高原鼠兔对高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性关系的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2021444

草业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 25-35.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021444

高原鼠兔对高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性关系的影响

段媛媛¹(), 张静¹, 王玲玲¹, 刘彩凤¹, 王乙茉¹, 周俗², 郭正刚¹()

^1.兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室，兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室，兰州大学草地农业教育部工程研究中心，兰州大学草地农业科技学院，甘肃兰州 730020
^2.四川省草原科学研究院，四川成都 611731

收稿日期:2021-11-30 修回日期:2022-02-28 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-10-01
通讯作者: 郭正刚
作者简介:E-mail： guozhg@lzu.edu.cn
段媛媛（1999-），女，甘肃平凉人，在读博士。E-mail： duanyy2021@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32171675);西藏草业时空拓展技术模式创新与示范(XZ202101ZD003N);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(lzujbky-2020-it12)

Effects of plateau pika on the relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine meadow

Yuan-yuan DUAN¹(), Jing ZHANG¹, Ling-ling WANG¹, Cai-feng LIU¹, Yi-mo WANG¹, Su ZHOU², Zheng-gang GUO¹()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems，Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation，Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs，Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry，Ministry of Education，College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology，Lanzhou University，Lanzhou 730020，China
^2.Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences，Chengdu 611731，China

Received:2021-11-30 Revised:2022-02-28 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-10-01
Contact: Zheng-gang GUO

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

草地植物物种多样性和功能多样性的关系会因环境改变而变化。高原鼠兔干扰往往会改变其巢域范围内高寒草甸的水热过程，但尚不清楚其是否影响高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性的关系。本研究在甘肃碌曲、青海祁连和共和县同步选择调查区，每个调查区采用配对设置样地的方法，分析了高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性关系的影响。结果表明：高原鼠兔干扰显著增加了物种丰富度指数和物种多样性指数，而没有明显影响物种均匀度指数。高原鼠兔干扰显著增加了功能丰富度指数（P<0.05），但没有显著影响功能均匀度指数和功能离散度指数。高原鼠兔干扰促进植物功能丰富度指数与物种丰富度指数的关系从对数函数关系转变为二次函数关系，植物功能均匀度指数与物种均匀度指数的关系从不显著相关变为显著正相关；高原鼠兔干扰显著减弱了植物功能丰富度指数与物种丰富度指数、植物功能丰富度指数和物种多样性指数间的正相关性、植物功能离散度指数与物种丰富度指数的负相关性，增加了植物功能离散度指数和植物物种多样性指数间的负相关性。这为解读高原鼠兔干扰下植物群落物种共存机制提供了基础信息，有助于了解高原鼠兔干扰下植物多样性影响高寒草甸生态系统功能的途径。

关键词: 高原鼠兔干扰, 高寒草甸, 植物物种多样性, 植物功能多样性

Abstract:

The relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in grassland will change with environmental changes. The plateau pika （Ochotona curzoniae） has an effect on the hydrothermal process of alpine meadow in its nesting area. However， it is not clear whether the disturbance of plateau pika effects the relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine meadow. A random stratified and paired design was used to select plots in Luqu county in Gansu Province， and Qilian and Gonghe Counties in Qinghai Province and a field survey was conducted to investigate the effects of plateau pika disturbance on the relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity of the alpine meadow. It was found that plateau pika disturbance significantly increased the plant species richness index and the species diversity index but did not significantly affect the species evenness index. Plateau pika disturbance significantly increased plant functional richness index （P<0.05） but had no significant effect on the plant functional evenness index or the functional divergence index. With plateau pika disturbance effects， the relationship between plant functional richness index and species richness index changed from a logarithmic function to a quadratic function， and the relationship between plant functional evenness index and species evenness index changed from non-significant to significantly positive. In addition， positive correlations between functional richness index and species richness index， and functional richness index and species diversity index were significantly decreased， as were negative correlations between functional divergence index and species richness index， and functional divergence index and species diversity index were significantly decreased. The findings of this study provide basic information for understanding the mechanism of species coexistence of plant communities under plateau pika disturbance and help understanding of how plant diversity effects in an alpine meadow ecosystem function under plateau pika disturbance.

Key words: plateau pika disturbance, alpine meadow, plant species diversity, plant functional diversity

段媛媛, 张静, 王玲玲, 刘彩凤, 王乙茉, 周俗, 郭正刚. 高原鼠兔对高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性关系的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 25-35.

Yuan-yuan DUAN, Jing ZHANG, Ling-ling WANG, Cai-feng LIU, Yi-mo WANG, Su ZHOU, Zheng-gang GUO. Effects of plateau pika on the relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 25-35.

图/表 3

参考文献 36

1	Catorci A， Cesaretti S， Malatesta L， et al. Effects of grazing vs mowing on the functional diversity of sub-Mediterranean productive grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science， 2014， 17（4）： 658-669.
2	Hu G， Jin Y， Liu J L， et al. Functional diversity versus species diversity： Relationships with habitat heterogeneity at multiple scales in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Ecological Research， 2014， 29（5）： 897-903.
3	Dong S K， Tang L， Zhang X F， et al. Relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica， 2017， 37（5）： 1472-1483.
	董世魁，汤琳，张相锋，等. 高寒草地植物物种多样性与功能多样性的关系. 生态学报， 2017， 37（5）： 1472-1483.
4	Liu M X， Nan X N， Zhang G J， et al. Relationship between species diversity and functional diversity of plant communities on different slopes in alpine meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica， 2021， 4（13）： 1-11.
	刘旻霞，南笑宁，张国娟，等. 高寒草甸不同坡向植物群落物种多样性与功能多样性的关系. 生态学报， 2021， 4（13）： 1-11.
5	Biswas S R， Mallik A U. Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology， 2010， 91（1）： 28-35.
6	Bu W S， Zang R G， Ding Y. Functional diversity increases with species diversity along successional gradient in a secondary tropical lowland rainforest. Tropical Ecology， 2014， 55（3）： 393-401.
7	Kong B B， Wei X H， Du J L， et al. Effects of clipping and fertilization on the temporal dynamics of species diversity and functional diversity and their relationships in an alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology， 2016， 40（3）： 187-199.
	孔彬彬，卫欣华，杜家丽，等. 刈割和施肥对高寒草甸物种多样性和功能多样性时间动态及其关系的影响. 植物生态学报， 2016， 40（3）： 187-199.
8	Chen C， Zhu Z H， Li Y N， et al. Effects of interspecific trait dissimilarity and species evenness on the relationship between species diversity and functional diversity in an alpine meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica， 2016， 36（3）： 661-674．
	陈超，朱志红，李英年，等. 高寒草甸种间性状差异和物种均匀度对物种多样性与功能多样性关系的影响. 生态学报， 2016， 36（3）： 661-674.
9	Niu K C， He J S， Zhang S T， et al. Grazing increases functional richness but not functional divergence in Tibetan alpine meadow plant communities. Biodiversity and Conservation， 2016， 25（12）： 2441-2452.
10	Zhang X N， Li Y， He X M， et al. Effects of soil water and salinity on relationships between desert plant functional diversity and species diversity. Chinese Journal of Ecology， 2019， 38（8）： 2354-2360.
	张雪妮，李岩，何学敏，等. 水盐变化对荒漠植物功能多样性与物种多样性关系的影响. 生态学杂志， 2019， 38（8）： 2354-2360.
11	Smith A T， Foggin M J. The plateau pika （Ochotona curzoniae） is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan Plateau. Animal Conservation， 2010， 2（4）： 235-240.
12	Fan N C， Zhou W Y， Wei W H， et al. Rodent pest management in the Qinghai-Tibet alpine meadow ecosystem//Singleton G R， Hinds L A， Leirs H， et al. Ecologically-Based rodent management. Canberra： Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research， 1999： 285-304.
13	Pang X P， Guo Z G. Plateau pika disturbances alter plant productivity and soil nutrients in alpine meadows of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau， China. The Rangeland Journal， 2017， 39（2）： 133-144.
14	Xu H P， Yu C， Shu C C， et al. The effect of plateau pika disturbance on plant community diversity and stability in an alpine meadow. Acta Prataculturae Sinica， 2019， 28（5）： 90-99.
	徐海鹏，于成，舒朝成，等. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草甸植物群落多样性和稳定性的影响. 草业学报， 2019， 28（5）： 90-99.
15	Song X Z， Mimawangdui. Characteristics of communities of disturbance and undisturbance by plateau pika in an alpine meadow ecosystem. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science， 2021（7）： 28-34.
	宋璇紫，米玛旺堆. 高寒草甸生态系统中高原鼠兔干扰与非干扰的植物群落特征差异研究. 黑龙江农业科学， 2021（7）： 28-34.
16	Yu Q， Yi S， Ding Y， et al. Effect of plateau pikas disturbance and patchiness on ecosystem carbon emission of alpine meadow on the northeastern part of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Biogeosciences， 2019， 16（6）： 1097-1109.
17	Liu W L， Ma Y J， Wu Y N， et al. Effects of plateau pika’s disturbance on soil moisture characteristics of different land surface types in Qinghai Lake watershed. Science of Soil and Water Conservation， 2017， 15（2）： 62-69.
	刘文玲，马育军，吴艺楠，等. 青海湖流域高原鼠兔扰动对不同地表类型土壤水分特征的影响. 中国水土保持科学， 2017， 15（2）： 62-69.
18	Pang X P， Guo Z G. Effects of plateau pika disturbance levels on the plant diversity and biomass of an alpine meadow. Grassland Science， 2018， 64（3）： 159-166.
19	Zhang W N， Wang Q， Zhang J， et al. Clipping by plateau pikas and impacts to plant community. Rangeland Ecology and Management， 2020， 73（3）： 368-374.
20	Jin S H， Liu T， Pang X P， et al. Effect of plateau pika（Ochotona crzoniae） disturbance on plant species diversity and aboveground plant biomass in a Kobresia pygmaea meadow in the Qinghai Lake Region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica， 2017， 26（5）： 29-39.
	金少红，刘彤，庞晓攀，等. 高原鼠兔干扰对青海湖流域高山嵩草草甸植物多样性及地上生物量的影响. 草业学报， 2017， 26（5）： 29-39.
21	Liu Y H， Zhao H X. Advances in theory of disturbance and species diversity preservation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University， 2000（4）： 101-105.
	刘艳红，赵惠勋. 干扰与物种多样性维持理论研究进展. 北京林业大学学报， 2000（4）： 101-105.
22	Canals R M， Herman D J， Firestone M K. How disturbance by fossorial mammals alters N cycling in a California annual grassland. Ecology， 2003， 84（4）： 875-881.
23	Li X， Nie Y， Song X， et al. Patterns of species diversity and functional diversity along the southto north-facing slope gradient in a sub-alpine meadow. Community Ecology， 2011， 12（2）： 179-187.
24	Carreo R G， Pea C M， Bongers F， et al. Effects of disturbance intensity on species and functional diversity in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology， 2012， 100（6）： 1453-1463.
25	Mason N W H， Mouillot D， Lee W G， et al. Functional richness， functional evenness and functional divergence： The primary components of functional diversity. Oikos， 2005， 111（1）： 112-118.
26	Gong Z T. Chinese soil taxonomy. Beijing： Science Press， 2001.
	龚子同. 中国土壤系统分类. 北京：科学出版社， 2001.
27	Chinese Academy of Sciences Flora of the People’s Republic of China. Flora of the People’s Republic of China （Volume 1）. Beijing： Science Press， 2004.
	中国科学院中国植物志委员会. 中国植物志（第一卷）. 北京：科学出版社， 2004.
28	Tang Z， Zhang Y， Cong N， et al. Spatial pattern of pika holes and their effects on vegetation coverage on the Tibetan Plateau： An analysis using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Ecological Indicators， 2019， 107： 105551.
29	Pang X P， Wang Q， Guo Z G. The impact of the plateau pika on the relationship between plant aboveground biomass and plant species richness. Land Degradation and Development， 2020， 32（3）： 1205-1212.
30	Yu C， Zhang J， Pang X P， et al. Soil disturbance and disturbance intensity： Response of soil nutrient concentrations of alpine meadow to plateau pika bioturbation in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau， China. Geoderma， 2017， 307（5）： 98-106.
31	Lama S， Velescu A， Leimer S， et al. Plant diversity influenced gross nitrogen mineralization， microbial ammonium consumption and gross inorganic N immobilization in a grassland experiment. Oecologia， 2020， 193（3）： 731-748.
32	Zhao H， Wei D， Yan Y， et al. Alpine hummocks drive plant diversity and soil fertile islands on the Tibetan Plateau. Wetlands， 2020， 40（5）： 1217-1227.
33	Jiang L， Hu J， Yang Z A， et al. Effects of plant functional group removal on community structure， diversity and production in alpine meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica， 2021， 41（4）： 1402-1411.
	姜林，胡骥，杨振安，等. 植物功能群去除对高寒草甸群落结构，多样性及生产力的影响. 生态学报， 2021， 41（4）： 1402-1411.
34	Guo Z G， Li X F， Liu X Y， et al. Response of alpine meadow communities to burrow density changes of plateau pika （Ochotona curzoniae） in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica， 2012， 32（1）： 44-49.
35	Liu J， Feng C， Wang D L， et al. Impacts of grazing by different large herbivores in grassland depend on plant species diversity. Journal of Applied Ecology， 2015， 52（4）： 1053-1062.
36	Wei X， Lin H， Hai W F. Increasing soil configurational heterogeneity promotes plant community evenness through equalizing differences in competitive ability. Science of the Total Environment， 2021， 750： 142308.

指标 Index	项目 Item	未干扰Undisturbance			干扰Disturbance
指标 Index	项目 Item	拟合方程Fitting equations	R²	r	拟合方程Fitting equations	R²	r
FAD₂	Patrick	y=0.0421x+1.487	0.9199	0.959**	y=0.0292x+1.764	0.8795	0.938**
		y=1.5889e^0.0189^x	0.9022		y=1.8554e^0.0116^x	0.8667
		y=0.7449ln（x）+0.1245	0.9378		y=0.7152ln（x）+0.2281	0.8718
		y=-0.0011x²+0.0826x+1.1367	0.9353		y=-0.0001x²+0.0346x+1.6999	0.8800
	Shannon	y=0.3173x+1.4461	0.3268	0.926**	y=0.7864x+0.2331	0.8334	0.913**
		y=1.5625e^0.1418^x	0.3178		y=1.0032e^0.315^x	0.8308
		y=0.3871ln（x）+1.9015	0.1528		y=2.236ln（x）+0.1435	0.8248
		y=0.4703x²-1.6267x+3.2612	0.8488		y=0.1856x²-0.2835x+1.7596	0.8376
	Pielou	y=-0.7744x+2.9026	0.0586	-0.242	y=-0.3645x+2.7652	0.0123	-0.111
		y=3.0331e^-0.361^x	0.0621		y=2.7708e^-0.148^x	0.0126
		y=-0.574ln（x）+2.1504	0.0478		y=-0.228ln（x）+2.4194	0.0080
		y=-16.957x²+27.278x-8.6092	0.2597		y=-5.5064x²+8.3161x-0.617	0.0646
FEve	Patrick	y=-0.0016x+0.7483	0.0457	-0.214	y=-0.0013x+0.7342	0.1218	-0.349
		y=0.747e^-0.002^x	0.0421		y=0.7343e^-0.002^x	0.1225
		y=-0.036ln（x）+0.8207	0.0715		y=-0.034ln（x）+0.8088	0.1363
		y=0.0005x²-0.02x+0.9073	0.1507		y=0.0001x²-0.007x+0.8021	0.1602
	Shannon	y=-0.0079x+0.7394	0.0028	-0.052	y=-0.0266x+0.7784	0.0665	-0.258
		y=0.7326e^-0.008^x	0.0014		y=0.7815e^-0.038^x	0.0658
		y=-0.027ln（x）+0.744	0.0047		y=-0.08ln（x）+0.7863	0.0742
		y=0.1342x²-0.6996x+1.6209	0.0735		y=0.0996x²-0.6006x+1.5974	0.1509
	Pielou	y=0.2659x+0.4966	0.2297	0.258	y=0.1015x+0.619	0.0665	0.479**
		y=0.5218e^0.3815^x	0.2300		y=0.6222e^0.1465^x	0.0684
		y=0.2185ln（x）+0.7589	0.2302		y=0.0694ln（x）+0.7165	0.0519
		y=-0.1184x²+0.4618x+0.4162	0.2361		y=0.8947x²-1.3089x+1.1685	0.1630
FDis	Patrick	y=-0.0036x+0.8127	0.3364	-0.580**	y=-0.0021x+0.807	0.2799	-0.520**
		y=0.8155e^-0.005^x	0.3310		y=0.8077e^-0.003^x	0.2737
		y=-0.062ln（x）+0.9238	0.3228		y=-0.054ln（x）+0.9231	0.2702
		y=-4×10^-7x²-0.0036x+0.8126	0.3363		y=5×10^-5x²-0.0048x+0.8388	0.2798
	Shannon	y=-0.0565x+0.895	0.2095	-0.458*	y=-0.0571x+0.9178	0.2521	-0.502**
		y=0.9098e^-0.076^x	0.2027		y=0.9342e^-0.075^x	0.2538
		y=-0.144ln（x）+0.8848	0.2088		y=-0.164ln（x）+0.9258	0.2538
		y=-0.0044x²-0.034x+0.8663	0.2096		y=0.0155x²-0.1465x+1.0453	0.2546
	Pielou	y=0.0944x+0.6681	0.0436	0.209	y=0.0452x+0.7184	0.0108	0.104
		y=0.6683e^0.1321^x	0.0460		y=0.7186e^0.0598^x	0.0111
		y=0.0769ln（x）+0.7611	0.0429		y=0.0282ln（x）+0.7612	0.0070
		y=0.0744x²-0.0287x+0.7186	0.0438		y=0.6166x²-0.9268x+1.0971	0.0484

指标 Index	项目 Item	未干扰Undisturbance			干扰Disturbance
指标 Index	项目 Item	拟合方程Fitting equations	R²	r	拟合方程Fitting equations	R²	r
FAD₂	Patrick	y=0.0421x+1.487	0.9199	0.959**	y=0.0292x+1.764	0.8795	0.938**
		y=1.5889e^0.0189^x	0.9022		y=1.8554e^0.0116^x	0.8667
		y=0.7449ln（x）+0.1245	0.9378		y=0.7152ln（x）+0.2281	0.8718
		y=-0.0011x²+0.0826x+1.1367	0.9353		y=-0.0001x²+0.0346x+1.6999	0.8800
	Shannon	y=0.3173x+1.4461	0.3268	0.926**	y=0.7864x+0.2331	0.8334	0.913**
		y=1.5625e^0.1418^x	0.3178		y=1.0032e^0.315^x	0.8308
		y=0.3871ln（x）+1.9015	0.1528		y=2.236ln（x）+0.1435	0.8248
		y=0.4703x²-1.6267x+3.2612	0.8488		y=0.1856x²-0.2835x+1.7596	0.8376
	Pielou	y=-0.7744x+2.9026	0.0586	-0.242	y=-0.3645x+2.7652	0.0123	-0.111
		y=3.0331e^-0.361^x	0.0621		y=2.7708e^-0.148^x	0.0126
		y=-0.574ln（x）+2.1504	0.0478		y=-0.228ln（x）+2.4194	0.0080
		y=-16.957x²+27.278x-8.6092	0.2597		y=-5.5064x²+8.3161x-0.617	0.0646
FEve	Patrick	y=-0.0016x+0.7483	0.0457	-0.214	y=-0.0013x+0.7342	0.1218	-0.349
		y=0.747e^-0.002^x	0.0421		y=0.7343e^-0.002^x	0.1225
		y=-0.036ln（x）+0.8207	0.0715		y=-0.034ln（x）+0.8088	0.1363
		y=0.0005x²-0.02x+0.9073	0.1507		y=0.0001x²-0.007x+0.8021	0.1602
	Shannon	y=-0.0079x+0.7394	0.0028	-0.052	y=-0.0266x+0.7784	0.0665	-0.258
		y=0.7326e^-0.008^x	0.0014		y=0.7815e^-0.038^x	0.0658
		y=-0.027ln（x）+0.744	0.0047		y=-0.08ln（x）+0.7863	0.0742
		y=0.1342x²-0.6996x+1.6209	0.0735		y=0.0996x²-0.6006x+1.5974	0.1509
	Pielou	y=0.2659x+0.4966	0.2297	0.258	y=0.1015x+0.619	0.0665	0.479**
		y=0.5218e^0.3815^x	0.2300		y=0.6222e^0.1465^x	0.0684
		y=0.2185ln（x）+0.7589	0.2302		y=0.0694ln（x）+0.7165	0.0519
		y=-0.1184x²+0.4618x+0.4162	0.2361		y=0.8947x²-1.3089x+1.1685	0.1630
FDis	Patrick	y=-0.0036x+0.8127	0.3364	-0.580**	y=-0.0021x+0.807	0.2799	-0.520**
		y=0.8155e^-0.005^x	0.3310		y=0.8077e^-0.003^x	0.2737
		y=-0.062ln（x）+0.9238	0.3228		y=-0.054ln（x）+0.9231	0.2702
		y=-4×10^-7x²-0.0036x+0.8126	0.3363		y=5×10^-5x²-0.0048x+0.8388	0.2798
	Shannon	y=-0.0565x+0.895	0.2095	-0.458*	y=-0.0571x+0.9178	0.2521	-0.502**
		y=0.9098e^-0.076^x	0.2027		y=0.9342e^-0.075^x	0.2538
		y=-0.144ln（x）+0.8848	0.2088		y=-0.164ln（x）+0.9258	0.2538
		y=-0.0044x²-0.034x+0.8663	0.2096		y=0.0155x²-0.1465x+1.0453	0.2546
	Pielou	y=0.0944x+0.6681	0.0436	0.209	y=0.0452x+0.7184	0.0108	0.104
		y=0.6683e^0.1321^x	0.0460		y=0.7186e^0.0598^x	0.0111
		y=0.0769ln（x）+0.7611	0.0429		y=0.0282ln（x）+0.7612	0.0070
		y=0.0744x²-0.0287x+0.7186	0.0438		y=0.6166x²-0.9268x+1.0971	0.0484

[1]	游郭虹, 刘丹, 王艳丽, 王长庭. 高寒草甸植物叶片生态化学计量特征对长期氮肥添加的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(9): 50-62.
[2]	张玉琢, 杨志贵, 于红妍, 张强, 杨淑霞, 赵婷, 许画画, 孟宝平, 吕燕燕. 基于STARFM的草地地上生物量遥感估测研究——以甘肃省夏河县桑科草原为例[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6): 23-34.
[3]	李洋, 王毅, 韩国栋, 孙建, 汪亚峰. 青藏高原高寒草地土壤微生物量碳氮含量特征及其控制要素[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6): 50-60.
[4]	刘咏梅, 董幸枝, 龙永清, 朱志梅, 王雷, 盖星华, 赵樊, 李京忠. 退化高寒草甸狼毒群落分类特征及其环境影响因子[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 1-11.
[5]	李鑫, 魏雪, 王长庭, 任晓, 吴鹏飞. 外源性养分添加对高寒草甸土壤节肢动物群落的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 155-164.
[6]	王永宏, 田黎明, 艾鷖, 陈仕勇, 泽让东科. 短期牦牛放牧对青藏高原高寒草地土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(10): 41-52.
[7]	唐立涛, 毛睿, 王长庭, 李洁, 胡雷, 字洪标. 氮磷添加对高寒草甸植物群落根系特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(9): 105-116.
[8]	张伟, 宜树华, 秦彧, 上官冬辉, 秦炎. 基于无人机的高寒草甸地表温度监测及影响因素研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 15-27.
[9]	罗文蓉, 胡国铮, 干珠扎布, 高清竹, 李岩, 葛怡情, 李钰, 何世丞, 旦久罗布. 模拟干旱对藏北高寒草甸植物物候期和生产力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 82-92.
[10]	王琇瑜, 黄晓霞, 和克俭, 孙晓能, 吕曾哲舟, 张勇, 朱湄, 曾睿钦. 滇西北高寒草甸植物群落功能性状与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 6-17.
[11]	徐田伟, 赵炯昌, 毛绍娟, 耿远月, 刘宏金, 赵新全, 徐世晓. 青海省海北地区高寒草甸群落特征和生物量对短期休牧的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 1-8.
[12]	杨阳, 田莉华, 田浩琦, 孙怀恩, 赵景学, 周青平. 增温对川西北高寒草甸草场植物凋落物分解的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 35-46.
[13]	马海霞, 张德罡, 陈瑾, 郭春秀, 董永平, 马源, 康玉坤, 陈璐, 杜凯, 陈建纲. 祁连山东段高寒草甸土壤持水能力在小尺度不同坡面位置的分异特征[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 28-37.
[14]	张灵菲, 卫万荣, 石高宇, 张卫国. 高寒草甸植物群落结构对高原鼠兔种群密度的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(3): 93-100.
[15]	王多斌, 籍常婷, 林慧龙. 基于DNDC模型的高寒草甸土壤有机碳含量动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 197-204.

高原鼠兔对高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性关系的影响

Effects of plateau pika on the relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine meadow

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics