 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 1.280 | 0.266 | 0.367 | 0.899 | 0.810 | 0.564 | 1.748 | 0.110 |
表2 年际间不同氮磷添加下寒生羊茅农艺性状的方差分析
Table 2 Interannual analysis of variance (ANOVA) of agronomic traits in F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus additions
因子 Factors | 株高Plant height | 茎粗Stem diameter | 干草产量Hay yield | 穗长Spike length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 27.931 | <0.001 | 49.085 | <0.001 | 7.987 | <0.001 | 1.701 | 0.167 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 4.112 | 0.017 | 5.526 | 0.005 | 0.167 | 0.847 | 3.741 | 0.025 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 29.026 | <0.001 | 65.652 | <0.001 | 6.704 | 0.011 | 35.282 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 2.613 | 0.018 | 4.673 | <0.001 | 1.961 | 0.075 | 6.000 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 3.786 | 0.011 | 4.036 | 0.008 | 0.632 | 0.595 | 4.730 | 0.003 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 0.345 | 0.708 | 4.736 | 0.010 | 0.484 | 0.617 | 0.407 | 0.666 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 1.280 | 0.266 | 0.367 | 0.899 | 0.810 | 0.564 | 1.748 | 0.110 |
图 2 2023和2024年不同施肥处理下寒生羊茅的农艺性状不同大写字母表示同一磷水平下氮处理间差异显著,不同小写字母表示同一氮水平下磷处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among nitrogen treatments at the same phosphorus level, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among phosphorus treatments at the same nitrogen level (P<0.05).
Fig.2 Agronomic traits of F. kryloviana under different fertilization treatments in 2023 and 2024
因子 Factors | 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 小花数 Number of florets | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 26.758 | <0.001 | 4.655 | 0.004 | 2.041 | 0.112 | 4.050 | 0.009 | 8.251 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 3.071 | 0.050 | 41.967 | <0.001 | 60.192 | <0.001 | 10.523 | 0.002 | 3.626 | 0.030 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 18.999 | <0.001 | 43.130 | <0.001 | 59.184 | <0.001 | 10.170 | 0.002 | 123.208 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 1.132 | 0.348 | 0.363 | 0.901 | 1.225 | 0.298 | 0.296 | 0.938 | 1.996 | 0.072 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 6.363 | <0.001 | 0.817 | 0.487 | 3.040 | 0.032 | 0.737 | 0.532 | 3.937 | 0.010 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 3.207 | 0.044 | 0.187 | 0.829 | 1.683 | 0.190 | 0.950 | 0.390 | 2.640 | 0.076 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 3.522 | 0.003 | 1.009 | 0.423 | 0.784 | 0.584 | 0.550 | 0.769 | 1.698 | 0.127 |
表3 年际间不同氮磷添加下寒生羊茅种子产量构成要素的方差分析
Table 3 Interannual analysis of variance (ANOVA) of seed yield components of F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus additions
因子 Factors | 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 小花数 Number of florets | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 26.758 | <0.001 | 4.655 | 0.004 | 2.041 | 0.112 | 4.050 | 0.009 | 8.251 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 3.071 | 0.050 | 41.967 | <0.001 | 60.192 | <0.001 | 10.523 | 0.002 | 3.626 | 0.030 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 18.999 | <0.001 | 43.130 | <0.001 | 59.184 | <0.001 | 10.170 | 0.002 | 123.208 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 1.132 | 0.348 | 0.363 | 0.901 | 1.225 | 0.298 | 0.296 | 0.938 | 1.996 | 0.072 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 6.363 | <0.001 | 0.817 | 0.487 | 3.040 | 0.032 | 0.737 | 0.532 | 3.937 | 0.010 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 3.207 | 0.044 | 0.187 | 0.829 | 1.683 | 0.190 | 0.950 | 0.390 | 2.640 | 0.076 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 3.522 | 0.003 | 1.009 | 0.423 | 0.784 | 0.584 | 0.550 | 0.769 | 1.698 | 0.127 |
因子 Factors | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 12.979 | <0.001 | 8.817 | <0.001 | 16.431 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 6.722 | 0.004 | 4.984 | 0.015 | 0.934 | 0.406 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 5.336 | 0.029 | 2.916 | 0.100 | 2.438 | 0.131 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 0.379 | 0.886 | 0.339 | 0.910 | 3.807 | 0.007 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 0.811 | 0.500 | 0.351 | 0.789 | 2.083 | 0.127 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 2.500 | 0.102 | 0.396 | 0.677 | 0.643 | 0.534 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 0.819 | 0.525 | 0.773 | 0.553 | 1.024 | 0.413 |
表4 年际间不同氮磷添加下寒生羊茅种子产量的方差分析
Table 4 Interannual analysis of variance (ANOVA) of seed yield in F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus additions
因子 Factors | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 12.979 | <0.001 | 8.817 | <0.001 | 16.431 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 6.722 | 0.004 | 4.984 | 0.015 | 0.934 | 0.406 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 5.336 | 0.029 | 2.916 | 0.100 | 2.438 | 0.131 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 0.379 | 0.886 | 0.339 | 0.910 | 3.807 | 0.007 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 0.811 | 0.500 | 0.351 | 0.789 | 2.083 | 0.127 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 2.500 | 0.102 | 0.396 | 0.677 | 0.643 | 0.534 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 0.819 | 0.525 | 0.773 | 0.553 | 1.024 | 0.413 |
处理 Treatments | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| N0P0 (CK) | 857.31±144.46e | 1164.72±61.25d | 710.14±15.65d | 784.40±65.39d | 522.50±46.70c | 532.08±12.68fg |
| N0P1 | 885.48±156.31e | 1287.15±169.42cd | 689.31±73.85d | 909.92±130.20cd | 517.43±74.27c | 373.89±11.27h |
| N0P2 | 1434.13±226.98cd | 1398.54±139.93cd | 861.32±51.87d | 1117.25±93.70bcd | 497.20±103.79c | 488.40±11.11g |
| N1P0 | 1509.74±181.35bcd | 1696.27±349.99abcd | 1177.58±95.03c | 1295.52±237.57bc | 675.43±90.49bc | 603.86±21.09de |
| N1P1 | 1692.93±275.93abcd | 1402.58±78.48cd | 1474.89±143.84ab | 1089.22±48.66cd | 780.22±230.53ab | 604.70±25.08de |
| N1P2 | 1519.97±363.61bcd | 1766.02±231.33abcd | 1340.39±271.41bc | 1537.64±149.52ab | 645.83±96.99bc | 639.69±10.41cd |
| N2P0 | 1513.43±266.93bcd | 2125.72±172.60ab | 1217.86±83.11c | 1833.31±178.15a | 668.80±152.78bc | 720.00±17.08b |
| N2P1 | 2010.88±403.47a | 1972.63±182.13abc | 1483.46±175.66ab | 1535.56±111.99ab | 746.17±135.17ab | 682.54±19.31bc |
| N2P2 | 1575.40±213.18abcd | 2218.73±278.41a | 1174.39±115.77c | 1803.44±206.55a | 823.75±133.60ab | 781.46±23.64a |
| N3P0 | 1325.67±205.64d | 1468.02±150.83bcd | 1134.88±106.87c | 1128.43±103.50bcd | 919.17±336.73a | 574.60±16.79ef |
| N3P1 | 1798.34±157.54abc | 1864.74±191.77abcd | 1448.34±155.28b | 1292.63±110.95bc | 792.50±147.26ab | 657.27±14.50cd |
| N3P2 | 1946.87±361.48ab | 1745.01±147.28abcd | 1680.00±45.30a | 1267.24±126.17bc | 687.20±154.66bc | 735.34±31.27ab |
表5 氮磷肥配施对寒生羊茅潜在种子产量、表现种子产量和实际种子产量的影响
Table 5 Effects of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on the potential seed yield, expressed seed yield, and actual seed yield of F. kryloviana (kg·hm-2)
处理 Treatments | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| N0P0 (CK) | 857.31±144.46e | 1164.72±61.25d | 710.14±15.65d | 784.40±65.39d | 522.50±46.70c | 532.08±12.68fg |
| N0P1 | 885.48±156.31e | 1287.15±169.42cd | 689.31±73.85d | 909.92±130.20cd | 517.43±74.27c | 373.89±11.27h |
| N0P2 | 1434.13±226.98cd | 1398.54±139.93cd | 861.32±51.87d | 1117.25±93.70bcd | 497.20±103.79c | 488.40±11.11g |
| N1P0 | 1509.74±181.35bcd | 1696.27±349.99abcd | 1177.58±95.03c | 1295.52±237.57bc | 675.43±90.49bc | 603.86±21.09de |
| N1P1 | 1692.93±275.93abcd | 1402.58±78.48cd | 1474.89±143.84ab | 1089.22±48.66cd | 780.22±230.53ab | 604.70±25.08de |
| N1P2 | 1519.97±363.61bcd | 1766.02±231.33abcd | 1340.39±271.41bc | 1537.64±149.52ab | 645.83±96.99bc | 639.69±10.41cd |
| N2P0 | 1513.43±266.93bcd | 2125.72±172.60ab | 1217.86±83.11c | 1833.31±178.15a | 668.80±152.78bc | 720.00±17.08b |
| N2P1 | 2010.88±403.47a | 1972.63±182.13abc | 1483.46±175.66ab | 1535.56±111.99ab | 746.17±135.17ab | 682.54±19.31bc |
| N2P2 | 1575.40±213.18abcd | 2218.73±278.41a | 1174.39±115.77c | 1803.44±206.55a | 823.75±133.60ab | 781.46±23.64a |
| N3P0 | 1325.67±205.64d | 1468.02±150.83bcd | 1134.88±106.87c | 1128.43±103.50bcd | 919.17±336.73a | 574.60±16.79ef |
| N3P1 | 1798.34±157.54abc | 1864.74±191.77abcd | 1448.34±155.28b | 1292.63±110.95bc | 792.50±147.26ab | 657.27±14.50cd |
| N3P2 | 1946.87±361.48ab | 1745.01±147.28abcd | 1680.00±45.30a | 1267.24±126.17bc | 687.20±154.66bc | 735.34±31.27ab |
指标 Index | 种子产量 Seed yield | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | 生殖枝数 Number of reproductive branches | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 小花数 Number of florets | 穗长 Spike length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 种子产量Seed yield | 1.000 | 0.298** | 0.373** | -0.046 | 0.289** | 0.299** | -0.059 |
| 千粒重1000-seed weight | 1.000 | -0.078 | -0.152* | 0.094 | 0.224** | -0.036 | |
| 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 1.000 | 0.228** | 0.168* | -0.050 | 0.050 | ||
| 小穗数Number of spikelet | 1.000 | -0.235** | -0.286** | 0.458** | |||
| 每穗粒数Number of grains per panicle | 1.000 | 0.389** | -0.049 | ||||
| 小花数Number of florets | 1.000 | 0.192** |
表6 寒生羊茅种子产量性状相关性分析
Table 6 Correlation analysis of seed yield traits in F. kryloviana
指标 Index | 种子产量 Seed yield | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | 生殖枝数 Number of reproductive branches | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 小花数 Number of florets | 穗长 Spike length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 种子产量Seed yield | 1.000 | 0.298** | 0.373** | -0.046 | 0.289** | 0.299** | -0.059 |
| 千粒重1000-seed weight | 1.000 | -0.078 | -0.152* | 0.094 | 0.224** | -0.036 | |
| 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 1.000 | 0.228** | 0.168* | -0.050 | 0.050 | ||
| 小穗数Number of spikelet | 1.000 | -0.235** | -0.286** | 0.458** | |||
| 每穗粒数Number of grains per panicle | 1.000 | 0.389** | -0.049 | ||||
| 小花数Number of florets | 1.000 | 0.192** |
| 年份Year | 处理Treatments | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | 平均值Average | 排名Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | N0P0 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.138 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.069 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.362 | 0.216 | 0.133 | 0.010 | 0.467 | 0.000 | 0.057 | 0.178 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.000 | 0.274 | 0.517 | 0.647 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.407 | 0.264 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.639 | 0.379 | 0.540 | 0.780 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.406 | 0.549 | 8 | |
| N1P1 | 0.709 | 0.345 | 0.762 | 0.950 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 0.533 | 0.566 | 6 | |
| N1P2 | 0.591 | 0.328 | 0.946 | 1.000 | 0.133 | 0.000 | 0.349 | 0.478 | 9 | |
| N2P0 | 0.477 | 0.482 | 0.401 | 0.972 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.211 | 0.649 | 3 | |
| N2P1 | 0.634 | 0.520 | 0.803 | 0.246 | 0.400 | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0.554 | 7 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.825 | 0.697 | 0.467 | 0.667 | 0.676 | 0.762 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.661 | 0.650 | 0.740 | 0.000 | 0.467 | 0.833 | 0.673 | 0.575 | 5 | |
| N3P1 | 0.698 | 0.266 | 1.000 | 0.710 | 0.467 | 0.389 | 0.549 | 0.583 | 4 | |
| N3P2 | 0.598 | 0.446 | 0.919 | 0.991 | 0.533 | 0.722 | 0.774 | 0.712 | 2 | |
| 2024 | N0P0 | 0.388 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.210 | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.081 | 0.115 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.000 | 0.248 | 0.307 | 0.541 | 0.124 | 0.062 | 0.002 | 0.183 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.281 | 0.378 | 0.807 | 0.369 | 0.124 | 0.625 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.564 | 0.720 | 0.886 | 0.000 | 0.742 | 0.437 | 0.317 | 0.524 | 7 | |
| N1P1 | 0.566 | 0.413 | 0.627 | 0.318 | 0.247 | 0.188 | 0.398 | 0.394 | 9 | |
| N1P2 | 0.652 | 0.503 | 0.730 | 0.522 | 0.000 | 0.625 | 0.517 | 0.507 | 8 | |
| N2P0 | 0.849 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.459 | 0.618 | 0.750 | 0.866 | 0.792 | 2 | |
| N2P1 | 0.757 | 0.865 | 0.429 | 0.739 | 0.989 | 1.000 | 0.549 | 0.761 | 3 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 0.975 | 0.999 | 0.510 | 1.000 | 0.625 | 1.000 | 0.873 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.492 | 0.743 | 0.534 | 0.223 | 0.618 | 0.688 | 0.435 | 0.533 | 6 | |
| N3P1 | 0.695 | 0.486 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 0.865 | 0.188 | 0.383 | 0.604 | 5 | |
| N3P2 | 0.887 | 0.897 | 0.560 | 0.427 | 0.618 | 0.500 | 0.373 | 0.609 | 4 |
表 7 不同氮磷添加对寒生羊茅种子产量及构成因素的隶属函数值排名
Table 7 Ranking of membership function values for seed yield and its components of F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization additions
| 年份Year | 处理Treatments | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | 平均值Average | 排名Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | N0P0 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.138 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.069 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.362 | 0.216 | 0.133 | 0.010 | 0.467 | 0.000 | 0.057 | 0.178 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.000 | 0.274 | 0.517 | 0.647 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.407 | 0.264 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.639 | 0.379 | 0.540 | 0.780 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.406 | 0.549 | 8 | |
| N1P1 | 0.709 | 0.345 | 0.762 | 0.950 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 0.533 | 0.566 | 6 | |
| N1P2 | 0.591 | 0.328 | 0.946 | 1.000 | 0.133 | 0.000 | 0.349 | 0.478 | 9 | |
| N2P0 | 0.477 | 0.482 | 0.401 | 0.972 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.211 | 0.649 | 3 | |
| N2P1 | 0.634 | 0.520 | 0.803 | 0.246 | 0.400 | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0.554 | 7 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.825 | 0.697 | 0.467 | 0.667 | 0.676 | 0.762 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.661 | 0.650 | 0.740 | 0.000 | 0.467 | 0.833 | 0.673 | 0.575 | 5 | |
| N3P1 | 0.698 | 0.266 | 1.000 | 0.710 | 0.467 | 0.389 | 0.549 | 0.583 | 4 | |
| N3P2 | 0.598 | 0.446 | 0.919 | 0.991 | 0.533 | 0.722 | 0.774 | 0.712 | 2 | |
| 2024 | N0P0 | 0.388 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.210 | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.081 | 0.115 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.000 | 0.248 | 0.307 | 0.541 | 0.124 | 0.062 | 0.002 | 0.183 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.281 | 0.378 | 0.807 | 0.369 | 0.124 | 0.625 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.564 | 0.720 | 0.886 | 0.000 | 0.742 | 0.437 | 0.317 | 0.524 | 7 | |
| N1P1 | 0.566 | 0.413 | 0.627 | 0.318 | 0.247 | 0.188 | 0.398 | 0.394 | 9 | |
| N1P2 | 0.652 | 0.503 | 0.730 | 0.522 | 0.000 | 0.625 | 0.517 | 0.507 | 8 | |
| N2P0 | 0.849 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.459 | 0.618 | 0.750 | 0.866 | 0.792 | 2 | |
| N2P1 | 0.757 | 0.865 | 0.429 | 0.739 | 0.989 | 1.000 | 0.549 | 0.761 | 3 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 0.975 | 0.999 | 0.510 | 1.000 | 0.625 | 1.000 | 0.873 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.492 | 0.743 | 0.534 | 0.223 | 0.618 | 0.688 | 0.435 | 0.533 | 6 | |
| N3P1 | 0.695 | 0.486 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 0.865 | 0.188 | 0.383 | 0.604 | 5 | |
| N3P2 | 0.887 | 0.897 | 0.560 | 0.427 | 0.618 | 0.500 | 0.373 | 0.609 | 4 |
处理 Treatments | 2023 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | 经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | |
| N0P0 | 8967.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9256.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| N0P1 | 8191.45 | -776.05 | -9.47 | 6379.78 | -2876.42 | -45.08 |
| N0P2 | 7629.43 | -1338.07 | -17.54 | 7656.00 | -1600.20 | -20.90 |
| N1P0 | 11154.02 | 2186.52 | 19.60 | 10173.90 | 917.70 | 9.02 |
| N1P1 | 12398.55 | 3431.05 | 27.67 | 9739.50 | 483.30 | 4.96 |
| N1P2 | 9711.45 | 743.95 | 7.66 | 9799.35 | 543.15 | 5.54 |
| N2P0 | 10671.43 | 1703.93 | 15.97 | 11798.00 | 2541.80 | 21.54 |
| N2P1 | 11647.69 | 2680.19 | 23.01 | 10709.85 | 1453.65 | 13.57 |
| N2P2 | 12724.25 | 3756.75 | 29.52 | 12062.40 | 2806.20 | 23.26 |
| N3P0 | 14690.98 | 5723.48 | 38.96 | 9509.57 | 253.37 | 2.66 |
| N3P1 | 12143.25 | 3175.75 | 26.15 | 10475.34 | 1219.14 | 11.63 |
| N3P2 | 10460.00 | 1492.50 | 14.27 | 11222.10 | 1965.90 | 17.52 |
表8 不同氮磷添加对寒生羊茅种子经济效益的影响
Table 8 Effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus additions on the economic benefits of F. kryloviana seeds
处理 Treatments | 2023 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | 经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | |
| N0P0 | 8967.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9256.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| N0P1 | 8191.45 | -776.05 | -9.47 | 6379.78 | -2876.42 | -45.08 |
| N0P2 | 7629.43 | -1338.07 | -17.54 | 7656.00 | -1600.20 | -20.90 |
| N1P0 | 11154.02 | 2186.52 | 19.60 | 10173.90 | 917.70 | 9.02 |
| N1P1 | 12398.55 | 3431.05 | 27.67 | 9739.50 | 483.30 | 4.96 |
| N1P2 | 9711.45 | 743.95 | 7.66 | 9799.35 | 543.15 | 5.54 |
| N2P0 | 10671.43 | 1703.93 | 15.97 | 11798.00 | 2541.80 | 21.54 |
| N2P1 | 11647.69 | 2680.19 | 23.01 | 10709.85 | 1453.65 | 13.57 |
| N2P2 | 12724.25 | 3756.75 | 29.52 | 12062.40 | 2806.20 | 23.26 |
| N3P0 | 14690.98 | 5723.48 | 38.96 | 9509.57 | 253.37 | 2.66 |
| N3P1 | 12143.25 | 3175.75 | 26.15 | 10475.34 | 1219.14 | 11.63 |
| N3P2 | 10460.00 | 1492.50 | 14.27 | 11222.10 | 1965.90 | 17.52 |
| [1] | Qiu J. China: the third pole. Nature, 2008, 454(7203): 393-396. |
| [2] | Immerzeel W W, Lutz A F, Andrade M, et al. Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature, 2020, 577(7790): 364-369. |
| [3] | Shi Z H, Liang G L, Liu W H, et al. Overview of research on the adaptability of Festuca ovina in alpine regions. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2019, 49(2): 61-63. |
| 石正海, 梁国玲, 刘文辉, 等. 西北羊茅在高寒地区的适应性研究概况. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2019, 49(2): 61-63. | |
| [4] | Bartzialis D, Giannoulis K D, Gintsioudis I, et al. Assessing the efficiency of different nitrogen fertilization levels on sorghum yield and quality characteristics. Agriculture, 2023, 13(6): 1253. |
| [5] | Peçanha D A, Freitas M S M, Vieira M E, et al. Phosphorus fertilization affects growth, essential oil yield and quality of true lavender in Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 170: 113803. |
| [6] | Zhou Y, Li Z Y, Li Y Q, et al. Moderate deep banding of phosphorus enhanced winter wheat yield and fertilizer uptake efficiency by promoting nutrient absorption and translocation of pre-anthesis nutrient. Field Crops Research, 2025, 322: 109728. |
| [7] | Zhang B B, Wang Y J, Liu H J, et al. Optimal phosphorus management strategies to enhance crop productivity and soil phosphorus fertility in rapeseed-rice rotation. Chemosphere, 2023, 337: 139392. |
| [8] | Liu Q L, Wang X J, Wang J L, et al. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus combined application on forage yield of Elymus sibiricus in an alpine region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 193-202. |
| 刘启林, 王小军, 王金兰, 等. 氮磷配施对高寒区老芒麦饲草产量的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(6): 193-202. | |
| [9] | Zhao J J, Zheng W, Zhou D Y, et al. Effect of endophytic diazotroph on yield and photochemical efficiency of alfalfa under different nitrogen application levels. Pratacultural Science, 2025, 42(4): 980-990. |
| 赵晶晶, 郑伟, 周道媛, 等. 不同施氮水平下植物内生固氮菌对紫花苜蓿产量及光化学效率的影响. 草业科学, 2025, 42(4): 980-990. | |
| [10] | Chen L, Wang X L, Mao J P, et al. Dynamic changes of fruit development and comprehensive quality evaluation of different yellow-flesh kiwifruit cultivars. Non-wood Forest Research, 2024, 42(1): 220-231. |
| 陈璐, 王小玲, 毛积鹏, 等. 不同黄肉猕猴桃品种果实发育动态变化及品质综合评价. 经济林研究, 2024, 42(1): 220-231. | |
| [11] | Shen Q R. Soil and fertilizer sciences. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2021. |
| 沈其荣. 土壤肥料学通论. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2021. | |
| [12] | Hao H C. Characterization and health assessment of tobacco-planting soils in tobacco-rice rotation in Chenzhou. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2025. |
| 郝汉驰. 郴州烟稻轮作植烟土壤特征与健康评价. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2025. | |
| [13] | Xu Z H, Yu H Y, Yang H, et al. The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer combined application on the yield and nutrition value in vegetative growth and reproductive growth stages of local Elymus sibiricus. China Feed, 2024(19):137-145. |
| 徐正辉, 俞慧云, 杨浩, 等. 营养及生殖生长关键期氮磷肥配施对老芒麦产草量及营养价值的影响. 中国饲料, 2024(19):137-145. | |
| [14] | Zhang X J, Wei J J, Chen C J, et al. Optimization of annual nitrogen fertilizer application to increase the productivity of a forage triticale-silage maize multiple cropping system in an irrigated area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 38-52. |
| 张晓娟, 魏娇娇, 陈彩锦, 等. 氮肥周年优化对灌区饲用小黑麦-青贮玉米复种系统生产力的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 38-52. | |
| [15] | Xiao A P, Ma R, Wang B, et al. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on seed yield and its components of Stipa bungeana. Pratacultural Science, 2026, 43(2): 321-333. |
| 肖爱萍, 马榕, 王斌, 等. 氮磷钾配施对长芒草种子生产性能和发芽特性的影响. 草业科学, 2026, 43(2): 321-333. | |
| [16] | Yu A, Yang F, Zhang Y, et al. Influences of different phosphorus concentrations on the root distribution of Stylosanthes and black seed Paspalum. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 219-224. |
| 余爱, 杨帆, 张宇, 等. 不同施磷浓度对柱花草和黑籽雀稗根系分布的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 219-224. | |
| [17] | Yu X N, Zhu P, Mao P S. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer applications on roots and seed yield of Elymus sibiricus. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(4): 637-643. |
| 于晓娜, 朱萍, 毛培胜. 氮磷处理对老芒麦根系及种子产量的影响. 草地学报, 2011, 19(4): 637-643. | |
| [18] | Shi Z H, Liu W H, Zhang Y C, et al. Combined application of phosphorus fertilizer and super absorbent polymer with low nitrogen fertilizer rate enhanced seed yield of Festuca kryloviana Reverd. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(11): 1967-1976. |
| 石正海, 刘文辉, 张永超, 等. 增磷减氮配合保水剂可提高多年生西北羊茅种子产量. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(11): 1967-1976. | |
| [19] | Bao G S, Zhou Q P, Han Z L. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of oat. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(10): 48-53. |
| 鲍根生, 周青平, 韩志林. 氮、钾不同配比施肥对燕麦产量和品质的影响. 草业科学, 2008, 25(10): 48-53. | |
| [20] | Zuo Y. Effect of fertilizer application type on seed yield and its constitutive factors in three fescue varieties (lines). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2022. |
| 左岩. 施肥种类对3个羊茅品种(系)种子产量及其构成因子的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022. | |
| [21] | Shi Z H. The seed formation and biomass distribution response of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in alpine region for the Festuca ovina. Xining: Qinghai University, 2020. |
| 石正海. 高寒地区羊茅种子形成和生物量分配对氮磷肥的响应. 西宁: 青海大学, 2020. | |
| [22] | Shi Z H, Liu W H, Zhang Y C, et al. Seasonal nitrogen and phosphorus co-application enhances productivity of Festuca kryloviana cv. Huanhu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 149-158. |
| 石正海, 刘文辉, 张永超, 等. 季节性氮磷配施提升环湖寒生羊茅生产性能. 草业学报, 2024, 33(1): 149-158. | |
| [23] | Song J C. Effect of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on seed yield, quality of Elymus nutans and soil properties of grassland in alpine region. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2022. |
| 宋建超. 氮磷钾肥配施对高寒区垂穗披碱草种子产量、质量和土壤特性的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2022. | |
| [24] | Bi Y X, Yang G W, Wei Y Q, et al. Low legume-grass seeding ratio combined with phosphorus fertilization promotes forage yield and soil quality in managed grasslands. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2024, 44(4): 36. |
| [25] | Shi Y J, Gao S, Zhou D H, et al. Fall nitrogen application increases seed yield, forage yield and nitrogen use efficiency more than spring nitrogen application in Leymus chinensis, a perennial grass. Field Crops Research, 2017, 214: 66-72. |
| [26] | Wang Y T, Xie J H, Fan F, et al. Phosphorus fertilization enhanced overwintering, root system and forage yield of late-seeded alfalfa in sodic soils. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 18090. |
| [27] | Wang X Y, Cao W X, Wang X J, et al. Herbage production and forage quality responses to cutting height and fertilization of legume-grass mixtures in the Hexi region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. |
| 王辛有, 曹文侠, 王小军, 等. 河西地区豆禾混播草地生产性能对刈割高度与施肥的响应. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. | |
| [28] | Su M, Liu Q J, Zhang Z Z, et al. The impact of nitrogen application on antioxidant characteristics of dryland potato leaves and yield in the mountainous region of southern Ningxia, China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(8): 1341-1354. |
| 苏明, 柳强娟, 张正珍, 等. 施氮量对宁夏南部山区旱地马铃薯叶片抗氧化特性及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2024, 32(8): 1341-1354. | |
| [29] | Chtouki M, Laaziz F, Naciri R, et al. Interactive effect of soil moisture content and phosphorus fertilizer form on chickpea growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 6671. |
| [30] | Song J C, Yu X J, Wei K T, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on production performance and nutritional quality of Elymus nutans in alpine region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564. |
| 宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 等. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564. | |
| [31] | Law C N, Snape J W, Worland A J. The genetical relationship between height and yield in wheat. Heredity, 1978, 40(1): 133-151. |
| [32] | Zhou W. Study on the effect of wheat field with various foliar fertilizers. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2018. |
| 周巍. 多种叶面肥的小麦田间效果研究. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2018. | |
| [33] | Wen Z R, Liu H S, Xing G W, et al. Effects of chemical control agents and spraying time on stalk traits and yield formation of summer maize. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(22): 50-55. |
| 文章荣, 刘汉松, 邢国文, 等. 化控剂和喷施时期对夏玉米茎秆性状和产量形成的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(22): 50-55. | |
| [34] | Sun T J, Mao P C, Wang C, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and plant growth regulator on fertile tiller development of spring tiller in Phleum pratense. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(9): 37-44. |
| 孙铁军, 毛培春, 王超, 等. 氮肥与生长调节剂对猫尾草春季分蘖生殖转化的影响. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(9): 37-44. | |
| [35] | Tian G L, Zhou Y, Sun B, et al. Effects of nitrogen and transplanting density on the mechanisms of tillering dynamic of rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 896-904. |
| 田广丽, 周毅, 孙博, 等. 氮素及栽培密度影响水稻分蘖动态的机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4): 896-904. | |
| [36] | Wang M Y, Mao P S. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on seed yield, seed yield components and canopy NDVI of Elymus sibiricus. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(4): 683-688. |
| 王明亚, 毛培胜. 施氮、磷肥对老芒麦种子产量、产量组分及成熟期冠层NDVI值的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(4): 683-688. | |
| [37] | Chen X X, Zhang W, Liang X Y, et al. Physiological and developmental traits associated with the grain yield of winter wheat as affected by phosphorus fertilizer management. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 16580. |
| [38] | Chen D D, Li Q, Liu Z, et al. Effects of 9 forage species on soil properties in the alpine pastoral region of Qinghai Province. Grassland and Turf, 2016, 36(4): 41-47. |
| 陈懂懂, 李奇, 刘哲, 等. 9种牧草对青海同德牧区土壤特性的影响. 草原与草坪, 2016, 36(4): 41-47. | |
| [39] | Chen Z H, Han J G, Chen H M, et al. Effect of fertilization-N on tall fescue seed yield and yield components of seed crop. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2005, 13(3): 215-218. |
| 陈志宏, 韩建国, 陈会敏, 等. 施氮对高羊茅种子产量组分和产量的影响. 草地学报, 2005, 13(3): 215-218. |
| [1] | 苏志刚, 韩有健, 张建杭, 武俊喜, 徐雅梅, 包赛很那null, 苗彦军, 曹仲华. 施氮量与播种量对‘巴青’垂穗披碱草种子产量及质量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(7): 175-187. |
| [2] | 项凌飞, 张峰举, 李跃, 王学琴, 刘金龙, 马巧利. 不同行距和播量对盐碱地湖南稷子饲草及种子产量和质量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(5): 126-138. |
| [3] | 邓文辉, 赵小娜, 雍嘉仪, 管思雨, 胡国强, 王腾飞, 胡海英. 行比和燕麦密度对苜蓿种子产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(4): 100-111. |
| [4] | 王一博, 明雪花, 张建勇, 袁琦, 杜建明, 王斌, 王腾飞, 张译尹, 兰剑, 牟乐. 宁夏干旱区燕麦新种质生产性能和种子产量综合评价研究[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(4): 86-99. |
| [5] | 李瑒琨, 本转林, 张筠钰, 杨惠敏. 不同气候和土壤条件下施肥类型影响紫花苜蓿种子产量的整合分析[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(2): 54-67. |
| [6] | 张译尹, 肖爱萍, 王斌, 王腾飞, 胡海英, 兰剑. 饲用高粱/拉巴豆混播模式下施氮量对草地生产力和能量利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(1): 40-52. |
| [7] | 俞鸿千, 马雪鹏, 曾翰国, 单晓艳, 李曼莉, 王占军. 地下滴灌时期和水量对紫花苜蓿种子生产的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(1): 53-64. |
| [8] | 王红林, 文斌, 左艳春, 张凯, 吴子周, 严旭, 袁正才, 邓榆川, 肖蔹, 陈慧, 寇晶, 傅祥超, 杜周和. 全株饲料桑添加量对川白獭兔幼兔肠道形态、血液生化指标、肌肉中氨基酸含量及经济效益的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(8): 199-210. |
| [9] | 张译尹, 王斌, 王腾飞, 兰剑, 胡海英. 苜蓿种子田间作小黑麦对饲草产量、水分利用及苜蓿种子产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(8): 43-53. |
| [10] | 樊文娟, 宋建超, 张小娟, 盛宇航, 史金涛, 张龙骥, 鱼小军. 氮磷配施对甘肃省武威灌区扁蓿豆种子产量和质量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(8): 54-65. |
| [11] | 刘启林, 王小军, 王金兰, 刘文辉, 马巧玲, 李建辉, 张生原, 曹文侠, 李文. 氮磷配施对高寒区老芒麦饲草产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(6): 193-202. |
| [12] | 刘耀博, 裴渌, 刘琛琢, 李晓霞, 邹博坤. 基于Meta分析中国老芒麦种子产量和产量组分对施肥的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(6): 85-98. |
| [13] | 王腾飞, 马霞, 刘金龙, 王斌, 张译尹, 李佳旺, 马江萍, 王小兵, 兰剑. 引黄灌区复种饲用燕麦种植模式产量、品质及经济效益分析[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 27-37. |
| [14] | 王凤宇, 梁国玲, 胡泽龙, 刘文辉. 地理因子对青藏高原野生垂穗披碱草表型及种子产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(11): 198-214. |
| [15] | 廖小琴, 王长庭, 刘丹, 唐国, 毛军. 氮磷配施对高寒草甸植物根系特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(7): 160-174. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||